Topic: We should fight urbanization

Argument: a city is the best place for people to have what they need near by

Argument: as the global population continues to grow, urbanization is required to ensure that there are enough houses and employment opportunities for society to function.

Argument: bigger communities bring more diversity.

Argument: cities bring everything closer together and make it easier to do everything as a result of that.

Argument: concentrating large number of people and resources increases pollution and lessons the feeling of wellbeing among it's citizens.

Argument: dense cities concentrate pollution.

Argument: funding is better utilised and services less spread out.

Argument: grouping people together as in urbanization, makes it easier to control crimes and puts them closer to necessary medical facilities.

Argument: growing housing numbers are needed as the population grows

Argument: helping people in having a houses and flats is obligatory for all of us with support from our government.

Argument: if we fight urbanization, then less people would be able to find jobs

Argument: if we fight urbanization, there would be less pollution

Argument: increasing urbanization can have negative impacts on the natural enviroment

Argument: it could provide more jobs and promote growth for businesses.

Argument: it creates congestion and pollution

Argument: it is better to encourage urbanization as it damage the countryside, wildlife and open spaces less

Argument: it is much easier to provide services to an urbanised area than a populus spread out over a great distance, making planning for services much simpler and cost effective.

Argument: it leads to the destruction of nature and our ecosystem

Argument: its good to keep everyone in an urban environment because less travel is needed and it helps the environment.

Argument: Lots of trees get cut down every year to make urban cities, that's bad for the environment

Argument: many of our natural habitats and ecosystems have been lost to urbanization, thereby rendering some many species of animals endangered

Argument: nature provides habitat to hundreds of native species. if urbanization continues, they will be at risk of extinction and once the damage has been done, it cannot be reversed.

Argument: no, we shouldn't fight urbanization for the peace of the world

Argument: people need houses, we need industry to give people a living and we need places for shopping and leisure. there is still plenty of green field land in the uk - we just need to utilize it better

Argument: people need to live somewhere so we have to expand

Argument: people should be allowed to go where they wish to live and work and inevitably they will wish to go to developed areas for greater job opportunities and amenities.

Argument: quick urbanization usually happens in unscrupulous ways with worker abuse and immense pollution.

Argument: services and resources can be better managed in an urban setting.

Argument: the more crowded a place become the more crime rises.