text
stringlengths 1.49k
1.79k
| label_text
stringclasses 8
values |
|---|---|
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: there you go nra parents ! now 's your chance to make sure your children are sacrificed to protect the right of uncle jim bob to own a gun he uses to threaten his wife with .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: he is also adding officers to the atf , which they claim they want . he is also adding $ 500m to `` mental health '' treatment , which they claim they want .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: if 20 children being shot in their school did n't , i seriously doubt this would . the reaction would most likely be `` moar gunz ! ''
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: maybe because i 'm a bit drunk and being screamed at staring down a fucking rifle barrel . maybe , just maybe , that will affect my thought process just a little bit . why ca n't this officer keep his calm ? it 's his fucking job to be a professional .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: umm , did n't this isis mess [ start under george w bush ] ( URL ) and the iraq war which [ john mccain supported ] ( URL ) ? thanks john for the orlando shooting . asshole .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: guess i have to keep posting this . rise in alt-right violence : URL gun-nuts ready to start killing americans they do n't agree with : URL **repeal the 2nd amendment . get rid of state ‘ gun laws ' . make real national laws , strictly enforced . **
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: repeal the 2nd amendment make real national laws , strictly enforced .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun non-Polarized </s> | Anti Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: what a well adjusted person , he deserves the right to own a gun . /s
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: lol , who the fuck is afraid of a maga hats ( well , except for the maga hat wearers who are too scared to wear it outside a maga rally ) ? all it tells us is that the wearer is a dumb racist fuck .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: let 's not jump to conclusions . maybe this was just some guy trying to bring the 1st amendment and the 2nd together !
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: fucking morons . goddamn them , the fucking morons . they made this . they allowed this . notice there is nothing being said about white terrorists . he 's still `` mentally ill . ''
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i like how they keep switching from mass murder to mass shooting . it isnt like after someone gets shot they do not have medical bills and problems as a result of being shot that may last their entire life .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i love how so many of these open carry dudes are all about cosplaying as soldiers but never seem to actually enlist .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |