Topic: Social media platforms should be regulated by the government

Argument: Asking governments and institutions to be more active in enacting specific regulation for the internet is opening the door to disaster.

Argument: but many people would feel that they are losing their privacy and freedom of expression

Argument: By no means can we allow the government to regulate our social networks since this is a means of communication where there must be a lot of privacy

Argument: Freedom of speech should not be taken away.

Argument: government control of social networks can be partial or in favor of their political campaigns through advertising on these platforms

Argument: Government regulation of social media prevents people from expressing their freedom of speach.

Argument: Government regulation of social media would be harmful to democracy

Argument: governments should never regulate social media It is a topic of world discussion

Argument: I do not agree because the government is very corrupt and could take advantage of this to take advantage in many areas

Argument: I do not agree that the social media platform is regulated by the government since it would be coercing the freedom of opinion

Argument: I do not agree, since each person is free to express himself on social networks as he wishes and cannot see an impediment.

Argument: I do not think it should be regulated by the government, as they are used normally for personal use and for fun

Argument: i think it will be easy the the government to take our own information, and spy on us. so no i wouldn't like that

Argument: If the government is given full control of regulating social media platforms, it could become a threat to democracy and free expression.

Argument: It is against freedom of expression.

Argument: it is dangerous because the government will be tempted to use it to its advantage

Argument: It is impossible to violate communication rights if social platforms are regulated, there is freedom of expression and it must be respected

Argument: It should not be regulated because it would eliminate the liberty of Internet.

Argument: It shouldn't because it is something private where people can express themselves share ideas

Argument: It shouldn't, it wouldn't be freedom of expression.

Argument: It shouldn't, they are private companies, what you should do is monitor their content

Argument: it would be a bit weird to have the government behind you watching and controlling everything you do

Argument: It would be a double-edged sword, since politicians in general want to have full control, and since I believe that freedom of expression would be lost and there would be many restrictions

Argument: no, it is not necessary, each social network should take care of it

Argument: No, the internet does not need new laws. You need those that already exist to be fulfilled. The only logical way to approach internet regulation is to do so from social consensus.

Argument: No, this would be a direct attack on freedom of expression