Going Amiss in Experimental Research [electronic resource] /
Hon, Giora.editor.
Schickore, Jutta.editor.
Steinle, Friedrich.editor.
Like any goal-oriented procedure, experiment is subject to many kinds of failures. These failures have a variety of features, depending on the particulars of their sources. For the experimenter these pitfalls should be avoided and their effects minimized. For the historian-philosopher of science and the science educator, on the other hand, they are instructive starting points for reflecting on science in general and scientific method and practice in particular. Often more is learned from failure than from confirmation and successful application. The identification of error, its source, its context, and its treatment shed light on both practices and epistemic claims. This book shows that it is fruitful to bring to light forgotten and lost failures, subject them to analysis and learn from their moral. The study of failures, errors, pitfalls and mistakes helps us understand the way knowledge is pursued and indeed generated. The book presents both historical accounts and philosophical analyses of failures in experimental practice. It covers topics such as "error as an object of study", "learning from error", "concepts and dead ends", "instrumental artifacts", and "surprise and puzzlement". This book will be of interest to historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science as well as to practicing scientists and science educators.
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references.
Introduction: Mapping “Going Amiss” -- Introduction: Mapping “Going Amiss” -- Error as an Object of Study -- Error: The Long Neglect, the One-Sided View, and a Typology -- Error as Historiographical Challenge: The Infamous Globule Hypothesis -- Learning From Error -- Learning Without Error -- Living Extremely Flat: The Life of an Automaton; John von Neumann’s Conception of Error of (in)Animate Systems -- Concepts and Dead Ends -- Experimental Reorientations -- Concepts from the Bench: Hans Krebs, Kurt Henseleit and the Urea Cycle -- How Experiments Make Concepts Fail: Faraday and Magnetic Curves -- A Pioneer Who Never Got It Right: James Dewar and the Elusive Phenomena of Cold -- Instrumental Artifacts -- Distinguishing Real Results from Instrumental Artifacts: The Case of the Missing Rain -- Going Right and Making It Wrong: The Reception of Fizeau’s Ether-Drift Experiment of 1859 -- The Spectrum of ? Decay: Continuous or Discrete? A Variety of Errors in Experimental Investigation -- Surprise and Puzzlement -- The Scent of Filth: Experiments, Waste, and the Set-Up -- In the Thick of Organic Matter.
Like any goal-oriented procedure, experiment is subject to many kinds of failures. These failures have a variety of features, depending on the particulars of their sources. For the experimenter these pitfalls should be avoided and their effects minimized. For the historian-philosopher of science and the science educator, on the other hand, they are instructive starting points for reflecting on science in general and scientific method and practice in particular. Often more is learned from failure than from confirmation and successful application. The identification of error, its source, its context, and its treatment shed light on both practices and epistemic claims. This book shows that it is fruitful to bring to light forgotten and lost failures, subject them to analysis and learn from their moral. The study of failures, errors, pitfalls and mistakes helps us understand the way knowledge is pursued and indeed generated. The book presents both historical accounts and philosophical analyses of failures in experimental practice. It covers topics such as "error as an object of study", "learning from error", "concepts and dead ends", "instrumental artifacts", and "surprise and puzzlement". This book will be of interest to historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science as well as to practicing scientists and science educators.
Philosophy and science.
History.
Philosophy of Science.
History of Science.
Science, Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary.


Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science