Topic: We should subsidize journalism

Argument: we should subsidize journalism because it can be very helpful in getting important information to people

Argument: we should subsidize journalism because it is essential that we have access to news and events around the world. without journalism there will be massive corruption and less intelligence.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism because it plays an important role in our society by keeping us informed of current events with facts and background information.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism because it will help guarantee good honest reporting.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism because it's a job market that's needed and financially in trouble because of free online news sources.

Argument: We should subsidize journalism because we need to keep local journalism alive so people are aware of what is going on in their community, but small news papers are struggling the most.

Argument: We should subsidize journalism so that journalists can cover the most important issues, rather than only the most profitable ones.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism so that we can continue to receive quality media.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism so they can do a lot of a better job in reporting news and what they are reporting can be controlled

Argument: We should subsidize journalism to allow more women and people from disempowered groups to enter this once very white, male career.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism to ensure media has the proper means to get the correct answers to the public.

Argument: we should subsidize journalism to gain a new market of information.

Argument: We should subsidize journalism to help them to cover more stories real stories with facts more efficiently and to reach more people about important issues in our day to day life from politic to the world issues

Argument: we should, if it's subsidised it could mean better journalism

Argument: we shouldn't subsidize journalism. there are plenty of people who can privately fund journalism if they wish and keep us informed. there are more important causes to invest in than government journalists

Argument: when journalism is subsidized it is less likely they will report anything negative about the source they are receiving funding from therefore distorting the facts

Argument: when you subsidize journalism you are making the reporting agency less likely to report anything bad about the place that is providing the funding. therefore you are getting less accurate news.

Argument: Without journalism people have no way of having the information that empower them to make informed voting decisions, making journalism central to democracy and therefore in need of subsidization.