MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by efilife | 2026-02-11 10:12:57+00:00
I wish you luck in running your project! I hope it gets a userbase - no matter how small, to show that a project like this can be sustainable financially.

Btw, it's great satisfaction in seeing your friends enjoy your product, I know that feeling. It's the greatest compliment when they stop complaining (because you've polished your project) and just use it
by fhd2 | 2026-02-11 10:13:24+00:00
> Anyway, it's not related to CoPilot, but because Notepad makes links clickable now...

True, not related to CoPilot, but if I understand your conclusion right (which I'm not sure about), it's not _just_ that links are clickable now, it's because Notepad actually does something with the links. Otherwise it'd be a browser vulnerability, and Notepad couldn't seriously be blamed.
by romanovcode | 2026-02-11 10:13:24+00:00
For a solo developer this is pretty useless. For a team where everyone uses same coding tool this might be useful.

I am afraid however that with these tools Claude Code will just copy this in 3 months and have it as standard functionality within itself as a plugin.

Also I find it ironic that this domain is blocking all AI tools to access it, I tried to ask AI to explain what is the product and it is blocking Claude/GPT access to the website.
by ramonga | 2026-02-11 10:13:35+00:00
this doesn't work. Most of people follow the workflow you described and call it a day. The problem comes later when, for example, you realise stripe gives a grace period when payment for a subscription fails but the subscription still shows as active in your backend (by this time bad actors have been abusing your software for months).

With stripe-no-webhooks the default behaviour is that subscriptions get cancelled when payment fails and you can deal with your internal logic by putting it inside onSubscriptionCancelled hook.

There are many of small quirks that can be extremely costly (for example if you offer an AI product) and we take care of this for you
by dwedge | 2026-02-11 10:13:58+00:00
> I don't think anyone is arguing that the usefulness of these AIs for real projects started at GPT 3.5/4

Only not in retrospect. But the arguments about "if you're not using AI you're being left behind" did not depend on how people in 2026 felt about those tools retrospectively. Cursor is 3 years old and ok 4 years might be an exaggeration but I've definitely been seeing these arguments for 2-3 years.
by dlcarrier | 2026-02-11 10:14:17+00:00
Try building a house, especially in California. You hire an engineer to draw up plans that comply with all regulations, and file a permit with the county. They wait several months, point out some random thing, and request proof that it is compliant. Your engineer shows the math, citing the building code that says to use it, and you give that to the county. Several months later, the same thing happens again.

I know a contractor that, after retiring, bought a lot and submitted plans to build his dream house. Ten years later, the county gave in and approved his permit, but he was too old to build the house. There's a big difference between 65 and 75.

Anything that is not automatic ministerial approval is common law, not civil law, and it lets the government do whatever they feel like doing, regardless of what the laws actually say.
by victorgk_ | 2026-02-11 10:15:05+00:00
Y Combinator, the world's most influential startup accelerator and the launchpad behind companies like Airbnb, Stripe, and Dropbox, has placed a massive bet on AI-native agencies. Through their Request for Startups (RFS) and the vocal advocacy of Group Partner Aaron Epstein, YC is signaling that the $700B+ professional services market is about to be fundamentally disrupted by AI-native delivery models. This is not a fringe thesis or a speculative bet on far-future technology. It is happening now, and the smartest money in Silicon Valley is positioning accordingly.
by joe_mamba | 2026-02-11 10:15:25+00:00
> It’s that the EU is explicitly built against that and if it happens it will come from the national governments (see Hungary)

So to prevent individual EU nations ever becoming authoritarian, like Hungary, we have to cede sovereignty and authority to the EU & EC unelected bureaucrats like Ursula VDL who take over as the main executive leaders, ensuring we'll no longer have the danger of national-level authoritarianism.

Hell of a solution.

Surely the better solution to issues like Hungary is ensuring we get more democracy to Hungarian people, not giving authority over Hungary to someone else the Hungarian people can't elect.
by Juliate | 2026-02-11 10:16:14+00:00
I don't think those kinds of realm (hell or heaven) exist anywhere but right where/who we are now.

And it very much depends from how you define what being hungry and foolish means: hungry of what? foolish according to who?

Curiosity, wonder is a kind of hunger; and for some, foolishness. Not playing by the rules is a form of foolishness, and depending on the context, and on who defines/thinks of the rules.

Satisfaction and contentment are good, but have you tried unsatisfaction and discontentment? They are also necessary, for without them, there is no movement, no change, no loss of equilibrium that calls for your noticing, your contemplation, and perhaps your action. Being alive is constant change.

I always understood the line ("stay hungry, stay foolish") as a call to being aware of oneself, being curious of one's own peculiar being and wants, being aware of one's surroundings and of one's capacity to say/make something out of this existence.
by LoganDark | 2026-02-11 10:16:39+00:00
> I typed "Zulip docker compose" into DuckDuckGo, the first result was https://github.com/zulip/docker-zulip which has commits from today, so doesn't seem out-of-date.

Of course, that's where I started as well. However, when I tried to pull as described in the README:

$ docker pull ghcr.io/zulip/zulip-server:11.5-0
Error response from daemon: failed to resolve reference "ghcr.io/zulip/zulip-server:11.5-0": ghcr.io/zulip/zulip-server:11.5-0: not found

So I had to pull from `zulip/docker-zulip` instead, because that one actually does exist.

> Does https://zulip.readthedocs.io/projects/docker/en/latest/how-t... help?

It almost did, but Zulip's port 80 still would try to redirect to HTTPS, even when X-Forwarded-Proto said https.

Today (after I had made the comment you replied to), I tried setting `CONFIG_application_server__http_only: "true"` as should work according to https://github.com/zulip/docker-zulip/blob/add4339a92d3073d5... , but it appears the image I actually have is different, as /sbin/entrypoint.sh reads:

if [ "$DISABLE_HTTPS" == "True" ]; then
echo "Disabling https in nginx."
crudini --set /etc/zulip/zulip.conf application_server http_only true
fi

So I set DISABLE_HTTPS instead and that worked. It appears this has been removed according to https://github.com/zulip/docker-zulip/blob/add4339a92d3073d5... first committed two days ago, but that change seemingly hasn't reached the image I'm using? Either way I wasn't even upgrading so how would I find those docs?

> The official docker compose has databases set up already, I guess you were missing those from your ChatGPT created compose file.

I didn't even know how / to use the official docker compose because I didn't find documentation that explained what to do. I didn't see information in the repository on what to do and assumed its compose files were for development/testing.

> A quick click-through seems to suggest you landed on https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/stable/production/install.ht... and then clicked on the prominent "Docker image" link on top which leads to a random location on the page. (at least on Firefox)

Using Safari; for me it leads to the "Zulip in Docker" section on the "Deployment options" page. It says only that the Docker image exists, and that using it increases the effort required (obviously). I followed the link to the Docker image and only read the README because that's usually where installation instructions are. I found none. At the bottom it says "See our main documentation" which I didn't follow because I thought it was just a link to Zulip's documentation which I had already established was near useless. Following it now, apparently it's Docker-unique documentation. Would've been helpful to have known that or for it even to have been indicated anywhere. But some of it still doesn't apply to the image I'm using since the ghcr.io one seemingly disappeared for some reason.
by imtringued | 2026-02-11 10:17:04+00:00
Video games are entertainment. In the old days you inserted a cartridge or optical disc into a physical device. You play the game, finish it and then move on. They are always self contained experiences with a custom UI independent of the OS.

In the best case, explicit Linux support does not affect the experience in a positive or negative way. In the worst case, explicit Linux support means the game can't be played anymore.
by jalapenos | 2026-02-11 10:18:29+00:00
Am I taking crazy pills, or did we not literally just have a global pandemic that forced all developers to work from home for over a year, and literally there was no problem?

Is it actually possible that it has occurred to no-one to just hire them without asking they move their physical bodies into the US? Or if TZ is such a biggie, get them a visa to literally anywhere within the Americas?
by keepamovin | 2026-02-11 10:19:38+00:00
Oh it's an encrypted at rest notepad. The idea was to apply NIST 800-53 and FIPS 140-3 to the smallest possible app where a selection of controls could make sense.

It only uses OpenSSL-FIPS variant on Linux for the crypt. On Macos and Windows, it uses OS FIPS primitives for it.
by ErroneousBosh | 2026-02-11 10:19:39+00:00
For a few weeks I ran a MUD over AX.25 for a couple of my friends.

Because on their own, MUDs aren't nerdy enough, amateur radio isn't nerdy enough, and indeed packet radio isn't nerdy enough.

Eventually we decided we'd had our fun and now I needed to the TNC for something else.
by taysco | 2026-02-11 10:20:04+00:00
lol, we also did that. And we a Cyrix chip so our computer was pretty slow (but fast for the time) and you had to shut down absolutely everything, even the screensaver, that damn thing coming on is probably responsible for at least 100 coasters haha. Any sort of PC stutter and you were presented with that damn buffer underrun error message.

I was like 12 or 13 and wanted to install linux, like slackware 2.0 or some shit lol. But I didn't know about iso's, just FTP. So I was trying to download every single file from a unpacked linux distro on a ftp site with a 14.4k modem. Then I'd burn them and try to install. I think it took me nearly 500 cds before I got a working install. The install would get like 60% and die on some corrupt package/file, I'd redownload that file, burn it again, run the install... 61% crash, repeat... I did get that sucker installed though. insanity lmao
by ckardaris | 2026-02-11 10:21:17+00:00
I don't think the article proposes that a community should not accept new members. On the contrary, it critiques the breaking of communities.

Migrants or refugees have to find a new community because their old one was broken for whatever reason, be it war, financial troubles or something else. So in that case, that first breakage of community should have been prevented and the community preserved.
by lenkite | 2026-02-11 10:21:38+00:00
> Because I believe it can be supported and be shown to be objectively correct.

Out of curiosity, How can your argument "be supported and shown to be objectively correct" ?

It seems the evidence is actually the other way around. After introduction of the death penalty in the 90s, the average net amount of opium trafficked to Singapore famously dropped by ~70%.

I do not support the death penalty myself, but primarily for ethical and moral reasons to preserve our humanity - which is constantly under attack. But not "objective ones" since the evidence clearly supports the death penalty for "objective reasons". For these positions, objectivity should be left in the gutter.
by Juliate | 2026-02-11 10:22:15+00:00
I guess so, but they still seem confused:

> Job's level of success. We never hear about them.

Success != hearing about it.

You don't hear or know about most people success, or failure, for that matter; even huge ones. You know about a very small subset of these. That's fame.

And I'm just not sure that "being a found of a billion+ dollar company" was what Jobs considered his own success; but a consequence or aside part of it. Actually, no one knows but him.
by sublinear | 2026-02-11 10:22:45+00:00
Complexity is not where the value to the business comes from. In fact, it's usually the opposite. Nobody wants to maintain slop, and whenever you dismiss simplicity you ignore all the heroic hard work done by those at the lower level of indirection. This is what politics looks like when it finally places its dirty hands on the tech industry, and it's probably been a long time coming.

As annoying as that is, we should celebrate a little that the people who understand all this most deeply are gaining real power now.

Yes, AI can write code (poorly), but the AI hype is now becoming pure hate against the people who sit in meetings quietly gathering their thoughts and distilling it down to the simple and almost poetic solutions nobody else but those who do the heads down work actually care about.

> A huge fraction of the software economy runs on CRUD and some business logic.

You vastly underestimate the meaning of CRUD applied in such a direct manner. You're right in some sense that "we have the technology", but we've had this technology for a very long time now. The business logic is pure gold. You dismiss this not realizing how many other thriving and well established industries operate doing simple things applied precisely.

Some Ella Fitzgerald for you:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tq572nNpZcw
by backscratches | 2026-02-11 10:23:00+00:00
Anonymity/untraceability was not the primary reason for using BTC towards black/grey markets. Bitcoin can be used pseudo anonymously , and the fact is you simply cannot send money to your grey market counterparty via any method but cash without it being flagged/canceled, and if you can't send cash (which has its own problems), bitcoin is the only option.
by avianlyric | 2026-02-11 10:23:35+00:00
> Because mastercard/visa don't personally bear any risk they are very happy to process refunds and chargebacks in the customer's favor.

That’s not how chargebacks and refunds work. Mastercard and Visa are not involved in the vast majority of disputes at all, it’s entirely handled by the card issuer and card acquirer. Mastercard/Visa only get involved in cases where network party has broken one of the technical rules of the network. For cases of missing or faulty goods etc, Mastercard/Visa do nothing except transport the messages used by bank/merchant to litigate the dispute.

When Mastercard/Visa are forced to step in and make an arbitration decision, they charge a hefty fee (hundreds of dollars) to the losing side to do so. So they have no issue with people raising disputes, it makes them a lot of money.

> Amex can see what I purchase but knows very little about me otherwise. I like this separation, and I like that it's hard for the government to get a complete picture of my financial affairs.

This is naive, all banks and credit card issuers are required by law to perform KYC (Know Your Customer) to ensure they know exactly who they’re transacting with. It’s trivial for the state to buildup a complete image of your financial situation by sending a small number of court orders to banks and financial entities to turn over all their records on you. That’s ignoring the automated tax reporting that banks also have to do.
by lelanthran | 2026-02-11 10:23:36+00:00
I agree with everything in this comment - FWIW, I was on the standards bodies in my country in 2008/2009 to establish a national standard for word processing documents.

We debated the OOXML spec in as much detail as time allowed, but we still didn't get through the entire behemoth of a thing.

ISTR that Microsoft representatives were also on the same subcommittee, and, but the MS rep was pushing very hard indeed to standardise on OOXML.

Too bad the OOXML format, itself, has MS-proprietary binary blobs built into the specification as part of the format.

ISTR we submitted a recommendation of standardising on ODF.
by donkeybeer | 2026-02-11 10:23:43+00:00
They have issued orders about banning drones around ICE agents, so it's possible the terrorist agency ICE are building a base there. ICE have been given a massive funding boost so it has to go somewhere. Or its the works for some kind of military invasion of Cuba or Mexico.

Idk what the topography of the place is. If possible someone should put a telescope there and see what's up.
Show HN: Seedance.fast – Early Access to ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 via Volcengine
by thenextechtrade | 2026-02-11 10:24:00+00:00
I’ve been coordinating with the ByteDance team and just got Seedance 2.0 running via their official cloud services (Volcengine). To be honest, the results are stunning—the physics and temporal consistency are a significant leap over previous models.

I built seedance.fast as a streamlined interface to expose these capabilities. The model is about to be officially released, but the site is already integrated and ready for the traffic. I'm focusing on low-latency inference to make the "text-to-video" workflow actually usable for creators.

Happy to answer questions about the model's performance compared to the private betas of other leading video AIs.

I’ll be continuously streaming the Seedance 2.0 videos I generate onto my site as a live video feed. You’re welcome to follow along and get early access.

I’m also offering an option to pre-purchase and lock in access to Seedance 2.0 now. Since the operating costs for 2.0 are expected to be significantly higher, pricing will increase later. Early supporters can secure access to Seedance 2.0 at the current Seedance 1.0 pricing.

If you’re interested in experimenting early and locking in a lower rate before the price adjustment, you can join now.

website:https://seedance.fast
by insin | 2026-02-11 10:24:24+00:00
10x is doing a year's work in ~5 weeks

No shot

I'm seeing that some tickets are "finished" (i.e. ready for PR) more quickly, but they end up needing so many changes and to be re-reviewed so many times it takes longer than it ever did because someone is saying yes to the LLM instead of designing software. When it's clear your review comments are just going back into the maw of the LLM, I've given up trying to guide and now just outright suggest actually workable designs (taking more of my time too), and that merely cuts down the number of times it will come back for review again.
by autoexec | 2026-02-11 10:26:52+00:00
However fast they "think" the LLM doesn't understand a single word of anything they output. While marketing is calling them "agents" they don't actually have agency.

I'll be impressed when an LLM decides on its own to create a social media site for bots entirely unprompted, or when it is prompted to make a racist social media post and refuses, not because of some keyword blacklist safety feature programed into it by humans and triggered by human supplied prompting, but because it actually knows that doing so would be wrong.

Until LLMs develop any level of understanding or agency, which doesn't look likely to happen, there's no risk of them overthrowing humans or doing literally anything else unless a human tells them to do it. Even then they'll fuck it up a bunch of the time and need humans to clean up their mess.

This isn't to say that LLMs can't be incredibly consequential for the economy, or be useful to humans, or be harmful to them, but in any case it won't be because of something the AI did, it'll be because of the choices and actions of the humans directing the AI.
by reedf1 | 2026-02-11 10:27:15+00:00
'Calculating' an integral, is usually done by applying a series of sort of abstract mathematical tricks. There is usually no deeper meaning applied to the solving. If you have profound intuition you can guess the solution to an integral, by 'inspection'.

What part here is the knowing or understanding? Does solving an integral symbolically provide more knowledge than numerically or otherwise?

Understanding the underlying functions themselves and the areas they sweep; has substitution or by-parts, actually provided you with this?
by em-bee | 2026-02-11 10:28:22+00:00
yes. it is possible that i can get a real credit limit too, but i didn't check.

these debit like credit cards put a different light on the statistics. as some people here have said, europeans don't use creditcards, and then someone contradicted that with a statistic of how much is paid with credit cards. how much of those credit card payments are made with debit like cards like mine?

europe doesn't want their people to get into credit debt. possibly protection for people is stronger and makes it harder for banks to recover if people fail to pay? but most likely countries just want people to be able to protect themselves from overspending.

like i can get an overdraw limit on my bank account. it is set to a default value based on my income. but i deliberately reset that to zero. i don't want an overdraw limit. if i really need to overdraw i'll change the limit at that time and i think i can even set that it is valid only for a short time and then it resets automatically.
by dlcarrier | 2026-02-11 10:28:25+00:00
Don't they use the same IEC 62196 ports as other EVs, outside the US?

They made their own in the US, because the standard SAE J1772 combo port is an unweildy behemoth, then they released the patent into public domain, and the rest of the automotive industry adopted their port into the NACS port, which beats both IEC 62196 and SAE J1772 in available power, all in a much smaller and easier-to-use connector.
by AdamN | 2026-02-11 10:28:59+00:00
If true they would have told the Russians and the Chinese and yes everybody will know after the fact. But for various reasons they might not want to disclose ahead of time in case Trump gets talked out of it or they realize they're not ready or various other reasons (perhaps the Energy Dept. doesn't actually want to do it but they're going forward step by step hoping it gets halted).
by jahnu | 2026-02-11 10:29:05+00:00
Wow I didn't see that. Usually it's forbidden in the terms of agreement between the merchant and the payment processor to add a surcharge for using the card so everyone else ends up subsidising it.

Vienna/Austria is such a strange place wrt payment right now. Some places are cashless, many are cash only, many are card only above a certain amount. I had one lady running a ramen restaurant accept instant SEPA.

And it's going to be interesting tax wise when they remove the requirement for receipts on transactions under 35 EUR.
by Etheryte | 2026-02-11 10:29:28+00:00
This shows a fundamental understanding about the market you're commenting on. The European market is nothing like the US market. The vast majority of transfers are already debit based. Most people have a credit card, but for most part it's not a daily driver. Many European countries don't have credit scores at all, and in the ones that do, it isn't nearly as important as in the US. Since there isn't much of a practical need to take on debt, most people don't do it (leaving aside mortgages and leases, but you don't take those on a credit card anyway).
by energy123 | 2026-02-11 10:29:48+00:00
You can tell the difference by observing that, intra-city (not inter-city, inter-state, or inter-country, which introduces confounds), the suburban locations with the highest land values build the least. Enclaves like where Marc Andreessen lives, where his family unit has been involved in successful NIMBY activism. That is an outcome that can only be explained by asymmetric government interference due to more effective lobbying from politically active NIMBYs.