Topic: We should ban human cloning

Argument: human cloning would allow us to always have our loved ones.

Argument: human cloning would enable advances in medical research and shouldn't be banned.

Argument: Human cloning would provide a means of finding cures to many deadly diseases.

Argument: humans don't have the right to play god with genetics

Argument: I think human clones could be used for nefarious purposes in the wrong hands,like framing others for crimes.

Argument: if human cloning can lead scientists to improve the health of others and end some genetic disease then it should be allowed

Argument: if human cloning can provide answers or cures to diseases, we should not ban it.

Argument: if scientists are able to clone humans, you could have a child whose organs would be perfect for you if you needed a transplant

Argument: if we ban cloning we will not advance in science because we will be stopping a very important discovery.

Argument: if we begin to play god with our scientific advances that could very well lead to our demise.

Argument: individuality is lost when clones of people are running around and therefore it should be banned.

Argument: it can help with medical research and lead to the treatment and cures of many different diseases,

Argument: it could aid in finding cures for dieases

Argument: it could help lead the way to find a cure for certain diseases

Argument: it could lead to medical advances good for humanity

Argument: it is not known what negative effects human cloning may have on the human race.

Argument: it may lead to medical break throughs

Argument: scientific exploration should continue uninhibited.

Argument: scientific exploration should not be curtailed.

Argument: the cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailments

Argument: the concept of human cloning is totally against human nature. this is tampering with things man wasn't meant to be involved with. it goes against god's will and should not happen.

Argument: the medical implications of cloning are unknown.

Argument: the technology behind human cloning could lead to other breakthroughs and should be explored in a limited way.

Argument: the united nations discussed last week a proposal to impose a global ban on human cloning for reproductive purposes.

Argument: the world is already overpopulated, cloning humans will only contribute to this problem

Argument: the world is overpopulated as it is, introducing even more people in the form of cloning would only lead to more people fighting over resources to survive.

Argument: there are to many ethical problems and it would be nearly impossible to regulate

Argument: there are too many things that can go wrong and we should not allow human cloning

Argument: there has to be a limit on what science can ethically do and human cloning is a step too far and should be banned for fear of this science being missued.

Argument: there is a huge ethical dilemma on whether or not the clones have rights or even a right to live normally

Argument: there is a lot we can learn medically from human cloning and we should do it responsibly