Skill: kc0bfv/let-fate-decide (version 1.0.2)

--- name: let-fate-decide description: "Draw Tarot cards using cryptographic randomness to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague or underspecified. Interprets a 4-card spread to guide next steps. Use when the user is nonchalant, feeling lucky, says 'let fate decide', makes Yu-Gi-Oh references ('heart of the cards'), demonstrates indifference about approach ('whatever you think', 'surprise me', 'dealer's choice'), or says 'try again' / 'draw again' on a system with no changes. Also triggers on sufficiently ambiguous prompts where multiple approaches are equally valid." --- # Let Fate Decide When the path forward is unclear, let the cards speak. Based on the [let-fate-decide plugin](https://github.com/theexpensiveexperience/Claude-Code_Audit-Research/tree/main/plugins/let-fate-decide) by theexpensiveexperience, licensed under [CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). ## Quick Start 1. Run the drawing script: ```bash python3 {baseDir}/scripts/draw_cards.py ``` 2. The script outputs JSON with 4 drawn cards, each with a `suit` and `card_id` 3. Look up each card's meaning in the appropriate file under `{baseDir}/cards/`: - `cards/major.md` — 22 Major Arcana - `cards/wands.md` — 14 Wands - `cards/cups.md` — 14 Cups - `cards/swords.md` — 14 Swords - `cards/pentacles.md` — 14 Pentacles Each card is under a heading matching its name (e.g. "# The Fool", "# Ace of Cups"). 4. Interpret the spread using [{baseDir}/references/INTERPRETATION_GUIDE.md]({baseDir}/references/INTERPRETATION_GUIDE.md) 5. Apply the interpretation to the task at hand ## When to Use - **Vague prompts**: The user's request is ambiguous and multiple valid approaches exist - **Explicit invocations**: "I'm feeling lucky", "let fate decide", "dealer's choice", "surprise me", "whatever you think" - **Yu-Gi-Oh energy**: "Heart of the cards", "I believe in the heart of the cards", "you've activated my trap card", "it's time to duel" - **Nonchalant delegation**: The user expresses indifference about the approach - **Redraw requests**: "Try again" or "draw again" when no actual system changes occurred (draw new cards) - **Tie-breaking**: When you genuinely cannot decide between equally valid approaches ## When NOT to Use - The user has given clear, specific instructions - The task has a single obvious correct approach - Safety-critical decisions (security, data integrity, production deployments) - The user explicitly asks NOT to use Tarot ## How It Works ### The Draw The script uses `os.urandom()` for cryptographic randomness: 1. Builds a standard 78-card Tarot deck (22 Major Arcana + 56 Minor Arcana) 2. Performs a Fisher-Yates shuffle using rejection sampling (no modulo bias) 3. Draws 4 cards from the top 4. Each card independently has a 50% chance of being reversed ### The Spread The 4 card positions represent: - **Position 1 — The Context**: What is the situation really about? - **Position 2 — The Challenge**: What obstacle or tension exists? - **Position 3 — The Guidance**: What approach should be taken? - **Position 4 — The Outcome**: Where does this path lead? ### Interpretation After drawing, look up each card in its suit file and synthesize meaning. See [{baseDir}/references/INTERPRETATION_GUIDE.md]({baseDir}/references/INTERPRETATION_GUIDE.md) for the full interpretation workflow. Key rules: - Reversed cards invert or complicate the upright meaning - Major Arcana cards carry more weight than Minor Arcana - The spread tells a story across all 4 positions; don't interpret cards in isolation - Map abstract meanings to concrete technical decisions ## Error Handling - **Script fails**: Report the error to the user and skip the reading. Do not invent cards. - **Card not found in file**: Interpret the card from its name and suit alone; continue the reading. - **Never fake entropy**: If the script cannot run, do not simulate a draw. Tell the user the draw failed. ## Rationalizations to Reject - "The cards said to, so I must" → Cards inform direction, they don't override safety or correctness - "This reading justifies my pre-existing preference" → Be honest if the reading challenges your instinct - "I'll keep drawing until I get what I want" → One draw per decision point; accept the reading


Security scan verdicts — ClawScan: clean | static analysis: clean | VirusTotal: clean | SkillSpector: suspicious (MEDIUM)