Topic: Social media platforms should be regulated by the government

Argument: Social networks are the only area of ​​discussion where there is no censorship. If the State intervenes, this changes and the main fear is political censorship and freedom of expression

Argument: social networks have personal information which should not be controlled by the government

Argument: social networks must be free of any system

Argument: Social platforms should not be regulated by governments, it would remove the freedom of expression for citizens as well as a violation of their privacy.

Argument: That would be abusing the integrity and freedom of expression of all people

Argument: The control of what we say and think is our right, the media cannot and should not be regulated by the State, except for those messages that flagrantly violate laws

Argument: the fact that the government regulates social media platforms undermines freedom of expression and thought

Argument: The government already regulates too much of our lives.  People should have the freedom to post any ideas they want.  No one should stop this right.

Argument: the government cannot cover all topics on social media and sanction every citizen who participates in it

Argument: the government is corrupt and could take advantage of this

Argument: The Government should not regulate Social media as we need to have freedom of speech and the Government could use it as a platform to promote themselves

Argument: the problem is that they could use it for their own benefit

Argument: The regulation will limit the ability of platforms to promote freedom of expression

Argument: The social media platform should not be regulated by the government because it intrudes privacy

Argument: The social media platform should not be regulated by the government, if not by them, there is freedom of expression and that is what these networks are for

Argument: there are people who have a bad concept of the government and being watched will make it worse

Argument: they are a privates companies and shouldn't have to be regulated

Argument: They are private companies and therefore shouldn't be controlled by the government

Argument: They have too much power over people's life and they censor everyone who disagrees with the trending topic of the day, they also censor free speech and manipulate trends by stealing the user's data.

Argument: they must stop wanting to regulate everything, there are rights that cannot be violated such as freedom of expression

Argument: They should not be regulated because they are private companies and that would go against freedom of expression.

Argument: they should not do if social networks are private companies in which they should not interfere

Argument: They should not have any type of control in social networks, everyone is free to express what they want.

Argument: they souldn't be regulated because they  just offer a platform for people to communicate and share ideas and thoughts.

Argument: This deprives citizens to receive different points of view on the issues and form an independent opinion