California Code of Regulation, Title 13, 1968.1, Malfunction and Diagnostic Systems Requirements.

# California Code of Regulation, 
Title 13, 1968.1, Malfunction and Diagnostic Systems Requirements.
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/obdii06/19685clean.pdf

# (a) General
## (1) Applicability.
### (A)
>These procedures shall be used to assure compliance with the
requirements of title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR) section
1968.2 for all 2004 and subsequent model year passenger cars,
light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles, and engines certified on an
engine dynamometer for use in medium-duty vehicles (the
classifications of which shall jointly be referred to for purposes of this
regulation as vehicles) equipped with OBD II systems that have been
certified for sale in California.
### (B)
>Vehicles manufactured prior to the 2004 model year are covered by
the general enforcement and penalty provisions of the Health and
Safety Code, and the specific provisions of title 13, CCR sections
1968.1 and 2111 through 2149.
## (2) Purpose.
>The purpose of this section is to establish the enforcement protocol that
shall be used by the ARB to assure that vehicles certified for sale in
California are equipped with OBD II systems that properly function and
meet the purposes and requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
## (3) Definitions.
>The definitions applicable to these rules include those set forth in Health
and Safety Code section 39010 et seq. and in title 13, CCR sections
1900(b) and 1968.2(c), which are incorporated by reference herein. The
following definitions are specifically applicable to section 1968.5 and take
precedence over any contrary definitions.
“Days”, when computing any period of time, unless otherwise noted,
means normal working days that a manufacturer is open for business.
“Executive Officer” means the Executive Officer of the Air Resources
Board or his or her authorized representative.
“Influenced OBD II-Related Recall” means an inspection, repair,
adjustment, or modification program initiated and conducted by a
manufacturer as a result of enforcement testing conducted by the ARB or
any other information for the purpose of correcting any nonconforming
OBD II system for which direct notification of vehicle owners is necessary.
“Major Monitor” means those monitors covered by the requirements set
forth in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e)(1.0) through (e)(8.0), (e)(11.0)
through (e)(14.0), (e)(16.0), (f)(1.0) through (f)(9), (f)(12), (f)(13), and
(f)(16).
“Motor Vehicle Class” means a group or set of vehicles subject to
enforcement testing that have been determined by the Executive Officer to
share common or similar hardware, software, OBD II monitoring strategy,
or emission control strategy.
“Motor Vehicle Manufacturer”means the manufacturer granted
certification to sell motor vehicles in the State of California.
“Nonconforming OBD II System” means an OBD II system on a
production vehicle that has been determined not to comply with the
requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2. For purposes of section
1968.5, a motor vehicle class shall be considered nonconforming
irrespective of whether vehicles in the motor vehicle class, on average,
meet applicable tailpipe or evaporative emission standards.
“OBD II Emission Testing” refers to testing conducted to determine
compliance with the malfunction criteria in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e)
and (f) that are based on a multiple of, or an additive to, a tailpipe
emission standard or an absolute measurement from an applicable
emission test cycle (e.g., 1.5 times the applicable FTP emission
standards, PM standard plus 0.02 g/bhp-hr, PM level of 0.03 g/bhp-hr as
measured from an applicable emission test cycle).
“OBD II Ratio Testing” refers to testing conducted to determine
compliance with the required in-use monitor performance ratio in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1).
“Ordered OBD II-Related Recall” means an inspection, repair,
adjustment, or modification program required by the ARB to be conducted
by the manufacturer to correct any nonconforming OBD II system for
which direct notification of vehicle owners is necessary.
“Quarterly Reports” refer to the following calendar periods: January 1 –
March 31; April 1 – June 30; July 1 – September 30; October 1 –
December 31.
“Test Sample Group” means a group of production vehicles in a
designated motor vehicle class that are equipped with OBD II systems and
are selected and tested as part of the ARB enforcement testing program
set forth in section (b).
“Voluntary OBD II-Related Recall” means an inspection, repair,
adjustment, or modification program voluntarily initiated and conducted by
a manufacturer to correct any nonconforming OBD II system for which
direct notification of vehicle owners is necessary.
# (b) Testing Procedures
## (1) Purpose.
>To assure that OBD II systems on production motor vehicles comply with
the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2, the ARB may
periodically evaluate vehicles from a motor vehicle class.
## (2) Preliminary Testing and Evaluation.
### (A) 
>As part of his or her evaluation of vehicles to determine compliance
with the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2, the Executive
Officer may routinely conduct testing on any production vehicles that
have been certified for sale in California.
### (B) 
>Based upon such testing or any other information, including data from
California or other State Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) stations,
warranty information reports, and field information reports, the
Executive Officer may conduct enforcement testing pursuant to
sections (b)(3) through (5) below.
## (3) Vehicle Selection for Enforcement Testing.
### (A) Determining the Motor Vehicle Class.
>(i) Upon deciding to conduct enforcement testing, the Executive Officer
shall determine the motor vehicle class to be tested. In determining
the scope of the motor vehicle class to be tested, the Executive
Officer shall consider the similarities and differences in the OBD II
systems of potentially affected vehicles. Among other things, the
Executive Officer shall consider whether vehicles share similar
computer hardware and software, calibrations, or OBD II monitoring and emission control strategies.
(ii) The default motor vehicle class is the test group or OBD II group
used by the manufacturer to certify the vehicles to be tested.
However, upon concluding that a subgroup of vehicles differs from
other vehicles in the identified test group or OBD II group and that a
reasonable basis exists to believe that the differences may directly
impact the type of testing that will be performed, the Executive
Officer may determine that a subgroup of the test group or OBD II
group is the appropriate motor vehicle class for testing.
(iii) Similarly, upon concluding that vehicles from several OBD II groups
(which may include OBD II groups from different model years)
share such common characteristics that a reasonable basis exists
to believe that results of enforcement testing may be applicable to a
motor vehicle class larger than a specific test group or OBD II
group, the Executive Officer may determine that the appropriate
motor vehicle class includes more than one test group or OBD II
group.
(iv) Except for testing to determine if an OBD II system has been
designed to deactivate based on age and/or mileage (title 13, CCR
section 1968.2 (d)(1.3)), the Executive Officer may not conduct
testing of a motor vehicle class whose vehicles, on average,
exceed the defined full useful life of the motor vehicle class. For
purposes of the determination of this average, the Executive Officer
shall use the accrual rates appropriate for vehicles in the motor
vehicle class as defined in EMFAC2000 “Public Meeting to
Consider Approval of Revisions to the State’s On-Road Motor
Vehicle Emissions Inventory: Technical Support Document, Section
7.1, ‘Estimation of Average Mileage Accrual Rates from Smog
Check Data,’” May 2000, incorporated by reference.
### (B) Size of Test Sample Group.
>After determining the motor vehicle class to be tested, the Executive
Officer shall determine the appropriate number of vehicles to include in
the test sample group for enforcement testing in accordance with the
following guidelines:
(i) For OBD II emission testing, the Executive Officer shall follow the
provisions of title 13, CCR section 2137 regarding test sample size.
In accordance with section 2137, the Executive Officer shall test 10
vehicles that have been procured following the protocol of section
(b)(3)(C) below and meet the selection criteria of section (b)(3)(D)(i)
below to determine the emissions characteristics of the motor
vehicle class being tested.
(ii) For OBD II ratio testing, the Executive Officer shall collect data from
a test sample group of 30 vehicles that have been procured
following the protocol of section (b)(3)(C) below and meet the
selection criteria of section (b)(3)(D)(ii) below to determine the in-
use OBD II monitoring performance of the motor vehicle class
being tested.
(iii) In determining compliance with any other requirements of title 13,
CCR section 1968.2 (e.g., diagnostic connector location,
communication protocol standards, MIL illumination protocol,
evaporative system diagnostics, etc.), the Executive Officer shall
determine, on a case by case basis, the number of vehicles
meeting the selection criteria of section (b)(3)(D)(iii) needed to
assure that the results of such testing may be reasonably inferred
to the motor vehicle class. The Executive Officer’s determination
shall be based upon the nature of the noncompliance and the
scope of the motor vehicle class. The test sample group could be
as few as two test vehicles.
### (C)
>Protocol for Procuring Vehicles for Test Sample Group.
(i) For OBD II emission and ratio testing, the Executive Officer shall
procure vehicles consistent with the procurement process followed
by the Executive Officer under title 13, CCR section 2137 (e.g.,
obtaining lists of all vehicles in the motor vehicle class within a
specified geographical area, mailing postcards soliciting
participation of vehicles within the specified area, selecting vehicles
from those that responded to the solicitation, inspecting selected
vehicles to determine whether appropriate to include in sample
group, etc.). In selecting vehicles for OBD II emission testing, the
Executive Officer shall include only vehicles meeting the criteria set
forth in section (b)(3)(D)(i) below. For OBD II ratio testing, the
Executive Officer shall include only vehicles meeting the criteria set
forth in section (b)(3)(D)(ii) below.
(ii) For all other testing, the Executive Officer shall, on a case by case
basis, determine the appropriate manner for procuring vehicles. In
making his or her determination, the Executive Officer shall
consider the nature of the noncompliance and the scope of the
motor vehicle class. If the Executive Officer concludes that a
reasonable basis exists to believe that a vehicle operator’s driving
or maintenance habits would not substantially impact test results to
determine noncompliance, he or she may procure vehicle(s) by any
means that assures effective collection and testing of vehicles (e.g.,
rental car agencies, fleet vehicles, etc.). In all cases, however, the
selection process must ensure proper selection of vehicles in
accord with section (b)(3)(D)(iii) below.
### (D)Vehicles to be included in a Test Sample Group.
>(i) In selecting vehicles to be included in a test sample group for
enforcement OBD II emission testing, the Executive Officer shall
include only vehicles that:
a. Are certified to the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2
and California exhaust emission standards.
b. Are registered for operation in California.
c. Have mileage that is equal to or less than 75 percent of the
certified full useful life mileage and have an age of less than the
certified full useful life age for the subject vehicles.
d. Have not been tampered with or equipped with add-on or
modified parts that would cause the OBD II system not to
comply with the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2 or
would have a permanent effect on exhaust emission performance.
e. Have not been subjected to abuse (e.g., racing, overloading,
misfueling) neglect, improper maintenance, or other factors that
would cause the OBD II system not to comply with the
requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2 or would have a
permanent effect on exhaust emission performance.
f. Have no detected or known malfunction(s) that would affect the
performance of the OBD II system and are unrelated to the
monitor or system being evaluated. At its discretion, the ARB
may elect to repair a vehicle with a detected or known
malfunction and then include the vehicle in the test sample group.
g. Have had no major repair to the engine or major repair of the
vehicle resulting from a collision.
h. Have no problem that might jeopardize the safety of laboratory personnel.
(ii) In selecting vehicles to be included in a test sample group for
enforcement OBD II ratio testing, the Executive Officer shall include
only vehicles that:
a. Are certified to the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
b. Have collected sufficient vehicle operation data for the monitor
to be tested. For monitors required to meet the in-use monitor
performance ratio and to track and report ratio data pursuant to
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2), sufficient vehicle operation
data shall mean the denominator meets the criteria set forth in
sections (b)(3)(D)(ii)1. through 3. below. For monitors required
to meet the in-use monitor performance ratio but not required to
track and report ratio data pursuant to title 13, CCR section
6
1968.2(d)(3.2), sufficient vehicle operation data shall mean that
vehicles that have a denominator that meets the criteria set forth
in sections (b)(3)(D)(ii)1. through 3. below after undergoing
testing as set forth in section (b)(4)(C)(ii) below. Specifically,
the denominator, as defined in title 13, CCR section
1968.2(d)(4.3), for the monitor to be tested must have a value
equal to or greater than:
1. 150 for evaporative system monitors, secondary air system
monitors, and monitors utilizing a denominator incremented
in accordance with title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(d)(4.3.2)(E)
or (F) (e.g., cold start monitors, air conditioning system monitors, etc.), or
2. 50 for PM filter monitors and oxidation catalyst monitors
utilizing a denominator incremented in accordance with title
13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(4.3.2)(G), or
3. 300 for catalyst, oxygen sensor, EGR, VVT, and all other component monitors.
c. Have not been tampered with or equipped with add-on or
modified parts that would cause the OBD II system not to
comply with the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
d. Have mileage and age that are less than or equal to the certified
full useful life mileage and age for the subject vehicles.
(iii) In selecting vehicles to be included in a test sample group for
enforcement testing of any other requirement of title 13, CCR
section 1968.2 (not covered by sections (b)(3)(D)(i) or (ii) above),
the Executive Officer shall include only vehicles that:
a. Are certified to the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
b. Have not been tampered with or equipped with add-on or
modified parts that would cause the OBD II system not to
comply with the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
c. Have no detected or known malfunction(s) that would affect the
performance of the OBD II system and are unrelated to the
monitor or system being evaluated. At its discretion, the ARB
may elect to repair a vehicle with a detected or known
malfunction and then include the vehicle in the test sample
group.
d. Have mileage and age that are less than or equal to the certified
full useful life mileage and age for the subject vehicles.
(iv) If the Executive Officer discovers, by either evidence presented by
the manufacturer as provided in section (b)(7) or on his or her own,
that a vehicle fails to meet one or more of the applicable criteria of
section (b)(3)(D)(i) through (iii), the Executive Officer shall remove
the vehicle from the test sample group. The Executive Officer may
replace any vehicle removed with an additional vehicle selected in
accordance with sections (b)(3)(C) and (D) above. Test results
relying on data from the removed vehicle shall be recalculated
without using the data from the removed vehicle.
(4) Enforcement Testing Procedures.
(A) Prior to conducting any testing under section (b)(4), the Executive
Officer may replace components monitored by the OBD II system with
components that are sufficiently deteriorated or simulated to cause
malfunctions that exceed the malfunction criteria established pursuant
to title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e) and (f) in a properly operating
system. The Executive Officer may not use components deteriorated
or simulated to represent failure modes that could not have been
foreseen to occur by the manufacturer (e.g., the use of leaded gasoline
in an unleaded vehicle, etc.). Upon request by the Executive Officer,
the manufacturer shall make available all test equipment (e.g.,
malfunction simulators, deteriorated “threshold” components, etc.)
necessary to duplicate testing done by the manufacturer to determine
the malfunction criteria used for major monitors subject to OBD II
emission testing.
### (B)
>OBD II Emission Testing. After the test sample group has been
selected and procured, the Executive Officer may perform one or more
of the following tests:
(i) Emission testing with the test procedures used by the Executive
Officer for in-use testing of compliance with exhaust emission
standards in accordance with title 13, CCR sections 2138 and 2139.
(ii) On-road or dynamometer testing with the vehicle being driven in a
manner that reasonably ensures that all of the monitoring
conditions disclosed in the manufacturer's certification application for the tested monitor are encountered.
### (C)
>OBD II Ratio Testing.
(i) For OBD II ratio testing of monitors required to meet the in-use
monitor performance ratio and to track and report ratio data
pursuant to title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2), after the test
sample group has been selected and procured, the Executive
Officer shall download the data from monitors required to track and
report such data.
(ii) For OBD II ratio testing of monitors required to meet the in-use
monitor performance ratio but not required to track and report ratio
data pursuant to title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2), after the test
sample group has been selected and procured, the Executive
Officer shall collect data by installing instrumentation or data-
logging equipment on the vehicles. After installation of the
equipment, the vehicles shall be returned to the vehicle
owner/operator to continue to operate the vehicle until the minimum
denominator criteria (see section (b)(3)(D)(ii)b.) are satisfied. The
Executive Officer shall then calculate the ratio from the data
collected in a manner that will allow the Executive Officer to
effectively determine the in-use monitor performance ratio in
accordance with the requirements of title 13, CCR section
1968.2(d)(3.2).
### (D)
Testing for compliance with any other requirement of title 13, CCR
section 1968.2. After the test sample group has been selected and
procured, the Executive Officer may perform one or more of the
following tests:
(i) Emission testing on the applicable FTP cycle or other applicable
emission test cycle used for measuring exhaust or evaporative
emissions.
(ii) On-road or dynamometer testing with the vehicle being driven in a
manner that reasonably ensures that all of the monitoring
conditions disclosed in the manufacturer's certification application
for the tested monitor are encountered.
(iii) Any other testing determined to be necessary by the Executive
Officer. This may include, but is not limited to, the use of special
test equipment to verify compliance with standardization requirements.
## (5) Additional Testing.
>(A) Based upon testing of the motor vehicle class in section (b)(4) above
and after review of all evidence available at the conclusion of such
testing, the Executive Officer may elect to conduct further testing of a
subgroup of vehicles from the motor vehicle class if the Executive Officer has determined that:
(i) a subgroup of tested vehicles differs sufficiently enough from other
vehicles in the tested motor vehicle class, and
(ii) a reasonable basis exists to believe that the identified differences
may indicate that the subgroup may be nonconforming whereas the
tested motor vehicle class as a whole is not.
### (B)
>Hereinafter all references to motor vehicle class shall be applicable to the subgroup meeting the conditions of section (b)(5)(A) above.
### (C)
>In any testing of a subgroup of vehicles under section (b)(5), the
Executive Officer shall follow the vehicle selection and testing
procedures set forth in sections (b)(3) and (4) above.
## (6) Finding of Nonconformance after Enforcement Testing.
>After conducting enforcement testing pursuant to section (b)(4) above, the
Executive Officer shall make a finding of nonconformance of the OBD II
system in the identified motor vehicle class if:
### (A) OBD II Emission Testing.
>(i) Intermediate In-Use Gasoline Thresholds. For 2004 through 2008
model year vehicles subject to gasoline/spark ignited monitoring
requirements in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e) , the results of the
OBD II emission tests indicate that 50 percent or more of the
vehicles in the test sample do not properly illuminate the MIL when emissions exceed:
a. 2.0 times the FTP standards for malfunction criteria defined in
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e) that require MIL illumination at
1.5 or 1.75 times the FTP standards;
b. 3.5 times the FTP standards for malfunction criteria defined in
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e) that require MIL illumination at
2.5 times the FTP standards; or
c. 4.5 times the FTP standards for malfunction criteria defined in
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e) that require MIL illumination at
3.5 times the FTP standards.
(ii) Intermediate In-Use Diesel Thresholds.
a. For 2007 through 2012 model year vehicles subject to
diesel/compression-ignition monitoring requirements in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(f) , the results of the OBD II emission tests
indicate that 50 percent or more of the vehicles in the test
sample do not properly illuminate the MIL when emissions
exceed:
1. an additional 1.0 times the applicable standards above the
malfunction criteria for malfunction criteria defined in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(f) that require MIL illumination at less
than 3.5 times the applicable standards (e.g., 3.5 times the
applicable standards for a malfunction criteria of 2.5 times
the applicable standards); or
2. an additional 1.5 times the applicable standards above the
malfunction criteria for malfunction criteria defined in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(f) that require MIL illumination at
greater than or equal to 3.5 times the applicable standards
(e.g., 6.5 times the applicable standards for a malfunction
criteria o f 5.0 times the applicable standards); or
3. an additional 1.0 times the applicable standards above the
malfunction criteria for malfunction criteria defined in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(f) that require MIL illumination at an
additive threshold of less than or equal to 0.3 g/bhp-hr NOx,
an additive threshold of less than or equal to 0.02 g/bhp-hr
PM, or an absolute threshold of less than or equal to 0.03
g/bhp-hr (e.g., 0.07 g/bhp-hr PM for an additive malfunction
criteria of 0.03 g/bhp-hr with a standard of 0.02 g/bhp-hr); or
4. an additional 1.5 times the applicable standards above the
malfunction criteria for malfunction criteria defined in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(f) that require MIL illumination at an
additive threshold of greater than 0.3 g/bhp-hr NOx, an
additive threshold of greater than 0.02 g/bhp-hr PM, or an
absolute threshold of greater than 0.03 g/bhp-hr PM (e.g.,
1.0 g/bhp-hr NOx for an additive malfunction criteria of 0.5
g/bhp-hr with a standard of 0.2 g/bhp-hr).
b. For 2010 through 2012 model year medium-duty vehicles
certified to an engine dynamometer standard, the “applicable
standards” used in section (b)(6)(A)(ii) shall be limited to the
emission test cycle and standard (i.e., FTP or SET) determined
by the manufacturer to be more stringent and documented as
such in the certification application in accordance with title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(d)(6.1).
c. For 2007 through 2009 model year vehicles subject to
adjustment for infrequent regeneration events in accordance
with title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(6.2), OBD II emission
enforcement testing for monitors using the provisions of title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(d)(6.2.3) (baseline-derived adjustment
factors instead of malfunction threshold component-specific
adjustment factors) shall be limited to using emission test
results without the infrequent regeneration event occurring and
applying the same baseline-derived adjustment factors used by
the manufacturer at the time of certification.
(iii) Final In-Use Thresholds. For 2009 and subsequent model year
vehicles subject to the gasoline/spark-ignited requirements of title
13, CCR section 1968.2(e) and 2013 and subsequent model year
vehicles subject to the diesel/compression-ignition requirements of
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(f), the results of the OBD II emission
tests indicate that 50 percent or more of the vehicles in the test
sample do not properly illuminate the MIL when the emission
malfunction criteria defined in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e) or (f) are exceeded.
### (B) OBD II Ratio Testing.
>(i) For monitors specified in sections (b)(6)(B)(i)a. through e. below, the
data collected from the vehicles in the test sample indicate either
that the average in-use monitor performance ratio for one or more
of the monitors in the test sample group is less than 0.100 or that
66.0 percent or more of the vehicles in the test sample group have
an in-use monitor performance ratio of less than 0.100 for the same monitor:
a. monitors on 2004 through 2014 model year vehicles certified to
a ratio of 0.100 in accordance with title 13, CCR section
1968.2(d)(3.2.1) (D),
b. monitors specified in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e) on 2007
through 2012 model year vehicles for the first three model years
the monitor is certified to the in-use performance ratio
monitoring requirements of title 13, CCR sections
1968.2(d)(3.2.1)(A) through (C),
c. the fuel system air-fuel ratio cylinder imbalance monitor
specified in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e)(6.2.1)(C) on 2015
through 2017 model year vehicles,
d. the secondary exhaust gas sensor monitor specified in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(e)(7.2.2)(C) on 2012 through 2014 model
year vehicles, and
e. monitors specified in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(f) on 2013
through 2015 model year vehicles.
(ii) For monitors that are certified to the ratios in title 13, CCR sections
1968.2(d)(3.2.1)(A) through (C) and are not described in sections
(b)(6)(B)(i)b. through e. above, the data collected from the vehicles
in the test sample indicate either that 66.0 percent or more of the
vehicles in the test sample group have an in-use monitor
performance ratio of less than the required minimum ratio defined
in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1) for the same monitor or
that the average in-use monitor performance ratio for one or more
of the monitors in the motor vehicle class is less than the required
minimum ratio defined in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1) as
defined by determining the average in-use monitor performance
ratio for one or more of the monitors in the test sample group is less than:
a. 0.230 for secondary air system monitors and other cold start
related monitors utilizing a denominator incremented in
accordance with title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(4.3.2)(E) (e.g.,
cold start strategy monitors, etc.);
b. For evaporative system monitors:
1. 0.230 for monitors designed to detect malfunctions identified
in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e)(4.2.2)(C) (i.e., 0.020 inch
leak detection);
2. 0.460 for monitors designed to detect malfunctions identified
in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e)(4.2.2)(A) and (B) (i.e.,
purge flow and 0.040 inch leak detection);
c. 0.297 for catalyst, oxygen sensor, EGR, VVT system, and all
other monitors specifically required in section title 13, CCR
sections 1968.2(e) and (f) to meet the monitoring condition
requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2).
### (C)All Other OBD II Testing.
(i) The results of the testing indicate that at least 30 percent of the
vehicles in the test sample do not comply with the same
requirement of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
(ii) The results of the testing indicate that at least 30 percent of the
vehicles in the test sample do not comply with one or more of the
requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2 while the engine is
running and while in the key on, engine off position such that
Inspection and Maintenance or scan tool equipment designed to
access the following parameters via the standards referenced in
title 13, CCR section 1968.2 cannot obtain valid and correct data
for the following parameters:
a. The current readiness status from all on-board computers
required to support readiness status in accordance with Society
of Automotive Engineers J1979 (SAE J1979) as incorporated by
reference in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(g)(1) and section
1968.2(g)(4.1);
b. The current MIL command status while the MIL is commanded
off and while the MIL is commanded on in accordance with SAE
J1979 and title 13, CCR section 1968.2(g)(4.2), and in
accordance with SAE J1979 and title 13, CCR sections
1968.2(d)(2.1.2) during the MIL functional check and, if
applicable, title 13, CCR 1968.2(g)(4.1.3) during the MIL
readiness status check;
c. The current permanent fault code(s) in accordance with SAE
J1979 and section title 13, CCR 1968.2(g)(4.4);
d. The data stream parameters (Mode/Service $01) for: engine
speed (PID $0C) and OBD requirements to which the vehicle or
engine is certified (PID $1C); and for 2008 and subsequent
model year vehicles using the ISO 15765-4 protocol that have
not implemented permanent fault codes subject to (b)(6)(C)(ii)c.,
number of warm-up cycles since codes cleared (PID $30),
distance since codes cleared (PID $31), and engine run time
since codes cleared (PID $4E); as required in title 13, CCR
section 1968.2(g)(4.2) and in accordance with SAE J1979;
e. The CAL ID, CVN, and VIN (Mode $09 PIDs $01 through $06)
as required in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(g)(4.6), (g)(4.7.1),
(g)(4.7.3), and (g)(4.8) and in accordance with SAE J1979;
f. The proper identification of all data identified in (b)(6)(C)(ii)a.
through (b)(6)(C)(ii)e. as supported or unsupported as required
in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(g)(4) and in accordance with
SAE J1979 (e.g., Mode/Service $01, PIDs $00, $20, $40;
Mode/Service $09, PID $00, etc.); or
g. For vehicles using an alternate connector and communication
protocol (e.g., SAE J1939) as provided for in title 13, CCR
section 1968.2(g)(7.1), the parameters and data identified in
sections (b)(6)(C)(ii)a. through f. in accordance with title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(g)(4) and with the specified alternate
connector and communication protocol in lieu of in accordance with SAE J1979.
(iii) If the finding of nonconformance under section (b)(6)(C)(i) above
concerns vehicles that do not comply with the requirements of title
13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(4) or (5) (e.g., numerators or
denominators are not properly being incremented), it shall be
presumed that the nonconformance would result in an OBD II ratio
enforcement test result that would be subject to an ordered OBD II-
related recall in accord with the criterion in section (c)(3)(A)(i). The
manufacturer may rebut such a presumption by presenting
evidence in accord with section (b)(7)(C)(iii) below that
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer that the
identified nonconformance would not result in an ordered OBD II-
related recall under section (c)(3)(A)(i).
(7) Executive Officer Notification to the Manufacturer Regarding
Determination of Nonconformance.
(A) Upon making the determination of nonconformance in section (b)(6)
above, the Executive Officer shall notify the manufacturer in writing.
(B) The Executive Officer shall include in the notice:
(i) a description of each group or set of vehicles in the motor vehicle
class covered by the determination;
(ii) the factual basis for the determination, including a summary of the
test results relied upon for the determination;
(iii) a statement that the Executive Officer shall provide to the
manufacturer, upon request and consistent with the California
Public Records Act, Government Code section 6250 et seq., all
records material to the Executive Officer’s determination;
(iv) a provision allowing the manufacturer no less than 90 days from
the date of issuance of the notice to provide the Executive Officer
with any information contesting the findings set forth in the notice; and
(v) a statement that if a final determination is made that the motor
vehicle class is equipped with a nonconforming OBD II system, the
manufacturer may be subject to appropriate remedial action,
including recall and monetary penalties.
(C)Within the time period set by the Executive Officer in section
(b)(7)(B)(iv) and any extensions of time granted under section
(b)(7)(H), the manufacturer shall provide the Executive Officer,
consistent with paragraphs (i) through (iii) below, with any test results,
data, or other information derived from vehicle testing that may rebut or
mitigate the results of the ARB testing, including any evidence that a
motor vehicle class, if determined to be nonconforming, should be
exempted from mandatory recall. (See section (c)(3)(B) below.).
(i) For OBD II emission testing and OBD II ratio testing:
a. The manufacturer may submit evidence to demonstrate that
vehicles in the test sample group used by the Executive Officer
were inappropriately selected, procured, or tested in support of
a request to have vehicles excluded from the test sample group
in accordance with section (b)(3)(D)(iv).
b. If the manufacturer elects to conduct additional testing of
vehicles in the motor vehicle class and submit the results of
such testing to the Executive Officer, the manufacturer shall:
1. Present evidence that it has followed the vehicle
procurement and test procedures set forth in sections (b)(3) and (4) above, or
2. If the manufacturer elects to use different procurement and
testing procedures, submit a detailed description of the
procedures used and evidence that such procedures provide
an equivalent level of assurance that the results are
representative of the motor vehicle class.
(ii) If the manufacturer objects to the size of the test sample group or
the method used to procure vehicles in the test sample group used
by the Executive Officer pursuant to section (b)(3)(B)(iii) or
(b)(3)(C)(ii), the manufacturer shall set forth what it considers to be
the appropriate size and procurement method, the reasons
therefore, and test data from vehicles that confirm the
manufacturer’s position.
(iii) If the manufacturer elects to present evidence to overcome the
presumption of nonconformance in section (b)(6)(C)(iii) above, the
manufacturer shall demonstrate that the vehicles in the motor
vehicle class comply with in-use monitor performance ratio
requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2) by presenting:
a. Evidence in accord with the procurement and testing
requirements of sections (b)(3) and (4).
b. Any other evidence that provides an equivalent level of proof
that vehicles operated in California comply with the in-use
monitor performance ratio requirements.
(D)The Executive Officer may, but is not required to, accept any
information submitted by a manufacturer pursuant to section (b)(7)(C)
above after the time established for submission of such information
has passed unless the manufacturer could not have reasonably
foreseen the need for providing the information within the time period
provided. In determining whether to accept late information, the
Executive Officer will consider the lateness of the submission, the
manufacturer’s reasons for why such information was not timely
presented, the materiality of the information to the Executive Officer’s
final determination, and what effect any delay may have on effective
enforcement and the health and welfare of the State.
### (E) 
>The requirements of section (b)(7) shall not be construed to abridge
the manufacturer’s right to assert any privilege or right provided under
California law.
### (F) 
>After receipt of any information submitted by the manufacturer
pursuant to section (b)(7)(C) above, the Executive Officer shall
consider all information submitted by the manufacturer and may
conduct any additional testing that he or she believes is necessary.
### (G)
>Final Determination.
(i) Within 60 days after completing any additional testing that the
Executive Officer deemed necessary under section (b)(7)(F) above,
the Executive Officer shall notify the manufacturer of his or her final
determination regarding the finding of nonconformity of the OBD II
system in the motor vehicle class. The determination shall be
made after considering all of the information collected and received,
including all information that has been received from the
manufacturer.
(ii) The notice must include a description of each test group(s), OBD II
group(s), or subgroups thereof, that has been determined to have a
nonconforming OBD II system and set forth the factual bases for
the determination.
### (H)
>Extensions. The Executive Officer may for good cause extend the time
requirements set forth in section (b)(7). In granting additional time to a
manufacturer, the Executive Officer shall consider, among other things,
any documentation submitted by the manufacturer regarding the time
that it reasonably believes is necessary to conduct its own testing, why
such information could not have been more expeditiously presented,
and what effect any delay caused by granting the extension may have
on effective enforcement and the health and welfare of the State. The
Executive Officer shall grant a manufacturer a reasonable extension of
time upon the manufacturer demonstrating that despite the exercise of
reasonable diligence, the manufacturer has been unable to produce
relevant evidence in the time initially provided.
# (c) Remedial Action
## (1) Voluntary OBD II-Related Recalls.
>If a manufacturer initiates a voluntary OBD II-related recall campaign, the
manufacturer shall notify the Executive Officer of the recall at least 45
days before owner notification is to begin. The manufacturer shall also
submit a voluntary OBD II-related recall plan for approval, as prescribed
under section (d)(1) below. A voluntary recall plan shall be deemed
approved unless disapproved by the Executive Officer within 30 days after
receipt of the recall plan.
## (2) Influenced OBD II-Related Recalls.
### (A) 
>Upon being notified by the Executive Officer, pursuant to section
(b)(7)(G), that a motor vehicle class is equipped with a nonconforming
OBD II system, the manufacturer may, within 45 days from the date of
service of such notification, elect to conduct an influenced OBD II-
related recall of all vehicles within the motor vehicle class for the
purpose of correcting the nonconforming OBD II systems. Upon such
an election, the manufacturer shall submit an influenced OBD II-related
recall plan for approval, as prescribed under section (d)(1) below.
(B) If a manufacturer does not elect to conduct an influenced OBD II-
related recall under section (c)(2)(A) above, the Executive Officer may
order the manufacturer to undertake appropriate remedial action, up to
and including the recall and repair of the nonconforming OBD II
systems.
(3) Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall.
## (A) 
Except as provided in sections (c)(3)(B) below, the Executive Officer
shall order the recall and repair of all vehicles in a motor vehicle class
that have been determined to be equipped with a nonconforming
OBD II system if enforcement testing conducted pursuant to section (b)
above or information received from the manufacturer indicates that:
(i) For monitors on 2007 and subsequent model year vehicles certified
to the ratios in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(d)(3.2.1)(A) through
(C), the average in-use monitor performance ratio for one or more
of the major monitors in the test sample group is less than or equal
to 33.0 percent of the applicable required minimum ratio
established in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1) (e.g., if the
required ratio is 0.336, less than or equal to a ratio of 0.111) or 66.0
percent or more of the vehicles in the test sample group have an in-
use monitor performance ratio of less than or equal to 33.0 percent
of the applicable required minimum ratio established in title 13,
CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1) for the same major monitor. For
monitors on 2004 through 2014 model year vehicles certified to the
0.100 ratio in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1)(D), the
Executive Officer shall determine the remedial action for
nonconformances regarding the in-use monitor performance ratio in
accordance with section (c)(4) below.
(ii) When the vehicle is tested on-road and driven so as to reasonably
encounter all monitoring conditions disclosed in the manufacturer’s
certification application, the OBD II system is unable to detect and
illuminate the MIL for a malfunction of a component/system
monitored by a major monitor (other than the monitors for misfire
causing catalyst damage and the evaporative system) prior to
emissions exceeding two times the malfunction criteria of title 13,
CCR sections 1968.2(e) and (f) (e.g., if the malfunction criteria is
1.75 times the applicable FTP standard, recall would be required
when emissions exceed 3.5 times the applicable FTP standard or if
the malfunction criteria is the PM standard plus 0.02 g/bhp-hr and
the PM standard is 0.01 g/bhp-hr, recall would be required when
emissions exceed 0.06 g/bhp-hr). Additionally, for the first two
years that a new major monitor is required in title 13, CCR section
1968.2(e) (e.g., 2006 and 2007 model year for cold start strategy
monitoring in title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e)(11)), the Executive
Officer shall use three times the malfunction criteria in lieu of two
times the malfunction criteria (e.g., if the malfunction criterion is 1.5
times the applicable FTP standard, recall would be required when
emissions exceed 4.5 times the applicable FTP standard).
Additionally, for major monitors on 2007 through 2009 model year
vehicles certified to the monitoring requirements in title 13, CCR
section 1968.2(f), the Executive Officer shall determine the
remedial action for nonconformances regarding emission
exceedance in accordance with section (c)(4) below in lieu of the
criteria in section (c)(3)(ii). For purposes of the emission
exceedance determination, carbon monoxide (CO) emissions are not considered.
(iii) The monitor for misfire causing catalyst damage is unable to
properly detect and illuminate the MIL for misfire rates that are
more than 20 percentage points greater than the misfire rates
disclosed by the manufacturer in its certification application as
causing catalyst damage (e.g., if the disclosed misfire rate is 12
percent, recall would be required if the misfire rate is greater than
32 percent without proper detection).
(iv) When the vehicle is tested on-road and driven so as to reasonably
encounter all monitoring conditions disclosed in the manufacturer’s
certification application, the evaporative system monitor is unable to
detect and illuminate the MIL for a cumulative leak or leaks in the
evaporative system equivalent to that caused by an orifice with a
diameter of at least 1.5 times the diameter of the required orifice in
title 13, CCR section 1968.2(e)(4.2.2)(C).
(v) When the vehicle is tested on-road and driven so as to reasonably
encounter all monitoring conditions disclosed in the manufacturer’s
certification application, the OBD II system cannot detect and
illuminate the MIL for a malfunction of a component that effectively
disables a major monitor and the major monitor, by being disabled,
meets the criteria for recall identified in sections (c)(3)(A)(ii) or (iv)
above (e.g. is unable to detect and illuminate the MIL for
malfunctions that cause FTP emissions to exceed two times the malfunction criteria).
(vi) The motor vehicle class cannot be tested so as to obtain valid test
results in accordance with the criteria identified in section
(b)(6)(C)(ii) due to the nonconforming OBD II system.
(B) A motor vehicle class shall not be subject to mandatory recall if the
Executive Officer determines that, even though a monitor meets a
criterion set forth in section (c)(3)(A)(i)-(vi) for mandatory recall:
(i) The OBD II system can still detect and illuminate the MIL for all
malfunctions monitored by the nonconforming monitor (e.g.,
monitor “A” is non-functional but monitor “B” is able to detect all
malfunctions of the component(s) monitored by monitor “A”).
(ii) The monitor meets the criterion solely due to a failure or
deterioration mode of a monitored component or system that could
not have been reasonably foreseen to occur by the manufacturer.
(iii) The failure or deterioration of the monitored component or system
that cannot be properly detected causes the vehicle to be
undriveable (e.g., vehicle stalls continuously or the transmission will
not shift out of first gear, etc.) or causes an overt indication such
that the driver is certain to respond and have the problem corrected
(e.g., illumination of an over-temperature warning light or charging
system light that uncorrected will result in an undriveable vehicle,
etc.).
### (C)
>A motor vehicle class that is not subject to mandatory recall pursuant
to paragraph (B) above may still be subject to remedial action pursuant
to section (c)(4) below.
## (4) Other Ordered Remedial Action.
### (A)
If the Executive Officer has determined based upon enforcement
testing conducted pursuant to section (b) above or information
received from the manufacturer that a motor vehicle class is equipped
with a nonconforming OBD II system and the nonconformance does
not fall within the provisions of section (c)(3)(A) above, he or she may
require the manufacturer to undertake remedial action up to and
including recall of the affected motor vehicle class.
### (B) 
>In making his or her findings regarding remedial action, the Executive
Officer shall consider the capability of the OBD II system to properly
function. This determination shall be based upon consideration of all
relevant circumstances including, but not limited to, those set forth
below.
(i) Whether the manufacturer identified and informed the ARB about
the nonconformance(s) or whether the ARB identified the
nonconformance(s) prior to being informed by the manufacturer.
(ii) The number of nonconformances.
(iii) If the identified nonconformance(s) is with a major monitor(s), the
nature and extent of the nonconformance(s), including:
a. the degree to which the in-use monitor performance ratio(s) is
below the required ratio(s) specified in title 13, CCR section
1968.2(d)(3.2.1), and
b. the amount of the emission exceedance(s) over the established
malfunction criteria set forth in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e)
and (f) before a malfunction is detected and the MIL is illuminated.
(iv) If the identified nonconformance(s) is with a non-major monitor the
nature and extent of the nonconformance(s), including:
a. the degree to which the in-use monitor performance ratio(s)
(where applicable) is below the required ratio(s) specified in title
13, CCR section 1968.2(d)(3.2.1),
b. the degree to which the monitored component must be
malfunctioning or exceed the established malfunction criteria set
forth in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e) and (f) before a
malfunction is detected and the MIL is illuminated, and
c. the effect that the nonconformance(s) has on the operation of a
major monitor(s).
(v) The impact of the nonconformance on vehicle owners (e.g., cost of
future repairs, driveability, etc.) and the ability of the service and
repair industry to make effective repairs (e.g., difficulty in accessing
fault information, diagnosing the root cause of a failure, etc.).
(vi) The degree to which the identified nonconformance(s) complicates,
interferes with, disrupts, or hampers a service technician’s ability to
follow California I/M testing protocol when performing a California
I/M inspection.
(vii) The failure of the data link connector of the motor vehicle class to
meet the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2(g)(2).
(viii) The failure of the crankcase ventilation system in a motor vehicle
class to comply with the requirements of title 13, CCR sections
1968.2(e)(9) or (f)(10).
(ix) The failure of the cooling system monitor in a motor vehicle class to
properly verify that the cooling system reaches the highest enable
temperature used for any other monitor when the vehicle is
operated in the monitoring conditions disclosed in the
manufacturer's certification application, or failure to comply with any
requirement in title 13, CCR sections 1968.2(e)(10) or (f)(11).
(x) The estimated frequency that a monitor detects a malfunction and
illuminates the MIL when no component malfunction is present (i.e., false MILs).
(xi) The estimated frequency that a monitor fails to detect a malfunction
and illuminate the MIL when the monitoring conditions, as set forth
in the manufacturer’s approved certification application, have been
satisfied and a faulty or deteriorated monitored component is
present (i.e., false passes).
(xii) Whether the manufacturer submitted false, inaccurate, or
incomplete documentation regarding the identified nonconformance
at the time of certification pursuant to title 13, CCR section
1968.2(i) and the extent to which the false, inaccurate, or
incomplete documentation was material to the granting of certification.
(C)In making the determination, the average tailpipe and evaporative
emissions of vehicles within the affected motor vehicle class shall not be considered.
(5) Assessment of Monetary Penalties.
The Executive Officer may seek penalties pursuant to the applicable
provisions of the Health and Safety Code for violations of the requirements
of title 13, CCR section 1968.2 or for production vehicles otherwise failing
to be equipped with OBD II systems that have been certified by the ARB.
In determining the penalty amounts that the ARB may seek, the Executive
Officer shall consider all relevant circumstances including the factors set forth below:
(A) Whether the manufacturer self-reported the nonconformity or the ARB
discovered the nonconformity independent of the manufacturer.
(B) The nature and degree of the nonconformity and whether the
manufacturer should reasonably have discovered the nonconformity
and taken corrective action by voluntary OBD II-related recall or
running changes during the production year.
(C)The economic benefits, if any, gained by the manufacturer from not
complying with the provisions of title 13, CCR section 1968.2.
(D)The manufacturer’s history of compliance with the OBD II
requirements.
(E) The preventative efforts taken by the manufacturer to avoid
noncompliance, including any programs followed by the manufacturer
to ensure compliance.
(F) The manufacturer’s efforts to correct the nonconformity once it was
identified.
(G)The innovative nature and magnitude of effort, including the cost of any
other proposed remedial action, necessary to correct the
nonconformity.
(H)The deterrent effect of the penalty.
(I) Whether the manufacturer has failed to provide complete and accurate
information required to be submitted at the time of certification
pursuant to title 13, CCR section 1968.2(i).
(J) The nature and degree that OBD II systems on production vehicles
differ from the systems that have been certified by the ARB.
## (6) Notice to Manufacturer for an Ordered Remedial Action.
### (A) 
>The Executive Officer shall immediately notify the manufacturer upon
the Executive Officer determining the type of remedial action to be
taken.
### (B) 
>For remedial actions other than the assessment of monetary penalties,
the notice must:
(i) specifically set forth the remedial action that is being ordered,
(ii) include a description of the test group(s), OBD II group(s), or
subgroup(s) thereof, that has been determined to have a
nonconforming OBD II system,
(iii) set forth the factual bases for the determination, and
(iv) designate a date at least 45 days from the date of receipt of such
notice by which the manufacturer shall submit a plan, pursuant to
section (d)(1) below, outlining the remedial action to be undertaken
consistent with the Executive Officer’s order. Except as provided in
section (c)(7)(C) below, all plans shall be submitted to the Chief,
Mobile Source Operations Division, 9528 Telstar Avenue, El Monte,
California 91731, within the time limit specified in the notice. The
Executive Officer may grant the manufacturer an extension of time
for good cause.
(C)For cases in which the ARB elects to seek monetary penalties
pursuant to authority granted under the Health and Safety Code, the
Executive Officer shall issue a notice to the manufacturer that he or
she will be filing a complaint in the appropriate administrative or civil
court forum seeking penalties against the manufacturer for violations of
title 13, CCR section 1968.2. The notice must include a description of
the test group(s), OBD II group(s), or subgroup(s) thereof, that have
been determined to have a nonconforming OBD II system and set forth
the factual bases for the determination.
(7) Availability of Public Hearing to Contest Remedial Actions Other than
Determination to Seek Monetary Penalties.
(A) Within 45 days from the date of receipt of the notice that is required
under section (c)(6) above, the manufacturer may request a public
hearing pursuant to the procedures set forth in title 17, CCR section
60055.1, et seq., to contest the findings of nonconformity, the
necessity for, or the scope of any ordered remedial action. Pursuant to
those procedures, the Executive Officer has the initial burden of
presenting evidence that those parts of the Executive Officer’s
determination specifically challenged are supported by the facts and
applicable law. (Title 17, CCR section 60055.32(d)(1).) Each issue of
controversy shall be decided based upon the preponderance of the
evidence presented at the hearing. (Title 17, CCR section
60055.32(h).)
### (B) 
>Notwithstanding the provisions of title 17, CCR section 60055.17(a)(1),
administrative hearings conducted pursuant to a request filed under
section (c)(7)(A) above shall be referred to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, which shall otherwise follow the procedures established in
title 17, CCR section 60055.1 et seq.
### (C)
>If a manufacturer requests a public hearing pursuant to section
(c)(7)(A) above and if the Executive Officer’s determination of
nonconformity is confirmed at the hearing, the manufacturer shall
submit the required remedial action plan in accordance with section
(d)(1) below within 30 days after receipt of the Board’s decision.
(d) Requirements for Implementing Remedial Actions
(1) Remedial Action Plans.
(A) A manufacturer initiating a remedial action (voluntary, influenced, or
ordered), other than payment of monetary penalties, shall develop a
remedial action plan that contains the following information, unless otherwise specified:
(i) A description of each test group, OBD II group, or subgroup thereof
covered by the remedial action, including the number of vehicles,
the engine families, test groups, or subgroups within the identified
class(es), the make(s), model(s), and model years of the covered
vehicles, and such other information as may be required to identify the covered vehicles.
(ii) A description of the nonconforming OBD II system and, in the case
of a recall (whether voluntary, influenced, or ordered), the specific
modifications, alterations, repairs, adjustments, or other changes to
correct the nonconforming OBD II system, including data and/or
engineering evaluation supporting the specific corrections.
(iii) A description of the method that the manufacturer will use to
determine the names and addresses of vehicle owners and the
manufacturer’s method and schedule for notifying the service
facilities and vehicle owners of the remedial action.
(iv) A copy of all instructions that the manufacturer will use to notify
service facilities about the required remedial action and the specific
corrections, if any, that will be required to be made to the
nonconforming OBD II systems.
(v) A description of the procedure to be followed by vehicle owners to
obtain remedial action for the nonconforming OBD II system. This
must include the date, on or after which the owner can have
required remedial action performed, the time reasonably necessary
to perform the labor to remedy the nonconformity, and the
designation of facilities at which the nonconformity can be remedied.
(vi) If some or all of the nonconforming OBD II systems are to be
remedied by persons other than dealers or authorized warranty
agents of the manufacturer, a description of such class of service
agents and what steps, including a copy of all instructions mailed to
such service agents, the manufacturer will take to assure that such
agents are prepared and equipped to perform the proposed remedial action.
(vii) A copy of the letter of notification to be sent to vehicle owners.
(viii) A proposed schedule for implementing the remedial action,
including identified increments of progress towards full implementation.
(ix) A description of the method that the manufacturer will use to
assure that an adequate supply of parts will be available to initiate
the remedial action campaign on the date set by the manufacturer
and that an adequate supply of parts will continue to be available throughout the campaign.
(x) A description and test data of the emission impact, if any, that the
proposed remedial action may cause to a representative vehicle
from the motor vehicle class to be remedied.
(xi) A description of the impact, if any, and supporting data and/or
engineering evaluation, that the proposed remedial action will have
on fuel economy, driveability, performance, and safety of the motor
vehicle class covered by the remedial action.
(xii) Any other information, reports, or data which the Executive Officer
may reasonably determine to be necessary to evaluate the
remedial action plan.
### (B) 
>Approval and Implementation of Remedial Action Plans.
(i) If the Executive Officer finds that the remedial action plan is
designed effectively to address the required remedial action and
complies with the provisions in section (d)(1)(A) above, he or she
shall notify the manufacturer in writing within 30 days of receipt of
the plan that the plan has been approved.
(ii) The Executive Officer shall approve a voluntary, influenced, or
ordered remedial action plan if the plan contains the information
specified in section (d)(1)(A) above and is designed to notify the
vehicle owner and implement the remedial action in an expeditious manner.
(iii) In disapproving an ordered remedial action plan, the Executive
Officer shall notify the manufacturer in writing of the disapproval
and the reasons for the determination. The manufacturer shall
resubmit a revised remedial action plan that fully addresses the
reasons for the Executive Officer’s disapproval within 10 days of
receipt of the disapproval notice.
(iv) Upon receipt of the approval notice of the ordered remedial action
plan from the Executive Officer, the manufacturer shall, within 45
days of receipt of the notice, begin to notify vehicle owners and
implement the remedial action campaign.
(v) If the Executive Officer disapproves a voluntary or influenced
remedial action plan, the manufacturer shall either accept the
proposed modifications to the plan as suggested by the Executive
Officer, resubmit a revised remedial action plan that fully addresses
the reasons for the Executive Officer’s disapproval within 30 days,
or be subject to an Executive Officer order that the manufacturer
undertake appropriate remedial action pursuant to section (c)(2)(B) above.
(vi) Upon receipt of the voluntary or influenced remedial action
approval notice from the Executive Officer, the manufacturer shall
begin to notify vehicle owners and implement the remedial action
campaign according to the schedule indicated in the remedial action plan.
(2) Eligibility for Remedial Action.
(A) The manufacturer may not condition a vehicle owner’s eligibility for
remedial action required under section 1968.5 on the proper
maintenance or use of the vehicle.
(B) The manufacturer shall not be obligated to repair a component which
has been modified or altered such that the remedial action cannot be
performed without additional cost.
(3) Notice to Owners.
(A) The manufacturer shall notify owners of vehicles in the motor vehicle
class covered by the remedial order. The notice must be made by
first-class mail or by such other means as approved by the Executive
Officer. When necessary, the Executive Officer may require the use of
certified mail for ordered remedial actions to assure effective
notification.
(B) The manufacturer shall use all reasonable means necessary to locate
vehicle owners, including motor vehicle registration lists available from
the California Department of Motor Vehicles and commercial sources
such as R.L. Polk & Co.
(C)The notice must contain the following:
(i) For ordered remedial actions, a statement: “The California Air
Resources Board has determined that your (vehicle or engine) (is
or may be) equipped with an improperly functioning on-board
emission-related diagnostic system that violates established
standards and regulations that were adopted to protect your health
and welfare from the dangers of air pollution.”
(ii) For voluntary and influenced remedial actions, a statement: “Your
(vehicle or engine) (is or may be) equipped with an improperly
functioning on-board emission-related diagnostic system that
violates (California or California and Federal) standards and
regulations” if applicable as determined by the Executive Officer.
(iii) A statement that the nonconformity of any such vehicles will be
remedied at the expense of the manufacturer.
(iv) A statement that eligibility for remedial action may not be denied
solely on the basis that the vehicle owner used parts not
manufactured by the original equipment vehicle manufacturer, or
had repairs performed by outlets other than the vehicle
manufacturer’s franchised dealers.
(v) Instructions to the vehicle owners on how to obtain remedial action,
including instructions on whom to contact (i.e., a description of the
facilities where the vehicles should be taken for the remedial
action), the first date that a vehicle may be brought in for remedial
action, and the time that it will reasonably take to correct the
nonconformity.
(vi) The statement: “In order to assure your full protection under the
emission warranty provisions, it is recommended that you have
your (vehicle or engine) serviced as soon as possible. Failure to do
so could be determined as lack of proper maintenance of your
(vehicle or engine).”
(vii) A telephone number for vehicle owners to call to report difficulty in
obtaining remedial action.
(viii) A card to be used by a vehicle owner in the event the vehicle to
be recalled has been sold. Such card should be addressed to the
manufacturer, have postage paid, and shall provide a space in
which the owner may indicate the name and address of the person
to whom the vehicle was sold or transferred.
(ix) If the remedial action involves recall, the notice must also provide:
a. A clear description of the components that will be affected by
the remedial action and a general statement of the measures to
be taken to correct the nonconformity.
b. A statement that such nonconformity, if not corrected, may
cause the vehicle to fail an emission inspection or I/M smog check test.
c. A statement describing the adverse effects, if any, of an
uncorrected nonconforming OBD II system on the performance,
fuel economy, or durability of the vehicle.
d. A statement that after remedial action has been taken, the
manufacturer will have the service facility issue a certificate
showing that a vehicle has been corrected under the recall
program, and that such a certificate will be required to be
provided to the Department of Motor Vehicles as a condition for vehicle registration.
(D)A notice sent pursuant to this section or any other communication sent
to vehicle owners or dealers may not contain any statement,
expressed or implied, that the OBD II system is compliant or that the
OBD II system will not degrade air quality.
(E) The Executive Officer shall inform the manufacturer of any other
requirements pertaining to the notification under section (d)(3) which
the Executive Officer has determined as reasonable and necessary to
assure the effectiveness of the recall campaign.
(4) Label Indicating that Recall Repairs Have Been Performed.
(A) If the required remedial action involves recall of a test group(s), OBD II
group(s), or subgroup(s) thereof, the manufacturer shall require those
who perform inspections and/or recall repairs to affix a label to each
vehicle that has been inspected and/or repaired.
(B) The label must be placed in a location approved by the Executive
Officer and must be fabricated of a material suitable for such location
in which it is installed and which is not readily removable.
(C)The label must contain the remedial action campaign number and a
code designating the facility at which the remedial action or inspection
to determine the need for remedial action was performed.
(5) Proof of Performance of Remedial Action Certificate.
If the required remedial action involves a recall, the manufacturer shall
provide, through its service agents, to owners of vehicles that have had
the remedial action performed a certificate that confirms that the vehicle
has been recalled and that required inspection and/or repairs have been
performed. The certificate must be in a format prescribed by the
Executive Officer, however, the Executive Officer may not require a format
different in any way from the format of the certificate required in title 13,
CCR sections 2117 and 2129.
(6) Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements.
(A) The manufacturer shall maintain sufficient records to enable the
Executive Officer to conduct an analysis of the adequacy of the
remedial action.
(B) Unless otherwise specified by the Executive Officer, the manufacturer
shall report on the progress of the remedial action campaign by
submitting reports for eight consecutive quarters commencing with the
quarter immediately after the recall campaign begins. The reports
shall be submitted no later than 25 days after the close of each
calendar quarter to: Chief, Mobile Source Operations Division, 9528
Telstar Avenue, El Monte, California 91731. For each recall campaign,
the quarterly report must contain the following:
26
(i) The test group and the remedial action campaign number
designated by the manufacturer and a brief description of the
nature of the campaign.
(ii) The date owner notifications began and date completed.
(iii) The number of vehicles involved in the remedial action campaign.
(iv) The number of vehicles known or estimated to be equipped with
the nonconforming OBD II system and an explanation of the means
by which this number was determined.
(v) The number of vehicles inspected during the campaign since its
inception.
(vi) The number of vehicles found to be affected by the nonconformity
during the campaign since its inception.
(vii) The number of vehicles receiving remedial action during the
campaign since its inception.
(viii) The number of vehicles determined to be unavailable for
inspection or remedial action, during the campaign since its
inception, due to exportation, theft, scrapping, or other reasons
(specify).
(ix) The number of vehicles, during the campaign since its inception,
determined to be ineligible for remedial action under section
(d)(2)(B).
(x) An initial list, using the following data elements and designated
positions, indicating all vehicles subject to recall that the
manufacturer has not been invoiced for, or a subsequent list
indicating all vehicles subject to the recall that the manufacturer has
been invoiced for since the previous report. The list must be
supplied in a standardized computer format to be specified by the
Executive Officer. The data elements must be written in “ASCII”
code without a comma separating each element. For example:
XTY32A71234E-9456123408-25-91A. The add flag (see below)
should reflect the vehicles for which the manufacturer has not been
invoiced and the delete flag should reflect changes since the
previous report. The Executive Officer may change the frequency of
this submittal depending on the needs of enforcement. The
Executive Officer may not, however, require a frequency or format
for this submittal that is different in any way from the frequency or
format determined by the Executive Officer as required for reporting
of data in title 13, CCR sections 2119(a)(10) and 2133(a)(10).
Data Elements Positions
• File Code (designated by DMV) 1
• License Plate Number 2-8
• Last three VIN positions 9-11
• Recall ID Number 12-17
• Mfg. ID Number 18-22
(Mfg. Occupational License Number)
• Recall Start Date (mmddyyyy) 23-30
• Add or Delete Flag (A/D) 31
• Complete VIN if personalized license plate 32-48
(File Code “L” or “S”)
(xi) A copy of any service bulletins issued during the reporting period
by the manufacturer to franchised dealerships or other service
agents that relate to the nonconforming OBD II system and the
remedial action and have not previously been reported to the
Executive Officer.
(xii) A copy of all communications transmitted to vehicle owners that
relate to the nonconforming OBD II systems and the required
remedial action and have not been previously reported to the
Executive Officer.
(C)If the manufacturer determines that any of the information submitted to
the Executive Officer pursuant to section (d) has changed or is
incorrect, the manufacturer shall submit the revised information, with
an explanation.
(D)The manufacturer shall maintain in a form suitable for inspection, such
as computer information, storage devices, or card files, and shall make
available to the Executive Officer or his or her authorized
representative upon request, the names and addresses of vehicle
owners:
(i) To whom notification was sent;
(ii) Whose vehicles were repaired or inspected under the recall
campaign;
(iii) Whose vehicles were determined not to be eligible for remedial
action because the vehicles were modified, altered, or unavailable
due to exportation, theft, scrapping, or other reason specified in the
answer to sections (d)(6)(B)(viii) and (ix).
(E) The information gathered by the manufacturer to compile the reports
required by these procedures must be retained for no less than one
year beyond the useful life of the vehicles and must be made available
to authorized personnel of the ARB upon request.
(F) The filing of any report under the provisions of these procedures must
not affect the manufacturer’s responsibility to file reports or
applications, obtain approval, or give notice under any other provisions of law.
(7) Extension of Time.
Upon request of the manufacturer, the Executive Officer may extend any
deadline set forth in section 1968.5(d) upon finding that the manufacturer
has demonstrated good cause for the requested extension.
(e) Penalties for Failing to Comply with the Requirements of Section (d).
(1) In addition to the penalties that may be assessed by the Executive Officer
pursuant to section (c) because of a manufacturer’s failure to comply with
the requirements of title 13, CCR section 1968.2, a manufacturer may be
subject to penalties pursuant to section 43016, Health and Safety Code for
failing to comply with the requirements of section (d).
(2) If a manufacturer fails to comply with a voluntary or influenced remedial
action plan, the Executive Officer may order remedial action pursuant to
section (c) above.
NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43000.5, 43013, 43016, 43018,
43100, 43101, 43104, 43105, 43105.5, 43106, 43154, 43211, and 43212, Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39018, 39021.5,
39024, 39024.5, 39027, 39027.3, 39028, 39029, 39031, 39032, 39032.5, 39033,
39035, 39037.05, 39037.5, 39038, 39039, 39040, 39042, 39042.5, 39046,
39047, 39053, 39054, 39058, 39059, 39060, 39515, 39600,-39601, 43000,
43000.5, 43004, 43006, 43013, 43016, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43102, 43104,
43105, 43105.5, 43106, 43150, 43151, 43152, 43153, 43154, 43155, 43156,
43204, 43211, and 43212, Health and Safety Code.
# Final Regulation Order
Malfunction and Diagnostic System Requirements for 2004 and Subsequent Model-Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles and Engines (OBD II)
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2009/hdobd09/oalfro19682.pdf

California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Malfunction and Diagnostic System Requirements and Enforcement for 2004 and Subsequent Model Year Passenger Cars, Light Duty Trucks, and Medium Duty Vehicles and Engines; Notice of Decision
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/11/07/2016-26861/california-state-motor-vehicle-pollution-control-standards-malfunction-and-diagnostic-system

 Legislative Regulation Review Committee 2009-040 !kpartment of Environmental Protection
CALIFORNIA LOW EMISSION VEHICLES & MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION STANDARDS
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/rrdata/rr/2009RR-2009-0040-R00.pdf

# 参考資料
私の Calendar 2022 ーー はじめたきっかけ、1月のふりかえり、今後の展望
https://qiita.com/torifukukaiou/items/891db4e40a7f6194af56

## 自己参照
今、Calendar2021を書いている理由
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/dca73e903785bea2a106

＜この記事は個人の過去の経験に基づく個人の感想です。現在所属する組織、業務とは関係がありません。＞
# 文書履歴(document history)
ver. 0.01 初稿 　20220227
ver. 0.02 ありがとう追記 20230504
## 最後までおよみいただきありがとうございました。
いいね　💚、フォローをお願いします。
####  Thank you very much for reading to the last sentence.
Please press the like icon 💚　and follow me for your happy life.