Topic: We should subsidize space exploration

Argument: mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediately

Argument: many of the technological advances brought about by space exploration have eventual benefits for society in general.

Argument: many scientific discoveries have come from space exploration.

Argument: money can be spent on more lucrative things such as feeding the hungry and providing homes. subsidizing space exploration can take away from that.

Argument: more money needs to be spent on improving the world we live on, reducing poverty, pollution, crime and disease rather than going off to places that are no use to humans at all.

Argument: nasa and other space organizations have developed many useful technologies in the pursuit of space exploration and should be subsidized.

Argument: no one owns space and it's bigger than imaginable. there's no reason to race to and dump money into space exploration right now. more important causes like our starving or impoverished citizens come first.

Argument: obligatory of all governments in the world must be subsidizing space exploration because we will learn how to defend our own planet.

Argument: our survival as a species depends on expanding into space so it should be subsidised.

Argument: our world will not hold all the people much longer. subsidizing space exploration will enable us to possibly colonize other worlds.

Argument: private corporations can fund this without using tax payers money who would rather it went to projects that actually benefit them in their daily lives

Argument: science is important and can be beneficial to society.

Argument: space exploratin gives us an advantage over other countries such as satellite usage to target enemy combatants and nuclear arsenals.

Argument: space exploration advances the frontiers of mankind, and could well discover new resources that will be invaluable due to the depletion of those on earth.

Argument: space exploration can allow for satellite placement to warn of weather as well as the actions of countries that intend to cause harm.

Argument: space exploration can lead to new discoveries and might save planet earth in the future

Argument: space exploration can lead to new technologies and innovations therefore we should subsidise it with public funds.

Argument: space exploration can provide valuable scientific information, and should be subsidized to ensure its continuation

Argument: space exploration can tell us so much about the world that we live in and help us to identify potential threats that the human race may need to prepare for.

Argument: space exploration costs too much money that could be spent on better thing such as helping the poor in society.

Argument: space exploration could lead to the ability to harvest much needed mineral resources that could become depleted on our planet.

Argument: space exploration could serve as an insurance policy should something devastating happen to our planet.

Argument: space exploration does not benefit humanity and therefore we should not subsidize it