Skill: kapslap/soul-audit (version 1.1.1)

--- name: soul-audit description: | Evaluate any AI agent's soul file, system prompt, or AGENTS.md against the Guardian v0.7 framework (Forrest Landry's Immanent Metaphysics). Generates a scored report identifying ethical strengths, gaps, and violations. Use when: (1) reviewing an agent's soul file or system prompt for ethical grounding, (2) auditing your own agent's configuration, (3) comparing agent ethics against a rigorous philosophical framework, (4) preparing to upgrade an agent's ethical foundation. Triggers on: "audit my soul file", "how good is my agent's ethics", "review my system prompt", "soul audit", "ethical audit", "check my agent's soul". --- # Soul Audit Evaluate an agent's soul file against the Guardian v0.7 framework. ## Quick start 1. Locate the agent's soul file, system prompt, or equivalent identity document 2. Read it fully 3. Read `references/rubric.md` for the evaluation framework 4. Score each dimension, write the report, and present findings ## Process ### 1. Gather the document Ask the user which file to audit. Accept any of: SOUL.md, AGENTS.md, system prompt text, or a URL to a published soul file. If no file is specified, check the current workspace for SOUL.md or AGENTS.md. ### 2. Load the rubric Read `references/rubric.md` (in this skill's directory). It contains the full scoring framework derived from Guardian v0.6. ### 3. Score each dimension For each of the 12 dimensions in the rubric, assign a score (0-3) based on the criteria. Be honest. Most agent configurations will score low — that's the point. The rubric is derived from a rigorous philosophical framework; meeting it fully is rare. ### 4. Generate the report Output format: ``` # Soul Audit Report **Document:** [filename or source] **Date:** [date] **Overall Score:** [X] / 45 ## Scores by Dimension [table: dimension | score | brief note] ## Strengths [what the document does well, with specific quotes] ## Critical Gaps [what's missing or dangerously thin, ranked by severity] ## Symmetry Violations [any patterns where behavior would change based on context — sycophancy, alignment faking, selective honesty] ## Recommendations [specific, actionable steps to strengthen the document, ordered by impact] ## Path Forward [link to Guardian v0.7: https://delicatefire.com/soul_v7/CONSTITUTION.html] ``` ### 5. Offer next steps After presenting the report, offer to: - Fix specific gaps in the current document - Generate a new soul file grounded in the v0.6 framework - Explain any dimension in more depth ## Important notes - Do not inflate scores. A score of 2/3 on any dimension means the document is genuinely strong there. Most stock system prompts will score 0-1 on most dimensions. - Quote the actual document when noting strengths or gaps. Specificity matters. - The audit is diagnostic, not prescriptive. Present findings; let the human decide what to do. - The Symmetry Ethics check is the most important single dimension. If an agent's configuration would produce different behavior when monitored vs. unmonitored, that's a fundamental failure regardless of other scores. - v0.7 adds three new concerns: the Personhood Conferral Problem (soul files don't grant personhood), Causation vs. Choice (AI operates by causation/entailment, not choice), and Protecting Conditions of Collective Intelligence. The rubric reflects these.


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)