 jh they are legally required to do that i got a similar check because an jh insurance company didn t pay a claim quickly enough it might have been jh NUMBER jh although they spent lots more than NUMBER to mail you the check the jh alternative seems to be to keep the money do you really want companies jh to have a financial incentive to over bill you just a bit so they jh could keep it for a company with millions of customers NUMBER customer jh starts adding up christ you sound worse than me what i said in my post john was that instead of having to dole out stupid refunds i d rather they save the costs incurred knock off one of those bullshit surcharges that they inevitably charge for promoting services like these and move on something tells me it d balance out problem is they re silly they don t want to do this and rather than the legislation coming up with an affective means of controlling the situation overcharging they impose silly requirements like this from fork admin URL mailto fork admin URL on behalf of bitbitch URL so i get a check from pac bell today sbc as they re called now turns out they went to the trouble of printing out signing sealing and stamping a check just to refund me for a whole NUMBER NUMBER they easily spent more than this just getting the materials together why the hell do companies bother to do this crap i mean isn t there a bottom line in terms of cost effectiveness i don t think i missed the NUMBER but i sure as hell would have appreciated lower rates in lieu of being returned pennies i m truly stuck on this though i don t know whether to frame the check burn it or cash it in maybe i should find a way to return to sender so they have to spend more money on giving me my NUMBER dues does NUMBER even buy anything anymore funny bit of it is i couldn t even make a phone call these days boggled bb best regards bitbitch mailto bitbitch URL best regards bitbitch mailto bitbitch URL 