Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: There is a current stigma in society that says that all high school graduates should go to college, and this subsidy would help fight that stigma and drive people towards valuable career fields.

Argument: there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields

Argument: There is a national shortage of tradesmen and subsidizing vocational education would help reduce that shortage.

Argument: there is a shortage of people working in the vocational fields and subsidizing them could do away with the shortage.

Argument: there is a shortage of tradesmen in our region; subsidising vocational education would mean that more tradesmen would fill this skills gap.

Argument: there is no need to subsidize vocation education because most trade jobs are being replaced by robots anyways.

Argument: there is to much focus on academic routes of education and a shortage of people with vocational and technical skills that provide a more viable route into employment

Argument: this can be unfortunate to some families as they would push their child into vocational education instead of university disregarding their wants

Argument: those who work and pay for their education are more apt to do better then those who are subsidized.

Argument: those who work with their hands will always be needed, so their education should be subsidized

Argument: too few people choose a trade. subsizing it would make it more appealing to people in a time when they are most needed.

Argument: too many providers of vocational education, such as for-profit colleges, do not meet the standards of government subsidization.

Argument: too many students were encouraged to go to university, with the result that degrees were steadily devalued; subsidizing vocational education would result in a similar glut, to nobody's benefit.

Argument: too much subsidy is already provided for other areas of education.

Argument: training individuals in a trade is empowering and helps the community

Argument: vocation education is essential for people not going to college

Argument: vocation educational is limited in the skills being provided to youths. the teachings they get could be outdated in just a few years which will put the learners in unemployment

Argument: vocation educational works to reduce unemployment among less-educated youths. subsidizing it will get more youths to get jobs and develop the economy

Argument: vocational education allows students who aren't suited to traditional college educations to learn skills needed for the workforce

Argument: vocational education allows those who may not have access to the workplace the opportunity to flourish

Argument: vocational education allows to develop citizens with skills still necessary for our society

Argument: vocational education can be subsidized by private companies, we should not assume that expense