Topic: Entrapment should be legalized

Argument: entrapment is a manipulative practice, those prosecuted through it may never have committed criminal activities without the manipulation of entrapment

Argument: entrapment is a tool that, when used fairly, only catches individuals in the act doing what they would do regardless of the involvement of the police

Argument: entrapment is a useful tool for law enforcement to find people who may otherwise fly under their radar.

Argument: entrapment is a valid exercise in the prevention of possible future crimes.

Argument: entrapment is a valid tactic to remove criminal offenders from the streets

Argument: entrapment is an easy way to prove that someone has committed crimes in the past, by baiting them into committing another one.

Argument: entrapment is an unjust form of capturing criminals as it is tempting someone to do something wrong

Argument: entrapment is illegal under the constitution

Argument: entrapment is immoral as a way of decieving one for punishment

Argument: entrapment is morally wrong and is against human rights and should not be legalized.

Argument: entrapment is simply giving criminals an opportunity to commit a crime, in a way that allows law enforcement to easily catch them.

Argument: entrapment is sometimes the only means possible to capture a diehard criminal.

Argument: entrapment is sometimes the only way to catch sly criminals

Argument: entrapment is unfair and manipulative, they may not ever have committed a crime had they not been manipulated into it

Argument: entrapment is unfair and often has the wrong results.

Argument: entrapment is unfair and often tempts people into committing crimes they normally would not have

Argument: entrapment is unfair and uses low and unfair tactics to trick people into committing crimes.

Argument: entrapment is wrong and inducing person to do the crime from state agents is just wrong.

Argument: entrapment just encourages criminal activity that may not have otherwise have occurred

Argument: entrapment leads to police abuse or to extort citizens

Argument: entrapment makes it easier to catch criminals

Argument: entrapment may lead to people committing crimes that they would otherwise not have committed.

Argument: entrapment might be what gets someone to commit a crime who hasn't decided to do it

Argument: entrapment should be considered as legal as giving huge benefit for safe and secure society.

Argument: entrapment should be illegal because they are convincing someone to commit a crime that they may not have committed without being cohersed into it.

Argument: entrapment should be legal because it is a good way to ensure that a criminal is caught and prosecuted.

Argument: entrapment should be legalized as enables the police to capture criminals

Argument: entrapment should be legalized as it gives a clear insight into how a person would respond in certain situations and their attitude towards breaking the law.

Argument: entrapment should be legalized as it is a useful tool to catch criminals when other strategies have failed.