Topic: We should ban human cloning

Argument: human cloning is unethical. what would happen to the clones once they were created? harvest their organs and then what? euthanize them like garbage?

Argument: human cloning is unexplored territory and can have huge detrimental repercussions we are currently unaware of

Argument: human cloning is unnatural and could cause the demise of human beings

Argument: human cloning is unnatural, we are not god and should not try being one.

Argument: human cloning is unnecessary and the technology can be misused if it gets into the wrong hands.

Argument: human cloning is unnecessary, unethical and serves no purpose apart increasing overpopulation of the planet

Argument: human cloning is very open to abuse and could be used for the wrong things

Argument: human cloning is vital for medical science as it might be able to identify treatments and cures for diseases

Argument: Human cloning makes it possible to make specific human body parts that a person's body would be less likely to reject.

Argument: human cloning may have serious consequences such as cloning unhealthy cells and create humans that live very short

Argument: human cloning may prove to create the ability of humans to remain strong and viable to ensure our survival , and the concept should not be banned.

Argument: human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.

Argument: Human cloning may provide the cure to so many diseases, it must be allowed.

Argument: human cloning may result in mutations and double the population.

Argument: human cloning may solve all types of medical problems.

Argument: Human cloning must be prohibited because it could be used in many things to commit crimes

Argument: human cloning not only can aid in securing the longevity of a familial line but aid in research to target diseases that can find a cure.

Argument: human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.

Argument: human cloning opens up a whole new level of ethics, such as the rights of the clone, that we are unprepared to handle legally and morally.

Argument: human cloning provides a wonderful opportunity to test theories on health and medicine and should be encouraged not banned.

Argument: human cloning puts the ego of a person over the welfare of the baby

Argument: Human cloning reduces people to man made machines

Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it is against God's word and it is unethical in that it is likely to exploit women to obtain the necessary genetic material needed.

Argument: human cloning should be banned as it unnatural and there is no firm basis that displays the benefits that it can bring

Argument: human cloning should be banned as the long term effects on the cloned is still uncertain and could lead to long term health complications

Argument: Human cloning should be banned as there is insufficient research into what might happen in the future with mutations, disease and genetic defaults being replicated.

Argument: human cloning should be banned as this is considered to be immoral to many religious people.