Destins des S-RNases et interactions moléculaires dans le tube pollinique dans le cadre de l’auto-incompatibilité gamétophytique chez Solanum chacoense

Self-incompatibility (SI) is a prezygotic reproductive barrier that allows the pistil of a flower to specifically reject their own (self-) pollen. SI systems can help prevent self-fertilization and avoid inbreeding. In gametophytic SI (GSI), the genotype of the pollen determines its breeding behaviour and in this system both female and male specificity determinants of SI are under the control of a multigenic and multiallelic locus called the S-locus. In Solanaceae, the female determinant of SI is a highly polymorphic stylar-expressed extracellular glycoprotein with RNase activity called the S-RNase. S-RNases show a distinct pattern of two hypervariable (HVa and HVb) regions, responsible for their allelic specificity, and five highly conserved regions (C1 to C5) thought to be involved in either the catalytic activity or the structural stabilization of the protein. In this work, we analyzed and characterized several conserved features of the S-RNases and also identified a potential novel S-RNase interactant in Solanum chacoense.  The aim of our first study was to investigate the role of the C4 region of S-RNases. To test the hypothesis that the C4 region may be involved in S-RNase folding or stability, we examined a mutant in which the four charged residues in the C4 region were replaced with glycine. This mutant did not accumulate to detectable levels in styles, supporting a structural role for C4. To test the possibility that C4 might be involved in binding another protein, we prepared an R115G mutant, in which a charged amino acid was eliminated to reduce any potential binding to this region. This mutant had no effect on the pollen rejection phenotype of the protein, and thus C4 is likely not involved in either ligand binding or S-RNase entry inside pollen tubes. Finally, a K113R mutant, in which the only conserved lysine residue in all the S-RNases was replaced with arginine, was generated to test if this residue was an S-RNase ubiquitination site. However, S-RNase degradation was not disrupted in this mutant. Taken together, these results indicate that the C4 region likely plays a structural role.  In a second study, we analyzed the role of S-RNase glycosylation. All S-RNases share a conserved glycosylation site in the C2 region. To test the possibility that the sugar residues might be a target for ubiquitination, a transgenic S11-RNase lacking its single glycosylation site was examined. This construct behaved similarly to a wild type S11-RNase, demonstrating that the lack of glycosylation does not confer constitutive pollen rejection. To determine if the introduction of an N-linked glycan in the HVa region would affect pollen rejection, a construct containing a second N-glycosylation site inside the HVa region of the S11-RNase and a construct containing only that N-glycosylation site inside the HVa region were prepared. The first construct rejected S11 pollen normally, but surprisingly, plants expressing the construct lacking the C2 glycosylation site rejected both S11 and S13 pollen. We propose that the non-glycosylated form is a dual specific allele, similar to a previously described dual-specific allele that also had amino acid replacements in the HV regions. Interestingly, this phenotype is not observed in the mutant containing two glycosylation sites, which suggests that the sugar residues are not removed during S-RNase entry into the pollen.  In the final study, S-RNase-binding assays were performed with pollen extracts to detect potential interacting proteins. We found that concanavalin A-immobilized S11-RNase bound eEF1A, a component of the eukaryotic translational machinery. This interaction was validated by pull-down experiments using a GST-tagged S. chacoense eEF1A. We also found that a previously documented actin binding to eEF1A was markedly increased in the presence of S-RNases, although S-RNases alone do not bind actin. Lastly, we observed that actin in incompatible pollen tubes has an unusual aggregated form which also co-labels with S-RNases. This suggests that binding between S-RNases and eEF1A could provide a potential functional link between the S-RNase and the alteration of the actin cytoskeleton that occurs during the SI reaction. Furthermore, if eEF1A binding to S-RNases acted to titrate the amount of free S-RNase in the pollen tube, this binding may help explain the threshold phenomenon, where a minimum quantity of S-RNase in the style is required to trigger the SI reaction.

Keyphrases: Solanum chacoense, S-RNase, Glycosylation, eEF1A, Gametophytic self-incompatibility, Solanum chacoense, S-RNase, C4 conserved region, Glycosylation, Allelic recognition, Dual specificity, eEF1A, Actin, Threshold