UESPWiki:Patrollers/Nominations/Completed/2010b

DKong27

I am nominating myself for Patroller, although I feel it's kinda...crass? But anyway, I have been on the wiki for a while, especially active during periods where I am playing ES games. I have been a User Patroller for a couple months now and know how it works. I know that my non-User and Talk edits are barely above disqualification, but Patrolling is what I do here. I can't say I have the tolerance for long editing sessions of a single page. There's a reason I still have two half-finished mods. But I do spend a lot of time checking Recent Changes. I even got UESPWiki blocked for a few days at school (it was study hall I swear...). I know that I could help with full Patroller status. Thank You. -- DKong27    04:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Votes
Support: Nothing wrong with self-nomination! DKong27 has been on my mental list of potential patrollers for some time. He already does a good job of watching Recent Changes and very often when I find an edit that needs undoing, he's already been there and done it. I'm sure he'll be a huge help to the team. rpeh  09:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: In truth, I thought he already was one. I guess that's one of the minor hazards of having Userspace Patrollers. :)  &ndash; Robin Hood    21:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: Yeah. I thought he was one too ;) He has been doing good work. --Brf 01:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 
Support: Though as I'm apparently inactive, it seems kinda silly to do so...--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        12:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: Looking through his latests edits, I can see no problems. I'm sure he'll make a good patroller. --SerCenKing   23:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: Given I regularly watch the recent changes, I've seen him exhibiting qualities of a patroller. His edits are good and he picks up on errors and questions. I'm sure he would make a fine patroller - Emoboy64 00:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: At first I also thought he was already one. Definitely qualified to be one. --Wizy   06:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: Not much to add, really; DKong27 certainly proved that he is capable of correcting/reverting even complicated edits, while mastering the hard task of being patient and helpful with new editors.  Here’s hoping he doesn’t get hit by the “Now-that-I’m-a-patroller-I-can-easily-leave-the-Wiki”-disease we have seen far too often. --Krusty 11:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Support: After patrolling the myriad of edits the last few days, it would be nice to have another partoller around. -- Jplatinum16 01:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
: CONSENSUS: Support --Krusty 23:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Brf

With his permission, I'm nominating Brf as a patroller. Brf joined in April 2008 but has become particularly active over the last ten weeks, during which time he has made a couple of thousand very useful edits, mainly to the Morrowind namespace. His edits have long passed the point at which I feel it necessary to check them in detail, which is the main test for patroller-ship. As the only regular Morrowind patroller at the moment, I would find it very useful to have an extra, experienced pair of eyes to help keeping things accurate, and Brf definitely fits the bill.

I officially accept this nomination. --Brf 18:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Votes
Support: As nominator. rpeh  18:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: I was just thinking the same thing a couple of days ago.  --GK  19:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: I was the one that nominated Brf for the first time and my vote remains the same, support. --Rigas Papadopoulos  19:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: I'm pretty much helpless when it comes to Morrowind patrolling, and have followed Brf's impressive output for the longest time. No doubt at all; welcome to the team! --Krusty 19:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 

Support: I believe I contacted him about this a while ago. Everything still stands.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        21:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: I might well have supported him the first time were it not for the fact that he was still pretty new and had mostly done link fixes at that point. Now that he's had more experience, and from recent discussion on his talk page, clearly understands what this is all about, he's definitely got my support. I'm sure rpeh will appreciate the help patrolling MW space too!  &ndash; Robin Hood    23:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Support &ndash; No complaints. --Michaeldsuarez   02:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: Morrowind section needs to improve, having a patroller knowledgeable about it will surely help. --Wizy   19:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Support: Nothing to add really, I'm sure he'll make a great patroller. --SerCenKing   20:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

: CONSENSUS: Support. --Krusty 18:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

TheAlbinoOrc

I'd like to nominate myself for Patroller. Since I'm already a UP I have some experience with the general concept of patrolling, and how to put it into practice. Also something I saw in RfA discussions is that various members of the site come up with questions for the person requesting the change in status. Rather than have to anticipate what everyone is going to want to know and answer it in my self-nomination I'd like to implement that here, if there isn't a problem with it. Hopefully this will work out well!--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        03:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Votes
Comment: I'll say again that your last several dozen edits aren't much out of User or talk space, which could be problematic. (Yes, I realize that the same can be said of me) My suggestion is that you withdrawl, and possibly wait about a month, during which you edit like crazy in content space. :) . As I said, this is only my opinion.--    23:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment: I think if you were to withdraw this nomination before any votes have been case, it wouldn't start the "three month clock". rpeh  00:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC) 
Response to AMM: It's true that most of my recent edits have been mainly in User or talk namespaces. But I've been doing things like working on the Ra'jiradh investigation or advancing a new theory for Kurdan. I've also been editing some in content space. See , , Earil's image,  and Tes3Mod:Tamriel Rebuilt/Beasts for some of my recent edits. Also can we leave out edits to Seer? That's something I've been working on when there wasn't really anything else to do. Oh - one more thing can someone please come up with questions like I asked for? I didn't really include much in the nomination because I thought people were going to do that before we moved on to voting.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        01:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment: Well... I actually didn't bring up your fanfic... and there always is something to do here. :) . What questions do you have in mind, exactly? --    01:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC) 
Reply: Sorry about that!. I simply assumed that since you said the last several dozen edits that all of them was what you meant.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        03:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Full Reply: As for the questions I was thinking things like, why do you want to be a patroller, what are your qualifications etc.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        21:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
----
Support: TAO definitely has my support for Patrollership. His edits are well thought out and reliable, and his spelling and grammar are good. I don't really support the whole questions idea, though. The reason we do them for admins is that they have some significant duties and are expected to show a lot of maturity and responsibility. Patrollers don't really need to demonstrate that as much (though they certainly shouldn't be bad examples, either).  &ndash; Robin Hood    09:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 
Reply to RH: The main reason I asked for them was that I didn't want to have to anticipate what people want to know about me. If it's a problem I can try though.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        17:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Support: TAO has shown he's up to the job in the past months, and he's already gotten used to the whole process through UP - so let's give him the extra buttons ;) --SerCenKing   20:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: Carefully took the time to consider this vote; truth is I have two minds on this. While it's clear TheAlbinoOrc is a good editor, I just have seen too a few too many things that worry me slightly. There are the few oversights that seem to suggest TheAlbinoOrc doesn't know (yet) all the necessary workings of this wiki (e.g. like this, patrolling this user page edit or guidelines concerning signatures). Listing minor issues is always troublesome and can give wrong implications. Truth is I would have left the nomination to editors who'd have more concrete things to say, but seeing how only two votes were cast after a week it could be that more editors have difficulty deciding. --Timenn-  20:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 
Comment I'm thinking about withdrawing this since it's tied after a week. Thoughts?--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        20:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
:*Reply: I'd suggest that this is one of those cases where the Recent nomination restriction (> 3 months) shouldn't apply the next time you want to nominate yourself (or someone wants to nominate you), seeing how few votes (with differing opinions) were cast. --Timenn-  20:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 
::*Reply: Also I'm not miscounting the votes here when I say it's tied - Rpeh has said on my talk page that he won't be voting for me as long as I use my current signature.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        21:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
:::*Reply: I concur with both TAO's suggestion and Timenn's response. I think this one kind of got derailed with all the initial commentary, and while I certainly supported your nomination, I would have preferred another month or two of Userspace Patroller experience under your belt.  &ndash; Robin Hood    21:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: I've been thinking about this nomination for a week and I've come down in the "nay" camp. Timenn already gave some concrete diffs, and today's change to a major template made me come off the fence. TAO is on my mental list of editors who will make the grade one day, but that day hasn't come just yet. It's worth mentioning that I would always find it difficult to support an editor who has a signature that doesn't match his or her username. rpeh  21:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: Timenn and rpeh have both put forth very valid arguments regarding why TAO's not ready to be a patroller, and I agree with them.  It, once again, comes down to the fact that TAO's edits still need to be double-checked on a regular basis.  Also, given the extended nature of the nomination and the fact that TAO was given the option to withdraw the nomination before any votes were cast, I'd prefer that the three-month restriction stay in place unless-and-until the community decides in the future that his progress warrants a new nomination before then.  --GK  13:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Conditional Support: I believe that TAO suits for Patroller, but not even one month has passed since he became a UP. I believe he should spent a little more time as a UP and then become a Patroller. However, he seems to known the job and that's why I'm supporting him. --Rigas Papadopoulos  14:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Consensus
:Neutral: In the absence of a clear consensus, no action is taken. The suggestion to skip the three-month waiting period was opposed, so that remains in place, barring a later consensus to override it.


Brf

I'd like to nomitate Brf for patrollership. Now that he's back on the site, he been very active and contributes a lot at Morrowind pages. He is experienced with the Wiki. His maps are good. Therefore, I believe he should be a Patroller. --Rigas Papadopoulos

Votes
Support: For the reasons I mentioned above. --Rigas Papadopoulos 12:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Support:Brf is definitely a good canidate for patroller.--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        15:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: While his map work looks like it will be helpful in the end, he hasn't shown much evidence of watching Recent Changes and hasn't done many things major to help the site - the links are be useful, but aren't exactly a top priority. --    19:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment:Yes but he is adding a lot of links which have to be patrolled. And his edits can be trusted. Why does he have to be patrolling before he's a patroller?--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        19:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
:: Reply: I watch Recent Changes, but I am not familiar with Oblivion, so I have not  attempted to patrol any of those. --Brf 19:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment: TAO: Well, don't forget the title is "Recent Changes Patroller", not "One Step Up Higher Than Normal Editor". My suggestion would be to wait a bit and get involved in patrolling some more, expand your edits (But I'm not saying into other spaces, like Oblivion) but it is just my thought. --    19:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose:Per AMM - great work on the map, but I would like to see more patrolling. That being said, you're definetly on my list of next-to-be patrollers... I'm looking forward to saying "support" the next time round :) --SerCenKing   20:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: This whole nomination should be shut down. The candidate didn't apply for the position, and his one comment so far in this topic shows that there was no real interest in it. Brf has made some really, really useful edits to the Morrowind space and was definitely on my list of people to think about as a future patroller, but this is taking place too soon. Please note that since the nomination took place without asking Brf for his opinion, the three month period wouldn't apply. rpeh  21:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Neutral: I'm saying Neutral only because Brf hasn't yet accepted the nomination, so I dislike the idea of voting either way. I agree with the above comments that Brf looks like he'll be Patroller material, but it's too soon right now.  &ndash; Robin Hood    21:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion: I wholeheartedly agree with rpeh’s comments above. There is something seriously wrong with this nomination, for several reasons. Brf never accepted the nom, nor was he even asked if he was interested beforehand. He just recently returned after a two-year break, which basically means that only a few contributors knows him – and with all due respect, I’m having a very hard time supporting or opposing against an editor I know nothing about. I do know this, however: He makes great edits, he is obviously very knowledgeable about Morrowind (and we could all benefit from a patroller with that knowledge) and he is busy adding useful stuff to the MW namespace. So busy, in fact, that it would be a shame to give him a whole new set of responsibilities at this point. And so busy, that he should simply continue his great work instead of worrying about this nomination. In rpeh’s words, this is taking place too soon. If nobody else objects, I will close down this nomination and also skip the three-month rule, since Brf can’t be blamed for any of this. Like I said, this nomination didn’t follow the proper channels and guidelines, so it’s clearly the best solution. Of course, if Brf decides to accept the nomination, the voting continues. Opinions please. --Krusty 18:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply: Go ahead and shut it down, unless you think it will lessen the work of the existing patrollers in patrolling all my little edits   As you say, I have just gotten back into the game after a two-year hiatus. --Brf 18:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
: Nomination officially closed in agreement with the nominee. No three-month rule in this case. --Krusty 19:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


TheAlbinoOrc (Userspace Patroller)
I would like to nominate myself for Userspace Patroller. Why? Someone needs to start the process and I think I'm up to it. I'm also hoping that this will look good on my nomination for patroller later on, but that's not the main reason :D. The other reason I'm self-nominating is that hopefully it'll draw some attention to this new system.--       13:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Votes
Support: Absolutely no problems here. At the very least it'll be good to see how the new system works. rpeh  14:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Support: Not much to add. TAO is a fine editor and the new system needs to get going. --Krusty 14:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Support: Per rpeh and Krusty. TAO has certainly demonstrated he's up for the job. --SerCenKing   16:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Support... except: I have no problems with TAO becoming a userspace patroller, but this discussion seems to suggest that this isn't the way userspace patrollers would be selected.  I don't think the requirements are even official yet, and we need some sort of article explaining exactly what a "userspace patroller" is.  If, on the other hand, we want to just go ahead and promote TAO and figure out the details as we go along, I don't see a problem with that.  The option is there for admins to assign the right.  I'll start sandboxing something, see if I can come up with a UESPWiki:Userspace Patrollers article as a starting point for some discussion.  --GK  19:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Reply to GK: You're right that based on that discussion this isn't right way to become a UP, but since the discussion sort of died, and no-one was made a UP the way suggested I figured we should do something with it rather than just let it fade into the archives. Besides I wasn't really sure that not holding nominations was the way to go anyway.--       20:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Reply to TAO: I don't think the discussion died at all.  It had been less than a week since I last commented on the proposal when you self-nominated.  I'm not saying you did anything grossly out of line, but the proper course of action would have been to continue the discussion where it was already being held.  That would have assured that it wouldn't "fade into the archives".  On top of all that, if you didn't totally agree with not holding nominations, the proper course of action would have been to say so in the discussion regarding the proposal, not to just go about it an entirely different way.  I have no problem with you being given the rights, and this is only more approval than I had anticipated, so no real harm there, but it just wasn't really the right way to go about it.  --GK  20:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Support: Per everyone else. --    21:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment: If you (TheAlbinoOrc) have concerns about the proposed system at Userspace Patrollers, then it would be much more useful to bring up those concerns as part of the existing discussion.  Ignoring that discussion and instead initiating your own ideas about how to create a userspace patroller is entirely counterproductive.  It leaves us with two different systems for how to proceed, and no way of reconciling the two different systems. I don't even know how to possibly proceed right now with creating a userspace patroller system, if all of these "support" votes are effectively votes against the system discussed on the community portal.  Right now all I see is complete chaos instead of any basis for a new system.  --Nephele  22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment: @Nephele: I wasn't trying to start a new method. I simply saw that while almost everyone was supposed to be added no-one had been. I saw this as a way to boost awareness, and get something done with UPs. The fact that I also voiced concern over the no-nomination method was an aside.--       03:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment: @Nephele: there was absolutely no need to jump on TAO here, nor to make a mountain out of a molehill. Since the requirements for being a UP are so low, does it really matter whether somebody goes through a full, formal procedure or whether it's just a nod from an admin? To flail about and call this "complete chaos" is totally unhelpful and a huge overreaction. TAO was right that, typically, the new proposal had been left in a state of limbo (add their name to the list on what page?) and starting something here at least brought attention to it again. rpeh  08:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Reply to Neph:   For the record, my "support" vote was only intended to make it clear that I had no problems with TAO being given the rights.  I'd much prefer the system you proposed in the initial discussion.  --GK  20:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment: I would prefer TAO's version, in my opinion, it would let the community vote and decide instead of it happening quickly and when they are not present - but the waiting period could be eliminated, and we could judge the closing of the votes when __ people have voted yes or no, as an idea. --    23:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment: As there is general support for TAO's nomination, regardless of the method used (short of a radical change), can I suggest that an Admin grant him the rights and we can delete (not archive) this discussion, since a formal nomination wasn't really called for anyway? If we decide on a nomination-based system later on, we can always archive from the history of this page. That will force any further comments on the proposed system to the Community Portal where they should be.  &ndash; Robin Hood    02:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Support: I strongly support TAO and I believe he is a very good editor. --Rigas Papadopoulos 07:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Comment: It's been more than a week and there haven't been and the consensus was a definite Support. Any reason I haven't been given the rights? Is it just that no one got around to it? Is it that I didn't do this the "right" way? What?--  Ghurhak gro-Demril        20:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

The page is up at , and you're welcome to add yourself to the list there.  That's the consensus from this discussion on the way the "nomination" process will be handled.  --GK  20:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Consensus
:Use   --GK  20:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


Jplatinum16
It's now just over a year since Jplatinum16 started editing regularly and it's been clear for some time that he's been patroller material. Contributions are good, checked, researched and reliable and if it hadn't been for his lack of time a couple of months ago, I'd have nominated him then. It looks like time has become more available so it's time for us to add him to the patrolling team, where I'm sure he'll be of immense help.
I officially accept this nomination -- Jplatinum16 15:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Votes
Support: - as nominator. rpeh  15:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 

Support: Per nomination.--       15:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
:Comment Just to add a bit more to my original vote, he's also willing to take on in-depth research if something seems wrong. See here.--       20:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: When you can create pages this good you are definitely patroller material. --Krusty 15:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Ditto Krusty, not to forget this bit of "magic". Jplatinum has been on my don't-need-to-check-when-patrolling-his-edits list for a while now and I think he'd be a great addition to the team. --SerCenKing   15:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Support &ndash; Agreed with all of the above. --Michaeldsuarez   16:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Support He's on my auto-patrolled list. And the magic he worked from above.--             16:07, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

supportwow jc made the morrowind magic page? definitly a support--  16:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Support Nothing much to add here; the man knows his stuff. Dlarsh  00:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: Another one who's been on my potential-Patroller list for a while.  ‒ Robin Hood    03:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

 *Oppose: I've looking through his contributions to the site in the search for any major ones but the problem is, I couldn't find any. But JP16 would definitely be good for patroller if he was to be nominated again as it would give more time to make more major contributions to the site. (If this nomination fails that is) --         

Comment:''' Er... He made major formatting changes at the very least to the Arcane University which turned it into it's present incarnation as a shining example of how to write many-sectioned place pages. He also made the Magic page for MW, which was quite good when started and has only improved since - those are pretty important aren't they?--       21:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: For reasons given above.  As far as "major" contributions, this edit to OB:Arcane University, mentioned by SerC above, and the creation of this article, mentioned by Krusty above, are two of several examples that can be found.  Along with the great deal of work he's done on Morrowind pages and in the OBNPCRP, I think he's definitely patroller material.  --GK  19:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: JP has definitely made "major" contributions, but even more important than that, he is a great editor and his contributions certainly don't need to be edited by a patroller (except for a minor typo here or there). More than two-thirds of his edits are in the content space and I think he'll make a great addition to the team. Wholehearted support. Vesna 19:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: I recall rpeh bugging Jplatinum16 on this matter before. Back then Jplatinum was quite ready for patrollership, so now that he is willing to accept the nomination I feel that nothing stands in the way. --Timenn-  08:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: Oops, I didn't catch those two edits. After seeing them, I am impressed and have decided to now support his patroller nomination. --         19:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Consensus:
Support.''' --Krusty 13:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)


Corevette789
Since I've been active recently, I kept noticing that Corevette's name kept popping up. Then imagine my surprise when I found out he wasn't even a patroller! I intend to remedy this situation by nominating him for patrollership. Corevette789 has been consistently active for the last year, is polite when talking to other users, has many great edits, already watches the Recent Changes (and probably has been for a long time: this is shown by the large amount of "undo revision" edits on his contributions page), and his work is consistent with the style guide and grammar-wise. I think it's due time we gave him the shortcuts that would make his work easier. 

Additionally, we currently only have 3-4 active patrollers (not including the administrators, who I suspect do a lot of the work). I will also likely disappear as school starts, because I will have to apply to colleges this year. I believe an extra patroller will help us out, and save me some work in patrolling his edits! :) Vesna 02:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I accept this nomination.--             02:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Votes
Strong Support: - as nominator. Vesna 02:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Strong Support: - We need more baby-faced patrollers, and as far as baby-faced editors on UESP go, Core is the most qualified. --Tim   02:26, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Strong Support: - I constantly see him working on some project or another, on top of scrutinizing and tidying edits on the RC. --Riddle 02:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: - as the person who was going to nominate him before Vesna beat me to it. (PS, don't take the lack of "Strong" as an indication of anything other than the fact that I dislike the concept of "Strong" votes.  )  ‒ Robin Hood    04:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC) 

Strong Support I wholeheartedly support this nomination (well support it with the whole part of my heart that is not currently dealing with a law class or a play). He's always polite (even when things are a little out of the ordinary, after all how often is it that someone asks to have their character names translated to Daedric?) already watches the recent changes, is comfortable reverting vandalism, and most importantly (at least to me) his edits can be trusted (see the work done by him for the OBNPCRP for example). Oh, sorry Vesna I didn't mean to use the copy and paste function :D. By the way I always thought of Strong as being more about how hard you are to sway to the opposite viewpoint or at least to neutrality than indicating that that vote has more force than just a Support.--       05:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: I've had my beady eye on Corevette as a potential patroller for some time now and I think the moment has arrived. It'll be good to have another pair of eyes on the Recent Changes page. rpeh  07:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: Absolutely nothing to add, it's all been said. A good, trustworthy editor, who I'm sure will make a great patroller. Not only that, but it's about time I wasn't the youngest patroller around :P (although Vesna may be younger, I don't know xD) --SerCenKing   08:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Corevette789 will definitely be a welcome addition to the team.           09:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support I'm new, but my dealings with Corevette have shown him to be polite and courteous, which can be fairly unusual on wikis! His tone is never curt or short, and he only seeks to help the site Corvus 10:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Strong Support &ndash; Of course. --Michaeldsuarez   14:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Of course Core would be a great patroller!; is there anything more I need to say? -- Jplatinum16 15:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Corevette has really taken the time to understand the wiki and what's expected of Patrollers (plus, I can't think of another editor who's tried so hard for so long to be given the extra responsibilities).  --GK  22:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: No doubt about it, Corevette is the obvious choice. He's been doing it for months anyway, so there's really not much to say - let's just give him the extra buttons! --Krusty 23:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Another support vote from me, though at this point it's more of a formality :) As stated numerous times above, 'Vette more than meets the qualifications to be named a Patroller, and would be a very welcome addition to the team. Dlarsh  18:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Support: Indeed, Corevette789 certainly is excellent patroller material. He keeps a good eye on the recent changes, is friendly, active, good at answering questions and knowledgeable of site policies. He would make a great addition to the team. Kalrot 22:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

supporthe would make a good patroller and i'm suprised that he isn't one. cause i'm sure i've seen a patroller user box on his page though--  16:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 

:*Comment Actually what you saw on his page was a non-patroller userbox most likely.--       16:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Support: At first I had a bit out an outdated image of Corevette's edits. I remember that just too often his corrections of other editors work needed some verification as well. But now that I'm checking Corevette's recent activities I can no longer find such examples, so I'm happy to see his reviewing quality has improved. This is also shows signs of adaptability to me, which I find a very good trait for a patroller. --Timenn-  08:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Consensus
:Support --Krusty 08:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)