Topic: We should subsidize vocational education

Argument: We should subsidize not vocational education because employers should be training their own employees, not the public.

Argument: We should subsidize not vocational education because it is unfair to make taxpayers subsidize some people's education.

Argument: We should subsidize not vocational education because it trades off with more urgent needs the state can meet, like homeless shelters and food banks.

Argument: We should subsidize not vocational education because it will discourage students from going into traditional higher education, and therefore limit their career options.

Argument: we should subsidize our vocational education so that the workforce is stronger, more educated in their specific field, and more jobs are filled which boosts the economy

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education as it is an area that needs enhancements to encourage students to follow in those trades.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education as we need more worker bees than office bees.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because educated individuals eventually give back to their communities by becoming things like doctors or politicians.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because everyone relies on skilled tradespeople.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because in today's world a skill is very valuable and providing funding to students would be beneficial to mankind.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because it helps people gain knowledge for things they are passionate about

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because it is often inaccessible to low income students.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because it will lead to a lower unemployment rate.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because it would give more people a chance to go to college that can't afford it

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because it would improve student life outcomes and improve the economy by filling more jobs

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because knowledge is important. we need more skilled tradesmen and workers to keep our economy afloat.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because not all people are college material. there is a shortage of people working in certain fields that do not require a college education.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because the workforce in the trades is rapidly aging and needs to be replaced with young workers.

Argument: we should subsidize vocational education because there is a real need for certain trades.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because there is a shortage of tradesmen and women.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education because these skills are essential to the economy.

Argument: We should subsidize vocational education so that we do not privilege liberal arts over other types of education that are equally important.