Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: academic education has been promoted at the expense of vocational education and this needs to be re-balanced by subsidizing vocational education.

Argument: all education including vocational education should be subsidized. it all leads to the bettering of society overall.

Argument: all education should be subsidized because education creates better people and a better world.

Argument: all people need to have life skills such as cooking, fixing items, and building. by giving classes in these vocational areas we are helping all of society. life is not just book smarts.

Argument: any subsidy for education after school is unnecessary, the right to access education ends at 16 at which point people can fund their own adult decisions

Argument: anyone with an aptitude for a necessary service profession should be encouraged to pursue it

Argument: because the individuals repay society fully within a very short space of time by the work that they do, which is generally not competitively paid.

Argument: by subsidising training it may lead to more employers taking on trainees.

Argument: enables people to learn on the go and use the skills in practice.

Argument: ensuring participation in vocational education is important in making sure we have a enough people skilled in trades.

Argument: everyone should get a free university education rather than a vocational degree

Argument: four year colleges are not for everyone. vocational education is less expensive and is needed in many industries.

Argument: grants already exist for those who cannot afford traditional and vocational education. subsidizing vocational education would make little difference except wasting money that could go to more immediate needs.

Argument: higher education, such as vocational education, should be paid for only by those partaking in it. otherwise there would be a lot of wasted funds with drop out rates.

Argument: i think we should because it would help get more people into jobs that pay better.

Argument: if everyone could have some vocational education then they'd be more ready for the world of work when they get there.

Argument: if one decides to pursue a vocational education, they should find a way to attain it for themselves without the aide taxpayers' money.

Argument: if subsidies were put into place for vocational education then other areas of education would also want subsidies and this would cost the government far too much to implement.

Argument: if vocational education was subsidised everyone would be able to partake in it and therefore have more knowledge of the tea they're going to work in, which would create a more dedicated workforce overall.

Argument: if we subsidize vocational education it would be unfair to those who wish to enter other fields.

Argument: If you subsidize vocational education then the schools will raise tuition as they have done at liberal arts colleges.

Argument: in a changing world, vocational education is more likely to lead to employment and so it should be subsidised.