Topic: We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms

Argument: abolishing the right to keep and bear arms would put all innocent people at risk because people who want to kill will find a way to do so and innocent people will be defenseless

Argument: Arms are very bad for the whole of society when they are in the hands of bad persons. giving anyone the right to keep and bear arms puts society in danger

Argument: assault rifles, machine guns, and the like were not around when the bill of rights was written. arms of today are only weapons to use against other people.

Argument: avoiding the right to have or carry weapons is important since weapons are dangerous and that everyone has the possibility of having a weapon in their possession. it can be catastrophic for humanity.

Argument: bearing arms runs the risk of random killings by those that have access to guns

Argument: by abolishing the right to keep and bear arms we would reduce the amount of weapons in the hands of people and possible reduce violent crime.

Argument: by abolishing the right to keep and bear arms will only place the weapons in the hands of criminals.

Argument: by abolishing the right to keep and bear arms, we can reduce the amount of weapons in civilian hands and in turn reduce some of the violence.

Argument: by allowing citizens to own guns, the chances of these weapons being stolen by criminals is increased, allowing guns to fall into the wrong hands would be disastrous

Argument: by eliminating the circulation of arms we will reduce violence and prevent crimes

Argument: Citizens should be allowed to defend themselves with lethal force in a life-or-death situation because the police are typically slow to respond to such situations.

Argument: citizens should have the right to protect themselves anyway they see fit

Argument: current gun laws are outdated and do not serve the public. countries with stricter gun laws that lack the right to keep and bear arms see fewer homicides and suicides.

Argument: even if abolished guns will still exist. you'd never be able to find every gun and confiscate them. now the only people with guns would be criminals who have untraceable weapons.

Argument: Everyone must have the right to defend themselves, their families and their property, more and more criminals are carrying guns and if homeowners do not have them they are defenceless

Argument: everyone should have the right to keep and bear arms for protection

Argument: firearms can serve a purpose in rural communities which suffer from pests such as wild bore.

Argument: firearms in the hands of civilians create societies more prone to violence

Argument: given the staggering increase in gun deaths, especially school shootings, many done with legal weapons, the constitution should be rewritten to address current firearms and times

Argument: gun crime is the biggest killer in the us, this can be greatly reduced by abolishing the right to bear arms

Argument: gun ownership has led to many mass shootings lately