Is socioeconomic position early in life associated with physical activity during adulthood following the accumulation of risk model with additive effects?

Physical activity enhances health, yet only 4.8% of adults in Canada meet the recommended level. Among the determinants of physical activity, socioeconomic position shows some of the strongest and most consistent associations. Its association is found cross-sectionally during adolescence and cross-sectionally during adulthood. This thesis aimed to determine if there is a long-lasting, life course association between socioeconomic position early in life and physical activity during adulthood. If there was one, a second goal was to determine which theoretical model in life course epidemiology best described its pattern.  This thesis comprises three papers: a systematic review and two original contributions. In the systematic review, Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies that assessed socioeconomic position before age 18 years and physical activity at age ≥18 years. In the two original research papers, structural equation modeling was used to compare three competing models in life course epidemiology: the accumulation of risk model with additive effects, the accumulation of risk model with trigger effect, and the critical period model. Each of the original research paper used data from a large, nationally representative prospective cohort. In the first paper, models were compared in the 1970 British birth cohort (n=16,571). Social class was used as an indicator of socioeconomic position, and physical activity was assessed during leisure time, during transports, and at work. In the second paper, models were compared in the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (n=16,903). Education and income were used as indicators of socioeconomic position and physical activity was assessed during leisure-time only.   In the systematic review, 10,619 publications were reviewed by two independent investigators and 42 were retained. For outcome "physical activity" (all types and measures), a significant association with socioeconomic position before age 18 years was found in 26/42 studies (61.9%). When the only outcome considered was leisure-time physical activity, a significant association was found in 21/31 studies (67.7%). In a subset of 21 studies with more rigorous methodology, proportions of studies finding an association were higher: 15/21 (71.4%) for all types and measures of physical activity and 12/15 (80%) for leisure-time physical activity only. In our first original research paper, using British data on social class, we found that the accumulation of risk model with additive effects fit the data best in both men and women for all three domains of physical activity studied (leisure time, transports, and work). In our second original research paper, using Canadian data on leisure-time physical activity, we found that in men, the critical period model fit the data best for education and income, while in women, the accumulation of risk model with additive effects fit the data best for income, whereas education did not fit any model.  To conclude, our systematic review suggests that socioeconomic position early in life is associated with physical activity during adulthood. Results from our two original research papers indicate that the pattern of its association may be best represented by the accumulation of risk model with additive effects.

Keyphrases: Exercice, Public health, Epidemiology, Life course, Socioeconomic position, Socioeconomicstatus, Social class, Physical activity, Exercise, Motor activity