Psychothérapie et émancipation sociale : une exploration éthique et sociologique

This theoretical thesis is about psychotherapy and particularly about two forms - psychoanalysis and brief therapy as conceived by the Palo Alto group – which are examined within debates bearing on metatheoretical efforts to think modernity, postmodernity and related phenomena: rationalization, individuation, scepticism or cognitive and moral relativism. As an alternative to popular ideas suggesting that psychotherapy is essentially a narcissistic practice, the proposed thesis is that psychotherapy could also be considered an emancipatory practice on a social level by contributing to the moral development of individuals.  This is demonstrated using resources supplied by the sociological tradition, especially the notion of rationalization. This moral development of individuals would be emphasized by self-reflexive functioning and communicative competences, this last term representing moral consciousness in Habermas’ thinking. But in order that there be self-reflexive functioning, one has to accept the idea that one has a capacity to know and to know himself or herself, an idea which is not clearly accepted by self-proclaimed «postmodern» therapies at the turn of the millennium.  An examination of discourses held by practitioners reveals an influence by postmodernism, whether in the form of constructivism, social constructionism or more generally scepticism with a related refusal of expertise and authority, a paradoxical situation for a professional practice. The two forms of therapy examined are presumed to represent the opposite poles of typical rationalities regarding therapeutic change: the strategic-technical vs the expressive-communicational. The therapies are naturally compared and evaluated against proposals put forward by Habermas regarding, among others, the two distinct rationalities that he sees at work in late modern societies and the ideal speech situation. Psychotherapy appears in this context as a most valuable contribution to Lifeworld rationalization. Having defined and evaluated the notions of modernity and postmodernism to grasp the intellectual background to key postures in postmodern therapies, the theoretical exploration continues with a critical and detailed examination of works by Foucault bearing on disciplinary practices, the great objection to seeing psychotherapy as emancipatory. The examination tends to show that his analysis does not reflect the contemporary situation regarding psychotherapy.  The thesis examines also the Habermas-Foucault debate on critique and power: if knowledge is always the product of power relations and if it always has power effects, how can it practice critique? The work of Habermas offers not only more support to the general thesis but also a more differentiating and more well-balanced theorization of modernity, while Foucault, besides that he offers no hope of progress or gains in rationality, bequeaths us a more realistic conception of power – it is a part of all communication and interaction – but also more fatalist, without possibility of redemption by knowledge. The thesis ends with a review of the notion of individualism with L. Dumont, Lipovetsky, Taylor and Bellah et al. to discuss social phenomena associated by certain critics to psychotherapy, notably instrumental relations.

Keyphrases: Habermas, Foucault, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, Palo Alto group, systemic approach, constructivism, social emancipation, ethics, postmodernism, Habermas, Foucault