Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: a person or business has a right to profit or use their own invention, idea, process etc without fearing someone stealing it.

Argument: a person uses his imagination and hard work to write as book or music. they should be able to benefit from their work. it should not be in the public domain.

Argument: a song or writing are works of art and their creators should benefit from them

Argument: abolishing intellectual property rights allows people to do great things.

Argument: abolishing intellectual property rights removes the financial incentive to innovation.

Argument: abolishing intellectual property rights will give people more access to information

Argument: abolishing intellectual property rights will help people to use everything what can find it useful without worry about copyrights.

Argument: abolishing intellectual property rights would damage the economy since there would be less incentive to bring new and innovative products to market

Argument: an individual uses his thoughts to develop ideas which are then put into a book or song. that individual should be able to profit from his work.

Argument: Another person might be able to make a concept work far better than the original person who thought up the idea.

Argument: art would probably be a lot better without intellectual property rights

Argument: businesses need to protect their advancements and therefore intellectual property rights must be maintained and needs to be protected by law.

Argument: by abolishing these rights, the livelihood of the creators is severely threatened.

Argument: companies and individuals spend a long time often even years developing services and products , they will have spent a lot of their own money too and need the chance to recoup this.

Argument: companies invest billions into research, if there are no rights it would dissuade companies from conducting research in the first place.

Argument: copyright laws protect artistic creations.

Argument: creative property is just as important as physical work and should be protected

Argument: creators have the right to profit from their ideas.

Argument: each person or institution owns their innovations, therefore they must be the owners of the income they generate and there must be intellectual property rights.

Argument: eliminate intellectual property rights could lead to plagiarism at all levels of the arts

Argument: enforcing property rights is almost impossible when companies in numerous countries do not enforce the rules very well such as china etc so it is easier just to abolish them

Argument: for multiple reasons the right of intellectual property should not be abolished since it gives others the participation of making their intellect known and putting it into practice in various activities

Argument: having intellectual property rights hinders progress and stops other people developing and improving projects

Argument: i think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because respect to the author

Argument: i think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights for their hard work