Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: private military companies simply breed a culture of violence. profiting off of war is not something that should be allowed.

Argument: private military companies specialize in services to help our military.

Argument: private military companies support the military in their job and free up more military personnel to do the job of the military.

Argument: private military companies take on missions when our military doesn't have enough manpower.

Argument: Private military companies take strain off of state military forces in active warzones.

Argument: private military companies take the pressure away from the regular military leaving them less thin on the ground.

Argument: private military companies take the pressure off government armies.

Argument: private military companies tend to save the company hiring them money.

Argument: private military companies when unchecked can become a problem to real militaries.

Argument: private military companies' primary goal is profit. they are not motivated by the desire to serve their nation. they are very difficult to regulate and to hold responsible for their actions.

Argument: private military's will cost a lot of money and be accountable to no one

Argument: private miltary companies are open to abusing their privileges because they are not under the same direct scrutiny as the regular military.

Argument: putting the creation of weapons in the hands of private companies is so dangerous that the time will come when prohibiting these companies will be a necessity

Argument: some private companies are irresponsible and inadequate and should be banned

Argument: sometimes you have to rely on the private sector when the public isn't there to help

Argument: the defense of a country can only be trusted with the government, and should not be motivated by money and greed.

Argument: the do not abide by the same rules and regulations of a government run military and need to be banned.

Argument: the fact that private military companies exist simply breeds the thoughts of violence and escalates the chances of conflict. we should not allow these companies to exist.

Argument: the government should not hold the monopoly on the military and private military companies should not be banned, as it is a free world enterprise.

Argument: the military is the last thing that should be profit driven, reliance on such companies can invoke catastrophe.

Argument: the military should keep all their intelligence in house so i think private military companies should be banned.

Argument: the neutrality of private military companies cannot be guaranteed so they are a threat to national security.

Argument: the operating personnel of these companies has been working for the army of the nation. this type of company keeps them active and always ready to defend if necessary.

Argument: the pay is good and they use new technolodgy

Argument: the private military companies are owned by elites who bet on wars to obtain millions in profits

Argument: there are fewer american casualties when using private military companies.