Gender, Authorship, and Early Modern Women’s Collaboration  [electronic resource] /
Pender, Patricia.editor.
This book explores the collaborative practices – both literary and material – that women undertook in the production of early modern texts. It confronts two ongoing methodological dilemmas.  How does conceiving women’s texts as collaborations between authors, readers, annotators, editors, printers, and patrons uphold or disrupt current understandings of authorship? And how does reconceiving such texts as collaborative illuminate some of the unresolved discontinuities and competing agendas in early modern women’s studies?  From one perspective, viewing early modern women’s writing as collaborative seems to threaten the hard-won legitimacy of the authors we have already recovered; from another, developing our understanding of literary agency beyond capital “A” authorship opens the field to the surprising range of roles that women played in the history of early modern books. Instead of trying to simply shift, disaggregate or adjudicate between competing claims for male or female priority in the production of early modern texts, Gender, Authorship, and Early Modern Women’s Collaboration investigates the role that gender has played – and might continue to play – in understanding early modern collaboration and its consequences for women’s literary history. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction: Patricia Pender -- “A veray patronesse”: Margaret Beaufort and the Early English Printers: Patricia Pender -- Henry VIII, Katherine Parr, and Literary Collaboration: Micheline White -- “The Learning of a Cleric, the Life of a Saint”: Collaboration and Collusion in the Construction of Lady Jane Grey: Louise Horton -- Collaboration and the Lumley/ Fitzalan family manuscripts: Alexandra Day -- Early modern women’s marginalia as collaborative textual practice: Rosalind Smith -- Collaborative Authorship and the Speeches of Queen Elizabeth I: Leah S. Marcus -- Notions of Gender, Authorship, and Collaboration in Paratexts Prefacing Early Modern Englishwomen’s Translations: Brenda M. Hosington -- Is literary patronage a form of literary collaboration?: Julie Crawford -- Correcting The Mothers Legacy: The Rationale of Goad’s Emendations: Rebecca Stark-Gendrano -- “Mercurial Women”:  Late Seventeenth-Century English Women and the Print Ephemera Trades: Margaret J.M. Ezell.
This book explores the collaborative practices – both literary and material – that women undertook in the production of early modern texts. It confronts two ongoing methodological dilemmas.  How does conceiving women’s texts as collaborations between authors, readers, annotators, editors, printers, and patrons uphold or disrupt current understandings of authorship? And how does reconceiving such texts as collaborative illuminate some of the unresolved discontinuities and competing agendas in early modern women’s studies?  From one perspective, viewing early modern women’s writing as collaborative seems to threaten the hard-won legitimacy of the authors we have already recovered; from another, developing our understanding of literary agency beyond capital “A” authorship opens the field to the surprising range of roles that women played in the history of early modern books. Instead of trying to simply shift, disaggregate or adjudicate between competing claims for male or female priority in the production of early modern texts, Gender, Authorship, and Early Modern Women’s Collaboration investigates the role that gender has played – and might continue to play – in understanding early modern collaboration and its consequences for women’s literary history. .
Literature, Modern.
Literature-History and criticism.
British literature.
Europe-History-1492-.
Early Modern/Renaissance Literature.
Literary History.
British and Irish Literature.
History of Early Modern Europe.