# LGBTQIA+ Architecture Contributions and Subversion

The contributions of LGBTQ individuals to architecture are significant, although the direct influence of their sexuality on the style, layout, and materials of their designs is still a subject of debate. Recent queer theoretical frameworks have explored how LGBTQ people shape, inhabit, and alter functions of architectural spaces, offering insights into how architectural practices reflect broader social and cultural dynamics, particularly regarding identity, visibility, and marginalization.
LGBTQ contributions to architecture span a wide spectrum of design practices, ranging from flamboyant and ostentatious styles to more restrained and conventional forms. While the works of Walpole and Beckford have often been associated with flamboyance, it is crucial to recognize that many LGBTQ architects and designers, such as Charles Robert Ashbee, contributed to more conventional movements like Arts & Crafts, without the overt markers of queerness. Focusing solely on the flamboyant aspects risks reinforcing stereotypes and overlooks the diversity of LGBTQ architectural contributions.
The lack of reliable data on LGBTQIA+ architects presents a significant challenge to achieving equity within the profession. This gap perpetuates the invisibility of queer identities and undermines efforts to address systemic exclusion. For instance, national data sources like the U.S. Census fail to offer meaningful insights into LGBTQIA+ populations, and architectural organizations such as NCARB and NAAB do not yet track these identities comprehensively. The absence of such critical metrics hinders the ability to measure progress or address the needs of LGBTQIA+ professionals.
While the concept of a distinct "queer architecture" remains a matter of scholarly debate, it is evident that architectural forms have responded to the shifting relationship between LGBTQ individuals and broader societal structures. The built environment has served as a means of negotiating identity, privacy, and visibility, providing spaces that reflect the tensions between societal pressures and personal expression. Whether through overtly dramatic designs or more subtle adaptations, architecture has offered LGBTQ individuals both refuge and resistance in the face of a hostile environment.

## Influence on architecture and subverting function of form
### Ancient Rome

Antinous, a youth from Bithynia, became the beloved of Roman Emperor Hadrian (r. 117-138 CE) around 123 CE. Their relationship was rooted in the Greek tradition of erastes and eromenos, where an older man (erastes) took on an educational and affectionate role toward a younger man (eromenos). Hadrian, known for his preference for male lovers, brought Antinous into his circle and educated him both socially and intellectually. The bond between them had a profound impact on Hadrian's personal life and, later, on his architectural endeavors.
After Antinous' death in 130 CE, Hadrian, deeply affected, commissioned the construction of a city in his lover's honor, Antinopolis, near Hermopolis in Egypt. Modeled after Alexandria, the city's layout and the surrounding monuments reflected Hadrian's desire to immortalize Antinous. The city served not only as a tribute to his lover but also as a means of asserting his personal connection to the divine, as Antinous was deified following his death.
The cult of Antinous spread rapidly throughout the Roman Empire, establishing temples, altars, and statues in his honor. This cult, associated with healing powers, also symbolized the intersection of sexuality and religion in Roman society. Antinous was venerated as a god who, having once been mortal, could empathize with human suffering. His statues were focal points of worship, often receiving daily offerings and being treated with the same reverence as other deities.
However, the rise of Christianity led to resistance against the cult of Antinous, as Christian writers condemned it as immoral. Despite this, the cult persisted until it was officially outlawed by Emperor Theodosius I in 391 CE. Through the architectural projects he initiated in Antinous' name, Hadrian's sexuality and personal relationships left a lasting imprint on the built environment, reflecting how personal affection and sexuality could shape public life in ancient Rome.

### "Queer" Gothic architecture

The late 18th and early 19th-century Gothic style, particularly as exemplified by William Beckford and Horace Walpole, has been the subject of queer architectural analysis. Both Beckford and Walpole were key figures in the development of eccentric, fantastical architectural forms that blended personal identity with artistic expression. Their works, while rooted in Gothic aesthetics, reflect a broader social and cultural queerness, evident in their social circles and artistic endeavors.

### "Queer" Modern architecture

LGBTQ artists and designers made pivotal contributions to 20th-century English modernism, with figures such as Enid Marx and interior designers featured in Vogue magazine playing central roles in defining a distinctive modernist aesthetic. The so-called "Amusing style," characterized by playful, whimsical, and gender-fluid design elements, challenged conventional gender norms and social expectations, reflecting broader shifts in cultural attitudes toward gender and identity during the interwar period.
The design of St Ann's Court by architect Christopher Tunnard and his partner Gerald Schlesinger exemplifies the ways in which LGBTQ individuals navigated societal homophobia during the early 20th century. Completed in 1937, the building incorporates features such as retractable screens in the master bedroom, allowing the couple to conceal their relationship from the public eye. This architectural response to social hostility highlights how design can accommodate both the desire for privacy and the need to navigate a homophobic society.

### Strawberry Hill's theatrical design

Walpole's Strawberry Hill serves as an important case study in how architecture can reflect the social dynamics and personal identities of its creator. The building's whimsical Gothic Revival style, characterized by theatrical and elaborate features, provided a setting for exclusive same-sex social gatherings. The space functioned as both a public display and a private retreat, illustrating how architectural design could serve as a subtle form of resistance to prevailing societal norms.

### Beckford's Fonthill Abbey

William Beckford's Fonthill Abbey, begun in 1796, represents an extravagant and highly personal interpretation of Georgian 'Gothick' architecture. Its excessive and ambitious design, particularly the 276-foot-high tower, epitomized Beckford's unique vision but also resulted in structural instability. Viewed through a modern lens, the building can be considered an example of 'camp'—intentionally exaggerated, self-aware, and theatrical architecture, marking a departure from the more scholarly Gothic Revival of the period.

### Anne Lister's Shibden Hall

The remodeling of Shibden Hall by Anne Lister offers a notable example of subversive queer architecture. Lister's modifications, which included the addition of a Gothic tower and library, reflected her need to balance societal expectations of respectability with her desire for personal privacy. Inspired in part by the Ladies of Llangollen's Plas Newydd, Lister's architectural choices demonstrate how design can navigate the complex intersection of public persona and private identity, offering a space for both social engagement and seclusion.

## Literature focused on LGBTQ architecture and design

Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire by Aaron Betsky argues that queer spaces subvert traditional architectural forms, which often uphold heteronormative societal structures. This subversion manifests in the adaptive reuse of spaces, such as transforming bathhouses or dance clubs into sites of liberation and self-expression. These venues are not merely functional; they symbolize the rejection of rigid boundaries and linear designs in favor of fluidity, openness, and unpredictability—reflecting queer identities.
A central theme in Betsky's analysis is the transient and performative quality of queer spaces. He describes spaces like nightclubs and cruising grounds as "queer architectures" because they are less about permanence and more about experiences and interactions. For example, the design of gay clubs prioritizes sensory engagement—through dramatic lighting, mirrored surfaces, and flexible layouts—emphasizing movement and transformation rather than static functionality. This focus on temporality mirrors the precarious place of queer communities within broader social structures.
Betsky's work highlights how queer spaces often dissolve traditional divisions between public and private realms. Parks, alleys, and other urban landscapes become sites of intimacy and exploration, repurposed to meet the needs of queer individuals. Similarly, domestic spaces, such as the homes used for underground drag balls, take on public functions, fostering community and collective identity. This blurring of boundaries reflects a rejection of fixed spatial norms in favor of fluidity and adaptability.
Betsky also examines how gay communities have reshaped urban environments, turning marginalized neighborhoods into vibrant cultural centers. Spaces like New York's Fire Island, San Francisco's Castro District, and the underground ballroom scenes exemplify how queer individuals reimagine urban landscapes. Through both physical and symbolic transformations, these spaces serve as sites of resistance, solidarity, and visibility, challenging the invisibility imposed by mainstream architectural practices.
Betsky's notion of "queering" architecture extends beyond physical spaces to the reimagining of design principles. He critiques traditional architecture for its rigidity and argues that queer design practices emphasize fluidity, ambiguity, and subversion. This ethos is evident in spaces like the Haus of Gaga (Named in reference to contemporary artist Lady Gaga and the BauHaus ), where flamboyant design elements and playful reinterpretations of conventional forms create environments that celebrate queerness as an aesthetic and political stance.

## The future of Queer architecture
### The Organization of Lesbian and Gay Architects + Designers (OLGAD)

Established in 1991 in New York City, played a pivotal role in reclaiming queer architectural history and fostering discourse on "queer design." By identifying historically significant spaces and recognizing the contributions of LGBTQ architects, OLGAD connected architecture with broader movements for queer visibility. Its 1994 Guide to Lesbian & Gay New York Historical Landmarks expanded the understanding of LGBTQ place-based history beyond The Stonewall inn, influencing the recognition of sites like the Stonewall Inn on the National Register of Historic Places and as a National Historic Landmark. Evolving from OLGAD's efforts, the New York City LGBT Historic Sites Project, launched in 2015, continues to preserve, and highlight over 140 queer spaces across the city, showcasing the lasting impact of LGBTQ narratives on architectural and urban history.

### ACSA an international association of architecture schools

The research series Where Are My People? Queer in Architecture explores the experiences of LGBTQIA+ individuals within the architecture profession, highlighting their contributions and the challenges they face. The findings reveal significant underrepresentation of LGBTQIA+ individuals across all major architectural organizations, such as NCARB, AIA and ACSA, with reported figures of less than 2% membership for LGBTQIA+ individuals and even fewer identifying as non-binary. These disparities underscore the marginalization of queer identities in architecture, worsened by the societal reluctance to collect or analyze comprehensive data on this population. Visibility remains limited, as many individuals may choose not to disclose their identities due to fear of discrimination or safety concerns, reflecting broader patterns of social exclusion.
The study emphasizes the importance of understanding the intersectional nature of LGBTQIA+ identities and their impact on architectural practice. These identities intersect with race, gender, class, and other social categories, shaping how individuals experience and contribute to the discipline. Survey respondents consistently cited their heightened awareness of marginalization, a perspective that influences their approach to architecture. These intersections challenge traditional narratives about who architecture serves, urging a redefinition of the profession's priorities to include broader and more inclusive responses to human needs.
A recurring theme in the study is the role of LGBTQIA+ architects in challenging traditional norms and stereotypes. Respondents highlighted their commitment to atypical space-making practices that resist the status quo and address the needs of marginalized communities. This counter-normative approach often manifests in advocating for more inclusive and diverse spaces that serve populations beyond conventional frameworks. Such efforts align with broader discussions about the potential of architecture to foster equity and justice in the built environment.
The research underscores the importance of continued advocacy and data collection to support LGBTQIA+ individuals in architecture. By keeping surveys open and updating findings, initiatives like Where Are My People? aim to track progress and adapt to evolving challenges. These efforts are not merely about representation but about transforming architectural practice to better reflect the diversity of society. Encouraging participation from LGBTQIA+ professionals and expanding the discourse on equity and inclusion will be crucial for fostering a more just and innovative architectural discipline.