Encodage des forces tactiles dans le cortex somatosensoriel primaire

The two most important functions of the hand are object manipulation and tactile exploration. The detection of slip provided by specialized mechanoreceptors in the glabrous skin is essential for the execution of both these functions. During object manipulation, the early detection of incipient slip leads to a grip force increase in order to prevent dropping an object. Slip is also an important aspect of tactile exploration because it greatly increases the acuity of touch perception. In both actions, normal and tangential forces on the skin can describe slip itself but also what occurs just before slip. However, little is known about how these self-generated forces are encoded at the cortical level. To better understand this encoding, we recorded from single neurons in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) as monkeys executed two haptic tasks. In the first task, two monkeys grasped a stationary metal tab with a key grip and exerted shear forces, without slip, in one of four orthogonal directions. Of 144 recorded neurons, 111 (77%) had activity modulated with shear force directions. These preferred shear force vectors were distributed in every direction with tuning arcs varying from 50° to 170°. Also, more than 21 (19%) of these neurons had a firing rate correlated with shear force magnitude. Even if 66 (59%) modulated neurons showed clear slowly adapting response and 45 (41%) other neurons a rapidly adapting response, this classification failed to explain the modulation to force direction and magnitude. These results show that S1 neurons encode force direction and magnitude simultaneously even in the absence of slip.  In the second task, two monkeys scanned different surfaces with the fingertips in search of a tactile target without visual feedback. During the exploration, the monkeys, like humans, carefully controlled the finger forces and speeds. High friction surfaces offered greater tangential shear force resistance to the skin that was associated with decrease of the normal contact forces. Furthermore, the scalar sum of the normal and tangential forces remained constant. These observations demonstrate that monkeys control the applied normal and tangential finger forces within a narrow range which is adjusted according to surface properties such as texture and friction. Of the 230 recorded neurons during tactile exploration, 96 (42%) showed instantaneous frequency changes in relation to finger forces. Of these, 52 (54%) were correlated with either the normal or tangential force magnitude with little or no influence from the other orthogonal force component. Another subset of 44 neurons (46%) responded to the ratio between normal and tangential forces regardless of magnitude. Namely, 29 neurons (30%) increased and 15 (16%) others decreased their discharge frequency related to this ratio, which corresponds to the coefficient of friction. Tangential force direction significantly modulated about half the recorded neurons (112). Of these, 59 (53%) responded to both direction and force magnitude. Of the 102 neurons recorded during exploration of three or more surfaces, 17 (17%) showed increased firing rate with increased surface friction and 8 (8%) presented the opposite behavior. However, 37 (36%) neurons seemed to discharge optimally for one of the surfaces without any linear relation to the surfaces’ coefficient of friction. The classification of rapidly and slowly adaptation for neuronal responses in S1 could not be associated with the modulation to forces or direction. These results show that the firing rates of S1 neurons reflect the tangential and normal force magnitude, the ratio of the two forces and the direction of finger movement. These results show that the activity of a significant subpopulation of S1 neurons is represented by normal and tangential forces on the skin. This force modulation uses a frame of reference that can be applied with or without slip. This aspect provides a link between investigations of the cortical representation of surface properties and studies on object manipulation. Our results regarding the distinction between rapidly and slowly adapting neurons leads us to suggest that this difference is a consequence of the manner in which the skin was stimulated. A potential motor component in the modulation of S1 neurons during these sensorimotor tasks is also discussed. Finally, a novel three-dimensional reference frame is proposed to describe, as a single continuum, the different modulations to forces observed in S1 during tactile exploration.

Keyphrases: Force, Somatosensory cortex, Finger, haptic, Electrophysiology, Force