Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: vocational education can be useful to students and they cant all afford to pay for their own education. students should also be offered vocational education if they arent academic to learn new skills

Argument: vocational education can teach individuals skills required to fill certain trades right away.

Argument: vocational education creates a path to well paying jobs for people who are not suited to conventional education

Argument: Vocational education forces people down a specific career track at a time when they are incredibly young ad have little real understanding about how that decision will impact them.

Argument: vocational education funds would be better used in higher education which is more important as the workplace becomes more computerized

Argument: vocational education gives adults that can't afford to go to college, or can't learn in a typical college, a chance to learn skills for the betterment of himself and society.

Argument: vocational education gives individuals the skills they need to obtain good paying jobs

Argument: vocational education helps students who don't do well in traditional education

Argument: vocational education helps to develop the skills of young people

Argument: vocational education helps to provide jobs to people who simply aren't interested in traditional post-secondary education

Argument: vocational education helps train people for work.

Argument: vocational education is a choice, there's no need to subsidize it anymore than there is general education.

Argument: vocational education is a critical way of training persons to do work that is becoming hard to find people to do. subsidizing the education helps train people to fill a vital societal need.

Argument: vocational education is a great return on investment

Argument: vocational education is a greaty alternative to traditional schools and should be more accessible.

Argument: vocational education is a hands on learning enviornment where job skills can be learned on the job and therefore doesn't need to be subsidized.

Argument: Vocational education is a lifeline for persons who cannot access a college education.

Argument: vocational education is a more affordable route than college with a better payoff usually

Argument: vocational education is a vital component that creates educated workers in areas that are required in communities and the government should subsidize these areas to ensure its continuity.

Argument: vocational education is ensuring the future of parts of the workforce that will not be automated in the future and protecting against future labour shortages

Argument: vocational education is essential to fill gaps in society for example where there is a lack of builders, plumbers and other tradesmen.

Argument: vocational education is extremely important for people to find out if they wish to work in a specific field or not and therefore subsidising it would help with this.