Topic: We should ban the use of child actors

Argument: because many child actors end up pscyhologically damaged and neglected, ruining the rest of their lives

Argument: Being a child actor can be a positive experience as long as a child's other needs are also met

Argument: being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start.

Argument: child acting brings a revenue for people at a young age. if you have the gift to entertain then why not?

Argument: child actors are able to access school work on set, and have a protected upbringing. there is no need to ban the use of children in tv and films as there is no harm caused.

Argument: child actors are all too often traumatised or abused so their use should be banned.

Argument: child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.

Argument: child actors are at risk for abuse mentally and sexually which will destroy their development in life

Argument: child actors are carefully monitored and protected by current laws and should not be banned.

Argument: child actors are exploited both by parents and the video industry, children should study and grow without working

Argument: child actors are exploited by adults and should be banned

Argument: child actors are exposed to far too many adult situations and are exposed to many harmful conducts in the acting world, therefore child actors should be banned.

Argument: child actors are exposed to too much of an adult world and are at a greater risk of being exposed to drugs and drink. many former child actors have ended up as addicts because of this.

Argument: Child actors are fine to use as long as there is a responsible adult watching them.

Argument: child actors are for the most part thrown into a role they do not wish to be in, while their parents pocket the gains.

Argument: Child actors are forced to grow up way too fast, they are thrown into a world of drugs and sex at an early age. Kids should be away from all that until Hollywood is safe for them.

Argument: child actors are important so programs can show people of ages and are reflective of society. child actors are an important part of the industry and are needed to reflect people accurately.

Argument: child actors are necessary and children can learn how to work even from an early age

Argument: child actors are needed for many roles in the television and movie industry.

Argument: child actors are needed for roles that could not be fulfilled by adults so banning their use would be impossible.

Argument: child actors are needed to fulfill certain roles

Argument: child actors are needed to play the roles of children

Argument: child actors are needed to ply childrens roles

Argument: child actors are needed to portray children in movies and shows. we can't ban them.

Argument: child actors are not able to make their own decisions and are placed in situations that they do not understand for the financial benefit of others and should be banned.