Topic: Social media platforms should be regulated by the government

Argument: social platforms being regulated by the government would give fewer problems

Argument: social platforms must be regulated by governments to avoid hate crimes as well as political disinformation

Argument: Social platforms must be regulated by the government due to the variety of content that we can find in it, which there is little restriction to the user by the state

Argument: some governments have good quality measures and security, and will always keep the citizens safe

Argument: some media posters have posted blatant lies,  Some support insurrection.  The government must be responsible to step in and make sure social media posting is accurate.

Argument: The advantage of this is that many false news could be regulated that put the world on alert

Argument: the government always tries to fit everything together for the benefit of society, its rules in the networks may be of great benefit to each of the users

Argument: the government has all the power to control social networks to prevent false news from being generated and terrorist groups from being created

Argument: The government has and must control them, a corporate digital state cannot be allowed where the natural laws of civil society are not respected

Argument: the government must regulate social media platforms because many scams are committed through them

Argument: The media (including social media) can be a very powerful tool for culture, health and safety. It cannot exist without government control

Argument: The networks have been a constant debauchery for a long time so with the hand of the government it will improve

Argument: The question is not whether it is necessary to intervene, but the nature of the intervention that is required to preserve the benefits and avoid the damages that digital platforms have brought to the world.

Argument: The social media platform must be regulated by the government to be protected from theft

Argument: The social media platform must be regulated by the government, to prevent hateful content, violence among others

Argument: the state must implement measures to reduce risks on social media.

Argument: There are many dangerous people and groups on social media so the government should regulate them and eliminate those dangerous groups and people.

Argument: There are many existing risks in social networks, you have to exercise laws in the matter

Argument: There are many key benefits that social media in government can achieve—including social's role in awareness building and during times of crisis

Argument: There have been so many bad things arranged via social media that it is time it was regulated by the government to prevent harm to the masses.

Argument: There must be content regulation on social networks in order to avoid and sanction fake content and hoaxes that harm the population

Argument: They could control and do a good job in the networks and if they prevent both children and adults from seeing unwanted content