Évolution de la gestion pharmacologique de la polyarthrite rhumatoïde et impact sur le risque de fracture ostéoporotique non vertébrale

Over the past two decades, progresses in the understanding of disease etiology, the arrival of new drugs, and the development of clinical practice guidelines may have led to a better pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoporosis, a common comorbidity. In this thesis, three research questions were investigated using well characterized administrative databases (RAMQ and MED-ECHO).  A first study documented RA drug use in the province of Quebec. To this date, this is the only Canadian study to report on patterns of biologic DMARD use since their introduction in clinical practice. Over our study time horizon (2002-2008), the use of any DMARDs (synthetic and biologic) slightly increased in the overall RA population (1.9%, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8). However, despite clinical practice guidelines stressing the importance of early treatment, and the reimbursement of treatments by the Quebec drug plan, the results demonstrated suboptimal DMARD initiation in newly diagnosed RA (probability at 12 months: 38.5%), though DMARD initiation increased when rheumatologists were overseeing care (OR: 4.31, 95%CI: 3.73-4.97). For biologic DMARDs, the strongest predictor of initiation was the calendar year of study entry. Of subjects newly diagnosed in 2002, 1.2 in 1000 had a biologic initiated within one year, while for those newly diagnosed in 2007, it was 13.0 in 1000. The results showed that the pharmacological management of RA is improving over time, but remains below expectations. Ensuring better access to rheumatologists should be an area of focus in order to enhance the quality of RA care.  A second study reported on biologic DMARD use and the risk of non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in RA patients aged ≥50 years. Because chronic inflammation in RA interferes with bone remodeling and biologic DMARDs, in addition to their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, are modulators of the cellular activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts possibly leading to the preservation of bone mineral density (BMD), it was believed that their use may reduce the risk of fractures. A nested-case control study was conducted. Although a reduction in the risk of fractures subsequent to biologic DMARD use could not be demonstrated (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.42-2.53), the study established the incidence rate of non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in a Canadian RA population (11/1000 person-years) and highlighted some important risk factors. The high prevalence of osteoporosis in the RA population justifies that more attention be paid to preventing fractures.  Finally, a third study investigated the impact of the 2002 Canadian osteoporosis guidelines on the pharmacological management of osteoporosis and on the rates of non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in a RA population aged ≥50 years between 1998 and 2008. With the availability of effective osteoporosis treatments since the mid 90s, and the evolving clinical practice guidelines, a reduction in the rate of fractures was expected. Some Canadian studies have shown reductions in the rate of fractures following broader use of osteoporosis drugs and BMD testing in a general adult population, but none have specifically investigated the impact in RA. In this observational study using a time series approach, no reduction in the rate of fractures after 2002 (post guidelines dissemination) could be demonstrated. However, the use of osteoporosis drugs, BMD testing, and provision of post fracture osteoporosis care improved. This study demonstrated that years of availability of effective preventive measures and investments in the development and promotion of clinical practice guidelines have not yet translated into further reduction in the rate of fractures in our RA population over our study time horizon.   This body of work is the first to examine, using healthcare administrative data, subjects with RA over a period of 11 years, allowing not only to study the changes in clinical practice following the introduction of new treatments and guidelines, but also to capture the impact on health. In addition, by studying predictors of treatment, the results provide good insights in terms of solutions to fill the gap between the observed clinical practice and guideline recommendations. Finally, the results of these studies substantiate the literature regarding the quality of RA care and the prevention of fractures.

Keyphrases: Fracture, DMARD, ARMM, Rheumatoid arthritis, Osteoporosis, Fracture, DMARDs, Biologic DMARDs, Drug utilization study, Nested case-control, Observational study, Administrative database