NationalLibraryOfScotland/medical-history-of-british-india huggingface dataset:
22
50. A Statement No. 8 is given below in which are shewn the case mortality of
1,467 cases of plague among inoculated persons, according to the period which inter-
vened between inoculation and attack :—
Statement No. 8 showing the Number of Days which elapsed between Inoculation and
Attacks of Plague, with the Results of Attacks in the British Districts of the
Punjab in 1900-01.
Number of days between inoculation and attack.
On 1st day
„ 2nd „
„ 3rd
,,
Within 3 days
...
...
,, 4 ,,
,, 5 ,,
„
6 „
,, 7 ,,
From 4 to 7 days
Within first week
From 8 to 14 days
,, 15 ,, 21 ,,
„ 22 „ 28 „
Within first month
From 29 to 60 days
„
61 „ 90 „
„
91 „ 120 „
Over 120 days
Total
Among those inoculated only during 1899-1900
1900-01
1899-1900 and
1900 of.
Among uninoculated
Among both classes (inoculated and uninocu-
lated).
Attacks of
plague.
1
4
2
7
S
3
1
3
12
19
27
10
17
73
165
434
175
620
1,467
593
496
378
8,441
9,908
Deaths.
2
1
3
...
...
1
1
4
11
4
6
25
64
152
55
238
534
231
188
115
5,008
5,542
Recoveries.
t
2
I
4
5
3
1
2
11
15
16
6
11
48
101
282
120
382
933
362
308
253
3.433
4,366
Ratio of deaths
to attacks.
0 in 1
1 ,, 2
1 „ 2
1 in 2.34
0 „ 5
0 ,, 3
0 „ 1
1
,,
3
1 in 12
I in 4.75
1 ,, 2.45
1 „ 2.50
1 ,, 2.83
1 in 2.92
1 ,, 2.58
1 „ 2.86
1
,,
3.18
1 „ 2.61
1 in 2.75
1 in 2.56
1 ,, 2.64
1 ,, 3.29
1 in 1.69
1 in 1.79
25
Comparison of present epidemic with that of
1897-98.
65. It is with this first epidemic that the present one may be most equitably
compared, for in the outbreaks of 1898-99
and 1899-1900 the organisation for dealing
with plague had attained a greater degree of
perfection, while both the first epidemic and that of the present year was the introduction
of new systems for dealing with plague.
66. To begin this comparison therefore attention may be drawn to the great
difference in the fatality of plague in 1897-98 and in the present epidemic : in the former
year 61 94 per cent. of the attacks proved fatal, while in the present year only
48 46 per cent. of the persons attacked died. These statistics will be considered in fuller
detail presently, but it may be remarked here that the difference is one that cannot be
accounted for by the abolition of cordon, or to the reduction of the staff on plague duty, and
in the absence of other known causes is fairly attributable to inoculation. How much
of this difference is due to the "inoculation campaign" of 1900 and how much to the
inoculations carried out during the present epidemic remains to be considered. It has
been stated that the present epidemic spread beyond the areas to which the disease had
hitherto been confined and to which the "inoculation campaign" of 1900 was restricted. It is
necessary therefore to consider separately the behaviour of the disease within and without
the "inoculated area."
67. Details of plague and inoculations in places respectively within and without the
"inoculated area" are given in Statements A and B already referred to These may be
epitomised for the present comparison as follows, while the same particulars regarding
the epidemic of 1897-98 are also given below :—
Within "inoculated area " ... ...
Without "inoculated area"
...
...
Total
In epidemic of 1897 98
***
***
152
79
231
91
154 670
107 961
262,631
91 892
2,761
1,688
4,449
3,413
1,101
1,055
2,156
2,114
39 88
62 50
48 46
61 94
68. This statement brings to light several striking facts, the following of which
may be considered here. In the first place it will be noticed that in spite of a much wider
spread of plague in the infected area, the number of cases of plague in this area was very
much less in the present than in the first epidemic. In spite, that is to say of the number
of infected villages being more during the present than in the first epidemic by 61,—an
increase of two-thirds,—the cases were less by 652 and the deaths by 1,013.
It will be seen, in the second place, that while the case mortality amounted in
1897-98 to 61 94 per cent, it was only 39 88 per cent. within the "inoculated area" in
1900-01.
The third fact to which it is desired to draw attention here is that the case
mortality without the "inoculated area" compared very closely with that of the epidemic
of 1897-98.
69. As has been previously shewn the abolition of restriction between the inhabit-
ants of healthy and infected villages was likely to facilitate the spread of plague, and as
shewn in the statement just given the number of infected villages in the "inoculated area"
in 1900-01 greatly exceeds that of 1897-98,
27
though it might be expected to affect villages in which previous outbreaks of plague
had occurred, could hardly be expected to operate in villages which had not hitherto
been infected. The statistics concerning previously infected villages should thus be
more favourable than those concerning villages in which outbreaks of plague had
not hitherto occurred. This, however, is not the case, as an examination of the subjoined
statement will show.
Statement No. 10 showing the Incidence and fatality of Plague in Villages in
the "Inoculated Area" in the Jullundur and Hoshiárpur Districts during the
Epidemic of 1900-01.
[ Note.—Statistics concerning places in which only isolated or imported cases of plague occurred have been
Excldued from this statement.]
1
Villages.
1. Previously infected
***
2. Not previously infected ***
Total ***
2
Number.
74
64
138
3
Population.
86,233
59,316
145,549
4
Attacks.
1,706
1,040
2,746
5
Deaths.
684
413
1,097
6
Percentage of at-
tacks to popula-
tion.
1 98
1 75
1 89
7
Percentage of deaths
to population.
0 79
0 69
0 75
8
Percentage of fatal-
ity to attacks.
40 09
39 71
39 95
73. From this statement it will be seen that, although the difference is very
small, the advantage in every particular is on the side of villages in which no previous
outbreaks of plague had occurred. It seems evident therefore that the lessened incidence
and fatality of the disease cannot be attributed to any decrease in its virulence, and in the
absence of any other known factor may fairly be attributed to inoculation.
From what has been written, there can, it is submitted, be little room for doubt
that inoculation was of very great benefit in the epidemic of 1900-01. The question
as to how much of this benefit is due to inoculation performed during the epidemic
and how much to the "campaign " of 1900 is not at all easy to answer. It can hardly be
doubted, however, that to the "inoculation campaign" of 1900 is due the lengthened
freedom from the disease, which has already been referred to or that the mild and
limited nature of the epidemic during the early part of the season was also in a great
measure due to the same cause. The great extent to which inoculation was practised
during the early part of the epidemic increases the difficulty in estimating the effect
of the inoculation campaign of 1900, and the only manner in which such an estimate can
be formed is by noting the incidence and fatality of plague in infected villages in which
inoculations were and were not carried on during 1901.
A Statement No, 11 (attached) has been prepared which shows the particulars-—
both for villages within and in those without the "inoculated area."
28
Statement No. 11 showing the Incidence and Fatality of Plague within and without the Inoculated Area in the Jullundur and Hoshiárpur
Districts between October 1900 and May 1901.
I
Villages.
Infected villages in which 10 per cent. and up-
wards of population was inoculated in
1900-01 prior to outbreak of plague—
(a) Within " inoculated area "
(3) Without " inoculated area "
Infected villages in which little or no in-
oculatiors were performed in 1900-01 prior
to outbreak of plague—
(a) Within " inoculated area "
(b) Without " inoculated area "
2
Number.
62
7
18
12
3
Population.
73.746
6,495
20,665
20,233
4
Number of inoculations
in 1900.
63.879
***
18,831
5
Percentage to popula-
tion.
86 62
...
91 12
***
6
Number of inoculations
i
52,876
5,426
...
***
7
Percentage to popula-
tion.
71 70
83 54
***
***
8
Attacks.
1,511
173
461
768
9
Deaths.
619
94
226
529
10
Percentage of attacks to
population.
2 05
2 66
2 23
3 79
11
Percentage of deaths to
population.
0 84
1 45
1 09
2 61
12
Percentage of fatality to
attacks.
40.97
54 34
49 02
68 88
13
REMARKS.
29
In this statement the condition of villages in which 10 per cent, and over of the
inhabitants were inoculated in 1901 are compared with those in which little or no inocula-
tions were performed during the present plague season. In order to avoid any disturbing
element in the calculation of the incidence and fatality of plague which might be
introduced by the inclusion of villages in which outbreaks of plague occurred during
the hot weather of 1900—only villages the outbreaks in which had ceased by the end of
May are included in this statement. Further, no villages are included in which inoculations
were performed prior to June 1900; in the case of most villages of the "inoculated area "
included in this statement inoculations were performed in July 1900.
74. It will be seen that villages within the "inoculated area" in which inoculations
were carried on in 1901 suffered least of all, that except as regards case mortality
the villages which come next in this respect were those outside the " inoculated
area " of which a large proportion of the inhabitants had been inoculated during
the present season. Of the villages in which no inoculations were performed during the
present season, those situated within the " inoculated area, " suffered less severely than
those outside this area,
ii
APPENDIX I.
STATEMENT A—Shotting Particulars of Plagug Cases and Deaths as well as of Inoculations performed
during 1900-01 in Villages in the "Inoculated Area" of 1899-1900 in the Jullundur and
Hoshiárpur Districts.
I
Serial No.
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I
I
1
I
]
1
1
I
1
1
(
>
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
19
20
2
Name of village.
Mangowál
Mahrámpur (Batulli) ***
Bhukri
Gosal
Chak Kalál
Chahil Kalán
Banga
Kahma
Hakimpur
.
Khán Khanán
Lakbpur
Mokandpur
Rahpa
Khatkar Khurd
Jagatpur
Sukar
Salh Khurd
Bakhlaur
Sindhwán
Soeta
3
***
-
..
••
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
1,357
267
281
494
29:
575
4,888
1,812
850
2,43
45
373
6;
363
1,648
159
1837
1,7
5
4
Inoculation 1899-1900.
9
9
53
48
46
59
37
34
509
1,355
250
267
487
272
507
3788
1,616
785
2,402
45
3,66
54
26
1,483
155
1,635
1,573
4
5
Motion in which majority
of inoculation was per-
formed in 1899-1900.
6
7
Period during which in
oculations were per-
formed.
8
JULLUNDUR DISTRICT.
F
J
2
I
3
6
i
39
35
73
28
February
June ..
May .
June .
May .
July .
June .
March
July
May
July
July
July
May
July
July
June
July
June
July
.
..
..
..
***
..
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
1,479
245
238
400
220
520
3,174
1,318
638
1,647
36
2,313
53
302
1,054
2
136
1,698
I
5
3
2
54
29
36
98
30
Between October 10th
1900, and February
4th, 1501.
11th October 1900 ..
28th November 1900.
3rd December 1900 .
3rd January 1901
23nd January 1901 .
2oth January 1901 .
Between October 4*.
1900, and January
22nd, 1901.
Between January 27
and February 2n
1901.
13th February 1901
26th January 1901
Between January 23rd
and March 8th, 190
28th January 1901
7th January 1901
9th February 1901
14th February 1901
12th February 1901
Between October 9th
1910, and February
21st, 1901.
Between October I
1900, and March 2nd
1901.
11th November 1900
,
.
.
..
***
i.
***
***
***
***
***
,
38
4
1
i
3
(
9
Deaths.
5
4
1
2
8
9
4
11
8
8
56
3
5
41
42
17
19
***
6
2
2
34
c
3
10
3
2
2
1
C
;
)
5
7
3
1
2
I
3
0
13
5
3rd October
1900.
10th Octo-
ber 1900.
7th Novem-
ber 1900.
8th Novem-
ber 1900.
1st January
1901.
9th January
1901.
9th Jan
uary 1901
23rd Jan
uary 1901
2nd Febru-
ary 1901
22nd Feb-
ruary 190
2nd Marc
1901.
6th Marc
1901.
8th Marc
1901.
12th March
1901.
15th March
1901.
Ditto
14th March
1901.
9th March
1901.
1st Mar
1901.
21st Mar
1901.
II
-
.
.
•
•
I
..
cl
33rd April
1901.
t8th May
1901.
27th Novem.
ber 1900.
8th Decem-
ber 1900.
28th Febru-
ary 1901.
J4th Jannary
1901.
21st
April
1901.
3oth Septem-
ber 1901.
23rd March
1901.
23rd
May
1901.
2nd
April
1901.
14th
April
1901.
l6th April
1901.
20th March
1901.
18th
May
1901.
5th
April
1901.
22nd March
1901.
6th
May
1901.
16th
May
1901.
20th April
1901.
ni
STATEMENT A—Showing Particulars of Plague Cates and Deaths as well as of inoculations performed
during 1900-01 in Villages in the "Inoculated Area' 1 of 1899-1900 in the Jullundur and
Hoshiárpur Districts—continued.
1
Serial No.
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
2
Name of village.
Dhandua
Ludhána Uncha
Gunnachaur
Langri Rájpútán
Bains
...
Bháru Masára
Garcha
...
Heon
Mandher
Sarhál Qázián
Mahl Gahla
Kariha
Hamírowál
Salh Kalán
Punián
Pharala
Blka
Dasanjh Raíán
Sotrán
Kháopur
...
3
Population, 1899-1900.
505
1,222
3 33 8
1.163
1,501
598
1,237
1,297
4-9
2050
2,572
1,7'4
93
293
475
2,383
315
2.915
332
654
4
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
493
1,095
2.447
1,124
1,332
484
1,277
1,240
449
1,619
2505
1,707
93
274
414
2,102
224
2,172
305
642
5
Month in which majority
of inoculation was Per-
formed in 1899-1900.
6
Inoculations in 1900-01.
7
Period during which in
oculations were per-
formed.
8
Cases.
JULLUNDUR DISTRICT—CONTINUED.
July
June ...
July ...
July ...
June ...
July ...
June
June
July ...
July ...
June ,..
June ...
July ...
June ...
June ...
June ..,
July
July ...
May ...
July ...
441
11
2,768
1,000
1,153
467
...
got
368
1,331
2,225
1,360
66
4
363
1,737
237
243
269
449
Between December 7th,
1900, and February
14th, 1901.
16th March
1901
Between
November
261h 1910 and Jan-
uary 17th, 1901.
Between December 7th,
1900, and February
14th, 1901.
Between October 10th
1900, and
January
25th 1901.
10th January 1901 ...
...
Between October loth-
'900, and February
11th, 1901.
30th January 1901 ...
On January 31st and
February 1st, 1901.
Between Match 2nd
and 5th, 1901.
Between February 5th
and 7th, 1901.
25th December 1900 ...
12th February 1901
25th December 1900 ...
Between October 10th,
1910, and March nth,
1901.
26th January 1901
31st October 1900
26th December 1900
30th January 1901
19
35
40
41
76
21
92
33
22
35
42
24
4
4
2
54
23
111
17
44
9
Deaths.
11
17
14
18
26
6
24
11
7
17
11
6
3
2
...
28
9
48
3
17
10
Date of first case.
2oth March
1901.
23rd March
1901.
Ditto
24th March
1931.
25th March
901.
Ditto ...
29th March
1901.
Ditto
Ditto ...
Ditto ...
22nd April
1901.
30th March
1901.
19th March
1911.
30th March
1901.'
31st March
1901.
1 in to
2nd
April
1901.
28th March
1901.
4th April
1911.
3rd April
1901.
11
Date of last case.
22nd
April
1901.
22nd June
1901.
7th
May
1931.
18th April
190:.
28th
May
1901.
20th
April
1931.
Ditto.
17th
April
1931.
22nd
April
1901.
13th May
1931.
19th
May
1901.
15th
May
1901
11th April
1901
16th April
1901.
6th
April
1901.
3rd
May
1901.
30th
April
1931.
20th
May
1901.
22nd
April
1901.
19th
April
1901.
iv
STATEMENT A—Showing Particulars of Plague Cases and Deaths as well as of Inoculations performed
during 1900-01 in Villages in the " Inoculated Area " of 1899-J900 in the Jullundur and
Hoshiárpur Districts—continued.
1
Serial No.
41
42
43
44
45
40
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
2
Name of village.
Malla Bedián
Jadía
Jandiála
Bhara Mazára
Khamochon
Chak Mander
Dhan
Ratainda
...
Mazára Nawabad
...
Jindwál
...
Chak Bilgan
Mahl Khurd
Bhut
Rámgarh
Anokharwál
...
Balowál
Ráhon
Dasaunjh
...
Maksúdpur
...
Tahírpur
Bahádurpur
3
Population, 1899-1900
827
3.373
856
789
931
231
483
1.359
584
683
825
600
749
190
597
528
8,512
654
373
520
836
4
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
814
2,830
691
788
832
92
478
1,010
564
656
798
598
723
151
596
454
7,816
638
334
374
785
5
Month in which majority
of inoculation was per-
formed in 1899-1900.
6
Inoculations in 1900-01.
7
Period during which in
oculations were per-
formed.
8
Cases.
JULLUNDUR DISTRICT—CONTINUED.
July
July
June ...
July ...
June
July
March
July
June ...
June ...
July ...
June ...
March
July ...
June ...
July ...
July
March
June ...
July ...
July ...
588
2,009
843
562
656
26
462
999
498
391
738
...
525
18
488
390
546
313
382
...
22nd February 1901
Between October 10th,
1910, and February
25th, 1901.
Between November 3rd,
1900, and February
21st, 1901.
25th February 1901
26th February 1901 ...
15th October 1900 ...
15th January 1901 ...
1st February 1901
Between January 11th,
and 17th, 1901.
4th January 1901
Between December 7th,
1900, and February
14th, 1901.
...
23rd January 190I ...
11th November 1900...
13th March 1901
3rd February 1901 ...
...
9th January 1901
...
15th February 1901 ...
8th March 1901
...
45
50
27
28
14
1
8
63
14
31
24
19
18
7
6
26
43
8
9
12
15
Deaths.
21
29
8
10
S
...
6
27
5
12
12
7
9
4
1
8
26
S
7
4
6
10
Date of first case.
6th
April
190t.
7th
April
T90I.
8th
April
190t.
9th
April
1901.
Ditto ...
Ditto ...
10th April
1901.
Ditto
Ditto ...
nth April
1901
9th
April
2901.
13th April
1901.
14th April
1901.
13th
April
1901.
15th April
1901.
4th
April
1901.
16th April
1901.
Ditto ...
17th April
1901.
Ditto ...
19th April
1901.
II
Date of la
27th April
1901.
6th
June
1901.
12th May
1901.
22nd May
1901.
12th
May
1901.
9th
April
1901.
31st
May
1901.
6th
May
1901.
8th
May
1901.
4th
June
1901.
17th
June
190T.
4th
May
1901.
22nd May
1901.
3rd
June
1901,
28th
April
1901.
9th May
1903.
27th
June
1901.
16th May
1901.
1st May
1901.
25th
May
1901.
2nd
May
1901.
v
STATEMENT A—Showing Particulars of Plague Cases and Deaths as well as of Inoculations performed
during 1900-01 in Villages in the" Inoculated Area" of 1899-1900 in the Jullundur and
Hoshiárpur Districts—continued.
1
Serial No.
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
?2
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
2
Name of village.
Kajla
Gadáni
Talwandi Fattu
Ferozepore
Sarhál Mandi
Mahrámpur
Reti
Bahrám
Súndh
Rasúlpur
Lehl
Dhodhála
Usmánpur
Bahr Mazára
Bahroli
Mírpur Lakha
Kultham
Músápur
Surápur
Happowál
Bahrwál
Kalerán
3
Population, 1899-1900.
450
411
978
239
851
605
1,823
961
746
489
400
750
703
930
471
1,456
1,782
868
563
682
879
4
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
440
372
865
210
I3S
583
1,762
948
622
377
382
641
690
817
427
1,430
1,662
714
563
676
869
5
Month in which majority
of inoculation was per-
formed in 1899-1900.
6
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
JULLUNDUR
May ...
June ...
July
July ...
July ...
March
May ...
June ...
June
July
July
July ...
July ...
June ...
July ...
July ...
June
July ...
June ...
May
June
370
338
778
146
726
16
1,388
846
487
246
3
33
364
776
987
1,214
556
407
480
689
7
Period during which in-
oculations were per-
formed.
8
Cases.
DISTRICT—CONTINUED.
4th January 1901
14th February 1901 ...
14th April
1901.
14th February 1901
1st March 1901
17th October 1900
Between October 25th,
1900, and January
18th, 1901.
Between October 10th,
1900, and April 29th,
1901.
5th February 1901
1st March 1901
2nd October 1900
nth November 1900
21st January 1901
On February 18th and
19th. 1901.
16th November 1900
Between October 10th,
1900, and January
30th, 1901.
8th February 1901
7th March 1901
9th January 1901
7th January 1901
10th January 1901
3
15
7
15
15
58
10
11
13
8
18
15
1
23
21
2
50
18
16
4
9
9
Deaths
I
3
1
7
8
33
6
2
7
4
6
11
1
6
13
1
15
7
3
3
3
10
Date of first case.
19th April
1901.
15th April
1901.
20th April
1901.
18th April
1901.
20th April
1901.
3rd April
1901.
21st April
1901.
Ditto
22nd April
1901.
Ditto ...
24th April
1901.
Ditto ...
25th April
1901.
23rd April
1901.
2Sth April
1901.
Ditto ...
26th April
1901.
27th April
1901.
Ditto ...
24th April
1901.
28th April
1901.
II
Date of last case.
23rd May
1901.
3rd
May
1901.
17th May
1901.
22nd May
1901.
23rd
June
1901.
20th May
1901.
Ditto.
18th May
1901.
31st May
1901.
17th
June
1931.
13th
May
1901.
31st
May
1901.
26th April
190I.
21st May
1901.
13th June
1901.
15th May
1901.
25th May
1901.
24th
Jane
1901.
4th
June
1901.
25th
May
1901.
24th M ay
1901.
vi
STATEMENT A—Showing Particulars of Plague Cases and Deaths as well as of Inoculations performed
during 1900-01 in Villages in the "Inoculated Area" of 1899-1900 in the Jullundur and
Hoskiárpur Districts —continued.
1
Serial No.
33
84
85
So
87
88
39
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
2
Name of village.
Mandhiáli
Jhingrán
Katt
Chahl Khurd
Bharta Kalán
Malpur Reti
Laroa
Garhi Ajit Singh
Langroa
Parágpur
Mazára Kalár
Sadhpur
Sahlon
Thandián
Mallúpota
Cheta
Nágra
Báia
Kangror
Rámráripur
3 Chak Ramon
3
Population, 1899-1900.
1,660
1,137
682
S22
772
535
505
1,016
1,851
440
429
831
881
655
1,187
298
253
217
858
842
66c
4
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
1,103
1,004
659
518
719
481
467
899
1,735
435
386
783
847
636
1,096
254
236
213
662
714
525
5
Month in which majority
of
inoculation was per-
formed in 1899-1900.
6
Inoculation, 1899-1900.
7
Period during which in
oculations were per-
performed.
8
Cases.
JULLUNDUR DISTRICT—CONTINUED.
July ...
July ..,
July ...
June
July ...
June ...
July
July
une ...
July
July
July
July ...
April
May
June ...
May ...
June ...
June ..
July ..
July
1,009
954
639
433
589
3
839
1,321
284
413
429
826
258
214
810
521
558
22nd February 1901 ..
13th December 1900 ...
15th February 1901
12th February 1901
...
12th March 1901
16th November 1900...
26th February
1901
Between October 6th,
1900, and February
20th, 1901.
...
22nd February 1901 ...
nth February 1903 ...
...
1st March 1901
5th January 1901
1st March 1901
19th January
1901
...
Between October roth
1900, and March 2nd
1901.
Between October 1st
1900, and March 6th
1901.
16th Februry 1901
21
8
24
2
23
10
19
18
37
18
15
19
41
18
11
4
1
2
2
15
1
9
Deaths.
13
3
15
...
4
4
7
11
14
1
7
6
18
4
6
• ••
1
5
2
10
Date of first case.
29th April
1901.
Ditto ...
20th April
1901.
29th April
190t.
1st
May
1901.
30th April
1901.
29th April
1901.
1st
May
1901.
2nd
May
1901.
Ditto ...
3rd May
1901.'
Ditto ...
27th April
1901.
4th
May
1901.
5th
May
1901.
9th
May
1901.
8th
May
1901.
Ditto ...
2nd M a y
1901.
9th
May
1901.
13th May
1901.
11
Date of last case.
29th
July
1901.
10th
May
1901.
30th
May
1901.
10th
May
1901.
20th June
190Ï'
24th
May
1901.
11th
May
1901.
28th
May
1901.
20th
June
1901.
30th
June
1901.
24th
May
1901.
Ditto.
5th
June
1901.
11th
June
1 1901.
16th
May
1901.
31st
May
1901.
8th
May
1901.
Ditto.
22nd May
1901.
28th
May
1901.
13th June
1901.