NationalLibraryOfScotland/medical-history-of-british-india huggingface dataset:
TABLE
PROVINCIAL
Services and produce of each class of Donkey Stallions the property of
SOUTH
CLASS OF DONKEY
STALLION.
Italian
—
Persian
—
Home—bred
—
TOTAL —
DISTRICT BOARDS.
Stallions on Register.
2
2
2
6
Donkey stallions
actually employed
at stud.
For
mule—
breed-
ing.
Year under report
1
2
2
5
Previous year
—
2
2
4
For
donkey—
breed—
ing.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Number of
mares covered.
Pony
mares
Year under report
9
79
58
14
Previous
year
—
134
53
237
Donkey
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
9
3950
20
2920
Previous year
—
9200
2650
5925
Donkey
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Result of previous year's
coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number
of mule
produce
—
23
10
33
Number not held
—
50
24
74
Number not known
—
111
10
130
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce
—
—
—
——
Number not held
—
—
—
—
Number not known
—
—
—
—
Average result of
previous year's coverings
per stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
—
1150
5
8.25
Average of not held
—
25
12
1850
Average of not known
—
5350
9.50
3250
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
—
—
COURTS
Stallions on Regi s t
er
—
—
—
—
Donkey stallions
actually
employed at stud.
For
mule—
breed-
ing.
Year under report
1
—
—
1
Previous year
1
—
—
1
For
donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
J Previous year
—
—
—
—
Number of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
74
—
—
74
Previous year
103
—
—
103
Donkey
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
civ
J.
REPORT.
District Boards, Courts of Ward, and private persons during 1897—98.
PUNJAB.
OF
WARD.
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year
under report
74
—
—
4
Previous year
103
—
—
103
Don—
key
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce
64
—
—
64
Number not held
30
—
—
30
Number not known
9
—
—
9
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce
—
—
—
—
Number not held
—
—
—
—
Number not known
—
—
—
—
Average result of
previons year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
64
—
—
64
Average of not held
30
—
—
30
Average of not known
9
—
—
9
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
—
—
PRIVATE PERSONS.
St al l
i
ons on Register
—
—
—
—
Donkey
stallions
actually
employed
at stud.
For
mule-
breed-
ing.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Tor
Donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Number of
mares
covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Average
of mares
covered per
stallion
employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report
—
—
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce
—
—
—
—
Number not held
—
—
—
—
Number not known
—
—
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce
—
—
—
—
Number not held
—
—
—
—
Number not known
—
—
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
—
—
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
—
—
cv
TABLE
PROVINCIAL
Services and produce of each class of Donkey Stallions the property of
CENTRAL
CLASS OF DONKEY
STALLION.
Italian
—
Persian
—
&c.,
&c.,
—
Total
—
DISTRICT BOARDS.
Stallions on Register.
1
1
Donkey stallions
actually employ-
ed at stud.
For
mule-
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
1
1
Previous year.
1
1
For
donkey-
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Number of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
39
39
Previous year.
62
62
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
39
39
Previous year.
62
62
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Result of previous year's
coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule pro—
duce.
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number
of
donkey
produce.
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
Average result of previous
year's coverings per stallion
employed at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule pro-
duce.
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey pro-
duce.
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
Average of not known.
—
—
COURTS
Stallions on Register.
—
—
Donkey stallions
actually
employed at stud.
For
mule-
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
For
donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Number
of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
cvi
J.—continued.
REPORT.
District Boards, Courts of Ward, and private persons during 1897—98.
PROVINCES.
OF WARD
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Don—
key
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce.
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce.
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares
Average of mule
produce.
—
Average of not held.
—
—
Average of not known.
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey-
produce.
—
Average of not held.
—
Average of not known.
—
PRIVATE
PERSONS.
Stallions on Register.
—
—
Donkey
stallions
actually
employed
at stud.
For
mul e—
breeding.
Year under report.
—
Previous year.
—
For Don-
key
breeding.
Year under report.
—
Previous year.
—
Number of
mares
covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report.
—
Previous year.
—
Average
of mares
covered per
stallion
employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report.
—
Previous year.
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares
Number
of mule
produce.
—
—
Number not held.
—
Number not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce.
—
—
Number not held
—
Number not known.
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares
Average of mule
produce.
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
Average of not known.
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce.
—
Average of not held.
—
Average of not known.
—
—
cvii
TABLE
PROVINCIAL
Services and produce of each class of Donkey Stallions the property of
BURMA
CLASS OF DONKEY
STALLION.
Italian
—
Persiau
—
&c., &c.,
—
TOTAL
—
DISTRICT BOARDS.
Stallions on Regi s t
er .
2
2
Donkey stallions
actually employed
at stud.
For
mule—
breed-
ing.
Year under report
2
2
Previous year
2
2
For
donkey—
breed—
ing.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Number of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
2
2
Previous year
6
6
Donkey
mares.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
1
1
Previous year
3
3
Donkey
mares.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Result of previous year's
coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce
—
—
Number not held
3
3
Number not known
3
3
Donkey
mares.
A umber of donkey
produce
—
—
Number not held
—
—
Number not known
—
—
Average result of
previous year's coverings
per stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
—
—
Average of not held
1.5
1.5
Average of not known
1.5
1.5
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
COURTS
St al l
i
ons on Regi s t
er
—
—
Donkey stallions
actually
employed at stud.
For
mule—
breed-
ing.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
For
donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under report
—
—
Provious year
—
—
Number of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
cviii
J.
REPORT
District Boards, Courts of Ward, and private persons during 1897—98.
OF WARD.
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce
—
—
Number not held
—
—
Number not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce
—
—
Number not held
—
—
Number not known
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
PRIVATE PERSONS.
Stallions on Register
—
—
Donkey
stallions
actually
employed
at stud.
For
mule—
breed-
ing.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
—
—
For
Donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under r epor t
Previous year
—
—
Number of
mares
covered.
Pony
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Average
of mares
covered pet
stallion
employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year
under report
—
—
Previous year
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number
of mule
produce
—
—
Number not held
—
—
Number not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce
—
—
Number not held
—
—
Number not known
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce
—
—
Average of not held
—
—
Average of not known
—
—
cix
TABLE
PROVINCIAL
Services and produce of each class of Donkey Stallions the property of
TOTALS
CLASS OF DONKEY
STALLION.
Italian
—
Persian
—
Country-bred
—
Punjabi
—
Home-bred
—
Cyprians —
Total —
DISTRICT BOARDS.
Stallions on Register.
3
5
1
1
3
—
13
Donkey stallions
actually employ-
ed at stud.
For
mule-
breed-
ing.
Year
under report.
2
4
1
1
2
—
11
Previous year.
1
4
1
—
3
—
9
For
donkey-
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number of
mares
covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
48
81
4
—
103
—
238
Previous year.
62
190
45
—
97
—
394
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
24
20.2
4
—
35
—
21.0
Previous year.
62
47.5
45
—
32.3
—
43.7
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Result of previous year's
coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule pro-
duce.
—
23
18
—
18
—
59
Number not field.
—
53
18
—
58
—
129
Number not known.
—
114
9
—
21
—
144
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number
not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average result of previous
year's coverings per stallion
employed at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of donkey
duce.
—
5.75
18
—
6
—
6.53
Average of not held.
—
1325
18
—
19.3
—
14.3
Average of not known
—
28.5
9
—
7
—
16
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey pro-
duce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
COURTS
Stallions on Register.
—
2
—
3
1
2
8
Donkey stallions
actually
employed at stud.
For
mule-
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
1
2
—
3
1
2
9
Previous year.
1
2
—
3
1
1
8
For
donkey
breed-
ing.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number
of
mares covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
74
2
—
56
—
4
136
Previous year.
103
—
—
—
—
—
103
Donkey
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
cx
J.—concluded.
REPORT.
District Boards, Courts of Ward, and private persons during 1897-98.
OF WARD.
Average of mares
covered per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
74
1
—
18.6
—
2
17
Previous year.
103
—
—
—
—
—
11.4
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce.
64
—
—
—
—
—
64
Number not held.
30
—
—
—
—
—
30
Number not known.
9
—
—
—
—
—
9
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce.
64
—
—
—
—
—
8
Average of not held.
30
—
—
—
—
—
3.75
Average of not known.
9
—
—
—
—
—
1.12
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey.
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
PRIVATE PERSONS.
Stallions on Register.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Donkey
stallions
actually
employed
at stud.
For
mule-
breeding.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
For Don-
key
breeding.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number of
mares
covered.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average
of mares
covered per
stallion
employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Year under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Don-
key
mares.
Year
under report.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Previous year.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Result of previous
year's coverings.
Pony
mares.
Number of mule
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number
not known
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Number of donkey
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not held
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average result of
previous year's
coverings per
stallion employed
at stud.
Pony
mares.
Average of mule
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Donkey
mares.
Average of donkey
produce.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not held.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Average of not
known.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
cxi
TABLE K.
Cost of feed, keep, attendants, &c., of Donkey Stallions, the property of Provincial
Governments, District Boards, Courts of Ward, and private persons, shown under
separate heads during 1897—98.
Province.
North—Western Provinces & Oudh
North Punjab
South Punjab
...
Central Provinces ...
Burma ...
District.
Provincial Government.
Babugarh Depot ...
Courts of Ward Estates.
Barabanki ...
Bareilly ...
Gorakhpur ...
Total
Private persons.
Busti ...
District Boards.
Gujrat ...
Dera Ismail Khan ...
Total ...
District Boards.
Delhi ...
Multan ...
Gurgaon ...
Hissar ...
Total ...
Court of Ward.
Jallalabad (Mamdot Estate)
Local Government.
Saugor ...
District Boards.
Myelat ...
Mone ...
Total ...
Number
of
Donkey
stallions or
days.
365
365
1,095
365
1,825
365
39
365
404
730
365
144
365
1,604
249
365
365
365
730
Total annual
cost.
Rs.
64
150
701
205
1,056
122
40
183
223
409
170
40
125
745
102
271
221
246
468
A.
2
1
3
3
7
4
0
12
12
12
0
3
1
0
15
12
10
7
1
P.
9
0
6
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
9
0
0
3
3
Average
per Donkey
stallion.
Rs.
64
150
233
205
211
122
374
183
202
204
170
101
125
169
150
271
221
246
234
A.
2
1
1 1
3
4
4
5
12
2
14
0
13
1
8
15
12
10
7
0
P.
9
0
10
0
8
0
8
0
4
3
0
9
0
11
4
0
0
3
7
Remarks.
ABSTRACT.
Provinces.
North—Western Provinces & Oudh
North Punjab ..
South Punjab ..
Central Provinces ...
Burma ..
Provincial
Governments.
Year under
report.
64 2 9
...
...
271 12 0
..
Previous
year.
Not shown
separately.
..
..
400 1 0
..
District Boards.
Year under
report.
..
202 2 4
169 8 11
..
234 0 7
Previous.
year.
..
218 1 9
175 8 10
..
209 15 6
Courts of Ward.
Year under
report.
211 4 8
..
150 15 4
..
..
Previous
year.
Not shown
separately
..
Not shown
separately
..
..
Private Persons.
Year under
report.
122 4 0
..
..
..
..
Previous
year.
Not shown
separately
..
..
...
..
cxii
TABLE L.
PROVINCIAL REPORT.
Breeders' and other Colts castrated by Veterinary Assistants and Salutris paid
from Local Funds, in 1897—98.
Province.
North—Western Provin-
ces and Oudh.
North Punjab ...
District.
Dehra Dun ...
Saharanpur ...
Muzaffarnagar ...
Meerut ...
Bulandshahr ...
Aligarh ...
Moradabad ...
Budaon ...
Bareilly ...
Shahjehanpur ...
Agra...
Naini Tal ...
Etawah ...
Rai Bareilly ...
Sitapur ...
Banda ...
Benares ...
Total ...
Kohat ...
Hazara ...
Rawalpindi ...
Jhelum ...
Gujrat ...
Gujranwala ...
Shahpur ...
Sialkot ...
Lahore
Jhang ...
Baunu ...
Dera Ismail Khan ...
Total ...
Number of Colts
castrated.
Hor s e stock.
2
14
14
22
27
3
22
10
7
5
2
8
3
0
3
2
0
144
0
7
16
27
45
33
88
112
61
17
4
32
442
Mule stock.
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
3
8
4
0
2
6
2
0
0
0
27
Total.
2
14
15
22
27
3
22
10
7
5
2
8
3
0
3
2
0
145
0
9
19
35
49
33
90
118
63
17
4
32
469
Number of deaths resulting from
effects of castration.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS.
Also 1 Bull.
„ 1 Dumba.
„ 5 Bulls.
„ 2 Bulls.
„ 6 Bulls, 5 Buck Goats and
3 Rams.
1 Bull.
3 Bulls.
27 other animals.
10 Colts castrated by Imperial
Veterinary Assistants.
34
Do.
Do.
11
Do.
Do.
48
Do.
Do.
94
Do.
Do.
23
Do.
Do.
59
Do.
Do.
34
Do.
Do.
313
Do.
Do.
cxiii
TABLE L.—concluded.
Breeders' and other Colts castrated by Veterinary Assistants and Salutris paid
from Local Funds, in 1897—98.
Province.
South Punjab ...
Baluchistan ...
Central Provinces ...
Madras ...
District.
Amritsar ...
Gurdaspur ...
Hoshiarpur ...
Jullunder ...
Ludhianah ...
Ferozepore ...
Muzaffargarh ...
Multan ...
Delhi
Gurgaon ...
Kurnal ...
Umballa ...
Rohtak ...
Hissar ...
Montgomery
Kangra ...
Dera Ghazi Khan ...
Jellalabad (Mamdot Estate)
Total ...
Quetta ...
Thal Chotiali ...
Total ...
Nagpur ...
Raipur
...
Wardha ...
Total ...
Salem ...
Coimbatore ...
Total ...
Number of Colts.
castrated.
Hor s e stock.
29
32
17
3
76
71
3
76
4
8
9
9
1
6
6
1
0
98
449
26
27
53
4
2
1
7
258
62
310
Mul e stock.
1
0
2
5
8
6
1
0
0
0
12
0
0
2
0
0
0
12
49
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tot al .
30
32
19
8
84
77
4
76
4
8
21
9
1
8
6
1
0
110
498
26
28
54
4
2
1
7
258
52
310
Number of deaths resulting from
effects of castration.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS.
18 Colts castrated by Imperial
Salutris.
11
Do.
Do.
77
Do.
Do.
12
Do.
Do.
50
Do.
Do.
29
Do.
Do.
73
Do.
Do.
19
Do.
Do.
3
Do.
Do.
14
Do.
Do.
294
Do.
Do.
600
Do.
Do.
3 head of other stock.
3
Do.
Do.
6
Do.
Do.
Also 2 Buck Goats.
2 Buck Goats.
cxiv
TABLE M,
TABLE M.
PROVINCIAL REPORT..
Showing Districts where Outbreaks of Cattle—disease occurred during 1897—98.
PROVINCE.
North—Western Provinces
and Oudh.
DISTRICT.
Almora ..
Aligarh ..
Agra ..
Allababad ..
Banda ..
Bareilly ..
Bulandshahr ..
Bara Bauki ..
Benares ..
Bijnour ..
Badaun ..
Babraich ..
Cawnpore ..
Dehra Dun ..
Etah ..
Etawah ..
Farrukhabad ..
Fyzabad ..
Fatehpore ..
RINDERPEST.
Number attacked.
..
23
23
165
3,304
08
453
440
1,425
93
345
..
34
227
267
22
1,103
702
680
Number died.
..
20
11
113
1,051
65
166
116
921
26
168
..
22
112
168
2
604
419
346
Percentage of deaths.
..
87.3
47.82
68.5
50.11
66.32
36.64
26.18
64.63
28
48.69
..
64.7
49.34
62.84
9.09
45.69
59.68
50.88
ANTHRAX.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
146
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
89
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Percentage of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
60.95
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE.
Number attacked.
1,185
107
..
..
170
..
87
..
..
100
720
..
5
53
20
73
..
35
226
Number died.
48
22
..
..
10
..
27
..
..
10
2
..
4
1
4
5
..
16
64
Percentage of deaths.
4.05
20.56
..
..
5.88
..
31
..
..
10
27
..
80
1.88
20
6.84
..
45.71
28.31
PLEURO—PNEUMONIA.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Percentage of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
CHARBON
SYMPTOMATIQUE.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
.. ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Percentage
of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
OTHER DISEASES.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
954
83
..
..
..
113
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
3
1
..
..
..
2
..
..
..
Percentage of deaths.
..
..
.. ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.31
1.24
..
..
..
1.76
..
..
..
TOTAL.
Number attacked.
1,185
130
23
165
2,474
98
540
440
1,425
193
2,165
83
39
280
287
208
1,103
737
906
Number died.
48
42
11
113
1,964
65
193
116
921
36
262
1
26
113
172
9
504
435
410
Percentage of deaths.
4.05
32.3
47.82
68.5
56.53
66.32
35.74
26.18
64.63
18.65
12.1
1.24
66.66
40.35
60
4.32
45.69
59
45-25
cxy
TABLE M.—co
Showing Districts where Outbreaks of Cattle—disease occurred during 1897—98.
PROVINCE.
North—Western
Provinces
and Oudh.
DISTRICT.
Gonda ..
Ghazipur ..
Hamirpur ..
Hardoi ..
Jalaun ..
Jhansi ..
Jaunpur ..
Kheri ..
Lucknow ..
Mirzapur ..
Muzaffarnagar ..
Muttra ..
Mainpuri ..
Meerut ..
Moradabad ..
Naini Tal ..
Pertabgarh ..
Phillbit ..
Rae Bareilly ..
Sitapur ..
Sultanpur ..
Saharanpur ..
Shahjehanpur
..
TOTAL
..
RINDERPEST.
Number attacked.
744
7,975
378
389
1,503
..
524
..
..
581
103
731
17
53
114
..
2,622
14
269
7
226
..
129
25,783
Number died.
466
4,843
233
303
586
..
14
..
..
260
53
205
10
22
107
..
618
14
28
7
122
..
77
13,101
Percentage of deaths.
62.63
60.7
61.64
77.88
38.98
..
267
..
..
44.75
51.45
28.04
58.82
41.50
93.85
..
23.57
100
10.40
100
54
..
59.68
50.81
ANTHRAX.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
34
5
185
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
39
4
122
Percentage
of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
85.29
80
65.94
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE.
Number attacked.
..
312
7,817
549
53
..
265
8
745
57
1,202
4
10
191
5
24
..
22
..
..
64
63
14,172
Number died.
..
189
243
12
2
..
3
..
12
3
270
..
2
..
5
4
..
..
..
..
6
6
970
Percentage of deaths.
..
6.5
3.18
..
2.18
3.77
..
1.13
..
1.61
5.26
22.46
..
21
..
100
16.6
..
..
..
..
9.37
9.52
6.84
PLEURO—PNEUMONIA.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Percentage of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
CHARBON
SYMPTOMATIQUE.
Number attacked.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
....
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Number died.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
....
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Percentage
of deaths.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
OTHER DISEASES.
Number attacked.
..
514
..
..
..
..
3
..
..
..
..
..
..
107
523
..
4
..
202
88
..
218
237
3,046
Number died.
..
336
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
1
..
4
..
1
71
..
11
1
431
Percentage of deaths.
..
65.3
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
19
..
100
..
49
80.7
..
5.04
42
14.14
TOTAL.
Number attacked.
744
8,801
8,195
389
2,052
53
527
265
8
1,826
160
1,933
21
170
828
5
2,650
14
493
95
226
316
434
43,186
Number died.
466
5,363
476
303
698
2
14
3
..
272
56
475
10
24
108
5
626
14
29
78
122
46
88
14,624
Percentage of deaths.
63.63
60.9
5.8
77.88
29.14
3.8
2.65
1.13
..
20.51
35
24.57
47.61
14.11
13.04
100
23.64
100
5.88
82.1
54
14.55
20.27
33.86
cxvi