Topic: We should ban human cloning

Argument: a person created through cloning could potentially have developmental problems caused by imperfections in the cloning process.

Argument: Allowing humans to be cloned is setting the world up for a lot of genetic confusion and mutations in the future.

Argument: because it's unethical and unnatural

Argument: by advancing cloning, scientists will have as many people as they want to use as test subjects and can find things to better enhance ours lives.

Argument: by cloning humans we could provide more organs for sick people needing organs.

Argument: by copying something you can not get a pure copy. each copy that is made is worse then the other meaning that no one knows what can happen with cloning.

Argument: by trying to clone humans scientists are trying to play god. experimenting on humans and trying to duplicate them could lead to consequences we can not even predict today.

Argument: can lead to many medical breakthroughs that may help cure and or treat many different disease

Argument: cloning an individual human is dangerous to the individuality of both original and clone.

Argument: cloning can mean cloning organs, not necessarily whole people, and cloned organs would save many lives as it would reduce rejection and save people who do not get a donor in time.

Argument: Cloning could benefit those that are unable to have a child, it could be used to clone great thinkers of our time like Einstein or other great people, It would advance science as well.

Argument: cloning could help fight genetic disease by cloning healthy cells

Argument: Cloning could lead to designer humans and we will lose the diversity of the human race

Argument: cloning could prevent defective genes from being passed

Argument: cloning human beings goes against nature with which we could have serious consequences in the future

Argument: cloning humans could devalue human life as a perfected clone could be preferable to a naturally made human.

Argument: cloning humans is immoral and has potential large genetic abnormality risks. science does not know enough about genes to ensure they wont mutate into a catastrophic anomaly.

Argument: cloning is controversial and it is against religious ethics

Argument: Cloning may bring many useful benefits to society, notably for medical research.

Argument: cloning might allow us to reproduce body parts such as livers, hearts, etc to help save lives of those who are desparately ill.

Argument: cloning of organs can and will save many lives, people who need organ transplants could be saved by cloning organs for them rather than waiting for others to die, cloned limbs would also help disabled people.

Argument: cloning science can lead to many other technological and medical breakthroughs that we would not have come across otherwise.

Argument: cloning will restrict the gene pool, reduce genetic diversity and and encourage recessive traits, many of which lead to illness and abnormalities.

Argument: cloning would have strict regulations on how to handle clones and ethical dilemmas. scientific advancements made while working towards cloning can advance the human race.