# Peter the Chanter

Peter the Chanter (died 1197), also known as Peter Cantor or by his Latin name Petrus Cantor, was a French Roman Catholic theologian. He received his education at Rheims, and later moved on to Paris, where, in 1183, he became Chanter (hence his name) and chief canon at Notre-Dame. Charters show Petrus Cantor as a man active in hearing cases, witnessing documents and participating in the business of the chapter of Notre Dame. Petrus was elected dean at Reims in 1196, but died in the following year in the Longpont Abbey, some time after 29 January 1197. He produced many theological works dealing with topics such as sacraments, cannon law, and the equality of men in the absence of sin. His work reflects Scholastic perspectives. Peter the Chanter was an influential voice in contemporary theology and his teachings are reflective of the evolving perspectives within the Church of the late 12th century and early 13th century.

## Law
### Trial By Ordeal

Prior to Lateran Council IV trial by ordeal was used in the adjudication of cases in many jurisdictions throughout Europe. Trial by ordeal could occur in a few ways, one of which was trial by hot iron. In this procedure the accused would be charged with carrying a glowing hot iron. After this concluded the burned hands would be bandaged and if they did not fester then the accused was declared innocent. The individual overseeing this process was often a member of the clergy. The clergy members in charge of the ordeal held a great amount of power over the results due to their ability to interpret the failure or success of the defendant. The trial by ordeal was a major topic of conversation in 12th century theology influencing theologians like Peter Chanter to argue against the trial by ordeal which was something effectively ended by the Fourth Lateran Council. Much of Peter the Chanter's teachings appear to be antithetical to the practice of the ordeal. Peter the Chanter argued that all men possess natural equality as a result of having equal reason and, because of that, they are free from the power of others in the absence of wrongdoing. Given the subjectivity with which clergy members could interpret the results of the ordeal, it provided them the opportunity to exercise power over defendants without a proof of wrongdoing.
Some scholars have argued that religious concerns were heavily involved throughout the legal processes of Medieval Europe beyond the involvement of the clergy. People were worried about the implications their judgement could have on their soul. If they judged incorrectly or mercilessly they worried that God may respond in kind with eternal damnation. This is a major topic of concern within 12th century theology influencing theologians like Peter Chanter to argue against the trial by ordeal which was something effectively ended by the Fourth Lateran Council. This intertwining of religion and secular justice was a topic Peter wrote extensively about even beyond the context of the ordeal. Peter the Chanter is a major source of clarification that the secular practices to address wrongdoing did not all address wrong done unto God and therefore only penance would affect an individual's eternal standing.