Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: private military companies earn their profits from war. they do not work for a country but for whatever individuals hire them there really is not a good oversight for what these companies do.

Argument: private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property.

Argument: private military companies give rise to some unethical practices as they are not under the same scrutiny as government military.

Argument: private military companies have a role in the armed forces, especially at a time when budgets and personnel are being reduced

Argument: Private military companies have an incentive to continue the military action so they should be banned

Argument: private military companies have no governmental controls and can attack people in their own country.

Argument: private military companies have no governmental controls and can do more harm then good.

Argument: private military companies have no oversight and thus can commit atrocities with no repercussions.

Argument: Private military companies have their bottom line as a priority rather than the safety of the country.

Argument: private military companies have their own agendas and are not always acting in our country's best interest.

Argument: private military companies help bring down the cost of military action by our government.

Argument: private military companies hire dedicated people to become soldiers; they are likely more skilled than the kids we send out onto the battleground now.

Argument: private military companies is bad for the military where spies and stealers pathway

Argument: Private military companies lack oversight and accountability. It is too dangerous to have a military bound to serve who pays it versus the ethical framework of serving the public good.

Argument: Private military companies lack the principles and morality of legislated military and are more prone to commits war crimes.

Argument: private military companies may not be on the same page as our government controlled military

Argument: private military companies might be engaged in times of conflict when regular national military service is not eunough

Argument: private military companies might interfere with the mission of the government's military in a location

Argument: private military companies of the same kind generate safe jobs, provide us with a service, and reinforce the public force to maintain order in society and protect citizens

Argument: private military companies offer a valuable service for instances where government military cannot do what needs to be done for fear or repercussions.

Argument: private military companies only exist to continue and profit from warfare. their operations are immoral and unlawful.

Argument: Private military companies only look towards making a profit not towards any patriotism.

Argument: private military companies only purpose is to make money and as a result they don't focus on protection as much as they should be.