The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature [electronic resource] /
Cao, Shunqing.author.
Professor Cao Shunqing’s book on The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature, now available in English, is a welcome attempt to break through the linguistic barrier that keeps most comparatists in China enclosed within their own cultural domain. Cao’s book aims to open a dialogue with scholars around the world. The Variation Theory is a response to the one-sided emphasis on influence studies by the former “French school” as well as to the American focus on aesthetic interpretation, inspired by New Criticism, which regrettably ignored literature in non-European languages. Our Chinese colleagues are right in seeing the restrictions of former comparative studies and are fully entitled to rectify those shortcomings. However, it is important to view the rise and interaction of the various schools that Cao describes in their historical context. by Douwe W. Fokkema Former President  of the International Comparative Literature Association Emeritus Professor of Comparative Literature, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.
Introduction The Variation Theory: An Important Breakthrough of Comparative Literature -- Chapter I Major Contributions of Influence Study and Its Weaknesses -- ChapterⅡ Major Contributions of Parallel Study and Its Weaknesses -- Chapter Ⅲ The Variation Theory on the Aspect of cross-state -- Chapter V Cross-cultural Variation Theory -- Chapter Ⅵ Cross-civilization Variation Theory.
Professor Cao Shunqing’s book on The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature, now available in English, is a welcome attempt to break through the linguistic barrier that keeps most comparatists in China enclosed within their own cultural domain. Cao’s book aims to open a dialogue with scholars around the world. The Variation Theory is a response to the one-sided emphasis on influence studies by the former “French school” as well as to the American focus on aesthetic interpretation, inspired by New Criticism, which regrettably ignored literature in non-European languages. Our Chinese colleagues are right in seeing the restrictions of former comparative studies and are fully entitled to rectify those shortcomings. However, it is important to view the rise and interaction of the various schools that Cao describes in their historical context. by Douwe W. Fokkema Former President  of the International Comparative Literature Association Emeritus Professor of Comparative Literature, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Comparative linguistics.
Communication.
Comparative Linguistics.
Communication Studies.