Topic: We should adopt libertarianism

Argument: libertarianism leaves the poor and disadvantaged without protection from the rich and powerful

Argument: libertarianism loses government programs that provide safety regulations, social services and other necessary programs that are lost with this type of governing entity, or lack thereof.

Argument: libertarianism loses the control over social service programs and other social service entities, as well as providing regulations to protect the rights and lives of the governments people.

Argument: libertarianism maximizes personal freedom and frees people from the inherent debt and tyranny of big government.

Argument: libertarianism may remove safety standards legislation concerning pollution, food production, vaccination and drugs/medicine that keep millions of people safe.

Argument: libertarianism only divides the people more and should be eliminated as a political party

Argument: libertarianism opens the door to many abuses and rights infringements, that actually achieves the opposite of its goal- it reduces our overall freedom

Argument: libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy.

Argument: libertarianism promotes self interest and does not consider the needs of society as a whole

Argument: libertarianism promotes self interest and not that of society as a whole

Argument: libertarianism promotes the idea of innovation and self improvement

Argument: libertarianism provides an open discussion of choice and thoughts

Argument: Libertarianism provides little to no support for those at the bottom and would not attain equitable outcomes for society.

Argument: libertarianism provides the opportunity to see things from many viewpoints

Argument: libertarianism puts too much focus on the individual and can lead to selfishness and not enough focus on society as a whole.

Argument: Libertarianism reduces problems like police brutality by reducing the power of police in the state.

Argument: libertarianism removes the big brother tyranny of big government and allows more freedom for the people

Argument: libertarianism serves to protect individual liberties

Argument: libertarianism should be adopted as it promotes the freedom of the individualism and people can live as they please.

Argument: libertarianism should be adopted because it lets people do whatever they want as long as they respect other people's rights

Argument: libertarianism should not be adopted as it will give too much power to businesses and rich people to do whatever they want.

Argument: libertarianism should not be adopted as philosophies that center on personal freedom could lead to chaos and the breakdown of society.

Argument: libertarianism should not be adopted because if the rights of the individual outweigh the rights of society then chaos would result, the glue that holds society together would be broken.

Argument: libertarianism shouldn't be adopted because it ends up with people having their views misinterpreted