# ESG Supplement
As at 28 February 2023
| ESG Profile | Index 1 | Non-ESG Benchmark 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ESG Fund Rating (AAA-CCC) | AAA | AA |
| ESG Quality Score (0-10) | 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Environmental Pillar Score | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Social Pillar Score | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Governance Pillar Score | 6.1 | 5.8 |
| ESG % Coverage | 100.0 | 99.6 |

| Carbon Footprint | Index 1 | Non-ESG Benchmark 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Scope 1 Emissions (tons CO 2 e) | 5,882.8 | 9,222.8 |
| Scope 2 Emissions (tons CO 2 e) | 2,522.8 | 1,977.4 |
| Total Carbon Intensity (tons CO 2 e/USDM) | 61.8 | 167.0 |
| Wtd Avg Carbon Intensity (tons CO 2 e/USDM) | 69.5 | 128.8 |

| Business Screening and Exclusions | Index 1 | Non-ESG Benchmark 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| UN Global Compact Violations | - | 0.6% |
| Civilian Firearms | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Controversial Weapons | - | 0.7% |
| Conventional Weapons | - | 1.7% |
| Nuclear Weapons | - | 2.0% |
| Tobacco | - | 0.7% |
| Thermal Coal | - | 1.4% |
| Oil Sands | - | 0.3% |
| Recreational Cannabis | - | < 0.1% |

| ESG Trend Momentum |
| --- |
| The percentage of companies held by the fund or index that have improved their ESG Rating, (positive), have no change (stable) or worsened (negative) since the previous rating. Trend	Index 1	 Non-ESG Benchmark 1 |
| Positive | 31.1% | 29.5% |
| Stable | 64.0% | 61.0% |
| Negative | 4.7% | 8.6% |
| Unrated | - | 0.3% |

| Corporate Governance	Index 1 |
| --- |
| Board Independence	82.7% |
| Female Directors	35.9% |

| ESG Rating Distribution by Sector 2 | AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB | B | CCC | Not Rated |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Communication Services | 0.4% | 0.4% | 1.3% | 3.2% | - | - | - | - |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.3% | 5.7% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.4% | - | - |
| Consumer Staples | 1.3% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 0.6% | - | - | - | - |
| Energy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Financials | 2.6% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 2.8% | 0.7% | - | - | - |
| Health Care | - | 4.2% | 4.5% | - | 0.3% | - | - | - |
| Industrials | 3.6% | 8.1% | 3.1% | 0.6% | - | - | - | - |
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 7.7% | 4.8% | 4.5% | - | - | - | - |
| Materials | 0.4% | 2.7% | 1.7% | 1.8% | - | 0.4% | - | - |
| Real Estate | 0.3% | 0.7% | 1.6% | 1.1% | - | - | - | - |
| Utilities | 0.2% | 0.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |


## Febelfin Towards Sustainability (Belgium)

## Umweltzeichen (Austria)

## Eurosif Transparency Code (Europe)

Translation (ENIT, 2023-02-28):
# Supplemento ESG
Dati al 28 febbraio 2023
| Profilo ESG | Index 1 | Benchmark non-ESG 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rating fondo ESG (AAA-CCC) | AAA | AA |
| Punteggio qualità ESG (0-10) | 9,2 | 8,3 |
| Fattori ambiental Punteggio Pilastro | 6,2 | 6,1 |
| Sociali Punteggio Pilastro | 5,3 | 5,1 |
| Governance Punteggio Pilastro | 6,1 | 5,8 |
| Copertura % ESG | 100,0 | 99,6 |

| Impronta di carbonio | Index 1 | Benchmark non-ESG 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Emissioni Scope 1 (tonnellate di CO 2 e) | 5.882,8 | 9.222,8 |
| Emissioni Scope 2 (tonnellate di CO 2 e) | 2.522,8 | 1.977,4 |
| Intensità di carbonio totale (tonnellate di CO 2 e/M USD) | 61,8 | 61,8 |
| Intensità di carbonio media ponderata (tonnellate di CO 2 e/M USD) | 69,5 | 128,8 |

| Screening ed esclusioni delle imprese | Index 1 | Benchmark non-ESG 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Violazioni secondo il Global Compact ONU | - | 0,6% |
| Armi da fuoco per uso civile | 0,1% | 0,2% |
| Armi controverse | - | 0,7% |
| Armi convenzionali | - | 1,7% |
| Armi nucleari | - | 2,0% |
| Tabacco | - | 0,7% |
| Carbone termico | - | 1,4% |
| Sabbie bituminose | - | 0,3% |
| Cannabis per uso ricreativo | - | < 0.1% |

| Momentum trend ESG |
| --- |
| La percentuale di aziende detenute dal fondo o dall’indice che hanno migliorato il rispettivo rating ESG (positivo), non presentano modifiche (stabile) o hanno peggiorato (negativo) rispetto alla valutazione precedente. Trend	Index 1	 Benchmark non-ESG 1 |
| Positivo | 31,1% | 29,5% |
| Stabile | 64,0% | 61,0% |
| Negativo | 4,7% | 8,6% |
| Nessun rating | - | 0,3% |

| Corporate Governance	Index 1 |
| --- |
| Indipendenza del CdA	82,7% |
| Amministratori donne	35,9% |

| Rating ESG per settore 2 | AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB | B | CCC | NR |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Servizi di comunicazione | 0,4% | 0,4% | 1,3% | 3,2% | - | - | - | - |
| Consumi discrezionali | 0,3% | 5,7% | 2,4% | 1,2% | 0,7% | 0,4% | - | - |
| Consumi di base | 1,3% | 3,0% | 1,7% | 0,6% | - | - | - | - |
| Energia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Finanziari | 2,6% | 7,0% | 6,0% | 2,8% | 0,7% | - | - | - |
| Cura della salute | - | 4,2% | 4,5% | - | 0,3% | - | - | - |
| Industriali | 3,6% | 8,1% | 3,1% | 0,6% | - | - | - | - |
| Tecnologici | 5,4% | 7,7% | 4,8% | 4,5% | - | - | - | - |
| Materiali | 0,4% | 2,7% | 1,7% | 1,8% | - | 0,4% | - | - |
| Immobiliare | 0,3% | 0,7% | 1,6% | 1,1% | - | - | - | - |
| Servizio pubblico | 0,2% | 0,6% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Altro | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |


## Febelfin Towards Sustainability (Belgio)

## Umweltzeichen (Austria)

## Eurosif Transparency Code (Europa)