Topic: We should end racial profiling

Argument: racial profiling  is discriminatory to minorities. you can't just assume because someone is of a certain race that they automatically would be the one to commit the crime.

Argument: racial profiling can be beneficial in medical research as it has been identified that some drugs work better on white patients and some on blacks

Argument: racial profiling can be more misleading than accurate and can discriminate against minority groups

Argument: racial profiling can potentially stop violent crimes

Argument: racial profiling creates animus between minority groups that are targeted and society at large, usually in the name of giving a false sense of safety or security.

Argument: racial profiling creates distrust between people of color and police.

Argument: racial profiling damages the credibility of law enforcement officers, as well as the public's trust in them.

Argument: racial profiling discriminates minorities unfairly, causing feelings of shame and anger that can in themselves cause violence and hate.

Argument: racial profiling distracts police from using actual evidence to catch criminals, as they are focused on skin color instead

Argument: racial profiling does no one any good. it should be ended.

Argument: racial profiling does not guarantee that a crime will be prevented or stopped.

Argument: racial profiling encourages the reinforcement of stereotypes and can lead to minorities being unfairly targeted.

Argument: racial profiling goes against what our justice system is based on - that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

Argument: racial profiling has been proven to be an effective tool in preventing crime

Argument: racial profiling has been used to target minority groups that are often victims of police brutality and harrassment.

Argument: racial profiling has helped the government to prevent terrorist attacks, based on their ethnic background. when done right it can help to save hundreds, even thousands of innocent lives

Argument: racial profiling has put a lot of criminals behind bars

Argument: racial profiling helps law enforcement detect threats in time

Argument: racial profiling is  used to keep everyone safe.  if someone is not doing anything wrong, then racial profiling won't affect them.

Argument: racial profiling is a blatant act of discrimination.

Argument: racial profiling is a fair trade off if it means potentially saving one life

Argument: racial profiling is a form of racism, and such discriminatory approaches lead to a worsening of relations between minorities and law enforcement agencies.

Argument: racial profiling is a good use of security budget by profiling those that are most capable of committing crimes. thus facilitating criminals and advancing security

Argument: racial profiling is a necessary tool when fighting terrorism. statistically certain groups commit more atrocities and this needs to be taken into account when  allocating resources.

Argument: racial profiling is a preconceived idea of people that views an entire race as criminal

Argument: racial profiling is a proven way of identifying criminals due to characteristics