Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights

Argument: ideas and products need to be available at a fair price for everyone, allowing companies to have their intellectual rights means they can charge far too much to people who need that service or product.

Argument: ideas are free thoughts so it's not fair for one person to profit off of it

Argument: ideas can not be owned or regulated, therefore they do not belong to a singular person

Argument: ideas should be everyones not just one persons

Argument: if a company created something, we shouldn't just let everybody else copy them

Argument: if a person has worked hard to create a lyric, a song or a novel then it is only fair that they own their work and benefit financially from it.

Argument: if abolished it will stiffle creativity and advancement because there will be no incentive if intellectual property is not a right.

Argument: if an individual has created any property it is his to determine it's use

Argument: If no-one is able to own the intellectual property rights to their own work it will severely put them off producing it in the first place with severe consequences.

Argument: if someone comes up with a cool idea or invention it's not fair for someone else to be able to steal it

Argument: if someone comes up with something on their own, no on else should have the right to try to profit or capitalize off of it. intellectual rights need to be protected.

Argument: if someone holds the intellectual property for a specific abstract idea, they can prevent further development of that idea, which is not good for society.

Argument: if someone invents something they should be able to profit from it

Argument: if we abolish intellectual property rights people will just stop trying to invent new ides because they won't get anything for their efforts.

Argument: if we abolish intellectual property rights there is the fear of ideas being stolen.

Argument: if we abolish the rights, then companies will stop developing products and ideas as they will know that there is no way they can make back the cost of r&d and so will run at losses

Argument: if we abolish these rights we remove incentive for innovation. people would have no guaranteed gains for creating intellectual property

Argument: If you think of something first you don't want another person stealing that idea and profiting out of it.

Argument: information should be freely available to all

Argument: intellectual endeavors are not isolated and it's possible for more than one individual to have the same ideas and inspiration

Argument: intellectual properties allow large corporations to have monopolies over their products and restrict the free market.

Argument: intellectual property is just as valid as a property that is concrete. its creator deserves to control these rights.

Argument: intellectual property is no different than physical property, thus the rights of the owner must be protected.

Argument: intellectual property is such a vague concept in many cases, to have a right to it stiffles others' creativity.

Argument: intellectual property is used to smother business, it effectively destroys the free market