NationalLibraryOfScotland/medical-history-of-british-india huggingface dataset:
25
prevent, as far as could be, cruelty to male bovines who
were, previously, emasculated by "mulling". Any one
who has witnessed "mulling" could not but be repelled
by the horror of it. It has, however, crept into belief that
the intention of the department was to improve breeding
by the emasculation of bulls and not to prevent cruelty.
93. The Indian farmer wants a castrated bovine with
such muscular development as will enable him to pull a
plough or cart. I, therefore, quite agree with him when
he says that he does not want castration of bovines to be
done before the age of 2½ years (Berar), 4½ years (Chhat-
tisgarh) or 4 to 5 years (in Nerbudda and the north).
When one realizes that the earliest potential sexual
age of a bull is about 15 months, it becomes obvious that
castration, in itself, will not improve the breed of animals.
The subordinate officers have therefore been instruct-
ed to encourage farmers to separate masculine bovines
from herds containing cows, and to concentrate on castra-
tion by western methods with a view to eliminate cruelty
only.
94. The officers of the department are frequently
asked whether their work is being appreciated by the
cultivators, or, perhaps more crudely, is the Veterinary
Department making any advance and is it worth the money
spent on it.
In order to satisfy what is, after all, a very legitimate
curiosity a statement is given below, showing a comparison
of the work done ten years ago, five years ago and in the
year under report:—
Number of assistants ...
Number of dispensaries ...
Number of inoculations ...
Number of cases treated (dis-
pensaries and on tour).
Number of castrations
Number of specimens examined
Number of Trypan blue injec-
tions.
Number of H. S. inoculations
(vaccine).
Number of B. Q. inoculations
(aggressin).
1918-19.
121
80
73,848
1,17,683
4,405
1,562
Nil.
Nil.
Nil.
1923-24.
120
87
23,244
2,75,847
22,492
14,790
2,437
Nil.
Nil.
1928-29.
127
100
2,74,073
3,87,295
64,483
34,270
29,149
36,088
26,326
26
95. During the year the department has had
numerous references made to it in the press of the
province. Although these references have been mainly
in the nature of more or less severe criticism of the admin-
istration and usefulness of the department, they have been
welcomed as a most encouraging and healthy sign.
96. When inspecting certain dispensaries in the
province it has been noticed that, for years past, some
have not been visited either by revenue officers or the
representatives of local bodies. This is a great pity.
Nothing gives more encouragement to most Veterinary
Assistant Surgeons than a visit from someone outside the
department.
A Veterinary Assistant Surgeon will often
quote, and sometimes at too great a length, what the
Deputy Commissioner had said to him, and about his
work, for months and sometimes years after the event.
97. Thanks are due to the Commissioners and
Deputy Commissioners for the many helpful suggestions
made by them at the time of forwarding the divisional and
district annual reports, all of which have been carefully
noted for action where and when possible.
98. When I come to the paragraph dealing with
persons whose good work it is desirous to bring before the
Local Government, I am in a difficult position. It would
be easier for me to mention those who did not work well.
They can be counted on one's fingers. When it was
necessary to stop all leave almost all the officers of all
grades accepted the necessity.
Some few, of course,
immediately produced medical certificates, but it is hardly
necessary to say that they were not usually men of out-
standing ability.
I express my thanks to all the Deputy Superintendents,
Veterinary Inspectors, Veterinary Assistant Surgeons,
Touring Veterinary Assistant Surgeons and others of 100
dispensaries who, when the condition of grave cattle
disease was explained to them, so loyally rallied together
and, at some sacrifice of their own personal affairs, saved
the province from a much worse outbreak.
Mr. Pillai, as already mentioned, did excellent work
in stemming the advance of rinderpest in the Nagpur
district when Nagpur itself was threatened.
27
C. V. Nayudu, my camp clerk, gave me great
assistance during this time and despite long weary
journies was always alert and willing.
Mr. N. Basavaraju, assisted by the office staff, did
very good work during a year when the volume of corre-
spondence was exceptionally large.
99. The names of the following officers are brought
to the notice of the Local Government: —
Deputy Superintendent ...
Offg. Veterinary Inspector
Veterinary Assistant Sur-
geon.
„ „ ...
„ „ ...
„ „ ...
„ „ ...
„ „ ...
Muhammad Abdul Kadir.
M. W. Rahalker.
N. S. Jawade.
Gopalkrishnan.
S. A. Miyan.
Irshad Ali.
Ramaswamy.
Abdul Hafiz Khan.
100. In conclusion I beg to thank, on behalf of
Mr. Wilson and myself, all those Heads of Departments,
District Officers, and officials and non-officials of local
bodies who have helped the department during the year.
I have the honour to be,
SIR,
Your most obedient servant,
R. F. STIRLING, MAJOR,
Offg. Veterinary Adviser to Government,
Central Provinces.
I
APPENDIX A.
Number of cattle disease reports received and attended during the
year 1928-29.
Ser i al No.
1
1
2
3
4
5
Name of district.
2
Nagpur ...
Wardha ...
Chanda ...
Bhandara ...
Balaghat ...
Carried over ..
Number of reports.
Re-
ceived.
3
458
135
188
289
221
1,291
De-
tected.
4
82
71
61
29
44
287
Total.
5
540
206
249
318
265
1,578
Number of reports
attended.
By
Vete-
rinary
Ins-
pec-
tors.
6
29
8
7
27
35
106
Vete-
rinary
Assist-
ant
Sur-
geons.
7
511
198
242
291
230
1,472
Total.
8
540
306
249
318
265
1,578
Num-
ber
of
re-
ports
re-
main-
ed
unat-
tend-
ed.
9
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
10
28 reports were attended
by
the
Veterinary
Inspector,
Nagpur,
independently,
and
1 report was attended
by Veterinary Inspector,
Nagpur, conjointly with
Veterinary
Assistant
Surgeons, Nagpur.
4 reports were attended
by
the
Veterinary
Inspector,
Nagpur,
independently, and 4
reports were attended by
the Veterinary Inspector,
Nagpur,
conjointly
with Veterinary Assist-
ant Surgeons.
4 reports were attended
by Mr. M. W. Rahalkar
Veterinary
Inspector,
Chanda, independently,
and
3 reports were
attended by Mr. M. W.
Rahalkar,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Chanda,
conjointly with Veteri-
nary Assistant Surgeons.
21 reports were attended
by Mr. J. M. Bhatt,
Veterinary
Inspector,
independently, and 6.
reports were attended
by him conjointly with
Veterinary
Assistant
Surgeons.
25 reports were attended
by Mr. I. M.
Bhatt,
Veterinary
Inspector,
independently, and 10
conjointly with Veteri-
nary Assistant Surgeons.
2
APPENDIX A.
Number of cattle disease reports received and attended during the
year 1028-29—contd.
Ser i al No.
1
6
7
8
9
10
11
Name of district.
2
Brought forward
Raipur ...
Bilaspur ...
Drug
Jubbulpore ..
Damoh ..
Saugor ...
Carried over
Number of reports.
Re-
--ived.
3
1,291
1,052
472
711
315
327
566
4,734
De-
ected.
4
287
116
85
144
48
19
121
820
Total.
5
1,578
1,168
557
855
363
346
687
5,554
Number of reports
attended.
By
Vete-
rinary
Ins-
pec-
tors.
6
106
75
26
13
45
2
73
340
By
Vete-
rinary
Assist-
ant
Sur-
geons.
7
1,472
1,087
529
813
310
344
614
5,169
Total.
8
1,578
1,162
555
826
355
345
687
5,500
Num-
ber
of
re-
ports
re-
main-
ed
unat-
tend-
ed.
9
6
2
29
8
...
...
45
Remarks.
10
34 reports were attended
by Mr. K. B. Pillai,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Raipur,
independently,
and 41 reports were
attended by Mr. K. B,
Pillai, Veterinary In-
spector,
Raipur,
conjointly with Veteri-
nary Assistant Surgeons.
26 reports were attended
by Mr. R. K. Sanyal.
Veterinary
Inspector,
Bilaspur, independently.
13 reports were attended
by Mr. R. K. Sanyal,
Veterinary
Inspector.
Bilaspur, independently.
45 reports were attended
by Mr. L. M.
Roy,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Jubbulpore,
independ-
ently.
2 reports were attended
by
Mr. Shaukafali,
Officiating,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Saugor,
independently.
28 reports were attended
by
Mr.
Shaukatali,
Officiating
Veterinary
Inspector,
Saugor,
independently, and 45
reports were attended
by Mr. J. M. Biswas,
Officiating
Veterinary
Inspector,
Saugor,
independently.
3
APPENDIX A.
Number of cattle disease reports received and attended during the
year 1928-29—contd.
Serial No.
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Name of district.
2
Brought forward
Mandla ...
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ...
Seoni ...
Chhindwara ...
Nimar ...
Carried over ...
Number of reports.
Re-
ceived.
3
4,734
181
178
32
346
558
339
286
6,654
De-
ected.
4
820
51
34
177
57
91
68
83
1,381
Total.
5
5,554
933
212
209
403
649
407
369
8,035
Number of reports
attended.
By
Vete-
rinary
Ins-
pec-
tors.
6
340
15
4
2
27
113
2
24
527
By
Vete-
rinary
Assist-
ant
Sur-
geons.
7
5,169
217
208
207
376
513
399
345
7,434
Total.
8
5,509
232
212
209
403
626
401
369
7,961
Num-
ber
of
re-
ports
re-
main-
ed
unat-
tend-
ed.
9
45
...
...
...
...
43
6
...
74
Remarks.
10
15 reports were attended
by
Mr.
Ishaq
Mahommed, Veterinary
Inspector,
indepen-
dently.
4 reports were attended
by Mr. S. S. Iyer,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
2 reports were attended
by the Veterinary In-
spector,
Jubbulpore,
conjointly with Veteri-
nary Assistant Surgeons.
27 reports were attended
by Mr. S. S. Iyer,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Hoshangabad, indepen-
dently.
115 reports were attend-
ed by Mr. K.
S.
Prakash,
Officiating
Veterinary Inspector,
Satpura
Division,
independently.
22 reports were attended
by Veterinary
In-
spector, Nimar district,
independently,
and a
reports were attended,
by Veterinary Inspector
Nimar
district, con-
jointly with Veterinary
Assistant Surgeons.
4
APPENDIX A.
Number of cattle disease reports received and attended during the
year 1928-29—concld.
Serial No.
1
19
20
21
22
Name of district.
2
Brought forward
Akola ...
Amraoti ...
Buldana ...
Yeotmal ...
GRAND TOTAL ...
Number of reports.
Re-
ceived.
3
6,654
328
348
510
210
8,050
De-
tected.
4
1,381
87
104
100
75
1,747
Total.
5
8,035
415
452
610
285
9,797
Number of reports
attended.
By
Vete-
rinary
Ins-
pec-
tors.
6
527
12
18
55
14
636
By
Vete-
rinary
Assist-
ant
Sur-
geons.
7
7,434
403
424
555
271
9,087
Total.
8
7,961
415
452
610
285
9,723
Num-
ber
of
re-
ports
re-
main-
ed
unat-
tend-
ed.
9
74
...
...
...
...
74
Remarks.
10
3 reports were attended
by the Veterinary In-
spector, Akola, indepen-
dently, and 9 reports
were attended by the
Veterinary
Inspector,
Akola, conjointly with
Veterinary
Assistant,
Surgeons.
28 reports were attended
by Mr. Hemraj Singh,
Veterinary
Inspector,
Amraoti, independently,
and 7 reports were
attended by Veterinary
Inspector, Amraoti, con-
jointly with Veterinary
Assistant Surgeons.
55 reports were attended
by Mr. V. P. Sane, Offg.
Veterinary
Inspector,
Buldana, independently.
2 reports were attended
by Mr. N. S. Pathak,
independently, and 12
reports were attended
by Mr. Abdul Rahman
independently.
TABLE II.—Cancelled.
6
TABLE
Showing results of preventive
Province.
1
Nagpur ...
Wardha
...
Chanda ...
Bhandara ...
Balaghat ...
Seoni ...
Chhindwara ...
Jubbulpore
...
Saugor ...
Damoh ...
Mandla ...
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ...
Nimar ...
Raipur ..
Drug
Bilaspur ...
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Amraoti ...
Yootmal ...
Telenkheri and Maharaj Bagh
Total
Name of
disease
against
which
inocula-
tion
was
carried
out.
2
Rinder-
pest.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
..
Method
of
inocula-
tion
followed.
3
Serum
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Number
of out-
breaks in
which
inoculation
was
under-
taken.
4
42
2
13
72
66
56
13
90
76
37
22
41
54
10
13
224
195
88
31
14
6
41
...
1,206
Number of animals which died
noculated in course of outbreak
Equines.
5
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
6
121
27
112
668
665
282
58
822
496
259
288
153
287
39
164
1,609
1,500
578
184
52
22
276
...
8,672
Others.
7
RIN
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
7
No. III.
inoculation during the year 1928-29.
Number of animals inoculated.
Equines.
8
DERPEST.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
Bovines.
9
8,514
(a) 1,105
(b) 2,425
(c) 7,362
(d) 5,185
(e) 8,515
1,289
10,216
11,686
4,848
2,340
(f) 7,470
7,858
(g) 1 436
1,852
(h) 34,911
(i) 26,461
(j) 9,968
(k) 5,379
1,098
1,710
(l) 8,526
999
171,153
Others.
10
...
...
...
85
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
65
Number of animals which died
after inoculation.
Equines.
11
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
Bovines.
12
...
...
7
...
58
...
...
2 2
20
...
20
...
7
...
...
66
10
23
3
...
...
...
...
236
Others.
13
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
14
(a) Out of these 162 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Nagnur.
(b) Out of these 250 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Chanda.
(c) Out of these 804 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Gondia.
(d) Out of these 105 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Gondia.
(e) Out of these 2,944 inocu-
lated by
Veterinary
In-
spector, Seoni.
(f) Out of these 686 inocu-
lated
by
Veterinary
Inspector, Hoshangabad.
(g) Out of these 27 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
(h)
3,708
by
Veterinary
Inspector, Raipur.
(i)
785
by
Veterinary
Inspector, Drug.
(j)
511
by
Veterinary
Inspector, Bilaspur.
(k) Out of these 1,735 by
Veterinary Inspector, Akola,
conjointly with Veterinary
Assistant Surgeons.
(l) Out of these 379 by Veteri-
nary Inspector, Yeotmal.
8
TABLE
Showing results of preventive inoculation
Province.
1
Nagpur ...
Jubbulpore ...
Betul ...
Raipur ...
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Amraoti ...
Total ...
Nagpur ...
Wardba
...
Chanda ...
Bhandara
...
Jubbulpore ...
Saugor ...
Damoh ...
Mandla ...
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ...
Njmar ...
Raipur ...
Drug
Akola ...
Buldana
...
Amraoti ...
Yeotmal ...
Telenkheri and Maharaj Bagn
Total ...
Name of
disease
against
which
inoculation
was
carried
out.
2
Anthrax
„
„
„
„
„
„
..
Hæmor-
rhagic
Septicæ
mia.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Method
of
inocula-
tion
followed.
3
Serum
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Serum
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Number
of
outbreaks
in
which
inoculation
was
undertaken.
4
1
4
3
2
1
2
1
14
9
1
4
7
3
1
6
3
8
5
...
2
1
6
12
4
15
15
...
102
Number of animals which died
uninoculated in course of outbreak.
Equines.
5
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
1
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1
Bovines.
6
5
21
22
8
1
3
3
62
Others.
7
ANTH
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
HÆMORRHAGIC
81
6
50
17
12
...
46
20
36
83
...
13
5
25
75
28
50
206
...
753
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
2
...
2
9
No. III.
during the year 1928-29—contd.
Number of animals inoculated.
Equines.
8
RAX.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
SEPTICÆMIA.
...
...
...
3
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
3
Bovines.
9
28
320
(a) 126
335
149
(b) 155
85
1,198
1,245
100
102
(a) 805
288
(b) 40
732
197
608
545
(c) 1,146
131
298
1,046
(d) 1,101
192
(e) 5,123
2,140
...
15,839
Others.
10
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
97
100
...
197
Number of animals which died
after inoculation.
Equines.
11
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
12
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
5
...
1
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
6
Others.
13
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
14
(a) Out of these 20 inoculated
by Veterinary Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
(b) By Veterinary Inspector
conjointly.
(a) Out of these inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Gondia.
(b) Inoculated by Veterinary
Inspector, Saugor.
(c) Out of these 30 inoculated
by Veterinary
Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
(d) Out of these 78 inoculated
by Veterinary Inspector,
Akola.
(e) Out of these 804 conjointly
with Veterinary Inspector,
and
720 by
Veterinary
Inspector, Akola.
10
TABLE
Showing results of preventive inoculation
Province.
1
Nagpur ...
Wardha ...
Chanda ...
Bhandara ...
Balaghat ...
Seoni ...
Chhindwara ...
Jubbulpore ...
Mandla ...
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ..
Nimar
...
Raipur ...
Drug ...
Bilaspur ...
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Amraoti ...
Yeotmal ...
Telenkheri
and
Maharaj
Bagh.
Total ...
Name of
disease
against
which
inoculation
was
carried
out.
2
Hæmor-
rhagic
Septicæ-
mia.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Method
inocula-
tion
followed.
3
Vaccine
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
.
Number
of
outbreaks
in which
noculation
was
under-
taken.
4
...
...
...
20
6
...
...
24
5
..
4
...
3
22
20
5
38
27
...
21
...
195
Number of animals which died
uninoculated in course of outbreak.
Equines.
5
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
6
Others.
7
HÆMORRHAGIC
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
11
No. III.
during the year 1928-29—contd.
Number of animals inoculated.
Equines.
8
Bovines.
9
SEPTICAEMIA.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1,477
1,035
(a) 2,543
(b) 2,055
974
(c) 1,369
372
3,176
371
(d) 3,117
552
1,335
376
(e) 2,129
(f) 2,153
515
(g) 3,069
3,522
(h) 3,241
(i) 3,245
461
36,085
Others.
10
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
3
...
3
Number of animals which
died after inoculation.
Equines.
11
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
.
...
Bovines.
12
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1
...
...
1
Others.
13
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
14
(a) Out of these 215 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Chanda.
(b) Out o1 these 582 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Gondia.
(c) Out of these 523 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector.
Seoni.
(d) Out of these 409 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
(e) Out of these 648 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Raipur.
(f) Out of these 372 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Drug.
(g) Out of these
148
by
Veterinary Inspector, Akola,
conjointly with Veterinary
As istant Surgeons.
(h) Out of these 49 conjointly
with
Veterinary
Inspector
and
470
by
Veterinary
Inspector Amraoti.
(i) Out of these 384 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Yeotmal.
12
TABLE
Showing results of preventive inoculation
Province.
1
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Wardha ...
Nagpur ...
Bhancara ...
Nimar ...
Hoshangabad ...
Saugor ...
Seoni ...
Jubbulpore ...
Amraoti ...
Yeotmal ...
Chanda ...
Damoh ...
Betul ...
Narsinghpur ...
Raipur ...
Drug ...
Bilaspur ...
Telenkheri and Maharaj
Bagh.
Total ...
Chhindwara ...
Saugor ...
Hoshan abad ...
Betul ...
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Amraoti ...
Yeotmal ...
Total ...
Name of
disease
against
which
inoculation
was
carried
out.
2
Hæmor-
rhagic
Septicæ-
mia.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Black
quarter.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Method
of
inocula-
tion
followed.
3
Serum and
Vaccine
simulta-
neous.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Serum
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
...
Number
of
outbreaks
in
which
inoculation
was
undertaken.
4
35
19
11
2
1
8
3
2
5
3
13
6
...
2
17
1
3
5
2
...
138
2
7
2
1
2
2
1
1
18
Number of animals which died
uninoculated in course of outbreak
Equines.
5
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
....
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
Bovines.
6
Others.
7
HÆMORRHAGIC
206
85
104
7
...
41
15
35
23
18
33
7
...
4
35
7
13
20
6
...
659
12
66
6
3
3
12
9
2
113
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
BLACK
...
... ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
13
No. III.
during the year 1928-29.—contd.
Number of animals inoculated.
Equines.
8
Bovines.
9
SEPTICAEMIA.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
QUARTER.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
(a) 4,426
1,952
986
911
(b) 120
(c) 1,828
344
207
(d) 561
236
(e) 3,672
991
478
276
(f) 894
50
(g) 603
512
927
396
20,460
160
890
200
60
80
(a) 81
168
60
1,600
Others.
10
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
Number of animals which died
after inoculation.
Equines.
11
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
Bovines.
12
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
2
...
...
... ...
...
...
...
...
...
2
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Others.
13
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
14
(a) Out of these 100 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Akola, conjointly with Vete-
rinary Assistant Surgeons.
(b) Out of these 60 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Gondia.
(c) Out of these 223 inocula-
ted by Veterinary Inspector,
Nimar.
(d) Out of these 118 inocula-
ted by Veternary Inspector,
Seoni.
(e) Out of
these 265 by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Amraoti, and 304 conjointly
with Veterinary Inspector.
(f) Out of these 98 by Veteri-
nary Inspector,
Hoshang-
abad, and 218 conjointly with
Veterinary Inspector.
(g) Out of these 97 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector
Raipur.
(a) Out of these 40 inoculated
by Veterinary
Inspector,
Buldana.
14
TABLE
Showing results of preventive inoculation
Province.
1
Nagpur ...
Wardha ...
Chanda ...
Bhandara ...
Balaghat ...
Seoni ...
Chhindwara ...
Jubbulpore ...
Mandla ...
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ...
Akola
Buldana
Amraoti ...
Yeotmal ...
Telenkheri and Maharaj Bagh
Total ..
Seoni ...
Jubbulpore ...
Saugor .
Mandia .
Hoshangabad ...
Narsinghpur ...
Betul ...
Nimar
Akola ...
Buldana ...
Amraoti .
Total ..
Name of
disease
against
which
inoculation
was
carried
out.
2
Black
quarter.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
..
Black
quarter.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
Method
of
inoculation
followed.
3
Aggressin
alone.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
Aggressin
and serum
simul-
taneous.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
Number
of
outbreaks
in
which
inoculation
was
undertaken.
4
...
... 6
2
...
...
5
3
...
3
...
41
20
...
24
...
109
...
5
5
2
5
4
3
4
23
26
1
78
Number of animals which died
uninoculated in course of outbreak
Equines.
5
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
6
..
...
...
...
...
... ...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
27
34
2
39
32
23
46
138
177
6
583
Others.
7
BLACK
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
15
No. III.
during the year 1928-29—contd.
Number of animals inoculated.
Equines.
8
QUARTER.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
9
930
421
698
485
660
362
455
187
117
(a) 591
757
1,381
2,908
(b) 1,629
(c) 1,862
(d) 4,952
140
18,535
...
180
503
50
556
425
349
266
2,603
2,515
52
7,783
Others.
10
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
8
...
...
...
8
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Number of animals which died
after inoculation.
Equines.
11
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bovines.
12
...
...
..
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
4
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
4
Others.
13
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Remarks.
14
(a) Out of these 23 inoculated
by
Veterinary
Inspector,
Hoshangabad.
(b) Out of these 82 inoculated
by Veterinary
Inspector,
Buldana, conjointly.
(c) 280 by Veterinary Inspec-
tor, Amraoti, and 49 conjointly
with Veterinary Inspector.
(d) Out of these 985 inoculated
by Veterinary
Inspector,
Yeotmal.