Topic: We should end mandatory retirement

Argument: a mandatory retirement age allows employers to be able to bring fresh talent into their workforce

Argument: a mandatory retirement age helps employers regularly refresh the workforce with fresh talent

Argument: A worker should not be forced to retire if he feels he can still adequately produce for his employer.

Argument: after a certain age, people physical reflexes and mental acuity are more likely to decline

Argument: Allowing workers to choose when they retire can improve staff retention, increase workforce morale, and help employers retain vital skills and experience

Argument: although elderly people may want to continue working to make more money it could be dangerous for their bodies to continue at a fast paced work environment. we have to look out for their safety.

Argument: as life expectancy and healthy ageing continue to grow mandatory retirement no longer makes sense.

Argument: as long as someone is capable of doing his job it should be his choice when to retire and not the decision of some bureaucrat.

Argument: As people age they automatically become less cognitively and physically responsive. Mandatory retirement makes sure that professions are filled with people who are at their peak of cognitive and physical performance.

Argument: As people continue to have children later and later, mandatory retirement prevents people from being able to provide for their family and dependents.

Argument: as people live longer and have variable health the concept that all need to retire at a set age is archaic and so we should end mandatory retirement.

Argument: as quality of life improves and the average lifespan increases, mandatory retirement looks more and more out of step with the modern human life experience.

Argument: by forcing someone to retire it then means that spot is open for a younger person to fill the role, someone who could really use the money

Argument: By freeing up space across professional hierarchies mandatory retirement provides more opportunities for career growth and upward mobility for younger people.

Argument: by having mandatory retirement we are opening job positions for the younger people who need to being their workforce life. they bring new ideas to the workforce that will benefit society.

Argument: by pushing an older group of people out of a particular profession, this makes room for a younger generation to enter the workforce

Argument: certain professions, such as police officer and air traffic controller, have mandatory retirement ages to ensure that the person who is responsible for the safety of others remains competent to do his job

Argument: citizens should have the right to choose when to withdraw

Argument: companies with a mandatory retirement policy might avoid becoming stale and outdated by constantly infusing their workforces with fresh talent

Argument: compulsory retirement is necessary and fair because it gives workers the opportunity to enjoy their old age without completing a workday. non-execution of mandatory retirement should not end