Topic: We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms

Argument: Gun violence is a huge problem and there are too many mass shootings. If people didn't have guns many lives would be saved. Less suicides would happen too as guns are just too easy to use.

Argument: gun violence is at a an all time high and getting arms off the streets should be our number one priority.

Argument: gun violence is constantly on the rise with many innocent people loosing their lives every day.

Argument: gun violence is getting out of control and the only way to deal with this horrific problem is to get all guns off the streets.

Argument: gun violence is out of control and guns are getting into the wrong hands

Argument: gun violence takes innocent peoples lives every day.

Argument: guns are a constitutional right and should not be taken away

Argument: guns are already ubiquitous and outlawing them will only keep them out of the hands of lawful owners.

Argument: Guns are designed to kill people, we should be doing everything possible to destroy them and stop their production to save lives, allowing people to keep and bear arms does the absolute opposite of this.

Argument: guns are much too dangerous and often get in the wrong hands

Argument: guns are not allowed in most european countries and crime is lower there.

Argument: guns often end up in the wrong hands causing murders.

Argument: i think that carrying weapons is a method of self-defense, but you have to be very careful with that, and those who handle them

Argument: i think the we shouldn't abolish the right to keep and bear arms for the wolrd peace

Argument: if arms are used for personal protection only they can save somebody's life in case of personal attack

Argument: if no one had weapons the world would be safer on the whole, so they should be abolished.

Argument: if no one was able to bear arms, no one could get shot

Argument: if no one was allowed to bear arms there would be less access to them and this would go on to lessen the amount of shooting incidents.

Argument: if not guns, there will be other weapons like knives to harm people instead

Argument: if the right to keep and bear arms were abolished would be taking away another fundamental right of americans and this cannot happen.

Argument: if we abolished the right to bear arms then there would be fewer violent incidents that kill innocent civilians for example, the manchester shootings.

Argument: in a dangerous society, surely a person has the right to protect themselves and their family - this was the initial reasoning behind enshrining 'the right to keep and bear arms', and nothing has changed.

Argument: In the Constitution, we have the right to keep and bear arms and we can't have that taken away,.

Argument: in the face of insecurity, many people resort to buying a firearm for personal defense, however, certain parameters and conditions must be met.

Argument: Individuals who live in remote areas need to be able to protect themselves

Argument: innocent people are often maimed and killed by weapons in the wrong hands innocent lives would be saved if they were banned