Characterization of oral pain in cats after dental extractions in a multidisciplinary approach

Oral disease is one of the most commonly reported diseases in veterinary medicine, and tooth extractions are commonly required as the treatment. The procedure, however, is invasive, and long-term pain management is necessary. In veterinary medicine, opioids, local anesthetic blocks and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are administered as perioperative analgesic intervention. Behavioral signs of oral disease-induced pain have not been systematically investigated in cats, and the current knowledge is mostly based on anecdotal evidence or studies performed in other species. It is not known how oral disease and the treatment (i.e. tooth extractions) can affect perioperative food intake, pain scores, additional analgesic requirements and behaviors in cats. Also, it is not known if a facial expression-based pain scale (Feline Grimace Scale: FGS) could be used for oral pain assessment as well. The objectives of this PhD program were: 1) to identify the specific behaviors associated with oral disease by using video assessment, and to verify their correlation with the real-time pain scores, 2) to assess the impact of oral disease and pain on food intake and feeding-related behaviors, 3) to determine the effects of oral disease treatment on behavior, pain scores and food intake, 4) to assess the inter-rater reliability of the FGS in cats undergoing dental extractions and 5) to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse events of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine hydrochloride formulation (Simbadol, 1.8 mg/mL) in comparison with a standard buprenorphine hydrochloride formulation (Vetergesic, 0.3 mg/mL) as part of a multimodal regimen in cats undergoing dental extractions. The hypotheses were: 1) specific behaviors associated with oral disease would be identified and correlated with real-time pain scores, 2) cats with severe oral disease would have lower food intake and higher pain scores, and require rescue analgesia when compared with cats with no/minimal oral disease, 3) treatment of oral disease would reduce the prevalence of specific behaviors and pain scores and improve food consumption of these animals, 4) the FGS scores scored by different raters would be reliable in cats undergoing dental extractions and 5) both Simbadol and Vetergesic would produce similar postoperative pain scores, adverse events and timing and prevalence of rescue analgesia when using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale-Feline (CMPS-F). The project was divided into two studies and four articles (study 1: articles 1-3, study 2: article 4): 1) investigation of pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements and the amount of food intake in cats undergoing oral treatment, 2) investigation of the pain-induced specific behaviors related to oral pain in cats undergoing oral treatment, 3) investigation of inter-rater reliability of FGS in cats undergoing oral treatment, and 4)  comparison of the analgesic efficacy of two dosage regimens using two different concentrations of buprenorphine in cats undergoing dental extractions. In article 1, twenty-four cats were equally divided into minimal (minimal dental treatment) or severe (multiple dental extractions) oral disease groups based on a dental scoring system which involved the number and location of teeth extraction and hospitalized for 7 days (admission on day 0, oral examination, radiographs and treatment under general anesthesia on day 1 and discharge on day 6). During hospitalization, pain scores based on CMPS-F, the prevalence of rescue analgesia (CMPS-F ≥ 5/20), dry and soft food intake (%) during periods of 3 minutes and 2 hours, daily soft food intake and serum inflammatory cytokines were analyzed and compared. In article 2, cats were filmed remotely for 10 min throughout the study at different time points (total of 36h of video recording). The videos consisted of four parts namely general, playing, feeding and post-feeding behaviors. The duration and frequency of different behaviors based on an ethogram were analyzed. In article 3, ninety-one image captures (i.e. screenshots) from videos filmed at days 1 (postoperative 6 hours) and 6 for article 2 and videos filmed before/after rescue analgesia were included. The FGS comprises five action units (AU): eyes, ears, muzzle, whiskers and head position. The FGS scores of the images were independently scored by four blinded raters. Inter-rater reliability of each AU and total FGS scores and the effect of the caregiver’s presence were evaluated. In study 2 (article 4), twenty-three cats undergoing tooth extractions were included. Cats randomly received either Simbadol (1.8 mg/mL; 0.24 mg/kg SC, every 24h, n = 11) or Vetergesic (0.3 mg/mL; 0.02 mg/kg IM, every 8h, n = 12) throughout the study. They were admitted on day 0, underwent oral examination, radiographs and treatment under general anesthesia on day 1 and discharged on day 4. Sedation and pain were scored using the dynamic interactive visual analog scale (day 1) and CMPS-F¬, respectively. Sedation and pain scores and the prevalence of rescue analgesia (CMPS-F ≥ 5/20) and resentment (defined as any type of escape behavior associated with aversion to drug administration) were analyzed. The studies found that the pain scores and the prevalence of rescue analgesia were significantly increased, and dry and soft food intakes were significantly decreased in cats with severe disease when compared with those with minimal disease, and the oral disease influences inflammatory cytokines and induces the specific behaviors. FGS is a reliable tool for the assessment of oral pain and is not affected by the caregiver’s presence. Pain scores and the prevalence of rescue analgesia in cats administered Simbadol were not significantly different from those administered Vetergesic, and some cats administered Vetergesic developed resentment to the administration of the drug, which was not significantly different from those administered Simbadol. Long-term analgesia is required after dental extractions in cats with severe oral disease. A decrease in food intake and specific behaviors identified in the studies could be used to differentiate painful versus pain-free cats in clinical practice. The FGS is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cats undergoing dental extractions. Simbadol produced similar analgesic effects to Vetergesic without resentment during drug administration.

Keyphrases: Nutrition, Analgesia, Behavior, Buprenorphine, Dentistry, Facial expression, Feline, Pain, Pain assessment, Video analysis