Les écoles privées à projet religieux ou spirituel : analyse de trois «communautés» éducatives : juive, musulmane et Steiner : à Montréal

For several years now, the legitimacy of private schools founded on religious or spiritual projects have been the object of thorny debates both in Quebec and elsewhere (Chapter 1). Unlike a number of normative studies already produced on this topic, this thesis presents an empirical contribution to understanding the reality of some such schools in Montreal. Our general objective consists of appreciating how the religious or spiritual dimensions of private schools specific to minority groups or social currents (Jewish, Muslim, Waldorf) are transferred into discourse and practices within the schools. Exploring schools that protect the educational projects of diverse minorities, this study opens a broader window onto ethnic and religious identities.   Here, I examine meaningful differences and similarities between three such schools. This is followed by an attempt to understand what discourse and practices within these schools tell us about common expectations with relation to education in a liberal context. I therefore pay attention (in Chapter 2), to interactions between the “secular” curriculum and a religious or spiritual perspective, as well as to the notion of autonomy in schooling, to citizenship training, and to the prioritization of educational values. Much like Juteau (1999), among others, I find these schools to be educational “communities”.   My methodological approach (Chapter 3), with an ethnographic orientation, draws on participant observation carried out in Grades 5 and 6 primary school classrooms, as well as in Years 1 and 2 secondary classrooms (approximately 3 days in each class). It also involves more than 45 interviews, carried out with teachers, school administrators, and the parents of students. Even though my approach does not involve identifying a relevant theory, I am nevertheless guided by the method of “grounded theory” as a means of analysing my data.  The first analytical chapter (Chapter 4), illustrates a more or less “ideal type” of communialization, given that the Waldorf school focuses on spiritual work without necessarily situating itself with relation to other social groups. This reflects how an identity distinction can be constructed through rooting oneself in a tradition and in a memory “created” by the school. Meanwhile, the Muslim school (Chapter 5) adapts references associated with the religion in an attempt to constitute a “bridge” between primary socialization and that of the host society. I argue that while the administration and the teachers of the school do not reinvent a belief system, they do not entirely reproduce an identical system from elsewhere either. With regards to the Jewish case (Chapter 6), most notably the school fosters the externalization of an ethno-religious community. The Jewish tradition being taught at school is often described as “non-religious traditionalism” by school officials, and therefore presents few re-interpretations or transformations of the tradition in the context of the school.   A last analytical chapter (Chapter 7) addresses the three schools in comparative scope, in order to put into perspective how these institutions transmit identitary cultures and lifestyles that exceed the framework of any of the schools, which encompass religious and/or spiritual beliefs without being reduced to these.

Keyphrases: Religion, Curriculum, Islam, Private religious schools, Community, Ethnicity, Autonomy, Citizenship training, Judaism, Waldorf pedagogy