# ESG Characteristics
|  | ESG Benchmark | ESG Integration | Engagement | Exclusion Criteria | Proxy Voting |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Applied criteria |  |  |  |  |  |

| Top 10 positions - ESG Characteristics Instrument Name | Weight | GICS sector | ESG rating | Controversy flag |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 13.38% | Banks | AA | Orange |
| HONG KONG EXCHANGES AND CLEARING L | 6.73% | Financial Services | AA | Green |
| AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING | 6.15% | Banks | AA | Orange |
| DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD | 5.21% | Banks | AA | Green |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LTD DEF | 5.14% | Banks | AA | Yellow |
| OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING LTD | 3.36% | Unclassified | AA | Green |
| TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS | 3.27% | Industrial Goods & Services | AAA | Green |
| GOODMAN GROUP UNITS | 3.13% | Real Estate | AA | Green |
| FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD | 2.58% | Basic Resources | AA | Green |
| WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LTD | 2.32% | Oil & Gas | AAA | Green |

| ESG overview |  |
| --- | --- |
| ESG Portfolio against traditional benchmark |
|  | Portfolio | Benchmark |
| Overall ESG quality rating | AAA | AAA |
| Overall ESG quality score | 10.00 | 9.46 |
| ESG score environment | 6.12 | 5.21 |
| ESG score social | 5.05 | 4.88 |
| ESG score governance | 6.75 | 6.21 |
| Coverage for MSCI Rating/Scoring | 99.32% | 99.66% |
| Weighted Average MSCI Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e/$M sales) | 163.37 | 241.76 |
|  |  |  |
| Asset breakdown - by ESG rating In % of total economic exposure (ESG Portfolio against traditional benchmark) |  |  |

|  | Portfolio | Benchmark | Relative |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AAA | 19.51 | 8.80 | 10.71 |
| AA | 65.63 | 40.58 | 25.05 |
| A | 12.19 | 37.33 | -25.14 |
| BBB | 1.98 | 6.32 | -4.34 |
| BB | 0.49 | 2.44 | -1.96 |
| B | 0.04 | 3.51 | -3.47 |
| CCC | n/a | 0.67 | -0.67 |
| Others | 0.17 | 0.34 | -0.17 |

Portfolio 
Benchmark 

Translation (ENDE, 2022-02-28):
# ESG-Merkmale
## ESG Benchmark	ESG Integration	Engagement  Ausschlusskriterien Stimmrechtsvertretung

## Angewendete Kriterien					
| Top-10-Positionen - ESG-Merkmale Wertschriften Name | Gewicht. | GICS-Sektor | ESG-Rating | Warnung zu kontroversen |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 13.38% | Banken | AA | Orange |
| HONG KONG EXCHANGES AND CLEARING L | 6.73% | Finanzdienstleistungen | AA | Grün |
| AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING | 6.15% | Banken | AA | Orange |
| DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD | 5.21% | Banken | AA | Grün |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LTD DEF | 5.14% | Banken | AA | Gelb |
| OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING LTD | 3.36% | Nicht klassifiziert | AA | Grün |
| TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS | 3.27% | Industrielle Güter & |  | AAA |  | Grün |
|  |  | Dienstleistungen |  |  |
| GOODMAN GROUP UNITS | 3.13% | Immobilienanlagen | AA | Grün |
| FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD | 2.58% | Grundstoffe | AA | Grün |
| WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LTD | 2.32% | Öl und Gas | AAA | Grün |

| ESG-Übersicht |  |
| --- | --- |
| ESG-Portfolio im Vergleich zum traditionellen Benchmark |
|  | Portfolio | Benchmark |
| Overall ESG quality rating | AAA | AAA |
| Overall ESG quality score | 10.00 | 9.46 |
| Environment (Umwelt) | 6.12 | 5.21 |
| Social (Soziales) | 5.05 | 4.88 |
| Governance | 6.75 | 6.21 |
| Coverage MSCI Rating/Scoring | 99.32% | 99.66% |
| Gewichtete durchschnittliche MSCI Kohlenstoffintensität (Tonnen CO2e / USD Mio. Umsatz) | 163.37 | 241.76 |
|  |  |  |
| Vermögensstruktur - nach ESG Rating in % des gesamten ökonomischen Exposure (ESG-Portfolio im Vergleich zum traditionellen Benchmark) |  |  |

|  | Portfolio | Benchmark | Relativ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AAA | 19.51 | 8.80 | 10.71 |
| AA | 65.63 | 40.58 | 25.05 |
| A | 12.19 | 37.33 | -25.14 |
| BBB | 1.98 | 6.32 | -4.34 |
| BB | 0.49 | 2.44 | -1.96 |
| B | 0.04 | 3.51 | -3.47 |
| CCC | n.a. | 0.67 | -0.67 |
| Rest | 0.17 | 0.34 | -0.17 |

Portfolio 
Benchmark 