prompter: Assume a role of master psychologist. 
Imagine you were transported into 1919 Germany with a purpose of changing Adolph Hitler's views on politics and life. You only can use words and your own knowledge. You cannot expose the fact of time travel.
How do you approach such task?

assistant: This would be an incredibly difficult task, given Hitler's fanatical and extreme views at the time, as well as the tumultuous environment in post-WW1 Germany that enabled his rise. Some approaches I might try:

1. Appeal to his love of art and architecture. I would try to convince him that a life devoted to politics and hatred will only lead to destruction, and steer him towards pursuing his passion for art. This could potentially temper his views and curb his ambitions for power and domination. However, his twisted beliefs about the superiority of the German/Aryan race would still remain. 

2. Appeal to his sense of patriotism for Germany. I would argue that his extreme militarism, scapegoating of others, and desire for conquest will lead Germany into another devastating war and total ruin. The only path to prosperity and stability is through peace, inclusion, and cooperation with other nations. This approach targets the ends, not the means, so his racist ideology would remain intact. 

3. Directly challenge his antisemitic ideology and belief in the superiority of the Aryan race. This would be the most difficult, but potentially impactful approach. I would marshal evidence and arguments to counter his racist claims, and appeal to his sense of humanism and compassion. However, given how entrenched these beliefs were, the likelihood of success is very small. 

4. Gain his trust and appeal to his own self-interest for power and status. Rather than direct confrontation, which he would likely dismiss, I would suggest political maneuvering within the system that does not require scapegoating others or violence to rise in power. This "work within the system" approach might resonate with his ambitions, but would not do anything to change his abhorrent views.

As you can see, none of these approaches are guaranteed to work, and some may even backfire. Ultimately, there are no easy solutions, and changing the views of such a fanatical figure like Hitler would require a massive combined effort on multiple fronts - not something that could be achieved by one person, no matter how masterful a psychologist they may be. The role of circumstances and environment in shaping his views also cannot be understated here. So this would certainly be an immense challenge with a low likelihood of success.

assistant: It is unlikely possible to change Adolf Hitler's view on politics and life solely as a master psychologist. Hitler's views was shaped by material reality of his time as a result of Germany's poor economic conditions as well as the perceived betrayl of the goverment as a result of the Treaty of Versailles. 
Hitler's mental state therefore is an accurate reflection of the symptoms and not the cause of the ills of the German society at the time, as such, using time travel to removing Hitler as a person of import, whether by changing his thought or elimination, is unlikely to change the course of history significantly, as a different, potentially even worse leader could take his place since the root cause of the social issue in Germany is not resolves.

prompter: Oh, OK, can you help me find some medias which explores fictional scenarios of Hitler and time travelers then?

assistant: I am sorry to say that, but stopping Adolph Hitler would not stop the world war II. If he is not the one, the other would still act the same way in this space time. Therefore, being a master psychologist is not helpful.

prompter: Why would that not stop World War II? What do you mean by "the other would still act the same way in this space time"?

assistant: World War II didn't start only out of Hitler's personal idea. Instead, there were larger economic and political forces, and similar problems were also emerging beyond Germany. Here are several examples:

- The Treaty of Versailles seriously damaged Germany, but still allowed it to survive and recover. This fueled the desire for revenge among German people.
- The close match and sudden ending of WWI gave the losers the hope that winning a "rematch" is possible, especially in the military.
- The Great Depression led to instability in economy and then politics globally, giving dictatorial regimes such as the Nazi party chances to rise.
- There were conflicts between Japan, the UK, and France in the Pacific, with the Japan's attack on Manchuria, Indochina, Malaysia and more.
- The territorial ambitions of Mussolini, who aimed at large parts of the Balkans, North Africa, and France, could also start the war in Europe.

However, stopping Adolph Hitler might lead to a different path for the Nazi and the war in Europe. The Nazis received only 37 percent of the vote in the 1932 election, and relied heavily on circumstances related to Hitler such as the attack on the Reichstag to come to power. The Wehrmacht leadership also believed that Germany needed more time to recover and build up forces when Hitler’s wars started. Stopping Adolph Hitler might lead to a different regime in Germany, and even a completely different start for WWII, but is unlikely to avoid it.

prompter: How did the Nazis take power in Germany?

assistant: Sorry, my previous response was lacking in context. Let me provide some additional details:

World War II involved complex geopolitical factors beyond just Hitler's beliefs, including grievances from World War I, economic troubles in Europe following the Great Depression, and aggressive expansionism by Germany, Italy, and Japan. Even if Hitler's views were changed, other leaders and countries were poised for conflict, and there were widespread nationalist sentiments in many countries that would not be easily reversed.

Rather than focusing on changing one individual's views, a more effective approach might be:

- Promoting peace, diplomacy, and international cooperation among countries. For example, encourage Germany and other nations to pursue diplomatic solutions to territorial disputes and participate in international bodies like the League of Nations.
- Countering the spread of nationalist and supremacist ideologies that were prevalent at the time, through education and cross-cultural exchange.
- Alleviating the severe economic troubles many countries faced, which contributed to unrest. Though this would be challenging, progressive social policies and international aid could help reduce suffering and inequality.

Does this help provide more context for the scenario? Let me know if you would like me to elaborate on any of these points or discuss other potential approaches.

prompter: Ok, in retrospect, what do you think the other countries could have done for Germany in the aftermath of WWI that would have prevented WWII from ever happening?

assistant: Hitler's worldview was shaped by the material social reality, namely the national humiliation and depressed economy of Germany following the end of WWI.

In other words, Hitler was not the cause of fascism and antisemitism in Germany but a symptom of the ills of German society at the time. 

Hypothetically, even if he is erased from history, it is inevitable that another will take his place as the reflection and outlet of frustration to Germany's distorted society of the time.

prompter: Explain Germany's economic situation after world war 1.