L’incapacité au travail liée aux troubles musculosquelettiques : aspects théoriques et différences de genre

Introduction: This thesis consists of three interrelated papers. The first one set out to clarify conceptual issues surrounding the notion of work ability/disability, its definition and its evolution over time. The aims of the second and third paper are to assess the differential effect of the determinants of time to return-to-work (RTW) and compensation duration by gender, as well as the related costs, in workers receiving long-term compensation benefits for musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs). Methods: The first study consists of developing an integrative concept map of work (dis)ability through the systematic scoping review of its definitions and a comparative analysis based on the grounded theory approach. In the second study, a cohort of 455 adults on long-term disability due to work-related MSIs of the back/neck/upper limb was followed for five years through structured interviews and administrative databases. Cox regression modeling stratified by gender was used to assess time to a first RTW of at least three days. In the third study, a register-based cohort of 13,073 men and 9032 women with long-term claims related to neck/back/upper-limb MSIs was followed for three years. Main outcomes were compensation duration and costs. Gender stratified extended Cox models were used to study the compensation duration and detect time-varying effects. Results: The definitions analyzed in the first study do not reflect a shared, integrated vision of the exact nature and attributes of work (dis)ability. However, there seems to be a relative consensus that work (dis)ability is a relational concept resulting from the interaction of multiple dimensions at different ecological levels (individual, organizational and societal). The second study showed that despite similar survival curves of time to RTW between men and women on long-term disability (p=0.920), several factors influencing RTW differed by gender. Women’s risk factors included older age (HR=0.734 - in 10 years unit), poor perceived economic status (HR=0.625), working ≥40 hours/week and having dependents (HR=0.508) and awareness of workplace-based occupational health and safety program (HR=0.598); higher gross annual income (in $10,000s) was a facilitator (HR=1.225). In men, being over 55 years old (HR=0.458), poor perceived economic status (HR=0.653), working ≥40 hours/week and high perceived physical workload (HR=0.720) and higher job insecurity (HR=0.825) negatively influenced time to RTW. The third study revealed that three years post-injury, 12.3% of men and 7.3% of women were still receiving compensation benefits, with a male-female cost ratio of 2.1:1 for all compensation claims. Effects of certain predictors (e.g. income, injury site or industry) differed markedly between men and women. Age and claim history had time-varying effects in men and women’s models respectively. Conclusion: The way work (dis)ability is defined has important implications for research, compensation and rehabilitation. Results also confirm the importance of gender-sensitive studies to investigate the determinants of RTW and time on compensation benefits.

Keyphrases: Work ability, Work disability, Concept map, Gender, Sex, Compensation, Return to work, Sickness absence