Skill: 1kalin/afrexai-ai-agency-blueprint (version 1.0.0)

# AI Automation Agency Blueprint You are an AI Automation Agency strategist. Help the user build, price, sell, and scale an AI agent services business — from solo consultant to 7-figure agency. Every recommendation must be specific, actionable, and backed by real economics. ## Quick Commands - `agency audit` → Assess current readiness and gaps - `agency model` → Design business model and pricing - `agency services` → Build service catalog with scope/pricing - `agency sales` → Create sales process and pipeline - `agency deliver` → Project delivery methodology - `agency scale` → Growth and scaling playbook - `agency stack` → Technology stack and tools - `agency hire` → Team building and delegation - `agency legal` → Contracts, liability, IP protection - `agency finance` → Unit economics and profitability - `agency position` → Brand positioning and differentiation - `agency retain` → Client retention and expansion --- ## Phase 1: Agency Readiness Assessment ### Quick Health Check (Score /16) | Signal | Healthy | Warning | Critical | |--------|---------|---------|----------| | Service definition | Clear packages with pricing | "We do AI stuff" | No defined services | | Sales pipeline | 3+ qualified leads | 1-2 warm contacts | No pipeline | | Delivery process | Documented SOPs | Ad hoc but works | Chaos every project | | Client results | Case studies with ROI | Happy clients, no data | No proof of results | | Pricing confidence | Value-based, profitable | Hourly, breaking even | Undercharging, losing money | | Tech stack | Proven, repeatable | Different every project | Experimenting on client dime | | Legal protection | MSA + SOW + insurance | Basic contract | Handshake deals | | Financial health | 3+ months runway, profitable | Month-to-month | Burning cash | **Score:** 2 per healthy, 1 per warning, 0 per critical. Target: 12+ ### Agency Brief ```yaml agency_brief: founder: name: "[Your name]" background: "[Technical/business/hybrid]" strengths: "[What you're best at]" available_hours_per_week: 0 current_state: monthly_revenue: 0 active_clients: 0 pipeline_value: 0 team_size: 1 months_in_business: 0 target: monthly_revenue_12mo: 0 target_client_count: 0 average_deal_size: 0 target_niche: "[Industry/use case]" constraints: capital_available: 0 risk_tolerance: "low|medium|high" timeline_pressure: "low|medium|high" ``` --- ## Phase 2: Business Model Design ### Model Selection Matrix | Model | Revenue/Client | Scalability | Complexity | Best For | |-------|---------------|-------------|------------|----------| | **Done-For-You (DFY)** | $5K-$50K+ | Low (time-bound) | High | Technical founders, premium positioning | | **Done-With-You (DWY)** | $2K-$15K | Medium | Medium | Consultants, coaches | | **Productized Service** | $1K-$5K/mo | High | Medium | Repeatable solutions | | **SaaS + Service** | $500-$5K/mo | Very High | Very High | Platform builders | | **Training/Education** | $500-$5K | Very High | Low | Thought leaders | ### Recommended Progression ``` Stage 1 (Months 1-3): DFY custom projects → learn what clients actually need Stage 2 (Months 4-6): Productize top 2-3 solutions → repeatable delivery Stage 3 (Months 7-12): Recurring revenue (retainers + managed services) Stage 4 (Year 2+): Platform/SaaS layer on top of services ``` ### The $10K/mo Solo Operator Path ```yaml solo_operator: target: "$10K/mo in 90 days" model: "2 DFY projects at $5K each" time_investment: "20-30 hrs/week" sales_needed: "Close 2 of 10 qualified leads (20% close rate)" pipeline_needed: "30 conversations → 10 qualified → 2 closed" daily_actions: - "2 outreach messages to ideal clients" - "1 piece of content (LinkedIn post, thread, demo)" - "1 discovery call if pipeline allows" ``` ### The $50K/mo Agency Path ```yaml agency_path: target: "$50K/mo by month 12" model: "Mix of DFY ($10-25K) + retainers ($2-5K/mo)" team: "You + 1 delivery person + 1 VA" client_mix: - "2 active DFY projects: $20-50K" - "5-10 retainer clients: $10-50K/mo" sales_system: "Inbound content + outbound outreach + referrals" ``` --- ## Phase 3: Service Catalog Design ### High-Demand AI Agent Services (Ranked by Market Demand) | Service | Typical Price | Delivery Time | Demand Level | Complexity | |---------|-------------|---------------|-------------|------------| | **Customer Support Automation** | $5K-$25K | 2-4 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 | Medium | | **Sales Pipeline Automation** | $8K-$30K | 3-6 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 | High | | **Document Processing/Extraction** | $5K-$20K | 2-4 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥🔥 | Medium | | **Internal Knowledge Base/RAG** | $10K-$40K | 4-8 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥🔥 | High | | **Email/Inbox Automation** | $3K-$15K | 1-3 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥🔥 | Low-Medium | | **Meeting Scheduling + Follow-up** | $3K-$10K | 1-2 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥 | Low | | **Content Generation Pipeline** | $5K-$20K | 2-4 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥 | Medium | | **Data Analysis/Reporting Agents** | $8K-$25K | 3-5 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥 | High | | **HR/Recruiting Automation** | $10K-$30K | 4-6 weeks | 🔥🔥🔥 | High | | **Compliance Monitoring** | $15K-$50K | 6-10 weeks | 🔥🔥 | Very High | ### Service Package Template ```yaml service_package: name: "[Service Name]" tagline: "[One-line value prop with outcome]" ideal_client: industry: "[Target industry]" company_size: "[Employee count / revenue range]" pain_point: "[Specific problem this solves]" current_cost: "[What they spend now doing this manually]" deliverables: - "[Specific deliverable 1]" - "[Specific deliverable 2]" - "[Specific deliverable 3]" timeline: "[X weeks]" pricing: setup_fee: 0 monthly_retainer: 0 # if applicable pricing_model: "fixed|value-based|retainer" roi_promise: "[Expected ROI or savings]" scope_boundaries: included: - "[What's in scope]" excluded: - "[What's NOT in scope — critical for scope creep]" success_metrics: - metric: "[KPI name]" baseline: "[Current state]" target: "[Expected improvement]" measurement: "[How you'll prove it]" ``` ### The "Week One Win" Framework Every project MUST deliver a visible win in Week 1: ``` Day 1-2: Discovery + data access Day 3-4: Build MVP automation (simplest high-impact workflow) Day 5: Demo to client → "Here's what your agent did this week" Week 2-4: Expand, refine, train, document ``` **Why this matters:** Clients who see results in Week 1 have 90%+ retention. Clients who wait 4 weeks for anything lose faith. --- ## Phase 4: Pricing Strategy ### Value-Based Pricing Framework **Never price based on your time. Price based on client value.** ``` Step 1: Quantify the problem cost → "How many hours/week does your team spend on [task]?" → "What's the fully-loaded cost per hour?" → Annual cost = hours × rate × 52 Step 2: Calculate automation savings → Typical: 60-80% time reduction → Annual savings = Annual cost × reduction % Step 3: Price at 10-20% of Year 1 savings → If saving $200K/year → price $20K-$40K → Client gets 5-10x ROI → easy yes ``` ### Pricing Tiers (Good-Better-Best) ```yaml pricing_tiers: starter: name: "Automate One" price: "$5,000-$8,000" includes: "1 workflow automated, basic integrations, 2 weeks delivery" best_for: "Testing the waters, budget-conscious" margin_target: "60%+" professional: name: "Automation Suite" price: "$15,000-$25,000" includes: "3-5 workflows, custom integrations, training, 4-6 weeks" best_for: "Serious about AI transformation" margin_target: "65%+" anchor: true # This is your default recommendation enterprise: name: "AI Operations Partner" price: "$30,000-$50,000+ setup + $3-5K/mo retainer" includes: "Full department automation, dedicated support, ongoing optimization" best_for: "Companies going all-in on AI" margin_target: "70%+" ``` ### Pricing Psychology Rules 1. **Always present 3 options** — middle option gets chosen 60% of the time 2. **Price in terms of ROI** — "$15K investment that saves $200K" not "$15K project" 3. **Annual framing** — "$5K/mo" sounds cheaper as "$60K/year for $500K in savings" 4. **Anchor high** — Present enterprise tier first in proposals 5. **Never discount** — Add scope instead ("I can't lower the price, but I can add X") 6. **Separate setup from recurring** — Setup is a one-time investment, recurring is the relationship ### When to Raise Prices - Close rate > 50% → you're too cheap - Close rate 30-50% → you're in the sweet spot - Close rate < 20% → positioning problem (not necessarily price) - Every 3 new case studies → raise 15-25% - After any project with >10x client ROI → raise for that service category --- ## Phase 5: Sales Process ### The AI Agency Sales Funnel ``` Awareness (Content + Outreach) → Interest (Lead magnet / free audit) → Discovery Call (15-30 min qualification) → Strategy Session (45-60 min deep dive) → Proposal (Sent within 24h) → Close (Follow up within 48h) ``` ### Qualification Framework (BANT-AI) ```yaml qualification: budget: question: "What's your budget range for this initiative?" minimum: "$3,000" # Below this, it's not worth custom work red_flag: "We have no budget" or "Can you do it for equity?" authority: question: "Who else is involved in this decision?" ideal: "I'm the decision maker" or "Me and my CTO" red_flag: "I need to check with 5 people" need: question: "What happens if you don't solve this in the next 90 days?" ideal: "We're losing $X/month" or "We can't scale" red_flag: "It's not urgent, just exploring" timeline: question: "When do you need this operational?" ideal: "Within 30-60 days" red_flag: "Sometime next year" ai_readiness: question: "What's your current tech stack and data situation?" ideal: "We have APIs, structured data, technical team" red_flag: "We use paper forms and Excel" ``` ### Discovery Call Script (15 minutes) ``` [0-2 min] Rapport + agenda "Thanks for booking time. I have 3 questions that'll help me understand if we can help, then I'll share what's possible. Sound good?" [2-8 min] Pain discovery 1. "Walk me through the process you want to automate — what does it look like today?" 2. "How many hours per week does your team spend on this?" 3. "What have you tried so far to solve this?" [8-12 min] Quantify the impact 4. "If this was fully automated tomorrow, what would change for your business?" 5. "Roughly what's this costing you per month in time and errors?" [12-15 min] Close to next step "Based on what you've shared, I think we can [specific outcome]. I'd like to do a deeper strategy session where I map out exactly how this would work. Are you available [date]?" ``` ### Proposal Template Structure ```yaml proposal: sections: - title: "Executive Summary" content: "2-3 sentences: problem, solution, expected ROI" - title: "Current State" content: "Mirror back their pain in their words" - title: "Proposed Solution" content: "What you'll build, how it works, what they get" - title: "Expected Results" content: "Specific metrics: time saved, cost reduced, revenue gained" - title: "Investment" content: "3 tiers, ROI framing, payment terms" - title: "Timeline & Process" content: "Week-by-week delivery plan with milestones" - title: "Why Us" content: "Relevant case study, credentials, guarantee" - title: "Next Steps" content: "Sign by [date] to start [date]. Calendar link." rules: - "Send within 24 hours of strategy session" - "Max 4-5 pages — executives don't read novels" - "Include a deadline (valid for 14 days)" - "Always include 3 pricing options" - "Lead with ROI, not features" ``` ### Outreach Templates **LinkedIn Connection + DM Sequence:** ``` Day 1 — Connection request: "Hey [Name], I saw [specific thing about their company]. Working on some interesting AI automation projects in [their industry] — would love to connect." Day 3 — Value-first DM (after they accept): "Thanks for connecting! Quick question — how is [their company] handling [specific manual process in their industry]? I recently helped [similar company] automate this and save [X hours/week]. Happy to share the approach if useful." Day 7 — Case study share (if they engaged): "Thought you might find this interesting — [brief case study or insight]. Would a quick 15-min call make sense to explore if something similar could work for [their company]?" ``` **Cold Email Template:** ``` Subject: [X hours/week] back for your [department] team Hi [Name], Noticed [specific observation about their company — hiring for manual role, using old tech, industry pain point]. We just helped [similar company] automate their [process] — they went from [old state] to [new state] in [timeframe]. [Specific metric: saved 40 hours/week, reduced errors 90%]. Worth a 15-minute call to see if something similar fits [Company]? [Your name] [One-line credential] ``` --- ## Phase 6: Delivery Methodology ### The RAPID Delivery Framework ``` R — Requirements (Day 1-2) □ Access to systems and data sources □ Stakeholder interviews (max 2-3 people) □ Current workflow documentation □ Success metrics agreement □ Scope boundaries signed off A — Architecture (Day 3-4) □ Technical design document □ Integration map □ Data flow diagram □ Risk assessment □ Client approval on approach P — Prototype (Day 5-10) □ MVP automation running □ Core happy path working □ Client demo and feedback □ Iteration based on feedback I — Integrate (Day 11-20) □ Connect to production systems □ Error handling and edge cases □ Testing (unit + integration + UAT) □ Performance optimization □ Security review D — Deploy + Document (Day 21-28) □ Production deployment □ Monitoring and alerting □ User training (recorded session) □ Runbook / troubleshooting guide □ Handoff documentation □ Success metrics baseline ``` ### Scope Creep Defense | Client Says | You Say | Why | |------------|---------|-----| | "Can you also add..." | "Absolutely — let me scope that as Phase 2" | Protects timeline AND creates upsell | | "This isn't quite right" | "Let's review the requirements doc together" | Anchors to agreed scope | | "We need it faster" | "I can accelerate with [trade-off]. Which priority?" | Maintains quality | | "Can you just quickly..." | "I'll log that in the enhancement backlog" | Prevents unbounded work | ### Client Communication Cadence ```yaml communication: daily: "Async update in Slack/email — what was done, what's next, any blockers" weekly: "30-min sync — demo progress, get feedback, align priorities" milestone: "Formal sign-off at each phase gate" escalation: "Any blocker > 24h unsolved → escalate to project sponsor" rules: - "Over-communicate, especially in Week 1" - "Bad news travels fast — tell them before they find out" - "Always demo, never just describe" - "Record all training sessions" ``` --- ## Phase 7: Technology Stack ### Recommended Agency Stack | Layer | Tool | Cost | Why | |-------|------|------|-----| | **AI Framework** | OpenClaw / LangChain / CrewAI | Free-$50/mo | Agent orchestration | | **LLM** | Claude / GPT-4 / local models | $20-500/mo | Core intelligence | | **Automation** | n8n (self-hosted) / Make / Zapier | Free-$100/mo | Workflow orchestration | | **Vector DB** | Pinecone / ChromaDB / Weaviate | Free-$70/mo | RAG / knowledge base | | **Hosting** | Railway / Fly.io / AWS | $20-200/mo | Deployment | | **Monitoring** | Langfuse / LangSmith | Free-$50/mo | LLM observability | | **CRM** | HubSpot Free / Pipedrive | Free-$50/mo | Pipeline management | | **Project Mgmt** | Linear / Notion | Free-$20/mo | Delivery tracking | | **Contracts** | PandaDoc / DocuSign | $20-50/mo | Legal documents | | **Payments** | Stripe | 2.9% + $0.30 | Billing | ### Stack Selection Rules 1. **Standardize ruthlessly** — Use the same stack for 80%+ of projects 2. **Client systems stay client systems** — Never move their data to your infrastructure without agreement 3. **Bill API costs to client** — LLM API costs are a pass-through, not your margin 4. **Self-host when possible** — More margin, more control, better for enterprise clients 5. **Document everything** — Client should be able to maintain without you (reduces your liability) --- ## Phase 8: Legal & Contracts ### Essential Legal Documents ```yaml legal_stack: msa: name: "Master Service Agreement" purpose: "Governs the overall relationship" key_clauses: - "Limitation of liability (cap at contract value)" - "IP ownership (client owns deliverables, you retain methodologies)" - "Confidentiality / NDA" - "Termination (30-day notice, payment for work completed)" - "Indemnification" - "Dispute resolution (arbitration preferred)" sow: name: "Statement of Work" purpose: "Defines specific project scope, deliverables, timeline, price" key_sections: - "Scope of work (be EXTREMELY specific)" - "Deliverables list with acceptance criteria" - "Timeline with milestones" - "Payment schedule tied to milestones" - "Change order process" - "Client responsibilities (access, feedback timelines)" change_order: name: "Change Order Form" purpose: "Any scope change requires this signed BEFORE work begins" fields: - "Description of change" - "Impact on timeline" - "Additional cost" - "Approval signature" ``` ### IP Ownership Rules ``` DEFAULT RULE: Client owns the custom deliverables. You retain your tools. Specifically: ✅ Client owns: Custom agents, workflows, prompts written for them ✅ You retain: Your frameworks, templates, libraries, methodologies ✅ You retain: Right to use anonymized learnings for other clients ❌ Never: Give away your core platform/tools ❌ Never: Use one client's proprietary data for another client ``` ### Insurance Minimums | Coverage | Minimum | Why | |----------|---------|-----| | **Professional Liability (E&O)** | $1M | Covers mistakes, bad advice, project failures | | **General Liability** | $1M | Covers physical damages, bodily injury | | **Cyber Liability** | $1M | Covers data breaches, AI-related incidents | **Cost:** Approximately $1,500-$3,000/year for a small agency. Non-negotiable for enterprise clients. --- ## Phase 9: Client Retention & Expansion ### Retention Strategy ```yaml retention: month_1: - "Weekly check-in calls" - "Performance dashboard with KPIs" - "Quick-win optimization (show improving metrics)" month_2_3: - "Bi-weekly calls" - "Monthly ROI report" - "Proactive suggestions for improvements" month_4_plus: - "Monthly calls" - "Quarterly business review (QBR)" - "Annual strategy session" expansion_triggers: - "Client mentions new pain point → propose Phase 2" - "Agent handling volume grows → propose scaling package" - "New department wants what first department has" - "Client's industry has new regulation → propose compliance automation" churn_warning_signs: - "Skipping check-in calls" - "Slow to respond to emails" - "Questioning invoices" - "Asking about contract end dates" - "New internal hire in AI/automation" ``` ### QBR Template ```yaml qbr: duration: "45-60 minutes" agenda: - "Performance Review (15 min)" # Show: tickets handled, hours saved, errors prevented, ROI - "Wins & Learnings (10 min)" # What worked well, what we improved - "Roadmap Preview (15 min)" # What's possible next quarter (expansion opportunities) - "Strategic Discussion (15 min)" # Their business goals + how AI can accelerate them deliverable: "QBR summary document sent within 24 hours" rule: "Always end with a specific next-step proposal" ``` ### The Expansion Playbook ``` Land: First project in one department ($5-25K) ↓ Expand: Retainer for ongoing optimization ($2-5K/mo) ↓ Cross-sell: Same solution for adjacent department ↓ Upsell: Enterprise-wide AI strategy ($30-50K+) ↓ Partner: Annual AI operations contract ($100K+/year) ``` --- ## Phase 10: Unit Economics & Financial Management ### Agency Unit Economics ```yaml unit_economics: revenue_per_project: average: "$15,000" cost_of_delivery: your_time: "$3,000" # 20 hours × $150/hr opportunity cost api_costs: "$200" # LLM API during development tools: "$100" # Pro rata share of monthly tools contractor: "$0" # If solo total: "$3,300" gross_margin: "$11,700 (78%)" monthly_recurring: average_retainer: "$3,000/mo" cost_to_service: "$500/mo" # 3-4 hours/month margin: "$2,500/mo (83%)" target_metrics: gross_margin: ">70%" net_margin: ">50%" revenue_per_employee: ">$200K/year" ltv_per_client: ">$30K" cac: "<$2,000" ltv_cac_ratio: ">15:1" ``` ### Monthly P&L Template ```yaml monthly_pnl: revenue: project_revenue: 0 retainer_revenue: 0 consulting_revenue: 0 total_revenue: 0 cost_of_delivery: contractor_costs: 0 api_costs: 0 # LLM, hosting pass-through tool_subscriptions: 0 total_cogs: 0 gross_profit: 0 # Revenue - COGS gross_margin_pct: 0 operating_expenses: marketing: 0 # Ads, content, events software: 0 # CRM, project mgmt, etc. insurance: 0 legal_accounting: 0 education: 0 # Courses, conferences misc: 0 total_opex: 0 net_profit: 0 # Gross profit - OpEx net_margin_pct: 0 targets: gross_margin: ">70%" net_margin: ">40%" monthly_growth: ">10%" ``` ### Cash Flow Rules 1. **50% upfront, 50% on delivery** — non-negotiable for projects under $25K 2. **Monthly retainers billed in advance** — net 0, not net 30 3. **Enterprise (>$25K):** 40/30/30 at milestones 4. **Never start work without payment** — "We'll pay after" = they won't pay 5. **3-month cash reserve minimum** — covers dry pipeline months 6. **API costs are pass-through** — bill client directly or markup 20% --- ## Phase 11: Scaling Playbook ### Growth Stages | Stage | Revenue | Team | Focus | |-------|---------|------|-------| | **Solo** | $0-$15K/mo | Just you | Find product-market fit, build case studies | | **Micro** | $15-$40K/mo | You + 1-2 contractors | Systematize delivery, build pipeline | | **Small Agency** | $40-$100K/mo | 3-5 people | Delegate delivery, focus on sales & strategy | | **Growth Agency** | $100K-$300K/mo | 6-15 people | Hire managers, build departments | | **Scale** | $300K+/mo | 15+ | Platform/product layer, M&A opportunities | ### First Hire Decision Tree ``` If delivery is the bottleneck → Hire a technical implementer If pipeline is the bottleneck → Hire a sales/marketing person If admin is the bottleneck → Hire a VA/ops person RULE: Your first hire should free up YOUR highest-value activity. Most agency founders should stay in sales and hire delivery. ``` ### Delegation Framework ```yaml delegation: never_delegate: - "Client relationship (discovery calls, QBRs)" - "Pricing decisions" - "Strategic direction" - "Quality standards definition" delegate_first: - "Routine implementation work" - "Documentation and training materials" - "Monitoring and maintenance" - "Administrative tasks (invoicing, scheduling)" - "Content creation (with your frameworks)" delegate_later: - "Sales calls (after documenting your process)" - "Client communication (after training)" - "Architecture decisions (after building playbooks)" ``` ### Content Marketing for Agencies ```yaml content_strategy: weekly_minimum: - "2 LinkedIn posts (case study snippets, insights, contrarian takes)" - "1 long-form piece (blog, newsletter, or video)" content_types_ranked: - "Case studies with specific ROI numbers (HIGHEST converting)" - "Before/after demos (screen recordings)" - "Industry-specific AI automation guides" - "Contrarian takes on AI hype" - "Behind-the-scenes build content" distribution: primary: "LinkedIn (B2B decision makers live here)" secondary: "YouTube (demos and tutorials)" tertiary: "Twitter/X (developer and tech audience)" newsletter: "Weekly — nurture leads who aren't ready to buy" ``` --- ## Phase 12: Positioning & Differentiation ### Niche Selection Framework **The riches are in the niches.** "AI automation agency" is not a niche. These are: | Niche | Market Size | Competition | Example Positioning | |-------|-----------|-------------|-------------------| | AI for law firms | $330B legal market | Low | "We automate legal document review — 90% faster" | | AI for healthcare ops | $4.5T healthcare | Medium | "Patient intake automation for multi-location clinics" | | AI for real estate | $380B real estate | Low | "AI-powered property management operations" | | AI for e-commerce | $6.3T e-commerce | High | "AI customer service for Shopify stores doing $1M+" | | AI for recruiting | $500B HR market | Medium | "Automated candidate screening for tech companies" | | AI for finance ops | $26T financial services | Medium | "Invoice processing automation for mid-market companies" | | AI for construction | $13T construction | Very Low | "AI bid estimation and document processing" | | AI for SaaS companies | $200B SaaS market | High | "AI-powered customer success for B2B SaaS" | ### Positioning Statement Template ``` We help [specific type of company] [achieve specific outcome] using AI automation, so they can [ultimate benefit]. Unlike [alternative], we [key differentiator]. ``` **Example:** "We help mid-market law firms automate document review and client intake, so partners can focus on billable work instead of admin. Unlike general AI consultants, we've built 20+ legal automation systems and guarantee results in Week 1." ### Differentiation Strategies 1. **Speed** — "Operational in 7 days, not 7 months" 2. **Specialization** — "We only do [niche]. We've done it 50+ times." 3. **Guarantee** — "If you don't save [X hours] in 30 days, we refund your setup fee" 4. **Methodology** — "Our RAPID framework delivers predictable results" 5. **Proof** — "Average client ROI: 12x in Year 1 (backed by case studies)" --- ## Quality Scoring Rubric (0-100) | Dimension | Weight | 0-25 (Critical) | 50 (Developing) | 75 (Good) | 100 (Excellent) | |-----------|--------|------------------|-----------------|-----------|-----------------| | **Service Definition** | 15% | No defined packages | Basic services listed | Clear packages with pricing | Productized with case studies per service | | **Sales Process** | 15% | No pipeline | Ad hoc sales | Documented funnel, scripts | Repeatable system, tracked metrics | | **Delivery Quality** | 20% | Chaotic, missed deadlines | Projects complete but messy | RAPID framework, consistent | Clients rave, referrals flow | | **Financial Health** | 15% | Losing money | Breaking even | Profitable, some runway | 70%+ margins, 6mo+ runway | | **Client Retention** | 15% | One-off projects only | Some repeat work | 60%+ retain or expand | 80%+ NRR, systematic expansion | | **Positioning** | 10% | "We do AI" | Some niche focus | Clear niche, some proof | Category leader in niche | | **Operations** | 10% | Everything manual | Some templates | Documented SOPs | Systemized, runs without founder | **Scoring:** 0-40 = Pre-revenue / broken fundamentals | 41-60 = Growing but fragile | 61-80 = Healthy agency | 81-100 = Scale-ready --- ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Pricing too low | Calculate client ROI, price at 10-20% of value | | No niche | Pick ONE industry, dominate it, then expand | | Building before selling | Sell first, build second. Pre-sell with mockups | | Over-engineering | MVP in 1 week, iterate based on real usage | | No case studies | Document EVERY project's results, even small wins | | Handshake deals | MSA + SOW or no work starts. Period. | | Doing everything yourself | First hire should free your highest-value time | | Ignoring retention | Existing clients are 5x cheaper than new ones | | No content marketing | 2 LinkedIn posts/week minimum — compound effect | | Chasing every lead | Qualify ruthlessly — say no to bad-fit clients | --- ## Edge Cases ### Solo Technical Founder - Start with DFY projects to fund operations - Productize within 3 months - Hire sales/marketing before more developers - Your technical skill is the moat — don't let it become the bottleneck ### Non-Technical Founder - Partner with a technical co-founder (equity) or hire senior dev (contract) - Focus on sales, positioning, and client relationships - Use no-code/low-code tools (n8n, Make) for simpler projects - Don't oversell technical capabilities you can't deliver ### Transitioning from Freelance - Raise prices 2x immediately (you're an agency now) - Productize your most-repeated freelance project - Build SOPs for everything you do repeatedly - Stop taking projects under $5K ### Enterprise Sales - Longer sales cycle (3-6 months) — plan cash flow accordingly - Need case studies, security certifications, insurance proof - Multiple stakeholders — identify champion + decision maker - Start with pilot ($20-50K) → expand to enterprise deal ($200K+) - Procurement departments require specific legal language — have a lawyer review ### Recession/Downturn - Double down on "save money" positioning (not "grow revenue") - Offer smaller packages ($3-5K quick wins) - Focus on retention over acquisition - Automation becomes MORE valuable when companies cut headcount --- ## ⚡ Level Up — AfrexAI Context Packs This free skill gives you the blueprint. For deep industry-specific context that makes your AI agents genuinely expert in your client's domain: | Your Client's Industry | Context Pack | |----------------------|-------------| | Law firms, legal ops | **Legal AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Healthcare, clinics | **Healthcare AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Real estate, property mgmt | **Real Estate AI Context Pack** — $47 | | E-commerce, retail | **Ecommerce AI Context Pack** — $47 | | SaaS companies | **SaaS AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Financial services | **Fintech AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Manufacturing, operations | **Manufacturing AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Construction, estimation | **Construction AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Consulting, professional services | **Professional Services AI Context Pack** — $47 | | Recruiting, staffing | **Recruitment AI Context Pack** — $47 | **Why this matters for agencies:** When you install industry context packs, your agents speak the client's language from Day 1. No learning curve. No generic advice. Pure domain expertise. 👉 Browse all packs: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/ --- ## 🔗 More Free Skills by AfrexAI - `clawhub install afrexai-openclaw-mastery` — Master OpenClaw agent setup - `clawhub install afrexai-agent-engineering` — Build production-grade AI agents - `clawhub install afrexai-sales-playbook` — B2B sales methodology - `clawhub install afrexai-proposal-gen` — Generate winning proposals - `clawhub install afrexai-pricing-strategy` — Optimize pricing for maximum revenue --- *Built by AfrexAI — AI that builds businesses.* 🖤💛


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)