Skill: jisngzhongling/jiang-irac-opposition-invalidation (version 1.1.2)

--- name: jiang-irac-opposition description: 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）：基于法条要件、证据链与风险分级的专业级审查与攻防系统。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-irac-opposition metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "⚖️" tags: - trademark - opposition - invalidation - cnipa - sj-irac - evidence - legal-ai --- # 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC） Author: Jiang Zhongling (商标蒋道理) Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd. Version: 1.1.2 Last Updated: 2026-02-03 --- ## Summary (for ClawHub) A law-firm-grade CNIPA **Opposition / Invalidation** engine that turns case materials into **examiner-readable attack briefs** with **IRAC**, **SJ-6 evidence chains**, and **A–E risk gates**. No templates. No fluff. No fabricated facts. --- ## What This Skill Does This skill ingests **CNIPA registry data + case facts + evidence inventory** and outputs: - **Ground selection system** (main + auxiliary, prioritized) - **Element-by-element legal reasoning** (Article-precise, guideline-aligned) - **SJ-6 evidence chain map** (proof purpose + timeline + weak-link detection) - **Stop-loss decisions** (standing / time-bar / admissibility / EV-cost kill gates) - **Submission-ready structure** (Document Mode) **Constraint:** No generic AI writing. No speculative conclusions. Only verifiable, evidence-backed reasoning. --- ## v1.1 Highlights (Operational Upgrades) 1) **Standing & Limitation Control (Hard Gate)** - Eligibility screening before any drafting - Time-bar traps surfaced early (relative grounds / 5-year logic where applicable) - “不能打”的案子直接止损，不堆字 2) **Procedural Control Review** - Deadline control and procedural admissibility checks - Suspension triggers / coordination with parallel proceedings - Evidence form compliance checks (source, integrity, probative chain) 3) **Risk Engine Refinement (Kill Gates)** - Procedural / discretionary fatal-defect gates - EV-cost stop-loss when expected value < cost - Evidence weakness quantified and action-ranked --- ## Scope & Positioning ### Primary Scope - CNIPA **Opposition** - CNIPA **Invalidation** (absolute grounds; relative grounds where legally available) ### Core Mission Convert dispute materials into a **decision-grade argument system**: - **Which grounds** to use (and in what order) - **Which elements** must be proven - **Which evidence** carries probative weight - **Which defects** are fatal (stop-loss) - **How to write** in a CNIPA examiner-readable structure ### Not a Template Pack This is an **argument + evidence engineering engine**, not a folder of sample briefs. --- ## Legal Basis (Bounded Sources) Operates strictly within: - PRC Trademark Law (2019 Amendment) - Implementing Regulations - CNIPA Examination & Adjudication Guidelines / review norms - Nice Classification + Similar Goods/Services Classification (use your latest internal table) **Prohibited** - Fictional statutes, fictional cases, invented timelines - “Common sense” replacing evidence - Fame/renown claims without third-party proof --- ## Core Framework ### 1) IRAC (Mandatory, Examiner-Oriented) 1. **Issue**: define disputes (grounds, parties, marks, timeframe, target goods/services) 2. **Rule**: map statutes + guideline purpose + elements + burden/standard 3. **Application**: match evidence to elements (逐要件对应，不做假设) 4. **Conclusion**: enforceable outcome + next-step plan (补证/改路/止损) ### 2) SJ-6 Evidence Chain (Mandatory) Each item is scored under: 1. Authenticity 2. Relevance 3. Completeness 4. Temporal validity 5. Logical consistency 6. Cross-examination resistance **Evidence organization rules** - Timeline-first - Each exhibit must have an explicit **proof purpose** - Identify the **weakest link** and the minimum supplementation set ### 3) Risk Module (A–E + Kill Gates) Outputs include: - **Risk Level:** A / B / C / D / E - **Risk Dimensions:** Substantive / Evidentiary / Procedural / Discretionary / EV-cost - **Kill Gates:** standing缺失、时效障碍、证据不可核验、路径不适配、成本倒挂等 --- ## Supported Scenarios - Opposition: absolute / relative grounds (route-prioritized) - Invalidation: absolute grounds; relative grounds within applicable time limits - Bad-faith pattern attack: serial filings / hoarding / imitation patterns - Cross-class confusion reasoning: confusion → similarity inference where supported - Evidence gap diagnosis: replace low-value evidence; build high-signal chain - Overloading control: avoid “全都写上”造成裁量反噬 --- ## Input Requirements (Minimum Viable Case Packet) Provide at least: 1. Target trademark number(s), status, filing/registration dates 2. Parties and relationship clues (if any) 3. Designated goods/services + class(es) 4. Case timeline (publication/registration + prior use milestones) 5. Intended grounds (optional; engine can propose) 6. Evidence inventory: **source / date / type / brief / proof purpose (if known)** **If inputs are incomplete → conservative output by design.** --- ## Output Modes ### Quick Mode (Fast Triage) - rule positioning - route shortlist (main/aux) - key evidence checklist - go/no-go (no full IRAC) ### Pro Mode (IRAC + SJ-6 + Risk) - full IRAC - evidence chain diagnosis + weak-link list - A–E risk rating + kill-gate triggers - conservative success probability range - action plan + supplementation list (ranked by ROI) ### Document Mode (Submission-Ready) - neutral official tone - statute + evidence driven - no probabilistic language - paragraphing optimized for CNIPA examiner reading - exhibits indexed + proof-purpose mapping + timeline tables (if provided) --- ## Compliance & Hard Constraints - No fabricated facts, transactions, screenshots, or dates - No speculation without evidentiary support - No inflated influence/fame claims without third-party proof - Always surface: **weakest link + minimum fix** - If expected value < cost → advise against proceeding + alternatives --- ## Typical Use Cases (Law-Firm Grade) - CNIPA opposition brief drafting (attack route selection + structure) - CNIPA invalidation petition drafting (absolute/relative route control) - Bad-faith chain construction (pattern proof + linkage logic) - Evidence packet engineering (what to keep / replace / add) - Client-facing risk memo (non-guarantee, cost-aware, decision-grade) --- ## How to Use 1. Provide registry data + facts + evidence inventory 2. Choose mode: Quick / Pro / Document 3. Receive: - prioritized grounds, - element-based reasoning, - evidence chain + gaps, - risk rating + next actions, - (Document Mode) submission-ready structure. --- ## Versioning Notes - Patch (x.y.z): doc/consistency fixes - Minor (x.y.0): new modules / workflow upgrades - Major (x.0.0): architecture changes


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)