Les croyances des enseignants et des apprenants adultes quant à la rétroaction corrective à l’oral et la pratique réelle en classe de français langue étrangère en Égypte

Previous research revealed that Egyptian learners of French as a foreign language who will be the future teachers of French in Egypt produce numerous errors repetitively during oral productions. While this lack of accuracy can be attributed to a cohort of factors (number of students in class, duration of course, age and motivation of students, methods of teaching, etc.), it is assumed in the present study that corrective feedback could be at the origins of the reported results. Defined as implicit or explicit teacher reactions to the learners’ incorrect renditions, corrective feedback is seen by many second language acquisition researchers (Schmidt, 1983, 2001; Long, 1991, 1996; Lightbown, 1998) as a driving force behind interlanguage development. Among other things, corrective feedback draws learners’ attention to form and helps them notice the gap between their interlanguage and the L2 norm. In light of these theoretical arguments along with empirical research findings indicating the benefits of corrective feedback, the present study investigated corrective feedback provided in French as a foreign language classes in Egyptian universities. More specifically, the study explored teachers’ and students’ beliefs about feedback as well as teachers’ in-class use of feedback. Previous research on beliefs indicates that teachers’ beliefs shape their teaching and that learners’ beliefs affect their motivation and determine the effort students are willing to deploy to learn the target language. Based on these theoretical and empirical claims, the present study investigated teachers’ and students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback in learning French as a foreign language in Egypt and explored teachers’ actual corrective feedback practices to determine the extent to which they correspond to their declared beliefs.   A beliefs questionnaire was administered to 175 students and 25 language teachers to determine their beliefs about corrective feedback. Nine of the 25 teachers were also interviewed and observed for a total of 27 hours to further investigate their beliefs and in-class practices.   The results indicate a mismatch between teachers’ and students’ beliefs on the one hand, and a divergence between teachers’ beliefs and their actual teaching on the other. In terms of the relationship between students’ and teachers’ beliefs, the results reveal that while the majority of the learners do not see recasts as an effective feedback technique, almost half of the teachers do. As for the mismatch between teachers’ beliefs and their in-class practices, a two-fold pattern emerged. First, all the teachers reported that error type determined the technique they used to correct errors and that they preferred to push their learners to self-correct. However, recasts proved to be the technique of choice and that was regardless of error type. Instances of self-correction were rare with teachers choosing to recast most of their students’ errors instead of pushing them to remedy the errors on their own. As such, it may be speculated that the teachers’ choice of corrective feedback techniques, which happens to run counter to the students’ expectations (as shown in the beliefs questionnaire) may be a major factor behind the students’ reported lack of accuracy

Keyphrases: Incitation, Teacher beliefs, Adult learners’ beliefs, Corrective feedback, Prompts, Negotiation of form, French as a Foreign Language