Évaluation de la reconstruction des ligaments croisés post luxation aiguë du genou avec l’utilisation des ligaments synthétiques

Knee dislocation, although very rare, remains a devastating injury with many complications because of the complex nature of this trauma. This uncommon injury can result from either a high or low energy trauma. The severe damage to the knee’s ligaments and associated structures render this injury at high potential for functional impairment. Non operative treatment which was once deemed acceptable, is now reserved for very low demand patients. Surgical reconstruction is now the standard of care for most patients, however many options exist but the optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. Some surgeons advocate early complete reconstruction of all damaged ligaments, whereas others who fear arthrofibrosis, limit the immediate surgery to reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and the posterolateral corner. Because of the multiple structures damaged by knee dislocations, surgeons have been successfully using combinations of autografts and allografts for complete knee ligament reconstruction. Complications associated with graft harvesting, graft elongation and early weakness as well as risks for disease transmission has pushed surgeons to look for different options. The use of synthetic material for ligament replacement was proposed in the 1980’s. After an initial wave of enthusiasm, poor long term results and high rates of failure diminished its popularity. Since then, a new generation of artificial ligaments has emerged, the Ligament Advanced Reinforced System (LARS) has shown promising results. It recently has been used in isolated anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and has shown good short to medium term results. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the knee function and stability after acute knee dislocation reconstructed with LARS artificial ligaments. This study assessed the results of 71 patients with knee dislocations who underwent acute combined repair and reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament using LARS artificial ligaments. After the surgery all patients followed the same intensive rehabilitation protocol. Progressive weight bearing was permitted over 6 weeks as muscle strength and dynamic stability were regained. The outcome measures used were the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee form, the Short Form-36, clinical knee stability testing, a goniometer to mesure the range of motion and Telos stress radiography at 30° and 90° of knee flexion. The non-operated knee of the patient was used as a baseline for the operated knee. The subjective and objective findings from this study are satisfactory and suggest that acute combined repair and reconstruction with LARS ligaments is a valid alternative for treating acute knee dislocations. These findings demonstrate sustained results in terms of function and revealed durability of LARS artificial ligaments at long-term. Patients seem to get more autonomous and satisfied with time even though acute knee dislocation is seen as a catastrophe when it happens. Randomised, prospective trials are now needed to compare graft selection and timing of the surgical reconstruction.

Keyphrases: Reconstruction, Knee dislocation, Reconstruction, Posterior cruciate ligament, Anterior cruciate ligament, Artificial ligament