UESPWiki:Patrollers/Nominations/Completed/2014

Dominus Arbitrationis (2)
 

The last time I was  nominated, I was told to wait about a month. So, I waited and here I am. :) I would like to inform everyone that with my job becoming much more stable, I will remain active for the foreseeable future, and even on times where I don't make edits, I check the wiki nearly every day. I was also nominated over a year ago, but was refused, primarily on the grounds of I barely met the requirements.  ~     05:05, 16 July 2014 (GMT)
Votes
Oppose: I feel like a broken record opposing this nomination every time it comes around, but I really think Dominus is pushing this nomination before he's really ready for it. A good deal of his newer edits have been minor changes to talk pages, such as marking them unsigned and updating old links, which is fine, although it makes it tough to get a handle on his content edits. Some of his edits are also of the kind that I wouldn't expect patroller applicants to have made so recently, such as marking forum posts unsigned rather than removing them or changing an embed link to the URL when nothing was wrong with the embed link. Some of my private discussions with him have also given me the impression that when he doesn't understand the rationale behind a certain policy, he's quicker to challenge edits in line with that policy rather than to try and understand why the edits were made.
:None of these are capital crimes, obviously; we all make errors like these when we're relatively new. I bring them up to illustrate the point that Dominus is still learning, and I feel that giving him full patroller rights while he's still learning would not only be a mistake for the wiki, but also for his growth as an editor. I think you have a lot of potential, Dom, and I hope you continue to stay around the wiki and learn. You've been significantly more active in the last 3 weeks, and if you can continue to learn and keep that level of activity, I would be glad to approve this nomination in 3 months.      14:01, 16 July 2014 (GMT)

Oppose: While Dominus has become more active on the wiki since his last nomination, I still don't think he is quite ready to be a patroller. Looking at his edits since his last nomination, most of them have been minor edits, undo's, and replies on talk pages. These are all great things as they are some of the more common edits that patrollers have to make or patrol and having a good understanding of these types of edits will make him a better patroller. However, while Dominus shows that he understands how to make these types of edits, I am unable to determine if his content edits are at the same high level of quality that the previously mentioned minor edits are. I'm not suggesting that he should have to be revamping articles or de-stubbing pages, but seeing some smaller content edits (aside from spelling, wording, spacing, etc.) from him would help me know if he is ready to become a patroller. Even if he does not make too many content edits himself, it is still important for him to have an understanding of them so he will be able to make the necessary changes to them in order to mark them as patrolled. If Dominus makes some more content edits and demonstrates an understanding of them more clearly, I think he will have then shown that he more than deserves a spot on the team. Forfeit (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2014 (GMT)

 

Dominus Arbitrationis
 

Over a year ago, Dominus was nominated for patroller and most of the objections stemmed from the fact that he barely met the qualifications. I think we're long past that point now, and Dominus has a history of making some very good edits to a wide variety of articles. In addition, he is courteous and has shown that he can handle conflict well. I think he's overdue to become one of the site's patrollers at this point.
I accept this nomination ~     21:07, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
Votes
Support: As nominator.  &ndash;       21:01, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
Oppose: While he has been very active in recent days, he has been active for less than a week after nearly six months since his last edit. I'd like to see him demonstrate a longer period of consistent activity before becoming a patroller, but if we come back in a month or so and he is still active and editing satisfactorily, I would gladly support it. --AN&#124;L (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
:*Comment: That absence was caused by work issues, which won't happen anymore. (Yay) And it would take three months before I am eligible again. I can assure everyone that I am going to stay active from now on, as well. ~     21:51, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
::*Comment: I have to agree that this is far too soon since you came back. The rules are that a person cannot be nominated for 3 months if they withdraw if votes have been cast. I'd let that slide if this was withdrawn before anyone else officially votes.      21:58, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
:::*Comment: The question is, would that even be appropriate? After all, the policy is rather clear. ~     21:59, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
::::*Comment: It's been done before, and they're more like guidelines anyway.      22:01, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
:::::*Comment: In truth, I hadn't noticed that myself or I would have suggested you wait. As Silencer says, there have been times when we've overlooked minimal voting when some issue was found and the nomination was withdrawn before "significant" voting occurred. If nobody objects, I'd like to suggest that that's what we do here, and Dominus can re-apply in a month or so.  &ndash;       23:10, 13 June 2014 (GMT)
::::::*Comment: I am fine with that. I have contacted Legoless about it as well. ~     06:46, 14 June 2014 (GMT)
Oppose: For much the same reasons as I opposed the nomination last time, I don't think it's appropriate to give patroller status to someone who's been inactive for so much of his time here. As the late Elliot said, this is a wiki where you really need to spend more than the minimal amount of time before you're ready to be a patroller. I haven't noticed any problems with his edits, but the last time he was nominated, concerns were raised that nobody could be sure he was in it for the long haul, and those concerns were validated by the inactivity that occurred shortly after. If Dominus can demonstrate a consistent pattern of good edits for the next few months, I might be willing to support the next nomination, but until we can be sure he's in it for the long haul, I can't in all good conscience support this. ThuumofReason (talk) 00:50, 14 June 2014 (GMT)
 

ThuumofReason
 

A few months ago, I was nominated for this position, but I declined based on some personal factors external to the wiki which were negatively impacting the quality of my editing. These factors made me feel uncomfortable accepting the position at the time, but now that said factors are no longer in place and I have more time to devote to the wiki, I would like to put my name forward again.

As I don't plan on purchasing ESO any time soon, most of my activity would be relating to the three games I'm most familiar with: Skyrim, Oblivion, and Daggerfall. I also can't promise I'd be as active as some of our other patrollers, but I do try to spend at least a little time reviewing recent changes every day. I'm also making more of an effort to not haphazardly butt in to projects I'm unfamiliar with (which I attribute to the aforementioned personal factors). I'd be happy to answer any further questions the community has for me. ThuumofReason (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2014 (GMT)

Support: You definitely know what you're doing on the site. A year ago, I would have opposed a nomination because of your... rough interactions with other users, but you've definitely become a lot more friendly with users. While we all slip and have bad days, myself included, you're doing phenomenal these days, and you're definitely a lot more mature and seasoned as an communicator, in addition to your editing work. Full support from me. -      &hearts;    23:03, 27 May 2014 (GMT)
Support: I've patrolled Thuum's edits for awhile now, and they almost never need any major fixes, adjustments, tweaks, etc. so I don't have any issue with his edits being autopatrolled. I've seen Thuum's rough interactions in a few past discussions, but these were ages ago and I haven't seen anything but friendly help and advice in recent times. On top of all of this, Thuum practically patrols already. I can't really think of any issues that would prevent my support.        23:24, 27 May 2014 (GMT)

Support: I have seen some of Thuum's work on the wiki and must say that I am impressed. I believe he has earned his right to be a patroller. He has proven himself with his work in the wiki. Thank you. Tandil, Master of Restoration (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2014 (GMT)

Support: Finally! --Xyzzy     04:24, 29 May 2014 (GMT)

Support: While I only recently made an account, I've been on this site for a long time and everything I have seen from Thuum has been fantastic. So he has my full support for whatever that's worth. Lorenut (talk) 04:42, 29 May 2014 (GMT)

Support: Thuum is an excellent editor that has been editing for quite some time now and clearly has a strong understanding of the site's policies and style. From what I have seen with his interactions with other users, he has always been very courteous and friendly so I think he sets a good example of how to properly interact with others on the wiki. As for the patrolling side of things, Thuum seems to already be doing the job quite well and giving him the ability to patrol Daggerfall edits (along with his own edits becoming autopatrolled) will be beneficial since not too many of us are knowledgeable about that game. Forfeit (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2014 (GMT)
Comment: I appreciate all of the kind words! I do try very hard to be polite in everything I do, since speaking civilly is key to getting one's point across. I admit that when I first joined, I did have some difficulties in this regard, and I was quick to judge the mistakes of others who weren't familiar with proper editing procedures. For the last year and a half, I've made a conscious effort to be patient rather than judgmental when explaining things, as patient explanations from senior editors were what allowed me to learn when I was new. ThuumofReason (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2014 (GMT)
 

WoahBro
 

With ESO coming out in a handful of days, all hands will be focused on handling the editing surge that comes with the release of any new title. I'd like to do one of my rare nominations, and put forward WoahBro to be the newest addition to the ranks of Patroller. He's a hardworking editor who's been busting his butt working on MWOP, and doing various other things, and he's regularly available in IRC to chat with. In addition to the invaluable help patrolling the Recent Changes that a new patroller would bring us after the release, it would also free our focus on him and his MWOP work to get ESO stuff done if we had his edits autopatrolled. It's a good thing all around to accept him as new patroller.
I'd like to accept this nomination. If anyone has any questions/comments/concerns, feel free to let me know.        01:44, 28 March 2014 (GMT)

Votes
Support: nominator -      &hearts;    01:39, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support:I'm fine with this. --AKB   02:54, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Yep.        02:54, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: He's a skilled editor who knows what he's doing and, looking back at all his edits this year, I see very little wrong with them at all. He may not tend to make major edits, but there's nothing bad about that. I think he'd be useful as a patroller, especially with ESO coming out now.         02:55, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Perfect choice. He has consistently made great contributions across a variety of namespaces while working on various projects. Given that he also watches recent changes very often, I think he will be a perfect addition to the team. Forfeit (talk) 03:50, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: I see nothing in his contribution history to make me doubt that he will make a good patroller. --Xyzzy     04:32, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: I've been watching WoahBro since he first started editing, and he's been at the top of my list of potential patrollers for quite some time. Keep up the good work! •        08:29, 28 March 2014 (GMT)
 

Hargrimm
 

Hargrimm has been editing for a while and I have never once found issue with his edits. He has also been quite active in both the Lore and Online namespaces, both of which are likely to see a large amount of traffic in the next month or so with the upcoming release of Elder Scrolls Online. He knows what he is doing, and isn't afraid to take on hard or complex projects. He also is quite active in IRC, which means he is easy to contact in case anything goes wrong. Also, he is a nice person :P. I think he would be perfect as a Patroller.
I gladly accept this nomination. I'm currently on vacation without my editing references and tools this week, so I haven't been quite as active as usual the past couple days, but I still check RC as often as I can! Of course I will gladly answer any questions anyone has of me. -- Hargrimm  19:55, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Votes
Support: As nominator. Jeancey (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Support:   Wait I want to leave that part out... Anyway, Hargrimm does great work around the wiki, for sure. He has shown a commitment and dedication that is remarkably deserving of patrollership.        20:25, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Sure.      20:27, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Absolutely no problems here. --Alfwyn (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Full support. He's an excellent editor who has made plenty of great edits in the Lore and Online namespaces and also clearly watches recent changes. I think he will be a great addition to the team. Forfeit (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Anyone who can figure out how the Lore pages transclude onto everything else is probably a good candidate for patroller. :)  &ndash;       22:37, 10 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: Definite patroller material. --Xyzzy     06:41, 11 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: 'Bout time I showed my face around here again, and I don't want to upset anyone. Then again I am voting for someone to become a patroller when a new game is coming, in full knowledge of all those red arrows they'll have to face  *cackles* . Now its time to go back to finding faults in all the images.  Good guy, woulda nominated myself if I'd gotten around to it cause he knows lore and how to spell  .       02:00, 12 March 2014 (GMT)
Comment: Would it be possible to wrap this up before the beta starts on Friday. It would be a few days short of the week, but it looks like a walkover so far.      21:07, 13 March 2014 (GMT)
:: As discussed on IRC, if nobody objects to snowballing this, I'll do it in roughly 24 hours unless someone else beats me to it.  &ndash;       21:35, 13 March 2014 (GMT)
Support: No problems whatsoever, and just speed it up if needed. :) --Krusty (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2014 (GMT)
 

Nocte
 

I know this self-nomination will probably come as a surprise to some, and seem bold to others. But it has been my desire ever since I joined the wiki to become a patroller and I hope to reach that dream   That being said I am sure there will be a plethora of questions and I will do my best to anticipate them all in this nomination.
Yes, my activity on the wiki diminished. There were personal matters that kept me occupied and I was unable to devote as much time to the wiki. Those are resolved; I am prepared to be fully active again.
Yes, I had an account which was blocked. However I feel that I have rebuilt enough trust within this community to properly fill the patroller "shoes". 
No, I have not made very many large content-heavy edits. I am better with small grammar and style edits. I am not opposed to diving in game for fact-checking, though, and I am learning my way around CSList and the various Construction tools to be of some use.
There are a few things that I can offer as a patroller:
:#I have solid knowledge of wiki mark-up and style
:#I have ( ) impeccable grammar and spelling
:#I can approach delicate situations with both tact and courtesy
:#I have a general feel for the patrolling process thanks to my time as a User Patroller.
:#I frequent the IRC channel, and thus am easily reached by any user.
:#I learn and adapt to new situations quickly!
Finally, I feel that being given this opportunity will help me grow as an editor and as a person and enable me to better serve the wiki.

I do hope that this is enough to convince you all that I am qualified for this position. I am willing to answer any further questions publicly or privately (depending on what you prefer). Also, while I hope for support from everyone, I will not take it personally if you feel I am unprepared.

Thanks!
       12:54, 9 February 2014 (GMT)

Votes
Support: I worried that I might have too much bias in voting here, but I thoroughly checked his edits and am satisfied with them. While there have been very few content edits since August of last year, the edits before then (and since then, few as they are) show that he's familiar with wiki syntax, grammar, and content. With ESO coming up, we'll need lots of patrollers around, and I believe that Nocte can help out with this, since his activity will be more frequent. I would have preferred to wait and see how his activity will increase, but he'll probably do fine, I think, and I'd rather have him as a patroller before ESO than to wait another three months and miss the start of ESO. So, it's a support from me.         04:16, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: My first thought was "definitely yes", but I then decided to check his recent edits. What I see does give me a little bit of reservation, based on the somewhat low number of namespace edits and the lack of recent activity. He has made only 1 edit of substance since 20 December 2013, and that one was just a single word choice change. Based on this, he doesn't meet the Suggested Qualification of watching the Recent Changes, but this is only a suggested qualification, not a requirement. I'm going to support this nomination because, based on my experience with Nocte and the content edits he has made, he will make a good patroller, and he meets the qualifications. If his nomination is ultimately successful though, I really hope to see his name come up more often on Recent Changes. --Xyzzy     06:54, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: Ultimately it won't be the edits made, but pages patrolled once we are swamped that will count. So while as already mentioned, a bit more activity would have been good, it is not the deciding factor for me, but rather the believe that Nocte will make a good patroller. --Alfwyn (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: I believe that Nocte will make a great patroller.  While he may have few edits, he has shown both competence and great enthusiasm both for the wiki itself and the community, and I'm confident that if elected, his activity will increase.  And if I may add, on a personal note, he smells great. --ADK (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: Apart from the circumstances that led up to Nocte's block, his behaviour has been exemplary. He's shown good knowledge of wiki markup and what is and isn't appropriate content for any given article. With ESO due out shortly, I think a few extra people in support positions is a good idea, and Nocte's a good choice.  &ndash;       02:36, 11 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: Though Nocte's history is slightly worring for me, I believe that sufficient time has passed to show that he doesn't intend to make such a mistake again. Whilst a little bit more recent activity would be nice, I can see the use of having a couple more Patrollers on hand prior to ESO rather than waiting till after like what happened back at Skyrim's release. -- Kiz  21:43, 14 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: I nearly opposed this nomination simply because Nocte had the gall to ask me on our iMessages thread to vote for him when I was describing my escapades in Kerbal Space Program... How inconsiderate of him to always turn the conversation onto himself ;) All kidding aside, he's a good editor. He's met the qualifications to hold the position, and we will have an editing surge as newbies flood the site to give and receive ESO knowledge, and his eyes on the pages wouldn't hurt, especially since I typically see only a small handful of those who used to be here patrolling still around these days. And, in regards to his history, I feel like he's more than made amends for what he's done and it's something behind him that at this point shouldn't really harm his chances as a staffer to the site, given his cooperation and friendliness since then. He's an asset to the site, assuming he actually does work and doesn't lounge around doing nothing like I do. :p -      &hearts;    03:53, 15 February 2014 (GMT)
Support: Nocte is a skilled editor and easy to get along with. I have no problems supporting this nomination. •        02:27, 16 February 2014 (GMT)