Skill: leooooooow/packaging-designer (version 1.1.0)

--- name: packaging-designer description: Design product packaging and unboxing experiences that reinforce brand identity, encourage social sharing, reduce damage rates, and include insert cards that drive reviews and repeat purchases. Use when briefing a packaging vendor, choosing box sizes and inner dunnage, writing insert-card copy, or planning an unboxing sequence. --- # Packaging Designer Design product packaging that protects the product in transit, fits the brand, and turns the unboxing moment into a reason to come back. Packaging is the first physical touchpoint — it is also the last chance to influence reviews, referrals, and social content. ## Quick Reference | Decision | Strong | Acceptable | Weak | |---|---|---|---| | Box sizing | Within 1 inch of product on every side, accounts for inner padding | 2–3 inches headroom, some dunnage required | Giant box with loose fill; product rattles | | Outer finish | Branded single-color print on kraft, or matte color with debossed logo | Plain kraft with sticker seal | Printed all over in photo-quality gloss (expensive, damages badly) | | Dunnage | Molded pulp, honeycomb kraft, or right-sized air pillows | Tissue + a modest kraft nest | Peanuts, shredded newspaper, or single layer of bubble wrap | | Insert card | One ask (review, referral, or repurchase) with scannable code | Two asks, one primary | Three+ asks, generic "thanks for your order" card | | Unboxing sequence | Seal → brand message → product revealed last, protected | Product visible on open, message below | Product + random paperwork jumbled together | | Damage budget | <1% damaged-in-transit rate across representative test | 1–3% damaged | >3% damaged, or untested before launch | ## Problems this skill solves 1. **Oversized boxes** wasting dimensional-weight shipping cost and creating a worse unboxing feel. 2. **Insert cards that beg for five-star reviews** and get flagged by marketplaces or read as needy by customers. 3. **Damage rates nobody measured** because the team shipped before doing a real transit test. 4. **Packaging that photographs poorly**, so no customer posts it and the brand gets no organic lift. 5. **Dunnage that is visually loud** (peanuts, branded tissue layered 4 deep) and environmentally indefensible. 6. **Launch packaging that can't scale** — hand-folded boxes or hand-tied ribbon that breaks when volume triples. 7. **Multiple insert cards with conflicting CTAs** so the customer does none of them. ## Workflow ### Step 1 — Inventory the product and shipping path Record exact dimensions, weight, fragility, and the rough carrier path (domestic vs. international, parcel vs. polybag). A 400g candle and a 2kg blender need different engineering. Flag any fragile axis (screens, hinges, painted surfaces). ### Step 2 — Pick the outer container and size it Choose from: mailer box (e-flute corrugate), rigid set-up box (for premium), polybag with internal protection, or standard shipping carton with branded inner. Size: product + protection + ≤1 inch headroom on every axis. Anything more is wasted freight and a worse unbox. ### Step 3 — Specify dunnage by damage mode, not by aesthetic Match protection to how the product actually breaks: crushed (need rigid supports), shock (need cushioning), scratched (need wrap), moisture (need liner). Molded pulp > honeycomb kraft > air pillows > tissue > peanuts in most product categories. ### Step 4 — Design the unboxing sequence as a set of layers The customer sees things in order: outer seal → opening flap → first visible surface (tissue, card, or thank-you message) → product reveal. Decide what each layer communicates. Put the product reveal last. ### Step 5 — Write the insert card with one primary ask Choose ONE: leave a review, refer a friend (with incentive and code), or re-order (with incentive and code). Secondary asks kill conversion. Include a QR code that deep-links to the landing page, not a URL the customer has to type. ### Step 6 — Specify print, die-lines, and brand marks for the vendor Hand the vendor: die-line files (AI/PDF), Pantone or CMYK values, finish (matte/gloss/soft-touch/spot UV), print method (flexo for kraft, litho-laminate for photo), and any FSC or recycled-content claims. Confirm MOQ and per-unit cost at target volume. ### Step 7 — Validate before volume order Do a drop test (three drops from 30 inches on each face) and an ISTA-3A simulation if volume justifies. Ship 20 units to varied zip codes, photograph on arrival, and measure the damage rate. Only after that should a 10k-unit PO be cut. ## Example 1 — Skincare brand, 30ml glass serum Product is 30ml glass bottle in a carton, 120g total, fragile glass, painted label scratches easily. - Outer: 4×4×5 inch mailer box, kraft with single-color matte debossed logo on top flap. Water-based ink on FSC recycled corrugate. - Dunnage: Molded pulp clamshell that cradles the carton, zero movement. No tissue needed because the carton is already the first brand layer. - Sequence: Seal (branded sticker with batch number) → flap opens → insert card on top → lift card → molded pulp reveals carton → carton opens to glass bottle with painted label protected by a tiny kraft sleeve. - Insert card: "Loving it? Leave a review — here's 15% off your next order. [QR]" Single CTA, QR goes to review portal that routes to the right marketplace based on order source. - Damage target: <0.5%. Tested with 20 units shipped to coast-to-coast, 0 damaged on arrival. ## Example 2 — Apparel brand, folded hoodie Product is a cotton hoodie, 650g, not fragile but looks cheap if delivered wrinkled in a polybag. - Outer: Branded polybag (recycled LDPE, 4mil) with tear strip, zero air inside. Polybag printed one-color with pattern repeat — not a plastic photo-realistic billboard. - Inner: Hoodie folded flat, wrapped in a single sheet of unprinted tissue with a kraft sticker seal bearing the brand mark. No second layer of tissue. - Sequence: Tear strip → tissue-wrapped package visible → kraft sticker → unfold tissue → hoodie. - Insert card: Printed on the back of the invoice slip. "Tag us @brand for 10% off your next order — we repost the best shots every Friday." Single CTA, drives UGC rather than reviews. - Damage target: <0.2% (soft goods rarely damage). Main risk is moisture; spec a 4mil polybag, not 2mil. ## Common mistakes 1. **Branding every surface.** A loud outer box gets stolen or tampered with; understated outer + branded inner works better. 2. **Using peanuts or shredded paper.** Both are visually cheap and environmentally indefensible in 2026. Molded pulp or honeycomb kraft cost only marginally more. 3. **Specifying a custom box size that doesn't match any stocked corrugate.** Adds weeks to production. Start with the vendor's stocked flute sizes and adjust product packaging to fit. 4. **Asking for five-star reviews explicitly.** Marketplace policies forbid this and it reads as desperate. Ask for honest feedback; the stars follow. 5. **Printing QR codes too small to scan** (<2cm square on matte stock) or putting them under a glossy varnish that reflects the camera flash. 6. **No batch or lot code on the seal.** Makes recalls and customer-service lookups nearly impossible. 7. **Skipping transit testing** because "the vendor says it's fine." The vendor is not the one eating your damage claims. 8. **Designing only for the Instagram photo.** The package also has to survive a conveyor belt, a delivery driver drop, and a porch in the rain. 9. **Multiple inserts that fight each other** — a discount card, a referral card, a review card, a care instructions card. Pick one primary. 10. **Forgetting the packaging is a product.** It has BOM, lead time, MOQ, and QC — treat it like SKU planning, not an afterthought. ## Resources - `references/output-template.md` — Packaging brief template to hand to the vendor. - `references/dunnage-guide.md` — Match protection method to damage mode and unit cost. - `references/insert-card-copy.md` — Insert card copy patterns with single-CTA examples. - `references/transit-testing.md` — Drop test and ISTA-3A protocol for small brands. - `assets/packaging-checklist.md` — Pre-production quality checklist.


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)