assistant: This is a very complex issue because human nature itself is a very complex thing. When you are dealing with any societal issue, each individual matters, and can influence the group. A single human brain has 86 billion neurons, and these affect each person differently and makes each one very unique, needing different things. It would be hard to give the most efficient way, without knowing more about the society that is being influenced. So instead, here are some things that often improve both of these in society. It is also important to understand, that no answer to this question is without some Bias, even from an AI, AI is trained by humans, and can contain the Bais of the trainers.

1st. Create a place where knowledge, feelings, and info can be safely shared, and exchanged. This does not mean just the majority or just the minority, If you have 100 people who know nothing about a subject, and all agree on a point, they can still be incorrect compared to 1 expert. However the expert can be wrong as well, so being able to communicate un-infringed is most likely the most important thing for any society. Ideally, This includes things that hurt feelings, however, the space still needs to be safe, so some level of balance needs to be maintained. It is important to be inclusive of all viewpoints, even the ones that we do not agree with or even the ones that may hurt society as a whole. This fosters an environment where people are not afraid to share their viewpoints, and viewpoints can be debated freely. Thus creating change, if an individual feels they can not share their views, they will remain stagnant and thus likely to act on their own Bias. Most likely hurting society more than if they had been allowed to share.  

2nd. Create a place where individuals can be responsible and willing to be responsible. This allows each individual to feel connected to the social experience as a whole, and that makes them more invested in helping as much as possible. This is why individual Liberty is so important. If you start removing or isolating an individual or group, they often rebel, and fight the system in place. This creates a system that is in chaos and makes it more difficult to maintain order. Thus Reducing the ease of improving societal governance. This can be done by removing limitations and even allowing people to struggle some but with a safety net so they do not reach a point of desperation. So again some level of balance needs to be maintained. In order to create an environment where an individual is willing to be responsible, is doable by making sure that punishments are not too harsh, and by helping those who have made mistakes recover from those mistakes. 

3rd. Teach compassion, understanding, and acceptance, of all things, including hate. All systems, human or otherwise have a degree of imperfection, these imperfections much like differences are often a cause of hate, pain, and violence. The more an individual can foster forgiveness, compassion, understanding, and acceptance, the less likely they are to act unfairly, and may even solve some of the societal problems without needing to govern more. For example, let's say you have a man, who has fallen down on his luck and really needs diapers for his son. He may rob a store. In one case, someone laughs at him, this only makes him feel more distant, thus increasing the likelihood of him Robbing a store. In the other case, if someone offers him money or a job, this may prevent it. Likewise, if he does Rob, if you punish him for it, without helping solve the problem, he feels the system is unfair, and will likely continue the behavior, or may even escalate. It is also however important to balance this with number 2 above.

prompter: Could you summarize the previous points of the message and add another point to the list?

assistant: 1. Foster free exchange of knowledge, feelings, and ideas but balancing with the need to have safe the environment.
2. Maintaining a balance between the society safety net and people being in control of their own destiny (which includes the possibility of them making mistakes).
3. Teach compassion, understanding, and acceptance.
4. Create conditions, where people could freely enter or leave religious, political, sport or any other kind of groups.

assistant: Implementation of a fluid democracy would extend the legislative decision making to the people allowing them to collectively influence their destiny without the oversight of elites.

prompter: What governments are the best at promoting individual liberty?

assistant: As a language model AI, I do not have opinions, but here are some examples of governments that are generally considered to promote individual liberty:

Switzerland: Switzerland has a long-standing tradition of political and civil liberties, and is often considered one of the best examples of a country that promotes individual liberty.

Canada: Canada has a strong commitment to individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press.

New Zealand: New Zealand is known for its strong commitment to individual liberties and has a long history of protecting civil rights and freedoms.

Germany: Germany is a federal republic with a strong commitment to individual rights and liberties, including the protection of privacy and freedom of speech.

Australia: Australia is a federal parliamentary democracy with a strong commitment to individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press.

It's important to note that individual liberty can vary within different regions and contexts, and that it's not always a straightforward or easily quantifiable concept.

assistant: There are many different types of individuals, and their liberties often aren't compatible. The liberty of corporations and billionaires to create monopolies and gouge prices can infringe on the liberty of the poor to access important services. In Norway the people have a right to a state-sponsored education, healthcare plan and unemployment benefits. This grants individuals from all economic backgrounds greater liberty to choose how to live their lives. On the flip side, Norwegians can only chose to study at a public high-school or a private one run for religious reasons. The USA has lots of providers for important services and also unbridled availability of firearms, but abortions are highly regulated and illegal in some states. In short, individual liberty is a hard to define concept and different perspectives on what liberties and rights people deserve to have will determine the government and set of policies one will prefer. Generally speaking, unregulated economies favour those with economic means to take advantage of the financial liberty, while a regulated marked and public services grant the majority of citizens the freedom to live dignified lives.

assistant: This is a very difficult question to answer. There are many countries that boast that they represent freedom although the marketplaces in their system speak otherwise.