# Cayley table

Named after the 19th-century British mathematician Arthur Cayley, a Cayley table describes the structure of a finite group by arranging all the possible products of all the group's elements in a square table reminiscent of an addition or multiplication table. Many properties of a group – such as whether or not it is abelian, which elements are inverses of which elements, and the size and contents of the group's center – can be discovered from its Cayley table.
A simple example of a Cayley table is the one for the group {1, −1} under ordinary multiplication:
| × | 1 | −1 |
| 1 | 1 | −1 |
| −1 | −1 | 1 |

## History

Cayley tables were first presented in Cayley's 1854 paper, "On The Theory of Groups, as depending on the symbolic equation θ$^n$ = 1". In that paper they were referred to simply as tables, and were merely illustrative – they came to be known as Cayley tables later on, in honour of their creator.

## Structure and layout

Because many Cayley tables describe groups that are not abelian, the product ab with respect to the group's binary operation is not guaranteed to be equal to the product ba for all a and b in the group. In order to avoid confusion, the convention is that the factor that labels the row (termed nearer factor by Cayley) comes first, and that the factor that labels the column (or further factor) is second. For example, the intersection of row a and column b is ab and not ba, as in the following example:
| * | a | b | c |
| a | a$^2$ | ab | ac |
| b | ba | b$^2$ | bc |
| c | ca | cb | c$^2$ |

## Properties and uses
### Commutativity

The Cayley table tells us whether a group is abelian. Because the group operation of an abelian group is commutative, a group is abelian if and only if its Cayley table's values are symmetric along its diagonal axis. The group {1, −1} above and the cyclic group of order 3 under ordinary multiplication are both examples of abelian groups, and inspection of the symmetry of their Cayley tables verifies this. In contrast, the smallest non-abelian group, the dihedral group of order 6, does not have a symmetric Cayley table.

### Associativity

Because associativity is taken as an axiom when dealing with groups, it is often taken for granted when dealing with Cayley tables. However, Cayley tables can also be used to characterize the operation of a quasigroup, which does not assume associativity as an axiom (indeed, Cayley tables can be used to characterize the operation of any finite magma). Unfortunately, it is not generally possible to determine whether or not an operation is associative simply by glancing at its Cayley table, as it is with commutativity. This is because associativity depends on a 3 term equation, $(ab)c=a(bc)$, while the Cayley table shows 2-term products. However, Light's associativity test can determine associativity with less effort than brute force.

### Permutations

Because the cancellation property holds for groups (and indeed even quasigroups), no row or column of a Cayley table may contain the same element twice. Thus each row and column of the table is a permutation of all the elements in the group. This greatly restricts which Cayley tables could conceivably define a valid group operation.
To see why a row or column cannot contain the same element more than once, let a, x, and y all be elements of a group, with x and y distinct. Then in the row representing the element a, the column corresponding to x contains the product ax, and similarly the column corresponding to y contains the product ay. If these two products were equal – that is to say, row a contained the same element twice, our hypothesis – then ax would equal ay. But because the cancellation law holds, we can conclude that if ax = ay, then x = y, a contradiction. Therefore, our hypothesis is incorrect, and a row cannot contain the same element twice. Exactly the same argument suffices to prove the column case, and so we conclude that each row and column contains no element more than once. Because the group is finite, the pigeonhole principle guarantees that each element of the group will be represented in each row and in each column exactly once. Thus, the Cayley table of a group is an example of a latin square. An alternative and more succinct proof follows from the cancellation property. This property implies that for each x in the group, the one variable function of y f(x,y)= xy must be a one-to-one map. The result follows from the fact that one-to-one maps on finite sets are permutations.

## Permutation matrix generation

The standard form of a Cayley table has the order of the elements in the rows the same as the order in the columns. Another form is to arrange the elements of the columns so that the nth column corresponds to the inverse of the element in the nth row. In our example of D$_3$, we need only switch the last two columns, since f and d are the only elements that are not their own inverses, but instead inverses of each other.
| | e | a | b | c | f=d$^{−1}$ | d=f$^{−1}$ |
| e | e | a | b | c | f | d |
| a | a | e | d | f | c | b |
| b | b | f | e | d | a | c |
| c | c | d | f | e | b | a |
| d | d | c | a | b | e | f |
| f | f | b | c | a | d | e |
This particular example lets us create six permutation matrices (all elements 1 or 0, exactly one 1 in each row and column). The 6x6 matrix representing an element will have a 1 in every position that has the letter of the element in the Cayley table and a zero in every other position, the Kronecker delta function for that symbol. (Note that e is in every position down the main diagonal, which gives us the identity matrix for 6x6 matrices in this case, as we would expect.) Here is the matrix that represents our element a, for example.
| | e | a | b | c | f | d |
| e | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| a | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| d | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| f | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
This shows us directly that any group of order n is a subgroup of the permutation group S$_n$, order n!.

## Generalizations

The above properties depend on some axioms valid for groups. It is natural to consider Cayley tables for other algebraic structures, such as for semigroups, quasigroups, and magmas, but some of the properties above do not hold.