Essais sur des questions internationales en économie de l'environnement

This thesis is composed of three papers. The first paper studies the problem of global pollution in the context of environmental uncertainty. The second paper has to do with international environmental agreements. The third paper shows how trade liberalization can affect welfare and pollution taxes in a world of heterogeneous countries and transboundary pollution.  In the first paper, I consider a world where countries suffer uniformly from global pollution while facing a continuous threat that the damages from this global pollution will suddenly jump to an irreversible high-damage state. I characterize the equilibrium level of emissions, the equilibrium stock of global pollution and the discounted net social welfare for both the cooperative and non-cooperative equilibria. The purpose is to analyze the impact of this type of uncertainty on the equilibrium behavior of the countries. I find that this uncertainty can have a significant effect on those equilibria. Countries reduce their emissions to mitigate their exposure to that threat. As the level of threat rises, countries adjust their emissions to lower the stock of pollutant. However, although initially this type of uncertainty has the effect of lowering the discounted net welfare, it can in the long run have a net positive effect on welfare.  The second paper extends the standard model of self-enforcing dynamic international environmental agreements by allowing the length of the period of commitment of such agreements to vary as a parameter. It analyzes the pattern of behavior of the size of stable coalitions, the stock of pollutant and the emission rate as a function of the length of the period of commitment. It is shown that the length of the period of commitment can have very significant effects on the equilibrium. Three distinct intervals for the length of the period of commitment are identified, across which the equilibrium and its dynamic behavior differ considerably. Whereas for sufficiently high values of the period of commitment only self-enforcing agreements by a small number of countries are possible, for sufficiently low such values cooperation on the part of a very high number of countries can be occur. Lengths of periods of commitment between those two thresholds are characterized by an inverse relationship between the length of commitment and the membership size of the agreement. This suggests that considerable attention should be given to the determination of the length of such international agreements.  The third paper considers a trade situation where the production activities of potentially heterogeneous countries generate pollution which can cross borders and harm the well-being of all the countries involved. In each of those countries the policy maker levies pollution taxes on the polluting firms and a tariff on imports in order to correct that distortion. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the effect of a reduction in the tariff on equilibrium pollution taxes and welfare. The existing literature has investigated this problem for trade between two identical countries. This paper analyzes the problem in the more realistic context where countries are not necessarily identical and trade can be multilateral. It becomes possible to show what bias is introduced when those two realities are neglected. I find that a tariff reduction can actually lower output; it can also lower welfare even if pollution is purely local.

Keyphrases: Risque, Commerce International, Global pollution, International environmental agreements, International trade, asymmetry, Risk, Dynamic games, Stochastic differential games, Imperfect markets