# 2020 Colorado Proposition 114

"none" is preferred when the title is already sufficiently detailed; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Elections in Colorado :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential caucuses and primaries
Democratic
2000
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1876
1879
1883 sp
1885
1889
1891
1895
1897
1901
1903
1907
1909
1913
1913 sp
1914
1918
1920
1924
1924 sp
1926
1930
1932
1932 sp
1936
1938
1942
1942 sp
1944
1948
1950
1954
1956
1960
1962
1966
1968
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
2028
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1927
1st sp
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
3rd sp
1941
4th sp
1942
1944
1st sp
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1983
6th sp
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
4th sp :
State government
General elections
2010
2014
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Secretary of State elections
2022
Attorney General elections
2014
2018
2022
Treasurer elections
2022
Colorado State Board of Regent elections
2016
Senate elections
2013 (recall)
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures
List of Colorado ballot measures
1893
2
1972
8
1974
1
1982
1
1992
2
2000
20
2004
36
2006
38
41
42
43
44
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
2008
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
54
58
59
L
2010
62
2012
64
2018
A
2020
B
C
EE
113
114
2022
125
126
FF
2023
HH
II
2024
79
80
I
J
127
128
129
131 :
Colorado Springs
Local elections
2019
Mayoral elections
1995
1997 sp
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Denver
Mayoral elections
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
El Paso County
Local elections
2018 :
Pueblo
Mayoral elections
2023–24 :
vte :
Colorado Proposition 114 (also the Reintroduction and Management of Gray Wolves Proposition, and formerly Initiative #107) was a ballot measure that was approved in Colorado in the November 2020 elections. It was a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf back into the state. The proposition was passed with a narrow margin, making Colorado the first US state to pass legislation to reintroduce wildlife.

## Background and proposal

Gray wolves are native to North America, including Colorado and were once present across the state. Overhunting of common prey (especially elk) and an increase in livestock numbers forced them into conflict with ranchers. Wolves were hunted, trapped and poisoned into local extinction by the 1940s.
The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission rejected a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf in 2016, citing the potential impact on big game and livestock ranching in the state as well as the fact that the national gray wolf population elsewhere had already exceeded federal conservation goals. Resolutions by the Commission opposing reintroduction had also been passed in 1982 and 1989.
Proposition 114 was instigated through ballot initiative as Initiative #107. Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund claimed in December 2019 that they had gathered 211,000 signatures in support of Initiative #107. In January 2020 it was confirmed that the initiative had collected 139,333 valid signatures, above the 124,632 signatures needed to be included in the 2020 elections.
Proposition 114 directs the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to:
* Develop plans to begin to reintroduce and manage gray wolves in designated areas in Colorado west of the Continental Divide by December 31, 2023.
* Hold hearings across the state on scientific, economic and social considerations.
* Periodically update the plan using public input.
* Use state funds to help livestock owners adapt to prevent conflict with wolf populations, and to pay fair compensation for livestock losses to gray wolves.
Almost all the potential core wolf habitat is in the west of Colorado, in or to the west of the Southern Rocky Mountains, whereas the state's most populous areas are more to the east. The proposals were estimated to cost between $5 million and $6 million over six years.

## Campaign
### Support

The Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund led the campaign in support of Proposition 114.
It was argued that wolves would "restore Colorado's natural balance", and that reintroduction was needed to counter the effects of the gray wolf's protections under the Endangered Species Act being removed in October 2020. Mike Phillips, a wolf biologist, said that having gray wolves in Colorado again would "serve as the archstone" in connecting wolf populations to the north and south.

#### Endorsements

Individuals
* Dominique Jackson, member of the Colorado House of Representatives for District 42
* Leilani Munter, environmental activist and former racing driver
* Mike Phillips, member of the Montana Senate and wolf biologist
Newspapers
* Denver Post
* Boulder Weekly
* Colorado Springs Independent
Organisations
* Colorado Sierra Club
* In Defense of Animals
* Oceanic Preservation Society
* Our Revolution
* Working Families Party

### Opposition

Stop The Wolf PAC led the campaign against Proposition 114.
It was argued that the proposition would have negative effects on ranchers like past propositions, such as one in the 1990s which banned hunting by trapping, snare or poison. Some opponents of the proposition argued that wolves should naturally repopulate the state rather than state agencies interfering.
By October 2020, 39 of Colorado's 64 counties adopted resolutions opposing the measure.

#### Endorsements

Individuals
* Bob Beauprez, former member of the U.S. House of Representatives for Colorado's 7th district (2003–2007)
* Ted Harvey, former member of the Colorado Senate (2007–2015) and the Colorado House of Representatives (2001–2006)
* Mark Hillman, former State Senator (1998–2005) and former Colorado State Treasurer (2005–2006)
* Ted Nugent, singer-songwriter
Newspapers
* Colorado Springs Gazette
* Fort Morgan Times
* Journal-Advocate
* Steamboat Pilot & Today
* Sentinel Colorado
Organisations
* Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation
* Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
* Safari Club International

### Neutral

* League of Women Voters Colorado

## Results
### Statewide

Proposition 114 :
| Choice | Votes | % |
| Yes | 1,590,299 | 50.91 |
| No | 1,533,313 | 49.09 |
| Valid votes | 3,123,612 | 94.89 |
| Invalid or blank votes | 168,049 | 5.11 |
| Total votes | 3,291,661 | 100.00 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 4,211,531 | 78.16 |

### By county

| County | Yes votes | No votes | Yes (%) | No (%) | Valid votes | Turnout (%) |
| Adams | 117,002 | 107,937 | 52.01% | 47.99% | 224,939 | 75.58% |
| Alamosa | 2,853 | 4,728 | 37.63% | 62.37% | 7,581 | 72.45% |
| Arapahoe | 178,704 | 155,486 | 53.47% | 46.53% | 334,190 | 77.07% |
| Archuleta | 3,119 | 5,638 | 35.62% | 64.38% | 8,757 | 76.82% |
| Baca | 394 | 1,724 | 18.60% | 81.40% | 2,118 | 75.72% |
| Bent | 743 | 1,457 | 33.77% | 66.23% | 2,200 | 68.73% |
| Boulder | 132,607 | 62,955 | 67.81% | 32.19% | 195,562 | 81.68% |
| Broomfield | 24,774 | 20,147 | 55.15% | 44.85% | 44,921 | 82.49% |
| Chaffee | 5,861 | 7,439 | 44.07% | 55.93% | 13,300 | 81.29% |
| Cheyenne | 221 | 891 | 19.87% | 80.13% | 1,112 | 80.25% |
| Clear Creek | 3,162 | 3,226 | 49.50% | 50.50% | 6,388 | 76.93% |
| Conejos | 1,064 | 3,079 | 25.68% | 74.32% | 4,143 | 79.07% |
| Costilla | 922 | 1,004 | 47.87% | 52.13% | 1,926 | 70.69% |
| Crowley | 540 | 1,156 | 31.84% | 68.16% | 1,696 | 74.93% |
| Custer | 1,160 | 2,373 | 32.83% | 67.17% | 3,533 | 82.21% |
| Delta | 4,668 | 14,194 | 24.75% | 75.25% | 18,862 | 81.95% |
| Denver | 249,877 | 126,776 | 66.34% | 33.66% | 376,653 | 76.24% |
| Dolores | 302 | 1,119 | 21.25% | 78.75% | 1,421 | 76.40% |
| Douglas | 100,221 | 121,816 | 45.14% | 54.86% | 222,037 | 84.43% |
| Eagle | 13,067 | 14,987 | 46.58% | 53.42% | 28,054 | 77.53% |
| El Paso | 185,854 | 177,977 | 51.08% | 48.92% | 363,831 | 74.15% |
| Elbert | 5,383 | 13,210 | 28.95% | 71.05% | 18,593 | 84.37% |
| Fremont | 9,308 | 15,573 | 37.41% | 62.59% | 24,881 | 77.76% |
| Garfield | 11,039 | 18,974 | 36.78% | 63.22% | 30,013 | 76.73% |
| Gilpin | 1,965 | 2,167 | 47.56% | 52.44% | 4,132 | 74.96% |
| Grand | 3,424 | 6,135 | 35.82% | 64.18% | 9,559 | 75.56% |
| Gunnison | 4,676 | 6,201 | 42.99% | 57.01% | 10,877 | 78.15% |
| Hinsdale | 174 | 439 | 28.38% | 71.62% | 613 | 80.71% |
| Huerfano | 1,851 | 2,403 | 43.51% | 56.49% | 4,254 | 76.99% |
| Jackson | 112 | 747 | 13.04% | 86.96% | 859 | 69.89% |
| Jefferson | 185,173 | 177,016 | 51.13% | 48.87% | 362,189 | 83.01% |
| Kiowa | 148 | 726 | 16.93% | 83.07% | 874 | 84.17% |
| Kit Carson | 754 | 2,984 | 20.17% | 79.83% | 3,738 | 76.53% |
| La Plata | 18,015 | 16,140 | 52.74% | 47.26% | 34,155 | 73.83% |
| Lake | 1,767 | 2,063 | 46.14% | 53.86% | 3,830 | 67.75% |
| Larimer | 111,344 | 104,020 | 51.70% | 48.30% | 215,364 | 80.73% |
| Las Animas | 3,034 | 4,633 | 39.57% | 60.43% | 7,667 | 69.08% |
| Lincoln | 549 | 2,024 | 21.34% | 78.66% | 2,573 | 77.65% |
| Logan | 2,686 | 7,538 | 26.27% | 73.73% | 10,224 | 79.49% |
| Mesa | 26,808 | 61,004 | 30.53% | 69.47% | 87,812 | 76.85% |
| Mineral | 200 | 537 | 27.14% | 72.86% | 737 | 81.86% |
| Moffat | 1,147 | 5,699 | 16.75% | 83.25% | 6,846 | 72.76% |
| Montezuma | 5,529 | 9,492 | 36.81% | 63.19% | 15,021 | 73.45% |
| Montrose | 5,730 | 18,414 | 23.73% | 76.27% | 24,144 | 80.65% |
| Morgan | 3,990 | 9,331 | 29.95% | 70.05% | 13,321 | 75.71% |
| Otero | 3,270 | 6,054 | 35.07% | 64.93% | 9,324 | 74.22% |
| Ouray | 1,836 | 2,056 | 47.17% | 52.83% | 3,892 | 82.52% |
| Park | 4,575 | 7,356 | 38.35% | 61.65% | 11,931 | 76.47% |
| Phillips | 541 | 1,853 | 22.60% | 77.40% | 2,394 | 73.86% |
| Pitkin | 6,976 | 4,330 | 61.70% | 38.30% | 11,306 | 79.48% |
| Prowers | 1,473 | 3,891 | 27.46% | 72.54% | 5,364 | 72.66% |
| Pueblo | 41,430 | 43,796 | 48.61% | 51.39% | 85,226 | 74.58% |
| Rio Blanco | 439 | 3,164 | 12.18% | 87.82% | 3,603 | 77.89% |
| Rio Grande | 1,838 | 4,306 | 29.92% | 70.08% | 6,144 | 74.39% |
| Routt | 6,005 | 10,297 | 36.84% | 63.16% | 16,302 | 79.33% |
| Saguache | 1,532 | 1,710 | 47.25% | 52.75% | 3,242 | 72.77% |
| San Juan | 300 | 231 | 56.50% | 43.50% | 531 | 73.96% |
| San Miguel | 3,140 | 1,774 | 63.90% | 36.10% | 4,914 | 77.88% |
| Sedgwick | 357 | 1,027 | 25.79% | 74.21% | 1,384 | 76.81% |
| Summit | 9,593 | 8,036 | 54.42% | 45.58% | 17,629 | 72.95% |
| Teller | 6,871 | 9,592 | 41.74% | 58.26% | 16,463 | 77.56% |
| Washington | 497 | 2,429 | 16.99% | 83.01% | 2,926 | 82.24% |
| Weld | 66,806 | 93,915 | 41.57% | 58.43% | 160,721 | 77.62% |
| Yuma | 899 | 3,917 | 18.67% | 81.33% | 4,816 | 81.32% |

## Aftermath

In the 2021 regular session of the Colorado Legislature, HB21-1037 was introduced by Representative Matt Soper and Senators Bob Rankin and Ray Scott. The bill sought to limit the areas where the wolves are reintroduced into, to those which voted for Proposition 114 and those which are not home to animals which are the prey of gray wolves and designated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife to be threatened or endangered. A non-partisan analysis from legislative staff commented that the bill "would appear to rule out any reintroduction". The bill failed to progress from the Colorado House Energy and Environment Committee in February 2021.
The first phase of public involvement in reintroduction efforts was undertaken from July to August 2021, including a schedule of over 40 meetings and focus groups.