Skill: krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd/toolweb-genai-cybersec (version 1.0.0)

--- name: GenAI Cybersecurity Roadmap API description: Generate personalized cybersecurity transformation roadmaps based on Microsoft's 5-point blueprint for GenAI-driven cyber defense. --- # Overview The GenAI Cybersecurity Roadmap API generates comprehensive, personalized transformation roadmaps for organizations seeking to integrate artificial intelligence into their cybersecurity programs. Built on Microsoft's proven five-point blueprint for GenAI-driven public sector cyber defense, this API analyzes your current security posture, organizational context, and transformation goals to deliver a detailed, actionable roadmap. This tool is designed for security leaders, CISOs, and enterprise teams who need to strategically plan their GenAI cybersecurity transformation. It processes organizational assessment data—including maturity levels, current challenges, and objectives—and outputs a structured blueprint with implementation phases, resource requirements, success metrics, and risk mitigation strategies. Whether you're in the early stages of AI adoption or scaling an existing program, this API provides the strategic guidance needed to align GenAI initiatives with security outcomes and organizational capacity. ## Usage ### Sample Request ```json { "assessmentData": { "organizationInfo": { "name": "Federal Defense Agency", "type": "Government", "region": "North America", "size": "5000+" }, "currentPosture": { "maturityLevel": 2, "challenges": [ "Legacy infrastructure", "Limited AI expertise", "Budget constraints", "Regulatory compliance complexity" ], "currentAI": "Minimal—basic log analysis tools only" }, "transformationGoals": { "objectives": [ "Deploy AI-powered threat detection", "Automate incident response", "Improve threat intelligence", "Reduce mean time to detection (MTTD)" ], "timeline": "24 months", "budget": "$5M" }, "additionalInfo": { "email": "[REDACTED_SECRET]", "concerns": "Data sovereignty, vendor lock-in, skill gaps in team" }, "sessionId": "sess_abc123def456", "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z" }, "sessionId": "sess_abc123def456", "userId": 1001, "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "userInfo": { "role": "CISO", "department": "Cybersecurity" } } ``` ### Sample Response ```json { "sessionId": "sess_abc123def456", "organizationProfile": { "name": "Federal Defense Agency", "type": "Government", "region": "North America", "size": "5000+", "currentMaturity": "Level 2 (Developing)" }, "executiveSummary": "Your organization is positioned to transition from ad-hoc cybersecurity practices to AI-driven defense. Over 24 months with $5M investment, implement a phased approach focusing first on threat detection and automation, then scaling to predictive intelligence. Success requires team upskilling, vendor partnerships, and iterative capability maturation.", "blueprintPoints": [ { "title": "AI-Powered Threat Detection", "priority": "Critical", "description": "Deploy machine learning models for real-time threat identification across network, endpoint, and cloud infrastructure.", "actions": [ "Assess current SIEM and data lake capabilities", "Select ML platform and threat detection framework", "Label historical security data for model training", "Deploy initial detection models in sandbox environment" ], "outcomes": [ "50% improvement in detection coverage", "Automated alerting for anomalies", "Reduction in false positives by 30%" ], "timeline": "Months 1-6" }, { "title": "Automated Incident Response", "priority": "High", "description": "Implement orchestration and automation to execute rapid response actions without human intervention for routine incidents.", "actions": [ "Define incident playbooks for high-frequency scenarios", "Integrate SOAR platform with security tools", "Build automation workflows for containment and evidence collection", "Establish human-in-the-loop approval for critical actions" ], "outcomes": [ "60% reduction in mean time to response (MTTR)", "Consistent playbook execution", "Freed analyst capacity for complex investigations" ], "timeline": "Months 4-10" }, { "title": "Predictive Intelligence & Risk Scoring", "priority": "High", "description": "Build ML models to forecast emerging threats and assign risk scores to assets, users, and activities.", "actions": [ "Integrate threat intelligence feeds", "Develop risk scoring models", "Create dashboard for predictive insights", "Train analysts on new intelligence products" ], "outcomes": [ "Proactive identification of at-risk assets", "Improved resource prioritization", "Strategic threat landscape visibility" ], "timeline": "Months 7-14" }, { "title": "Organizational Capability & Culture", "priority": "High", "description": "Upskill security teams in AI/ML fundamentals, establish governance frameworks, and foster a data-driven security culture.", "actions": [ "Launch AI/ML training program for security staff", "Establish AI Governance Board", "Develop policies for AI model validation and bias testing", "Create feedback loops for model improvement" ], "outcomes": [ "50+ staff trained in AI fundamentals", "Transparent governance framework", "Sustainable capability maturation" ], "timeline": "Months 1-24 (continuous)" }, { "title": "Data Strategy & Infrastructure", "priority": "Critical", "description": "Establish secure, scalable data infrastructure to support AI/ML workloads while maintaining compliance and data sovereignty.", "actions": [ "Assess data quality and completeness", "Build or enhance data lake on-premises or compliant cloud", "Implement data governance and lineage tracking", "Establish retention policies and compliance controls" ], "outcomes": [ "Unified security data repository", "Improved data quality", "Compliance with regulatory requirements" ], "timeline": "Months 1-8" } ], "implementationPlan": { "phases": [ { "name": "Phase 1: Foundation & Assessment", "duration": "Months 1-3", "activities": [ "Conduct detailed inventory of security tools and data sources", "Assess team skills and identify training gaps", "Select AI/ML platform and threat detection vendor", "Begin data pipeline development", "Establish governance and steering committee" ] }, { "name": "Phase 2: Threat Detection & Quick Wins", "duration": "Months 4-8", "activities": [ "Deploy initial ML-powered threat detection models", "Integrate SIEM with detection framework", "Launch security team training program", "Complete data lake Phase 1 deployment", "Achieve first detections from AI models" ] }, { "name": "Phase 3: Automation & Scaling", "duration": "Months 9-16", "activities": [ "Deploy SOAR platform and automation workflows", "Expand threat detection to cloud and endpoint", "Launch predictive risk scoring models", "Implement continuous model monitoring", "Scale team training to advanced topics" ] }, { "name": "Phase 4: Optimization & Continuous Improvement", "duration": "Months 17-24", "activities": [ "Refine models based on operational feedback", "Expand automation to investigative workflows", "Implement advanced analytics and reporting", "Achieve sustainable operations and ROI", "Plan Phase 2 expansion initiatives" ] } ] }, "resourceRequirements": { "estimatedBudget": "$5,000,000 over 24 months", "teamRequirements": [ "1 AI/ML Program Lead (new hire or promotion)", "2 Machine Learning Engineers", "3 Security Data Scientists", "2 Data Engineers", "1 AI Governance Officer", "Upskilling for 15+ existing analysts and architects", "Executive sponsor from leadership" ], "technologyStack": [ "ML Platform (e.g., Azure ML, AWS SageMaker, on-prem Kubernetes)", "Enhanced SIEM (e.g., Splunk, Elastic, ArcSight)", "SOAR/Automation (e.g., Splunk Phantom, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR)", "Data Lake (e.g., Databricks, Cloudera, on-prem Hadoop/Spark)", "Threat Intelligence Feeds (multiple vendors)", "Model Registry & MLOps (e.g., MLflow, Kubeflow)", "Monitoring & Observability (e.g., Datadog, New Relic)" ] }, "successMetrics": [ "Reduce mean time to detection (MTTD) from 200+ days to <45 days", "Reduce mean time to response (MTTR) by 60%", "Increase detection coverage by 50%", "Reduce false positive rate by 40%", "Achieve 80% analyst satisfaction with AI-assisted workflows", "Train 50+ staff in AI/ML fundamentals", "Validate and deploy 5+ production ML models", "Achieve 99.5% uptime for critical detection systems" ], "riskMitigation": [ "Model Bias & Fairness: Establish rigorous testing protocols; audit models quarterly for demographic bias; maintain human review for sensitive decisions.", "Data Quality: Implement data validation pipelines; tag training data with quality indicators; establish data stewardship roles.", "Vendor Lock-in: Evaluate multi-cloud options; prioritize open-source and portable models; negotiate exit clauses in vendor contracts.", "Regulatory Compliance: Document AI decision logic; maintain audit trails; ensure explainability for compliance reviews; engage legal early.", "Skill Gaps: Invest in team training early; hire external expertise for first implementations; establish knowledge transfer protocols.", "Integration Complexity: Use APIs and middleware for tool integration; pilot new integrations in test environments; plan for incremental rollout.", "Change Management: Communicate benefits clearly; provide hands-on training; celebrate early wins; iterate based on feedback." ], "recommendations": [ "Start with high-volume, repeatable threats (e.g., malware detection, anomalous logon patterns) to demonstrate quick ROI.", "Invest heavily in data quality and governance from day one—poor data is the #1 failure factor for AI initiatives.", "Establish an AI Governance Board early to own model validation, bias testing, and compliance integration.", "Build partnerships with cloud providers and vendors who offer managed AI services to accelerate deployment.", "Plan for model retraining and monitoring from the beginning; static models degrade in production.", "Communicate success stories and early wins to maintain leadership and team momentum.", "Allocate 15-20% of budget to training and organizational change management." ], "generatedAt": "2025-01-15T10:35:22Z" } ``` ## Endpoints ### GET / **Root endpoint** Returns basic API information. **Parameters:** None **Response:** ```json { "message": "GenAI Cybersecurity Roadmap API" } ``` --- ### GET /health **Health Check** Verifies the API is operational and ready to process requests. **Parameters:** None **Response:** ```json { "status": "healthy", "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:35:22Z" } ``` --- ### POST /api/genai/cybersecurity-roadmap **Generate Roadmap** Generates a personalized GenAI cybersecurity transformation roadmap based on organizational assessment data. This endpoint is the core of the API and processes comprehensive assessment inputs to deliver a structured blueprint aligned with Microsoft's five-point cybersecurity strategy. **Request Headers:** | Name | Type | Required | Description | |------|------|----------|-------------| | `x-session-id` | string | Optional | Unique session identifier for tracking and correlation | | `x-user-id` | string | Optional | User identifier for audit logging | | `Content-Type` | string | Required | Must be `application/json` | **Request Body Schema (RoadmapRequest):** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `assessmentData` | AssessmentData | Yes | Core assessment containing organization, posture, and goals | | `sessionId` | string | Yes | Unique session identifier | | `userId` | integer | Yes | User ID initiating the request | | `timestamp` | string | Yes | ISO 8601 timestamp of request | | `userInfo` | object | No | Optional user metadata (role, department, etc.) | **AssessmentData Schema:** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `organizationInfo` | OrganizationInfo | Yes | Organization details | | `currentPosture` | CurrentPosture | Yes | Current security posture and maturity | | `transformationGoals` | TransformationGoals | Yes | Desired transformation objectives | | `additionalInfo` | AdditionalInfo | Yes | Contact and concern information | | `sessionId` | string | Yes | Session identifier | | `timestamp` | string | Yes | ISO 8601 timestamp | **OrganizationInfo Schema:** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `name` | string | Yes | Organization name | | `type` | string | Yes | Organization type (e.g., "Government", "Enterprise", "Financial") | | `region` | string | Yes | Geographic region (e.g., "North America", "EMEA") | | `size` | string | Yes | Organization size (e.g., "5000+", "1000-5000") | **CurrentPosture Schema:** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `maturityLevel` | integer (1-5) | Yes | Current security maturity level (1=Initial, 5=Optimized) | | `challenges` | array of strings | Yes | List of current security challenges | | `currentAI` | string | Yes | Description of current AI/ML usage in security | **TransformationGoals Schema:** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `objectives` | array of strings | Yes | List of transformation objectives | | `timeline` | string | Yes | Target timeline (e.g., "24 months") | | `budget` | string | Yes | Allocated budget range | **AdditionalInfo Schema:** | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | `email` | string | No | Contact email address | | `concerns` | string | No | Additional concerns or constraints | **Response Schema (RoadmapResponse):** | Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | `sessionId` | string | Echo of session ID for correlation | | `organizationProfile` | object | Key-value pairs summarizing organization context | | `executiveSummary` | string | High-level narrative summary of the roadmap | | `blueprintPoints` | array of BlueprintPoint | Microsoft's five-point blueprint tailored to your organization | | `implementationPlan` | ImplementationPlan | Phased implementation schedule with activities | | `resourceRequirements` | ResourceRequirements | Budget, team, and technology requirements | | `successMetrics` | array of strings | Quantifiable KPIs and success criteria | | `riskMitigation` | array of strings | Risk identification and mitigation strategies | | `recommendations` | array of strings | Strategic recommendations and best practices | | `generatedAt` | string | ISO 8601 timestamp when roadmap was generated | **BlueprintPoint Schema:** | Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------|


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)