# 2016 Texas Democratic presidential primary

Elections in Texas :
General elections
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1848
1852
1856
1860
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate
1846
1847
1851
1853
1857
1859
1859 sp
1870
1871
1875
1876
1881
1882
1887
1888
1892 sp
1893
1894
1899
1901
1905
1907
1911
1913
1913 sp
1916
1918
1922
1924
1928
1930
1934
1936
1940
1941 sp
1942
1946
1948
1952
1954
1957 sp
1958
1960
1961 sp
1964
1966
1970
1972
1976
1978
1982
1984
1988
1990
1993 sp
1994
1996
2000
2002
2006
2008
2012
2014
2018
2020
2024
2026
U.S. House of Representatives
1846
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1866
1869
1870
1871
1872
1874
1876
1878
1879
6th sp
1880
1882
1884
1886
1887
2nd sp
1888
1890
1892
9th sp
1894
1896
11th sp
1898
1900
1901
6th sp
1902
4th sp
1903
8th sp
1904
1905
8th sp
1906
1908
1910
1912
1913
10th sp
1914
1916
1918
1919
12th sp
1920
1922
13th sp
1924
1926
1928
1930
17th sp
1931
14th sp
1932
1933
7th sp
8th sp
15th sp
1934
1936
1937
10th sp
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
6th sp
1947
9th sp
16th sp
1948
15th sp
1950
18th sp
1951
13th sp
1952
7th sp
1954
1956
1958
1960
1961
20th sp
1962
4th sp
13th sp
1963
10th sp
1964
1966
8th sp
1968
3rd sp
1970
1972
1974
1976
1st sp
22nd sp
1978
1980
1982
1983
6th sp
1984
1985
1st sp
1986
1988
1989
12th sp
18th sp
1990
1991
3rd sp
1992
1994
1996
1997
28th sp
1998
2000
2002
2003
19th sp
2004
2006
22nd
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
27th sp
2020
2021
6th sp
2022
34th sp
2024
18th sp :
State government
Gubernatorial elections
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1866
1866
1869
1873
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Attorney General elections
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Comptroller elections
2010
2014
2018
2022
Senate elections
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Constitutional amendments
1972
2005
2007
2021
2023 :
Austin
Mayoral elections
2003
2006
2009
2012
2014
2018
2022
2024
Austin municipal elections
2022
2024 :
Corpus Christi
Mayoral elections
2012
2014
2016
2017 sp
2018
2020 :
Dallas–Fort Worth
Arlington mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
Dallas mayoral elections
1856
1857
1875
1904
1925
1961
1963
1965
1995
1999
2002 sp
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
Dallas municipal elections
2015
2019
2021
Fort Worth mayoral elections
2003
2007
2009
2011
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
Denton mayoral elections
2020
2022
Plano municipal elections
2017
2019
2021 :
El Paso
Mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2009
2013
2017
2020
2024
Municipal elections
2017
2020
2024 :
Houston
Mayoral elections
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2019
2023
Municipal elections
2005
2007
2009 :
Laredo
Mayoral elections
2018
2022 :
Lubbock
Mayoral elections
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
San Antonio
Mayoral elections
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025 :
Government :
vte :
The 2016 Texas Democratic presidential primary took place on March 1 in the U.S. state of Texas as one of the Democratic Party's primaries ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
On the same day, dubbed "Super Tuesday," Democratic primaries were held in ten other states plus American Samoa, while the Republican Party held primaries in eleven states, including their own Texas primary.
Decisive support from Latinos—particularly in the rural Rio Grande Valley—delivered a landslide win to Clinton.

## Opinion polling

| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
| Primary results | March 1, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 65.2% | Bernie Sanders 33.2% | | Others 1.6% |
| Emerson Margin of error: ± 5.9% Sample size: 275 | February 26–28, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 68% | Bernie Sanders 26% | | Others / Undecided 6% |
| American Research Group Margin of error: ± 5.0% Sample size: 400 | February 26–28, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 58% | Bernie Sanders 38% | | Others / Undecided 4% |
| YouGov/CBS News Margin of error: ± 6.9% Sample size: 750 | February 22–26, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 61% | Bernie Sanders 37% | | Others / Undecided 2% |
| Monmouth Margin of error: ± 5.6 Sample size: 304 | February 22–24, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 64% | Bernie Sanders 30% | | Others / Undecided 6% |
| Emerson College Margin of error: ± 5.4 Sample size: 328 | February 21–23, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 56% | Bernie Sanders 40% | | Others / Undecided 4% |
| NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Margin of error: ± 4.9 Sample size: 405 | February 18–23, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 59% | Bernie Sanders 38% | | Others / Undecided 3% |
| KTVT-CBS 11 Margin of error: ± 3.8 Sample size: 675 | February 22, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 61% | Bernie Sanders 29% | | Others / Undecided 10% |
| TEGNA/SurveyUSA Margin of error: ± 4.1 Sample size: 569 | February 21–22, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 61% | Bernie Sanders 32% | | Others / Undecided 7% |
| Austin American-Statesman Margin of error: ± 5.0 Sample size: 411 | February 19–22, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 66% | Bernie Sanders 26% | | Others / Undecided 8% |
| UT/TT Margin of error: ±4.57 Sample Size: ? Dem Voters | February 12–19, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 57% | Bernie Sanders 40% | Rocky de la Fuente 2% | Martin O'Malley 1% Willie Wilson 1% |
| Public Policy Polling Margin of error: ± 4.3 Sample size: 514 | February 14–16, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 57% | Bernie Sanders 34% | | |
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
| University of Texas/Texas Tribune Margin of error ± 4.57% Sample Size: 459 | October 30 – November 8, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 61% | Bernie Sanders 30% | Martin O'Malley 1% | Lawrence Lessig 0% No Opinion 7% |
| CBS-DFW Margin of error: ± 3.09% Sample size: 1008 | October 23–24, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 59% | Bernie Sanders 10% | Martin O'Malley 3% | Undecided 28% |
| Texas Lyceum Margin of error: ± 7.15% Sample size: 185 | September 8–21, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 36% | Bernie Sanders 24% | Joe Biden 15% | Jim Webb 1%, Martin O'Malley 0%, Lincoln Chafee 0% Undecided 23% |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 4.58% Sample size: 457 | June 5–14, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 53% | Bernie Sanders 15% | Joe Biden 8% | Elizabeth Warren 8%, Andrew Cuomo 1%, Martin O'Malley 1%, Jim Webb 1%, Lincoln Chafee 1% Undecided 12% |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 4.89% Sample size: 401 | February 6–15, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 62% | Elizabeth Warren 12% | Joe Biden 6% | Bernie Sanders 5%, Martin O'Malley 1%, Jim Webb 1%, Undecided 14% |
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 4.73% Sample size: 429 | October 10–19, 2014 | Hillary Clinton 60% | Elizabeth Warren 13% | Joe Biden 10% | Andrew Cuomo 2%, Brian Schweitzer 1%, Jim Webb 1%, Martin O'Malley 0%, Undecided 13% |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 4.75% Sample size: 426 | May 30 – June 8, 2014 | Hillary Clinton 64% | Elizabeth Warren 15% | Joe Biden 8% | Andrew Cuomo 2%, Brian Schweitzer 1%, Martin O'Malley 0%, Undecided 10% |
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 4.82% Sample size: 414 | October 18–29, 2013 | Hillary Clinton 67% | Joe Biden 7% | Elizabeth Warren 5% | Andrew Cuomo 1%, Martin O'Malley 1%, Brian Schweitzer 1%, Mark Warner 1%, Kirsten Gillibrand 0%, Don't Know 17% |
| UoT/Texas Tribune Margin of error: ± 5.89% Sample size: 376 | May 31 – June 9, 2013 | Hillary Clinton 66% | Joe Biden 11% | Andrew Cuomo 1% | Kirsten Gillibrand 1%, Mark Warner 1%, Martin O'Malley 0%, Brian Schweitzer 0%, Don't Know 19% |

## Results

Primary date: March 1, 2016 National delegates: 75
Texas Democratic primary, March 1, 2016 :
| Candidate | Popular vote | Popular vote | Estimated delegates | Estimated delegates | Estimated delegates |
| Candidate | Count | Percentage | Pledged | Unpledged | Total |
| Hillary Clinton | 936,004 | 65.19% | 147 | 21 | 168 |
| Bernie Sanders | 476,547 | 33.19% | 75 | 0 | 75 |
| Rocky De La Fuente | 8,429 | 0.59% | | | |
| Martin O'Malley (withdrawn) | 5,364 | 0.37% | | | |
| Willie Wilson | 3,254 | 0.23% | | | |
| Keith Judd | 2,569 | 0.18% | | | |
| Calvis L. Hawes | 2,017 | 0.14% | | | |
| Star Locke | 1,711 | 0.12% | | | |
| Uncommitted | — | — | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Total | 1,435,895 | 100% | 222 | 29 | 251 |
| Source: ||||||

### Results by county

| County | Clinton | % | Sanders | % |
| Anderson | 996 | 75.6% | 299 | 22.7% |
| Andrews | 76 | 66.1% | 38 | 33.0% |
| Angelina | 1,950 | 73.7% | 622 | 23.5% |
| Aransas | 488 | 63.1% | 272 | 35.1% |
| Archer | 99 | 58.9% | 64 | 38.1% |
| Armstrong | 1 | 20.0% | 4 | 80.0% |
| Atascosa | 1,355 | 71.7% | 478 | 25.3% |
| Austin | 492 | 73.4% | 165 | 24.6% |
| Bailey | 84 | 71.2% | 29 | 24.6% |
| Bandera | 378 | 55.4% | 294 | 43.1% |
| Bastrop | 2,896 | 59.0% | 1,950 | 39.8% |
| Bland | 46 | 61.3% | 24 | 32.0% |
| Bee | 1,133 | 75.1% | 320 | 21.2% |
| Bell | 7,430 | 69.9% | 3,090 | 29.1% |
| Bexar | 76,533 | 66.8% | 36,750 | 32.1% |
| Blanco | 284 | 54.9% | 232 | 44.9% |
| Borden | 4 | 80.0% | 1 | 20.0% |
| Bosque | 353 | 62.6% | 199 | 35.3% |
| Bowie | 2,437 | 76.7% | 687 | 21.6% |
| Brazoria | 8,009 | 69.6% | 3,721 | 28.6% |
| Brazos | 3,561 | 49.1% | 3,589 | 49.5% |
| Brewster | 701 | 43.7% | 771 | 48.1% |
| Briscoe | 16 | 57.1% | 11 | 32.3% |
| Brooks | 1,603 | 74.4% | 362 | 16.8% |
| Brown | 319 | 58.5% | 212 | 38.9% |
| Burleson | 469 | 74.0% | 149 | 23.5% |
| Burnet | 878 | 59.4% | 580 | 39.3% |
| Caldwell | 1,543 | 66.1% | 742 | 31.8% |
| Calhoun | 709 | 66.6% | 305 | 28.6% |
| Callahan | 87 | 44.2% | 104 | 52.8% |
| Cameron | 20,332 | 68.2% | 8,320 | 27.9% |
| Camp | 484 | 76.6% | 134 | 21.2% |
| Carson | 50 | 62.5% | 30 | 37.5% |
| Cass | 778 | 73.1% | 265 | 24.9% |
| Castro | 127 | 73.9% | 40 | 23.3% |
| Chambers | 688 | 67.9% | 295 | 29.1% |
| Cherokee | 990 | 74.2% | 324 | 24.3% |
| Childress | 54 | 58.7% | 34 | 37.0% |
| Clay | 120 | 62.5% | 65 | 33.9% |
| Cochran | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 37.5% |
| Coke | 25 | 48.1% | 25 | 48.1% |
| Coleman | 75 | 60.0% | 49 | 39.2% |
| Collin | 23,670 | 59.1% | 16,171 | 40.4% |
| Collingsworth | 36 | 59.0% | 24 | 39.3% |
| Colorado | 474 | 74.8% | 150 | 23.7% |
| Comal | 3,112 | 60.0% | 2,027 | 39.1% |
| Comanche | 221 | 63.5% | 117 | 33.6% |
| Concho | 27 | 69.2% | 11 | 28.2% |
| Cooke | 449 | 56.4% | 334 | 42.0% |
| Coryell | 1,010 | 62.7% | 577 | 35.8% |
| Cottle | 27 | 57.5% | 18 | 38.3% |
| Crane | 62 | 66.0% | 24 | 25.5% |
| Crockett | 266 | 37.7% | 240 | 34.0% |
| Crosby | 131 | 58.2% | 91 | 40.4% |
| Culberson | 358 | 62.2% | 160 | 27.8% |
| Dallam | 24 | 61.5% | 13 | 33.3% |
| Dallas | 113,664 | 71.5% | 44,275 | 27.8% |
| Dawson | 92 | 70.2% | 34 | 26.0% |
| Deaf Smith | 200 | 67.8% | 86 | 29.2% |
| Delta | 110 | 67.9% | 51 | 31.5% |
| Denton | 16,491 | 50.7% | 15,781 | 48.6% |
| Dewitt | 293 | 70.3% | 113 | 27.1% |
| Dickens | 13 | 52.0% | 11 | 44.0% |
| Dimmit | 1,804 | 68.9% | 534 | 20.4% |
| Donley | 35 | 47.8% | 35 | 50.7% |
| Duval | 2,273 | 76.2% | 523 | 17.5% |
| Eastland | 171 | 55.7% | 122 | 39.7% |
| Ector | 1,855 | 64.9% | 942 | 33.0% |
| Edwards | 42 | 57.5% | 27 | 37.0% |
| Ellis | 3,725 | 69.5% | 1,568 | 29.2% |
| El Paso | 36,140 | 66.0% | 17,234 | 31.5% |
| Erath | 427 | 52.5% | 365 | 44.9% |
| Falls | 551 | 91.4% | 115 | 17.0% |
| Fannin | 507 | 63.0% | 279 | 34.7% |
| Fayette | 584 | 63.9% | 309 | 33.8% |
| Fisher | 226 | 53.3% | 146 | 34.4% |
| Floyd | 60 | 65.9% | 24 | 26.4% |
| Foard | 80 | 34.3% | 112 | 48.1% |
| Fort Bend | 29,259 | 74.6% | 9,774 | 24.9% |
| Franklin | 164 | 67.8% | 73 | 30.2% |
| Freestone | 380 | 76.8% | 102 | 20.6% |
| Frio | 1,864 | 67.7% | 630 | 22.9% |
| Gaines | 91 | 55.8% | 59 | 36.2% |
| Galveston | 9,466 | 68.2% | 4,241 | 30.6% |
| Garza | 35 | 56.5% | 22 | 35.5% |
| Gillespie | 493 | 60.9% | 314 | 38.8% |
| Glasscock | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 50.0% |
| Goliad | 389 | 66.4% | 151 | 25.8% |
| Gonzales | 368 | 72.3% | 129 | 25.3% |
| Gray | 111 | 53.9% | 86 | 41.8% |
| Grayson | 1,940 | 52.8% | 1,687 | 45.9% |
| Gregg | 3,423 | 78.0% | 911 | 20.8% |
| Grimes | 584 | 73.2% | 201 | 25.2% |
| Guadalupe | 3,793 | 63.9% | 2,067 | 34.8% |
| Hale | 312 | 60.4% | 176 | 34.0% |
| Hall | 63 | 64.3% | 28 | 28.6% |
| Hamilton | 115 | 56.5% | 84 | 40.2% |
| Hansford | 21 | 58.3% | 13 | 36.1% |
| Hardeman | 71 | 39.4% | 88 | 48.9% |
| Hardin | 625 | 59.5% | 398 | 27.9% |
| Harris | 157,000 | 70.5% | 63,416 | 28.5% |
| Harrison | 2,046 | 76.9% | 530 | 19.9% |
| Hartley | 19 | 55.8% | 19 | 36.5% |
| Haskell | 159 | 58.7% | 92 | 34.3% |
| Hays | 6,634 | 46.9% | 7,322 | 51.8% |
| Hemphill | 15 | 65.2% | 8 | 34.8% |
| Henderson | 1,593 | 71.6% | 598 | 26.9% |
| Hidalgo | 40,308 | 69.1% | 15,907 | 27.3% |
| Hill | 718 | 69.1% | 297 | 28.6% |
| Hockley | 183 | 58.3% | 116 | 36.9% |
| Hood | 928 | 62.6% | 527 | 35.6% |
| Houston | 464 | 80.0% | 101 | 17.4% |
| Howard | 351 | 63.5% | 192 | 34.7% |
| Hudspeth | 99 | 39.9% | 97 | 39.1% |
| Hunt | 1,329 | 60.5% | 849 | 38.6% |
| Hutchinson | 153 | 55.8% | 103 | 37.6% |
| Irion | 28 | 65.1% | 14 | 32.6% |
| Jack | 87 | 62.1% | 46 | 32.9% |
| Jackson | 266 | 70.6% | 94 | 24.9% |
| Jasper | 932 | 75.7% | 270 | 21.9% |
| Jeff Davis | 140 | 49.5% | 132 | 46.6% |
| Jefferson | 16,589 | 76.9% | 4,441 | 20.6% |
| Jim Hogg | 1,421 | 75.0% | 356 | 18.8% |
| Jim Wells | 4,697 | 71.7% | 1,436 | 21.9% |
| Johnson | 2,271 | 58.5% | 1,566 | 40.4% |
| Jones | 173 | 63.1% | 95 | 34.7% |
| Karnes | 726 | 53.0% | 479 | 34.9% |
| Kaufman | 2,234 | 69.6% | 951 | 29.6% |
| Kendall | 641 | 56.2% | 491 | 43.0% |
| Kenedy | 63 | 59.4% | 32 | 30.2% |
| Kent | 22 | 36.7% | 28 | 46.7% |
| Kerr | 1,020 | 58.4% | 709 | 40.6% |
| Kimble | 29 | 44.6% | 34 | 52.3% |
| King | 2 | 66.7% | 1 | 33.3% |
| Kinney | 211 | 60.8% | 107 | 30.8% |
| Kleberg | 1,740 | 70.7% | 630 | 25.6% |
| Knox | 68 | 71.6% | 17 | 17.9% |
| Lamar | 924 | 69.3% | 388 | 29.1% |
| Lamb | 172 | 53.3% | 87 | 26.9% |
| Lampasas | 324 | 59.8% | 207 | 38.2% |
| Lavaca | 322 | 68.5% | 137 | 29.2% |
| Lee | 367 | 65.4% | 180 | 32.1% |
| Leon | 289 | 74.3% | 89 | 22.9% |
| Liberty | 1,043 | 71.3% | 383 | 26.2% |
| Limestone | 592 | 79.1% | 144 | 19.3% |
| Lipscomb | 22 | 64.7% | 11 | 32.4% |
| Live Oak | 203 | 67.4% | 73 | 24.3% |
| Llano | 519 | 64.8% | 267 | 33.3% |
| Loving | 3 | 25.0% | 5 | 41.7% |
| Lubbock | 5,782 | 57.3% | 4,137 | 41.0% |
| Lynn | 14 | 58.3% | 10 | 41.7% |
| Madison | 227 | 75.2% | 70 | 23.2% |
| Martin | 36 | 59.0% | 17 | 27.9% |
| Mason | 89 | 62.7% | 50 | 35.2% |
| Matagorda | 1,088 | 74.2% | 344 | 23.5% |
| Maverick | 4,343 | 69.5% | 1,508 | 24.2% |
| McCulloch | 93 | 66.0% | 43 | 30.5% |
| McLennan | 5,531 | 67.0% | 2,633 | 31.9% |
| McMullen | 4 | 80.0% | 1 | 20.0% |
| Medina | 1,073 | 69.7% | 436 | 28.3% |
| Menard | 23 | 56.1% | 16 | 39.0% |
| Midland | 1,556 | 63.1% | 854 | 34.6% |
| Milam | 577 | 67.8% | 252 | 29.6% |
| Mills | 50 | 53.2% | 41 | 43.6% |
| Mitchell | 109 | 73.2% | 33 | 22.2% |
| Montague | 153 | 54.3% | 122 | 43.3% |
| Montgomery | 7,540 | 59.5% | 5,040 | 39.8% |
| Moore | 149 | 59.9% | 81 | 32.5% |
| Morris | 488 | 71.4% | 169 | 24.7% |
| Motley | 13 | 68.4% | 6 | 31.6% |
| Nacogdoches | 1,600 | 65.2% | 829 | 33.8% |
| Navarro | 957 | 72.5% | 334 | 25.3% |
| Newton | 605 | 44.2% | 529 | 40.4% |
| Nolan | 270 | 65.5% | 122 | 29.6% |
| Nueces | 15,671 | 70.5% | 6,175 | 27.8% |
| Ochiltree | 36 | 53.7% | 29 | 43.3% |
| Oldham | 11 | 68.8% | 4 | 25.0% |
| Orange | 1,852 | 68.1% | 816 | 30.0% |
| Palo Pinto | 361 | 59.5% | 230 | 37.9% |
| Panola | 559 | 80.1% | 130 | 18.6% |
| Parker | 1,808 | 54.6% | 1,475 | 44.5% |
| Parmer | 82 | 72.6% | 26 | 23.0% |
| Pecos | 816 | 55.4% | 488 | 33.2% |
| Polk | 860 | 71.1% | 326 | 26.9% |
| Potter | 1,490 | 56.5% | 1,094 | 41.5% |
| Presidio | 776 | 57.4% | 447 | 33.1% |
| Rains | 173 | 64.3% | 89 | 33.1% |
| Randall | 1,591 | 51.0% | 1,489 | 47.7% |
| Reagan | 12 | 63.2% | 7 | 36.8% |
| Real | 28 | 53.9% | 23 | 44.2% |
| Red River | 378 | 70.1% | 87 | 18.2% |
| Reeves | 1,128 | 59.6% | 563 | 29.7% |
| Refugio | 549 | 64.1% | 254 | 29.7% |
| Roberts | 3 | 60.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
| Robertson | 896 | 70.9% | 289 | 22.9% |
| Rockwall | 1,726 | 59.5% | 1,046 | 36.1% |
| Runnels | 80 | 57.6% | 55 | 39.6% |
| Rusk | 1,114 | 78.1% | 276 | 19.4% |
| Sabine | 192 | 66.4% | 82 | 28.4% |
| San Augustine | 368 | 83.1% | 62 | 14.0% |
| San Jacinto | 562 | 72.1% | 193 | 24.7% |
| San Patricio | 2,638 | 73.2% | 850 | 23.6% |
| San Saba | 58 | 67.4% | 27 | 31.4% |
| Schleicer | 58 | 64.4% | 24 | 26.7% |
| Scurry | 154 | 61.6% | 85 | 34.0% |
| Shackelford | 15 | 50.0% | 14 | 46.7% |
| Shelby | 346 | 77.8% | 90 | 20.2% |
| Sherman | 19 | 61.3% | 8 | 25.8% |
| Smith | 5,778 | 73.5% | 2,003 | 25.5% |
| Somervell | 66 | 49.3% | 67 | 50.0% |
| Starr | 6,936 | 77.8% | 1,635 | 18.3% |
| Stephens | 45 | 55.6% | 35 | 43.2% |
| Sterling | 5 | 50.0% | 4 | 40.0% |
| Stonewall | 59 | 57.8% | 36 | 35.3% |
| Sutton | 27 | 69.2% | 10 | 25.6% |
| Swisher | 141 | 60.5% | 78 | 33.5% |
| Tarrant | 68,044 | 65.2% | 35,733 | 34.2% |
| Taylor | 1,794 | 54.6% | 1,427 | 43.4% |
| Terrell | 67 | 43.5% | 64 | 41.6% |
| Terry | 141 | 59.0% | 83 | 34.7% |
| Throckmorton | 26 | 61.9% | 16 | 38.1% |
| Titus | 552 | 71.3% | 197 | 25.5% |
| Tom Green | 1,657 | 55.9% | 1,239 | 41.8% |
| Travis | 69,446 | 48.2% | 74,068 | 51.4% |
| Trinity | 333 | 71.8% | 117 | 25.2% |
| Tyler | 453 | 74.3% | 372 | 22.8% |
| Upshur | 725 | 71.7% | 269 | 26.6% |
| Upton | 91 | 55.8% | 45 | 27.6% |
| Uvalde | 1,744 | 63.4% | 762 | 27.7% |
| Val Verde | 1,776 | 65.8% | 765 | 28.3% |
| Van Zandt | 722 | 64.1% | 377 | 33.5% |
| Victoria | 2,206 | 64.5% | 1,119 | 32.7% |
| Walker | 1,292 | 61.3% | 789 | 37.4% |
| Waller | 1,221 | 67.4% | 559 | 30.9% |
| Ward | 306 | 62.2% | 147 | 29.9% |
| Washington | 782 | 73.0% | 278 | 25.9% |
| Webb | 18,559 | 71.9% | 6,177 | 23.9% |
| Wharton | 961 | 76.5% | 224 | 18.3% |
| Wheeler | 37 | 59.7% | 23 | 37.1% |
| Wichita | 1,958 | 55.5% | 1,524 | 43.2% |
| Wilbarger | 136 | 61.5% | 75 | 33.9% |
| Willacy | 2,081 | 70.0% | 660 | 22.2% |
| Williamson | 16,396 | 52.7% | 14,554 | 46.7% |
| Wilson | 1,282 | 71.5% | 481 | 26.8% |
| Winkler | 30 | 69.8% | 11 | 25.6% |
| Wise | 751 | 56.2% | 558 | 41.8% |
| Wood | 663 | 68.7% | 285 | 29.5% |
| Yoakum | 9 | 42.9% | 10 | 47.6% |
| Young | 201 | 58.8% | 132 | 38.6% |
| Zapata | 1,973 | 67.9% | 685 | 23.6% |
| Zavala | 1,557 | 75.5% | 373 | 18.1% |
| Total | 936,004 | 65.2% | 476,547 | 33.2% |

## Analysis

Clinton won the Texas primary by a landslide margin of over thirty points, thanks in large part to support from Hispanic/Latinos (whom she won by a margin of 71–29 over Bernie Sanders), African American voters (whom she won 83–15) and white women (63-35 over Sanders). Clinton won all of the major cities (Fort Worth, Dallas, El Paso, San Antonio, and Houston, and Corpus Christi) except for Austin where Sanders won only narrowly.
Sanders won few counties outside of Travis County, where the University of Texas at Austin is located. He won neighboring Hays County, home to another prominent college, Texas State University in San Marcos. Sanders also managed to very narrowly edge out Clinton in Brazos County, home to College Station and Texas A&M University, by 28 votes. In all three counties mentioned above, Sanders performed worse than Barack Obama did in the 2008 Texas Democratic primary and caucuses, despite all three containing a bloc of young voters, a demographic Sanders usually performs well in.
The rest of Sanders's victories came from 11 sparsely populated counties where Republicans have performed strongly in the past several elections. His strongest performance came from the Texas Panhandle in Armstrong County, where he won 80% of the vote, 4 votes to Clinton's 1. Two counties in particular, Glasscock and Coke, had Sanders and Clinton tie.