Title: Understanding desistance from sexual offending
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council

Abstract: There is a long tradition of research in criminology which examines why convicted offenders desist from further offending. However, to date research into desistance from crime has focused almost exclusively on the general antisocial offender and there has been little published research into desistance specifically from sexual offending. This proposal addresses this specific gap in the literature - it sets out to use some of the techniques that have been used to examine desistance amongst offenders in general within the specific problem field of desistance from sexual offending. The research design will involve interviewing and comparing the life stories of a sample of 'recidivist' sex offenders and a sample of 'desisting' individuals. The recidivist sub-sample will be used for comparison purposes and will consist of 10-15 individuals under probation supervision. This group will be determined by the presence of more than one conviction for a sexual offence against a child and will be further refined by including only those offenders where the most recent sexual offence is within 12 months from the date of the research. This is because other research (e.g. Healy 2010) shows desistance from crime to be an iterative process that develops over time. By interviewing persistent sex offenders relatively close to the date of their most recent offence we will be able to better understand their experience of 'persistence'. These individuals will be approached through their probation officer. The 'desisting' sub sample will consist of 25-30 individuals who were convicted of committing a sexual offence against a child a minimum of 3 years previously and have been living crime free in the community under licence for at least 2 years, but who are still under the supervision of the probation service. This group will be identified from probation records and in consultation with the individuals' probation officers who will have monitored them closely for several years in the community. Sub-samples will be matched on a case-by-case basis as closely as possible on key variables known to be related to recidivism (e.g., age, conviction type, numbers of previous convictions). The active group will be selected from those offenders currently attending sex offender treatment in one or more of the probation trusts covered by the Regional Sex Offender Unit (RSOU). The RSOU is run by Mark Farmer and provides sex offender treatment for five of the probation trusts in the Midlands of England. This gives a potential sample group of over 400 individuals. The data collection method will be semi-structured intensive interviews with the two groups. A broadly phenomenological approach will be adopted to identify the way participants understand their lives and particularly how they have experienced life events that have led to offending, and its persistence or otherwise. The formulation of theory will follow a grounded theory methodology. This is a novel approach with sexual offenders because although qualitative research has been used widely with non-sexual offenders (see above) there is little research using this methodology with sexual offenders. This methodology has been chosen because there is a general lack of qualitative research with sex offenders, and what research there is has uncovered a rich source of data that has so far eluded more quantitative methods. The results will be used to inform sex offender assessment and treatment approaches in probation and prisons, as well as to advance the knowledge in the academic field.


Research activity codes: 2.3 PSYCHOLOGICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS
Health categories: MENTAL HEALTH