Topic: We should abolish the three-strikes laws

Argument: this law is good for young people who would learn their lesson and become good adults

Argument: three strike laws can help lower crime rates

Argument: three strikes laws are perfectly constitutional since the punishment isn't unusual and they are proportional to frequency of crime if not intensity of criminal action.

Argument: three strikes laws make people less likely to be repeat offenders due to harsher punishments.

Argument: three strikes laws unfairly target non violent offenders when they get multiple drug charges

Argument: three-strike laws ensure that serious repeat offenders are dealt with as strongly as possible to ensure the safety of the public and punish their crimes accordingly.

Argument: three-strikes laws are overly draconian, and result in overcrowded prisons and judicial miscarriages.

Argument: three-strikes laws have been proven to lower crime rates, since they act as an excellent deterrent to unlawful behaviour across the spectrum.

Argument: three-strikes laws makes criminals less likely to reoffend.