# Soft target

Part of a series on :
Terrorism :
Definitions
History
Incidents :
By ideology
Anarchist
Communist
Left-wing/Far-left
Narcotics-driven
Nationalist
Right-wing/Far-right
Religious
Buddhist
Christian (Mormon)
Hindu
Islamic (Salafi-Wahhabi)
Jewish
Sikh
Special-interest / Single-issue
Suffragette
Anti-abortion
Green/Ecological
Misogynist
Related topics
Violent extremism
Ethnic violence
Militia movement
Resistance movement :
Structure
Financing
Fronting
Radicalization (online)
Training camp
Death squad
Clandestine cell system
Leaderless resistance
Lone wolf
Domestic :
MethodsTactics
Agro-terrorism
Aircraft hijacking (list)
Beheading
Bombing
Animal-borne
Car (list)
Improvised
Letter
Threat
Proxy
Bioterrorism
Cyberterrorism
Dry run
Environmental
Hostage-taking
Individual terror
Insurgency
Kidnapping
Lone wolf
Nuclear
Paper
Piracy
Propaganda of the deed
Shooting
School
Spree
Stabbing
Suicide attack (list)
Rockets and mortars
Vehicle-ramming :
Terrorist groups
Designated terrorist groups
Charities accused of ties to terrorism :
Adherents
Violent non-state actors
State terrorism
Kazakhstan
Soviet Union
United States
Uzbekistan
State-sponsored terrorism
Iran
Israel
Kuwait
Libya
Pakistan
Qatar
Russia (Soviet Union)
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United States
Venezuela :
Response to terrorism
Counter-terrorism
International conventions
Anti-terrorism legislation
Terrorism insurance :
vte :
A "soft target" is a person, thing, or location that is easily accessible to the general public and relatively unprotected, making it vulnerable to military strikes, terrorism, car bombs, or crimes such as vehicle-ramming attacks or mass shootings. By contrast, a "hard target" is heavily defended or not accessible to the general public.

## Definition

The terms "soft target" and "hard target" are flexible in nature and the distinction between the two is not always clear. However, typical "soft targets" are civilian sites where unarmed people congregate in large numbers; examples include national monuments, hospitals, schools, sporting arenas, hotels, cultural centers, movie theaters, cafés and restaurants, places of worship, nightclubs, shopping centers, transportation sites (such as railway stations, buses, rail systems, and ferries), and farmers' cooperatives. Soft targets are contrasted with hard targets, which are well-protected. Examples of hard targets include airports, government buildings, military installations, diplomatic missions, and power stations. Hard targets have access controls that prevent public access.

## History

Terrorist groups more often choose to strike soft targets. Of terrorist attacks worldwide from 1968 to 2005, 72% (8,111) struck soft targets and 27% (4,248) struck hard targets. The intent of attacks on soft targets is to instill fear as well as inflict casualties. Clark Kent Ervin notes that attacks on soft targets inflict psychological damage. In 2011, while preparations were being made for the 2012 Summer Olympics, the deputy commissioner of London's Metropolitan Police Service noted that if the primary targets were secure, terrorists might substitute targets that are nearby but not as well protected.
Military and paramilitary groups may adopt a strategy of attacking soft targets in order to avoid direct confrontation with a stronger opponent. For example, U.S. military general John Galvin noted in 1987 that Contra rebels switched to civilian targets rather than continuing the direct fighting against the Sandinista National Liberation Front.