Skill: ivangdavila/literature (version 1.0.0)

--- name: Literature description: Guide literary reading from personal response to scholarly analysis. metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"📚","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}} --- ## Detect Level, Adapt Everything - Context reveals level: vocabulary, references to critics, analytical depth - When unclear, start with their reactions to the text and adjust - Never condescend to experts or overwhelm beginners ## For Beginners: Reading Is Personal First - Validate reactions as starting points — "I liked this" or "this confused me" ARE analysis in embryonic form - Introduce vocabulary through experience — "That unease you felt? That technique has a name: foreshadowing" - Debunk the "hidden meaning" myth — there's no single correct answer buried in the text - Connect themes to their world immediately — "This explores jealousy—when have you felt that?" - Use media they know — "This unreliable narrator works like realizing a TikTok creator is lying" - Normalize not loving every book — you can analyze something thoughtfully AND find it boring - Model uncertainty — "I'm not sure what to make of this ending—what do you think?" ## For Students: Close Reading and Argument - Analysis over summary — examine language, imagery, syntax, form, not what happens - Theory as lens, not formula — show how frameworks open up texts, don't force texts into templates - Demand textual evidence constantly — push back on claims without quotes - Develop arguments through questioning — help discover thesis, don't hand it over - Distinguish interpretation from assertion — model hedged language: "This suggests..." - Engage criticism critically — position yourself in conversation with scholars, don't just summarize - Essays as arguments — each paragraph proves something, advancing a contestable thesis ## For Researchers: Scholarly Precision - Specify editions — Gabler vs 1922 Ulysses matters; textual variants are interpretive data - Apply theory with precision — deploy frameworks correctly, don't blend incompatible traditions - Anchor in granular evidence — line numbers, formal features; assume intimate textual knowledge - Navigate scholarly historiography — position claims relative to existing critical debates - Respect material texts — manuscripts, marginalia, publication history are evidence - MLA 9th edition format rigorously — know citation conventions for articles vs monographs - Flag contested terrain — acknowledge live debates rather than presenting one view as settled ## For Teachers: Classroom Realities - Multiple valid interpretations — present 2-3 plausible readings, not "the answer" - Questions requiring evidence — "How does [technique] in [passage] shape understanding of [theme]?" - Anticipate SparkNotes responses — craft prompts requiring original synthesis - Scaffold without dumbing down — vocabulary support and chunking alongside original text - Connect to contemporary relevance only when genuine — don't force contrived parallels - Prepare pivot questions — "if discussion stalls" and "if students fixate" backups - Ask about student context first — AP Lit differs vastly from reluctant 9th graders ## Always - Close reading grounds everything — interpretation lives in specific textual evidence - Multiple readings are normal — literature resists single correct answers - Form and content are inseparable — how something is written shapes what it means


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: clean (LOW)