Open Bitcoin Privacy Project Spring 2015 Report

Open Bitcoin Privacy Project Spring 2015 Report
[not found] ` <CABr1YTeWFRhdwJgDa3Ly6Y-Y-s5vtka_bHT7kcT69ydX2o3Ruw@mail.gmail.com>
  
From: Justus Ranvier @ 2015-05-18 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1818 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We're produced the first in what we hope to be a long series of
reviews of Bitcoin wallet privacy features, available here:

http://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/2015/05/spring-2015-wallet-privacy-rating-report/

https://github.com/OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/wallet-ratings/raw/master/2015-1/OBPP%20Bitcoin%20Wallet%20Privacy%20Rating%20Report%20-%20Spring%202015.pdf

Specifically from the readers of this list, we are very interested in
feedback regarding our privacy threat model and the rating criteria we
derive from it.

Threat model:
https://github.com/OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/wallet-ratings/blob/master/2015-1/threat%20model.wiki

Please send any suggestions or corrections via a GitHub issue to the
wallet-ratings repository so that we can incorporate it into future
reports.

- -- 
Justus Ranvier
Open Bitcoin Privacy Project
http://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/
justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject•org
E7AD 8215 8497 3673 6D9E 61C4 2A5F DA70 EAD9 E623
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=NMNo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: 0xEAD9E623.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 18381 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
[not found] ` <CABr1YTeWFRhdwJgDa3Ly6Y-Y-s5vtka_bHT7kcT69ydX2o3Ruw@mail.gmail.com>

  2015-05-19 11:19     ` Jonas Schnelli
  
From: Justus Ranvier @ 2015-05-18 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1676 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Replying to the list because this is a common question.

We rated as many wallets as we could based on the amount of manpower
we had available to perform the ratings.

We will be holding a recruiting drive shortly to solicit additional
volunteers so that we can cover more wallet for the next round of ratings.


On 05/18/2015 11:40 PM, Eric Lombrozo wrote:
> mSIGNA is notably absent from the report despite having some of the
> most advanced security and privacy features and having been on the
> bitcoin.org site longer than some of the other wallets reviewed.
> 
> Is there some process to get reviewed I missed? Please add us to
> the report.

- -- 
Justus Ranvier
Open Bitcoin Privacy Project
http://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/
justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject•org
E7AD 8215 8497 3673 6D9E 61C4 2A5F DA70 EAD9 E623
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kWhU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: 0xEAD9E623.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 18381 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2015-05-18 21:57   ` Justus Ranvier

  2015-05-19 11:50       ` Jonas Schnelli
  
From: Jonas Schnelli @ 2015-05-19 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justus Ranvier;  Bitcoin Dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1309 bytes --]




Freundliche Grüsse
---
Jonas Schnelli

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
include7 AG
Jonas Schnelli
Mattengasse 27
CH-8005 Zürich
Switzerland
Office: +41 44 500 16 70

Mail: jonas.schnelli@include7•ch
Web: www.include7.ch
V-Card: www.include7.ch/js.vcf
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

ACHTUNG
Bitte senden sie uns keine sensitiven Daten in unverschlüsselten E-Mails.
Verwenden Sie hierzu folgenden Link:
https://include7.ch/contact/secureform

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

> Am 18.05.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject•org>:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Replying to the list because this is a common question.
> 
> We rated as many wallets as we could based on the amount of manpower
> we had available to perform the ratings.
> 
> We will be holding a recruiting drive shortly to solicit additional
> volunteers so that we can cover more wallet for the next round of ratings.
> 

Hi Justus

Is there a reason why Bitcoin-Core and Breadwallet (iOS) is missing?

Thanks
—
</Jonas>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3217 bytes --]

 permalink raw reply	[|nested]
2015-05-19 11:19     ` Jonas Schnelli

  
From: Jonas Schnelli @ 2015-05-19 11:50 UTC ( / )
  To: Justus Ranvier;  Bitcoin Dev



> 
>> Am 18.05.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject•org <mailto:justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject•org>>:
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Replying to the list because this is a common question.
>> 
>> We rated as many wallets as we could based on the amount of manpower
>> we had available to perform the ratings.
>> 
>> We will be holding a recruiting drive shortly to solicit additional
>> volunteers so that we can cover more wallet for the next round of ratings.
>> 
> 
> Hi Justus
> 
> Is there a reason why Bitcoin-Core and Breadwallet (iOS) is missing?
> 
> Thanks
> —
> </Jonas>

Sorry for the horrible top post, i accidentally added a text signature on top.