Topic: We should subsidize journalism

Argument: journalism is necessary to any society, to both report the news and keep people informed of important issues they may not be aware of otherwise.

Argument: journalism is still value by the older generation who are not connected to news sites online.

Argument: journalism is the backbone of a free society

Argument: Journalism is the heart of a nation development by spreading needed and vital information to the population. It's a noble duty which should gain recognition and more funding

Argument: Journalism is the only way to create government and other institutional accountability, since investigative journalists are the main people who explore cover ups and corruption, meaning it should be subsidized.

Argument: journalism keeps people informed about what is going on with their government

Argument: journalism must be subsidized by democratic governments to combat fake news propagated by corporations who don't have people's best interests in mind

Argument: journalism must be supported by the central government

Argument: journalism must reach all citizens and the central government must ensure that information reaches all corners of the nation

Argument: journalism needs funding to continue its important job of delivering information to the public.

Argument: journalism needs no help, there is a vast array of ways to get information and subsidizing it would only create polarization of information

Argument: journalism ought to be subsidized because few people are buying newspapers

Argument: Journalism plays an essential role as watchdog of democracy, and keeping citizens informed. Such a valuable industry deserves government subsidization.

Argument: journalism provides information and news so that we can know what is going on outside of our immediate area

Argument: journalism provides necessary information to the population

Argument: journalism provides people with accurate and up to date information that is essential to a positive well being.

Argument: journalism should be completely free and clear of government intervention

Argument: journalism should be free from bias and present facts no matter what. if subsidized news would. have an automatic bias towards whoever is funding it which leads to inaccurate reporting and doubtful audiences.

Argument: journalism should be funded by the government as it promotes learning and worldwide communication.

Argument: journalism should be subsidised to enable more publications to circulate giving a wider choice of view.

Argument: journalism should be subsidize to promote impartial news and rigorous work

Argument: journalism should be subsidized as the media is a important part of our democracy as it allows people to be more informed and clued up on all the issues in the world.

Argument: journalism should be subsidized because democracy can only function if the electorate is well informed

Argument: journalism should be subsidized to ensure people's voices are heard and represented.