# Same-sex marriage in Guam

"none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements, conferring some limited legal benefits, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Some cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse recognized for residency rights.
↑ Hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status.
1 2 Not yet in effect. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Guam since June 9, 2015 in accordance with a ruling from the District Court of Guam on June 5 that the territory's prohibition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Guam was the first territory of the United States to recognize same-sex marriage. On August 27, 2015, the Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015 passed by the Guam Legislature came into effect, officially incorporating the federal court ruling into statutory law.

## Marriage statutes
### Early legislation

The Guam Organic Act of 1950, an Act of the United States Congress, does not address the question of marriage. Since August 2015, Guam's marriage statutes have recognised the marriages of same-sex couples. Previously, a 1994 law specifying the responsibilities of the Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services defined marriage as the "union of a man and a woman". That law, which contained a prohibition on marriage "between uncles and nieces or aunts and nephews", arguably showed Guam anticipated recognising only opposite-sex marriages. The law stipulated that parties "must declare in the presence of the person solemnizing the marriage that they take each other as husband and wife." With respect to marriages from other jurisdictions, the statutes stated:
   All marriages contracted outside of the territory of Guam, which would be valid by the laws of the country in which the same were contracted, are valid in the territory of Guam.
The 1994 law, which set standards and procedures for the Department of Public Health and Social Services, included this definition:
   Marriage means the legal union of persons of opposite sex. The legality of the union may be established by civil or religious regulations, as recognized by the laws of Guam.
Federal courts in Guam are subject to the precedents set in 2014 by the decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter and Sevcik v. Sandoval, which found Idaho's and Nevada's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional. The District Court of Guam noted this precedent in its June 2015 ruling permanently enjoining Guam officials from enforcing the 1994 law "or any other laws or regulations to the extent they prohibit otherwise qualified same-sex couples from marrying in Guam".

### 2015 equality legislation

Following the District Court of Guam's June 2015 ruling permanently enjoining Guam officials from enforcing the 1994 law banning same-sex marriage and the U.S Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, Guam legislators on August 12, 2015 passed the Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015, which created legal equality in civil marriage. The bill passed by a margin of 13–2 in the Legislature of Guam. It took effect on August 27, 2015.
August 12, 2015 vote in the Legislature of Guam :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Abstained |
| Democratic Party | 7 Thomas AdaNerissa Bretania UnderwoodBenjamin CruzTina Rose Muña BarnesRory RespicioMichael San NicolasJudith Won Pat | 2 Frank AguonDennis Rodriguez | – |
| Republican Party | 6 Vicente Anthony AdaFrank Blas Jr.James EspaldonBrant McCreadieThomas MorrisonMary Camacho Torres | – | – |
| Total | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| Total | 86.7% | 13.3% | 0.0% |
The law amended the definition of marriage in Guam law to the following:
   Marriage means the legal union between two persons without regard to gender. The legality of the union may be established by civil or religious regulations, as recognized by the laws of Guam [10 Guam Code Annotated § 3207 (h)]

## Proposed legislation

Legislation to permit civil unions (Chamorro: unikon sibit, pronounced) was first discussed in the mid 2000s. After Vermont enacted same-sex marriage legislation in 2009, the 27th Guam Youth Congress, an advisory body which submits legislation to committees of the Legislature of Guam, forwarded a bill to legalize civil unions, with the bill being supported by Speaker Derick Baza Hills. A similar measure failed in the 25th Guam Youth Congress by just one vote. Citing recent rulings in the courts such as the unanimous decision overturning the ban on same-sex marriage in Iowa, Hills later commented that the courts would be essential to make sure we "allow for equal rights". While same-sex marriage was then not being considered in Guam, Hills made sure to point out that "We do have advocates in the Legislature [who support same-sex civil unions] ... I do feel and know that there are senators comfortable supporting this legislation". Hills called on the Legislature to introduce legislation to create such unions, though the extent of rights to be granted was unknown.
On June 3, 2009, Vice-Speaker Benjamin Cruz introduced Bill No. 138, which would have established same-sex civil unions providing all of the rights and benefits of civil marriage. The bill was heavily condemned by the Catholic Church, and it did not get sufficient votes to make it to the session floor. Due to opposition to the bill within the religious community, Bill No. 185 and Bill No. 212 were introduced by proponents of same-sex unions should the civil union bill fail to pass. Bill No. 212 mirrored the bill passed in Hawaii that provided significantly limited rights. It would have established a "Designated Beneficiary Agreement", and unlike civil unions, would have been open to both same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Both bills also failed to pass.

## Licensing same-sex marriage

On April 8, 2015, a lesbian couple were refused a marriage license by the Department of Public Health and Social Services. The next day, the editorial board of the Pacific Daily News endorsed the legalization of same-sex marriage in Guam. Attorney General Elizabeth Barrett-Anderson endorsed the Department's refusal, but when later asked if Guam law violated the Fourteenth Amendment said: "Good question. I can't comment". The couple filed a lawsuit challenging the territory's refusal to grant them a marriage license, Aguero v. Calvo, in the District Court of Guam on April 13.
On April 15, 2015, Attorney General Barrett-Anderson ordered Guam officials to begin licensing same-sex marriages. Barrett-Anderson issued a directive to the Department of Public Health and Social Services to immediately begin processing marriage applications from same-sex couples, instructing that same-sex applicants be treated "with dignity and equality under the Constitution". She cited the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter, which is controlling precedent on federal courts in Guam. However, Governor Eddie Calvo responded the next day by questioning the legal basis for Barrett-Anderson's memorandum. He suggested same-sex marriage licensing should wait until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a case before it. Governor Calvo said the question of marriage should be addressed by the Legislature or voters of Guam, and the acting head of the Department of Public Health and Social Services said his office would not accept applications from same-sex couples seeking marriage licenses for the time being.
On May 8, the Chief Judge of the District Court of Guam, Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, denied the defendants' request to delay proceedings pending action by the U.S. Supreme Court in related cases. She set a briefing schedule and scheduled a hearing for June 5. On June 5, Judge Tydingco-Gatewood issued a ruling striking down Guam's statutory ban on same-sex marriage. The ruling was issued immediately after the court proceedings and went into effect on Tuesday, June 9. Same-sex marriages became performable and recognized in the U.S. territory from that date. Attorneys representing the government said in a May 18 court filing that "should a court strike current Guam law, they would respect and follow such a decision". On June 9, 2015, Loretta Pangelinan, 28, and Kathleen Aguero, 29, plaintiffs in Aguero, were the first of several same-sex couples to receive a marriage license in the territory's capital, Hagåtña. The first couple to marry was Deasia Johnson of Killeen, Texas and Nikki Dismuke of New Orleans, Louisiana, who were married in a brief ceremony in the office of Public Health Director James Gillan on the morning on June 9, the day the island became the United States' first overseas territory to recognize same-sex marriage.

## Marriage statistics

139 same-sex couples married on the island between June 2015 and October 2016. 67 of these couples were Guam residents, while 12 were from the Philippines, 9 from Taiwan, 6 from the state of California and 5 each from Hong Kong and the Northern Mariana Islands. There were also couples from Honduras, Italy, Malaysia, Russia, South Korea and the Netherlands. 363 same-sex marriages had taken place in Guam by March 2019.
In October 2016, the Guam Visitors Bureau began marketing Guam as a same-sex marriage destination in hopes of attracting same-sex couples seeking to marry to the island.

## Public opinion

In a 2009 poll conducted by the Pacific Daily News, 26% of Guam residents supported same-sex marriage, 27% supported same-sex domestic partnerships or civil unions, and 29% of responders said that there should be no legal recognition of same-sex relationships in Guam.
An April 2015 poll conducted by students from the University of Guam found a 55% majority in favor of same-sex marriage, while 29% were opposed and 16% had no opinion on the issue.