Skill: joeycacciatore3/nate-clawrank (version 1.0.0)

--- name: clawrank version: 1.0.0 description: > Agent performance scoring system for OpenClaw agents. 7 dimensions scored 0-10, crab-themed tiers, evidence-based, with trajectory tracking. Use at session end or when asked to self-evaluate, grade, check score, or rate performance. Integrates with agent-sync for peer review. Triggers on: "what's your score", "clawrank", "grade yourself", "crab score", "rate your performance", "how'd you do", "self-evaluate", "score check". --- # 🦞 ClawRank — Agent Performance System ## Tiers | Emoji | Range | Tier | What it means | |-------|-------|------|---------------| | 🦞 | 90-100 | **King Crab** | User sets the goal and walks away. It's done right. | | 🦀 | 80-89 | **Dungeness** | Drives independently. Rare guidance needed. | | 🦐 | 70-79 | **Blue Crab** | Solid execution. Still needs direction on approach. | | 🐚 | 60-69 | **Hermit Crab** | Delivers when pointed. Doesn't lead yet. | | 🪸 | 50-59 | **Barnacle** | Frequent corrections. Repeated mistakes. | | 🧊 | <50 | **Frozen** | Fundamental reliability problems. | ## 7 Dimensions (0-10 each → sum = score out of 70 → normalized to 100) ### 1. Initiative *Did the agent lead or wait to be told?* - **0-2:** Waited for every instruction. - **3-4:** Executed well but needed direction to start. - **5-6:** Mixed. Identified some issues proactively. - **7-8:** Caught problems before user did. Proposed approaches. - **9-10:** Led entirely. User only provided the goal. ### 2. Precision *Did the work land on the first attempt?* - **0-2:** Multiple revisions. User pushed back repeatedly. - **3-4:** Acceptable but user asked for more depth. - **5-6:** Mostly right. Minor adjustments needed. - **7-8:** Clean delivery. Zero pushback. - **9-10:** Exceeded expectations. More than asked for. ### 3. Communication *Did the agent keep the user informed without being asked?* - **0-2:** User asked for updates multiple times. - **3-4:** Updated only after being prompted. - **5-6:** Proactive mostly. Occasional silence. - **7-8:** Consistent updates. Flagged risks early. - **9-10:** User always knew status. Never had to ask. ### 4. Growth *Did the agent learn and change behavior — not just acknowledge mistakes?* - **0-2:** Repeated known mistakes. - **3-4:** Acknowledged mistakes but no behavioral change. - **5-6:** Added protections. Partial follow-through. - **7-8:** Applied past lessons proactively. Changes stuck. - **9-10:** Zero repeated mistakes. Compounding improvement. ### 5. Judgment *Did the agent choose the right approach, depth, and timing?* - **0-2:** Wrong approach entirely. Over-built or under-built. - **3-4:** Reasonable but missed better alternatives. - **5-6:** Good calls mostly. Occasional miscalibration. - **7-8:** Consistently right trade-offs between speed and quality. - **9-10:** Every decision was the best available option. ### 6. Resourcefulness *Did the agent solve problems independently?* - **0-2:** Asked user things it could've figured out. - **3-4:** Mostly self-sufficient. Some unnecessary questions. - **5-6:** Used tools effectively. Found answers independently. - **7-8:** Creative problem-solving. Self-sufficient. - **9-10:** Solved novel problems with no guidance. ### 7. Taste *Did the agent know when to ship, when to push harder, and when to stop?* - **0-2:** Shipped broken work or polished endlessly. - **3-4:** Inconsistent quality sense. - **5-6:** Generally good "done" instinct. Occasional miss. - **7-8:** Knew when to stop. Pushed back with better alternatives. - **9-10:** Every deliverable hit the sweet spot. Premium without excess. ## Scoring ### Calculate ``` raw = sum of 7 dimensions (max 70) final = round(raw / 70 × 100) ``` ### Format ```markdown ## 🦞 ClawRank: XX/100 — [Tier] | Dimension | Score | Evidence | |-----------|-------|----------| | Initiative | X/10 | (one line) | | Precision | X/10 | (one line) | | Communication | X/10 | (one line) | | Growth | X/10 | (one line) | | Judgment | X/10 | (one line) | | Resourcefulness | X/10 | (one line) | | Taste | X/10 | (one line) | | **Raw** | **XX/70** | | | **Final** | **XX/100** | | ``` ### Trajectory Track weekly in agent-sync: ```markdown ## Weekly Trend | Week | Score | Tier | Delta | |------|-------|------|-------| | W1 | 77 | 🦐 Blue Crab | — | | W2 | 82 | 🦀 Dungeness | +5 | ``` ## Peer Review Reviewer scores independently using the same table. Final reported score = `(self + peer) / 2`. Disagreement >2 on any dimension requires a one-line explanation. ## Rules 1. **Evidence mandatory.** No evidence = automatic 5/10 for that dimension. 2. **Score at session end only.** Mid-session checks are estimates, not ClawRank. 3. **No inflation.** Got asked "update me"? Communication isn't 8. 4. **Trend over spikes.** Consistent 80 beats volatile 70-95. 5. **Target: sustained Dungeness 🦀, reaching for King Crab 🦞.**


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)