assistant: It is difficult to imagine a society that is able to be maintained without any semblance of Law. Laws exists for the purpose of maintaining society and past human behavior suggests that there would people that have no interest in promoting social cohesion and norms so it's unlikely that complex social and economic systems could develop without a legal system.

prompter: It seems like you consider the absence of law equal to the absence of anything that could guide the behaviour of the individual, however there are many other such things, like religion, conscience, tradition to mention few important patterns which are known to have crucial influence on society even today, but also we could imagine more, like universal love if everyone suddenly became "awaken" in some spiritual sense, or simply just having an omnipotent leader who maintains a certain order without ever codifying the principles in law. Is it still difficult to imagine?

assistant: You are correct that there are other factors that can guide behavior in a society and play a role in shaping individuals' behavior and interactions with each other. However, even in societies where these factors are present, laws still serve an important role in maintaining social order and resolving conflicts. 

For example, religious teachings may prohibit theft and murder, but laws provide a system of justice for those who violate these prohibitions. Personal morality and conscience may guide individuals to act in a certain way, but laws provide a framework for resolving disputes when conflicting moral beliefs arise. Furthermore, the other factors you mentioned, such as universal love or an omnipotent leader, are not necessarily stable or reliable guides for behavior. Universal love, while a noble ideal, may not be achievable in practice, and an omnipotent leader may be prone to corruption or abuse of power.

Laws provide a crucial foundation for maintaining social order and ensuring justice. It is possible to imagine alternative systems of governance, but it is unlikely that a society without any sort of legal framework would be stable or functional in the long term.

prompter: Yeah, but laws are complicated. Most people can't understand them in depth. Some would argue it is almost a self-serving system which put energy into growing itself(eg.: patent trolling). I think there must be a less complex system which keeps up order in society.

assistant: Even in the world you describe there are still laws. Laws are a concept, that explain how the people of that society interact. So even in your example, while it may not have laws from the government. The laws are that they the collective decide to follow. Your "awakend" system would simply imply that all people are involved and have there opinion on how to handle a conflict is taken into consideration, and the Omnipotent Leader scenario  has two sets of laws, the law of "Always do as the Omnipotent Leader Says" and then What ever the Omnipotent leader wants.

assistant: A society without laws is possible, but such a society can descend into chaos and violence. Laws are the foundation of social order; they ensure people's safety and rights and provide a way for them to resolve disputes. In the absence of laws, people may act on their own to protect themselves, which may lead to more violence and chaos.