Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: nothing good comes from nuclear weapons. humans need to get along and work together for a better world instead of finding new ways to destroy the enemy.

Argument: nuclear deterrent stops one country from attacking another for fear that the other country could retaliate with nuclear weapons so, by removing that deterrent, the risk becomes greater

Argument: Nuclear explosions are incredibly bad for the environment: killing all organisms and causing a drop in global temperature and rainfall. The changes are so harmful to the earth and humans that we must abolish nuclear weapons.

Argument: nuclear war will destroy the entire planet.

Argument: Nuclear weapon development takes incredibly intelligent scientists and makes them work on something that is destructive to society, we'd rather they used their intellect to develop helpful technologies which can only happen if we abolish nukes.

Argument: nuclear weapons act as a deterrent, getting rid of them could mean rebel countries using theirs with no threat of retaliation

Argument: nuclear weapons actually promote peace as the threat of their use discourages strife.

Argument: nuclear weapons aid in deterring other countries from attacks and also symbolizes a countries world power.

Argument: Nuclear weapons also provide a safety net for countries in case of an attack and should not be banned.

Argument: nuclear weapons are a deterent to mutual destruction

Argument: Nuclear Weapons are a good defense and allows a nation to protect themselves

Argument: nuclear weapons are a huge deterent to our enemies

Argument: nuclear weapons are a necessary evil that have kept the peace in uncertain times

Argument: nuclear weapons are a necessary latent defence mechanism, holding that potential prevents actual conflict because the unspoken threat protects us

Argument: nuclear weapons are a safety net that we should use

Argument: nuclear weapons are a strong argument to stop any possible foreign aggression

Argument: nuclear weapons are a strong defense for countries against the possible aggression of others. it doesn't have to be used, but the threat of it keeps others is line. ,

Argument: nuclear weapons are a symbol of power and strength that can prevent other countries from attacks, giving us a place as a world power.

Argument: nuclear weapons are an effective threat that have prevented world war for 70 years

Argument: nuclear weapons are an exhorbitantly costly defence strategy that will never be used, just a deterrant at a huge price.

Argument: nuclear weapons are being developed by governments that cannot be assured of judicial usage, leaving the planet vulnerable to destruction

Argument: nuclear weapons are currently the most destructive weapons available today. they kill or maim not only the combatants but innocent people and children.

Argument: nuclear weapons are dangerous and unnecessary

Argument: nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of dictators, who could use them to cause mass destruction.

Argument: nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of evil dictators.