Topic: We should ban human cloning

Argument: human cloning helps to eradicate diseases and should not be banned

Argument: Human cloning is a bad science. this science will endanger the world since the cloned humans will have no parents, no rights and will behave in free-will.

Argument: human cloning is a dangerous precedent that may eventually replace natural reproduction and lead to the downfall of society

Argument: human cloning is a good thing for science

Argument: human cloning is a huge ethical grey zone. we have no idea how this technology might affect someone's life, and the questionable moral involved shouldn't be messed with.

Argument: human cloning is a matter of choice if there isn't another possibility for reproduction

Argument: human cloning is a minefield for ethics and will result in a sort of eugenics program with 'designer babies'

Argument: human cloning is akin to playing god and needs to be banned. there are too many potential down-sides to it.

Argument: human cloning is an abomination and immoral, we should not be playing god.

Argument: human cloning is an ethical nightmare - should people be allowed to clone themselves to harvest organs from their child?

Argument: Human cloning is an experimental and untested area of science where the effects on those cloned is as yet unknown and could be life-threatening in a number of ways

Argument: human cloning is an important step in prolonging life, ending disease and ending suffering.

Argument: human cloning is an unnatural act that goes against the laws of nature. it is too dangerous of an act and is something man should not be tampering with.

Argument: human cloning is completely immoral because it turns people into commodities

Argument: human cloning is immoral and should be banned.

Argument: human cloning is just a medical advance more, it does not mean that we are going to create cloned human armies, that is an exaggeration

Argument: human cloning is literally 'playing god', opens a huge ethical minefield, and genetic engineering in a wider sense could even be a back door to more troubling avenues of ethnic cleansing.

Argument: human cloning is messing with nature and also with some religion too and should be banned ad hock.

Argument: human cloning is not what nature intended for reproduction

Argument: human cloning is nothing more than playing god.

Argument: human cloning is sick and morally wrong.

Argument: human cloning is still somewhat new, making it dangerous for humans and should be banned

Argument: human cloning is the creation of a human being from your own characteristics and genes just like you that is confused before the eyes of others

Argument: human cloning is the future of medicine. cloned bodies and parts will save thousands of lives.

Argument: human cloning is too risky and unethical. it's also unnecessary with the current science and technological advances. we can accomplish the same things that cloning can with 3d printing and other technologies.

Argument: human cloning is unethical and not how we were created

Argument: human cloning is unethical we are tampering with nature