Preferences in Negotiations [electronic resource] : The Attachment Effect /
Gimpel, Henner.author.
Negotiations are ubiquitous in business, politics, and private life. In many cases their outcome is of great importance. Yet, negotiators frequently act irrationally and fail to reach mutually beneficial agreements. Cognitive biases like overconfidence, egocentrism, and the mythical fixed pie illusion oftentimes foreclose profitable results. A further cognitive bias is the attachment effect: Parties are influenced by their subjective expectations formed on account of the exchange of offers, they form reference points, and loss aversion potentially leads to a change of preferences when expectations change. This book presents a motivation, formalization, and substantiation of the attachment effect. Thereby, preferences and behavior are approached from a microeconomic and a psychological perspective. Two experiments show clear evidence for a systematic bias. The results can be used for prescriptive advice to negotiators: either for debiasing or to systematically affect the counterparty.
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references.
Theories on Preferences -- Preferences in Negotiations -- Internet Experiment -- Laboratory Experiment -- Conclusions and Future Work.
Negotiations are ubiquitous in business, politics, and private life. In many cases their outcome is of great importance. Yet, negotiators frequently act irrationally and fail to reach mutually beneficial agreements. Cognitive biases like overconfidence, egocentrism, and the mythical fixed pie illusion oftentimes foreclose profitable results. A further cognitive bias is the attachment effect: Parties are influenced by their subjective expectations formed on account of the exchange of offers, they form reference points, and loss aversion potentially leads to a change of preferences when expectations change. This book presents a motivation, formalization, and substantiation of the attachment effect. Thereby, preferences and behavior are approached from a microeconomic and a psychological perspective. Two experiments show clear evidence for a systematic bias. The results can be used for prescriptive advice to negotiators: either for debiasing or to systematically affect the counterparty.
Behavioral sciences.
Microeconomics.
Applied mathematics.
Engineering mathematics.
Operations research.
Decision making.
Game theory.
Psychology.
Behavioral Sciences.
Microeconomics.
Applications of Mathematics.
Operations Research/Decision Theory.
Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences.
Psychology, general.
Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems