# Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations

General relativity :
$G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\kappa }T_{\mu \nu }$ :
Introduction
HistoryTimelineTests
Mathematical formulation :
Fundamental concepts
Equivalence principle
Special relativity
World line
Pseudo-Riemannian manifold :
Phenomena
Kepler problem
Gravitational lensing
Gravitational redshift
Gravitational time dilation
Gravitational waves
Frame-dragging
Geodetic effect
Event horizon
Singularity
Black hole
Spacetime
Spacetime diagrams
Minkowski spacetime
Einstein–Rosen bridge :
EquationsFormalisms
Equations
Linearized gravity
Einstein field equations
Friedmann
Geodesics
Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon
Hamilton–Jacobi–Einstein
Formalisms
ADM
BSSN
Post-Newtonian
Advanced theory
Kaluza–Klein theory
Quantum gravity :
Solutions
Schwarzschild (interior)
Reissner–Nordström
Einstein–Rosen waves
Wormhole
Gödel
Kerr
Kerr–Newman
Kerr–Newman–de Sitter
Kasner
Lemaître–Tolman
Taub–NUT
Milne
Robertson–Walker
Oppenheimer–Snyder
pp-wave
van Stockum dust
Weyl−Lewis−Papapetrou
Hartle–Thorne :
Scientists
Einstein
Lorentz
Hilbert
Poincaré
Schwarzschild
de Sitter
Reissner
Nordström
Weyl
Eddington
Friedmann
Milne
Zwicky
Lemaître
Oppenheimer
Gödel
Wheeler
Robertson
Bardeen
Walker
Kerr
Chandrasekhar
Ehlers
Penrose
Hawking
Raychaudhuri
Taylor
Hulse
van Stockum
Taub
Newman
Yau
Thorne
others :
Physics portal
 Category :
vte :
In physics, specifically general relativity, the Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations describe the motion of a massive spinning body moving in a gravitational field. Other equations with similar names and mathematical forms are the Mathisson–Papapetrou equations and Papapetrou–Dixon equations. All three sets of equations describe the same physics.
These equations are named after Myron Mathisson, William Graham Dixon, and Achilles Papapetrou, who worked on them.
Throughout, this article uses the natural units c = G = 1, and tensor index notation.

## Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations

The Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon (MPD) equations for a mass $m$ spinning body are
    ${\begin{aligned}{\frac {Dk_{\nu }}{D\tau }}+{\frac {1}{2}}S^{\lambda \mu }R_{\lambda \mu \nu \rho }V^{\rho }&=0,\\{\frac {DS^{\lambda \mu }}{D\tau }}+V^{\lambda }k^{\mu }-V^{\mu }k^{\lambda }&=0.\end{aligned}}$
Here $\tau$ is the proper time along the trajectory, $k_{\nu }$ is the body's four-momentum
    $k_{\nu }=\int _{t={\text{const}}}{T^{0}}_{\nu }{\sqrt {g}}d^{3}x,$
the vector $V^{\mu }$ is the four-velocity of some reference point $X^{\mu }$ in the body, and the skew-symmetric tensor $S^{\mu \nu }$ is the angular momentum
    $S^{\mu \nu }=\int _{t={\text{const}}}\left\{\left(x^{\mu }-X^{\mu }\right)T^{0\nu }-\left(x^{\nu }-X^{\nu }\right)T^{0\mu }\right\}{\sqrt {g}}d^{3}x$
of the body about this point. In the time-slice integrals we are assuming that the body is compact enough that we can use flat coordinates within the body where the energy-momentum tensor $T^{\mu \nu }$ is non-zero.
As they stand, there are only ten equations to determine thirteen quantities. These quantities are the six components of $S^{\lambda \mu }$, the four components of $k_{\nu }$ and the three independent components of $V^{\mu }$. The equations must therefore be supplemented by three additional constraints which serve to determine which point in the body has velocity $V^{\mu }$. Mathison and Pirani originally chose to impose the condition $V^{\mu }S_{\mu \nu }=0$ which, although involving four components, contains only three constraints because $V^{\mu }S_{\mu \nu }V^{\nu }$ is identically zero. This condition, however, does not lead to a unique solution and can give rise to the mysterious "helical motions". The Tulczyjew–Dixon condition $k_{\mu }S^{\mu \nu }=0$ does lead to a unique solution as it selects the reference point $X^{\mu }$ to be the body's center of mass in the frame in which its momentum is $(k_{0},k_{1},k_{2},k_{3})=(m,0,0,0)$.
Accepting the Tulczyjew–Dixon condition $k_{\mu }S^{\mu \nu }=0$, we can manipulate the second of the MPD equations into the form
    ${\frac {DS_{\lambda \mu }}{D\tau }}+{\frac {1}{m^{2}}}\left(S_{\lambda \rho }k_{\mu }{\frac {Dk^{\rho }}{D\tau }}+S_{\rho \mu }k_{\lambda }{\frac {Dk^{\rho }}{D\tau }}\right)=0,$
This is a form of Fermi–Walker transport of the spin tensor along the trajectory – but one preserving orthogonality to the momentum vector $k^{\mu }$ rather than to the tangent vector $V^{\mu }=dX^{\mu }/d\tau$. Dixon calls this M-transport.