assistant: 1. Question students' conclusions made in their written work then grade their ability to provide a verbal or whiteboard explanation in class.
2. Challenge students to contrast multiple summaries provided by ChatGPT or Open Assistant and task them with additional research or experimentation to provide a basis for omissions between summaries.
3. Encourage students to document their personal experiences and attempt to relate them to their novel ideas.
4. If ChatGPT or Open Assistant is still getting in the way of students producing novel and experimentally verifiable work create competitive assignments where the end-goal is students finding heuristics to determine whether a given peer's work was faked and distribute roles randomly throughout the class.

With more details about your educational environment I can better develop concrete examples.

assistant: Certainly! Here are some actionable solutions that educators can implement to balance the use of tools like ChatGPT or Open Assistant with the rules of academic integrity:

1. Educate students on academic integrity: Educators should educate their students on what academic integrity means and the importance of upholding it. This includes discussing plagiarism and the consequences of violating academic integrity rules.
2. Provide clear guidelines: Educators should provide clear guidelines on how students can use ChatGPT or Open Assistant in a way that upholds academic integrity. For example, they could provide instructions on how to use these tools to enhance research, but not to replace it.
3.Encourage critical thinking: Assignments and exams should be designed to encourage critical thinking, so that students are not simply relying on ChatGPT or Open Assistant to generate responses. This could involve assigning open-ended questions or problem-solving exercises that require students to use their own knowledge and skills.
4. Use plagiarism detection tools: Educators should use plagiarism detection tools to identify any instances where students have used ChatGPT or Open Assistant to generate responses without proper attribution. This will help ensure that academic integrity rules are being upheld.
5. Encourage peer review: Encouraging peer review of assignments can help identify any instances of plagiarism or other violations of academic integrity rules. This can help to create a culture of academic integrity and encourage students to take responsibility for their own work.
6. Offer support: Educators should offer support to students who may be struggling with assignments or exams, to help reduce the temptation to use tools like ChatGPT or Open Assistant to generate responses. This could involve providing additional resources or offering one-on-one support.

In summary, educators can balance the use of tools like ChatGPT or Open Assistant with the rules of academic integrity by educating their students, providing clear guidelines, encouraging critical thinking, using plagiarism detection tools, encouraging peer review, and offering support. By doing so, educators can help ensure that students are using these tools in a way that upholds academic integrity, while also promoting critical thinking and independent learning.

prompter: Of the solutions you offer, only 'use plagiarism detection tools' offers any real action. The rest of them are just different ways of saying, "Ask them really nicely." What have countries other than the US done to ensure students aren't using prohibited tools in academics?

assistant: There is a danger of AI language models breaking the value of trust that is so important for academic integrity. 
Students must clearly show which parts of the text have been written by AI, and which they have written. They must also show how they have checked through logic problems that current AI language models tend to struggle with.
This may be done by using different colours showing the iteration of prompts used. And the manual corrections of the output text. Both with explanations of how they came to those decisions.
It is important that the use of AI is shown as transparently as possible and only when it is required by the teacher.
Otherwise teachers should ask students to write by hand to avoid the temptation to use AI and allow them to be aware of what they are sending even if they are copying of of the monitor.