Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: nuclear weapons are dangerous when possessed by a country that places no value on human life

Argument: nuclear weapons are deadly and eventually we might need them.

Argument: nuclear weapons are effective in creating a stand-off between counties that have them. this can result in less people dying.

Argument: nuclear weapons are expensive to maintain

Argument: nuclear weapons are good for no one.

Argument: nuclear weapons are important in the fight against those who want to hurt their enemies

Argument: Nuclear weapons are much less costly than the massive numbers of conventional weapons which would be required to replace them.

Argument: nuclear weapons are needed as a prevention measure.

Argument: nuclear weapons are not needed in war fare, they wipe out the innocent people as well as the enemy.

Argument: nuclear weapons are one of the biggest threats facing humanity today. abolishing them would eliminate that threat.

Argument: nuclear weapons are only safe if the leaders in charge can be trusted. it would only take one leader to destroy the whole planet.

Argument: nuclear weapons are the most dangerous thing on earth and should be abolished

Argument: nuclear weapons are the only thing keeping some countries from fighting.

Argument: nuclear weapons are the only thing keeping some countries safe from another country. getting rid of them would cause immediate deaths from the resulting wars.

Argument: nuclear weapons are the only way to achieve order

Argument: nuclear weapons are too dangerous to keep. we must get rid of all of them or face a nuclear winter.

Argument: nuclear weapons are too dangerous to keep. we need to rid our world of their threat.

Argument: nuclear weapons are very volatile and should be done away with.

Argument: nuclear weapons become more and more of a threat as they age and more countries seek to acquire them as well as terrorists as the weapons proliferate.

Argument: nuclear weapons being around is a big reason wars have not started.

Argument: Nuclear weapons can be fired remotely. They do not require a battlefield presence and thus are not a direct threat to personnel.

Argument: Nuclear weapons can bring about a certain level of respect

Argument: Nuclear weapons can bring the human society as we know it to an end. Things so dangerous should not exist!

Argument: nuclear weapons can eliminate large populations of people

Argument: nuclear weapons cause wars and are not a sufficient deterrent

Argument: nuclear weapons create unnecessary political tension

Argument: nuclear weapons create unnecessary political tensions

Argument: nuclear weapons development leads to other non-combative discoveries, such as nuclear energy.

Argument: Nuclear weapons do not keep the peace; they breed fear and mistrust among nations.

Argument: Nuclear weapons encourage global stability and increase peace.

Argument: Nuclear Weapons have a capacity to wipe out an entire nation

Argument: nuclear weapons have ensured that there has not been a third world war because of the destructive threat