Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons

Argument: a country should have the right to defend itself in whatever way it sees fit even if they do not intend to use nuclear weapons.

Argument: A terrorist group with a nuclear weapon could cause immense and immediate damage and devastation.

Argument: abolishing nuclear weapons is a good action to take. nuclear weapons are dangerous and could expose the planets to extreme destruction

Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal. The technology exists and it will be used.

Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is the only way to ensure that those weapons never fall in the hands of nefarious actors, such as terrorist organizations.

Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons would be a first step toward world peace.

Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons would benefit all of humanity.

Argument: all nuclear weapons should be abolished. the bombs strike at innocent people not just soldiers. the bombs can knock out cities. true devastation are the results of them.

Argument: allowing nations to have nuclear weapons contributes to peace as nobody wants to start a war that will result in mutual destruction.

Argument: Any use of nuclear weapons in war would result in mutually assured destruction and likely the devastation of the entire planet, and any amount of conventional warfare is preferable to that outcome.

Argument: any weapon that can destroy the world should be eliminated

Argument: Arms races which result from the presence of nuclear weapons increase danger as states are more likely to entrust nukes to less experienced military personnel and have more difficulty tracking them.

Argument: as it is becoming increasingly obvious that they are too dangerous to keep. they cause devastating destruction and in the wrong hands could cause the end of the world.

Argument: As long as nuclear weapons exist people will confuse missile-like objects in the sky for nukes, which causes massive public terrors that are very bad for states and individual people.

Argument: as long as nuclear weapons exist, the entire world has to worry about nations deciding to fire them at another or terrorists getting hold of them and causing disaster

Argument: by doing away with nuclear weapons, we can make the world safer from war and accidental explosions.

Argument: by having nuclear weapons the world has managed to avoid a major war. they act as an insurance policy.

Argument: countries that abolish nuclear weapons will leave themselves defenseless to the countries that refuse to.

Argument: countries with nuclear weapons are better able to defend themselves than countries without.

Argument: Destroying nuclear bombs would work to a nations disadvantage because they will be vulnerable to attacks

Argument: Disarming all states will make them susceptible when one corrupt state or non-state actor doesn't follow the rules. When everyone has nuclear weapons, there is more of a check on individual dangerous actors.