Topic: We should subsidize journalism

Argument: Non-trustworthy news sources and fake news stories abound. We must subsidize investigative journalism in order to ensure we have reliable news sources that report real facts.

Argument: one problem i find with subsidizing it is that when they go after the people in power they could cut their funding so they would be gun shy about reporting that.

Argument: people don't want to pay for freedom of the press

Argument: presentation of information is important and needs help to keep it viable and reliable.

Argument: quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that.

Argument: quality of journalists may go down if there are more around.

Argument: reputable journalists should get the funds they need to get their stories quickly and accurately.

Argument: State subsidies for jouranalism aren't supported by a majority of the populace, making it undemocratic and not something the state should do.

Argument: State subsidies for journalism will make journals financially dependent on the government, which will allow the government to influence what news gets reported and how the reporting is done.

Argument: subsidies can help to encourage people to become journalists.

Argument: subsidies can make journalists biased towards the companies subsidising them

Argument: subsidies could make for worse quality journalism because more people are trying to get a cut of the money.

Argument: subsidising journalism will put more resources into good investagative journalism.

Argument: subsidising journalism would enable more people to broadcast their viewpoint and include more opinions in mainstream journalism.

Argument: Subsidization will allow journals to act on stories that are most important instead of just those that will get them the most money, which means you will get more airing of important but less catchy stories.

Argument: subsidize journalism means getting people writing what they think will get them more money, so we should avoid this practice.

Argument: Subsidized journalism could cause the journalists to become biased towards whoever is subsidizing them.

Argument: subsidized journalism ensures that the news is factual and from a reliable source so i agree with it.

Argument: subsidized journalism takes the right away from the people to speak their mind and we have the right of free speech.

Argument: subsidizing everything a person does can drain the pocket overtime.

Argument: subsidizing journalism allows more voices to be heard

Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows news organizations to avoid manipulation by companies through advertising spending.

Argument: subsidizing journalism allows the news outlets to be of a higher quality and keep people more informed about the world around them

Argument: subsidizing journalism can lead to biased reporting as news outlets will be influenced by those who subsidize them

Argument: subsidizing journalism causes a glut of useless items that distract from the most important stories affecting our nation.