5
Similarly the table below shows the districts in which the inspections by
Civil Surgeons of re-vaccinations were highest—
Muzaffargarh
...
...
...
...
...
...
Kohát
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Gurgáon ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Lahore
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Gurdáspur
...
...
...
...
...
...
69.03
54.55
49.69
29.75
21.71
The percentages of primary and re-vaccination cases found successful by
Civil Surgeons in the districts shown in the above two tables are contrasted sepa-
rately with the percentages reported by Native Supervisors and Vaccinators.
Name of District.
PRIMARY VACCINATIONS.
Lahore
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Gurgáou ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Muzaffargarh
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ludhiána ...
...
...
...
... ... ... ... ...
Amritsar ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Rohtak
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
RE-VACCINATIONS.
Mnzaffargarh
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Kohát
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Gurgáon
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Lahore ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Gurdaspur
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Percentage of cases
found successful
of total number
inspected by Civil
Surgeons.
91.70
80.00
81.08
99.55
99.38
98.63
89.42
91.68
70.00
36.30
70.00
Percentage of cases
found successful
of total number
inspected by Na-
tive Supervisors
or other inspect-
ing officers.
94.30
90.00
99.02
96.80
99.52
98.97
95.82
86.35
72.00
41.50
69.00
Percentage of suc-
cessful cases re-
ported by
the
Vaccinators.
93.66
96.78
98.58
69.21
97.83
97.39
85.60
83.06
62.86
40.89
59.46
The percentages of successful primary vaccinations reported by Civil
Surgeons, Native Supervisors or other Inspecting Officers and Vaccinators, as
observed in the report for 1892-93 are, with few exceptions, nearly equal and
require no remarks, while the percentages in cases of re-vaccinations are so
variable that comment on them would be useless. These variations as
observed in last year's report are no doubt due to differences in opinion
as to what each Inspecting Officer considers a successful vaccination, but as
desired by His Honor in the review of the Report on vaccination for 1892-93,
para. 2, instructions will be issued to Native Supervisors and vaccinators on
this subject and as far as possible a standard laid down for judging what cases
should be recorded as successful by them.
The places in which com-
pulsory Vaccination Act
was introduced.
18. The compulsory Vaccination Act was introduced during the year
in Dharmsála, Jullundur, Jhang cum-Maghiána, Murree,
Edwardesabad, Dera Gházi Khan and Dalhousie and was
under consideration for Jhajjar, Beri and Delhi.
Lambardárs'
lists of
persons vaccinated.
19. "With the view to checking the work done by Vaccinators, they
are directed to prepare a list of the children vacci-
nated by them and leave it with the lambardár of the
village where it is subsequently seen by the Native Supervisor on
his visit to the village and the entries in it checked. In order to exercise
further control over these lists, Civil Surgeons are directed to send for
them through the Deputy Commissioner of the District and compare
them with the monthly returns submitted by the Vaccinators. The table overleaf