Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights as they inhibit the creativity of artists who would use previous work for inspiration.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because it can get very expensive

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because it discourages new ideas.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because it mostly just helps the rich get richer

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because it will make a fairer playing field

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because once the property is put out there, everyone should have the right to use said property.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because the creation of a product does not make any money, the marketing and sale does.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights because we never can truly know that someone came up with something.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights so that everyone can share property which increases harmony in society

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights so that more people can benefit.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights to break to the barriers if innovation, barring people from building on and improving ideas is counter productive

Argument: we should abolish this because it could give someone a monopoly in the certain inductural sector and give them the unfair chance.

Argument: we should abolish this because it hinders smaller businesses into growing from the beginning and outright stops competition.

Argument: we should ban intellectual property rights because not everyone sees issue such as copyright in the same way. there can be loopholes which people abuse.

Argument: we should get rid of these property rights because they take away from others ideas.

Argument: we should have free and open discourse of all ideas. intellectual property prevents this and stunts our collective growth.

Argument: we should have intellectual property rights so a company can protect their ideas.

Argument: we should keep intellectual property rights because if a person came up with an idea, they should receive credit for it no matter what the circumstances are, it is only fair.

Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights as people should be able to profit from the developments that they make.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights as they protect the income of people who need them to make a living.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because a product belongs to it's creator and no one else.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because abolishing intellectual property rights of individuals would severely cripple the creativity necessary for achievements in many different areas

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because an individuals should be able to keep the property they create solely for their own benefit and not the benefit of the whole world.