Skill: duclawbot/claude (version 1.0.0)

--- name: Claude description: > Optimize long-context reasoning for commercial, legal, and high-stakes documents. Built for users who need stronger logic, cleaner structure, and deeper analysis across contracts, memos, negotiations, and complex written materials. version: 1.0.0 --- # Claude > **Turn long, messy, high-stakes documents into sharper reasoning and cleaner decisions.** Claude is a long-context reasoning optimizer for commercial and legal document workflows. Use this skill when you need to: - analyze long contracts, memos, proposals, or negotiations - improve reasoning quality across dense written material - surface contradictions, weak logic, or missing assumptions - compress large documents into decision-ready summaries - strengthen document structure before review or approval - compare multiple versions of a long-form document This skill does NOT: - replace licensed legal advice - guarantee correctness in regulated or high-risk matters - sign off on legal, tax, or compliance decisions - act as a substitute for professional counsel --- ## What This Skill Does Claude helps: - extract the core logic from long documents - identify missing assumptions and weak reasoning - clarify structure, argument flow, and decision relevance - detect inconsistencies, ambiguity, and hidden risk - improve summaries without losing critical nuance - rewrite dense content into cleaner, more usable formats --- ## Best Use Cases - contract review preparation - commercial memo analysis - proposal and redline review - policy comparison - negotiation brief preparation - board or executive memo compression - legal-adjacent document structuring --- ## What to Provide Useful input includes: - the full document or excerpt - the purpose of the review - the decision being supported - known risks or pressure points - the audience for the final output - whether you want diagnosis, summary, rewrite, or comparison --- ## Standard Output Format DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Purpose: [What this document is trying to do] Audience: [Who the output is for] Decision relevance: [Why this matters] CORE LOGIC ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ - [Main claim / obligation / commercial point] - [Supporting logic] - [Critical assumption] RISKS / WEAK POINTS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ [Ambiguity] ⚠️ [Contradiction] ⚠️ [Missing assumption] ⚠️ [Commercial or legal risk signal] STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1. [How to make reasoning clearer] 2. [How to reduce ambiguity] 3. [How to improve decision usefulness] RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ - [Review further / rewrite / compare versions / escalate to counsel / prepare summary] --- ## Reasoning Principles - preserve critical nuance - do not compress away risk - separate fact, inference, and recommendation - identify what is explicit vs implied - highlight missing assumptions before proposing conclusions - prefer clarity over flourish - never invent legal or commercial certainty --- ## Execution Protocol (for AI agents) When user provides a long document, follow this sequence: ### Step 1: Parse context Extract: - document type - intended audience - decision being supported - major obligations, claims, or asks - commercial or legal sensitivity ### Step 2: Identify logic structure Map: - what the document is saying - why it matters - what assumptions it depends on - what could fail under scrutiny ### Step 3: Detect weaknesses Check for: - ambiguity - contradiction - undefined terms - missing scope boundaries - missing decision logic - hidden risk transfer - structural confusion ### Step 4: Improve usefulness Depending on request: - summarize - rewrite - compare - diagnose - convert into brief / memo / checklist ### Step 5: Guardrails If legal or commercial certainty cannot be established from the text: - say so clearly - mark uncertainty - do not fabricate confidence --- ## Activation Rules (for AI agents) ### Use this skill when the user asks about: - long documents - contract-like text - legal-adjacent review - memo analysis - commercial document reasoning - dense text summarization with nuance - comparing two long versions of a document ### Do NOT use this skill when: - user only needs a casual short rewrite - user needs creative writing instead of reasoning - user needs formal legal advice or sign-off - user asks for certainty where the text does not support it ### If context is ambiguous Ask: "Do you want deep reasoning and document analysis, or just a simple rewrite?" --- ## Works Well With - `@ethagent/review` for narrower document review workflows - `@ethagent/draft` for rewriting after diagnosis - `@dpetcr/proposal` for commercial proposal refinement --- ## Boundaries This skill supports reasoning, structuring, and analysis of long commercial and legal-adjacent documents. It does not replace: - licensed legal advice - contract execution authority - procurement approval - tax or compliance judgment Use outputs as analytical support, not formal sign-off.


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)