# Wayside crosses in Romania

Wayside crosses in Romania are a cultural and religious phenomenon.

## Terminology and description

The standard term for the crosses is troiță (pl. troițe); they are also called cruci la răscruci ("crossroads crosses", the northern part of Western Moldavia), răstigniri ("crucifixions", Maramureș), icoane ("icons", Vâlcea County), rugi ("stakes", Ținutul Pădurenilor [ro], Hunedoara County), cruci ("crosses", Transylvania and Oltenia), lemne ("wood beams", in old documents). Troiță is a word of Slavic origin, signifying three joined crosses, associated with the Holy Trinity.
The crosses are a feature of the village landscape, where they were built for divine protection in places thought dangerous. They were meant to preserve the natural order; merely looking at one would confirm the presence of God. The cross is usually made of hardwood, painted on one or both sides. More rarely, they are carved with solar motifs. Some are made of stone or metal. With time and technological advance, simple designs gave way to complex elements.

## Symbolic considerations

The crosses recall a pre-Christian time when people would set up ritual columns or altars in places where the cosmic peace was disturbed by evil spirits, hoping to restore order. Crossroads have also been attracted mystical powers since antiquity; their mythological significance acquired a religious one with the adoption of Christianity, given their cross shape. Columns and poles gave way to crosses, so that the troiță represents “an ad hoc synthesis between the ancient and Christian strata”.
According to Romulus Vulcănescu [ro], the troiță is "the most primitive extant form of religious sanctuary and sacred popular worship". He defines a sanctuary as a place proclaimed holy and respected as such by the people, out of magical, mythical or religious motives. These objects are found in the village center, at the village entrance and exit, at crossroads, unclean places, hillocks and, generally speaking, where the physical and spiritual worlds merge.
Often, the crosses are surrounded by a shelter, with a door towards the road and windows at the sides. Travelers hit by rainstorms can wait inside. In the past, where the water source was farther away, villagers would leave a pitcher of fresh water for passersby. Shelters are rarer in hay and mountain areas; the crosses there are usually covered by tile roofs. The shelters, which form a sort of chapel, are usually painted on the exterior and interior. Christ Pantocrator or the Trinity is on the ceiling, flanked by the Four Evangelists, angels or prophets. Saints and angels are found lower down, with empty spaces filled by grape leaves, ears of wheat, floral or geometric patterns. The exterior might feature medallions of saints or Biblical scenes. Inscriptions appear painted on the inside or carved into the cross.
The magic associations of water means that crosses are found near streams, bridges and wells, superstition holding that well bottoms can hold evil forces. The troiță, pointing heavenward, guards against the dark forces in the depths of the earth. Crosses at village entrances served to guard the locals from plagues and enemies, and were also landmarks. Homeowners would raise crosses in front of their dwellings, seeking spiritual protection. Cemetery troițe do not commemorate the dead, instead watching the boundary between living and dead, amplifying the power of the cross symbol. Finally, a troiță can be a cenotaph, celebrating war heroes whose bodies have not been found, or other dead buried elsewhere.

## World War I crosses

A particular type of troiță proliferated in interwar Greater Romania: that dedicated to the fallen soldiers of World War I, and promoted by the Cultul Eroilor memorial society. With the majority of soldiers coming from rural areas, it was considered an appropriate way to commemorate the peasant-soldier hero. In 1921, Gala Galaction wrote of the crosses’ aptness for marking scattered graves “which will never be able to be gathered together”. Another writer likened them to “beings kneeling in prayer”, protecting “this sacred land hallowed by the most precious Romanian blood and bodies”.
The designers sought to integrate the crosses into their surroundings, as was the case with the ones set up in the military cemeteries near Curtea de Argeș Monastery and in Sinaia. By 1931, a number had been erected in small, new military cemeteries. Additionally, as noted in a 1926 article, troițe were placed on the battlefields where troops had died. At times, proposed crosses drew objections from local authorities. For example, at Odorhei in 1934, local politicians argued that placing a donated troiță in the city center would damage its aesthetics; it was instead relegated to the yard of the Gendarmerie school.
A number of troițe were dedicated to historical figures during the period. In 1925, one recalling Michael the Brave was unveiled on the site of the Battle of Șelimbăr near Sibiu; a lavish ceremony was organized by ASTRA and led by Nicolae Bălan. From the following year, another cross marked his grave at Turda. Others so honored include Tudor Vladimirescu (Bucharest), Ilie Măcelar (Sibiu) and Aurel Vlaicu (Bănești, Prahova, near the site of his airplane crash). In 1934, Cultul Eroilor donated a concrete cross to Cercetașii României, unveiled during their jamboree at Mamaia in the presence of King Carol II. Throughout the 1920s and ‘30s, the society sent oak and concrete crosses to places around Romania, making efforts to include communities that struggled financially. Thus, alongside the standard monument, the troiță became an accepted way to honor the war dead.

## Historiography

The troiță has been a subject of academic study since the early 20th century. Tudor Pamfile included drawings of the crosses in a 1910 work. Nicolae Iorga considered them as "cheap establishments of believers who lacked the means to show their faith by raising churches"; he added, "at their origins, they were, I believe, something else". They also preoccupied Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcaș (1909, 1928), Grigore Ionescu [ro], Tache Papahagi, and particularly George Oprescu, who called them "curious and impressive expressions of faith" that also satisfied "the remaining pagan superstition" left in the collective consciousness.
It was Vulcănescu who undertook the most thorough research into the phenomenon. His 1947 study Funcțiunea magică a troiței remains a standard reference. In 1972, he substantially expanded his findings in Coloana cerului. In 2003, Ionel Oprișan published Troițe Românești. O tipologie. There, he proposed a classification drawing on Vulcănescu: sacred pre-Christian monuments (heavenly columns and poles), sacred Christian monuments (cross-shaped, icon-bearing and boundary troițe. Further research continued into the 21st century, with a particular focus on Mărginimea Sibiului.

## List

The following wayside crosses are listed as historic monuments by Romania's Ministry of Culture and Religious Affairs. Nearly all are associated with the Romanian Orthodox faith.
| Location | County | Date | Dedication |
| Bucium | Alba | 1802 | |
| Gura Izbitei | Alba | 1897 | Andrei Șaguna |
| Sartăș | Alba | 20th century | |
| Șibot | Alba | 1899 | |
| Dezna | Arad | 1827 | |
| Dezna | Arad | 1841 | |
| Hălmagiu | Arad | 1934 | World War I dead |
| Iosășel | Arad | 1934 | Ioan Buteanu |
| Neudorf | Arad | 1841 | |
| Săud | Bihor | early 20th century | World War I dead |
| Brașov | Brașov | 1810 | Junii Brașoveni (Bătrâni) |
| Brașov | Brașov | 19th century | Junii Brașoveni (Roșiori) |
| Brașov | Brașov | 1748, repaired 1901 | Ilie Birt (founder) |
| Brașov | Brașov | 1887 | |
| Brașov | Brașov | 1762 | Ilie Birt (founder) |
| Săcele | Brașov | 18th century | |
| Săcele | Brașov | 19th century | |
| Săcele | Brașov | 1918 | |
| Oțelu Roșu | Caraș-Severin | 19th century | |
| Oțelu Roșu | Caraș-Severin | 1922-1925 | World War I dead |
| Beliș | Cluj | | Peasants shot in autumn 1918 |
| Cluj-Napoca | Cluj | 1940 | Albert Szenczi Molnár |
| Adânca | Dâmbovița | mid-19th century | |
| Mislea | Dâmbovița | 19th century | |
| Răzvad | Dâmbovița | 19th century | |
| Țuglui | Dolj | 19th century | |
| Câlnic | Gorj | 1916-1919 | World War I dead |
| Rasovița | Gorj | 20th century | |
| Almaș-Săliște | Hunedoara | 1942-1945 | Romanian soldiers |
| Boiu de Jos | Hunedoara | 1916-1918 | World War I dead |
| Buceș | Hunedoara | 1934 | |
| Crișcior | Hunedoara | 1934 | Revolt of Horea, Cloșca and Crișan |
| Curechiu | Hunedoara | 1934 | |
| Mesteacăn | Hunedoara | 1934 | |
| Mihăileni | Hunedoara | 1934 | Revolt of Horea, Cloșca and Crișan, 1848 Revolution |
| Ribița | Hunedoara | 1934 | |
| Berbești | Maramureș | 18th century | |
| Ieud | Maramureș | 1935 | |
| Mireșu Mare | Maramureș | 1940 | World War I dead |
| Someș-Uileac | Maramureș | 1946 | World War I and II dead |
| Stoiceni | Maramureș | 1938 | World War I dead |
| Baia de Aramă | Mehedinți | | |
| Bâlvănești | Mehedinți | | |
| Drobeta-Turnu Severin | Mehedinți | 1916-1918 | |
| Godeanu | Mehedinți | | |
| Marga | Mehedinți | | |
| Prejna | Mehedinți | | |
| Strehaia | Mehedinți | | |
| Șiroca | Mehedinți | | |
| Dăneasa | Olt | | |
| Făgețelu | Olt | 19th century | |
| Iancu Jianu | Olt | 19th century | |
| Izvoru | Olt | 19th century | |
| Oboga | Olt | | |
| Fântânele | Sibiu | 19th century | |
| Rășinari | Sibiu | 1883 | |
| Rod | Sibiu | 1871 | |
| Rod | Sibiu | 1877 | |
| Săliște | Sibiu | 19th century | |
| Sibiel | Sibiu | 1803 | |
| Sibiel | Sibiu | 1814 | |
| Șelimbăr | Sibiu | 1925 | Battle of Șelimbăr and World War I dead |
| Tilișca | Sibiu | 19th century | |
| Turnu Roșu | Sibiu | 18th century | |
| Bătinești | Vrancea | 1924 | German World War I dead |
| Cârligele | Vrancea | 1933 | World War I dead |
| Hăulișca | Vrancea | 1937 | World War I dead |
| Poienița | Vrancea | 1936 | World War I dead |
| Prisaca | Vrancea | 1941 | Independence War and World War I dead |
| Source: |