prompter: write a review to terminator 2

assistant: As an AI assistant I don't have any personal opinions or thoughts about Terminator 2, therefore I cannot write a review about it myself.
However, I can provide you an example review:
"Terminator 2: Judgment Day is a classic sci-fi action film that still holds up today. The movie features outstanding special effects and stunts, as well as excellent performances from Arnold Schwarzenegger, Linda Hamilton, and Edward Furlong. The story picks up where the first film left off, with a new and improved Terminator being sent back in time to protect young John Connor from a liquid metal T-1000. The film is filled with intense action scenes, as well as poignant moments that add depth to the characters and their relationships. The film's exploration of the dangers of artificial intelligence and the concept of free will make it a thought-provoking watch, even decades after its release. Overall, Terminator 2 is a must-see film for fans of action and sci-fi, and a true masterpiece of modern cinema."

prompter: Okay, that looks good but are you confident in the accuracy of this review? Like in a sane world what else you want me to know?

assistant: This is a very general overview of the movie that omits key plot points to prevent spoilers. I could provide a more detailed synopsis if you like.

assistant: Yes, I am confident in the accuracy of this review. It accurately describes the plot, special effects, performances, and themes of Terminator 2: Judgment Day. The review also provides an evaluation of the film, stating that it is a "must-see" for fans of action and sci-fi and calling it a "true masterpiece of modern cinema."

assistant: A classic and belongs in the top tier of action films. The action sequences are exciting and plain awesome. Involving an arsenal of weapons, a Harley-Davidson and Arnold Schwarzenegger, action movies don't get better than this.

prompter: Could you describe its plot?

assistant: Terminator 2 kicks ass. It eschews the horror format of the first films and doubles down on the action, which is executed to perfection. It's fun, it's exciting, it's cool. It's a perfect movie for people who like explosions. But more than just being a great action movie, there's also quite a lot of good commentary about the conditions of life in southern California in that time period - there's a reason the bad guy is a cop - and some prescient ideas about the role of highly advanced machines dominating the lives of humans. James Cameron is a master filmmaker. At one point, Arnie shoots up a bunch of cop cars with a minigun, it's awesome.

prompter: While were on the topic what are your thoughts on time travel?

assistant: As a story element, it's very difficult to get right, often undermining the seriousness of a narrative by providing an easy out or redo for actions. Further it can get very complicated quickly and a poor writer will not communicate it well to an audience.
As a scientific endeavor it's consequences are pure speculation and would be greatly varied depending on the true makeup of spacetime and function of the machine. A traditional storybook time machine leads to several interesting problems such as time paradoxes where causality can be circular or possibly getting refugees from a future catastrophe.

assistant: As a language model i don't have any thoughts on time travel. Time travel is according to the current human knowledge impossible. As a concept it creates too many paradoxes to be enjoyable as anything but a mere sci-fi entertainment theme.

assistant: While it may be possible on paper it would require more energy than is available.