Topic: Social media platforms should be regulated by the government

Argument: Social media platforms should be regulated by the government, as they would maintain control of publications with a sense of hatred and violence.

Argument: social media should be monitored by the government to prevent abuse

Argument: Social media should be regulated because a lot of fake news circulates there. For example, during the 2016 election, Russia took out ads on Facebook promoting  Trump and spreading falsehoods about Hillary.

Argument: Social media should be regulated because contains tons of material that can be considered harmful

Argument: Social media should be regulated by the government to keep offensive and bullying information off of the sites.

Argument: Social media should be regulated by the government to prevent them from promoting dangerous activities and ideologies.

Argument: Social networks are monitored by the governments of the world to avoid different crimes that can be carried out in them, such as scams

Argument: social networks being monitored by the government, would cause less negative impact on society

Argument: Social networks have become an extremely important means of communication, which results in the government regulating and legislating it, but without depriving freedom of expression.

Argument: Social networks have become an extremely important means of communication, which results in the government regulating and legislating it.

Argument: Social networks have become the first means of communication for this reason the need to regulate and legislate the same government

Argument: Social networks have become the first means of communication, therefore, the need to regulate and legislate the government, but without undermining freedom of expression

Argument: social networks must be free of hate and harassment, regulating them is important

Argument: social networks must be regulated by some entity so that there are no improper things in them

Argument: Social networks must be regulated by some entity so that there are no improper things in them, that is why they must be supervised

Argument: Social networks must be regulated by the government for better control of the information they use

Argument: social networks must be supervised by the governments of each country respecting freedom of expression and avoiding misappropriation of information

Argument: Social networks must be supervised by the governments of each country, respecting freedom of expression and avoiding misappropriations of information, this does not mean that they will be limited.

Argument: social networks should be monitored, mainly because of the interest that the owners may have in their publications and what consequences X types of publications bring to the population.

Argument: social networks should be regulated because they have a lot of content that is not available to our children

Argument: Social platforms are a double-edged sword due to the content that can reach different users, including those that incite hatred, discrimination and social status, which must be restricted to mitigate them