Navvye/Olympiad-Problems-CSV huggingface dataset:
Problem: In the polynomial $x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = 0$ , the product of $2$ of its roots is $- 32$ . Find $k$

Solution: We start as before: $ab=-32$ and $cd=62$ . We now observe that a and b must be the roots of a quadratic, $x^2+rx-32$ , where r is a constant (secretly, r is just -(a+b)=-p from Solution #1). Similarly, c and d must be the roots of a quadratic $x^2+sx+62$
Now
\begin{align*}x^4-18x^3+kx^2+200x-1984 =& (x^2+rx-32)(x^2+sx+62)\\  =& x^4+(r+s)x^3+(62-32+rs)x^2\\ &+(62s-32r)x-1984.\end{align*}
Equating the coefficients of $x^3$ and $x$ with their known values, we are left with essentially the same linear equations as in Solution #1, which we solve in the same way. Then we compute the coefficient of $x^2$ and get $k=\boxed{86}.$

Answer:  86
Problem: In the polynomial $x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = 0$ , the product of $2$ of its roots is $- 32$ . Find $k$

Solution: Let the roots of the equation be $a,b,c,$ and $d$ . By Vieta's, \begin{align*} a+b+c+d &= 18\\ ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd &= k\\  abc+abd+acd+bcd &=-200\\  abcd &=-1984.\\  \end{align*} Since $abcd=-1984$ and $ab=-32$ , then, $cd=62$ . Notice that \[abc + abd + acd + bcd = -200\] can be factored into \[ab(c+d)+cd(a+b)=-32(c+d)+62(a+b).\] From the first equation, $c+d=18-a-b$ . Substituting it back into the equation, \[-32(18-a-b)+62(a+b)=-200\] Expanding, \[-576+32a+32b+62a+62b=-200 \implies 94a+94b=376\] So, $a+b=4$ and $c+d=14$ . Notice that \[ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd=ab+cd+(a+b)(c+d)\] Plugging all our values in, \[-32+62+4(14)=\boxed{86}.\]

Answer:  86
Problem: In the polynomial $x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = 0$ , the product of $2$ of its roots is $- 32$ . Find $k$

Solution: Since two of the roots have product $-32,$ the equation can be factored in the form \[x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = (x^2 + ax - 32)(x^2 + bx + c).\] Expanding, we get \[x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = x^4 + (a + b) x^3 + (ab + c - 32) x^2 + (ac - 32b) x - 32c = 0.\] Matching coefficients, we get
\begin{align*}
a + b &= -18, \\
ab + c - 32 &= k, \\
ac - 32b &= 200, \\
-32c &= -1984.
\end{align*}Then $c = \frac{-1984}{-32} = 62,$ so $62a - 32b = 200.$ With $a + b = -18,$ we can solve to find $a = -4$ and $b = -14.$ Then \[k = ab + c - 32 = \boxed{86}.\]

Answer:  86
Problem: In a party with $1982$ people, among any group of four there is at least one person who knows each of the other three. What is the minimum number of people in the party who know everyone else?

Solution: We induct on $n$ to prove that in a party with $n$ people, there must be at least $(n-3)$ people who know everyone else. (Clearly this is achievable by having everyone know everyone else except three people $A, B, C$ , who do not know each other.)
Base case: $n = 4$ is obvious.
Inductive step: Suppose in a party with $k$ people (with $k \ge 4$ ), at least $(k-3)$ people know everyone else. Consider a party with $(k+1)$ people. Take $k$ of the people (leaving another person, $A$ , out) and apply the inductive step to conclude that at least $(k-3)$ people know everyone else in the $k$ -person group, $G$
Now suppose that everyone in the group $G$ knows each other. Then take $3$ of these people and $A$ to deduce that $A$ knows a person $B \in G$ , which means $B$ knows everyone else. Then apply the inductive step on the remaining $k$ people (excluding $B$ ) to find $(k-3)$ people out of them that know everyone else (including $B$ , of course). Then these $(k-3)$ people and $B$ , which enumerate $(k-2)$ people, know everyone else.
Suppose that there exist two people $B, C \in G$ who do not know each other. Because $k-3 \ge 1$ , there exist at least one person in $G$ , person $D$ , who knows everyone else in $G$ . Now, take $A, B, C, D$ and observe that because $B, C$ do not know each other, either $A$ or $D$ knows everyone else of $A, B, C, D$ (by the problem condition), so in particular $A$ and $D$ know each other. Then apply the inductive step on the remaining $k$ people (excluding $D$ ) to find $(k-3)$ people out of them that know everyone else (including $D$ , of course). Then these $(k-3)$ people and $D$ , which enumerate $(k-2)$ people, know everyone else.
This completes the inductive step and thus the proof of this stronger result, which easily implies that at least $1982 - 3 = \boxed{1979}$ people know everyone else.

Answer:  1979
Problem: Let $S_r=x^r+y^r+z^r$ with $x,y,z$ real. It is known that if $S_1=0$
$(*)$ $\frac{S_{m+n}}{m+n}=\frac{S_m}{m}\frac{S_n}{n}$
for $(m,n)=(2,3),(3,2),(2,5)$ , or $(5,2)$ . Determine all other pairs of integers $(m,n)$ if any, so that $(*)$ holds for all real numbers $x,y,z$ such that $x+y+z=0$

Solution: Claim Both $m,n$ can not be even.
Proof $x+y+z=0$ $\implies x=-(y+z)$
Since $\frac{S_{m+n}}{m+n} = \frac{S_m S_n}{mn}$
by equating cofficient of $y^{m+n}$ on LHS and RHS ,get
$\frac{2}{m+n}=\frac{4}{mn}$
$\implies  \frac{m}{2} + \frac {n}{2} = \frac{m\cdot n}{2\cdot2}$
So we have, $\frac{m}{2} \biggm{|} \frac{n}{2}$ and $\frac{n}{2} \biggm{|} \frac{m}{2}$
$\implies m=n=4$
So we have $S_8=2(S_4)^2$
Now since it will true for all real $x,y,z,x+y+z=0$ .
So choose $x=1,y=-1,z=0$
$S_8=2$ and $S_4=2$ so $S_8 \neq 2 S_4^2$
This is contradiction. So, at least one of $m,n$ must be odd. WLOG assume $n$ is odd and m is even. The coefficient of $y^{m+n-1}$ in $\frac{S_{m+n}}{m+n}$ is $\frac{\binom{m+n}{1} }{m+n} =1$
The coefficient of $y^{m+n-1}$ in $\frac{S_m\cdot S_n}{m\cdot n}$ is $\frac{2}{m}$
Therefore, $\boxed{2}$

Answer:  2
Problem: Prove that there exists a positive integer $k$ such that $k\cdot2^n+1$ is composite for every integer $n$

Solution: Indeed, $\boxed{2935363331541925531}$ has the requisite property.

Answer:  2935363331541925531
Problem: Determine all the roots real or complex , of the system of simultaneous equations

Solution: Let $P(t)=t^3-at^2+bt-c$ have roots x, y, and z. Then \[0=P(x)+P(y)+P(z)=3-3a+3b-3c\] using our system of equations, so $P(1)=0$ . Thus, at least one of x, y, and z is equal to 1; without loss of generality, let $x=1$ . Then we can use the system of equations to find that $y=z=1$ as well, and so $\boxed{1,1,1}$ is the only solution to the system of equations.

Answer:  1,1,1
Problem: Determine all the roots real or complex , of the system of simultaneous equations

Solution: Let $a=x-1,$ $b=y-1$ and $c=z-1.$ Then \[a+b+c=0,\] \[a^2+b^2+c^2=0,\] \[a^3+b^3+c^3=0.\] We have \begin{align*} 0&=(a+b+c)^3\\ &=(a^3+b^3+c^3)+3a^2(b+c)+3b^3(a+c)+3c^2(a+b)+6abc\\ &=0-3a^3-3b^3-3c^3+6abc\\ &=6abc. \end{align*} Then one of $a, b$ and $c$ has to be 0, and easy to prove the other two are also 0. So $\boxed{1,1,1}$ is the only solution to the system of equations.

Answer:  1,1,1
Problem: Determine all the roots real or complex , of the system of simultaneous equations

Solution: We are going to use Intermediate Algebra Techniques to solve this equation.
Let's start with the first one: $x+y+z=3$ . This will be referred as the FIRST equation.
We are going to use the first equation to relate to the SECOND one ( $x^2+y^2+z^2=3$ ) and the THIRD one ( $x^3+y^3+z^3=3)$
Squaring this equation: $x^2+y^2+z^2+2xy+2yz+2xz=9$
Subtracting this equation from the 2nd equation in the problem, we have $2xy+2yz+2xz=6$ , so $xy+xz+yz=3$
Now we try the same idea with the cubed terms. Cube the first equation:
$x^3+y^3+z^3+3xy^2+3xz^2+3yx^2+3yz^2+3zx^2+3zy^2=27$ . Plug in $x^3+y^3+z^3=3$ and factor partially:
$3+3(x^2(y+z)+y^2(x+z)+z^2(x+y))+6xyz=27$
Now here is the key step. Note that $z=3-x-y, y=3-x-z, x=3-y-z$ . So we are going to substitute $y+z, x+z, x+y$ for each of the expressions and we get: $-x^3+3x^2-y^3+3y^2-z^3+3z^2=8-2xyz$ (I rearranged it a bit).
Resubstituting in the second and third equation: $-3+3(3)=8-2xyz$ . So $xyz=1$
So now we have three equations for the elementary symmetric sums of $x,y,z$
Equation 4: $x+y+z=3$ (this is also equation 1)
Equation 5: $xy+yz+xz=3$
Equation 6: $xyz=1$
If we call the solutions of $t^3-3t^2+3t-1=0$ (Equation 7) $a,b,c$ , then $x,y,z$ are the three roots $a,b,c$ but in some order. Notice that Equation 7 can be factored as $(t-1)^3=0$ , which means that $t=1$ . Therefore $(x,y,z)$ are permutations of $(1,1,1)$ in some order, which can be only $(1,1,1)$ . (This step uses Vieta's formulas)
Therefore, the only solution is $\boxed{1,1,1}$

Answer:  1,1,1
Problem: Let $\mathbb{N}$ denote the set of positive integers. Find all functions $f : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that for positive integers $a$ and $b,$ \[f(a^2 + b^2) = f(a)f(b) \text{ and } f(a^2) = f(a)^2.\]

Solution: The answer is $\boxed{1}$ , which works.
To show it is necessary, we first get $f(1)=f(1)^2$ , so $f(1)=1$ .
Then, we get $f(2)=f(1^2 + 1^2)=f(1)^2 =1$

Answer:  1
Problem: An empty $2020 \times 2020 \times 2020$ cube is given, and a $2020 \times 2020$ grid of square unit cells is drawn  on each of its six faces. A beam is a $1 \times 1 \times 2020$ rectangular prism. Several beams are placed inside the cube subject to the following conditions:
What is the smallest positive number of beams that can be placed to satisfy these conditions?

Solution: Place the cube in the xyz-coordinate, with the positive x-axis pointing forward, the positive y-axis pointing right, and the positive z-axis pointing up. Let the position of a unit cube be $(x, y, z)$ if it is centered at $(x, y, z)$ . Place the $2020 \times 2020 \times 2020$ cube so that the edges are parallel to the axes, and two of its corners are at $(1, 1, 1)$ and $(2020, 2020, 2020)$ . Now call a beam z-oriented if its endpoints differ only in z-coordinates, and similarly call it x-oriented or y-oriented if the endpoints differ in x- or y-coordinates, respectively.
We claim that the answer is $\boxed{3030}$ . First we will prove 3030 suffices. Place the first beam so its endpoints lie at $(1, 1, 1)$ , and $(2020, 1, 1)$ . Place the 2nd beam so its endpoints lie at $(1, 1, 2)$ and $(1, 2020, 2)$ . Place the 3rd beam so its endpoints lie at $(2, 2, 1)$ and $(2, 2, 2020)$ . Now it is clear that the only faces among these three beams that are not touching the faces of the $2020 \times 2020 \times 2020$ cube of the face of another beam are the top face of beam 2, and the front and right faces of beam 3.

Answer:  3030
Problem: Suppose that $(a_1,b_1),$ $(a_2,b_2),$ $\dots,$ $(a_{100},b_{100})$ are distinct ordered pairs of nonnegative integers. Let $N$ denote the number of pairs of integers $(i,j)$ satisfying $1\leq i<j\leq 100$ and $|a_ib_j-a_jb_i|=1$ . Determine the largest possible value of $N$ over all possible choices of the $100$ ordered pairs.

Solution: Call the pair $(i, j)$ good if $1\leq i < j \leq 100$ and $|a_ib_j-a_jb_i|=1$ . Note that we can reorder the pairs $(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2), \ldots, (a_{100}, b_{100})$ without changing the number of good pairs. Thus, we can reorder them so that $a_1\leq a_2\leq\ldots\leq a_{100}$ . Furthermore, reorder them so that if $a_i=a_j$ for some $i<j$ , then $b_i<b_j$
Now I claim the maximum value of $N$ is $\boxed{197}$ . First, we will show $N\leq 197$

Answer:  197
Problem: Find, with proof, the least integer $N$ such that if any $2016$ elements are removed from the set $\{1, 2,...,N\}$ , one can still find $2016$ distinct numbers among the remaining elements with sum $N$

Solution: Since any $2016$ elements are removed, suppose we remove the integers from $1$ to $2016$ . Then the smallest possible sum of $2016$ of the remaining elements is \[2017+2018+\cdots + 4032 = 1008 \cdot 6049 = 6097392\] so clearly $N\ge 6097392$ . We will show that $N=6097392$ works.
$\vspace{0.2 in}$
$\{1,2\cdots 6097392\}$ contain the integers from $1$ to $6048$ , so pair these numbers as follows:
\[1, 6048\]
\[2, 6047\]
\[3, 6046\]
\[\cdots\]
\[3024, 3025\]
When we remove any $2016$ integers from the set $\{1,2,\cdots N\}$ , clearly we can remove numbers from at most $2016$ of the $3024$ pairs above, leaving at least $1008$ complete pairs. To get a sum of $N$ , simply take these $1008$ pairs, all of which sum to $6049$ . The sum of these $2016$ elements is $1008 \cdot 6049 = 6097392$ , as desired.
$\vspace{0.2 in}$
We have shown that $N$ must be at least $6097392$ , and that this value is attainable. Therefore our answer is $\boxed{6097392}$

Answer:  6097392
Problem: Let $f(n)$ be the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of powers of $2$ , where we keep track of the order of the summation.  For example, $f(4)=6$ because $4$ can be written as $4$ $2+2$ $2+1+1$ $1+2+1$ $1+1+2$ , and $1+1+1+1$ .  Find the smallest $n$ greater than $2013$ for which $f(n)$ is odd.

Solution: First of all, note that $f(n)$ $\sum_{i=0}^{k} f(n-2^{i})$ where $k$ is the largest integer such that $2^k \le n$ .  We let $f(0) = 1$ for convenience.
From here, we proceed by induction, with our claim being that the only $n$ such that $f(n)$ is odd are $n$ representable of the form $2^{a} - 1, a \in \mathbb{Z}$
We induct on $a$ .  It is trivially true for $a = 0$ and $a = 1$ .  From here, we show that, if the only numbers $n \le 2^{a-1} - 1$ where $f(n)$ is odd are of the form described above, then the only numbers $n \le 2^{a} -1$ that are odd are of that form.  We first consider all numbers $b$ , such that $2^{a-1} \le b \le 2^{a} - 2$ , going from the lower bound to the upper bound (a mini induction, you might say).  We know that $f(b) = \sum_{i=0}^{a-1} f(b-2^{i})$ .  For a number in this summation to be odd, $b - 2^i = 2^m -1 \rightarrow b = 2^i + 2^m - 1$ .  However, we know that $b > 2^{a-1}$ , so $m$ must be equal to $a-1$ , or else $b$ cannot be in that interval.  Now, from this, we know that $i < a-1$ , as $b<2^{a} - 1$ .  Therefore, $i$ and $m$ are distinct, and thus $f(b - 2^i)$ and $f(b- 2^{a-1})$ are odd; since there are just two odd numbers, the ending sum for any $b$ is even.  Finally, considering $2^{a} - 1$ , the only odd number is $f(2^{a} - 1 - 2^{a-1})$ , so the ending sum is odd. $\Box$
The smallest $n$ greater than $2013$ expressible as $2^d - 1, d \in \mathbb{N}$ is $2^{11} -1 = \boxed{2047}$

Answer:  2047
Problem: Let $f(n)$ be the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of powers of $2$ , where we keep track of the order of the summation.  For example, $f(4)=6$ because $4$ can be written as $4$ $2+2$ $2+1+1$ $1+2+1$ $1+1+2$ , and $1+1+1+1$ .  Find the smallest $n$ greater than $2013$ for which $f(n)$ is odd.

Solution: Of course, as with any number theory problem, use actual numbers to start, not variables! By plotting out the first few sums (do it!) and looking for patterns, we observe that $f(n)=\sum_{\textrm{power}=0}^{\textrm{pow}_{\textrm{larg}}} f(n-2^{\textrm{power}})$ , where $\textrm{pow}_{\textrm{larg}}$ represents the largest power of $2$ that is smaller than $n$ . I will call this sum the Divine Sign, or DS.
But wait a minute... we are trying to determine odd/even of $f(n)$ . Why not call all the evens 0 and odds 1, basically using mod 2? Sounds so simple. Draw a small table for the values: as $n$ goes up from $0$ , you get: $1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0...$ . We have to set $f(0)=1$ for this to work. Already it looks like $f(n)$ is only odd if $n=2^{\textrm{power}}-1$
The only tool here is induction. The base case is clearly established. Then let's assume we successfully made our claim up to $2^n-1$ . We need to visit numbers from $2^n$ to $2^{n+1}-1$ . Realize that $2^n$ has $0$ for $f$ because there will be two numbers in DS that give a $f$ of one: $2^{n-1}$ and $1$
But to look at whether a value of $f(\textrm{number})$ is 1 or 0, we need to revisit our first equation. We can answer this rather natural question: When will a number to be inducted upon, say $2^n+k$ , ever have a 1 as $f(\textrm{number})$ in the DS equation? Well- because by our assumption of the claim up to $2^n-1$ , we know that the only way for that to happen is if $2^n+k-2^{\textrm{power}}$ in the DS is equal to $2^{\textrm{Some power}} - 1$ . Clearly $1 \leq k \leq 2^n - 1$
Finally, we can simplify. Using our last equation, $2^n+k-2^{\textrm{power}}=2^{\textrm{Some power}}-1$ , regrouping gives $2^n+k=2^{\textrm{power}}+2^{\textrm{Some power}}-1$
Most importantly, realize that $\textrm{power}$ can be from $0$ to $n$ , because of the restraints on $k$ mentioned earlier. Same with $\textrm{Some power}$ . Immediately at least one of $\textrm{power}$ and $\textrm{Some power}$ has to be $n$ . If both were smaller, LHS is greater, contradiction. If both were greater, RHS is greater, contradiction.
Therefore, by setting one of $\textrm{power}$ or $\textrm{Some power}$ to $n$ , we realize $k=2^{\textrm{A certain power}}-1$
The conclusion is clear, right? Each $k$ from $1$ to $2^{n-1}-1$ yields two distinct cases: one of $\textrm{power}$ and $\textrm{Some power}$ is equal to $n$ , while the other is LESS THAN $n$ . But for $k=2^n-1$ , there is ONE CASE: BOTH values have to equal $n$ . Therefore, the only $k$ that has $f(2^n+k)$ as odd must only be $2^n-1$ , because the other ones yield a $f$ of 1+1=0 in our mod. That proves our induction for a new power of 2, namely $n+1$ , meaning that $f(\textrm{number})$ is only odd if $\textrm{number} = 2^{\textrm{Power of two}} - 1$ , and we are almost done...
Thus, the answer is $2^{11}-1=\boxed{2047}$

Answer:  2047
Problem: For distinct positive integers $a$ $b < 2012$ , define $f(a,b)$ to be the number of integers $k$ with $1 \le k < 2012$ such that the remainder when $ak$ divided by 2012 is greater than that of $bk$ divided by 2012.  Let $S$ be the minimum value of $f(a,b)$ , where $a$ and $b$ range over all pairs of distinct positive integers less than 2012.  Determine $S$

Solution: Let $ak \equiv r_{a} \pmod{2012}$ and $bk \equiv r_{b} \pmod{2012}$ . Notice that this means $a(2012 - k) \equiv 2012 - r_{a} \pmod{2012}$ and $b(2012 - k) \equiv 2012 - r_{b} \pmod{2012}$ . Thus, for every value of $k$ where $r_{a} > r_{b}$ , there is a value of $k$ where $r_{b} > r_{a}$ . Therefore, we merely have to calculate $\frac{1}{2}$ times the number of values of $k$ for which $r_{a} \neq r_{b}$ and $r_{a} \neq 0$
However, the answer is NOT $\frac{1}{2}(2012) = 1006$ ! This is because we must count the cases where the value of $k$ makes $r_{a} = r_{b}$ or where $r_{a} = 0$
So, let's start counting.
If $k$ is even, we have either $a \equiv 0 \pmod{1006}$ or $a - b \equiv 0 \pmod{1006}$ . So, $a = 1006$ or $a = b + 1006$ . We have $1005$ even values of $k$ (which is all the possible even values of $k$ , since the two above requirements don't put any bounds on $k$ at all).
If $k$ is odd, if $k = 503$ or $k = 503 \cdot 3$ , then $a \equiv 0 \pmod{4}$ or $a \equiv b \pmod{4}$ . Otherwise, $ak \equiv 0 \pmod{2012}$ or $ak \equiv bk \pmod{2012}$ , which is impossible to satisfy, given the domain $a, b < 2012$ . So, we have $2$ values of $k$
In total, we have $2 + 1005 = 1007$ values of $k$ which makes $r_{a} = r_{b}$ or $r_{a} = 0$ , so there are $2011 - 1007 = 1004$ values of $k$ for which $r_{a} \neq r_{b}$ and $r_{a} \neq 0$ . Thus, by our reasoning above, our solution is $\frac{1}{2} \cdot 1004 = \boxed{502}$

Answer:  502
Problem: Find, with proof, all positive integers $n$ for which $2^n + 12^n + 2011^n$ is a perfect square.

Solution: We will first take the expression modulo $3$ . We get $2^n+12^n+2011^n \equiv -1^n+1^n \pmod 3$
Lemma 1: All perfect squares are equal to $0$ or $1$ modulo $3$ .
We can prove this by testing the residues modulo $3$ . We have $0^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 3$ $1^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 3$ , and $2^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 3$ , so the lemma is true.
We know that if $n$ is odd, $-1^n+1^n \equiv 0 \pmod 3$ , which satisfies the lemma's conditions. However, if $n$ is even, we get $2 \pmod 3$ , which does not satisfy the lemma's conditions. So, we can conclude that $n$ is odd.
Now, we take the original expression modulo $4$ . For right now, we will assume that $n>1$ , and test $n=1$ later. For $n>1$ $2^n \equiv 0 \pmod 4$ , so $2^n+12^n+2011^n=-1^n \pmod 4$
Lemma 2: All perfect squares are equal to $0$ or $1$ modulo $4$ .
We can prove this by testing the residues modulo $4$ . We have $0^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 4$ $1^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ $2^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 4$ , and $3^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ , so the lemma is true.
We know that if $n$ is even, $-1^n \equiv 0 \pmod 4$ , which satisfies the lemma's conditions. However, if $n$ is odd, $-1^n \equiv -1 \equiv 3 \pmod 4$ , which does not satisfy the lemma's conditions. Therefore, $n$ must be even.
However, a number cannot be even and odd at the same time, so this is impossible. Now, we only have to test $n=1$ . We know that $2^1+12^1+2011^1=45^2$ , so the only integer is $\boxed{1}$

Answer:  1
Problem: A permutation of the set of positive integers $[n] = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ is a sequence $(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)$ such that each element of $[n]$ appears precisely one time as a term of the sequence. For example, $(3, 5, 1, 2, 4)$ is a permutation of $[5]$ . Let $P(n)$ be the number of permutations of $[n]$ for which $ka_k$ is a perfect square for all $1\leq k\leq n$ . Find with proof the smallest $n$ such that $P(n)$ is a multiple of $2010$

Solution: We claim that the smallest $n$ is $67^2 = \boxed{4489}$

Answer:  4489
Problem: A permutation of the set of positive integers $[n] = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ is a sequence $(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)$ such that each element of $[n]$ appears precisely one time as a term of the sequence. For example, $(3, 5, 1, 2, 4)$ is a permutation of $[5]$ . Let $P(n)$ be the number of permutations of $[n]$ for which $ka_k$ is a perfect square for all $1\leq k\leq n$ . Find with proof the smallest $n$ such that $P(n)$ is a multiple of $2010$

Solution: This proof can also be rephrased as follows, in a longer way, but with fewer highly technical words such as "equivalence relation":
It is possible to write all positive integers $n$ in the form $p\cdot m^2$ , where $m^2$ is the largest perfect square dividing $n$ , so $p$ is not divisible by the square of any prime. Obviously, one working permutation of $[n]$ is simply $(1, 2, \ldots, n)$ ; this is acceptable, as $ka_k$ is always $k^2$ in this sequence.
Lemma 1. We can permute any numbers that, when each divided by the largest perfect square that divides it, yield equal quantities $p$
Proof. Let $p_k$ and $m_k$ be the values of $p$ and $m$ , respectively, for a given $k$ as defined above, such that $p$ is not divisible by the square of any prime. We can obviously permute two numbers which have the same $p$ , since if $p_j = p_w$ where $j$ and $w$ are 2 values of $k$ , then $j\cdot w = p_j^2\cdot m_j^2\cdot m_w^2$ , which is a perfect square. This proves that we can permute any numbers with the same value of $p$
End Lemma
Lemma 2. We will prove the converse of Lemma 1: Let one number have a $p$ value of $\phi$ and another, $\gamma$ $\phi\cdot f$ and $\gamma\cdot g$ are both perfect squares.
Proof. $\phi\cdot f$ and $\gamma\cdot g$ are both perfect squares, so for $\phi\cdot \gamma$ to be a perfect square, if $g$ is greater than or equal to $f$ $g/f$ must be a perfect square, too. Thus $g$ is $f$ times a square, but $g$ cannot divide any squares besides $1$ , so $g = 1f$ $g = f$ . Similarly, if $f\geq g$ , then $f = g$ for our rules to keep working.
End Lemma
We can permute $l$ numbers with the same $p$ in $l!$ ways. We must have at least 67 numbers with a certain $p$ so our product will be divisible by 67. Obviously, then it will also be divisible by 2, 3, and 5, and thus 2010, as well. Toms as $h$ , in general, we need numbers all the way up to $h\cdot 67^2$ , so obviously, $67^2$ is the smallest such number such that we can get a $67!$ term; here 67 $p$ terms are 1. Thus we need the integers $1, 2, \ldots, 67^2$ , so $67^2$ , or $\boxed{4489}$ , is the answer.

Answer:  4489