Topic: We should ban the use of child actors

Argument: a talented child should be able to pursue their dreams and help make a story come to life.

Argument: acting at a young age not only gives a child the experience that is needed but it also gives them confidence as well as making money that they can use for later on in life

Argument: acting can be a very prosperous career, and it would be a shame to take this option away if a child is truly willing to do it.

Argument: acting can be an amazing opportunity for children which could potentially lead to a full career.

Argument: acting exposes children to a variety of people and places, giving them valuable life experience they would not receive otherwise.

Argument: acting is an art and not a job so banning the use of children in acting roles is preventing children from exploring their creative ability in that area and should not be banned.

Argument: acting is an exhausting profession and deprives children of their childhood

Argument: acting is very trying. it places a huge strain on children, and many end up being abused or using drugs to escape the pressure.

Argument: Acting may be a dream for a child and we do not want to crush their dreams.

Argument: acting puts too much pressure on children and they are too young to handle it

Argument: acting takes away the opportunity for a child to be able to live their lives like a normal child

Argument: acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuits

Argument: and if we forbid it, who will play the role of the children? this is a decision only of parents and children, the government should not get involved

Argument: are we going to make movies without children at all? banning child actors does not seem reasonable in this billion dollar industry.

Argument: as long as child actors are protected and monitored, their participation in the acting industry should be allowed.

Argument: as long as it doesn't interfere with their schooling and they are well looked after i don't see a problem.

Argument: as long as protections are in place to care for vulnerable youngsters, child actors can be just as fulfilled and respected as their elders

Argument: as long as regulations are followed to protect the children, it should be allowed. they have an opportunity to save money for a head start on adulthood.

Argument: as long as the child is not forced and wants to act then they should be allowed

Argument: as long as the child really wants to do it and is being properly supervised, they should be allowed to act.

Argument: as long as there is proper protection for child actors there is no reason that they should not be able to perform on screen

Argument: Banning child actors would be denying many very talented young individuals from becoming something great from an early age.

Argument: banning child actors would impose serious limitations on the entertainment industry.

Argument: because children are put into acting at a very young age they are not able to make that decision for themselves, it is not always something they want to do, but what the parents want them to do.