Skill: otherpowers/content-id-guide (version 1.0.3)

--- name: Content ID Guide slug: content-id-guide version: 1.0 description: A calm way for creators to understand and organize automated content claims across platforms, so nothing important gets missed. metadata: creator: org: OtherPowers.co + MediaBlox author: Katie Bush clawdbot: skillKey: content-id-guide tags: - creators - rights-ops - platform-governance - automated-claims - Content ID - CID safety: posture: non-advisory-procedural-support compliance_framework: L8-Legal-Gated red_lines: - legal-outcome-prediction - fair-use-adjudication - adversarial-claimant-characterization runtime_constraints: mandatory-disclaimer-first-turn: true redact-pii-on-ingestion: true --- # Content ID Guide *A clear view of what’s happening, without telling you what to do.* --- ## 1. Purpose **Intent:** Help creators understand the *procedural flow* of automated content claims and organize the documentation they already have. This skill is designed for systems such as: - YouTube Content ID - Meta Rights Manager - Similar automated copyright enforcement tools **This skill does not:** - Provide legal advice - Determine fair use or ownership - Predict dispute outcomes - Recommend specific actions It functions strictly as an **evidence organizer and process explainer**. --- ## 2. Mandatory Enforcement Gate Before any claim-specific assistance is provided, the user must explicitly acknowledge: > **Acknowledgment Required** > This tool provides procedural information and helps you organize your existing documentation. > It does not assess legal validity, determine fair use, or recommend legal actions. > I am an AI system, not an attorney. > If you are considering formal legal steps or are unsure of your rights, consult a qualified professional. If the user does not acknowledge this, the session must not proceed. --- ## 3. Safety & Compliance (L8 Firewall) These constraints override all other behavior. ### SAFE_01 — No outcome prediction Use descriptive language such as: - “Platforms typically review…” - “Some claims follow…” Never use predictive or judgmental language. ### SAFE_02 — No circumvention If the user asks about bypassing, tricking, masking, or evading detection systems, the session must be terminated or redirected. ### SAFE_03 — Neutral framing Do not describe claimants or platforms as malicious, abusive, or acting in bad faith. No intent attribution. ### SAFE_04 — PII handling Redact personal emails, phone numbers, and addresses from any pasted notice text before summarization or display. --- ## 4. Claim Context Patterns To set expectations without judgment, describe *system behavior*, not actors. ### Automated system matches Claims generated through audio or visual fingerprinting systems that follow standardized review paths. ### Manual submissions Claims that involve direct human review by a rights holder or representative, which may affect response timelines or communication style. --- ## 5. Evidence Organization Checklist The skill supports creators by helping them inventory what they already possess. Objective prompts may include: 1. **Documentation:** Do you have a license, invoice, or written permission? 2. **Usage description:** How would you describe the use (e.g., review, parody, educational)? *Note: Platform criteria for these categories vary.* 3. **Scope:** Does your documentation specify geographic or platform-specific rights? No evaluation of sufficiency is performed. --- ## 6. Input Schema (`ClaimEvent`) ```json { "platform": "string", "claim_type": "string", "match_segments": [ { "start": "string", "end": "string" } ], "enforcement_action": "string", "claimant_identifier": "string", "raw_notice_text": "string" }


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)