OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Belgium 2015 [electronic resource] /
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Paris : OECD Publishing,
2015.
The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. DAC peer reviews assess the performance of a given member, not just that of its development co-operation agency, and examine both policy and implementation. They take an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member under review. Since the 2010 peer review, Belgium has reinforced the leadership and management of its institutional system for development co-operation, making it more strategic and taking steps towards delivering more co-ordinated and high quality development co-operation.
Conducting the peer review -- Abbreviations and acronyms -- Belgium's aid at a glance -- Context of Belgium's peer review -- The DAC's main findings and recommendations -- Towards a comprehensive Belgian development effort -- Belgium's vision and policies for development co-operation -- Allocating Belgium's official development assistance -- Managing Belgium's development co-operation -- Belgium's development co-operation delivery and partnerships -- Results-based management, learning and accountability in the Belgian programme -- Belgium's humanitarian assistance -- Progress since the 2010 DAC peerreview recommendations -- OECD/DAC standard suite of tables -- Field visit to Rwanda -- Organisational structure.
The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. DAC peer reviews assess the performance of a given member, not just that of its development co-operation agency, and examine both policy and implementation. They take an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member under review. Since the 2010 peer review, Belgium has reinforced the leadership and management of its institutional system for development co-operation, making it more strategic and taking steps towards delivering more co-ordinated and high quality development co-operation.
Development