Topic: We should prohibit women in combat

Argument: all citizens should be given equal opportunity. if a woman wants to support her country on the battlefield, she should be able to do so.

Argument: allowing women in combat gives us the numbers we need to be ready with trained soldiers for anything that might come up

Argument: an enemy can not attack to see that the opponent is a woman, an ally could act recklessly if the partner to save is a woman, as you see it is an abuse to the figure of the woman.

Argument: anyone who is physically qualified should be able to be in combat

Argument: as a whole, women are more emotional and may not be able to handle combat emotionally

Argument: as long as women are fully trained there are many roles that they can do equally as well as men. the main criteria for combat should be fitness not gender.

Argument: by allowing women in combat we are putting them at a higher risk than men because they are not as strong or fast in reacting therefore they are putting themselves and everyone around them in danger.

Argument: combat is never an individual against another individual and women are capable of using the same weapons as men as long as they are trained properly

Argument: combat is too brutal and harsh and women should be prohibited from it

Argument: due to their physical makeup women do not naturally have the strength that men do and they would be at an unfair disadvantage in combat

Argument: elimating women from combat situations flies in the face of gender equality - it is outdated to limit the participation of somebody purely based on sex, irrespective of how dangerous it may be.

Argument: Equal rights for women makes it obvious that they also have the equal right to be part of our combat forces.

Argument: female soldiers are as qualified for combat as the men who went through the same training

Argument: fields of war are not places for women

Argument: further progress must be made in ensuring and promoting the rights of women in all social fields, so it is a right to participate where women feel comfortable

Argument: gender should not matter when it comes to combat. as long as proper physical and mental tests are in place that iss all that should matter for selection.

Argument: given the characteristic of sensitivity generally present in the female gender, this could put at risk combat operations

Argument: having combat units comprised of mixed genders would be dangerous due to the divergence of physical abilities - they would cease to funtion smoothly, and decisions would be swayed by male protective instincts.

Argument: Having women in combat causes men to act differently than their training calls for endangering units.

Argument: if they can pass all training and everything what`s need to get involve in the combat, can`t see why they should not be in the combat?

Argument: if they want equal rights then they can serve and die

Argument: if they want equal rights they should be drafted and fight in wars just like men.

Argument: if women can pass all the tests required then they are fit for combat