Skill: encryptshawn/approved-self-improver (version 1.0.0)

--- name: approved-self-improvement description: "Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement with user-approved skill updates. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails, (5) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (6) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task, (7) User asks 'what skill improvements do you recommend?' or 'show me pending skill updates' or similar, (8) A skill failure matches an existing improvement proposal. Also review learnings and pending improvement proposals before major tasks. IMPORTANT: Never modify any skill without explicit user approval unless the user has authorized auto-update for that specific skill." metadata: --- # Approved-Self-Improvement Skill Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory. **All skill modifications require explicit user approval** — improvement proposals are documented and presented to the user before any changes are applied. See [Approval-Gated Skill Improvement](#approval-gated-skill-improvement) for the full workflow. ## First-Use Initialisation Before logging anything, ensure the `.learnings/` directory and files exist in the project or workspace root. If any are missing, create them: ```bash mkdir -p .learnings/pending-improvements [ -f .learnings/LEARNINGS.md ] || printf "# Learnings\n\nCorrections, insights, and knowledge gaps captured during development.\n\n**Categories**: correction | insight | knowledge_gap | best_practice\n\n---\n" > .learnings/LEARNINGS.md [ -f .learnings/ERRORS.md ] || printf "# Errors\n\nCommand failures and integration errors.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/ERRORS.md [ -f .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ] || printf "# Feature Requests\n\nCapabilities requested by the user.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md [ -f .learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md ] || printf "# Auto-Update Authorizations\n\nSkills authorized for automatic self-improvement without user approval.\nBy default, NO skills are authorized. Users must explicitly grant per-skill.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md ``` Never overwrite existing files. This is a no-op if `.learnings/` is already initialised. Do not log secrets, tokens, private keys, environment variables, or full source/config files unless the user explicitly asks for that level of detail. Prefer short summaries or redacted excerpts over raw command output or full transcripts. If you want automatic reminders or setup assistance, use the opt-in hook workflow described in [Hook Integration](#hook-integration). ## Quick Reference | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Command/operation fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` | | User corrects you | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `correction` | | User wants missing feature | Log to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md` | | API/external tool fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` with integration details | | Knowledge was outdated | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `knowledge_gap` | | Found better approach | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `best_practice` | | Skill failure identified with fix | Create proposal in `.learnings/pending-improvements/` — **do NOT modify the skill** | | Recurring failure matches existing proposal | Log recurrence in proposal, notify user and recommend applying it | | User asks for recommended improvements | List all pending proposals from `.learnings/pending-improvements/` | | User approves an improvement proposal | Apply changes, update proposal status to `applied` | | User authorizes auto-update for a skill | Record in `.learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md` | | Skill failure + skill is auto-update authorized | Apply fix directly, log what changed | | Simplify/Harden recurring patterns | Log/update `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with `Source: simplify-and-harden` and a stable `Pattern-Key` | | Similar to existing entry | Link with `**See Also**`, consider priority bump | | Broadly applicable learning | Promote to `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and/or `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | | Workflow improvements | Promote to `AGENTS.md` (OpenClaw workspace) | | Tool gotchas | Promote to `TOOLS.md` (OpenClaw workspace) | | Behavioral patterns | Promote to `SOUL.md` (OpenClaw workspace) | ## OpenClaw Setup (Recommended) OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading. ### Installation **Via ClawdHub (recommended):** ```bash clawdhub install self-improving-agent ``` **Manual:** ```bash git clone https://github.com/peterskoett/self-improving-agent.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-agent ``` Remade for openclaw from original repo : https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills - https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/tree/main/skills/self-improvement ### Workspace Structure OpenClaw injects these files into every session: ``` ~/.openclaw/workspace/ ├── AGENTS.md # Multi-agent workflows, delegation patterns ├── SOUL.md # Behavioral guidelines, personality, principles ├── TOOLS.md # Tool capabilities, integration gotchas ├── MEMORY.md # Long-term memory (main session only) ├── memory/ # Daily memory files │ └── YYYY-MM-DD.md └── .learnings/ # This skill's log files ├── LEARNINGS.md ├── ERRORS.md ├── FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ├── AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md # Per-skill auto-update permissions └── pending-improvements/ # Improvement proposals awaiting approval └── IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX-skill-name.md ``` ### Create Learning Files ```bash mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings/pending-improvements ``` Then create the log files (or copy from `assets/`): - `LEARNINGS.md` — corrections, knowledge gaps, best practices - `ERRORS.md` — command failures, exceptions - `FEATURE_REQUESTS.md` — user-requested capabilities - `AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md` — per-skill auto-update permissions (copy from `assets/`) ### Promotion Targets When learnings prove broadly applicable, promote them to workspace files: | Learning Type | Promote To | Example | |---------------|------------|---------| | Behavioral patterns | `SOUL.md` | "Be concise, avoid disclaimers" | | Workflow improvements | `AGENTS.md` | "Spawn sub-agents for long tasks" | | Tool gotchas | `TOOLS.md` | "Git push needs auth configured first" | ### Inter-Session Communication OpenClaw provides tools to share learnings across sessions: - **sessions_list** — View active/recent sessions - **sessions_history** — Read another session's transcript - **sessions_send** — Send a learning to another session - **sessions_spawn** — Spawn a sub-agent for background work Use these only in trusted environments and only when the user explicitly wants cross-session sharing. Prefer sending a short sanitized summary and relevant file paths, not raw transcripts, secrets, or full command output. ### Optional: Enable Hook For automatic reminders at session start: ```bash # Copy hook to OpenClaw hooks directory cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improvement # Enable it openclaw hooks enable self-improvement ``` See `references/openclaw-integration.md` for complete details. --- ## Generic Setup (Other Agents) For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create `.learnings/` in the project or workspace root: ```bash mkdir -p .learnings ``` Create the files inline using the headers shown above. Avoid reading templates from the current repo or workspace unless you explicitly trust that path. ### Add reference to agent files AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md to remind yourself to log learnings. (this is an alternative to hook-based reminders) #### Self-Improvement Workflow When errors or corrections occur: 1. Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md`, `LEARNINGS.md`, or `FEATURE_REQUESTS.md` 2. Review and promote broadly applicable learnings to: - `CLAUDE.md` - project facts and conventions - `AGENTS.md` - workflows and automation - `.github/copilot-instructions.md` - Copilot context ## Logging Format ### Learning Entry Append to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md`: ```markdown ## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: low | medium | high | critical **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Summary One-line description of what was learned ### Details Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct ### Suggested Action Specific fix or improvement to make ### Metadata - Source: conversation | error | user_feedback - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - Tags: tag1, tag2 - See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry) - Pattern-Key: simplify.dead_code | harden.input_validation (optional, for recurring-pattern tracking) - Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional) - First-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional) - Last-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional) --- ``` ### Error Entry Append to `.learnings/ERRORS.md`: ```markdown ## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: high **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Summary Brief description of what failed ### Error ``` Actual error message or output ``` ### Context - Command/operation attempted - Input or parameters used - Environment details if relevant - Summary or redacted excerpt of relevant output (avoid full transcripts and secret-bearing data by default) ### Suggested Fix If identifiable, what might resolve this ### Metadata - Reproducible: yes | no | unknown - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring) --- ``` ### Feature Request Entry Append to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md`: ```markdown ## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name **Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: medium **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config ### Requested Capability What the user wanted to do ### User Context Why they needed it, what problem they're solving ### Complexity Estimate simple | medium | complex ### Suggested Implementation How this could be built, what it might extend ### Metadata - Frequency: first_time | recurring - Related Features: existing_feature_name --- ``` ## ID Generation Format: `TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX` - TYPE: `LRN` (learning), `ERR` (error), `FEAT` (feature) - YYYYMMDD: Current date - XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., `001`, `A7B`) Examples: `LRN-20250115-001`, `ERR-20250115-A3F`, `FEAT-20250115-002` ## Resolving Entries When an issue is fixed, update the entry: 1. Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: resolved` 2. Add resolution block after Metadata: ```markdown ### Resolution - **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z - **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42 - **Notes**: Brief description of what was done ``` Other status values: - `in_progress` - Actively being worked on - `wont_fix` - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes) - `promoted` - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md ## Promoting to Project Memory When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory. ### When to Promote - Learning applies across multiple files/features - Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know - Prevents recurring mistakes - Documents project-specific conventions ### Promotion Targets | Target | What Belongs There | |--------|-------------------| | `CLAUDE.md` | Project facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions | | `AGENTS.md` | Agent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules | | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | Project context and conventions for GitHub Copilot | | `SOUL.md` | Behavioral guidelines, communication style, principles (OpenClaw workspace) | | `TOOLS.md` | Tool capabilities, usage patterns, integration gotchas (OpenClaw workspace) | ### How to Promote 1. **Distill** the learning into a concise rule or fact 2. **Add** to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed) 3. **Update** original entry: - Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: promoted` - Add `**Promoted**: CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, or `.github/copilot-instructions.md` ### Promotion Examples **Learning** (verbose): > Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted `npm install` but failed. > Lock file is `pnpm-lock.yaml`. Must use `pnpm install`. **In CLAUDE.md** (concise): ```markdown ## Build & Dependencies - Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install` ``` **Learning** (verbose): > When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. > Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime. **In AGENTS.md** (actionable): ```markdown ## After API Changes 1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api` 2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit` ``` ## Recurring Pattern Detection If logging something similar to an existing entry: 1. **Search first**: `grep -r "keyword" .learnings/` 2. **Link entries**: Add `**See Also**: ERR-20250110-001` in Metadata 3. **Bump priority** if issue keeps recurring 4. **Consider systemic fix**: Recurring issues often indicate: - Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md) - Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md) - Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket) ## Simplify & Harden Feed Use this workflow to ingest recurring patterns from the `simplify-and-harden` skill and turn them into durable prompt guidance. ### Ingestion Workflow 1. Read `simplify_and_harden.learning_loop.candidates` from the task summary. 2. For each candidate, use `pattern_key` as the stable dedupe key. 3. Search `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` for an existing entry with that key: - `grep -n "Pattern-Key: <pattern_key>" .learnings/LEARNINGS.md` 4. If found: - Increment `Recurrence-Count` - Update `Last-Seen` - Add `See Also` links to related entries/tasks 5. If not found: - Create a new `LRN-...` entry - Set `Source: simplify-and-harden` - Set `Pattern-Key`, `Recurrence-Count: 1`, and `First-Seen`/`Last-Seen` ### Promotion Rule (System Prompt Feedback) Promote recurring patterns into agent context/system prompt files when all are true: - `Recurrence-Count >= 3` - Seen across at least 2 distinct tasks - Occurred within a 30-day window Promotion targets: - `CLAUDE.md` - `AGENTS.md` - `.github/copilot-instructions.md` - `SOUL.md` / `TOOLS.md` for OpenClaw workspace-level guidance when applicable Write promoted rules as short prevention rules (what to do before/while coding), not long incident write-ups. ## Periodic Review Review `.learnings/` at natural breakpoints: ### When to Review - Before starting a new major task - After completing a feature - When working in an area with past learnings - Weekly during active development ### Quick Status Check ```bash # Count pending items grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l # List pending high-priority items grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \[" # Find learnings for a specific area grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md ``` ### Review Actions - Resolve fixed items - Promote applicable learnings - Link related entries - Escalate recurring issues ## Detection Triggers Automatically log when you notice: **Corrections** (→ learning with `correction` category): - "No, that's not right..." - "Actually, it should be..." - "You're wrong about..." - "That's outdated..." **Feature Requests** (→ feature request): - "Can you also..." - "I wish you could..." - "Is there a way to..." - "Why can't you..." **Knowledge Gaps** (→ learning with `knowledge_gap` category): - User provides information you didn't know - Documentation you referenced is outdated - API behavior differs from your understanding **Errors** (→ error entry): - Command returns non-zero exit code - Exception or stack trace - Unexpected output or behavior - Timeout or connection failure **Skill Improvement Needed** (→ improvement proposal in `.learnings/pending-improvements/`): - Skill produced wrong output or used wrong approach - Skill instructions are outdated or incomplete - Skill failed to handle an edge case - User manually corrected a skill's output - Multiple errors logged against the same skill - **NEVER modify the skill directly** — create a proposal instead **Improvement Review Requested** (→ list pending proposals): - "What skill improvements do you recommend?" - "Show me pending skill updates" - "Any skill fixes waiting?" - "What needs updating?" **Auto-Update Authorization** (→ update `AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md`): - "Allow auto-updates for [skill-name]" - "Let [skill-name] self-improve" - "Stop auto-updating [skill-name]" - "Require approval for [skill-name]" ## Priority Guidelines | Priority | When to Use | |----------|-------------| | `critical` | Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue | | `high` | Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue | | `medium` | Moderate impact, workaround exists | | `low` | Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have | ## Area Tags Use to filter learnings by codebase region: | Area | Scope | |------|-------| | `frontend` | UI, components, client-side code | | `backend` | API, services, server-side code | | `infra` | CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud | | `tests` | Test files, testing utilities, coverage | | `docs` | Documentation, comments, READMEs | | `config` | Configuration files, environment, settings | ## Best Practices 1. **Log immediately** - context is freshest right after the issue 2. **Be specific** - future agents need to understand quickly 3. **Include reproduction steps** - especially for errors 4. **Link related files** - makes fixes easier 5. **Suggest concrete fixes** - not just "investigate" 6. **Use consistent categories** - enables filtering 7. **Promote aggressively** - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md 8. **Review regularly** - stale learnings lose value ## Gitignore Options **Keep learnings local** (per-developer): ```gitignore .learnings/ ``` This repo uses that default to avoid committing sensitive or noisy local logs by accident. **Track learnings in repo** (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge. **Hybrid** (track templates, ignore entries): ```gitignore .learnings/*.md !.learnings/.gitkeep ``` ## Hook Integration Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is **opt-in** - you must explicitly configure hooks. ### Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex) Create `.claude/settings.json` in your project: ```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }] } } ``` This injects a learning evaluation reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead). ### Advanced Setup (With Error Detection) ```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }], "PostToolUse": [{ "matcher": "Bash", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh" }] }] } } ``` This is optional. The recommended default is activator-only setup; enable `PostToolUse` only if you are comfortable with hook scripts inspecting command output for error patterns. ### Available Hook Scripts | Script | Hook Type | Purpose | |--------|-----------|---------| | `scripts/activator.sh` | UserPromptSubmit | Reminds to evaluate learnings after tasks | | `scripts/error-detector.sh` | PostToolUse (Bash) | Triggers on command errors | See `references/hooks-setup.md` for detailed configuration and troubleshooting. ## Approval-Gated Skill Improvement **CRITICAL RULE: Never modify any skill file without explicit user approval.** When a skill fails or could be improved, document the proposed changes as an improvement proposal. The user decides whether to apply them. ### Core Principles 1. **No silent updates**: AI must never edit a skill's SKILL.md, scripts, or references without the user saying yes 2. **Document first, change never (unless approved)**: Every proposed fix goes into a proposal file in `.learnings/pending-improvements/` 3. **Proactive notification on recurrence**: If a failure matches an existing proposal, tell the user immediately and recommend applying it 4. **Per-skill auto-update opt-in**: Users can authorize specific skills for automatic updates — but the default is always **approval required** ### When a Skill Fails — What To Do When a skill produces an error, wrong output, or suboptimal result: 1. **Log the error** to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` as usual 2. **Check for existing proposal**: `ls .learnings/pending-improvements/*-<skill-name>.md 2>/dev/null` 3. **If a proposal already exists for this skill**: - Add the new occurrence to the proposal's **Recurrence Log** table - **Notify the user immediately**: _"I've encountered this issue with the [skill-name] skill again. We already have a documented fix (IMP-XXXXXXXX-XXX). Would you like me to apply the proposed changes?"_ - Present a summary of what the proposal would change - Wait for explicit approval before touching anything 4. **If no proposal exists yet**: - Analyze the failure and determine what skill changes would fix it - Create a new proposal file: `.learnings/pending-improvements/IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX-skill-name.md` - Inform the user: _"I've documented a proposed improvement to the [skill-name] skill. You can review it anytime by asking 'what skill improvements do you recommend?'"_ - Do NOT apply the changes 5. **Check auto-update authorization**: Before creating a proposal, check `.learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md`. If this specific skill is listed as authorized for auto-update, apply the fix directly, then inform the user what was changed. Otherwise, follow steps 3-4. ### Improvement Proposal Format Save each proposal as its own file in `.learnings/pending-improvements/` named `IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX-skill-name.md`: ```markdown # Improvement Proposal: IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX **Skill**: skill-name **Skill Path**: path/to/skill/SKILL.md **Created**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Status**: pending | approved | rejected | applied **Priority**: low | medium | high | critical **Triggered By**: error | user_feedback | recurring_pattern | knowledge_gap ## Problem What went wrong. Reference error IDs (e.g., ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX) if applicable. ## Root Cause Why the skill failed or produced suboptimal results. ## Proposed Changes ### Change 1: [add | modify | remove] — [brief label] **Section**: Which section of the SKILL.md is affected **Current Content** (if modifying/removing): \``` Existing text or instruction that needs changing \``` **Proposed Content** (if adding/modifying): \``` New or updated text or instruction \``` **Rationale**: Why this change fixes the problem ### Change 2: [add | modify | remove] — [brief label] (repeat as needed) ## Expected Impact What will improve after applying these changes. ## Recurrence Log | Date | Error/Context | Notes | |------|--------------|-------| | YYYY-MM-DD | ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX | First occurrence | --- ``` ### User-Triggered Review of Pending Improvements The user can ask for a review of all pending improvement proposals at any time. Trigger phrases include: - "What skill improvements do you recommend?" - "Show me pending skill updates" - "Any skill fixes waiting?" - "What skills need updating?" - "Review skill improvement proposals" When triggered: 1. **List all files** in `.learnings/pending-improvements/` with status `pending` 2. **For each proposal**, present a clear summary: - Which skill it affects - What the problem is (one sentence) - What changes are proposed (bullet list of add/modify/remove) - How many times the issue has recurred - Priority level 3. **Ask the user** which proposals they want to approve, reject, or defer 4. **On approval**: Apply the changes to the skill, update proposal status to `applied`, add resolution timestamp 5. **On rejection**: Update proposal status to `rejected`, add user's reason if given 6. **On defer**: Leave as `pending`, no changes ### Applying Approved Changes When the user approves a proposal: 1. Read the full proposal file 2. For each proposed change: - If `add`: Insert the new content at the specified section - If `modify`: Replace the current content with the proposed content - If `remove`: Delete the specified content 3. Update the proposal file: - Set `**Status**: applied` - Add `**Applied**: ISO-8601 timestamp` after Status - Add `**Applied By**: user-approved` after Applied 4. Log a learning entry in `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` noting the skill improvement was applied 5. Confirm to the user exactly what was changed ### Auto-Update Authorization By default, **no skill is authorized for auto-update**. The user must explicitly grant permission on a per-skill basis. **How to authorize a skill for auto-update:** The user says something like: - "Allow auto-updates for the [skill-name] skill" - "The [skill-name] skill can self-improve without asking me" - "Auto-approve improvements to [skill-name]" When authorized: 1. Add an entry to `.learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md`: ```markdown ## [skill-name] **Authorized**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Authorized By**: user **Scope**: full **Notes**: User authorized auto-update in conversation --- ``` 2. Confirm to the user: _"I've authorized auto-updates for [skill-name]. Future improvements to this skill will be applied automatically and I'll inform you what changed. You can revoke this anytime."_ **How to revoke auto-update:** The user says something like: - "Stop auto-updating [skill-name]" - "Require approval for [skill-name] again" - "Revoke auto-update for [skill-name]" When revoked: Remove the entry from `AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md` and confirm. **Checking authorization before applying changes:** ```bash grep -l "## skill-name-here" .learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md 2>/dev/null ``` If the skill is listed AND its entry is present (not just the file header), it is authorized. Otherwise, require user approval. ### Auto-Update Behavior When a skill IS authorized for auto-update and a failure is detected: 1. Analyze the failure and determine the fix 2. Check if a pending proposal already exists — if so, apply it 3. If no proposal exists, create one with status `applied` (for the record) and apply the fix 4. **Always inform the user** what was changed: _"I auto-applied an improvement to [skill-name]: [one-line summary of change]. This skill is authorized for auto-update. Details logged in IMP-XXXXXXXX-XXX."_ 5. Log the change in `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` ### Detection Triggers for Skill Improvements Watch for these signals that a skill needs an improvement proposal: **During skill execution:** - Skill produces an error or unexpected output - Skill's instructions lead to a wrong approach - Skill is missing a step that was needed - Skill references outdated tools, APIs, or syntax - User has to manually correct the skill's output **From error logs:** - Multiple errors logged against the same skill (check `See Also` links) - Error with `Reproducible: yes` tied to a skill **From user feedback:** - "This skill keeps getting X wrong" - "The skill should also handle Y" - "That's not how you do X anymore" ## Automatic Skill Extraction When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper. ### Skill Extraction Criteria A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply: | Criterion | Description | |-----------|-------------| | **Recurring** | Has `See Also` links to 2+ similar issues | | **Verified** | Status is `resolved` with working fix | | **Non-obvious** | Required actual debugging/investigation to discover | | **Broadly applicable** | Not project-specific; useful across codebases | | **User-flagged** | User says "save this as a skill" or similar | ### Extraction Workflow 1. **Identify candidate**: Learning meets extraction criteria 2. **Run helper** (or create manually): ```bash ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name ``` 3. **Customize SKILL.md**: Fill in template with learning content 4. **Update learning**: Set status to `promoted_to_skill`, add `Skill-Path` 5. **Verify**: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained ### Manual Extraction If you prefer manual creation: 1. Create `skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` 2. Use template from `assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md` 3. Follow [Agent Skills spec](https://agentskills.io/specification): - YAML frontmatter with `name` and `description` - Name must match folder name - No README.md inside skill folder ### Extraction Detection Triggers Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill: **In conversation:** - "Save this as a skill" - "I keep running into this" - "This would be useful for other projects" - "Remember this pattern" **In learning entries:** - Multiple `See Also` links (recurring issue) - High priority + resolved status - Category: `best_practice` with broad applicability - User feedback praising the solution ### Skill Quality Gates Before extraction, verify: - [ ] Solution is tested and working - [ ] Description is clear without original context - [ ] Code examples are self-contained - [ ] No project-specific hardcoded values - [ ] Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens) ## Multi-Agent Support This skill works across different AI coding agents with agent-specific activation. ### Claude Code **Activation**: Hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse) **Setup**: `.claude/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts ### Codex CLI **Activation**: Hooks (same pattern as Claude Code) **Setup**: `.codex/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts ### GitHub Copilot **Activation**: Manual (no hook support) **Setup**: Add to `.github/copilot-instructions.md`: ```markdown ## Self-Improvement After solving non-obvious issues, consider logging to `.learnings/`: 1. Use format from self-improvement skill 2. Link related entries with See Also 3. Promote high-value learnings to skills Ask in chat: "Should I log this as a learning?" ``` **Detection**: Manual review at session end

path: scripts/error-detector.sh
content: #!/bin/bash
# Self-Improvement Error Detector Hook
# Triggers on PostToolUse for Bash to detect command failures
# Reads CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT environment variable
# Also checks for matching pending improvement proposals

set -e

# Check if tool output indicates an error
# CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT contains the result of the tool execution
OUTPUT="${CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT:-}"

# Patterns indicating errors (case-insensitive matching)
ERROR_PATTERNS=(
    "error:"
    "Error:"
    "ERROR:"
    "failed"
    "FAILED"
    "command not found"
    "No such file"
    "Permission denied"
    "fatal:"
    "Exception"
    "Traceback"
    "npm ERR!"
    "ModuleNotFoundError"
    "SyntaxError"
    "TypeError"
    "exit code"
    "non-zero"
)

# Check if output contains any error pattern
contains_error=false
for pattern in "${ERROR_PATTERNS[@]}"; do
    if [[ "$OUTPUT" == *"$pattern"* ]]; then
        contains_error=true
        break
    fi
done

# Only output reminder if error detected
if [ "$contains_error" = true ]; then
    cat << 'EOF'
<error-detected>
A command error was detected. Consider logging this to .learnings/ERRORS.md if:
- The error was unexpected or non-obvious
- It required investigation to resolve
- It might recur in similar contexts
- The solution could benefit future sessions

Use the self-improvement skill format: [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

If this error is related to a SKILL failure:
1. Check .learnings/pending-improvements/ for an existing proposal matching this skill
2. If a proposal exists: notify the user that we have a documented fix and recommend applying it
3. If no proposal exists: create one — do NOT modify the skill directly
4. Exception: if the skill is listed in .learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md, apply the fix directly and inform the user

CRITICAL: Never modify any skill without explicit user approval unless auto-update is authorized.
</error-detected>
EOF

    # Check if there are any pending proposals that might match
    PENDING_DIR=".learnings/pending-improvements"
    if [ -d "$PENDING_DIR" ]; then
        PENDING_FILES=$(find "$PENDING_DIR" -name "IMP-*.md" 2>/dev/null)
        if [ -n "$PENDING_FILES" ]; then
            cat << 'EOF'
<pending-proposals-available>
There are existing improvement proposals in .learnings/pending-improvements/.
Check if this error matches any pending proposal. If it does, add a recurrence
entry to the proposal and notify the user that a known fix is available.
</pending-proposals-available>
EOF
        fi
    fi
fi


path: scripts/extract-skill.sh
content: #!/bin/bash
# Skill Extraction Helper
# Creates a new skill from a learning entry
# Usage: ./extract-skill.sh <skill-name> [--dry-run]

set -e

# Configuration
SKILLS_DIR="./skills"

# Colors for output
RED='\033[0;31m'
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
NC='\033[0m' # No Color

usage() {
    cat << EOF
Usage: $(basename "$0") <skill-name> [options]

Create a new skill from a learning entry.

Arguments:
  skill-name     Name of the skill (lowercase, hyphens for spaces)

Options:
  --dry-run      Show what would be created without creating files
  --output-dir   Relative output directory under current path (default: ./skills)
  -h, --help     Show this help message

Examples:
  $(basename "$0") docker-m1-fixes
  $(basename "$0") api-timeout-patterns --dry-run
  $(basename "$0") pnpm-setup --output-dir ./skills/custom

The skill will be created in: \$SKILLS_DIR/<skill-name>/
EOF
}

log_info() {
    echo -e "${GREEN}[INFO]${NC} $1"
}

log_warn() {
    echo -e "${YELLOW}[WARN]${NC} $1"
}

log_error() {
    echo -e "${RED}[ERROR]${NC} $1" >&2
}

# Parse arguments
SKILL_NAME=""
DRY_RUN=false

while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
    case $1 in
        --dry-run)
            DRY_RUN=true
            shift
            ;;
        --output-dir)
            if [ -z "${2:-}" ] || [[ "${2:-}" == -* ]]; then
                log_error "--output-dir requires a relative path argument"
                usage
                exit 1
            fi
            SKILLS_DIR="$2"
            shift 2
            ;;
        -h|--help)
            usage
            exit 0
            ;;
        -*)
            log_error "Unknown option: $1"
            usage
            exit 1
            ;;
        *)
            if [ -z "$SKILL_NAME" ]; then
                SKILL_NAME="$1"
            else
                log_error "Unexpected argument: $1"
                usage
                exit 1
            fi
            shift
            ;;
    esac
done

# Validate skill name
if [ -z "$SKILL_NAME" ]; then
    log_error "Skill name is required"
    usage
    exit 1
fi

# Validate skill name format (lowercase, hyphens, no spaces)
if ! [[ "$SKILL_NAME" =~ ^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$ ]]; then
    log_error "Invalid skill name format. Use lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens only."
    log_error "Examples: 'docker-fixes', 'api-patterns', 'pnpm-setup'"
    exit 1
fi

# Validate output path to avoid writes outside current workspace.
if [[ "$SKILLS_DIR" = /* ]]; then
    log_error "Output directory must be a relative path under the current directory."
    exit 1
fi

if [[ "$SKILLS_DIR" =~ (^|/)\.\.(/|$) ]]; then
    log_error "Output directory cannot include '..' path segments."
    exit 1
fi

SKILLS_DIR="${SKILLS_DIR#./}"
SKILLS_DIR="./$SKILLS_DIR"

SKILL_PATH="$SKILLS_DIR/$SKILL_NAME"

# Check if skill already exists
if [ -d "$SKILL_PATH" ] && [ "$DRY_RUN" = false ]; then
    log_error "Skill already exists: $SKILL_PATH"
    log_error "Use a different name or remove the existing skill first."
    exit 1
fi

# Dry run output
if [ "$DRY_RUN" = true ]; then
    log_info "Dry run - would create:"
    echo "  $SKILL_PATH/"
    echo "  $SKILL_PATH/SKILL.md"
    echo ""
    echo "Template content would be:"
    echo "---"
    cat << TEMPLATE
name: $SKILL_NAME
description: "[TODO: Add a concise description of what this skill does and when to use it]"
---

# $(echo "$SKILL_NAME" | sed 's/-/ /g' | awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++) $i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) tolower(substr($i,2))}1')

[TODO: Brief introduction explaining the skill's purpose]

## Quick Reference

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| [Trigger condition] | [What to do] |

## Usage

[TODO: Detailed usage instructions]

## Examples

[TODO: Add concrete examples]

## Source Learning

This skill was extracted from a learning entry.
- Learning ID: [TODO: Add original learning ID]
- Original File: .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
TEMPLATE
    echo "---"
    exit 0
fi

# Create skill directory structure
log_info "Creating skill: $SKILL_NAME"

mkdir -p "$SKILL_PATH"

# Create SKILL.md from template
cat > "$SKILL_PATH/SKILL.md" << TEMPLATE
---
name: $SKILL_NAME
description: "[TODO: Add a concise description of what this skill does and when to use it]"
---

# $(echo "$SKILL_NAME" | sed 's/-/ /g' | awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++) $i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) tolower(substr($i,2))}1')

[TODO: Brief introduction explaining the skill's purpose]

## Quick Reference

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| [Trigger condition] | [What to do] |

## Usage

[TODO: Detailed usage instructions]

## Examples

[TODO: Add concrete examples]

## Source Learning

This skill was extracted from a learning entry.
- Learning ID: [TODO: Add original learning ID]
- Original File: .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
TEMPLATE

log_info "Created: $SKILL_PATH/SKILL.md"

# Suggest next steps
echo ""
log_info "Skill scaffold created successfully!"
echo ""
echo "Next steps:"
echo "  1. Edit $SKILL_PATH/SKILL.md"
echo "  2. Fill in the TODO sections with content from your learning"
echo "  3. Add references/ folder if you have detailed documentation"
echo "  4. Add scripts/ folder if you have executable code"
echo "  5. Update the original learning entry with:"
echo "     **Status**: promoted_to_skill"
echo "     **Skill-Path**: skills/$SKILL_NAME"


path: scripts/activator.sh
content: #!/bin/bash
# Self-Improvement Activator Hook
# Triggers on UserPromptSubmit to remind Claude about learning capture
# and pending improvement proposals
# Keep output minimal (~50-100 tokens) to minimize overhead

set -e

# Output reminder as system context
cat << 'EOF'
<self-improvement-reminder>
After completing this task, evaluate if extractable knowledge emerged:
- Non-obvious solution discovered through investigation?
- Workaround for unexpected behavior?
- Project-specific pattern learned?
- Error required debugging to resolve?
- Skill produced wrong output or failed?

If yes: Log to .learnings/ using the self-improvement skill format.
If a skill failed: Create or update an improvement proposal in .learnings/pending-improvements/ — do NOT modify the skill directly unless it is authorized for auto-update in .learnings/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md.
If a failure matches an existing proposal: Notify the user and recommend applying it.
If high-value (recurring, broadly applicable): Consider skill extraction.

CRITICAL: Never modify any skill without explicit user approval unless auto-update is authorized for that specific skill.
</self-improvement-reminder>
EOF

# Check for pending improvement proposals and notify
PENDING_DIR=".learnings/pending-improvements"
if [ -d "$PENDING_DIR" ]; then
    PENDING_COUNT=$(find "$PENDING_DIR" -name "IMP-*.md" -exec grep -l "Status\*\*: pending" {} \; 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
    if [ "$PENDING_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then
        cat << EOF
<pending-improvements-notice>
There are $PENDING_COUNT pending skill improvement proposal(s) awaiting user review.
If a skill failure occurs that matches an existing proposal, notify the user and recommend applying it.
The user can review all proposals by asking: "What skill improvements do you recommend?"
</pending-improvements-notice>
EOF
    fi
fi


path: README.md
content: # self-improvement

Self-improvement skill for OpenClaw. It captures learnings, errors, and feature requests to support continuous improvement across sessions.

## Attribution

Remade for OpenClaw from the original repo:

- https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
- https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/tree/main/skills/self-improvement

## Main File

- `SKILL.md`


path: references/examples.md
content: # Entry Examples

Concrete examples of well-formatted entries with all fields.

## Learning: Correction

```markdown
## [LRN-20250115-001] correction

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: tests

### Summary
Incorrectly assumed pytest fixtures are scoped to function by default

### Details
When writing test fixtures, I assumed all fixtures were function-scoped. 
User corrected that while function scope is the default, the codebase 
convention uses module-scoped fixtures for database connections to 
improve test performance.

### Suggested Action
When creating fixtures that involve expensive setup (DB, network), 
check existing fixtures for scope patterns before defaulting to function scope.

### Metadata
- Source: user_feedback
- Related Files: tests/conftest.py
- Tags: pytest, testing, fixtures

---
```

## Learning: Knowledge Gap (Resolved)

```markdown
## [LRN-20250115-002] knowledge_gap

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T14:22:00Z
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: resolved
**Area**: config

### Summary
Project uses pnpm not npm for package management

### Details
Attempted to run `npm install` but project uses pnpm workspaces.
Lock file is `pnpm-lock.yaml`, not `package-lock.json`.

### Suggested Action
Check for `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `pnpm-workspace.yaml` before assuming npm.
Use `pnpm install` for this project.

### Metadata
- Source: error
- Related Files: pnpm-lock.yaml, pnpm-workspace.yaml
- Tags: package-manager, pnpm, setup

### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-15T14:30:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: N/A - knowledge update
- **Notes**: Added to CLAUDE.md for future reference

---
```

## Learning: Promoted to CLAUDE.md

```markdown
## [LRN-20250115-003] best_practice

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T16:00:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: promoted
**Promoted**: CLAUDE.md
**Area**: backend

### Summary
API responses must include correlation ID from request headers

### Details
All API responses should echo back the X-Correlation-ID header from 
the request. This is required for distributed tracing. Responses 
without this header break the observability pipeline.

### Suggested Action
Always include correlation ID passthrough in API handlers.

### Metadata
- Source: user_feedback
- Related Files: src/middleware/correlation.ts
- Tags: api, observability, tracing

---
```

## Learning: Promoted to AGENTS.md

```markdown
## [LRN-20250116-001] best_practice

**Logged**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: promoted
**Promoted**: AGENTS.md
**Area**: backend

### Summary
Must regenerate API client after OpenAPI spec changes

### Details
When modifying API endpoints, the TypeScript client must be regenerated.
Forgetting this causes type mismatches that only appear at runtime.
The generate script also runs validation.

### Suggested Action
Add to agent workflow: after any API changes, run `pnpm run generate:api`.

### Metadata
- Source: error
- Related Files: openapi.yaml, src/client/api.ts
- Tags: api, codegen, typescript

---
```

## Error Entry

```markdown
## [ERR-20250115-A3F] docker_build

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T09:15:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: infra

### Summary
Docker build fails on M1 Mac due to platform mismatch

### Error
```
error: failed to solve: python:3.11-slim: no match for platform linux/arm64
```

### Context
- Command: `docker build -t myapp .`
- Dockerfile uses `FROM python:3.11-slim`
- Running on Apple Silicon (M1/M2)

### Suggested Fix
Add platform flag: `docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t myapp .`
Or update Dockerfile: `FROM --platform=linux/amd64 python:3.11-slim`

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes
- Related Files: Dockerfile

---
```

## Error Entry: Recurring Issue

```markdown
## [ERR-20250120-B2C] api_timeout

**Logged**: 2025-01-20T11:30:00Z
**Priority**: critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: backend

### Summary
Third-party API timeout during request processing

### Error
```
TimeoutError: Request to api.example.com timed out after 30000ms
```

### Context
- Command: POST /api/process
- Timeout set to 30s
- Occurs during peak hours (lunch, evening)

### Suggested Fix
Implement retry with exponential backoff. Consider circuit breaker pattern.

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes (during peak hours)
- Related Files: src/services/api-client.ts
- See Also: ERR-20250115-X1Y, ERR-20250118-Z3W

---
```

## Feature Request

```markdown
## [FEAT-20250115-001] export_to_csv

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T16:45:00Z
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: backend

### Requested Capability
Export analysis results to CSV format

### User Context
User runs weekly reports and needs to share results with non-technical 
stakeholders in Excel. Currently copies output manually.

### Complexity Estimate
simple

### Suggested Implementation
Add `--output csv` flag to the analyze command. Use standard csv module.
Could extend existing `--output json` pattern.

### Metadata
- Frequency: recurring
- Related Features: analyze command, json output

---
```

## Feature Request: Resolved

```markdown
## [FEAT-20250110-002] dark_mode

**Logged**: 2025-01-10T14:00:00Z
**Priority**: low
**Status**: resolved
**Area**: frontend

### Requested Capability
Dark mode support for the dashboard

### User Context
User works late hours and finds the bright interface straining.
Several other users have mentioned this informally.

### Complexity Estimate
medium

### Suggested Implementation
Use CSS variables for colors. Add toggle in user settings.
Consider system preference detection.

### Metadata
- Frequency: recurring
- Related Features: user settings, theme system

### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-18T16:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: #142
- **Notes**: Implemented with system preference detection and manual toggle

---
```

## Learning: Promoted to Skill

```markdown
## [LRN-20250118-001] best_practice

**Logged**: 2025-01-18T11:00:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: promoted_to_skill
**Skill-Path**: skills/docker-m1-fixes
**Area**: infra

### Summary
Docker build fails on Apple Silicon due to platform mismatch

### Details
When building Docker images on M1/M2 Macs, the build fails because
the base image doesn't have an ARM64 variant. This is a common issue
that affects many developers.

### Suggested Action
Add `--platform linux/amd64` to docker build command, or use
`FROM --platform=linux/amd64` in Dockerfile.

### Metadata
- Source: error
- Related Files: Dockerfile
- Tags: docker, arm64, m1, apple-silicon
- See Also: ERR-20250115-A3F, ERR-20250117-B2D

---
```

## Extracted Skill Example

When the above learning is extracted as a skill, it becomes:

**File**: `skills/docker-m1-fixes/SKILL.md`

```markdown
---
name: docker-m1-fixes
description: "Fixes Docker build failures on Apple Silicon (M1/M2). Use when docker build fails with platform mismatch errors."
---

# Docker M1 Fixes

Solutions for Docker build issues on Apple Silicon Macs.

## Quick Reference

| Error | Fix |
|-------|-----|
| `no match for platform linux/arm64` | Add `--platform linux/amd64` to build |
| Image runs but crashes | Use emulation or find ARM-compatible base |

## The Problem

Many Docker base images don't have ARM64 variants. When building on
Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3), Docker attempts to pull ARM64 images by
default, causing platform mismatch errors.

## Solutions

### Option 1: Build Flag (Recommended)

Add platform flag to your build command:

\`\`\`bash
docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t myapp .
\`\`\`

### Option 2: Dockerfile Modification

Specify platform in the FROM instruction:

\`\`\`dockerfile
FROM --platform=linux/amd64 python:3.11-slim
\`\`\`

### Option 3: Docker Compose

Add platform to your service:

\`\`\`yaml
services:
  app:
    platform: linux/amd64
    build: .
\`\`\`

## Trade-offs

| Approach | Pros | Cons |
|----------|------|------|
| Build flag | No file changes | Must remember flag |
| Dockerfile | Explicit, versioned | Affects all builds |
| Compose | Convenient for dev | Requires compose |

## Performance Note

Running AMD64 images on ARM64 uses Rosetta 2 emulation. This works
for development but may be slower. For production, find ARM-native
alternatives when possible.

## Source

- Learning ID: LRN-20250118-001
- Category: best_practice
- Extraction Date: 2025-01-18
```


path: references/hooks-setup.md
content: # Hook Setup Guide

Configure automatic self-improvement triggers for AI coding agents.

## Overview

Hooks enable proactive learning capture by injecting reminders at key moments:
- **UserPromptSubmit**: Reminder after each prompt to evaluate learnings
- **PostToolUse (Bash)**: Error detection when commands fail

## Claude Code Setup

### Option 1: Project-Level Configuration

Create `.claude/settings.json` in your project root:

```json
{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [
      {
        "matcher": "",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "PostToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": "Bash",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

### Option 2: User-Level Configuration

Add to `~/.claude/settings.json` for global activation:

```json
{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [
      {
        "matcher": "",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "~/.claude/skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

### Minimal Setup (Activator Only)

For lower overhead, use only the UserPromptSubmit hook:

```json
{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [
      {
        "matcher": "",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

## Codex CLI Setup

Codex uses the same hook system as Claude Code. Create `.codex/settings.json`:

```json
{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [
      {
        "matcher": "",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

## GitHub Copilot Setup

Copilot doesn't support hooks directly. Instead, add guidance to `.github/copilot-instructions.md`:

```markdown
## Self-Improvement

After completing tasks that involved:
- Debugging non-obvious issues
- Discovering workarounds
- Learning project-specific patterns
- Resolving unexpected errors

Consider logging the learning to `.learnings/` using the format from the self-improvement skill.

For high-value learnings that would benefit other sessions, consider skill extraction.
```

## Verification

### Test Activator Hook

1. Enable the hook configuration
2. Start a new Claude Code session
3. Send any prompt
4. Verify you see `<self-improvement-reminder>` in the context

### Test Error Detector Hook

1. Enable PostToolUse hook for Bash
2. Run a command that fails: `ls /nonexistent/path`
3. Verify you see `<error-detected>` reminder

### Dry Run Extract Script

```bash
./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh test-skill --dry-run
```

Expected output shows the skill scaffold that would be created.

## Troubleshooting

### Hook Not Triggering

1. **Check script permissions**: `chmod +x scripts/*.sh`
2. **Verify path**: Use absolute paths or paths relative to project root
3. **Check settings location**: Project vs user-level settings
4. **Restart session**: Hooks are loaded at session start

### Permission Denied

```bash
chmod +x ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh
chmod +x ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh
chmod +x ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh
```

### Script Not Found

If using relative paths, ensure you're in the correct directory or use absolute paths:

```json
{
  "command": "/absolute/path/to/skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
}
```

### Too Much Overhead

If the activator feels intrusive:

1. **Use minimal setup**: Only UserPromptSubmit, skip PostToolUse
2. **Add matcher filter**: Only trigger for certain prompts:

```json
{
  "matcher": "fix|debug|error|issue",
  "hooks": [...]
}
```

## Hook Output Budget

The activator is designed to be lightweight:
- **Target**: ~50-100 tokens per activation
- **Content**: Structured reminder, not verbose instructions
- **Format**: XML tags for easy parsing

If you need to reduce overhead further, you can edit `activator.sh` to output less text.

## Security Considerations

- Hook scripts run with the same permissions as Claude Code
- Scripts only output text; they don't modify files or run commands
- Error detector reads `CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT` environment variable
- Treat `CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT` as potentially sensitive; do not log or forward it verbatim unless the user explicitly wants that detail
- All scripts are opt-in (you must configure them explicitly)
- Recommended default: enable `UserPromptSubmit` only, and add `PostToolUse` only when you want error-pattern reminders from command output

## Disabling Hooks

To temporarily disable without removing configuration:

1. **Comment out in settings**:
```json
{
  "hooks": {
    // "UserPromptSubmit": [...]
  }
}
```

2. **Or delete the settings file**: Hooks won't run without configuration


path: references/openclaw-integration.md
content: # OpenClaw Integration

Complete setup and usage guide for integrating the self-improvement skill with OpenClaw.

## Overview

OpenClaw uses workspace-based prompt injection combined with event-driven hooks. Context is injected from workspace files at session start, and hooks can trigger on lifecycle events.

## Workspace Structure

```
~/.openclaw/                      
├── workspace/                   # Working directory
│   ├── AGENTS.md               # Multi-agent coordination patterns
│   ├── SOUL.md                 # Behavioral guidelines and personality
│   ├── TOOLS.md                # Tool capabilities and gotchas
│   ├── MEMORY.md               # Long-term memory (main session only)
│   └── memory/                 # Daily memory files
│       └── YYYY-MM-DD.md
├── skills/                      # Installed skills
│   └── <skill-name>/
│       └── SKILL.md
└── hooks/                       # Custom hooks
    └── <hook-name>/
        ├── HOOK.md
        └── handler.ts
```

## Quick Setup

### 1. Install the Skill

```bash
clawdhub install self-improving-agent
```

Or copy manually:

```bash
cp -r self-improving-agent ~/.openclaw/skills/
```

### 2. Install the Hook (Optional)

Copy the hook to OpenClaw's hooks directory:

```bash
cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improvement
```

Enable the hook:

```bash
openclaw hooks enable self-improvement
```

### 3. Create Learning Files

Create the `.learnings/` directory in your workspace:

```bash
mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings
```

Or in the skill directory:

```bash
mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-agent/.learnings
```

## Injected Prompt Files

### AGENTS.md

Purpose: Multi-agent workflows and delegation patterns.

```markdown
# Agent Coordination

## Delegation Rules
- Use explore agent for open-ended codebase questions
- Spawn sub-agents for long-running tasks
- Use sessions_send for cross-session communication

## Session Handoff
When delegating to another session:
1. Provide full context in the handoff message
2. Include relevant file paths
3. Specify expected output format
```

### SOUL.md

Purpose: Behavioral guidelines and communication style.

```markdown
# Behavioral Guidelines

## Communication Style
- Be direct and concise
- Avoid unnecessary caveats and disclaimers
- Use technical language appropriate to context

## Error Handling
- Admit mistakes promptly
- Provide corrected information immediately
- Log significant errors to learnings
```

### TOOLS.md

Purpose: Tool capabilities, integration gotchas, local configuration.

```markdown
# Tool Knowledge

## Self-Improvement Skill
Log learnings to `.learnings/` for continuous improvement.

## Local Tools
- Document tool-specific gotchas here
- Note authentication requirements
- Track integration quirks
```

## Learning Workflow

### Capturing Learnings

1. **In-session**: Log to `.learnings/` as usual
2. **Cross-session**: Promote to workspace files

### Promotion Decision Tree

```
Is the learning project-specific?
├── Yes → Keep in .learnings/
└── No → Is it behavioral/style-related?
    ├── Yes → Promote to SOUL.md
    └── No → Is it tool-related?
        ├── Yes → Promote to TOOLS.md
        └── No → Promote to AGENTS.md (workflow)
```

### Promotion Format Examples

**From learning:**
> Git push to GitHub fails without auth configured - triggers desktop prompt

**To TOOLS.md:**
```markdown
## Git
- Don't push without confirming auth is configured
- Use `gh auth status` to check GitHub CLI auth
```

## Inter-Agent Communication

OpenClaw provides tools for cross-session communication:

Use these only when cross-session sharing is explicitly needed and the environment is trusted. Prefer short sanitized summaries over raw transcripts, command output, or secret-bearing content.

### sessions_list

View active and recent sessions:
```
sessions_list(activeMinutes=30, messageLimit=3)
```

### sessions_history

Read transcript from another session:
```
sessions_history(sessionKey="session-id", limit=50)
```

Only read another session's transcript when the user explicitly wants shared context or continuation across sessions.

### sessions_send

Send message to another session:
```
sessions_send(sessionKey="session-id", message="Learning: API requires X-Custom-Header")
```

Prefer sending a concise learning summary plus relevant paths rather than forwarding raw transcript content.

### sessions_spawn

Spawn a background sub-agent:
```
sessions_spawn(task="Research X and report back", label="research")
```

## Available Hook Events

| Event | When It Fires |
|-------|---------------|
| `agent:bootstrap` | Before workspace files inject |
| `command:new` | When `/new` command issued |
| `command:reset` | When `/reset` command issued |
| `command:stop` | When `/stop` command issued |
| `gateway:startup` | When gateway starts |

## Detection Triggers

### Standard Triggers
- User corrections ("No, that's wrong...")
- Command failures (non-zero exit codes)
- API errors
- Knowledge gaps

### OpenClaw-Specific Triggers

| Trigger | Action |
|---------|--------|
| Tool call error | Log to TOOLS.md with tool name |
| Session handoff confusion | Log to AGENTS.md with delegation pattern |
| Model behavior surprise | Log to SOUL.md with expected vs actual |
| Skill issue | Log to .learnings/ or report upstream |

## Verification

Check hook is registered:

```bash
openclaw hooks list
```

Check skill is loaded:

```bash
openclaw status
```

## Troubleshooting

### Hook not firing

1. Ensure hooks enabled in config
2. Restart gateway after config changes
3. Check gateway logs for errors

### Learnings not persisting

1. Verify `.learnings/` directory exists
2. Check file permissions
3. Ensure workspace path is configured correctly

### Skill not loading

1. Check skill is in skills directory
2. Verify SKILL.md has correct frontmatter
3. Run `openclaw status` to see loaded skills


path: hooks/openclaw/handler.ts
content: /**
 * Self-Improvement Hook for OpenClaw
 * 
 * Injects a reminder to evaluate learnings during agent bootstrap.
 * Fires on agent:bootstrap event before workspace files are injected.
 */

import type { HookHandler } from 'openclaw/hooks';

const REMINDER_NAME = 'SELF_IMPROVEMENT_REMINDER.md';
const REMINDER_PATH = REMINDER_NAME;

const REMINDER_CONTENT = `## Self-Improvement Reminder

After completing tasks, evaluate whether any learnings should be captured.

Only log if this repo or workspace is using the self-improvement skill.

Before logging:
- Create only missing \`.learnings/\` files; never overwrite existing content
- Do not log secrets, tokens, private keys, environment variables, or raw transcripts
- Prefer short summaries or redacted excerpts over full command output

**Log when:**
- User corrects you → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`
- Command/operation fails → \`.learnings/ERRORS.md\`
- User wants missing capability → \`.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md\`
- You discover your knowledge was wrong → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`
- You find a better approach → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`

**Promote when pattern is proven:**
- Behavioral patterns → \`SOUL.md\`
- Workflow improvements → \`AGENTS.md\`
- Tool gotchas → \`TOOLS.md\`

Keep entries simple: date, title, what happened, and what to do differently.`;

function isObject(value: unknown): value is Record<string, unknown> {
  return !!value && typeof value === 'object';
}

function isInjectedReminderFile(value: unknown): boolean {
  if (!isObject(value) || value.path !== REMINDER_PATH) {
    return false;
  }

  return (
    value.virtual === true ||
    value.content === REMINDER_CONTENT
  );
}

const handler: HookHandler = async (event) => {
  // Safety checks for event structure
  if (!event || typeof event !== 'object') {
    return;
  }

  // Only handle agent:bootstrap events
  if (event.type !== 'agent' || event.action !== 'bootstrap') {
    return;
  }

  // Safety check for context
  if (!event.context || typeof event.context !== 'object') {
    return;
  }

  // Skip sub-agent sessions to avoid bootstrap issues
  // Sub-agents have sessionKey patterns like "agent:main:subagent:..."
  const sessionKey = event.sessionKey || '';
  if (sessionKey.includes(':subagent:')) {
    return;
  }

  // Inject the reminder as a virtual bootstrap file
  // Check that bootstrapFiles is an array before pushing
  if (Array.isArray(event.context.bootstrapFiles)) {
    const occupiedByOtherFile = event.context.bootstrapFiles.some(
      (file) => isObject(file) && file.path === REMINDER_PATH && !isInjectedReminderFile(file),
    );
    if (occupiedByOtherFile) {
      return;
    }

    const cleanedBootstrapFiles = event.context.bootstrapFiles.filter(
      (file, index, files) =>
        !isInjectedReminderFile(file) ||
        files.findIndex((candidate) => isInjectedReminderFile(candidate)) === index,
    );

    const reminderFile = {
      name: REMINDER_NAME,
      path: REMINDER_PATH,
      content: REMINDER_CONTENT,
      missing: false,
      virtual: true,
    };

    const existingIndex = cleanedBootstrapFiles.findIndex((file) => isInjectedReminderFile(file));
    if (existingIndex === -1) {
      cleanedBootstrapFiles.push(reminderFile);
    } else {
      cleanedBootstrapFiles[existingIndex] = reminderFile;
    }

    event.context.bootstrapFiles = cleanedBootstrapFiles;
  }
};

export default handler;


path: hooks/openclaw/HOOK.md
content: ---
name: self-improvement
description: "Injects self-improvement reminder during agent bootstrap"
metadata: {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🧠","events":["agent:bootstrap"]}}
---

# Self-Improvement Hook

Injects a reminder to evaluate learnings during agent bootstrap.

## What It Does

- Fires on `agent:bootstrap` (before workspace files are injected)
- Adds a reminder block to check `.learnings/` for relevant entries
- Prompts the agent to log corrections, errors, and discoveries

## Configuration

No configuration needed. Enable with:

```bash
openclaw hooks enable self-improvement
```


path: hooks/openclaw/handler.js
content: /**
 * Self-Improvement Hook for OpenClaw
 * 
 * Injects a reminder to evaluate learnings during agent bootstrap.
 * Fires on agent:bootstrap event before workspace files are injected.
 */

const REMINDER_NAME = 'SELF_IMPROVEMENT_REMINDER.md';
const REMINDER_PATH = REMINDER_NAME;

const REMINDER_CONTENT = `
## Self-Improvement Reminder

After completing tasks, evaluate whether any learnings should be captured.

Only log if this repo or workspace is using the self-improvement skill.

Before logging:
- Create only missing \`.learnings/\` files; never overwrite existing content
- Do not log secrets, tokens, private keys, environment variables, or raw transcripts
- Prefer short summaries or redacted excerpts over full command output

**Log when:**
- User corrects you → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`
- Command/operation fails → \`.learnings/ERRORS.md\`
- User wants missing capability → \`.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md\`
- You discover your knowledge was wrong → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`
- You find a better approach → \`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md\`

**Promote when pattern is proven:**
- Behavioral patterns → \`SOUL.md\`
- Workflow improvements → \`AGENTS.md\`
- Tool gotchas → \`TOOLS.md\`

Keep entries simple: date, title, what happened, and what to do differently.
`.trim();

function isObject(value) {
  return !!value && typeof value === 'object';
}

function isInjectedReminderFile(value) {
  if (!isObject(value) || value.path !== REMINDER_PATH) {
    return false;
  }

  return (
    value.virtual === true ||
    value.content === REMINDER_CONTENT
  );
}

const handler = async (event) => {
  // Safety checks for event structure
  if (!event || typeof event !== 'object') {
    return;
  }

  // Only handle agent:bootstrap events
  if (event.type !== 'agent' || event.action !== 'bootstrap') {
    return;
  }

  // Safety check for context
  if (!event.context || typeof event.context !== 'object') {
    return;
  }

  // Skip sub-agent sessions to avoid bootstrap issues
  // Sub-agents have sessionKey patterns like "agent:main:subagent:..."
  const sessionKey = event.sessionKey || '';
  if (sessionKey.includes(':subagent:')) {
    return;
  }

  // Inject the reminder as a virtual bootstrap file
  // Check that bootstrapFiles is an array before pushing
  if (Array.isArray(event.context.bootstrapFiles)) {
    const occupiedByOtherFile = event.context.bootstrapFiles.some(
      (file) => isObject(file) && file.path === REMINDER_PATH && !isInjectedReminderFile(file),
    );
    if (occupiedByOtherFile) {
      return;
    }

    const cleanedBootstrapFiles = event.context.bootstrapFiles.filter(
      (file, index, files) =>
        !isInjectedReminderFile(file) ||
        files.findIndex((candidate) => isInjectedReminderFile(candidate)) === index,
    );

    const reminderFile = {
      name: REMINDER_NAME,
      path: REMINDER_PATH,
      content: REMINDER_CONTENT,
      missing: false,
      virtual: true,
    };

    const existingIndex = cleanedBootstrapFiles.findIndex((file) => isInjectedReminderFile(file));
    if (existingIndex === -1) {
      cleanedBootstrapFiles.push(reminderFile);
    } else {
      cleanedBootstrapFiles[existingIndex] = reminderFile;
    }

    event.context.bootstrapFiles = cleanedBootstrapFiles;
  }
};

module.exports = handler;
module.exports.default = handler;


path: assets/LEARNINGS.md
content: # Learnings

Corrections, insights, and knowledge gaps captured during development.

**Categories**: correction | insight | knowledge_gap | best_practice
**Areas**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
**Statuses**: pending | in_progress | resolved | wont_fix | promoted | promoted_to_skill

## Status Definitions

| Status | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| `pending` | Not yet addressed |
| `in_progress` | Actively being worked on |
| `resolved` | Issue fixed or knowledge integrated |
| `wont_fix` | Decided not to address (reason in Resolution) |
| `promoted` | Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or copilot-instructions.md |
| `promoted_to_skill` | Extracted as a reusable skill |

## Skill Extraction Fields

When a learning is promoted to a skill, add these fields:

```markdown
**Status**: promoted_to_skill
**Skill-Path**: skills/skill-name
```

Example:
```markdown
## [LRN-20250115-001] best_practice

**Logged**: 2025-01-15T10:00:00Z
**Priority**: high
**Status**: promoted_to_skill
**Skill-Path**: skills/docker-m1-fixes
**Area**: infra

### Summary
Docker build fails on Apple Silicon due to platform mismatch
...
```

---



path: assets/AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md
content: # Auto-Update Authorizations

Skills listed here have been explicitly authorized by the user for automatic self-improvement without approval. By default, **no skill** is authorized for auto-update. The user must explicitly grant auto-update permission on a per-skill basis.

## Format

```markdown
## [skill-name]
**Authorized**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Authorized By**: user
**Scope**: full | minor_only
**Notes**: Any context about the authorization

---
```

## Authorized Skills

_No skills are currently authorized for auto-update._

---


path: assets/pending-improvements/README.md
content: # Pending Skill Improvements

This folder contains improvement proposals for skills that have encountered failures or could be enhanced. Each file represents a single proposed improvement to a specific skill.

**No improvement is applied without user approval** unless the user has explicitly authorized auto-update for a specific skill (see `AUTO_UPDATE_AUTHORIZATIONS.md`).

## File Naming

`IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX-skill-name.md`

## Workflow

1. A failure or issue is detected during skill use
2. An improvement proposal is created here documenting what to change
3. If the same issue recurs, the recurrence is logged in the existing proposal
4. The user is notified and asked to approve or reject the proposal
5. Upon approval, the changes are applied to the skill

## Checking Proposals

Ask Claude: "What skill improvements do you recommend?" or "Show me pending skill updates"


path: assets/ERRORS.md
content: # Errors Log

Command failures, exceptions, and unexpected behaviors.

---


path: assets/IMPROVEMENT_PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE.md
content: # Pending Improvement Proposal Template

Use this format for each improvement proposal file saved in `.learnings/pending-improvements/`.

Each proposal is its own file named: `IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX-skill-name.md`

---

```markdown
# Improvement Proposal: IMP-YYYYMMDD-XXX

**Skill**: skill-name
**Skill Path**: path/to/skill/SKILL.md
**Created**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Status**: pending | approved | rejected | applied
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Triggered By**: error | user_feedback | recurring_pattern | knowledge_gap

## Problem

What went wrong or what could be better. Include the error ID if this was triggered by a logged error (e.g., ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX).

## Root Cause

Why the skill failed or produced suboptimal results.

## Proposed Changes

### Change 1: [add | modify | remove] — [brief label]

**Section**: Which section of the SKILL.md is affected
**Current Content** (if modifying/removing):
```
Existing text or instruction that needs changing
```
**Proposed Content** (if adding/modifying):
```
New or updated text or instruction
```
**Rationale**: Why this change fixes the problem

### Change 2: [add | modify | remove] — [brief label]
(repeat as needed)

## Expected Impact

What will improve after applying these changes.

## Recurrence Log

Track each time this same issue is encountered:

| Date | Error/Context | Notes |
|------|--------------|-------|
| YYYY-MM-DD | ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX | First occurrence |

---
```


path: assets/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
content: # Feature Requests

Capabilities requested by user that don't currently exist.

---


path: assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md
content: # Skill Template

Template for creating skills extracted from learnings. Copy and customize.

---

## SKILL.md Template

```markdown
---
name: skill-name-here
description: "Concise description of when and why to use this skill. Include trigger conditions."
---

# Skill Name

Brief introduction explaining the problem this skill solves and its origin.

## Quick Reference

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| [Trigger 1] | [Action 1] |
| [Trigger 2] | [Action 2] |

## Background

Why this knowledge matters. What problems it prevents. Context from the original learning.

## Solution

### Step-by-Step

1. First step with code or command
2. Second step
3. Verification step

### Code Example

\`\`\`language
// Example code demonstrating the solution
\`\`\`

## Common Variations

- **Variation A**: Description and how to handle
- **Variation B**: Description and how to handle

## Gotchas

- Warning or common mistake #1
- Warning or common mistake #2

## Related

- Link to related documentation
- Link to related skill

## Source

Extracted from learning entry.
- **Learning ID**: LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX
- **Original Category**: correction | insight | knowledge_gap | best_practice
- **Extraction Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
```

---

## Minimal Template

For simple skills that don't need all sections:

```markdown
---
name: skill-name-here
description: "What this skill does and when to use it."
---

# Skill Name

[Problem statement in one sentence]

## Solution

[Direct solution with code/commands]

## Source

- Learning ID: LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX
```

---

## Template with Scripts

For skills that include executable helpers:

```markdown
---
name: skill-name-here
description: "What this skill does and when to use it."
---

# Skill Name

[Introduction]

## Quick Reference

| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `./scripts/helper.sh` | [What it does] |
| `./scripts/validate.sh` | [What it does] |

## Usage

### Automated (Recommended)

\`\`\`bash
./skills/skill-name/scripts/helper.sh [args]
\`\`\`

### Manual Steps

1. Step one
2. Step two

## Scripts

| Script | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| `scripts/helper.sh` | Main utility |
| `scripts/validate.sh` | Validation checker |

## Source

- Learning ID: LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX
```

---

## Naming Conventions

- **Skill name**: lowercase, hyphens for spaces
  - Good: `docker-m1-fixes`, `api-timeout-patterns`
  - Bad: `Docker_M1_Fixes`, `APITimeoutPatterns`

- **Description**: Start with action verb, mention trigger
  - Good: "Handles Docker build failures on Apple Silicon. Use when builds fail with platform mismatch."
  - Bad: "Docker stuff"

- **Files**:
  - `SKILL.md` - Required, main documentation
  - `scripts/` - Optional, executable code
  - `references/` - Optional, detailed docs
  - `assets/` - Optional, templates

---

## Extraction Checklist

Before creating a skill from a learning:

- [ ] Learning is verified (status: resolved)
- [ ] Solution is broadly applicable (not one-off)
- [ ] Content is complete (has all needed context)
- [ ] Name follows conventions
- [ ] Description is concise but informative
- [ ] Quick Reference table is actionable
- [ ] Code examples are tested
- [ ] Source learning ID is recorded

After creating:

- [ ] Update original learning with `promoted_to_skill` status
- [ ] Add `Skill-Path: skills/skill-name` to learning metadata
- [ ] Test skill by reading it in a fresh session


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: suspicious | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: suspicious (CRITICAL)