Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons as they can cause catastrophic consequences and can cause unspeakable suffering.

Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because even one nuclear strike could lead to mutually assured destruction.

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because if someone sets them off it would be the end of the world as we know it

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because is fundamental for world peace

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because the use of nuclear weapons can destroy an entire city or country.

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they have destroyed countries and left people for dead and without homes

Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they pose an existential threat to civilization.

Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they turn short term political problems into permanent environmental problems.

Argument: we should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons for the peace and envelope of people

Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons to ensure a safe future for our children and the world.

Argument: we should fight for the absolution of nuclear weapons so that the world can have the best chance of everlasting peace. there would be no threat of these weapons destroying the world.

Argument: we should fight to abolition nuclear weapons because if they get in the wrong hands many people will be killed

Argument: we should get rid of it because there are to many risks involved

Argument: We should not abolish nuclear weapons as it will only encourage countries to develop other weaponry in order to have either a deterrent or a force against other countries.

Argument: we should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because countries have them to protect themselves against other countries

Argument: we should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because if our country was ever attacked with nuclear weapons, we need to be able to fight back.

Argument: We should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because there is no safe way to dispose of the warheads that they use, and at least now they are well maintained and monitored.

Argument: we should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons since just having nuclear weapons deters another nation from starting a major conflict with us.

Argument: we should not live in a world where there is a threat of a nuclear weapon being used and therefore we should fight to ban them.

Argument: we shouldn't fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because it lead to more power for the country and lowers the chance of a nuclear war

Argument: we shouldn't fight to get rid of nuclear weapons. they provide a deterrent to serious conflict because even the smaller countries who have nuclear weapons pose a threat