Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: Property rights are essential as it encourages innovative thought and technological advances.

Argument: property rights give someone a monopoly enabling them to charge what they like.

Argument: removing ip rights would cause a free for all and no one will have the incentive to do anything since it can just be taken by someone else

Argument: since intellectual property is such covers such a broad spectrum, it is difficult to prove that rights have been infringed leading to lengthy legal cases and should, therefore be abolished.

Argument: somebody somewhere could get the same idea,song or something exactly the same which already been registered as intellectual property and will be unfair to them.

Argument: somebody was working hard to make something and then should be rewarded for it. that`s what intellectual property rights all about.

Argument: The advantages of abolishing intellectual property rights greatly outweigh the reasons not to, for instance it would massively enhance continuous development.

Argument: the product of human thought must be used by all, and everyone should have the right to improve the ideas that others have created.

Argument: there is much financial gain at stake here, the right country or persons should be the ones who benefit not those who steal for their own greed.

Argument: there is no reason to abolish these rights because, if a person came up with an idea, they should get credit for it

Argument: they just get in the way of freedom.

Argument: too many great ideas never get moved forward because often times the originator doesn't have the skill set to bring these ideas to fruition.

Argument: we cannot abolish intellectual property rights because artists and scientists need to have their ideas and innovations protected so that they can earn a living in their fields

Argument: We must not abolish the right of intellectual property, people strive hard to create and this must be recognized and protected.

Argument: we need intellectual property rights to protect those who have invested so much in research and technology to develop new things.

Argument: we need to abolish intellectual property rights and let people innovate and create without having to worry about who owns what

Argument: we need to do away with intellectual property rights so it doesn't slow down innovation

Argument: we need to protect the rights of copyright holders to safeguard the creative economy and should never open the market for rampant exploitation of recognisable content

Argument: we shoudn't abolish intellectual property rights because a person should have the rights to change and make plans on something that they own without worrying about someone else stepping in.

Argument: We should abolish because it can be a very expensive process as well as being time consuming. There's also the issues of intellectual property rights being given to works that don't deserve it.

Argument: we should abolish intellectual property rights as the law is very complex and it is very easy to infringe copyright.