Topic: We should ban human cloning

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it allows designer humans to be grown according to the parents wishes.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it allows for governments to expoit these humans or copy existing humans creating a moral crisis.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it can be possibly be used in the wrong ways by governments, military organizations, or big private corporations.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it crosses too many moral and legal lines and truly offers no benefits to the one that is the clone.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it interferes with nature

Argument: human cloning should be banned because it would make it impossible to tell one apart from another causing legal issues for both of them.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because not enough research has been done around it.

Argument: human cloning should be banned because of the severe ethical difficulties it creates

Argument: human cloning should be banned because the ethical problems it creates are too difficult to overcome

Argument: Human cloning should be banned because we don't know what the long term health effects are for a human being.

Argument: human cloning should be prohibited because every human being is authentic and does not resemble anyone, god created unique and unrepeatable people

Argument: human cloning should not be banned a sit can be valuable in medicine, for transplantation and experimentation

Argument: human cloning should not be banned as it the next step in medicine and will allow for transplantation to be simpler and easier to perform

Argument: Human cloning should not be prohibited because these are scientific advances that benefit humanity

Argument: human cloning shows us pushing the boundaries of science to their fullest potential. think of all we can learn if we perfect cloning. it shows how far man has come and can continue to go.

Argument: human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditions

Argument: human cloning will cause an unfortunate life to endure lots of suffering and pain against their own will

Argument: human cloning will end up with individuals who only exist as a means to an end, which is deeply unethical.

Argument: human cloning will lead to individuals that are seen more as property than sentient humans, which is unethical.

Argument: human cloning will lead to scientific advancements that will save lives and as such, should not be banned

Argument: human cloning will provide necessary organs when there are few resources

Argument: human cloning will save millions of lives by using them as experimental subjects or for organ donation

Argument: human cloning will save the humanity from decline. edited persons will be free from diseases so should live longer than naturally born persons

Argument: human cloning will spread disease and cause abnormalities in the population

Argument: human cloning would allow infertile couples to have children developed from their own cells