L'effet du pays d'origine des entreprises multinationales sur les pratiques de relations du travail dans leurs opérations canadiennes

The purpose of this research is to study labour relations in multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in Canada.  Our research question is : “Does the country of origin of an MNC have an impact on the labour relations practices in its Canadian operations? ». Two main theses are put forward in the literature in order to explain the choices of MNCs in the adoption and the establishment of practices. The first one is the diversity thesis, which takes for granted that several endogenous and exogenous determinants of the MNC influence its practices (Mcgraw and Harley, 2003).  The characteristics of the host country as well as those of the country of origin influence the choices of practices of MNCs, which are contributing to their diversity (Almond and al., 2005). For example, some researchers explain that MNCs are literally impregnated with characteristics coming from the country from which they originated, that it would be literally part of their DNA affecting the practices that they set up in their abroad subsidiaries (Shepherd, 2006).  At the opposite, the convergence thesis asserts that MNCs tend all to use the same practices because of globalisation and American economic hegemony (Mcgraw and Harley, 2003). The supporters of this thesis believe in a convergence of the practices through MNCs because of the vast diffusion of the Anglo-Saxon model of management, the best practices and the one best way approaches (Mcgraw and Harley, 2003; Royle, 2006).  Is there a convergence or a diversity of the practices? The debate remains strong in the literature.  In addition to contributing to this debate, our research further explores the behaviour of foreign MNCs in Canada, and the particularities of Canadian MNCs.      The conceptual model developed here is based on the diversity thesis, more specifically the effect of the country of origin. According to the literature, several variables influence the practices of MNCs: the country of origin (Almond and al., 2005; Kvinge and Ulrichsen, 2008; Marginson, 2008; Edwards and Ferner, 2002; Collings, 2003; Ferner, 1997, Moore and Rees, 2008; etc) and the characteristics specific to the MNCs (Bartlett and Ghosal, 1998; Kidger, 2002; Perlmutter, 1969; Edwards, 2003).  In this research, the dependent variable, the labour relations practices, has five dimensions: union recognition in the new establishments, the trade union implication policy, management perception of the trade union representatives, the collective bargaining structure and the autonomy of the subsidiary in the development of labour relations policies (Bélanger and al., 2006).   The principal assumption of our research is: the country of origin of a MNC has an impact on the choice of the practices of labour relations in its Canadian operations. Five sub-assumptions, corresponding to the dimensions of the concept of labour relations, were tested: 1) American MNCs less often recognize trade unions in their new establishments than MNCs of other countries; 2) American MNCs have a worse managerial perception of the trade union than those coming from other countries; 3) Collective bargaining is more decentralized in American MNCs than in those of other countries; 4) American MNCs are less likely to include trade unions in their decision-making than those coming from other countries; 5) There is less autonomy in the development of policies concerning trade union representation in American MNCs than in MNCs from other countries.   The methodology of this study uses secondary data coming from the Survey on Employment Practices, Public Policy and the Global Value Chain carried out by Bélanger, Harvey, Jalette, Lévesque and Murray (2006). We study a subsample of the data base, composed of one hundred MNCs whose employees are unionised.  The results show that Canadian operations of Canadian MNCs differ from those of American MNCs.  Canadian MNCs have a better perception of the unions and involve more unions in decision-making.  European MNCs are more likely to recognize trade unions in new establishments, perceive greater union collaboration and grant greater autonomy regarding labour relations to their Canadian operations, as compared to American MNCs.  The Canadian operations of MNCs of the rest of the world are distinguished from American MNCs by a stronger perception of union collaboration.

Keyphrases: Canada, Multinational corporations, Labour relations, Country of origin, United-States of America, Globalisation