Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union [electronic resource] : Protecting Public and Planet /
Smith, M.author.
During the first decade of the twenty-first century, the United States increasingly has relaxed its regulatory posture in the face of critical challenges to public health and the environment. This is true for regulation of recycling of end-of-life products, including autos and electronic components; potentially hazardous chemicals; and health claims on food labels. Coincidentally, the European Union has gravitated toward more restrictive regulation in these very same areas. How might we explain these diverging regulatory trajectories of the world s two largest market economies in an era of rising public awareness of dangers to the public and the planet? The explanation derives not from cultural differences in willingness to tolerate risk, but rather from distinctive regulatory tradeoffs - between environment and competitiveness in the United States and environment, competitiveness, and integration in the EU.
Description based upon print version of record.
Cover; Half-Title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. Divergent Regulatory Trajectories; 2. Chemicals Regulation: Courts Rule in the United States;  Industry Ascendant in the EU; 3. Health Claims on Food Labels: Protecting Free Commercial Speech versus Completing the Single Market; 4. Recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles: "Good Product Stewardship" in the United States;  Producer Pays in the EU; 5. Regulatory Trade-offs and Outcomes; Notes; Bibliography; Index
Includes bibliographical references and index.
During the first decade of the twenty-first century, the United States increasingly has relaxed its regulatory posture in the face of critical challenges to public health and the environment. This is true for regulation of recycling of end-of-life products, including autos and electronic components; potentially hazardous chemicals; and health claims on food labels. Coincidentally, the European Union has gravitated toward more restrictive regulation in these very same areas. How might we explain these diverging regulatory trajectories of the world s two largest market economies in an era of rising public awareness of dangers to the public and the planet? The explanation derives not from cultural differences in willingness to tolerate risk, but rather from distinctive regulatory tradeoffs - between environment and competitiveness in the United States and environment, competitiveness, and integration in the EU.
Environmental policy.
Political science.
International relations.
Diplomacy.
Environmental Politics.
Political Science.
International Relations.
Diplomacy.