Topic: Foster care brings more harm than good

Argument: foster car brings more good than harm because it gives children a good home to live in when the need arises.

Argument: foster car gives the child the experience of a loving, supportive home life, and is better than a life in state care facilities.

Argument: foster care allows children to form a strong bond with individual parent figures, rather than constantly being shuffled between numerous adoption agency employees.

Argument: foster care brings love and warmth to children who really need it and to give them a chance to have a normal family

Argument: foster care brings more harm than good because many foster parents are in it for the money instead of actually caring for the children

Argument: foster care can be horrible for the child when moving from home to home and never settling down in one place.

Argument: foster care can be very difficult for the child moving from him to home.

Argument: foster care can be very temporary in duration, and uprooting a child can cause emotional damage and unnecessary dislocation.

Argument: foster care can bring hope to children that are left with no family to love and support them.

Argument: foster care can help provide a young person a stable environment so they can grow & flourish in a normal home setting

Argument: foster care can leave kids with behavioral problems

Argument: foster care children may have many adverse outcomes that persist throughout childhood, such as poor peer relationships, behavioral problems, or other mental health difficulties

Argument: foster care creates an environment where the child cannot form a meaningful relationship because of the ever changing situations.

Argument: foster care gives a child a safe environment to grow in versus their original situation. it gives them a chance at life.

Argument: foster care gives kids who would otherwise not have any parental figures in their lives have a chance at a somewhat normal life.

Argument: foster care gives vulnerable kids a second chance at a stable home life.

Argument: foster care has mostly bought medical problems to the children and lead to many deaths.

Argument: foster care helps many children that have abusive parents and make them live in a better environment.

Argument: foster care helps remove children from a dangerous environment and puts then in a safe place.

Argument: foster care homes typically have a massive number of children, making meaningful, individual care impossible.

Argument: foster care is important because it keeps kids from living in large group care facilities where there is no semblance of a normal life.

Argument: foster care is rarely a good place for children.  they're shuffled from home to home with little to no real connection or possessions.

Argument: foster care is run by people trying to make a profit rather than protect children.

Argument: foster care is the only chance some children have for a safe and stable home environment.

Argument: foster care is valuable in protecting vulnerable children from harm