Characterizing and comparing acoustic representations in convolutional neural networks and the human auditory system

Auditory processing in the human brain and in contemporary machine hearing systems consists of a cascade of representational transformations that extract and reorganize relevant information to enable task performance. This thesis is concerned with the nature of acoustic representations and the network design and learning principles that support their development. The primary scientific goals are to characterize and compare auditory representations in deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and the human auditory pathway. This work prompts several meta-scientific questions about the nature of scientific progress, which are also considered.   The introduction reviews what is currently known about the mammalian auditory pathway and introduces the relevant concepts in deep learning.The first article argues that the most pressing philosophical questions at the intersection of artificial and biological intelligence are ultimately concerned with defining the phenomena to be explained and with what constitute valid explanations of such phenomena. I highlight relevant theories of scientific explanation which we hope will provide scaffolding for future discussion. Article 2 tests a popular model of auditory cortex based on frequency-specific spectrotemporal modulations. We find that a linear model trained only on BOLD responses to simple dynamic ripples (containing only one fundamental frequency, temporal modulation rate, and spectral scale) can generalize to predict responses to mixtures of two dynamic ripples. Both the third and fourth article investigate how CNN representations are affected by various aspects of training. The third article characterizes the language specificity of CNN layers and explores the effect of freeze training and random weights. We observed three distinct regions of transferability: (1) the first two layers were entirely transferable between languages, (2) layers 2--8 were also highly transferable but we found some evidence of language specificity, (3) the subsequent fully connected layers were more language specific but could be successfully finetuned to the target language. In Article 4, we use similarity analysis to find that the superior performance of freeze training achieved in Article 3 can be largely attributed to representational differences in the penultimate layer: the second fully connected layer. We also analyze the random networks from Article 3, from which we conclude that representational form is doubly constrained by architecture and the form of the input and target. To test whether acoustic CNNs learn a similar representational hierarchy as that of the human auditory system, the fifth article presents a similarity analysis to compare the activity of the freeze trained networks from Article 3 to 7T fMRI activity throughout the human auditory system. We find no evidence of a shared representational hierarchy and instead find that all of our auditory regions were most similar to the first fully connected layer. Finally, the discussion chapter reviews the merits and limitations of a deep learning approach to neuroscience in a model comparison framework.   Together, these works contribute to the nascent enterprise of modeling the auditory system with neural networks and constitute a small step towards a unified science of intelligence that studies the phenomena that are exhibited in both biological and artificial intelligence.

Keyphrases: deep learning, audition, computational neuroscience, fMRI, speech, similarity analysis, parole