Ecological effects of flow and temperature regimes on fish communities in temperate rivers

Widespread anthropogenic impacts to river ecosystems are currently changing the naturaly variability of flow and temperature regimes, with potentially important repercussions on the stability and function of aquatic communities. Although fish community responses to flow alterations from river regulation have been quantified in the past (e.g. late maturation of salmonid populations due to attenuated flows or stranding of fishes from down-ramping flows), the scarcity of high quality, long-term data, especially in Canadian rivers, has limited our understanding of the effect this has had on other environmental drivers and  fish community structure across this heterogenous landscape. Using extensive field surveying across unregulated and regulated rivers in Alberta, Ontario, Québec, and New Brunswick coupled with data from national, provincial, and private flow and water temperature gauge networks, I showed the effects of flow and thermal regimes on fish diversity, density, biomass, and different types of ecological guilds. I also examined the extent to which different regulation practices have modulated the response of riverine fish to the combined effect of changes to flow and thermal regimes.  To first establish a methodology for quantifying fish community structure across rivers, I generated reliable site-specific species richness, density, and biomass metrics that combined measures from two commonly used surveying methods. To then quantify the response of these fish community metrics to river regulation, I defined daily and hourly flow indices based on river flow conditions, developed hydrologic regime variables that described dominant patterns of flow variation, and calculated flow alterations based on the difference in multivariate space of these hydrologic regime variables for regulated rivers from reference flow conditions. By applying this same approach to fish community metrics, I identified a significant positive relationship between biotic and flow alterations and showed a separation between the two most distinct flow regulation types, run-of-river (ROR) and hydro-peaking. To tease apart the relative importance of each environmental driver for establishing fish communities across river regimes, I provided quantitive thermal indices based on river water temperatures and developed thermal variables akin to those described for flow regimes. To evaluate whether quantitative fish guild estimates, rather than total river biomass or density estimates, would respond more strongly to river thermal regimes, I compared the response of different types of fish guilds to flow and thermal regimes across rivers, including those subjected to river regulation. All fish guild models performed better relative to studying total river estimates, confirming the use of trait-environmental relationships for studying fish community responses across rivers. I also found that integrating thermal regimes in hydro-ecological studies is critical in predicting fish guild responses across rivers.   Collectively, these findings have important repercussions for river management, as they provide comprehensive assessments of the environmental variables driving fish community responses, inform the potential range of ecological consequences of anthropogenic alterations on natural flow regimes, and contribute to establishing more transferable predictions for restoring impacted rivers. More broadly, the thesis results are important given future global climate warming, its synergistic effects with other anthropogenic stressors, and ongoing scarcity for water and energy sources.

Keyphrases: biotic variation, hydrologic regimes, thermal regimes, Canadian rivers, fish