daniel quinlan wrote dq before we release it d be great if someone could test a few dq additional score ranges maybe we can lower fps a bit more i don t think there s much more room for lowering fps left which the ga can achieve remember also that the awl will reduce fps but its effects aren t factored in to the ga scores the work currently being done on the ga and comparing different methods of doing the score setting is very worthwhile and extremely useful however we really ought to get a release out since NUMBER NUMBER is getting decreasingly useful as time goes on the fp fn rate of NUMBER NUMBER with pretty well any score setting mechanism will be better than NUMBER NUMBER we can continue with adjusting how the scores are set on the NUMBER NUMBER or NUMBER NUMBER branches dq something like dq dq for low NUMBER low NUMBER low NUMBER dq for high NUMBER high NUMBER high NUMBER dq evolve you could just allow low and high to be evolved by the ga within ranges i d be enormously surprised if it didn t end up with low NUMBER and high NUMBER since that d give the ga the broadest lattitude in setting individual scores the issue with fixing low and high is not one of optimization but rather one of human based concern that individual scores larger than about NUMBER are dangerous and liable to generate fps and individual scores less than NUMBER are dangerous and liable to be forged to generate fns dq maybe even add a nybias loop adding an nybias loop is not worthwhile changing nybias scores will just alter the evaluation function s idea of what the fp fn ratio should be dq afaik there s nothing major hanging out waiting to be checked in dq on bNUMBER_NUMBER_NUMBER is there dq dq nope great dq i ll be on im most of today tomorrow and monday while cranking dq on the next deersoft product release should be a fun one hit dq me at dq dq aim hughNUMBERscr dq icq NUMBER dq msn craig URL dq yim hughescr dq dq we ve been hanging out on irc at URL on spamassassin dq the timezone difference gets in the way though i ve been searching for that but i guess the details of where the channel was got lost in the shuffle c 