Skill: openlark/novel-reviewer (version 1.0.0)

--- name: novel-reviewer description: Multi-dimensional novel evaluation based on provided content, assessing across plot, characters, writing quality, worldbuilding, pacing, originality, emotional resonance, dialogue quality, structure, and reader appeal, producing a total score. Use for book reviews, work evaluation, creative feedback, web novel assessment, and similar scenarios. --- # Multi-Dimensional Novel Evaluation System ## How to Use Provide novel content (chapter/excerpt/full submission), evaluate as follows: 1. **Input**: Title, author, genre (optional); body content 2. **Score by dimension**: 10 dimensions, each 1-10 points 3. **Comprehensive review**: Total score + strengths/weaknesses analysis + improvement suggestions ## Ten Evaluation Dimensions | Dimension | Weight | Scoring Summary | |-----------|--------|-----------------| | Plot Logic | 15% | Complete causal chain, reasonable conflict, foreshadowed reversals, no dumbing-down | | Character Development | 15% | Distinct personality, clear motivation, growth arc, dialogue matches profile | | Writing Quality | 12% | Language fluency, description precision, rhythm control, style consistency | | Worldbuilding | 10% | Self-consistent rules, unique originality, reasonable reveal rhythm | | Pacing | 12% | H/W/P/T ratio, information density, fatigue level, climax distribution | | Originality | 8% | Setting uniqueness, anti-trope plot, narrative approach novelty | | Emotional Resonance | 10% | Reader immersion, emotional tension, empathy trigger design | | Dialogue Quality | 8% | Dialogue naturalness, subtext, personalization, information delivery efficiency | | Structure | 5% | Volume/chapter clarity, foreshadowing resolution rate, multi-plot coordination | | Reader Appeal | 5% | Opening hook strength, cliffhanger effectiveness, sustained reading desire | Weights total 100%. Each dimension scored 1-10, weighted to produce **total score (out of 10)**. ## Scoring Tiers | Score | Tier | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | 9.0-10 | ⭐ Masterpiece | Nearly flawless across all aspects, industry benchmark | | 8.0-8.9 | 🌟 Excellent | Outstanding work with clear highlights | | 7.0-7.9 | 👍 Good | Quality online, pleasant reader experience | | 6.0-6.9 | 🆗 Readable | Above passing, room for improvement | | 5.0-5.9 | ⚠️ Weak | Multiple issues, needs targeted improvement | | <5.0 | ❌ Rewrite Needed | Fundamental problems exist | ## Evaluation Output Format ``` ═══════════════════════════════════════ 【Novel Evaluation Report】 Title: Author: Genre: Evaluation scope: Chapter X - Chapter Y I. Dimension Scores 1. Plot Logic: [X/10] weighted: X.X Comments: ... 2. Character Development: [X/10] weighted: X.X Comments: ... ... (10 items total) II. Total Score Total = Σ(dimension score × weight) = X.X / 10 Tier: XXX III. Overall Assessment - Greatest strengths: - Key weaknesses: - Comparison with similar works: - Target reader match: IV. Improvement Suggestions - Priority (high ROI): - Optional: - Not recommended to change (signature elements): ═══════════════════════════════════════ ``` See [references/dimensions.md](references/dimensions.md) for detailed per-dimension scoring guidelines.


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)