Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: vocational education serves the public good.

Argument: vocational education sets people up for a useful job

Argument: vocational education should be free so that we get more people in the workforce.

Argument: vocational education should be no more subsidised than academic education

Argument: vocational education should be privately funded

Argument: vocational education should be subsidized as the majority of those studying would be from lower income families.

Argument: vocational education should be subsidized because all students don't necessarily need a college education and rack up lots of debt in four year colleges.

Argument: vocational education should be subsidized because it helps to manage education

Argument: vocational education should be subsidized to allow a skilled workforce to develop and grow.

Argument: vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.

Argument: vocational education should be treated as an alternative to college and as traditional college is not subsidized neither should vocational educational pathways .

Argument: vocational education should not be subsidized because it does not prepare people for the job market like graduates.

Argument: vocational education should not be subsidized because the students don't get a classical education and are thus not well rounded upon earning their degree.

Argument: vocational education should not be subsidized people should fund themselves

Argument: vocational education shouldn't be subsidized because it takes a lot of money out of people's pockets

Argument: vocational education teaches people a trade

Argument: vocational education teaches skills that will be eternally needed

Argument: vocational education trains people for low paying, dead end jobs

Argument: vocational education trains people with the types of skills that are becoming obsolete due to robotics and ai

Argument: vocational education will be too expensive and costly.

Argument: vocational education would enable people who do not wish to go to college obtain a career and be independent in life.

Argument: vocational jobs play a vital role in society, but not as many students are pursuing these careers. subsidizing vocational education allows schools to still afford to offer these courses.

Argument: Vocational schools are a more efficient form of secondary education as they skip the traditional liberal arts and general education courses of most universities, and instead focus on practical courses for a person's career.

Argument: vocational schools offer an excellent chance to develop some vital skills and careers in hands-on fields which don't' require traditional four-year academic training.

Argument: vocational skills such as hairdressing and baking should not be supported by public funds. if students want to learn these future careers they should pay for this education just as those going to college.

Argument: vocational studies are often overlooked in favour of more traditional studies leading to a shortage of people to work in vocational occupations that are essential.