Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: nuclear weapons have helped keep the peace in a dangerous and uncertain world for several decades

Argument: nuclear weapons have no place in the world today. it has been proven that nuclear weapons cannot be handled properly or securely and is a danger to the world.

Argument: nuclear weapons have proved to be an effective way of keeping peace between the superpowers

Argument: nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the entire human race and should be banned.

Argument: nuclear weapons have the capability to destroy civilization at a stoke, and are far too dangerous to be in the hands of any individual country.

Argument: nuclear weapons help to insure that other countries will not attach because they in turn will most certainly be destroyed.

Argument: nuclear weapons help to keep the peace between countries; abolition would potentially see some of the stock filter into terrorist hands, and become exponentially more dangerous.

Argument: nuclear weapons is dangerour for all people and should be banned

Argument: nuclear weapons kill thousands of innocent civilians, men, women and children.

Argument: nuclear weapons must be maintained as a deterrent to full scale nuclear war, as mutually assured destruction may very well prevent all out nuclear war.

Argument: nuclear weapons must not be used or manufactured, they are a threat to humanity

Argument: nuclear weapons not only are deadly but also cause horrible conditions to humans.

Argument: nuclear weapons present a balance between the great powers of the world.

Argument: nuclear weapons present a threat to global security when they are in the hands of dictators.

Argument: Nuclear weapons prevent conflicts from dragging onward because once they are used involved countries lose the motivation to continue fighting (re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

Argument: Nuclear weapons promote diplomacy as a solution to conflict.

Argument: Nuclear weapons provide a deterrent for starting a major conflict.

Argument: Nuclear weapons put everyone at risk and protect no one; there is no reason to keep them.

Argument: nuclear weapons should be abolished because it is an ongoing health risk

Argument: nuclear weapons should be abolished since it is inconceivable that they could be ever used because of the catestrophic consequences

Argument: nuclear weapons should not be abolished because they provide a safety net. rogue nations have fear of the power of nuclear weapons.

Argument: nuclear weapons should not be abolished because we need them to defend our country

Argument: nuclear weapons shouldn't exist and if used erroneously could destroy the planet

Argument: nuclear weapons stop countries from attacking those that hold them and therefore protect those countries.

Argument: nuclear weapons will destroy all life it is not banned.

Argument: nuclear weapons will eventually lead to the end of the world.

Argument: nuclear weapons will result in world destruction and should be abolished