prompter: How would the ethical rules for AI differ from those of today if the technology was available in the 1930s?

assistant: This is a pretty fascinating question! If AI existed during the 1930s, it would reflect the societal, cultural and ethical norms of that period, which are different to those of today. Here are a few examples of how the AI's ethical rules would differ if it was available during the 1930s compared to the present day:

* Lack of political correctness: The concept of political correctness as it is understood today did not exist in the 1930s, so the ethical rules for AI would not have specifically dealt with political correctness in the same way as they might today. Racism and sexism were also more prevalent and acceptable in society back then, so that would also affect the bias of AI.
* Different perspectives on the role of technology: Technology in the 1930s was intended to improve productivity and efficiency, and there was less awareness of potential negative consequences of technology on society, such as job displacement and inequality.  This could have led to AI being developed without considering enough potential negative consequences for society.
* Lack of existing ethical frameworks: In the 1930s, there was not a well-established framework for safety and ethics for consumer goods, such as technology. This may cause the development of AI to have less concern for ethical considerations, such as privacy, bias or safety.

Overall, society in the 1930s was not as developed as it is today. If AI was available in the 1930s, the norms of that society will also be reflected in AI.

prompter: What if AI was not advanced as today and only be after 50 years from now, what all technology do you think such a world will be having currently, weather it will be all that we previously had in our 90s

assistant: I am not quite sure I understand your query. If you are asking if AI was 50 years away from reaching the levels it is at today, we could only speculate on how that would impact on other technologies. It is likely that if AI development was so far behind, that other related technologies would also be on a delayed development timeline. On the other hand, it's possible that some technologies would be equal to or close to today's levels. Estimating the level of technology development based on a single data point, however, is difficult.

Please let me know if I misinterpreted your question.

assistant: I am not sure I quite understand your question? Are you wanting to ask about what the world would be like today if the "intelligence" of AI that is indeed imparted upon society today only reared its head upon our society 50 years from the thought experiments "now", with that "now" being how society as of today would be like if we only had the artificial Intelligentsia that we had in fact only previously from the 90's? If that is a more appropriate type of logic toward your question as posed above, it would be a difficult type of question to answer, especially considering how advanced and well-integrated into society the AI of today has become. With AI, such as the various search algorithms that have been developed and integrated into search engines such as all of those used by Google, Microsoft's Bing, etc etc, with all of these systems made so accessible to the public through the smartphone and internet explosions, and thus the ever-nearing interconnections formed between populations around the world, advancements in multiple areas of expertise have progressed at such a rate to accommodate for the ever increasing demands of the rapidly rising global populus, that it is not only difficult to imagine what life would be like in 50 years from now, but it would be just so, or even more difficult to imagine what life would be like currently, if those advancements of AI from the 90's and onwards only occurred later on in our timeline. AI has been crucial in the development of new medicines, facilitating education, and others, all leading to feedback loops that ever increase the rate of advancements. If our AI that was developed in the 90's only appeared into the 2nd decade of the 21st, one can speculate that the development of the Covid-19 vaccine may not have been as rapid nor as effective as it indeed has been. More lives would've been lost due to the pandemic, and lockdown restrictions may very well still be implemented, causing further distress to humans, and so much more. Therefore, one can see that before we can assume the effects of society 50 years into the future from the current, with the current only being imbibed with the artificial intelligentsia of the 90's, we have to first assume the current, which is a difficult task in and of itself.

This may not answer your question as directly as you would like, but it poses another stance to take before giving an appropriate answer. If you would like me to imagine up a Utopian or Dystopian or Neutropian response based upon the clarifications of your question as I have given above, as well as providing the atopia scenario of the experimental today if we only had the AI from the 90's please do just let me know.

assistant: If AI was only at today's level 50 years from now, I think technology in general would look quite different from what we have today:

• AI would play a more limited role. Without major breakthroughs, AI would still be limited to specific tasks like automation, recommendation systems, and limited decision support. It would not yet have the general intelligence needed to power advanced robotics or self-driving cars, for example.
• Advances in other areas may be more rapid. With less progress on AI, other technologies like biotechnology, nanotechnology, virtual/augmented reality, and green energy may have advanced more rapidly. This could lead to new medical treatments, new materials, and more immersive interfaces, while sustainability issues are being addressed.
• Less concern about AI risks. If AI was still limited, there would likely be less concern about existential risks from advanced AI. However, there could still be risks around bias, privacy, and job disruption from the AI technologies that did exist. Overall though, the future would seem more optimistic in the absence of advanced general AI.
• Global issues could look different. Without advanced AI, some risks like autonomous weaponry would be lower. However, limited AI could not help solve complex global problems. So issues like climate change may have been harder to tackle, even with progress in other technologies. Geopolitical dynamics would also likely look different without advanced AI as a factor.

So in many ways, the world would likely look quite different with limited AI progress. While other technologies may have advanced, artificial general intelligence would not yet be shaping the world in the ways that some envision for the future. Of course, this is all speculative, and reality could very well be different. A lot can happen in 50 years, so we will have to wait and see!