Skill: leooooooow/sustainability-messaging (version 1.1.0)

--- name: Sustainability Messaging description: Craft authentic, compliant sustainability messaging for e-commerce brands including environmental claims, eco-friendly positioning, greenwashing avoidance, certification guidance, and customer communication strategies that build trust without legal risk. --- # Sustainability Messaging Create sustainability messaging that's authentic, legally compliant, and commercially effective. This skill helps e-commerce brands communicate their environmental and social efforts without falling into greenwashing traps, while building genuine customer trust and driving purchase decisions. ## Quick Reference | Decision | Strong | Acceptable | Weak | |---|---|---|---| | **Claims specificity** | Quantified, verifiable ("30% recycled content, certified by GRS") | Specific but unquantified ("made with recycled materials") | Vague ("eco-friendly," "green," "sustainable") | | **Evidence backing** | Third-party certification + published data | Internal data with methodology disclosed | No supporting evidence | | **Scope clarity** | Claim clearly states what it covers ("packaging is 100% recyclable") | General scope ("we use recyclable materials") | Implies more than what's true ("we're sustainable") | | **Certification use** | Legitimate certifications correctly displayed with license | Certification pending, disclosed as such | Fake or expired certifications, or misleading logos | | **Lifecycle coverage** | Full lifecycle assessed (sourcing → production → use → disposal) | Key stages addressed | Only one stage mentioned, implying full lifecycle | | **Transparency** | Tradeoffs and limitations openly acknowledged | Limitations acknowledged when asked | Only positive aspects highlighted | ## Solves 1. **Greenwashing liability** — FTC Green Guides violations can result in enforcement actions, fines, and consumer lawsuits 2. **Vague claims** — Terms like "eco-friendly" and "natural" without substantiation that erode consumer trust 3. **Certification confusion** — Not knowing which certifications are credible or how to properly display them 4. **Competitor pressure** — Feeling forced to make sustainability claims without genuine backing 5. **Customer skepticism** — 88% of consumers want brands to help them be more sustainable, but 45% don't trust sustainability claims 6. **Regulatory complexity** — Evolving regulations (FTC Green Guides, EU Green Claims Directive) with unclear compliance requirements 7. **Messaging inconsistency** — Different sustainability claims across channels creating confusion and compliance risk ## Workflow ### Step 1: Audit Your Actual Sustainability Practices Before writing any messaging, document what you actually do: **Product level**: | Factor | Current Practice | Evidence | Verifiable? | |---|---|---|---| | Materials | [e.g., 30% recycled polyester] | [Supplier certificate] | [Yes/No] | | Manufacturing | [e.g., Solar-powered factory] | [Energy audit report] | [Yes/No] | | Packaging | [e.g., FSC-certified cardboard] | [FSC chain of custody cert] | [Yes/No] | | Shipping | [e.g., Carbon-neutral via offsets] | [Offset provider certificate] | [Yes/No] | | End of life | [e.g., Compostable packaging] | [BPI certification] | [Yes/No] | **Business level**: | Factor | Current Practice | Evidence | Verifiable? | |---|---|---|---| | Energy | [e.g., 100% renewable office energy] | [Utility records / RECs] | [Yes/No] | | Waste | [e.g., Zero-waste-to-landfill warehouse] | [Waste audit report] | [Yes/No] | | Social | [e.g., Living wage for all workers] | [Payroll records / audit] | [Yes/No] | | Giving | [e.g., 1% of revenue to ocean cleanup] | [Donation receipts] | [Yes/No] | | Carbon | [e.g., Carbon neutral since 2023] | [Third-party verification] | [Yes/No] | ### Step 2: Understand Regulatory Requirements **FTC Green Guides (US)** — Key principles: 1. Claims must be truthful and substantiated 2. Claims must be specific, not vague 3. Qualifications must be clear and prominent 4. Don't overstate environmental benefits 5. Comparative claims must be substantiated and specific **Specific claim requirements**: | Claim | FTC Requirement | |---|---| | "Recyclable" | Must be recyclable in a substantial majority (60%+) of communities where sold | | "Biodegradable" | Must completely decompose within one year after disposal | | "Compostable" | Must decompose in a composting facility at the same rate as other compostable materials | | "Carbon neutral" | Must disclose what's included (product, shipping, operations) and offset methodology | | "Made with recycled content" | Must specify percentage and whether pre- or post-consumer | | "Non-toxic" | Must be substantiated by testing for the product's intended and foreseeable uses | | "Organic" | Must meet USDA or equivalent organic certification requirements | **EU Green Claims Directive** (upcoming): - All environmental claims must be substantiated by scientific evidence - Claims must cover the full lifecycle or clearly state what's included - Third-party verification required before making claims - Comparison claims must be fair and based on equivalent information - Generic claims ("eco-friendly," "green," "climate-friendly") will be prohibited without proof of recognized excellent environmental performance ### Step 3: Choose Your Messaging Framework **Tier 1: Certified Claims** (strongest, lowest risk) Use when you have third-party certification. Format: "[Certification name] certified [specific claim]" Example: "FSC-certified packaging from responsibly managed forests" Example: "GOTS-certified organic cotton — grown without synthetic pesticides" **Tier 2: Quantified Claims** (strong, moderate effort) Use when you have specific data but not necessarily certification. Format: "[Specific number] [specific improvement] [compared to what]" Example: "Made with 50% post-consumer recycled plastic, reducing virgin plastic use by 120g per unit" Example: "Ships in packaging that uses 40% less material than our 2022 design" **Tier 3: Process Claims** (good, requires transparency) Use when you're taking genuine steps but can't quantify impact yet. Format: "We [specific action] by [specific method]" Example: "We offset 100% of shipping emissions through verified carbon credits with Gold Standard" Example: "We source all cotton from farms audited by the Better Cotton Initiative" **Tier 4: Aspiration Claims** (acceptable if honest about the journey) Use when you're working toward sustainability goals but aren't there yet. Format: "We're working toward [specific goal] by [specific date/method]" Example: "By 2026, we aim to transition all packaging to compostable materials. Today, 60% of our packaging is compostable." Example: "We're on a journey to reduce our carbon footprint — here's our progress so far: [link to report]" ### Step 4: Write Channel-Specific Messaging **Product page** (most scrutinized): - Lead with specific, verifiable claims - Link to certification details or sustainability page - Use callout badges only for certified claims - Avoid cluttering with too many claims — pick 2-3 strongest **Packaging**: - Include disposal instructions ("Recycle this box with cardboard recycling") - Display certification logos correctly (correct size, placement per license) - Use material identification codes (recycling triangle with resin code) - Keep claims factual and brief **Email marketing**: - Share progress stories, not just claims - Link to detailed sustainability page - Use real data and milestones - Show the humans behind the initiatives **Social media**: - Behind-the-scenes content showing real practices - Progress updates with specific numbers - Customer-generated content about product end-of-life - Avoid buzzwords in captions — be specific and conversational **About/Sustainability page**: - Comprehensive overview of all sustainability efforts - Specific data and timelines - Honest about what you're NOT doing yet - Updated at least quarterly ### Step 5: Validate Claims Before publishing any sustainability claim, run it through this validation: 1. **Specificity test**: Can you replace any vague word with a specific number or fact? If yes, do it. 2. **Evidence test**: Can you point to a document, certificate, or data set that supports this claim? If not, don't make the claim. 3. **Scope test**: Does the claim clearly communicate what it covers and what it doesn't? If someone could reasonably misunderstand the scope, clarify it. 4. **Comparison test**: If comparing to a previous version or competitor, is the comparison fair, specific, and substantiated? 5. **Consumer test**: Would a reasonable consumer understand this claim the same way you intend it? Test with 5 people outside your team. ### Step 6: Build a Sustainability Content Calendar **Monthly cadence**: - Week 1: Progress update on a specific initiative (with numbers) - Week 2: Behind-the-scenes content (supply chain, manufacturing, packaging) - Week 3: Customer story or UGC related to sustainability - Week 4: Educational content (how to recycle product, care to extend life) **Quarterly**: - Sustainability progress report (even a simple one) - Certification updates or new certifications achieved - Goal progress check-in (public accountability) ### Step 7: Monitor and Update **Ongoing monitoring**: - Track regulatory changes (FTC, EU Green Claims Directive) - Monitor competitor claims (stay competitive but don't copy unsubstantiated claims) - Track customer questions/complaints about sustainability claims - Update claims when practices change (better or worse) **Annual review**: - Full audit of all published sustainability claims across all channels - Verify all certifications are current and correctly displayed - Update sustainability page with latest data - Review and update messaging framework for any new initiatives ## Example 1: Apparel Brand — Transitioning to Sustainable Materials **Scenario**: DTC clothing brand transitioning from conventional cotton to organic cotton and recycled polyester. Currently 40% of products use sustainable materials. Goal: 100% by 2027. **Audit findings**: - 40% of products use GOTS-certified organic cotton or GRS-certified recycled polyester - Packaging: 100% recycled cardboard (FSC-certified), plastic poly mailers (not yet recyclable) - Shipping: No carbon offset program yet - Factory: Fair Trade certified for 2 of 5 supplier factories **Messaging by tier**: Product pages (sustainable products only): > "Made with GOTS-certified organic cotton — grown without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers. Our organic cotton uses 91% less water than conventional cotton farming (source: Textile Exchange)." Product pages (conventional products): > No sustainability claim. Don't imply the brand is fully sustainable. Sustainability page: > "We're on a journey to make all our products from certified sustainable materials. Today, 40% of our collection uses GOTS-certified organic cotton or GRS-certified recycled polyester. Our goal is 100% by 2027. Here's where we are and where we're going: [detailed progress]" > "What we're still working on: Our poly mailers aren't yet recyclable. We're testing compostable alternatives and expect to transition by Q2 2026. Two of our five supplier factories are Fair Trade certified — we're working with the remaining three toward certification by 2028." **What they avoided**: - Didn't call the brand "sustainable" (only 40% of products qualify) - Didn't hide the poly mailer issue - Didn't use "eco-friendly" anywhere - Gave specific numbers, dates, and certifications ## Example 2: Skincare Brand — Carbon Neutral Claim **Scenario**: Skincare brand wanting to claim "carbon neutral" for their products. **Audit findings**: - Product carbon footprint calculated by third party: 2.3 kg CO2e per unit (ingredients, manufacturing, packaging, outbound shipping) - Offsets purchased: Gold Standard verified offsets at $15/tonne - Scope 1 & 2 emissions (office, warehouse): Covered by 100% renewable energy - Scope 3 emissions (customer use, end-of-life): NOT included in carbon neutral claim **Compliant messaging**: > "Carbon neutral product — from ingredients to your doorstep. We measure the carbon footprint of every product (2.3 kg CO2e per unit, verified by [Third Party]) and offset 100% through Gold Standard certified projects. This covers ingredients, manufacturing, packaging, and shipping. Customer use and end-of-life disposal are not yet included — we're working on lifecycle solutions." **What they avoided**: - Didn't claim the company is carbon neutral (only the product's cradle-to-gate footprint) - Clearly stated what's included and what isn't - Named the offset standard and verification body - Gave the specific CO2e number ## Common Mistakes 1. **Using "eco-friendly" without qualification** — This is the most common greenwashing trap. "Eco-friendly" is vague and implies broad environmental benefit. Replace with specific claims: "made with 50% recycled content" or "packaging is 100% curbside recyclable." 2. **Claiming "biodegradable" for products that won't biodegrade in practice** — Many "biodegradable" products only decompose in industrial composting facilities, not landfills. If it won't biodegrade in a landfill within a year, don't call it biodegradable without qualification. 3. **Displaying expired or inapplicable certifications** — Certifications have expiration dates and scope limitations. Using an expired cert or applying a cert to products it doesn't cover is both misleading and potentially illegal. 4. **Implying the whole product is sustainable when only part is** — "Made with recycled materials" when only the label is recycled is misleading. Specify what part and what percentage. 5. **Hiding tradeoffs** — If your sustainable alternative has downsides (higher price, different performance, limited colors), acknowledge them. Transparency builds more trust than perfection. 6. **Copying competitor claims without substantiation** — Just because a competitor says "sustainable" doesn't mean you can. Their claim might also be non-compliant, or they might have certifications you don't. 7. **Making absolute claims** — "100% sustainable," "zero environmental impact," and "completely green" are almost impossible to substantiate. Everything has some environmental impact. Use relative and specific claims instead. 8. **Neglecting the supply chain** — Your sustainability claim is only as strong as your weakest supply chain link. If you claim "ethically made" but can't verify conditions at sub-supplier factories, you're exposed. 9. **Using green imagery without green substance** — Leaf motifs, earth tones, nature photography, and recycling symbols create sustainability impressions even without explicit claims. Regulators consider visual impression as part of the overall claim. 10. **Set-and-forget approach** — Sustainability messaging needs regular updates as practices evolve, certifications renew, and regulations change. Review all claims quarterly. ## Resources - [Output Template](references/output-template.md) — Sustainability messaging strategy and audit template - [Certification Directory](references/certification-directory.md) — Guide to legitimate sustainability certifications - [Claim Language Guide](references/claim-language-guide.md) — Approved vs. risky claim language with alternatives - [Quality Checklist](assets/quality-checklist.md) — Messaging compliance validation checklist


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)