 cwg dated NUMBER aNUMBERbNUMBERe URL said from anders eriksson aeriksson fastmail fm date mon NUMBER aug NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER lately i ve got the feeling that exmh is getting slower and slower i just decided to check that vs reality and yes speed has left the scene somewhere between the release of NUMBER NUMBER and now i checked on a number of small messages in a big folder NUMBER msgs the delay of the next button has increased considerably NUMBER NUMBER release NUMBER NUMBER msec latest cvs NUMBER NUMBER msec frankly i think this is getting close to non acceptable since the user settings hasn t changed anybody have any ideas where performance disappeared most likely in the added overhead of managing more sequences i m sure it can be tuned a bunch but as i m leaving for a vacation on friday and have plenty of real work to do i won t be able to do much until i get back i will look at all this when i get back but if you want to check into what s slow and fix things while i m gone my feelings won t be hurt chris just one more info i measured the time spent wrapping the stuff in ftoc_next with time so the data is for real one difference between mine and valdis setup judging from his trace is that i use the address book i ve been doing that for ages so that can t be the problem is there a way to get the log to print time with higher granularity a _______________________________________________ exmh workers mailing list exmh workers URL URL 