# 2012 United States Senate election in Michigan

Elections in Michigan :
Federal government
U.S. President
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
Dem
2008
Dem
GOP
2012
Dem
GOP
2016
Dem
2020
Dem
GOP
2024
Dem
GOP
U.S. Senate
1835
1840 (sp)
1841
1847
1849 (sp)
1853
1857
1858
1862 (sp)
1863
1865
1869
1871
1874
1877
1879 (sp)
1881
1881 (sp)
1887
1889
1893
1895
1895 (sp)
1899
1901
1903 (sp)
1905
1907
1907 (sp)
1911
1913
1916
1918
1922
1924
1924 (sp)
1928
1928 (sp)
1930
1934
1936
1940
1942
1946
1948
1952
1952 (sp)
1954
1958
1960
1964
1966
1970
1972
1976
1978
1982
1984
1988
1990
1994
1996
2000
2002
2006
2008
2012
2014
2018
2020
2024
2026
U.S. House
1835
1837
1838
1840
1843
1844
1846
1847
1st sp
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1862
1864
1866
1868
1870
1871
4th sp
1872
1873
5th sp
1874
1876
1878
1880
1881
7th sp
1882
1884
1886
1888
11th sp
1890
1891
5th sp
1892
1893
1st sp
1894
1895
3rd sp
1896
1898
1900
1901
10th sp
1902
1904
1906
1907
5th sp
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1917
2nd sp
1918
1920
13th sp
1921
3rd sp
1922
1923
3rd sp
1924
1925
3rd sp
1926
1928
1930
1931
8th sp
1932
1934
1935
3rd sp
1936
1938
1940
5th sp
1942
1944
1946
1947
11th sp
1948
1950
1952
1954
1955
15th sp
1956
1958
1960
1961
1st sp
1962
14th sp
1964
1968
1970
1972
1974
5th sp
8th sp
1976
1978
1980
13th sp
1981
4th sp
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
3rd sp
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
11th
11th sp
2014
2016
2018
13th sp
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
State elections
2010
2014
2016
2018
2020
2021
2022
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1835
1837
1839
1841
1843
1845
1847
1849
1851
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1862
1864
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Attorney General elections
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Secretary of State elections
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Auditor General elections
1962
State Senate elections
2002
2006
2010
2014
2016
4th sp
2018
2021 (sp)
2022
State House elections
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot proposals
1996Proposal E
2004Proposal 04-2
2006Proposal 06-2
2008Proposal 1
2012
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
Proposal 3
Proposal 4
Proposal 5
Proposal 6
2015
Proposal 1
2018
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
Proposal 3
2020
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
2022
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
Proposal 3 :
Detroit
Mayoral elections
1969
1973
1997
2001
2005
2009 (sp)
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025 :
Flint
Mayoral elections
2015
2017 (recall)
2019
2022 :
Grand Rapids
Mayoral elections
2015
2019
2024 :
Lansing
Mayoral elections
2017
2021 :
vte :
The 2012 United States Senate election in Michigan was held on November 6, 2012, alongside the 2012 United States presidential election, other elections to the United States Senate in other states, as well as elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.
Incumbent Debbie Stabenow was re-elected in 2006 with 57% of the vote to 41%. She defeated Oakland County sheriff and former State Senate Majority Leader Michael Bouchard after narrowly defeating Republican incumbent Spencer Abraham in 2000. The deadline for candidates to file for the August 7 primary was May 15. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow was re-elected to a third term after being unopposed in the Democratic primary. The Republican nominee was former Congressman Pete Hoekstra. Stabenow defeated Hoekstra by a landslide 20.8% margin and nearly one million votes.

## Democratic primary

Democratic primary results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Democratic | Debbie Stabenow (incumbent) | 702,773 | 100.00% |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 702,773 | 100.00% |

## Republican primary
### Candidates

Qualified/On ballot
* Clark Durant, co-founder of the Cornerstone Schools
* Gary Glenn, conservative activist (suspended his campaign and endorsed Clark Durant)
* Randy Hekman, former juvenile court judge
* Pete Hoekstra, former U.S. Representative
Filed to run, but failed to qualify
* Scotty Boman (switched back to the Libertarian Party)
* Peter Konetchy, businessman
* Chuck Marino, businessman
* Rick Wilson, retired autoworker and unsuccessful candidate for the 5th district in 2010
Declined to file
* Justin Amash, U.S. Representative
* Saul Anuzis, former Michigan Republican Party chairman
* Frank Beckmann, talk show host
* Mike Bishop, former State Senate Majority Leader
* Jase Bolger, Speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives
* Mike Cox, former Michigan Attorney General
* Chad Dewey, businessman
* John Engler, former governor
* Terri Lynn Land, former Michigan Secretary of State
* Thaddeus McCotter, former U.S. Representative
* John McCulloch, Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner (dropped out)
* Candice Miller, U.S. Representative and former Michigan Secretary of State
* Rob Steele, cardiothoracic surgeon

### Campaign

The GOP primary campaign was mainly a battle between Hoekstra and Durant as they were the most visible in running campaign ads. Despite Durant's attack ads, Hoekstra was leading in the polls for the Republican nomination.
On July 20 Glenn suspended his campaign and endorsed Durant; however, his name was still on the ballot due to the time of his withdrawal.

#### Hoekstra ad controversy

Hoekstra targeted Democratic incumbent Debbie Stabenow with a television ad which ran statewide during the 2012 Super Bowl. The 30-second ad opened with the sound of a gong and showed an Asian woman riding a bike in a rice paddy and talking in pidgin English. The ad is critical of government spending by Stabenow and mocks her name with the Asian woman saying "Thank you, Michigan Senator Debbie Spenditnow". The commercial asks viewers to visit Hoekstra's website which has statistics about federal spending beside images of Chinese flags, currency and stereotypical Chinatown font. In the HTML code on Hoekstra's site the woman in the ad was reportedly previously identified as "yellowgirl." It has since been removed.
Asian-American groups called the ad "very disturbing", national GOP consultant Mike Murphy said it was "really, really dumb", and Foreign Policy magazine managing editor Blake Hounshell called it "despicable." A coalition of black ministers in Detroit called for Hoekstra to apologize. Two of Hoekstra's GOP opponents, Clark Durant and Gary Glenn, questioned whether Hoekstra is the right candidate for Republicans to support. The ad was called "blatantly racist" by Michael Yaki, former aide to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Journalist James Fallows of The Atlantic called it the "most revolting ad". The NAACP denounced the ad as an "unnecessary race card." Some warned the ad would revive discrimination against Asian-Americans in Michigan where smashing imported cars was common in the 1980s, and in 1982 Chinese-American Vincent Chin was beaten to death by two unemployed autoworkers angry about Japanese competition. Critics also pointed out that Hoekstra voted for the $700-billion Wall Street bailout and voted for trillions more in deficit spending while he was in Congress.
A Public Policy Polling poll released on show of February 14ed Stabenow leading Hoekstra 51%-37%. In April 2012, Stabenow's campaign reported that she had had her best fundraising quarter ever, taking $1.5m from January to March 2012, which they say was in part due to the advertisement. Hoekstra's campaign, meanwhile, reported disappointing fundraising numbers for the first quarter of 2012, raising just $700,000, down almost $300,000 from the final quarter of 2011.
Despite the criticism, the ad was a factor in Hoekstra's Republican primary victory.

### Polling

| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Clark Durant | Gary Glenn | Randy Hekman | Pete Hoekstra | Peter Konetchy | Other/ Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | May 24–27, 2012 | 360 | ±5.2% | 11% | 4% | 4% | 42% | 0% | 38% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–23, 2012 | 452 | ±4.6% | 17% | — | 4% | 51% | 1% | 26% |

### Results

Republican primary results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Republican | Pete Hoekstra | 398,793 | 54.2 |
| | Republican | Clark Durant | 246,584 | 33.5 |
| | Republican | Randy Hekman | 49,080 | 6.7 |
| | Republican | Gary Glenn | 40,726 | 5.5 |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 735,183 | 100.0 |

## General election
### Candidates

* Debbie Stabenow (Democratic), incumbent U.S. Senator and former U.S. Congresswoman
* Pete Hoekstra (Republican), former U.S. Congressman
* Scott Boman (Libertarian), college professor and libertarian activist
* Harley Mikkelson (Green)
* Richard Matkin (U.S. Taxpayers Party of Michigan)
* John Litle (Natural Law Party)

### Fundraising

| Candidate (party) | Receipts | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Debt |
| Debbie Stabenow (D) | $10,625,660 | $11,376,831 | $1,281,907 | $0 |
| Pete Hoekstra (R) | $5,827,123 | $5,550,301 | $277,855 | $0 |
| Scott Boman (L) | $10,280 | $10,265 | $12 | $0 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission |||||

#### Top contributors

| Debbie Stabenow | Contribution | Pete Hoekstra | Contribution |
| EMILY's List | $107,650 | PVS Chemicals | $40,000 |
| DTE Energy | $89,150 | Caidan Management | $33,000 |
| JP Morgan Chase & Co | $70,300 | Amway | $31,300 |
| Blue Cross & Blue Shield | $51,682 | Dickstein Shapiro LLP | $20,999 |
| University of Michigan | $45,362 | Haworth Inc. | $20,000 |
| Vestar Capital Partners | $39,950 | American Axle & Manufacturing | $17,500 |
| Demmer Corp | $39,800 | Centra Inc | $17,000 |
| General Motors | $38,350 | Byrne Electrical Specialists | $15,500 |
| Ford Motor Co | $35,375 | RA Miller Industries | $15,000 |
| Goldman Sachs | $34,500 | Suburban Collection | $15,000 |

#### Top industries

| Debbie Stabenow | Contribution | Pete Hoekstra | Contribution |
| Lawyers/Law Firms | $622,208 | Retired | $329,199 |
| Financial Institutions | $589,188 | Real Estate | $124,050 |
| Health Professionals | $454,525 | Republican/Conservative | $105,400 |
| Retired | $377,484 | Manufacturing & Distributing | $84,300 |
| Lobbyists | $340,063 | Leadership PACs | $83,750 |
| Hospitals/Nursing Homes | $316,122 | Lawyers/Law Firms | $82,059 |
| Agribusiness | $287,603 | Automotive industry | $68,150 |
| Insurance | $286,675 | Chemical Industry | $58,500 |
| Women's Issues | $277,570 | Health Services/HMOs | $58,000 |
| Leadership PACs | $263,500 | Business Services | $56,493 |

### Debates

A number of United States Senate Debates were held in the 2012 election cycle, but none included more than two of the general election candidates at a time. Incumbent senator Debbie Stabenow did not attend any of them. Before the primary, non-partisan Tea Party groups hosted debates which were open to all candidates, however all but one were attended exclusively by Republican primary candidates. The exception being the Romeo Area Tea Party Forum, on May 21, 2012, which included Scotty Boman after he changed his affiliation from Republican to Libertarian. Republican Pete Hoekstra had originally been scheduled to participate in the debate, but withdrew because he objected to the participation of one of the candidates. The Romeo forum was hosted by WJR AM radio talk show host Frank Beckmann who said the candidate Hoekstra objected to was Boman.
There were debates in Dewitt, Zeeland, and Dearborn which were attended by both Pete Hoekstra and Scotty Boman who both qualified for the general election.
After the primary election, some forums were held which were attended by one of the invited United States Senate Candidates, but only two post-primary debates were held where more than one general election candidate attended: Libertarian Scotty Boman and Green Party candidate Harley Mikkelson attended Forums hosted by the League of Women Voters of Alpena County on October 23, and Gaylord High School on October 24.

#### Controversy about debate qualifications

Since 1996, WGVU and the Detroit Economic Club hosted United States Senate debates that would feature all United States Senate candidates who had met certain qualifications. In 1994 all balloted candidates were included in the televised debate on WKAR, but since then only major party candidates qualified. Pete Hoekstra and Debbie Stabenow had agreed in principle to debate, but failed to reach a consensus on the number of debates. On October 9 Scotty Boman issued a press release in which he claimed polling results qualified him for the debates. On October 11 the Stabenow campaign issued a statement saying she was "…ending the ongoing debate over debates, due to Congressman Hoekstra's refusal to accept the traditional U.S. Senate debates and his constant political attacks.". The Hoekstra campaign responded, "Debbie Stabenow's campaign refused to negotiate in good faith during the entire process."
Hoekstra continued to ask Stabenow to debate him, and attended at least three debates at which he was the only participant. On October 11 he attended a health care debate sponsored by the Independent Choice Network. On October 18 he attended a debate in Midland which was hosted by a group of local business leaders. Scotty Boman offered to participate in the October 18 debate, but Hoekstra Campaign Manager Greg VanWoerkom said it was too late for Boman to participate since he had his chance to debate Hoekstra before the August primary, when he was running as a Republican. At the time Hoekstra was scheduled to debate with Harley Mikkelson, and Boman at Gaylord High School on October 24, but Hoekstra did not attend it. On October 23 Hoekstra held a debate in Kentwood Michigan.
As an alternative to the traditional WGVU debate, the station produced two back to back interviews with Stabenow and Hoekstra.

### Predictions

| Source | Ranking | As of |
| The Cook Political Report | Likely D | November 1, 2012 |
| Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely D | November 5, 2012 |
| Rothenberg Political Report | Safe D | November 2, 2012 |
| Real Clear Politics | Likely D | November 5, 2012 |

### Polling

| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Pete Hoekstra (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | December 3–6, 2010 | 1,224 | ±2.8% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
| EPIC-MRA | February 12–17, 2011 | 600 | ±4.0% | 44% | 42% | — | 14% |
| Public Policy Polling | March 18–20, 2011 | 502 | ±4.4% | 50% | 38% | — | 12% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–24, 2011 | 593 | ±4.0% | 50% | 41% | — | 9% |
| EPIC-MRA | August 13–16, 2011 | 600 | ±4.0% | 47% | 38% | — | 15% |
| EPIC-MRA | November 13–16, 2011 | 600 | ±4.0% | 48% | 42% | — | 10% |
| Wilson Research | January 9–11, 2012 | 601 | ±n/a | 47% | 41% | — | 12% |
| Public Policy Polling | February 10–12, 2012 | 560 | ±4.1% | 51% | 37% | — | 12% |
| NBC News/Marist | February 19–20, 2012 | 3,149 | ±1.8% | 53% | 32% | — | 15% |
| MRG | March 14–19, 2012 | 600 | ±4.4% | 45% | 40% | — | 15% |
| Public Policy Polling | May 24–27, 2012 | 500 | ±4.4% | 53% | 37% | — | 10% |
| EPIC-MRA | June 2–5, 2012 | 600 | ±4.0% | 49% | 38% | — | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports | June 14, 2012 | 500 | ±4.5% | 48% | 39% | 3% | 10% |
| NBC News/Marist | June 24–25, 2012 | 1,078 | ±3.0% | 49% | 37% | — | 14% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–23, 2012 | 579 | ±4.1% | 52% | 38% | — | 10% |
| Rasmussen Reports | July 23, 2012 | 500 | ±4.5% | 46% | 40% | 4% | 10% |
| EPIC-MRA | July 24–31, 2012 | 600 | ±4.0% | 49% | 35% | — | 16% |
| Bouydon-Foster | July 28, 2012 | 1,046 | ±3.03% | 53% | 43% | 5% | 3% |
| Bouydon-Foster | August 16, 2012 | 1,733 | ±2.3% | 46% | 48% | 3% | 5% |
| Detroit News | August 18–20, 2012 | 600 | ±4.0% | 48% | 40% | — | 12% |
| Mitchell Research | August 23, 2012 | 1,277 | ±2.7% | 44% | 45% | — | 11% |
| EPIC-MRA | August 28, 2012 | 1,200 | ±2.6% | 51% | 44% | — | 5% |
| Public Policy Polling | August 31 – September 2, 2012 | 815 | ±3.4% | 50% | 41% | — | 9% |
| EPIC-MRA | September 8–11, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 49% | 38% | — | 13% |
| Baydoun-Foster | September 12, 2012 | 1,156 | ±2.88% | 47% | 42% | 3% | 8% |
| Marketing Resource Group | September 10–15, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 46% | 40% | — | 14% |
| Detroit News | September 15–17, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 50% | 34% | — | 16% |
| Rasmussen Reports | September 20, 2012 | 500 | ±4.5% | 53% | 37% | 3% | 7% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion | September 21–22, 2012 | 804 | ±3.3% | 54% | 40% | 7% | — |
| Baydoun-Foster | October 5, 2012 | 1,122 | ±2.93% | 51% | 43% | 2% | 4% |
| Gravis Marketing | October 5–6, 2012 | 970 | ±3.2% | 48% | 39% | 7% | 6% |
| EPIC-MRA | October 4–6, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 55% | 35% | — | 10% |
| Glengariff | October 6–8, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 50% | 38% | — | 10% |
| Rasmussen Reports | October 11, 2012 | 500 | ±4.5% | 51% | 39% | 3% | 7% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion | October 18–20, 2012 | 551 | ±4.2% | 59% | 39% | 3% | — |
| EPIC-MRA | October 26–29, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 54% | 33% | 4% | 9% |
| Glengariff | October 27–29, 2012 | 600 | ±4% | 52% | 38% | — | 10% |
| Public Policy Polling | October 31 – November 1, 2012 | 500 | ±4.4% | 53% | 40% | — | 7% |
| Baydoun-Foster | November 2, 2012 | 1,913 | ±2.2% | 50% | 43% | 3% | 3% |
| Public Policy Polling | November 1–3, 2012 | 700 | ±3.7% | 55% | 42% | — | 3% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion | November 1–3, 2012 | 502 | ±4.4% | 56% | 43% | 1% | — |
| Mitchell Research | November 4, 2012 | 1,305 | ±2.71% | 55% | 41% | — | 4% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Clark Durant (R) | Other | Undecided |
| EPIC-MRA | November 13–16, 2011 | 600 | ±4.0% | 51% | 31% | — | 18% |
| Public Policy Polling | February 10–12, 2012 | 560 | ±4.14% | 50% | 33% | — | 16% |
| Public Policy Polling | May 24–27, 2012 | 500 | ±4.4% | 53% | 31% | — | 16% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–23, 2012 | 579 | ±4.1% | 51% | 34% | — | 15% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–23, 2012 | 579 | ±4.1% | 51% | 34% | — | 15% |
| Rasmussen Reports | July 23, 2012 | 500 | ±4.5% | 47% | 39% | 4% | 10% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Scotty Boman (L) | Other | Undecided |
| Gravis Marketing | October 5–6, 2012 | 970 | ±3.2% | 49% | 39% | — | 22% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Randy Hekman (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | March 18–20, 2011 | 502 | ±4.4% | 52% | 33% | — | 15% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–24, 2011 | 593 | ±4.0% | 52% | 36% | — | 12% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Peter Konetchy (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–24, 2011 | 593 | ±4.0% | 52% | 31% | — | 18% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Tim Leuliette (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | December 3–6, 2010 | 1,224 | ±2.8% | 47% | 30% | — | 24% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Saul Anuzis (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | March 18–20, 2011 | 502 | ±4.4% | 52% | 35% | — | 13% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | John Engler (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | December 3–6, 2010 | 1,224 | ±2.8% | 49% | 42% | — | 9% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Terri Lynn Land (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | December 3–6, 2010 | 1,224 | ±2.8% | 45% | 41% | — | 14% |
| Public Policy Polling | March 18–20, 2011 | 502 | ±4.4% | 48% | 38% | — | 14% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | John McCulloch (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | July 21–24, 2011 | 593 | ±4.0% | 52% | 32% | — | 16% |
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Debbie Stabenow (D) | Candice Miller (R) | Other | Undecided |
| Public Policy Polling | December 3–6, 2010 | 1,224 | ±2.8% | 43% | 41% | — | 15% |

### Results

United States Senate election in Michigan, 2012 :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% |
| | Democratic | Debbie Stabenow (incumbent) | 2,735,826 | 58.80% | +1.89% |
| | Republican | Pete Hoekstra | 1,767,386 | 37.98% | −3.28% |
| | Libertarian | Scott Boman | 84,480 | 1.82% | +1.11% |
| | Green | Harley Mikkelson | 27,890 | 0.60% | −0.03% |
| | Constitution | Richard Matkin | 26,038 | 0.56% | +0.07% |
| | Natural Law | John Litle | 11,229 | 0.24% | N/A |
| | Write-in | Write-in | 69 | 0.00% | N/A |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 4,652,918 | 100.00% | N/A |
| | Democratic hold | Democratic hold | Democratic hold | Democratic hold | Democratic hold |

#### Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

* Midland (Largest city: Midland)
* Cass (Largest city: Dowagiac)
* Branch (Largest city: Coldwater)
* Charlevoix (Largest city: Boyne City)
* Oceana (Largest city: Hart)

#### Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

* Wexford (Largest city: Cadillac)
* Sanilac (Largest city: Sandusky)

#### By congressional district

Stabenow won 12 of 14 congressional districts, including seven that elected Republicans.
| District | Stabenow | Hoekstra | Representative |
| 1st | 52.3% | 44.4% | Dan Benishek |
| 2nd | 44.7% | 52.2% |
| 2nd | 44.7% | 52.2% | Bill Huizenga |
| 3rd | 48.0% | 48.6% | Justin Amash |
| 4th | 53.0% | 43.6% | Dave Camp |
| 5th | 66.7% | 30.2% | Dale Kildee (112th Congress) |
| 5th | 66.7% | 30.2% | Dan Kildee (113th Congress) |
| 6th | 50.2% | 46.2% | Fred Upton |
| 7th | 53.4% | 43.1% | Tim Walberg |
| 8th | 52.4% | 44.2% | Mike Rogers |
| 9th | 63.0% | 33.5% | Gary Peters (112th Congress) |
| 9th | 63.0% | 33.5% | Sander Levin (113th Congress) |
| 10th | 54.0% | 42.8% | Candice Miller |
| 11th | 51.5% | 45.3% | David Curson (112th Congress) |
| 11th | 51.5% | 45.3% | Kerry Bentivolio (113th Congress) |
| 12th | 69.7% | 26.7% | Sander Levin (112th Congress) |
| 12th | 69.7% | 26.7% | John Dingell (113th Congress) |
| 13th | 86.3% | 11.1% | Hansen Clarke (112th Congress) |
| 13th | 86.3% | 11.1% | John Conyers (113th Congress) |
| 14th | 82.1% | 15.9% | John Conyers (112th Congress) |
| 14th | 82.1% | 15.9% | Gary Peters (113th Congress) |