Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: vocational education is extremely important to this country. kids learning a trade will later be able to get a job using what they learned. government should help schools financially cover these costs.

Argument: vocational education is important for students who might not be able to get jobs in another field

Argument: Vocational education is inferior to a general college education as a preparation for work and thus should not be subsidized.

Argument: vocational education is just as important as college education and should be funded just as well.

Argument: vocational education is just like college and people should have to pay for it.

Argument: Vocational education is key to getting more skilled workers,

Argument: Vocational education is most beneficial to the people with the least money which is why it should be subsidized.

Argument: vocational education is necessary to ensure that there is not a shortage of qualified trades people in the future, and a subsidy will make this a much more attractive option when deciding a career path.

Argument: Vocational education is not as expensive as pursuing an academic degree and does not need to be subsidized.

Argument: vocational education is not as important as academic subjects so we should not waste money by subsidizing it.

Argument: vocational education is outdated and keeps training people in industries that keep shutting down

Argument: vocational education is positive but to be subsidize from the government is wrong as there is other causes which should be subsidized.

Argument: vocational education is unhelpful traditional learning should be encouraged

Argument: vocational education is useful for the training of certain skills that can be taught in less than 2-4 years.

Argument: vocational education is very valuable and should be provided

Argument: vocational education isnt always useful as most of the skills taught are learnt through life experiences and the money spent on it can be spent on more academic study

Argument: vocational education needs to be subsidized because trade jobs are more in demand than ever.

Argument: vocational education offers training for real jobs in the real world, especially for those on which traditional college is not an option.

Argument: Vocational education provide valuable members of the workforce and important economic and social contributors, and since it provides a benefit to all, it is a worthwhile thing to subsidize.

Argument: vocational education provides skills necessary for the real world that also allow for immediate job placement upoon graduation.

Argument: vocational education provides students who are not suited for traditional college with a pathway to success

Argument: vocational education provides the training for valuable skills - money spent that will be return many times over in future economic prosperity.

Argument: vocational education provides valuable training that results in lucrative careers for those that may not be suited for college.

Argument: vocational education provides valuable, lifelong skills that can be monetised and help with a flourishing economy.