Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: private military companies can access places where terrorists are without the constriction of global law.

Argument: private military companies can be an asset.

Argument: private military companies can be much more advanced and skilled than our current branches of the military.

Argument: private military companies can be useful to countries who do not have their own military.

Argument: private military companies can cause great harm.

Argument: private military companies can do things the real military cannot, or be hired for short term assignments.

Argument: private military companies can go into areas and do things that we don't allow the government to do. therefore they add an extra layer of protection to society in addition to what the government can do.

Argument: Private military companies can have very specialized skills that the military can use so they can be helpful

Argument: private military companies can hold bias and due to past experiences and can result in dangerous sctivities for the wrong reasons.

Argument: Private military companies can keep the costs down for the national military freeing up some of their resources.

Argument: private military companies can move more quickly and secretly than government troops.

Argument: private military companies can operate in ways to keep us safe that the government isn't allowed to.

Argument: private military companies can provide many security benefits within our country

Argument: private military companies can save the government money

Argument: private military companies can serve as a deterrent to conflicts, increasing the chances of peace.

Argument: private military companies could be a danger to our national security because their motives are financial in nature which means they could act in ways that are not in our country's best interest politcally.

Argument: Private military companies could become uncontrollable and frighten governments. They are directed by private person that could be attempt to use these forces to direct coups

Argument: private military companies could have their own agenda which could be very dangerous

Argument: private military companies could lead to personal motives or agendas, which could be dangerous.

Argument: private military companies do a good service by providing security where needed

Argument: private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisoners

Argument: private military companies do not have to go through governmental red tape to spend money for training and equipment

Argument: private military companies do not operate to the same code of conduct as regular forces thus could commit acts that could be viewed as war crimes.

Argument: private military companies do some of the work our soldiers do so they can concentrate on more important roles