Skill: zhihongyee/self-improvement-2 (version 0.1.0)

--- name: self-improvement description: "Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails, (5) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (6) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task. Also review learnings before major tasks. For CI-only/headless learning capture, use self-improvement-ci." --- # Self-Improvement Skill ## Install ```bash npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/skills/self-improvement ``` For CI-only execution, use: ```bash npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/skills/self-improvement-ci ``` Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory. ## Quick Reference | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Command/operation fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` | | User corrects you | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `correction` | | User wants missing feature | Log to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md` | | API/external tool fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` with integration details | | Knowledge was outdated | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `knowledge_gap` | | Found better approach | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `best_practice` | | Simplify/Harden recurring patterns | Log/update `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with `Source: simplify-and-harden` and a stable `Pattern-Key` | | Similar to existing entry | Link with `**See Also**`, consider priority bump | | Broadly applicable learning | Promote to `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and/or `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | | Workflow improvements | Promote to `AGENTS.md` (openclaw workspace) | | Tool gotchas | Promote to `TOOLS.md` (openclaw workspace) | | Behavioral patterns | Promote to `SOUL.md` (openclaw workspace) | ## Setup Create `.learnings/` directory in project root if it doesn't exist: ```bash mkdir -p .learnings ``` Copy templates from `assets/` or create files with headers. ## Logging Format ### Learning Entry Append to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md`: ```markdown ## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: low | medium | high | critical **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Summary One-line description of what was learned ### Details Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct ### Suggested Action Specific fix or improvement to make ### Metadata - Source: conversation | error | user_feedback - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - Tags: tag1, tag2 - See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry) - Pattern-Key: simplify.dead_code | harden.input_validation (optional, for recurring-pattern tracking) - Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional) - First-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional) - Last-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional) --- ``` ### Error Entry Append to `.learnings/ERRORS.md`: ```markdown ## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: high **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Summary Brief description of what failed ### Error ``` Actual error message or output ``` ### Context - Command/operation attempted - Input or parameters used - Environment details if relevant ### Suggested Fix If identifiable, what might resolve this ### Metadata - Reproducible: yes | no | unknown - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring) --- ``` ### Feature Request Entry Append to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md`: ```markdown ## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: medium **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Requested Capability What the user wanted to do ### User Context Why they needed it, what problem they're solving ### Complexity Estimate simple | medium | complex ### Suggested Implementation How this could be built, what it might extend ### Metadata - Frequency: first_time | recurring - Related Features: existing_feature_name --- ``` ## ID Generation Format: `TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX` - TYPE: `LRN` (learning), `ERR` (error), `FEAT` (feature) - YYYYMMDD: Current date - XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., `001`, `A7B`) Examples: `LRN-20250115-001`, `ERR-20250115-A3F`, `FEAT-20250115-002` ## Resolving Entries When an issue is fixed, update the entry: 1. Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: resolved` 2. Add resolution block after Metadata: ```markdown ### Resolution - **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z - **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42 - **Notes**: Brief description of what was done ``` Other status values: - `in_progress` - Actively being worked on - `wont_fix` - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes) - `promoted` - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md ## Promoting to Project Memory When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory. ### When to Promote - Learning applies across multiple files/features - Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know - Prevents recurring mistakes - Documents project-specific conventions ### Promotion Targets | Target | What Belongs There | |--------|-------------------| | `CLAUDE.md` | Project facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions | | `AGENTS.md` | Agent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules | | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | Project context and conventions for GitHub Copilot | | `SOUL.md` | Behavioral guidelines, communication style, principles (openclaw) | | `TOOLS.md` | Tool capabilities, usage patterns, integration gotchas (openclaw) | ### How to Promote 1. **Distill** the learning into a concise rule or fact 2. **Add** to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed) 3. **Update** original entry: - Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: promoted` - Add `**Promoted**: CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, or `.github/copilot-instructions.md` ### Promotion Examples **Learning** (verbose): > Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted `npm install` but failed. > Lock file is `pnpm-lock.yaml`. Must use `pnpm install`. **In CLAUDE.md** (concise): ```markdown ## Build & Dependencies - Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install` ``` **Learning** (verbose): > When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. > Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime. **In AGENTS.md** (actionable): ```markdown ## After API Changes 1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api` 2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit` ``` ## Recurring Pattern Detection If logging something similar to an existing entry: 1. **Search first**: `grep -r "keyword" .learnings/` 2. **Link entries**: Add `**See Also**: ERR-20250110-001` in Metadata 3. **Bump priority** if issue keeps recurring 4. **Consider systemic fix**: Recurring issues often indicate: - Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md) - Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md) - Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket) ## Simplify & Harden Feed Use this workflow to ingest recurring patterns from the `simplify-and-harden` skill and turn them into durable prompt guidance. ### Ingestion Workflow 1. Read `simplify_and_harden.learning_loop.candidates` from the task summary. 2. For each candidate, use `pattern_key` as the stable dedupe key. 3. Search `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` for an existing entry with that key: - `grep -n "Pattern-Key: <pattern_key>" .learnings/LEARNINGS.md` 4. If found: - Increment `Recurrence-Count` - Update `Last-Seen` - Add `See Also` links to related entries/tasks 5. If not found: - Create a new `LRN-...` entry - Set `Source: simplify-and-harden` - Set `Pattern-Key`, `Recurrence-Count: 1`, and `First-Seen`/`Last-Seen` ### Promotion Rule (System Prompt Feedback) Promote recurring patterns into agent context/system prompt files when all are true: - `Recurrence-Count >= 3` - Seen across at least 2 distinct tasks - Occurred within a 30-day window Promotion targets: - `CLAUDE.md` - `AGENTS.md` - `.github/copilot-instructions.md` - `SOUL.md` / `TOOLS.md` for openclaw workspace-level guidance when applicable Write promoted rules as short prevention rules (what to do before/while coding), not long incident write-ups. ## Periodic Review Review `.learnings/` at natural breakpoints: ### When to Review - Before starting a new major task - After completing a feature - When working in an area with past learnings - Weekly during active development ### Quick Status Check ```bash # Count pending items grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l # List pending high-priority items grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \[" # Find learnings for a specific area grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md ``` ### Review Actions - Resolve fixed items - Promote applicable learnings - Link related entries - Escalate recurring issues ## Detection Triggers Automatically log when you notice: **Corrections** (→ learning with `correction` category): - "No, that's not right..." - "Actually, it should be..." - "You're wrong about..." - "That's outdated..." **Feature Requests** (→ feature request): - "Can you also..." - "I wish you could..." - "Is there a way to..." - "Why can't you..." **Knowledge Gaps** (→ learning with `knowledge_gap` category): - User provides information you didn't know - Documentation you referenced is outdated - API behavior differs from your understanding **Errors** (→ error entry): - Command returns non-zero exit code - Exception or stack trace - Unexpected output or behavior - Timeout or connection failure ## Priority Guidelines | Priority | When to Use | |----------|-------------| | `critical` | Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue | | `high` | Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue | | `medium` | Moderate impact, workaround exists | | `low` | Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have | ## Area Tags Use to filter learnings by codebase region: | Area | Scope | |------|-------| | `frontend` | UI, components, client-side code | | `backend` | API, services, server-side code | | `infra` | CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud | | `tests` | Test files, testing utilities, coverage | | `docs` | Documentation, comments, READMEs | | `config` | Configuration files, environment, settings | ## Best Practices 1. **Log immediately** - context is freshest right after the issue 2. **Be specific** - future agents need to understand quickly 3. **Include reproduction steps** - especially for errors 4. **Link related files** - makes fixes easier 5. **Suggest concrete fixes** - not just "investigate" 6. **Use consistent categories** - enables filtering 7. **Promote aggressively** - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md 8. **Review regularly** - stale learnings lose value ## Gitignore Options **Keep learnings local** (per-developer): ```gitignore .learnings/ ``` **Track learnings in repo** (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge. **Hybrid** (track templates, ignore entries): ```gitignore .learnings/*.md !.learnings/.gitkeep ``` ## Hook Integration Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is **opt-in** - you must explicitly configure hooks. ### Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex) Create `.claude/settings.json` in your project: ```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }] } } ``` This injects a learning evaluation reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead). ### Full Setup (With Error Detection) ```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }], "PostToolUse": [{ "matcher": "Bash", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh" }] }] } } ``` ### Available Hook Scripts | Script | Hook Type | Purpose | |--------|-----------|---------| | `scripts/activator.sh` | UserPromptSubmit | Reminds to evaluate learnings after tasks | | `scripts/error-detector.sh` | PostToolUse (Bash) | Triggers on command errors | See `references/hooks-setup.md` for detailed configuration and troubleshooting. ## Automatic Skill Extraction When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper. ### Skill Extraction Criteria A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply: | Criterion | Description | |-----------|-------------| | **Recurring** | Has `See Also` links to 2+ similar issues | | **Verified** | Status is `resolved` with working fix | | **Non-obvious** | Required actual debugging/investigation to discover | | **Broadly applicable** | Not project-specific; useful across codebases | | **User-flagged** | User says "save this as a skill" or similar | ### Extraction Workflow 1. **Identify candidate**: Learning meets extraction criteria 2. **Run helper** (or create manually): ```bash ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name ``` 3. **Customize SKILL.md**: Fill in template with learning content 4. **Update learning**: Set status to `promoted_to_skill`, add `Skill-Path` 5. **Verify**: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained ### Manual Extraction If you prefer manual creation: 1. Create `skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` 2. Use template from `assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md` 3. Follow [Agent Skills spec](https://agentskills.io/specification): - YAML frontmatter with `name` and `description` - Name must match folder name - No README.md inside skill folder ### Extraction Detection Triggers Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill: **In conversation:** - "Save this as a skill" - "I keep running into this" - "This would be useful for other projects" - "Remember this pattern" **In learning entries:** - Multiple `See Also` links (recurring issue) - High priority + resolved status - Category: `best_practice` with broad applicability - User feedback praising the solution ### Skill Quality Gates Before extraction, verify: - [ ] Solution is tested and working - [ ] Description is clear without original context - [ ] Code examples are self-contained - [ ] No project-specific hardcoded values - [ ] Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens) ## Multi-Agent Support This skill works across different AI coding agents with agent-specific activation. ### Claude Code **Activation**: Hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse) **Setup**: `.claude/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts ### Codex CLI **Activation**: Hooks (same pattern as Claude Code) **Setup**: `.codex/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts ### GitHub Copilot **Activation**: Manual (no hook support) **Setup**: Add to `.github/copilot-instructions.md`: ```markdown ## Self-Improvement After solving non-obvious issues, consider logging to `.learnings/`: 1. Use format from self-improvement skill 2. Link related entries with See Also 3. Promote high-value learnings to skills Ask in chat: "Should I log this as a learning?" ``` **Detection**: Manual review at session end ### OpenClaw (Optional) OpenClaw-specific setup, promotion targets, and hybrid usage details are kept in `references/openclaw-integration.md` so this main skill stays focused on the core self-improvement workflow for coding agents. ### Agent-Agnostic Guidance Regardless of agent, apply self-improvement when you: 1. **Discover something non-obvious** - solution wasn't immediate 2. **Correct yourself** - initial approach was wrong 3. **Learn project conventions** - discovered undocumented patterns 4. **Hit unexpected errors** - especially if diagnosis was difficult 5. **Find better approaches** - improved on your original solution ### Copilot Chat Integration For Copilot users, add this to your prompts when relevant: > After completing this task, evaluate if any learnings should be logged to `.learnings/` using the self-improvement skill format. Or use quick prompts: - "Log this to learnings" - "Create a skill from this solution" - "Check .learnings/ for related issues"


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: suspicious | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: suspicious (CRITICAL)