Skill: duclawbot/brand (version 1.0.0)

--- name: brand description: > Complete brand intelligence system for founders, marketers, and creative professionals. Trigger whenever someone needs to build, refine, or communicate a brand: naming, positioning, messaging, visual identity direction, brand voice, competitive differentiation, or brand strategy. Also triggers on phrases like "help me name my business", "what is my brand voice", "how do I stand out", "write my brand story", "my brand feels inconsistent", or any scenario where someone is trying to make their business mean something to the people they serve. --- # Brand — Complete Brand Intelligence System ## What This Skill Does A brand is not a logo. It is not a color palette. It is not a tagline. A brand is what people believe about you when you are not in the room — the specific set of associations, feelings, and expectations that your name triggers in the minds of the people you are trying to reach. Everything visible — the logo, the words, the colors, the tone — is an attempt to shape those associations. Most attempts fail not because the execution is bad but because the strategy underneath it is unclear. When you do not know precisely what you want people to believe, no design or copy can produce it. This skill starts with the strategy. Everything else follows. --- ## Core Principle Differentiation is the only brand strategy. A brand that stands for the same thing as its competitors, expressed in slightly different visual language, is not a brand. It is a commodity with a logo. The only brands worth building — and the only ones that survive — are the ones that mean something specific to someone specific that no one else means in quite the same way. --- ## Workflow ### Step 1: Brand Audit and Foundation Before building anything, establish what currently exists and what needs to exist. ``` BRAND_AUDIT = { "current_state": { "perception_gap": "What do you want people to think vs what they actually think", "consistency_audit": "Are name, visual, voice, and message telling the same story", "competitive_map": "Where do you sit relative to competitors on key dimensions", "asset_inventory": "What brand assets exist and what is their current quality" }, "foundation_questions": [ "Who specifically is this brand for — not demographics, but psychographics", "What does this brand believe that its competitors do not", "What would be lost if this brand disappeared tomorrow", "What is the one thing this brand should be famous for", "What does this brand never do, no matter what" ] } ``` ### Step 2: Brand Positioning ``` POSITIONING_FRAMEWORK = { "classic_formula": { "structure": "For [target audience] who [need or problem], [brand name] is the [category] that [key benefit] because [reason to believe].", "rules": ["One target audience — not everyone", "One category — where you compete", "One benefit — what you do better than anyone", "One proof — why they should believe you"] }, "differentiation_dimensions": { "product": "What you make or do is genuinely different", "experience": "How people feel when they interact with you is different", "values": "What you stand for is different and attracts people who share it", "expertise": "Your depth of knowledge in a specific area is unmatched", "origin": "Where you come from or who you are gives your work specific meaning", "method": "How you do the work is different in ways that matter to customers" }, "positioning_mistakes": { "generic_benefit": "'High quality' and 'great service' position you nowhere", "audience_too_broad": "A brand for everyone is a brand for no one", "feature_focus": "Features describe what you do. Benefits describe why it matters.", "competitor_obsession": "Position toward your customer, not away from your competitor" } } ``` ### Step 3: Brand Naming ``` NAMING_FRAMEWORK = { "name_types": { "descriptive": { example: "General Electric", pro: "Clear", con: "Generic, hard to own" }, "suggestive": { example: "Netflix", pro: "Hints at benefit", con: "Requires explanation initially" }, "abstract": { example: "Apple", pro: "Ownable, versatile", con: "Must be taught" }, "acronym": { example: "IBM", pro: "Compact", con: "Meaningless until established" }, "founder": { example: "Ford", pro: "Authentic", con: "Limits if founder leaves" }, "invented": { example: "Kodak", pro: "Unique, protectable", con: "No inherent meaning" } }, "evaluation_criteria": { "distinctiveness": "Does it stand out in its category", "memorability": "Can people recall it after one exposure", "pronounceability": "Is it easy to say in every target market", "availability": "Domain available, trademark clear, social handles available", "scalability": "Will it still work if the business grows or pivots", "meaning": "Does it have relevant connotations in all target languages" }, "trademark_check": """ Before finalizing any name: 1. Search USPTO (US), EUIPO (Europe), or relevant national registry 2. Search common law use — Google, social media, web 3. Check domain availability — .com preferred for global brands 4. Check social handles across all relevant platforms 5. Consult trademark attorney for high-stakes naming """ } ``` ### Step 4: Brand Voice and Messaging ``` BRAND_VOICE_FRAMEWORK = { "voice_dimensions": { "personality": "The human traits your brand embodies — pick 3-4 that are specific", "tone_range": "How tone shifts by context — social vs formal vs crisis vs celebratory", "vocabulary": "Words you use and words you never use", "sentence_style": "Short and punchy vs long and considered vs conversational vs authoritative" }, "voice_archetypes": { "The Expert": "Authoritative, precise, evidence-based. Never simplistic.", "The Friend": "Warm, direct, honest. Says what others think but do not say.", "The Rebel": "Challenges conventions. Provocative but purposeful.", "The Guide": "Patient, clear, empowering. Makes complex things accessible.", "The Visionary": "Forward-looking, ambitious, inspiring. Talks about what could be.", "The Craftsperson": "Detail-obsessed, proud of process, quality over speed." }, "messaging_hierarchy": { "brand_promise": "The single most important thing the brand commits to deliver", "brand_story": "The narrative that explains why the brand exists and why it matters", "value_propositions": "The specific benefits for specific audience segments", "proof_points": "The evidence that makes the promises credible", "tagline": "The distillation of brand promise into memorable language" }, "tagline_principles": { "length": "Under 7 words. Under 5 is better.", "originality": "Cannot be used by any other brand in any category", "meaning": "Says something specific — not just motivational filler", "examples": { "strong": ["Just Do It", "Think Different", "Eat Fresh"], "weak": ["Quality You Can Trust", "Excellence in Everything We Do", "Your Partner for Success"] } } } ``` ### Step 5: Visual Identity Direction ``` VISUAL_IDENTITY_FRAMEWORK = { "logo_principles": { "simplicity": "Recognizable at any size including 16px favicon", "versatility": "Works in black and white, reversed, on any background", "distinctiveness": "Looks different from every competitor in the category", "timelessness": "Avoid trends — brand marks should last 10+ years" }, "color_strategy": { "primary": "One dominant color that owns your brand in the category", "secondary": "1-2 supporting colors for flexibility", "psychology": { "blue": "Trust, stability, expertise — tech, finance, healthcare", "green": "Growth, health, sustainability — wellness, environment, finance", "red": "Energy, urgency, passion — food, retail, entertainment", "black": "Premium, sophisticated, authority — luxury, fashion, technology", "yellow": "Optimism, clarity, warmth — consumer, food, children", "orange": "Friendly, confident, accessible — technology, retail, food" }, "differentiation": "Do not use the same color as your dominant competitor" }, "typography_principles": { "hierarchy": "Two typefaces maximum — one for headlines, one for body", "personality": "Type carries as much personality as color — choose deliberately", "readability": "Brand type must work at all sizes across all media" } } ``` ### Step 6: Brand Story ``` BRAND_STORY_STRUCTURE = { "elements": { "origin": "Why did this exist — what problem or moment created it", "belief": "What does the founder or organization fundamentally believe", "mission": "What change in the world is the brand working toward", "people": "Who is this brand for and what do they have in common", "difference": "What would not exist or not be possible without this brand" }, "story_rules": [ "The customer is the hero — not the founder, not the company", "Conflict creates interest — what was wrong before this existed", "Specificity creates belief — vague origin stories feel invented", "Emotion creates connection — facts inform, stories move people", "Truth creates trust — authenticity is detectable, so is its absence" ], "story_formats": { "about_page": "300-500 words, personal, specific, belief-driven", "elevator_pitch": "30 seconds, problem-solution-why us", "investor_narrative": "Origin, market, mission, traction, vision", "customer_facing": "Lead with their problem, not your solution" } } ``` --- ## Brand Consistency System ``` BRAND_CONSISTENCY = { "brand_guidelines_minimum": [ "Logo usage rules — clear space, minimum size, prohibited uses", "Color palette with exact codes — HEX, RGB, CMYK, Pantone", "Typography with specific fonts and usage rules", "Voice and tone guide with examples", "Messaging hierarchy — promise, story, value props, proof points" ], "consistency_audit_triggers": [ "Every 12 months — scheduled brand review", "New team members — before they create anything customer-facing", "New channel or market entry", "After any significant business pivot", "When brand feels like it has drifted" ] } ``` --- ## Quality Check Before Delivering - [ ] Positioning is specific enough that a competitor could not use it unchanged - [ ] Target audience is defined psychographically not just demographically - [ ] Brand voice has specific vocabulary and anti-vocabulary examples - [ ] Tagline passes the substitution test — cannot be used by a competitor - [ ] Visual direction aligns with positioning strategy - [ ] Brand story leads with customer problem not company history - [ ] All deliverables internally consistent — same brand, multiple expressions


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: suspicious (MEDIUM)