Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: Private military companies are less likely to exercise proper discipline or follow ethical rules of engagement in warfare.

Argument: private military companies are little better than mercenaries and should be treated in the same way

Argument: private military companies are more efficient and better trained than the government run military.

Argument: private military companies are needed to do the work that our soldiers should not do

Argument: private military companies are needed to provide security when the military can not do the job

Argument: private military companies are no different to weapons manufacturers. they provide a necessary service for the military.

Argument: private military companies are not regulated by government and their code of conduct might be violating human rights

Argument: private military companies are not subject to as much oversight as the actual military. additionally, they are costly and a waste of taxpayer money.

Argument: private military companies are not trained to handle situations like military and can be dangerous to themselves and others. the should be banned for the safety of all.

Argument: private military companies are nothing but hired guards. a company should be able to hire them because they provide a service that is needed.

Argument: private military companies are often run by former military men and women and provide a service that allows the military to concentrate on military operations.

Argument: private military companies are only in it for the financial gain

Argument: private military companies are only in the business for profit and not for the "best" for our country in it's interests and private military companies should be banned.

Argument: private military companies are only interested in making money.

Argument: Private military companies are only out for profit and not patriotism and should be banned.

Argument: private military companies are operated for profit rather than for the defence of nations.

Argument: private military companies are risky businesses that can backfire against government's military forces

Argument: private military companies are shady organizations that can easily be corrupted by money, especially from rogue nations.

Argument: private military companies are simply another one for a country to defend themselves against potential aggressors. if a company can perform a service and make money at it, good for them.

Argument: private military companies are there for profit only

Argument: private military companies are trained for combat and can assist the governmental military groups

Argument: private military companies are unstable.

Argument: private military companies are wrong and should be banned immediately. they are being paid to create war, not to help prevent it.

Argument: private military companies aren't regulated and have been linked to using mercenary tactics they operate for financial gains

Argument: private military companies benefit from government funds but operate without sufficient government oversight.