Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to keep their creations or ideas all to themselves.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because information can be proprietary.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because it is a personal ideas, people work hard on the things they created and it is just not right people just take it and make it their own sometimes

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects individuals rights to their discoveries and inventions.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects that person's claim to their inventions and discoveries.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because it will be expensive for some poor people

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because it's not fair for people to steal a genius idea from someone else

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because people should get credit for their work.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights because that is someones idea and they should get credit for it.

Argument: we should not abolish intellectual property rights, they protect the creative works of every field, without them creators would have no ability to earn from their hard work since anyone could steal their ideas

Argument: we should not ban intellectual property rights because things such as copyright infringement would become a major issue when left unregulated.

Argument: We shouldn't abolish because intellectual property rights help the owners to protect their property and to keep their property from being stolen or replicated.

Argument: we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to be creative with their thoughts

Argument: we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because is important for economics

Argument: we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because it can help you gain a competitive edge against your competition

Argument: we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because it enhances the value of your company

Argument: we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because people should have the right to do what they want with their ow property

Argument: what is defined as intellectual property rights is to vague allowing people to state claim over copyright infringement for even common expressions in social media.

Argument: when a person creates a type of intellectual property, he has the right to own that property and dictate the use of it, since he is the one who made the effort to make that property.

Argument: will lead to an increase in copycat products

Argument: without intellection property rights there is no incentive to research and develop new products

Argument: without intellectual property rights creative people may not be able to make a living from their creativity. their work may then be lost as they have to take on other paying professions.