Time to add CSFS to Signet?

Time to add CSFS to Signet?
2025-03-17 14:11 ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
                   ` (2 more replies)
  
From: Weikeng Chen @ 2025-03-17  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]

I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be 
added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a 
lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, 
CSFS isn't.

With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to 
start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM 
by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential 
on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying 
on CTV + CSFS to develop further.

Thanks,
Weikeng

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1283 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-17 14:11 ` 
                   ` 
  
From: Weikeng Chen @ 2025-03-17  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]

I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be 
added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a 
lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, 
CSFS isn't.

With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to 
start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM 
by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential 
on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying 
on CTV + CSFS to develop further.

Thanks,
Weikeng

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1283 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-17  3:38 [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet? Weikeng Chen
  2025-03-17 14:11 ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List

  2025-03-20 13:10   ` Greg Sanders
  2025-03-17 22:52 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  
From: /dev /fd0 @ 2025-03-17 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Weikeng Chen;  Bitcoin Development Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2118 bytes --]

Hi Weikeng,

I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No
objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin
developers.

Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for it on
[twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2].

[0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
[1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818
[2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28

/dev/fd0
floppy disk guy

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weikeng.chen@l2iterative•com>
wrote:

> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be
> added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a
> lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years,
> CSFS isn't.
>
> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to
> start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM
> by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential
> on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying
> on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
>
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CALiT-Zo3JcUjyQ3%3D--oecm6Nq2CM20AzZbpLQsZhSXKJfxm7rQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3340 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-17  3:38 [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet? Weikeng Chen
  2025-03-17 14:11 ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  2025-03-17 14:43 ` /dev /fd0

  2025-03-18  6:55   ` Weikeng Chen
  
From: 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List @ 2025-03-17 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Weikeng Chen;  Bitcoin Development Mailing List

Hi Weikeng,

CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
https://faucet.mutinynet.com/

[signet]
signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
addnode=45.79.52.207:38333
dnsseed=0
signetblocktime=30

BR,
moonsettler


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <weikeng.chen@l2iterative•com> wrote:

> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.
> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> 
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/YTXcnvj3CZoGdDNe3guQByg4YvYt2SXX8O-PmFe281ihDmVzAgbEpxVje8hO-vXqdaQNOw0pTB7w8G0hgkqZzUbCKbQ83RQx1Zm857ctfpg%3D%40protonmail.com.


 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-17 22:52 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List

  2025-03-18 16:40     ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  
From: Weikeng Chen @ 2025-03-18  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2367 bytes --]

Moonsettler, 

I can see that LNHANCE has already had a live "mutinynet" working as a 
functional network for testing.
Do you think it is still necessary to add it to the "signet" signet or just 
wait until more progress with CTV + CSFS on the bitcoin/bitcoin repository 
as PRs and then to testnet?

Thanks,
Weikeng

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09 AM UTC+8 moonsettler wrote:

> Hi Weikeng,
>
> CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
> https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
> https://faucet.mutinynet.com/
>
> [signet]
>
> signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
> addnode=45.79.52.207:38333
> dnsseed=0
> signetblocktime=30
>
> BR,
> moonsettler
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <
> weiken...@l2iterative•com> wrote:
>
> > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be 
> added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a 
> lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, 
> CSFS isn't.
> > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to 
> start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM 
> by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential 
> on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying 
> on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Weikeng
> > 
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
> > To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4269 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-18  6:55   ` Weikeng Chen

  
From: 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List @ 2025-03-18 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Weikeng Chen;  Bitcoin Development Mailing List

Hi Weikeng,

I'm obviously not opposed to the idea, just not sure what makes one signet more significant than an other?
The important thing is, there is a signet up and running for protocol devs to test things out on and for people to use as playground.

Now activating LNhance on a testnet would be more fun.

BR,
moonsettler


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Tuesday, March 18th, 2025 at 7:55 AM, Weikeng Chen <weikeng.chen@l2iterative•com> wrote:

> Moonsettler,
> I can see that LNHANCE has already had a live "mutinynet" working as a functional network for testing.
> Do you think it is still necessary to add it to the "signet" signet or just wait until more progress with CTV + CSFS on the bitcoin/bitcoin repository as PRs and then to testnet?
> 
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
> On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09 AM UTC+8 moonsettler wrote:
> 
> > Hi Weikeng,
> > 
> > CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
> > https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
> > https://faucet.mutinynet.com/
> > 
> > [signet]
> > signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
> > addnode=45.79.52.207:38333
> > dnsseed=0
> > signetblocktime=30
> > 
> > BR,
> > moonsettler
> > 
> > 
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > 
> > On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative•com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.
> > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Weikeng
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
> > > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/-rjcTH9purJtX6ug3rqaNVdouiTPS1hKYrLVzXmcGTsXIgt4AvtTjFpFFlpfP47n529efE5Ltl5CZ5yScbc08P02c52pfdw9nTwwLQbE_cA%3D%40protonmail.com.


 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-17 14:43 ` /dev /fd0

  2025-03-26 11:54     ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  
From: Greg Sanders @ 2025-03-20 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2548 bytes --]

Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is 
not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not 
sure.

I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of BIP348-compatible PRs, 
at a minimum.

Greg
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52 PM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote:

> Hi Weikeng,
>
> I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No 
> objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin 
> developers.
>
> Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for it 
> on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2].
>
> [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
> [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818
> [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28
>
> /dev/fd0
> floppy disk guy
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative•com> 
> wrote:
>
>> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be 
>> added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a 
>> lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, 
>> CSFS isn't.
>>
>> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to 
>> start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM 
>> by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential 
>> on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying 
>> on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Weikeng
>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5143 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-20 13:10   ` Greg Sanders

  2025-03-26 13:36       ` Greg Sanders
  
From: 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List @ 2025-03-26 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sanders;  Bitcoin Development Mailing List

Hi Greg,

> Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is not BIP348 compliant. 
Wdym not compliant? Because it also has CSFSV?

BR,
moonsetler

On Monday, March 24th, 2025 at 2:29 AM, Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail•com> wrote:

> Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not sure.
> I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of BIP348-compatible PRs, at a minimum.
> 
> Greg
> On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52 PM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote:
> 
> > Hi Weikeng,
> > I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin developers.
> > 
> > Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for it on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2].
> > 
> > [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
> > [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818
> > [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28
> > 
> > /dev/fd0
> > floppy disk guy
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative•com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.
> > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Weikeng
> > 
> > > --
> > 
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
> > > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/BWU6T8rrVsSA-FFm28kCe3wAtlC-OYmSgUgdCQ4BR3r5hmwYsvzbnuQ6qDt-4QMLliq-uHN_ahE6g85xOTVoE0-prpGNjv1depjIRokunw4%3D%40protonmail.com.


 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2025-03-26 11:54     ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List

  
From: Greg Sanders @ 2025-03-26 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: moonsettler;  Bitcoin Development Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3324 bytes --]

Correct.

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 7:54 AM moonsettler <moonsettler@protonmail•com>
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> > Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet
> is not BIP348 compliant.
> Wdym not compliant? Because it also has CSFSV?
>
> BR,
> moonsetler
>
> On Monday, March 24th, 2025 at 2:29 AM, Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail•com>
> wrote:
>
> > Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet
> is not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not
> sure.
> > I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of BIP348-compatible
> PRs, at a minimum.
> >
> > Greg
> > On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52 PM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Weikeng,
> > > I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No
> objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin
> developers.
> > >
> > > Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for
> it on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2].
> > >
> > > [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
> > > [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818
> > > [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28
> > >
> > > /dev/fd0
> > > floppy disk guy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative•com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS
> should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently
> received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a
> few years, CSFS isn't.
> > > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the
> LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps
> with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower
> potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows
> applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Weikeng
> > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
> > > > To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com
> .
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> > To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAB3F3DuJECHnTnOJNqru4qjJ_%3DL%2BNetVO7oNANEF9ZCK%2BmJo-g%40mail.gmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5063 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]