# Recognition of same-sex unions in Montenegro

Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Indian courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Most Japanese cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
↑ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status.
↑ Not yet in effect. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Montenegro has recognised same-sex life partnerships since 15 July 2020. On 1 July, the Parliament of Montenegro passed a bill by 42 votes to 5 to recognise life partnerships offering several, but not all, of the rights and benefits of marriage. The bill was signed into law on 3 July by President Milo Đukanović, took effect on 15 July 2020 and became fully operational one year later. The first life partnership was registered on 25 July 2021.
Montenegro was the third country in former Yugoslavia, after Slovenia and Croatia, to recognise same-sex unions.

## Life partnerships
### Legislative action

On 13 November 2012, Deputy Prime Minister Duško Marković said that the Government of Montenegro would prepare a bill granting some form of legal recognition to same-sex couples. The Human and Minority Rights Ministry drafted a bill to legalise registered partnerships, which would confer some of the rights, benefits and responsibilities of marriage but would not include adoption or fostering rights. The Serbian Orthodox Church and the Democratic Front expressed opposition to the proposal, claiming it would "wreck Christian values and family life in Montenegro". On 27 December 2018, the government gave its support to the draft bill. If enacted, it would have taken effect one year later. The bill was lodged in the Parliament on 24 January 2019, and on 27 February it was backed by the parliamentary committee on human rights. However, on 31 July 2019, the bill was blocked by parliamentarians, led by the Democratic Front, in a 38–4 vote with 39 abstentions. The necessary majority of 41 votes was not achieved. The Democratic Party of Socialists, the Social Democrats and the Liberal Party supported the measure.
On 12 December 2019, the government approved a second, similar draft. It was introduced to the Parliament on 14 January 2020. On 18 June 2020, the bill was backed by the parliamentary committee on human rights, and on 1 July 2020 it was approved by the Parliament in a 42–5 vote. The bill was supported by the Democratic Party of Socialists, the Social Democrats, the Social Democratic Party (except for one deputy), the Liberal Party and one deputy from DEMOS. It was opposed by the opposition (which abstained), as well as three parties representing ethnic minority communities (Croats, Bosniaks, and Albanians). The bill was signed into law on 3 July by President Milo Đukanović, and was published on 7 July 2020 in the Official Gazette of Montenegro. It entered into force on 15 July 2020, and became applicable year later, on 15 July 2021. However, a deadlock in Parliament following Justice Minister Vladimir Leposavić's dismissal from office on 17 June 2021, as well as a lack of adequate documentation by local registrars, caused a delay for same-sex couples to register. The first partnership was conducted in the town of Budva between two women on 25 July 2021. Minister of Public Administration Tamara Srzentić congratulated the couple.
1 July 2020 vote in the Parliament of Montenegro :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Abstained |
| G Democratic Party of Socialists | 35 Aleksandra VukovićAna NikolićAndrija NikolićBogdan FatićBranimir GvozdenovićBranka TanasijevićBranko ČavorDaliborka PejovićDanijel ŽivkovićDragutin PapovićFilip VukovićHalil DukovićJovanka LaličićLuiđ ŠkreljaMaja BakračMarija Maja ĆatovićMarta ŠćepanovićMihailo AnđušićMilorad VuletićMiloš NikolićMiodrag VukovićMirsad MurićMomčilo MartinovićNada DrobnjakNada NenezićNela Savković VukčevićNikola DivanovićNikola RakočevićPetar IvanovićPredrag SekulićRadule NovovićSanja PavićevićSuad NumanovićZvonko VukovićŽana Filipović | – | – |
| Democratic Front | – | – | 18 Aleksandra VujičićAndrija MandićBranka BošnjakBranko RadulovićBudimir AleksićJovan Jole VučurovićKoča PavlovićLjiljana ĐuraškovićMarina JočićMilan KneževićMilun ZogovićMilutin ĐukanovićNebojša MedojevićPredrag BulatovićSlaven RadunovićStrahinja BulajićVeljko VasiljevićVera Bulatović |
| Democratic Montenegro | – | – | 8 Aleksa BečićBoris BogdanovićDanilo ŠarančićDženan KolićMomo KoprivicaValentina MinićVladimir ČađenovićZdenka Popović |
| For the Benefit of All | – | – | 6 Aleksandar DamjanovićAnka VukićevićDanijela PavićevićGoran DanilovićGoran RadonjićSrđan Milić |
| Social Democratic Party | 3 Draginja VuksanovićRanko KrivokapićRaško Konjević | 1 Džavid Šabović | – |
| G Social Democrats | 2 Boris MugošaIvan Brajović | – | – |
| DEMOS | 1 Neđeljko Rudović | – | 1 Miodrag Lekić |
| G Bosniak Party | – | 2 Ervin IbrahimovićNedžad Drešević | – |
| G Croatian Civic Initiative | – | 1 Adrijan Vuksanović | – |
| Liberal Party | 1 Andrija Popović | – | – |
| G New Democratic Force | – | 1 Genci Nimanbegu | – |
| United Reform Action | – | – | 1 Dritan Abazović |
| Total | 42 | 5 | 34 |
| Total | 51.9% | 6.2% | 42.0% |
Prime Minister Duško Marković welcomed the law's passage, tweeting that it was "a great step in the right direction for Montenegrin society, its democratic maturity and integration processes. Equality and same rights for all are the cornerstone of human and European values. I want to thank the LGBTIQ community for dialogue and contribution. There can be no room for discrimination based on sexual orientation in a European Montenegro." The legislation established life partnerships (Montenegrin: životno partnerstvo, pronounced) for same-sex couples, guaranteeing many legal rights and obligations, including inheritance, guardianship, property ownership, hospital and prison visitation rights and domestic violence protections, among others. While it does not recognize full adoption rights, the law allows a person in a life partnership to make decisions concerning their partner's biological children in emergency situations, and grants life partners the same rights as married couples with regard to disputes over the protection of their children's rights.
In June 2022, an LGBT advocacy group, LGBT Forum Progress, filed a lawsuit in Podgorica challenging the government's refusal to recognise same-sex partnerships performed abroad.

### Statistics

Between July 2021 and July 2022, 22 same-sex life partnerships were performed in Montenegro, a majority between Russian citizens. 18 of these partnerships were registered in Budva. By November 2023, 75 partnerships had been performed in Montenegro, mostly in Budva, Podgorica, Herceg Novi and Bar.

## Same-sex marriage

The Constitution of Montenegro was ratified in 2007, one year after independence. Article 71 of the Constitution reads as follows: "Marriage may be entered into only on the basis of a free consent of a woman and a man. Marriage shall be based on equality of spouses." The wording has been interpreted as banning same-sex marriage.

## Public opinion

A December 2022 Ipsos survey showed that 36% of Montenegrins considered same-sex marriage "acceptable" (18% "completely" and 18% "mainly"), while 61% considered it "unacceptable" (45% "completely" and 16% "mainly"). This represented a large increase of support from 2015 when 9% of Montenegrins supported same-sex marriage. With regard to special rights, 68% of respondents supported the right of same-sex couples to receive survivor pension benefits in case of the partner's death.