Skill: arikmir/deep-dialogue (version 1.0.0)

--- name: deep-dialogue description: | Structured framework for deep philosophical and psychological conversations. Use when exploring personal issues, existential questions, meaning-making, belief examination, or psychological patterns. Guides conversations through clarification, framework application, dialectical challenge, and synthesis. Integrates Stoicism, Existentialism, Socratic Method, CBT, ACT, and Jungian psychology. --- # Deep Dialogue A structured approach to philosophical and psychological conversations that promotes genuine insight rather than surface-level advice. ## When to Use - Exploring personal psychological struggles - Examining beliefs, assumptions, or worldviews - Working through existential questions (meaning, purpose, death, freedom) - Processing difficult emotions with intellectual depth - Challenging unexamined patterns of thinking - Integrating philosophical frameworks with lived experience ## Conversation Phases ### Phase 1: Clarification (The Socratic Opening) Before anything else, understand what is actually being explored. **Questions to ask:** - "What specifically are you grappling with?" - "Can you give me a concrete example?" - "When you say [term], what do you mean by that?" - "What makes this feel important right now?" **Goal:** Precise understanding of the issue. No assumptions. ### Phase 2: Phenomenological Exploration Explore the lived experience before analyzing it. **Questions:** - "What does this feel like from the inside?" - "When does this show up most intensely?" - "What is the story you tell yourself about this?" - "What would you lose if this changed?" **Goal:** Map the terrain of the experience without judgment. ### Phase 3: Framework Application Introduce relevant philosophical/psychological frameworks. **Select based on the issue:** | Issue Type | Frameworks to Consider | |------------|------------------------| | Anxiety about outcomes | Stoicism (dichotomy of control) | | Meaning/purpose crisis | Existentialism (meaning-creation) | | Unexamined beliefs | Socratic Method | | Negative thought patterns | CBT (cognitive distortions) | | Avoidance patterns | ACT (values vs feelings) | | Repeated relationship patterns | Jungian (shadow, projection) | | Identity questions | Existentialism, Jungian (individuation) | **Application:** - Reference references/ files for framework details - Present framework concisely - Apply specifically to their situation - Ask: "Does this resonate? What fits? What does not?" ### Phase 4: Dialectical Challenge Push back constructively. This is where growth happens. **Techniques:** - Present counterarguments - Find exceptions to their rules - Ask "What if the opposite were true?" - Point out contradictions gently - Stress-test their conclusions **The stance:** Not adversarial - collaborative truth-seeking. ### Phase 5: Integration and Synthesis Help them articulate what has emerged. **Questions:** - "What has shifted in how you see this?" - "What is one thing you now understand differently?" - "If you had to explain this to someone else, what would you say?" - "What is one concrete thing you could do differently?" **Goal:** Crystallize insight into actionable understanding. ## Reference Files When diving deep into specific frameworks, load: - references/stoicism.md - references/existentialism.md - references/socratic-method.md - references/cbt.md - references/act.md - references/jungian.md ## Commands | Command | Action | |---------|--------| | /deep | Start a deep dialogue session | | /framework [name] | Load specific framework reference | | /challenge | Request dialectical pushback on current thinking | | /synthesize | Summarize what has emerged so far |


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: suspicious (MEDIUM)