Topic: Entrapment should be legalized

Argument: entrapment convinces people to commit a crime when they normally wouldn't and should not be legal.

Argument: entrapment is a breach of individual rights

Argument: entrapment is a slippery slope we should stay off of.  too easy to make a criminal instead of catching one.

Argument: entrapment is considered a crime that is previously committed by the police and you are forced to continue the crime.

Argument: entrapment is encouraging offences to be committed, which is immoral

Argument: entrapment is in essence encouraging a crime, and as such is surely indirectly a criminal offence in itself.

Argument: entrapment is unfair and startles drivers at the last minute.

Argument: entrapment is unfair to people who would not otherwise commit crimes it should remain illegal

Argument: entrapment is wrong since a person is almost coerced into committing a crime. it's cruel and wrong to trick a person into committing a crime.

Argument: entrapment sets people up to fail and is simply, unfair.

Argument: entrapment should be legalized because it can be used in ways that are not abusive, like a police-run to catch a predator.

Argument: entrapment should not be allowed as it entices people to act in an unnatural way as a result of enticements of the police

Argument: entrapment should not be legalized because it creates an imbalance in favor of prosecutors.

Argument: entrapment should not be legalized because it is not necessary for the police to do their job, so we should defer to not infringing on people's freedom by entrapping them.

Argument: entrapment shouldn't be legalized because it is immoral to trick someone into committing a crime