The impact of topical prostaglandin analogs on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with open angle glaucoma

Rationale: Glaucoma is a chronic disease that causes a gradual loss of vision due to progressive damage to the optic nerve.  It is widespread in the world and causes blindness in about seven million people. In addition, it affects more than 400,000 Canadians and its prevalence is increasing with the aging of the population.1, 2          Glaucoma becomes symptomatic only in the more advanced stages of the disease, and currently, the goal of treatment is to halt the progression of the disease by lowering the intra-ocular pressure (IOP). Topical prostaglandin analogs (PGA) are currently the first line treatment, however research has shown that this class of medications may change certain properties of the cornea, and hence the measurement of IOP.3 Aim: To determine whether the use of topical prostaglandin analogs (PGA) affects the biomechanical properties of the cornea. The conclusion will be based on the integrated analysis of the data collected from the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), Goldmann tonometry and ultrasound pachymetry. The second potential aim of this study is to determine the correlations, if any, between the biomechanical properties of cornea, the Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) and IOP in patients undergoing topical PGA treatment. The main hypothesis of this study is that the PGA drops influence the properties of the cornea such as central thickness, elasticity and resistance.   Patients and Methods: In this study, seventy eyes of 35 patients, aged 50 - 85 years, with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and treated with topical PGA were examined. Only subjects with a manifest refraction between -6.00 D and +4.25 D were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with any other corneal eye disease, such as Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy or keratoconus, or any past history of corneal trauma or surgery. Contact lens wearers were also excluded. Patients with stable glaucoma parameters who were using topical PGA in both eyes prior to the start of the study were asked to discontinue the PGA in the best eye and to continue the application of PGA to the contralateral eye. The "best" eye, representing the eye with the least amount of glaucoma-related damage, was selected based on the results of the Humphrey Visual Field (HFA, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT II, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), Optical Coherence Tomography (CIRRUS HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA)  and maximum IOP. The contralateral eye served as a control for statistical analyses. Corneal measurements were taken before PGA cessation and repeated 6 weeks after cessation. Patients then restarted the use of PGA and all measurements were repeated once more after an additional 6 weeks. After starting or changing glaucoma treatment the patient should be seen approximately 4-6 weeks later to assess efficacy of the drop.4 For this reason it was decided to use 6 weeks interval. All measurements were performed at The Montreal Glaucoma Institute by the same trained technician, with the same equipment and at the same time of day. Goldmann applanation tonometry was used to measure the patient’s intraocular pressure (IOP), ultrasound pachymetry was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT) and the ORA provided the measurements of the corneal biomechanical properties, including corneal hysteresis (CH). The hypothesis of no effect regarding the discontinuation of PGA on the biomechanical properties was examined by a linear mixed-effect model using the nlme package in R. Random-effects was defined on two levels: the patient (level-1) and the eye within each patient (level-2). Those random-effects were added to the model to account for the intra-individual variance due to the repeated-measure design. Age was also included in the model as a covariate. Contrasts between the eyes and times were estimated using adjusted p-values to control for familywise error rate using multcomp package in R. Results:  A statistically significant increase in CH was found between Visit 1 (on PGA) and Visit 2 (no PGA) in the study eyes, with mean (±Standard Error) values of 8.98 ± 0.29 mmHg and 10.35 ± 0.29 mmHg, respectively, corresponding to a mean increase of 1.37 ± 0.18 mmHg (p < 0.001). A significant reduction of 1.25 ± 0.18 mmHg (p < 0.001) was also observed between Visits 2 and 3, with a final mean CH value of 9.09 ± 0.29 mmHg. In addition, a statistically significant difference between the study and control eyes was only observed at Visit 2 (1.01 ± 0.23 mmHg; p < 0.001) and not at Visits 1 and 3.  A statistically significant increase in Corneal Resistance Factor (CRF) was found between Visits 1 and 2 in the study eyes, with mean values of 10.23 ± 0.34 mmHg and 11.71 ± 0.34 mmHg, respectively. CRF was then reduced by 1.90 ± 0.21 mmHg (p < 0.001) between Visits 2 and 3, with a final mean CRF value of 9.81 ± 0.34 mmHg. A statistically significant difference between the study and control eyes was only observed at Visit 2 (1.46 ± 0.23 mmHg; p < 0.001).   A statistically significant increase in CCT was found between Visits 1 and 2 in the study eyes, with mean values of 541.83 ± 7.27 µm and 551.91 ± 7.27 µm respectively, corresponding to a mean increase of 10.09 ± 0.94 µm (p < 0.001). CCT then decreased by 9.40 ± 0.94 µm (p < 0.001) between Visits 2 and 3, with a final mean value of 542.51 ± 7.27 µm. A difference between the study and control eyes was only recorded at Visit 2 (11.26 ± 1.79 µm; p < 0.001).  Similarly, a significant increase in IOP was observed between Visits 1 and 2 in the study eyes, with mean values of 15.37 ± 0.54 mmHg and 18.37 ± 0.54 mmHg respectively, corresponding to a mean increase of 3.0 ± 0.49 mmHg (p < 0.001). A significant reduction of 2.83 ± 0.49 mmHg (p < 0.001) was observed between Visits 2 and 3, with a final mean IOP value of 15.54 ± 0.54 mmHg. The control and study eyes only differed at Visit 2 (1.91 ± 0.49 mmHg; p < 0.001), confirming the effectiveness of PGA treatment.  At Visit 1, the IOP bias (IOPcc – Goldmann IOP) was similar in both groups, all eyes at that time being on long term PGA medication, with mean values of 4.1 ± 0.54 mmHg in the control eyes and 4.8 ± 0.54 mmHg in the study eyes. At Visit 2, after a 6 week washout of PGAs, the IOP bias in the tested eye was reduced to 1.6 ± 0.54 mmHg (p<0.001), meaning that underestimation of IOP by Goldmann tonometry was significantly less than at Visit 1. The difference in mean IOP bias between the study and control eyes at Visit 2, however, did not reach statistical significance (p= 0.124).  A marginally significant increase of 1.53 ± 0.60 mmHg (p = 0.055) was observed between Visits 2 and 3 in the study eyes, with a final mean IOP bias value of 3.10 ± 0.54 mmHg in the study eyes and 2.8 ± 0.54 mmHg in the control eyes.  We then tried to determine if a low CH was associated with signs of more severe glaucoma progression among our open-angle glaucoma patients treated with PGA. When considering all eyes on PGA at the time of the first Visit, no association was found between VF damage and CH. However, when considering only eyes with more advanced glaucoma, a significant positive correlation was observed between VF MD and CH (B = 0.65; p = 0.003). A lower CH was associated with a more negative visual field MD value and thus greater glaucoma-related damage. Conclusions:  Topical prostaglandin analogs reduce CH, CRF, CCT and IOP in glaucomatous eyes. The changes in CH and CCT influence the measurement of IOP, and therefore, these changes should be taken into account when evaluating IOP lowering response to PGA medications. To discern an interaction between IOP and corneal hysteresis, further research should be conducted with intraocular pressure control. It can be achieved by using systemic medications that decrease IOP and do not influence biomechanical properties. It can also be achieved by using Pascal dynamic contour tonometry or a similar tonometer that does not depend on the biomechanical properties of the cornea.  Regarding the interaction between severity of glaucoma damage and corneal hysteresis, it was demonstrated that a lower CH was associated with a more negative visual field MD value. Key Words glaucoma – prostaglandin analogs – corneal hysteresis – central corneal thickness – intraocular pressure – biomechanical properties of the cornea.

Keyphrases: Glaucoma, Prostaglandin analogs, Corneal hysteresis, Central corneal thickness, Intraocular pressure, Biomechanical properties of the cornea