Levels of argument : a comparative study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics
Scott, DominicAuthor
Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suffice, Aristotle because he thinks there is no need to go beyond it.
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suffice, Aristotle because he thinks there is no need to go beyond it.
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on March 12, 2015).
Plato.
Aristotle.
Philosophy & Religion
Philosophy