Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: there are not enough safe-guards that oversee private military companies from producing under-par products and they should be banned.

Argument: There's too many controversies surrounding companies using private military contractors. These are not professional people in the business. Too many deaths are associated with these groups.

Argument: these companies make millions in a private sector and they are not necessary.

Argument: these companies provide the additional security we might need.

Argument: these pmcs are bound by their own rules and can cause trouble

Argument: they are basically mercenaries and often violate international law.

Argument: they are not held accountable in the same way regular armies are. it has been reported that some of these companies don't follow the rules of engagement thus committing crimes.

Argument: they are regulated differently and might not act according to standard rules

Argument: they can go where an official government entity cannot

Argument: they go against international laws and lead to an increase in violence and civilian casualties.

Argument: they have no need in society today with the amount of military we have

Argument: they just care about money and usually not care about innocent civilians and people who safer in the war.

Argument: they may sell weapons to countries that would use them inappropriately

Argument: they provide a valuable service that goes above and beyond what our military can do.

Argument: they provide a valuable service when there are not enough people wanting to enlist in the armed forces

Argument: they provide useful additional support to armies

Argument: they should not be banned. just better regualted.

Argument: this helps cover more issues; the current government is too short staffed to deal with all of the problems.

Argument: using private military companies is no different to buying weapons or vehicles from private companies.

Argument: we are already pouring so much into our defense budget, why is there even a need for these companies? it is wasteful.

Argument: we need private military companies to keep the field competitive and inspire more creativity in the area.

Argument: we need the private military companies instead of having to exhaust our military and putting them in direct danger so that they can not protect our own country.

Argument: we need to worry about our troops out there representing us, not a private company.

Argument: we should ban private military companies as any thing that requires the support of the military should be organized and aligned together for success.

Argument: We should ban private military companies as they are not trained and subject to the same scrutiny as the military.

Argument: We should ban private military companies as they do not abide by the same regulations and standards as state armies.

Argument: we should ban private military companies as they shouldn't protect for financial gain