The exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd.
London : Printed for John Wright at the Kings Head in the old Bailey,
1650.
A reply to: Gee, Edward.  An exercitation concerning usurped powers.
Annotation on Thomason copy: "March 27"; "Aprill 3d 1649"; the 50 in imprint date is crossed out.
Wing (2nd ed.)
Thomason
ESTC
Gee, Edward, 1613-1660.
Allegiance
Oaths
Obedience