Topic: We should ban private military companies

Argument: We should not ban private military companies since these private companies can do things their own way and are not controlled by the government. They can fill in spots the government doesn't address.

Argument: we should not ban private military companies. they provide invaluable resource to defend our freedom and our country.

Argument: we should not ban private military, it is a far better alternative than forced national conscription

Argument: we should not because if we went to war its always handy to have another army behind you.

Argument: we shouldn't ban private military because if there was a war then we need all the extra power that there is.

Argument: we shouldn't ban private military companies because it will leave people without a job

Argument: we shouldn't ban private military companies because they can be a neutral provider of weapons and arms for the government

Argument: we would not be able to oversee their operations and prevent them from unethical activities.

Argument: wealthy people and companies may need additional military protection and should be able to use it.

Argument: wealthy people or companies may have a need to have their own type of military to protect themselves and their assets and should therefore be allowed to.

Argument: when there is a shortage of military manpower, private military companies can fill the gaps.

Argument: with the defence budget shrinking, private military companies are good economic way to fill the gap.

Argument: without private military companies the army wouldn't be able to provide enough personnel every day in crisis environments and therefore its essential they remain.

Argument: Without private military companies, the military would be ill equipped and not able to get the tools they need,