# 2016 South Dakota Democratic presidential primary

Elections in South Dakota :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2016
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1889
1891
1894
1897
1901
1903
1903 sp
1907
1909
1913
1914
1918
1920
1924
1926
1930
1932
1936
1938
1938 sp
1942
1944
1948
1950
1954
1956
1960
1962
1966
1968
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
U.S. House elections
1889
1890
1891
AL sp
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
AL sp
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
AL sp
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022 :
State government
General elections
2010
2014
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1889
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Secretary of State elections
2022
Attorney General elections
2018
2022
Senate elections
2020
2022
House of Representatives elections
2020
2022 :
Ballot measures
2006
Amendment C
2008
Measure 9
Measure 10
2020
Amendment A
Measure 26
2024
Amendment E
Amendment G
Amendment H :
Sioux Falls
City elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Mayoral elections
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022 :
Rapid City
City elections
2020
2022
2024
2026
Mayoral elections
2022 :
Pierre
City elections
2020
2022
2024
2026
Mayoral elections
2022 :
vte :
The 2016 South Dakota Democratic presidential primary was held on June 7 in the U.S. state of South Dakota as one of the Democratic Party's primaries ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
The Democratic Party's primaries in California, Montana, New Jersey and New Mexico were held the same day, as are Republican primaries in the same five states, including their own South Dakota primary. Additionally, the Democratic Party held North Dakota caucuses the same day.

## Opinion polling

| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | Others / Undecided |
| Official Primary results | June 7, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 51.0% | Bernie Sanders 49.0% | |
| Targeted Persuasion Margin of error: ±3.31% Sample size: 874 | May 23–24, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 50% | Bernie Sanders 47% | Undecided 3% |
* v
* t
* e

## Results

South Dakota Democratic primary, June 7, 2016 :
| Candidate | Popular vote | Popular vote | Estimated delegates | Estimated delegates | Estimated delegates |
| Candidate | Count | Percentage | Pledged | Unpledged | Total |
| Hillary Clinton | 27,047 | 51.03% | 10 | 2 | 12 |
| Bernie Sanders | 25,959 | 48.97% | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Uncommitted | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Total | 53,006 | 100% | 20 | 5 | 25 |
| Source: ||||||

### Results by county

| County | Clinton | Votes | Sanders | Votes |
| Aurora | 53.19% | 150 | 46.81% | 132 |
| Beadle | 57.32% | 501 | 42.68% | 373 |
| Bennett | 43.79% | 74 | 56.21% | 95 |
| Bon Homme | 53.32% | 225 | 46.68% | 197 |
| Brookings | 51.45% | 955 | 48.55% | 901 |
| Brown | 54.61% | 1,369 | 45.39% | 1,138 |
| Brule | 45.39% | 182 | 54.61% | 219 |
| Buffalo | 60.77% | 110 | 39.23% | 71 |
| Butte | 37.03% | 167 | 62.97% | 284 |
| Campbell | 43.48% | 20 | 56.52% | 26 |
| Charles Mix | 51.40% | 293 | 48.60% | 277 |
| Clark | 56.57% | 112 | 43.43% | 86 |
| Clay | 50.57% | 623 | 49.43% | 609 |
| Codington | 56.21% | 828 | 43.79% | 645 |
| Corson | 43.73% | 115 | 56.27% | 148 |
| Custer | 47.02% | 245 | 52.98% | 276 |
| Davison | 55.19% | 542 | 44.81% | 440 |
| Day | 62.82% | 343 | 37.18% | 203 |
| Deuel | 59.34% | 162 | 40.66% | 111 |
| Dewey | 34.61% | 181 | 65.39% | 342 |
| Douglas | 56.47% | 48 | 43.53% | 37 |
| Edmunds | 52.31% | 170 | 47.69% | 155 |
| Fall River | 40.51% | 207 | 59.49% | 304 |
| Faulk | 52.44% | 86 | 47.56% | 78 |
| Grant | 55.76% | 528 | 44.24% | 419 |
| Gregory | 52.19% | 179 | 47.81% | 164 |
| Haakon | 30.26% | 23 | 69.74% | 53 |
| Hamlin | 59.15% | 181 | 40.85% | 125 |
| Hand | 51.72% | 105 | 48.28% | 98 |
| Hanson | 53.89% | 97 | 46.11% | 83 |
| Harding | 25.93% | 14 | 74.07% | 40 |
| Hughes | 51.92% | 528 | 48.08% | 489 |
| Hutchinson | 54.71% | 151 | 45.29% | 125 |
| Hyde | 60.61% | 40 | 39.39% | 26 |
| Jackson | 46.09% | 59 | 53.91% | 69 |
| Jerauld | 59.63% | 96 | 40.37% | 65 |
| Jones | 39.22% | 20 | 60.78% | 31 |
| Kingsbury | 55.07% | 201 | 44.93% | 164 |
| Lake | 51.49% | 484 | 48.51% | 456 |
| Lawrence | 42.83% | 705 | 57.17% | 941 |
| Lincoln | 55.49% | 1,436 | 44.51% | 1,152 |
| Lyman | 50.00% | 115 | 50.00% | 115 |
| Marshall | 62.94% | 287 | 37.06% | 169 |
| McCook | 61.85% | 214 | 38.15% | 132 |
| McPherson | 50.54% | 47 | 49.46% | 46 |
| Meade | 43.27% | 530 | 56.73% | 695 |
| Mellette | 39.68% | 50 | 60.32% | 76 |
| Miner | 56.48% | 109 | 43.52% | 84 |
| Minnehaha | 53.22% | 6,018 | 46.78% | 5,290 |
| Moody | 55.86% | 262 | 44.14% | 207 |
| Oglala Lakota | 42.54% | 425 | 57.46% | 574 |
| Pennington | 45.85% | 3,384 | 54.15% | 3,996 |
| Perkins | 31.62% | 43 | 68.38% | 93 |
| Potter | 52.21% | 59 | 47.79% | 54 |
| Roberts | 49.68% | 392 | 50.32% | 397 |
| Sanborn | 59.46% | 66 | 40.54% | 45 |
| Spink | 58.47% | 283 | 41.53% | 201 |
| Stanley | 48.22% | 95 | 51.78% | 102 |
| Sully | 42.05% | 37 | 57.95% | 51 |
| Todd | 43.78% | 408 | 56.22% | 524 |
| Tripp | 48.06% | 136 | 51.94% | 147 |
| Turner | 56.59% | 232 | 43.41% | 178 |
| Union | 55.39% | 380 | 44.61% | 306 |
| Walworth | 51.05% | 121 | 48.95% | 116 |
| Yankton | 54.90% | 706 | 45.10% | 580 |
| Ziebach | 41.07% | 92 | 58.93% | 132 |
| Total | 51.03% | 27,047 | 48.97% | 25,959 |
Source:

## Analysis

South Dakota, a predominantly white and rural state in the Great Plains with a significant Native American population, was split near evenly between Clinton and Sanders in terms of geography and delegate count. Secretary Clinton carried the eastern portion of the state, with the exception of Roberts County in the northeast corner. She edged out Sanders in Minnehaha County, the most populated county and home to Sioux Falls. Lincoln County (Canton), Brown County (Aberdeen), Brookings County (Brookings), Codington County, (Watertown), Yankton County (Yankton, South Dakota), Davison County (Mitchell), and Hughes County (home to the state capital Pierre), all gave Clinton substantial margins that were enough for her to carry one of the most Republican states in the country.
Senator Bernie Sanders kept the race close by winning the western portion, which is far more rural than the eastern half and tends to vote more Republican in presidential elections. The most populated county in the region and second most populous in the state, Pennington County, home to Rapid City, gave Sanders an 8.3% margin over Clinton. Sanders also carried the counties of Oglala Lakota, Jackson, and Bennett, which are part of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. These counties are among the most poverty stricken in the United States (as Sanders tends to do well among voters with low incomes), with the census-designated place of Allen in Bennett County being considered the poorest municipality in the entire country. Sanders also carried several other Native American reservations including neighboring Rosebud Indian Reservation to the east, the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation to the north, and its neighbor Standing Rock Indian Reservation, part of which stretches into North Dakota.
Sanders had visited the Pine Ridge reservation in May, where he spoke to residents and was warmly welcomed by Native American tribal leaders, talking about the need to improve health care and education on reservations and maintain tribal sovereignty. Other issues brought up by Sanders including the Keystone Pipeline and fracking, which many Native Americans had expressed opposition towards. Another likely reason for the large amount of Native American support for Sanders was towards a controversial comment Secretary Clinton made in April after Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee where she stated, "I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation in the way they behave and how they speak." The remarks were considered offensive by many people, and likely benefitted Sanders (though Clinton appeared to do well among Native Americans in New Mexico the same day).