Topic: Foster care brings more harm than good

Argument: foster care allows a child to be removed from a potentially bad situation which is a very good thing.

Argument: foster care brings more good than harm it helps children in dire needs who otherwise die out on the street.

Argument: foster care brings more harm then good because unless they adopt you then they will forget about you just like your original family

Argument: foster care brings stability into the child life.

Argument: foster care can cause serious mental and emotional trauma for those in the system

Argument: foster care can help children recover for a short period of time, leaving them the opportunity to go back to their own families when possible.

Argument: foster care can provide very good homes to children in need.

Argument: foster care can put vulnerable children in contact with other children who have a criminal background.

Argument: foster care can reinforce feelings of uncertainty and instability

Argument: foster care can save children from diabolical situations at home.

Argument: foster care children often slip through the cracks and do not receive the care they need to become healthy, functioning adults when they age out of the system.

Argument: foster care creates socially withdrawn children since they go from family to family

Argument: foster care does not provide the same level of care and support like being at home with your own family.

Argument: foster care doesn't guarantee a close relationship and can cause neglect to the child.

Argument: foster care families become a dynamic support system to children and a safe and stable home where love for a child is demonstrated

Argument: foster care homes can be vital places for children who were in desperate situations to thrive

Argument: foster care is an unstable environment for kids, so that they never feel truly accepted or safe.

Argument: foster care is important to assist families.  they provide resources and support to the children when their parents are unable to care for them.

Argument: foster care is not good , because children are often bounced around from several different homes during their time in foster care & never become settled & stable

Argument: foster care is terrible because the kids are often treated poorly because the foster parents don't buy healthy food and take great care of them. the harms outweigh the benefits.

Argument: foster care is the best option for children needing to not be with their own family.  they're far superior to a group home setting.

Argument: foster care isn't a bad thing because it gives children a safe and temporary place to go.

Argument: foster care just passes children around like they are a burden instead of finding a home for them.

Argument: foster care provides a valuable service looking after children in temporary circumstances and is beneficial for children and families.

Argument: foster care provides children with much-needed stability and security, and foster parents do an excellent job of bringing these children up in a family environment

Argument: foster care provides homes for children that have nowhere else to go.