it would certainly enough if any were at once named of ni of our want conscious and for this reason he has detailed tbe te ic d to the ii but instead of doing as we hare that he must done it had he with known to lie original place of till of his account has ly the tc that his ii was of s t oi when w n joseph on his r turn from us from going to solely by hia fear of be b� ril e t to hint to proceed to tliat province � an which is unaccountable if the affair of the alone had him to and which is to be explained by the n o� that lie had formerly dwelt there on the other as makes the danger with the of u prophecy the sole cause of the settlement of joseph and at he cannot have supposed that tliis was ir original for in that case would been an decisive cause have other bu the of with m the instance turns upon the impossibility of how the of on their return from have it in contemplation to proceed � second lime to unless f had formerly been heir home the c of accordingly been chiefly applied to the task of finding other for existence of such an inclination in joseph mary such efforts am of a very date holding by ho decidedly to be of the of yet not joseph as a complete cr in for he makes it the place from which he seems i su i that was the dwelling and the of and � c t � to c the ner this n� of points oat source and the of the statements of our two but it la far from a tor m is still supposed to be tlie place which joseph liad his no reason why on hia return t l c all at once to exchange cr for liis c especially as to him the cause of his former journey to not been a of but the a after tlie do longer statement of to the side of and i not i to bring him into with i it wan the source of our two ik u still for how the of ns a dwell ing nor as tlie e of � journey to in the of to which these arc arguing generally on the one hand there arc two on the other an attempt to combine them it is certain that the is not parent and the two former offspring but vice moreover in this department of we have already in witli the learned to or authorities a more at reconciliation is made in � and met with much from modem according to hook the house of va t al and she waa brought up in the temple at and e to she returned after tliis to lier nt in joseph on the contrary not only at as seems to hut also lived there and r brought hia be t hut this mo ie of unlike the other ia le to and to l or the with its circumstances is left out and so because ii joseph were at home in and only went to to fetch his bride the not be as tlie reason he returned to for he would do ie � in tlie ordinary course of after a few days above all had been hia he would not on his arrival have sought an inn where there was no room for him but have token mary under own roof hence modem who wish to avail themselves of the presented by the book and yet to save tlie of i uke fix m maintain that joseph did indeed dwell carry on hia trade in m u � � lo lie j no iv t i ai tbe � vi r � thi i law l u i� if l� v u mil ii n b i i land ri v c� � v r v in h t i� p i and life op but tliat be no of own in that place find the dim sooner than he had bo had not yet provided one but make it not of wore not yet settled n but were not even of there tliat on the con it was intention to depart the shortest e stay great on the part of and mary on tlie hand prefers for the of tiie tn question he tliat h in and could therefore d in but unknown inclined on their return from lo upon until the divine as n thus reason why ic appeared to c rents of ji to settle in hut and supplied his by assuming that it must have seemed to them most for him who was � son of david to be brought up in david s own city here would do well to take for their model the honesty of t and to confess with him tliat of this intention on the part of joseph and tu settle at and of motives whidi induced them to give up the plan knows nothing and that they rest on the authority of alone but what does nt for alleged change of the visit of uie of in dreams � events from serving as proofs of a change of residence on uie part of the of on the other while the author the gospel was probably i of according to to journey to and hence took to be the original residence of the parents of je us tliat may be an essential agreement between the two accounts though agreement did not exist in the of the but once more what cause does lor the journey o the which our previous in shown to be as frail a support for this statement as the and its for that of hero again it b not by admitting tlie of tlie 