Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: intellectual property rights allow a person to reap the rewards for having come up with and develop an innovative idea.

Argument: intellectual property rights allow for competition between companies which often leads to positive results for consumers

Argument: intellectual property rights allows a company to protect their brand name, inventions, designs etc, without these rights other companies would be able to steal another companies products

Argument: intellectual property rights allows their creators to receive incentives for their work.

Argument: intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technology

Argument: intellectual property rights are absurd, we deserve to express what we think it does not matter if another already thinks so

Argument: intellectual property rights are difficult to identify and regulate

Argument: Intellectual property rights are ephemeral and hard to define. How do you protect an idea once it has been voiced, They are useless and should be banned.

Argument: intellectual property rights are essential to protect ideas, and protect the investments of those who fund these enterprises - without such assurances, many concept would never leave the drawing board.

Argument: intellectual property rights are expensive to maintain and hold back the spread of new ideas

Argument: intellectual property rights are important as it gives economic incentive for their creation and helps to stimulate innovation and contribute to the technological progress of countries.

Argument: intellectual property rights are important to companies in keeping their value in their people and inventions.

Argument: intellectual property rights are necessary to protect those who came up with better solutions and products, they are meant to give the clever more money to deal with new ideas

Argument: Intellectual property rights are old fashioned because now many people can come up with an idea and not get it patented but still be successful

Argument: intellectual property rights are ridiculous and do not foster ideological growth

Argument: intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.

Argument: Intellectual property rights are too hard to keep track of and monitor

Argument: intellectual property rights are too hard to maintain. we should do away with them and just let life happen.

Argument: intellectual property rights are too vague,they include copyrighting words, gestures, etc and should be sbolish

Argument: intellectual property rights are unhelpful to companies who want to copy other people's ideas

Argument: intellectual property rights are useful as it helps protect people who have innovative products.

Argument: intellectual property rights are what protects an individual who earns his living from that work