Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements  [electronic resource] : How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict  /
Peters, Ina.author.
Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam. Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics – particularly cohesion and fragmentation – in social movements. The study considers the influence of the regional context and the applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology. Contents  Social Movement Theory Grounded Theory Methodology Economic and environmental policy in the Brazilian Amazon Rationale of the Belo Monte conflict Traveling of theories and concepts Target Groups  Researchers and students of Social Movement Research, Latin American Studies, and (Comparative) Area Studies Practitioners in the fields of environmental governance, sustainable development, and human rights  The Author Ina Peters is head of research management at the Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL). She was a research fellow at the GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies headed by Professor Detlef Nolte and a doctoral student of Professor Kai-Uwe Schnapp at Universität Hamburg. .
Includes bibliographical references.
Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam. Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics – particularly cohesion and fragmentation – in social movements. The study considers the influence of the regional context and the applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology. Contents  Social Movement Theory Grounded Theory Methodology Economic and environmental policy in the Brazilian Amazon Rationale of the Belo Monte conflict Traveling of theories and concepts Target Groups  Researchers and students of Social Movement Research, Latin American Studies, and (Comparative) Area Studies Practitioners in the fields of environmental governance, sustainable development, and human rights  The Author Ina Peters is head of research management at the Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL). She was a research fellow at the GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies headed by Professor Detlef Nolte and a doctoral student of Professor Kai-Uwe Schnapp at Universität Hamburg. .
Political science.
Social structure.
Social inequality.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Political Science.
Social Structure, Social Inequality.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.