# Cognitive Warfare

According to Dr. Yvonne Masakowski, cognitive warfare (CW) is any military activities which specifically focus on manipulating perceptions, beliefs, and decision-making processes to alter cognitive brain function. Cognitive warfare has been described by General Paolo Ruggiero as a form of PSYOP that utilize propaganda, disinformation, and distinguishes itself from other information related activities by its objectives - "its goal is not what individuals think, but rather, the way they think." Cognitive warfare refers to the way that human thought, reasoning, sense-making, decision-making, and behaviour may be engineered through not only the manipulation of information, but also by the A.I./ML network of algorithms which push information through the bloodstream of the internet.

## Comparison of cognitive warfare with information warfare

According to Masakowski, cognitive warfare is an extension of information warfare (IW). Operations in the information environment are traditionally conducted in five core capabilities - electronic warfare (EW), psychological operations (PSYOPs), military deception (MILDEC), operational security (OPSEC), and computer network operations (CNO). Information warfare aims at controlling the flow of information in support of traditional military objectives, mainly to produce lethal effects on the battlefield. According to Masakowski, cognitive warfare degrades the capacity to know and produce foreknowledge, transforming the understanding and interpretations of situations by individuals and in the mass consciousness, and has multiple agnostic applications including commercial, political and covert IW and CW military operations. The Chinese military refers to operations in the cognitive domain as 'cognitive domain operations (CDO)'.

## Cognitive warfare and data

Using a psychological and psychographic profile, an influence campaign can be created and adjusted in real time by A.I. ML models until desired cognitive and behaviour affects on the individual and/or population are achieved. U.S. Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency strategy calls for the use of automated biometric systems to separate insurgents and foreign fighters from the general population. In doing so, this helps counterinsurgents leverage the population and operational environment against the threat network.
Decades of peer reviewed research show that echo chambers, in the physical world and online, cause asymmetric and political polarization, extremism, confusion, dissonance, negative emotional responses (fear, anger, etc.), reactance, microaggressions, and third-person effects. And because of these psychological perseverance mechanisms like confirmations bias, this can be very problematic based on the work of Nyhan & Reifler (2010). Nyhan & Reifler found that even attempting to correct false beliefs often reinforces rather than dispels these beliefs among those who hold them most strongly. This is known as the backfire effect – "in which corrections actually increase misperceptions."

## Objectives and downstream effects

According to Masakowski, the objectives of cognitive warfare are to shape/control and enemy's cognitive thinking and decision-making; to manipulate and degrade a nation's values, emotions, national spirit, cultural traditions, historical beliefs, political will; to achieve adversarial strategic geopolitical objectives without fighting; to influence human/societal reasoning, thinking, emotions, et. al. aligned with specific objectives; and degrade a populations trust in their institutions. In doing so, Masakowski claims that this allows for the weakening/distruption of military, political & societal cohesion; and undermining/threatening of democracy. Masakowski alleges that cognitive warfare has also been used by authoritarian societies to restructure society and groom populations to accept "continuous surveillance" and that this allows these authoritarian societies to "remove individuals/outliers who resist and insist on Freedom of Speech, Independent Thinking, etc."