Mécanismes moléculaires d’activation du récepteur A des peptides natriurétiques

Natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPRA) is a member of the particulate guanylate cyclase family. NPRA activation by natural agonists, ANP and BNP, leads to cGMP production, which is responsible for their role in cardiovascular homeostasis, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis inhibition and lipolysis regulation. NPRA is a non covalent dimer composed of an extracellular domain (ECD) with a ligand binding site, a single transmembrane region (TM), a kinase homology domain, and a guanylyl cyclase domain. Although NPRA plays an important physiologic role, molecular mecanisms driving its activation process are yet unknown. We thus analysed the first steps of NPRA’s activation process. First, we studied the role of ECD dimerization in receptor activation and determined the sequential steps of this dimerization process. We used radioligand binding, FRET and molecular modeling to characterize the interaction of ECD with natural agonists, a superagonist and an antagonist. ANP binds to preformed ECD dimers and spontaneous dimerization is the rate-limiting step of the ligand binding process. Furthermore, like demonstrated with fluorescence homoquenching, all the studied peptides, including A71915 antagonist, stabilize a dimeric form of the receptor. However, A71915 stabilizes the ECD dimer in a conformation distinct from those induced by ANP. Thus, ECD dimerization is necessary but not sufficient for NPRA activation. The activation state of NPRA seems to depend on the orientation of the receptor subunits within the dimer. Then, we tried to identify the molecular mechanism of signal transduction through the plasma membrane. Previous studies have shown that activation of NPRA involves a conformational change of the juxtamembrane domain (JM). However, crystallographic study of the soluble ECD of NPRA has failed to document JM structure, and the conformational change involved in transmembrane signal transduction is still unknown. To analyse this conformational change, we first sequentially substituted nine amino acids of JM by a cysteine residue. By studying the mutant’s capacity to form ANP-induced or constitutive covalent disulfide dimers, we evaluated the relative proximity of JM residues, before and after NPRA activation. These results demonstrate a high proximity of specific JM residues and are in disagreement with crystallography data. We also demonstrated that intracellular domain imposes a conformational constraint on JM at basal state, which becomes relaxed upon ANP binding. We finally confirmed, with a full-length receptor, that A71915 stabilizes NPRA in a dimeric form where JM are in a conformation distinct from the basal state. By introducing 1 to 5 alanine residues in the transmembrane α-helix, we showed that a TM rotation of 40° leads to constitutive NPRA activation. Activation signal could thus be transmitted through the membrane by a TM rotation mechanism. We finally studied the role of the TM in NPRA dimerization. By using the ToxR system, we demonstrated that the last JM residues are required to stabilize the TM dimer. Using these experimental data, we generated the first molecular model illustrating the active conformation of NPRA, where JM and TM are depicted. In summary, this study allows a better understanding of molecular mecanisms driving the first steps of NPRA’s complex activation process.

Keyphrases: Guanylate cyclase, Rotation, FRET, Signal transduction, Conformational change, Dimerization, Cysteine-scanning