# Secular Shrine Theory

Secular Shrine Theory or Jinja hishūkyōron (神社非宗教論) was a religious policy and political theory that arose in Japan during the 19th and early 20th centuries due to the separation of church and state of the Meiji Government. It was the idea that Shinto Shrines were secular in their nature rather than religious, and that Shinto was not a religion, but rather a secular set of Japanese national traditions. This was linked to State Shinto and the idea that the state controlling and enforcing Shinto was not a violation of freedom of religion. It was subject to immense debate over this time and ultimately declined and disappeared during the Shōwa era.
Part of a series on the :
Philosophy of religion :
Religious concepts
Afterlife
Apophatism
Cataphatism
Eschatology
Enlightenment
Intelligent design
Liberation
Miracle
Mysticism
Religious belief
Reincarnation
Religious faith
Scripture (religious text)
Soul
Spirit
Theological veto :
Challenges
Ethical egoism
Euthyphro dilemma
Logical positivism
Religious language
Verificationism
eschatological
Problem of evil
Theodicy
Augustinian
Irenaean
Best of all possible worlds
Inconsistent triad
Natural evil :
God
Conceptions
Anthropopathism
Brahman
Demiurge
Divinely simple
Form of the Good
Holy Spirit
Maltheist
Occasionalism
Pandeist
Personal
Process-theological
Summum bonum
Supreme Being
Unmoved mover
Existence
Arguments for
Beauty
Christological
Trilemma
Resurrection
Consciousness
Cosmological
kalām
contingency
metaphysical
Degree
Desire
Experience
Existential choice
Fine-tuned universe
Love
Mathematics
Miracles
Morality
Mystical idealism
Natural law
Necessary existent
Seddiqin
Nyayakusumanjali
Occam's Razor
Ontological
Gödel
Modal
Anselm
Meinongian
Mulla Sadra
Spinoza
Pascal's wager
Proper basis / Reformed epistemology
Reason
Responses to evil
Teleological
Intelligent design
Watchmaker
Junkyard
Trademark
Transcendental
Arguments against
747 gambit
Atheist's wager
Creator of God
Evil
Evil God
Fate of the unlearned
Free will
God of the gaps
Hell
Hitchens's razor
Incompatible properties
Inconsistency
No limits fallacy
Nonbelief
Noncognitivism
Omnipotence paradox
Poor design
Russell's teapot
By religion
Abrahamic
Baháʼí
Christianity
Islam
Judaism
Mormonism
Mandaeism
Buddhism
Hinduism
Jainism
Sikhism
Wicca :
Theories of religion
Acosmism
Agnosticism
Animism
Antireligion
Atheism
Creationism
Dharmism
Deism
Divine command theory
Dualism
Esotericism
Exclusivism
Existentialism
atheist
Christian
Feminist
Fundamentalism
Gnosticism
Henotheism
Humanism
Christian
religious
secular
Inclusivism
Monism
Monotheism
Mysticism
Naturalism
humanistic
metaphysical
religious
New Age
Nondualism
Nontheism
Pandeism
Panentheism
Pantheism
Perennialism
Polytheism
Process
Secular Shrine Theory
Shendao shejiao
Spiritualism
Shamanism
Taoic
Theism
Transcendentalism :
Philosophers of religion
Ancient and medieval
Anselm of Canterbury
Augustine of Hippo
Avicenna
Averroes
Boethius
Gaudapada
Al-Ghazali
Gaunilo of Marmoutiers
Pico della Mirandola
Heraclitus
King James VI and I
Marcion of Sinope
Maimonides
Adi Shankara
Thomas Aquinas
William of Ockham
Early modern
Augustin Calmet
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
Desiderius Erasmus
Baruch Spinoza
Nicolas Malebranche
Gottfried W Leibniz
William Wollaston
Thomas Chubb
David Hume
Baron d'Holbach
Immanuel Kant
Johann G Herder
19th-century
Friedrich Schleiermacher
Karl C F Krause
Georg W F Hegel
Thomas Carlyle
William Whewell
Ludwig Feuerbach
Søren Kierkegaard
Karl Marx
Albrecht Ritschl
Afrikan Spir
Usman dan Fodio
Ernst Haeckel
W K Clifford
Friedrich Nietzsche
Harald Høffding
William James
Vladimir Solovyov
Ernst Troeltsch
Rudolf Otto
Lev Shestov
Ernst Cassirer
Joseph Maréchal
Contemporary
George Santayana
Bertrand Russell
Martin Buber
Sergei Bulgakov
René Guénon
Paul Tillich
Karl Barth
Pavel Florensky
Emil Brunner
Rudolf Bultmann
Gabriel Marcel
Reinhold Niebuhr
Charles Hartshorne
Mircea Eliade
Frithjof Schuon
J. L. Mackie
Walter Kaufmann
Martin Lings
Peter Geach
George I Mavrodes
William Alston
Antony Flew
Kurt Godel
Graham Oppy
J. L. Schellenberg
Paul Draper
William L Rowe
Dewi Z Phillips
Alvin Plantinga
Anthony Kenny
Nicholas Wolterstorff
Richard Swinburne
Robert Merrihew Adams
Ravi Zacharias
Peter van Inwagen
Cornel West
Loyal Rue
Herman Philipse
Kai Nielsen
Jean-Luc Marion
William Lane Craig
Ali Akbar Rashad
Yujin Nagasawa
Alexander Pruss :
Related topics
Criticism of religion
Ethics in religion
Exegesis
Faith and rationality
History of religions
Natural theology
Religion and science
Religious philosophy
Theology :
Philosophy of religion article index :
vte :

## Linguistic debate

Translating the word "religion" into Japanese has been controversial from the beginning, with some scholars arguing it was a Christian concept that did not apply to Shinto.
Kozaki Hiromichi first translated the English word "religion" as shūkyō (宗教) Before that, Yukichi Fukuzawa translated it as shūmon (宗門) and shūshi (宗旨), and Masanao Nakamura translated it as hōkyō (法教)
According to Genchi Kato:
In other words, Shinto was not included in the translation of "religion".
In the Taishō era (1912–1926), the origin of the word "religion" was traced back to Latin, which came from Christian studies. The classical etymology of the word, traced to Cicero himself, derives it from relegere: prefix re- ("again") + lego ("read"), where lego is in the sense of "go over", "choose", or "consider carefully". Modern scholars such as Tom Harpur and Joseph Campbell have argued that religio is derived from religare, as re- ("again") + ligare ("bind; connect"), which was made prominent by Augustine of Hippo, following the interpretation of Lactantius in Divinae institutiones, IV, 28.
   They have known me for a long time and can testify, if they are willing, that I conformed to the strictest sect of our religion, living as a Pharisee.
The word shūkyō (宗教) comes from Buddhism, according to Buddhist scholar Hajime Nakamura . In Buddhism, it means "the teaching of the sect", that is, the "teaching" of the "sect", which means the ultimate principle or truth, and religion existed as a subordinate concept of Buddhism .
Christian theologians have traditionally held that the meaning and wording of the word religion has been continued in its original meaning from Latin, which is the way it is used today. The Christian position in Japan has always been that Shinto is a religion since its introduction. In Japan, there was a deep-rooted sense of caution against foreign religions, and problems arose accordingly. Christian missionary activity, which began at the beginning of the Meiji era, was also divided into different denominations, and problems arose as a result.
It is believed that the Shinto side adopted the Secular Shrine Theory in part because they argued that Shinto is different from Buddhism and Christianity, that is, it is unique to Japan. On the contrary, from the Buddhist and Christian sides, the argument was that Shinto is a religion because it has an object of veneration.
Of course, during that time, the religious and non-religious nature of Shinto shrines was debated not as a legal issue but purely as a matter of religious studies. However, it never became a social or political issue that could move public opinion, because it was a debate within the realm of universities and academia, and never developed into a political movement.
That said, there are modern objections to this, and P. Burger, in The Sacred Canopy.

## Meiji Constitution

The Meiji Constitution said that subjects will have freedom of religion as long as it does not inferfere with their duties as subjects, this has been interpreted as making the Imperial Cult separate.
On January 24, 1882, a Home Ministry notice stated that shrines were not religious (Secular Shrine Theory). However, Shinto funeral rites under Prefectural shrines were allowed, and the priests of the great shrines were not considered clergy.
It was argued that
In the "On the Relationship between Religious Bills and Shrines", which appears to have been prepared by the Home Ministry Bureau of Shrines around 1930, it was stated that:

## Internal Shinto controversy

Originally, the Meiji government was aiming for a politics of "Unity of ritual and government" due to the "Proclamation of the Great Doctrine", but due to the conflict between the "Buddhist side" and the "Shinto side" over the teaching profession, "the joint mission of God and Buddha was prohibited". It begins with the transfer of each religious administration to the Ministry of Interior. The following is a description of the situation that led to the "separation of religious and political affairs" from the "Shinto controversy". The separation of religious and political affairs is said to have been proposed by the Shinto side, and was led by Maruyama Sakura [ja] and others.
Following the dissolution of the Great Teaching Institute, the Bureau of Shinto Affairs was established, and in 1881, the Shinto priests of the Ise sect, Yoritsune Tanaka [ja] and others, and the priest of the Izumo sect, Senge Takatomi, argued over the ritual deity This led to an imperial request to Emperor Meiji. The Jōdo Shinshū side did not stand idly by and watch this chaotic situation, and following Shimaji Mokurai [ja], Atsumi Kaien [ja], Akamatsu Renjo [ja] and other theoreticians went out one after another to advise the government to cooperate. It was the successor to Shimaji Mokurai [ja]'s theory that Shinto is not a religion, and the political powers that be were forced to confirm it, and to forbid all religious speech, teaching, and religious acts (such as funeral rites) by priests involved in state ceremonies. This would have completely blocked the way for "Shinto as a religious belief" to become the national religion.
It is not clear who the primary proponents on the Shinto side were. Originally, the word "Shūkyō (宗教)" was a translation of the English word "religion", and there is no clear definition of the concept. The Shinto side referred to Shinto as the "national religion" or "main religion", but there was no such theory that Shinto was a part of a religion. The non-religious theory of Maruyama Sakura and others is thought to have been based on their concern about the situation in which Shinto was becoming divided due to ritual god disputes, etc., which resembled "religious theological disputes" in the new terminology of the time, and the fact that Shinto could not maintain its national status without stopping such divisions.
According to Yoshio Keino of Keio University, the government did not originally present the theory of non-religious shrines, but it was actively promoted by the Buddhist side. This is because the situation at the time was that the definition of religion was "proselytizing and conducting funerals.
Among them, Yamada Akiyoshi, the Minister of the Interior, adopted the theory of non-religious shrines presented by the Shinto side, including Maruyama Sakura.
Later, Senge Takatomi left the Bureau of Shinto Affairs in order to proselytize and founded the Izumo Taisha-kyo.

### Department of Divinities Reconstruction Movement

After the Satsuma Rebellion, the Satsuma Domain and other Shizoku began to focus on the management of Shinto shrines dedicated to their Ujigami. And with that, the Priests emerged as the Freedom and People's Rights Movement.
In June 1887, Shinto priests in Kyushu organized the Saikai Rengo-kai, which appealed to Shintoists throughout the country, arousing strong sympathy and emerging as a nationwide organized movement of Shinto priests . On November 17, 1887, representatives from each prefecture met at the Imperial Classic Research Institute, and each committee member formed an association of priests, and the movement to revive the Shinto priests was launched nationwide.
Also, in March 1890, rumors circulated in Shinto circles that Shinto was also included as a religion in order to restore it to its original state.
And behind the nationwide movement in the 1890s to revive the Shinto priesthood was a sense of "crisis" among Shinto priests and those involved in the Shinto religion against a government that was promoting a skeletonization of the "state's suzerainty" of Shinto shrines. When rumors of the religious ordinances began to circulate, a full-scale movement was launched to restore the Shinto priesthood by returning the teaching positions of the so-called "Minsha (民社) priests" below the rank of prefectures and shrines.
This movement was somewhat successful, and on April 26, 1899, the Shrine Division, which was only a division of the Bureau of Shrines and Temples of the Ministry of Home Affairs, was upgraded to the Bureau of Shrines. The Bureau of Religions also being split off to deal with other religions such as Sect Shinto.
On June 13, 1913, the Bureau of Religions which was run under the Home Ministry, which had jurisdiction over religions other than Shinto shrines, was transferred to the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.
The debate was whether Shinto shrines are "non-religious" or "religious". In particular, if shrines were religious, the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture has jurisdiction over it, and if they were secular the Home Ministry would have had jurisdiction over them. Some have also arisen as a result of policies taken by the government to bring religious organizations under the rule of law.

### 20th century

Meiji Shrine priest and general Ichinohe Hyoe advocated categorizing Shinto as a religion

## Decline

As the wartime atmosphere became more intense through the February 26 Incident, May 15 Incident, etc., discussions on secular shrine theory were silenced.
After discussion and deliberation by the Religious System Research Committee established by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, a report was submitted to the legislature on the enactment of the Religious Organizations Law, with the aim of bringing religious organizations under the legal system and having them observe the rules that they have voluntarily established. However, it was repeatedly rejected by the majority. However, through persistent persuasion, with the passage of the Religious Organizations Law by Law No. 77 of April 8, 1939, the legislature legally abandoned the 'Secular Shrine Theory'. Because Sect Shinto was now required by law to be designated and approved.
On November 9, 1940, the Ministry of the Interior reorganized its Bureau of Religions and established the Institute of Divinities, which was able to maintain "Secular Shrine Theory as the national religion". Also, in the Penal Code of the time, the Peace Preservation Law and Lèse-majesté to the Emperor of Japan and Jingu, especially the Special Higher Police suppression of other religions existed.
With this shift secular shrine theory came to be replaced by a more authoritarian form of State Shinto