Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: the u. s needs nuclear weapons, just having them prevents other countries from attacking us.

Argument: the united states, at least, needs nuclear weapons for protection in order to deter other countries from attacking.

Argument: the use of nuclear weapons is a good tool to guard against mutual destruction.

Argument: The use of nuclear weapons would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.

Argument: the use of weapons of such destruction can not be justified

Argument: there are many environmental concerns to be considered when using nuclear weapons.

Argument: there are still dangerous countries that don't possess nuclear weapons and that is what prevents them from attacking a country that has them

Argument: there has got to be a better way to solve conflicts than wiping out civilizations with nuclear weapons.

Argument: There is a risk of terrorists getting a nuclear weapon and creating a dirty bomb capable of destroying cities with millions of citizens.

Argument: there is no benefit to having nuclear weapons as they are violent and only cause problems

Argument: There is no justification for mass destruction. Therefore, nuclear weapons are inherently immoral. Same as private persons should not be able to own assault weapons, the states should be barred from creating and owning nuclear weapons.

Argument: there is no need for nuclear weapons anywhere in our world. they don't only destroy lives when used, but also nature in general. we are doing enough to hurt nature already.

Argument: there is no place in a peaceful world for nuclear weapons.

Argument: these weapons are immoral and shameful

Argument: these weapons could kill an entire state of people at once, they are too dangerous.

Argument: they are a valuable deterrant to having another world war.

Argument: they provide security in the form of mutually assured destruction

Argument: we can't guarantee that our enemies would not create them behind our back, and then obliterate us.

Argument: we can't trust every nuclear power to denuclearize, keeping some weapons in stock keeps peace.

Argument: we must fight to have a safe world for our next generations

Argument: we need to continue to fight to abolition nuclear weapons as there is no need to have weapons of mass destruction.

Argument: we need to stop creating and hoarding weapons that can potentially destroy the entire planet

Argument: we should allow for nuclear weapons for without it, the world will be tortured by people who have no morals and will slowly kill us all.

Argument: we should because they are extremely dangerous.

Argument: we should continue to support nuclear weapons because there will be a day our country will regret not having the bigger and better weapon to defend our country.

Argument: we should fight for the abolition nuclear weapons because of the dangers involved. misuse of nuclear weapons could lead to another world l war.

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons as no country needs to have weapons capable of doing that much harm to others.