# Nangnang Kingdom

Part of a series on the :
History of Korea :
Prehistoric period Palaeolithic 700,000 BC-8000 BC Neolithic 8000 BC–1500 BC* Jeulmun Bronze Age 1500 BC–300 BC* Mumun* Liaoning dagger :
Ancient period Gojoseon 2333 BC–108 BC* Dangun* Gija* Wiman Jin 4th–2nd century BC Yemaek :
Proto–Three Kingdoms period
Takri
Dongye
Buyeo
Eastern
Galsa
Okjeo
Samhan
Ma
Byeon
Jin
Goguryeo
Tamna
Nakrang
Four Commanderies of Han :
Three Kingdoms period Goguryeo 37 BC–668 AD Baekje 18 BC–660 AD Silla 57 BC–935 AD Gaya confederacy 42–562 Tamna (Tributary of Baekje) 498–660 Usan 512–930 :
Northern and Southern period United Silla (Unified Silla) 668–892 Balhae 698–926 Little Goguryeo 699–820 Tamna (Tributary of Silla) 662–925 :
Later Three Kingdoms period Later Baekje 892–936 Taebong (Later Goguryeo) 901–918 Unified Silla (Later Silla) 892–935 Later Sabeol 919–927 Dongdan Kingdom 926–936 Later Balhae 927–935 Jeongan 938–986 :
Dynastic period Goryeo 918–1392 Tamna (Vassal of Goryeo) 938–1105 Heungyo 1029–1030 Joseon 1392–1897 Korean Empire 1897–1910 :
Colonial period Japanese occupation 1910–1945 Provisional Government 1919–1948 :
Modern period Military governments 1945–1948 North-South division 1945–present* North 1948–present* South 1948–present :
By topic
Architecture
Art
Cuisine
Currency
Education
Geography
Historiography
Language
Military (List · Goguryeo)
Monarchs (Family tree)
Names (Era names)
Naval
Newspapers
Politics (Joseon · North · South)
Religion
Buddhism
Christianity
Islam
Science and technology
Women
World Heritage Sites (North · South) :
Timeline :
Korea portal :
vte :
Nakrang Kingdom (Korean: 낙랑국; Hanja: 樂浪國) was a kingdom located in the northwestern part of the Korean Peninsula according to Samguk Sagi. The kingdom's independence, however, is debated. According to the ancient Korean record of Samguk Sagi, the King of Nakrang named Choi Ri met the Prince Hodong of Goguryeo and let him marry his daughter, the Princess of Nakrang. When Prince Hodong asked the princess to break drums and horns in the Nakrang's armory to prevent the kingdom's guards from alerting the attack by Goguryeo, the princess followed Hodong's instructions, leading to Nakrang being conquered by Goguryeo.

## Dispute regarding independence

The view regarding Nakrang's independence is disputed. While Chinese and Japanese scholars claim that the name Nakrang actually refers to the Lelang Commandery of China's Han dynasty and Choi Ri was Lelang's governor rather than a King, Korean scholars often view Nakrang as an independent kingdom.

### Korean perspective

Korean scholars tend to view Nakrang as an independent kingdom given that the ancient Korean record Samguk Sagi referred to Nakrang as a kingdom and Choi Ri as Nakrang's King (樂浪王). They also point out the lack of Chinese record mentioning Choi Ri as the official of Lelang. It is also noted that Goguryeo must had attacked Lelang Commandry during the time period mentioned in Samguk Sagi if the name Nakrang indeed referred to Lelang. However, there is no record of such war between Goguryeo and Lelang at the mentioned time, suggesting that Nakrang was possibly a different state than Lelang.
Because the record of Samguk Sagi also suggested that Choi Ri and Hodong met near modern-day Hamhung, some South Korean scholars speculate Nakrang to be a kingdom centered around Hamhung, possibly related to the several states that briefly evolved and lived after the abolishment of Lelang Commandery, before being absorbed by Goguryeo.
North Korean academia fully assert that Nakrang was an independent country that existed in modern-day Pyongyang and composed Mahan confederacy, arguing Lelang Commandery to be actually located near Liao River of Liaodong Peninsula. The North Korean academia also speculate the Chinese-style ruins and relics found in Pyongyang to be either the war bounties, introduced through trade, or even forged. They also emphasize that the Korean characteristics found in the ruins and relics should not be negated.

### Chinese and Japanese perspective

The Chinese and Japanese scholars state that the Nakrang Kingdom was just another name used to refer to the Lelang Commandery of the Chinese Han dynasty. This perspective claims that it was referred to with the name of a kingdom because the residents were autonomous but were ultimately controlled by the Chinese commandery. The King of Nakrang was also interpreted to be the same title as the governor of the commandery.
Kenji Takahisa (Professor of Korean history at Senshu University) mentions “In that theory, there were Nakrang Kingdom which founded by old Korean ethnic group in Pyongyang, not Lelang Commandery of Han. However, it is difficult to prove this theory because there are many tombs influenced by Han culture found in Pyongyang, while there were not related archaeological and historical resources related to Lelang Commandery in Liaoning area.”
Shouei Mishina criticized the claim that Nakrang Kingdom was different from the Lelang Commandery and said that it ignored the situation of Lelang Commandery of the Eastern Han dynasty.