The Politics of Judicial Review [electronic resource] : Supranational Administrative Acts and Judicialized Compliance Conflict in the EU /
Adam, Christian.author.
This book unites scholarship on law and politics with compliance research in the EU to shed light on the political role of a neglected dimension of litigation in the EU: the political role of governmental actions for annulment. The book does not portray national governments as passive actors within the EU's judicial arena. Instead it focuses on cases in which national governments turn to the Court of Justice to litigate against the European Commission, and provides several answers to the question of why EU member state governments take this decision. Governments hope, on the one hand, to evade costly domestic adjustments where the Commission uses administrative acts to interfere with domestic policy application. On the other hand, governments hope to provoke judicial law-making to influence the long-term development of EU administrative law and sectoral regulation. The book will be of particular interest to political scientists and legal scholars. . .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part I. Tracing Causal Mechanisms: Why Governments Activate the Court of Justice -- Chapter 2. Policy Misfit and Governmental Litigation -- Chapter 3. Governmental Litigation as a form of Legal Activism -- Part II. Moving Beyond Anecdotal Evidence: The Role of Policy Misfit and Legal Activism in the EU's State and Policy Regime -- Chapter 4. State Aid Control in the European Union -- Chapter 5. Governmental Litigation, Policy Misfit and Legal Activism in the EU's State Aid -- Chapter 6. Conclusion. .
This book unites scholarship on law and politics with compliance research in the EU to shed light on the political role of a neglected dimension of litigation in the EU: the political role of governmental actions for annulment. The book does not portray national governments as passive actors within the EU's judicial arena. Instead it focuses on cases in which national governments turn to the Court of Justice to litigate against the European Commission, and provides several answers to the question of why EU member state governments take this decision. Governments hope, on the one hand, to evade costly domestic adjustments where the Commission uses administrative acts to interfere with domestic policy application. On the other hand, governments hope to provoke judicial law-making to influence the long-term development of EU administrative law and sectoral regulation. The book will be of particular interest to political scientists and legal scholars. . .
Public policy.
European Union.
Public Policy.
European Union Politics.