CELEX: 62006FJ0107
Public service
Officials

Officials – Promotion – Consideration of comparative merits
Where the appointing authority considers the comparative merits of candidates for promotion pursuant to Article 45 of the
Staff Regulations, it must examine all the relevant factors in each application carefully and impartially.
The fact that an official has been put forward for promotion, unsuccessfully, in previous promotion procedures constitutes
a factor which must be taken into account. That fact is a relevant aspect of merit, provided that the official concerned has
not lost merit in the interim.
The fact that such factors must be taken into account is confirmed by the general implementing provisions adopted by the Commission
for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, which provide that promotion must be awarded after comparison of individual merits
assessed over a period of time.
Failure to take into consideration previous proposals for promotion could also lead to different situations being treated
in the same way.
If it proved that the criteria adopted by the Promotion Committee for awarding promotion points prevented that particular
aspect of the merits from being taken into account, it would be the duty of the appointing authority, which is required to
comply with the rules on entitlement to advance to a higher level, to refrain from applying those criteria.
(see paras 67-68, 71-76, 103)
See:
C-269/90
Technische Universität München
[1991] ECR I‑5469, para. 14
T-169/89
Frederiksen
v
Parliament
[1991] ECR II‑1403, para. 69; T-30/04
Sena
v
EASA
[2005] ECR-SC I‑A‑113 and II‑519, para. 80; T-132/03
Casini
v
Commission
[2005] ECR-SC I‑A‑253 and II‑1169, para. 69; T-432/04
Parlante
v
Commission
[2007] ECR-SC I-A-2-0000 and II-A-2-0000, para. 97