Billion Dollar open source particle collider. Can we get proof of special relativity?

![image.png](https://qiita-image-store.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/0/950107/a7334148-1ecc-fb08-177e-05f822b26b45.png)

“The CMS detector is built around a huge solenoid magnet. This takes the form of a cylindrical coil of superconducting cable that generates a field of 4 tesla, about 100,000 times the magnetic field of the Earth. The field is confined by a steel “yoke” that forms the bulk of the detector’s 14,000-tonne weight.”
The photon interacts with the electromagnetic field and also gravity (special gravity). It is therefore obvious gravity is a major factor in studying photon collision at high speeds.  To do this we would need a billion dollar CMS detector. How else can we speed up photons to the speed of light and smash like Hulk. I am a devout follower of Jesus Christ and I follow his sayings found in the bible.
“In all things I have shown you that by working hard in this way we must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he himself said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’
The word weak in greek= “ἀσθενούντων (asthenountōn) — “Has 3 Occurrences in the bible.” It means to help the disable or the “unable to take effective action; helpless or powerless.” Yes, very few people have a billion dollar particle collider.
GRK: πλῆθος τῶν ἀσθενούντων τυφλῶν χωλῶν
NAS: of those who were sick, blind,
KJV: multitude of impotent folk, of blind,
INT: a multitude of those who were sick blind lame
“One of the strengths of the open source community has been its ability to bring concentrated effort to bear on big problems. When tragedy strikes, or a pressing need arises, there are groups of people who gather together to attempt to solve the problems as a community.”

In physics we can thank CERN on their new data policy to help the poor who do not have the equipment, but want to work on very complicated problems. 
“A new open data policy for scientific experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will make scientific research more reproducible, accessible, and collaborative” As quoted:
The CMS experiment at CERN is happy to announce a new batch of open data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), this time encompassing all the data recorded by CMS in 2011. With this release, CMS has brought all proton-proton collision data recorded in 2010 and 2011 into the public domain, free to use and available to anyone. This is the fifth data release by CMS since 2014 and adds to the earlier open data from the LHC’s first data-taking period (“Run1”), from 2010 to 2012.
This release consists of 18 new datasets, thus bringing the integrated luminosity, used as the measure of collected data, to 5 inverse femtobarns for 2011 data, in addition to 11 inverse femtobarns of 2012 data already available. With more data at hand, the studies on these public data can now be done with increased precision.”
Within this batch of data we can find “simulated proton-proton collision events at a center-of-mass energy:” This data could be use to find proof of General Relativity.
 ![image.png](https://qiita-image-store.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/0/950107/db0ce53b-c35d-decb-42ca-3f8290afbe2a.png)

The center-of-mass energy of a system of particles is the energy measured in the center-of-mass reference frame…This energy constitutes all the energy that is available to create new particles or to explore the internal structure of particles, since the energy of the motion of the center of mass itself stays with the center of mass and cannot change the internal properties of the system.”
To put it in simple geometric shapes 
 ![image.png](https://qiita-image-store.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/0/950107/cc63562d-7bcc-4860-3dc7-cad548e0c86f.png)

The center of mass is the center of an object (G1). In a photon the center is much difficult to picture but the following diagram might help. Please see the GIF animated link.
 
![image.png](https://qiita-image-store.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/0/950107/ea9a1849-5e1d-7920-3c39-5d89eee039bf.png)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kerr_photon_orbits_with_orbital_inclination.gif
“At the same time, investigations of black-body radiation carried out over four decades (1860–1900) by various researchers[47] culminated in Max Planck's hypothesis[48][49] that the energy of any system that absorbs or emits electromagnetic radiation of frequency ν is an integer multiple of an energy quantum E = hν. As shown by Albert Einstein,[10][50] some form of energy quantization must be assumed to account for the thermal equilibrium observed between matter and electromagnetic radiation; for this explanation of the photoelectric effect, Einstein received the 1921 Nobel Prize in physics”
Thermal equilibrium between matter and the electromagnetic force or “radiation”.
“Einstein concluded that if an object, which is at rest relative to an inertial frame, either absorbs or emits an amount of energy LL, its inertial mass will correspondingly either increase or decrease by an amount L/ c2L (2). So what this means is “ Einstein’s conclusion that the inertial mass of an object changes if the object absorbs or emits energy” My postulation would say that inertial mass  would increase or decreased by the amount L/ [c2^2] this violation the information paradox, but if it is converted to kinetic energy base on the square energy dependence. This is just an assumption (It’s wrong but) based on not having the 30 terabits of data and not being very good at math. Forgive me for making such a fast 
conclusion. 
“Equivalently, the total mass of the products of the collision is observed to be Μ = 4mp. Using Equation (1), one finds for the incoming proton Elab = 7mpc2, which means that the accelerator must supply 6mpc2 of kinetic energy (6 × 0.938 = 5.6 GeV), since Elab = Tlab + mpc2. Using Equation (2), one also find Tlab = 6mpc2.
To illustrate the effect of the square root energy dependence, consider the laboratory energy required to provide ECM = 100mpc2 (94 GeV) in a proton-proton collision. Then Equation (1) yields Elab = 4,999mpc2, requiring the accelerator to supply 4,998mpc2 of kinetic energy (4.7 TeV). A 25-fold increase in the center-of-mass energy requires an accelerator more than 800 times more powerful.”
We know (I mostly from Wikipedia) In a magnetic field photons velocity of a photon is perpendicular to the field. The magnetic energy of a photon is “…implies, magnetic energy density is 0.5 * 10^−21. Then, B = sqrt(2 * mu * 0.5 * 10^−21) = sqrt (mu* 10^−21) =10^-10.5 * sqrt(mu), where mu is the permeability of the medium. If its vacuum, then  B = 10^-10.5 * sqrt (4 pi 10^-7) = 2 * 10^-14 * sqrt (pi)  = 3.5456 * 10^-14 Tesla 
The question that arises is the relationship between the magnetic energy of a photon and the magnetic flux density of the collider. How does the moving particle affect the electromagnetic field? It seems like photons magnetic is very miniscule so it’s quantum properties but they are important.
“Hence, moving charged particles carry electromagnetic fields.” 
m = (4⁄3) E / c2
This relationships must state (Thinking logic) the same at high velocities in the form of a constant. This is obvious when we study gravity. “A constant acceleration is quite different. If you travel with a constant acceleration, your velocity is always changing, but it’s changing by a consistent amount each second. The acceleration due to gravity on the Earth has the constant value 9.8 m/s2, so you can imagine this like dropping something from a skyscraper. The velocity starts low, but increases by 9.8 m/s for every second it is falling under gravity.” 
It is very interesting that in the theory of relativity space and time are linked by velocity (Light), on a straight line not perpendicular to its magnetic force. I would never question Einstein on anything but some physicist do.
“Equally surprising is that although Einstein was the first to propose the correct relationship, E = mc2, he didn’t actually prove it, at least according to his own special relativity.”

ありがとうございます。私の投稿はルールに従っています。神のご加護を。
Sources:
https://home.cern/science/experiments/cms
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/energy-center-mass#:~:text=The%20center%2Dof%2Dmass%20energy,reference%20frame%20(see%20below).
https://pushpay.com/blog/20-reasons-its-better-to-give-than-to-receive/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/was-einstein-the-first-to-invent-e-mc2/#:~:text=Indeed%2C%20the%20immortal%20equation's%20fame,system%20measures%20its%20energy%20content.
http://opendata.cern.ch/
https://opensource.com/life/14/11/five-humanitarian-open-source-projects
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kerr_photon_orbits_with_orbital_inclination.gif
https://snappygoat.com/s/?q=bestof%3ACenter+gravity+2.png+Step+3+to+determine+the+en+center+of+gravity+in+an+arbitrary+2D+shape+en+wikipedia+2006-01-29+BAxelrod+wikipedia+en+center+gravity+2+svg#48beca09261b56ee6da9f7ee8aa1d1ea3060e158,0,272.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Quantization_of_the_electromagnetic_field
https://opentextbc.ca/universityphysicsv2openstax/chapter/motion-of-a-charged-particle-in-a-magnetic-field/
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_amplitude_of_magnetic_field_created_by_one_photon_with_energy_10-14_erg
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/magnetic-flux-density#:~:text=The%20magnetic%20flux%20density%20or,is%20the%20tesla%20(T).&text=This%20relationship%20is%20used%20in,1).