Validation des modèles de pharmacologie de sécurité et évaluation de la valeur thérapeutique de l'oxytocine dans le traitement de l'infarctus du myocarde

In february 2009, a report from PHRMA (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America) confirmed that more than 300 drugs for treatment of cardiovascular diseases were in clinical trials or under review by regulatory agencies. Despite the abundance of new cardiovascular therapies, the number of new drugs approved each year (all indications combined) is declining steadily with only 17 and 24 new drugs approved in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Only 1 drug out of 5000 candidates will be approved after 10 to 15 years of development with an average cost of $800 millions. Several initiatives have been launched by regulatory agencies to increase the success rate in drug development but results are still awaited. This stagnation is attributed to the lack of efficacy of several drug candidates but safety assessments are the leading cause of drug development discontinuation. Primum non nocere, the maxim from Hippocrate, father of medicine, remains of major relevance in preclinical and clinical drug development.  Over the past 20 years, approximately 3% of approved drugs were subsequently withdrawn from the market due to adverse effects. Cardiovascular adverse effects represent the most frequent cause of drug development discontinuation or withdrawal (27%) followed by effects on the nervous system. After defining the context of safety pharmacology evaluations and the use of biomarkers in drug development, we validated safety pharmacology models to investigate drug-induced cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological effects.  As we progressed within constraints and challenges of drug development, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxytocin, an endogenous peptide with therapeutic potential. Oxytocin (OT), a hormone historically associated with reproduction, demonstrated the ability to induce in vitro differentiation of cell lines (P19) but also embryonic stem cells into beating cardiomyocytes. These observations lead us to consider the use of OT as a treatment for myocardial infarct. To achieve this ultimate goal, we first evaluated the pharmacokinetic of OT in an anesthetized rat model. These investigations highlighted the unique characteristics of OT including a very short half-life and a non-linear pharmacokinetic profile in response to the dose.  Cardiovascular effects of OT in healthy animals were then evaluated in various species. In preclinical research, the use of various animal species and state of consciousness (conscious or anesthetized) is recognized as one of the best strategies to increase the predictive value of results obtained in animals to the human response. Our initial investigations of OT treatment regimens used various animal models including conscious and anesthetized rats, anesthetized pigs, conscious dogs with indirect blood pressure monitoring and diuresis and conscious monkeys with cardiovascular telemetry monitoring. These studies confirmed OT to have significant hemodynamic effects with variable responses depending on the state of consciousness (conscious or anesthetized), the dose, the administration protocol (bolus or infusion) and the species that were used. These screening studies enabled selection of a treatment regimen and dose without adverse effects that could subsequently be tested in efficacy studies. A porcine myocardial infarct (MI) model with reperfusion was used to evaluate the effects of OT following myocardial ischemia. In a pilot project, continuous infusion of OT initiated immediately at coronary reperfusion induced cardiovascular adverse effects in all treated animals including a reduction of left ventricular fraction shortening and worsening of dilated cardiomyopathy which is typical following MI. Considering these observations, the therapeutic strategy was revised to avoid OT treatment during the inflammatory phase which was considered maximal around day 3 post-ischemia. When initiated 8 days after MI, OT infusion induced adverse effects in animals with elevated endogenous levels of OT. In contrast, no significant effects (not statistically significant improvement) were observed in animals with low endogenous OT baseline. In placebo treated animals, a trend to observe a better recovery was noted in animals with high endogenous OT baseline. While the size of the ischemic zone was comparable to human patients with MI, the use of juvenile animals and the absence of coronary disease are important limitations of the porcine model.   The potential of OT for treatment of MI remains but our results suggest that systemic administration of OT by continuous infusion as part of a replacement therapy should be investigated further in relation to endogenous levels. Further investigations on safety of the treatment with OT on animal MI models are warranted before the use of OT can be considered in the patient population after myocardial infarct. On the other hand, endogenous levels of OT may have a prognostic value and clinical trials to investigate this hypothesis may be of interest.

Keyphrases: Fraction d’Éjection, Porc, Oxytocin, Safety Pharmacology, Cardiovascular effects, Pharmacology, Physiology, Toxicology, Preclinical study, Myocardial infarct, Ejection fraction, Planimetry, Pig, Therapeutic use, Continuous infusion, Pharmacokinetic