MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by Kaks7302 | 2026-02-22 18:17:29+00:00
After months of development and 1 full month of live personal testing, I’m excited to share something powerful.

I’ve built an AI-driven system that:

Scans multiple USDT futures trading pairs in real time
Connects directly to trading platform APIs
Analyzes market structure, momentum & volatility
Filters high-probability setups
Delivers signals instantly via Telegram

This isn’t hype.
This is data-driven analysis combined with disciplined risk management.

For the past month, I’ve personally tested it — refining entries, exits, and SL logic. The results have been consistent and promising, and I’m now working on perfecting it further.

If you're serious about futures trading and want to test intelligent, AI-powered signals as we optimize and scale — this is your opportunity to be early.

DM me if you’d like to try the signals and be part of the refinement phase.

The future of trading is automation + discipline.
Let’s build it properly.
by remarkEon | 2026-02-22 18:19:36+00:00
I think the reasons are a little more complex. The geography and history dimensions are plainly and obviously different, but criticizing Iran is wrapped up in layers of criticism of political Islam, which is harder to do for the people who tend to prioritize the plight of Palestinians. The Islamic Republic of Iran is the logical end state of the governing ideology of Hamas, and it's probably just easier to ignore the inconsistencies here than to emphasize with what's going on in Tehran right now.
by reliabilityguy | 2026-02-22 18:19:40+00:00
> Based on independent journalists in Iran, the protests were related to economic problems.

This was true in the beginning. Now every protest chants “Javid Shah”, “death to Khamenei”, etc, which are political chants.

> And they have an Apartheid system.

The only apartheid system that allows the minority they discriminate against to achieve highest positions as judges, academics, celebrities, etc.

> And they are actively depopulating the original population.

This is not true. You can simply check how number of Arabs grew, and in many cases, outpaced in their growth the Jewish population.
by graemep | 2026-02-22 18:19:55+00:00
> If you've already got the electricity for electrolysis, would it not be more efficient and mechanically simpler to store it in a battery and power an electric motor?

The Mirai uses the hydrogen in a fuel cell so it is an EV: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Mirai

It looks like a reasonable idea, but it needs infrastructure.
by oblio | 2026-02-22 18:20:14+00:00
> This is a super helpful and productive comment. I look forward to a blog post describing your process in more detail.

The average commenter doesn't write this kind of comment. Usually it's just a "can you expand/elaborate?". Extra politeness is kind of a hallmark of LLMs.

And if you look at the very neat comment it's responding to, there's a chance it's actually the opposite type, an actual human being sarcastic.

I can't tell anymore.

Edit: I've checked the comment history and it's just a regular ole human doing research :-)
by Aachen | 2026-02-22 18:20:21+00:00
I am constructing my own. Examples are drawn from books, group chats, podcasts, and other media that I consume in the target language (so I know those are either correct, or at worst, as wrong as native speakers are which is good enough for me), shortened as necessary to make it appropriate for Anki

Then I gave my first 100 cards to a native speaker and somehow it's still full of subtle issues and not infrequently also actual mistakes >.<

The two dozen decks I've downloaded aren't always perfect either, but making your own doesn't guarantee it'll be better than another uploader's honest attempt at making a good deck. I do wish Ankiweb was more collaborative though, at least having a bugtracker where people can report mistakes and additions, if not full on code forge functionality. If I'm not mistaken, all you can currently do is leave a review
by frehu | 2026-02-22 18:20:31+00:00
File explorer with a twist - instead of 5000 files of which you need to see 20, shows pending changes + files modified within a time window (pending, 3 days, 7 days, 30 days, etc.) pulled from Git history. This way you don't get lost browsing everything or lose track of your work immediately after a commit.

Beyond the core concept, there's also

- A heatmap that colors files based on recency

- Deleted files appear in the tree where they used to be

- A pinned section for files that are not recent but handy

- File history, diff search (pickaxe) and git log -L line/function history available from editor context menu

- File grouping based on the moon phase during the most recent commit (good luck finding alternative software for this)
by LolWolf | 2026-02-22 18:20:48+00:00
> True, but with such numbers you will normally not do anything else except computing an approximate value of them.

That's what I think people do with other numbers like "pi" at the end of the day, no? :)

> That is what I meant by "interesting", i.e. the necessity of using symbols of such numbers, obviously for use in symbolic computations, since in numeric computations you would never use the actual numbers, but only some approximations of them.

It's very much an encoding problem, I think. Though we probably, on aggregate, use "unnamed computable numbers" implicitly on the order of as much as we use "named computable numbers" the former just has way more of a "tail" of uses where the "encoding of the symbol" is, e.g., "here's the PDE you use to compute this number"!

(It gets a little weird since we're kind of not distinguishing between the approximation that can be used to construct said numbers to arbitrary precision vs the specific program instance that constructs one specific approximation, but the idea is mostly there.)
by kop316 | 2026-02-22 18:21:06+00:00
Ohh neat! A generalized version of this was the topic of my PhD dissertation:

https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/thesis/Modern_Gate_Array_De...

And they are likely doing something similar to put their LLMs in silicon. I would believe a 10x electricity boost along with it being much faster.

The idea is that you can create a sea of generalized standard cells and it makes for a gate array at the manufacturing layer. This was also done 20 or so years ago, it was called a "structured ASIC".

I'd be curious to see if they use the LUT design of traditional structured ASICs or figured what what I did: you can use standard cells to do the same thing and use regular tools/PDKs to make it.
by martin-t | 2026-02-22 18:21:22+00:00
Why would you want to, unless you live in a domain of indoctrination ("echo chamber") that pacifism is good and anything else is bad?

I always find it useful to ask "why", whenever someone tells me their beliefs. Children do it and adults sometimes tend to find it annoying because they realize they cannot justify their beliefs but being children, they are easy to dismiss. Harder to dismiss an honest question from an adult.
by verdverm | 2026-02-22 18:22:20+00:00
Multiple apps are running their own PDS, new users to their app go there by default, but it is app by app.

I believe every bsky mobile app is likely pointed at a single app view, but there's no reason they cannot offer a setting, which now after typing that, maybe I do recall someone saying they did that with their app.

There are dozens of Bluesky apps now, some even have highly requested features. I't part of the beauty of ATProto, anyone can build a client for any one (or more) app views. There are alternative ways, eg. use Slices for queries, write directly to PDS, no app view needed for any app in the atmosphere.

It really feels like folks are trying to find a single whole they can poke and claim some win. Time continues to flow, the atmosphere continues to grow, and if you get tuned in and join us, Oh The Places You'll Go!
by sarchertech | 2026-02-22 18:22:44+00:00
All those things are true, but there are a few things to add to it.

They are much much better at writing plausible looking code or providing plausible sounding answers that look correct but aren’t than any junior developer. They are much better at writing subtle bugs that won’t show up for days and will take hours to debug than any junior developer is.

You can’t mentor them into being a senior developer.
by abustamam | 2026-02-22 18:23:00+00:00
This is good insight, and I think honestly a sign of a poorly managed team (not an attack on you). If devs are submitting poor quality work, with or without LLM, they should be given feedback and let go if it keeps happening. It wastes other devs' time. If there is a knowledge gap, they should be proactive in trying to fill that gap, again with or without AI, not trying to build stuff they don't understand.

In my experience, LLMs are an accelerator; it merely exacerbates what already exists. If the team has poor management or codebase has poor quality code, then LLMs just make it worse. If the team has good management and communication and the codebase is well documented and has solid patterns already (again, with or without llm), then LLMs compound that. It may still take some tweaking to make it better, but less chance of slop.
by malfist | 2026-02-22 18:23:07+00:00
You say that, the the psychology today deliberately does not link to the study. It links to several studies but not the one they're writing about. The most they identify it as is a 2002 Times/CNN survey.

If you have the actual study please share it. Right now, I doubt the veracity of psychology today's claims.

In fact I've done more digging since posting this and the only other people talking about this survey is citing psychology today as their source. I can find no primary sources.
by frumu | 2026-02-22 18:23:28+00:00
I ran into Cloudflare’s Markdown for Agents and thought it was exactly what I needed for LLM web research. Then I realized it only helps when a site is on Cloudflare and has it enabled, so it doesn’t solve “open web” extraction.

I built a simple HTML→Markdown pipeline in Rust that works on any public URL (strip scripts/styles/boilerplate, preserve structure + links). On a 100-URL set it reduced input size by ~70–80% (often close to 80%).

Benchmark on the same 100 URLs:

Rust server mode: p50 ~0.4s, p95 ~1.3s, memory ~100MB stable

Node baseline (JSDOM + Turndown): p50 ~1.2s, p95 ~50s, memory grew into hundreds of MB to GBs

Scripts + methodology are in the repo: <link>

Curious what others use for boilerplate removal and how you keep p95 tails under control when parsing nasty pages.
by BadBadJellyBean | 2026-02-22 18:23:53+00:00
Isn't the point that it is as simple and convenient as normal gasoline and also that you can use your gasoline car? If you are using gases it is a hassle for everyone and you need a new car or a full retrofit. At some point we have to ask ourself why we would even do that. Is it really worth it compared to just using a battery?
by leptons | 2026-02-22 18:24:26+00:00
>Remember that Google sat on their AI tech before being forced to productize it by OpenAI.

Google knew this tech wasn't ready for prime-time, they already had plenty of revenue and didn't need to release shoddy shit, but were forced to roll out "AI" even with "hallucinations" and the resulting liabilities to keep up with the new hotness. The tech is still so shoddy, I can't believe people use it for anything beyond a curiosity.
by ck45 | 2026-02-22 18:24:29+00:00
Why does Deutsche Bank pop up in every shady financial deal? Cum Ex, business with Russia, Epstein, some shady deals with his Wingman Trump, and many more. Billions paid in fines, penalties, and settlements. How rotten can an institution be?

Edit: dw covers it: https://www.dw.com/en/deutsche-banks-biggest-scandals/a-5497...
by selridge | 2026-02-22 18:24:29+00:00
I mean the article is pretty short. And what it implies presents itself in the subtitle! It opens with a "fact" (a link to the author's own tweet) which says:

"The state of coding agents can be summed up by this anecdote:

Claude spent $20k on an agent swarm implementing (kinda) a C-compiler in Rust, but desktop Claude is an Electron app."

We haven't made it 100 words in and we already have the core claim. In case we missed it, the author puts it in an inset later:

>So why are we still using Electron and not embracing the agent-powered, spec driven development future?

We get to the end where the author says:

"For now, Electron still makes sense. Coding agents are amazing. But the last mile of dev and the support surface area remains a real concern."

That's both true and and misleading. It's misleading because we can all agree with this sober-minded concluding statement and forget it's just based on "Electron bad, native good". The real logical sequence the author needs us to follow is:

Anthropic said code is free now. > Native code is harder than that for a cross platform runtime > Anthropic releases an app on a cross-platform runtime > code must not be free.

That is only true iff there's absolutely no other design tradeoff! Did they pick electron because robots are bad at the last mile? Maybe. It's pretty dubious, given the MANY MANY other people who made electron apps before AI could code. It's also not at all clear "native good, electron bad" is true at all. It reminds me STRONGLY of "jQuery bad / native good" which was also groundless.
by Aurornis | 2026-02-22 18:24:33+00:00
The vulnerability was in their backend cloud structure. The backend wasn't restricting access to only devices associated with your account.

> Out of sheer laziness, I connected to the Mysa MQTT server and subscribed to the match-everything wildcard topic, #. I was hoping I’d see messages from a few more MQTT topics, giving me more information about my Mysa devices.

> Instead, I started receiving a torrent of messages from every single Internet-connected production Mysa device in the whole world.

The devices had unique IDs, but they were all connected to one big MQTT pub/sub system that didn't even try to isolate anything.

It's lazy backend development. This happens often in IoT products where they hire some consultant or agency to develop a proof of concept, the agency makes a prototype without any security considerations, and then they call it done because it looks like it works. To an uninformed tester who only looks at the app it appears secure because they had to type in their password.
by mapontosevenths | 2026-02-22 18:24:45+00:00
You are literally wrong about almost everything you've just said and have been for many years.[0]

There's a great video on Youtube from Technology Connections on youtube if that's more your speed. He talks a bit about how you're being lied to about it regularly and explains the technology a bit.[1] You really should watch it as he explicitly addresses each of your issues here including "what about the batteries."

Solar is literally, and provabley, cheaper than gas. Including the cost of batteries, which are recyclable. That's why something like 96% of investment in new energy is in solar or wind now. It's not activists, it's literally the cheapest way to do it now.

> over ten years ago.

There's your problem. The cost has been coming down by over 90% per year for the last decade. It WAS more expensive, a decade ago. The fundamentals HAVE changed. The panels ARE almost free, and the amount of steel and concrete are negligible.

[0] https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/un-energy-transiti...

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM
by arpit077 | 2026-02-22 18:24:46+00:00
Hey HN, I've been building 3DIMLI since June 2024. The problem: if you sell digital products (3D models, eBooks, audio, graphics, AI models), your options are either marketplaces that bury your brand and take a cut, or tools like Gumroad where it still feels like someone else's store.

3DIMLI lets you build your own branded storefront with no code. You connect your own Stripe, PayPal, or Razorpay account and payments go directly to you. We never touch your money and take zero commission.

Some things that make it different: per-license pricing (set fixed, flexible, or free tiers per product), video thumbnails with autoplay from YouTube/Vimeo, direct buyer chat via WhatsApp or Telegram, custom store branding with banners and gradients, and a buyer-side feature where customers can request custom products from sellers.

Still in beta (v2.0.2), currently free to use. 56 stores and 290 products on the platform so far.

Would love to hear what's missing, what would make you consider switching from your current setup, and where it falls short. Happy to answer anything.
by martin-t | 2026-02-22 18:25:30+00:00
That's a good way to think about it but unfortunately, human language is so imprecise that IMO many people will leave with the conclusion that "sadly" means "using violence makes me sad and implicitly is therefore bad".

Ideally we'd live in a society where laws are a complete and consistent description of a valid (also complete and consistent) moral system. That's not the reality.

(If it's possible at all because morality operates on reality while legality operated on provability - a subset of reality which can be proven to a neutral third party.)
by thenthenthen | 2026-02-22 18:26:08+00:00
Good question. It sounds like post-humanism, which, even in like left art circles was considered ‘interesting’ ten years ago (like post-antroposcene). These are not very useful terms so appreciate the nuance of ‘less valuable human’. It is not so catchy though, maybe we need to dig deeper. I am sure this has been discussed before.
by Liftyee | 2026-02-22 18:27:56+00:00
It frightens me no more than the possibility of building a flawed airplane or a computer that overheats (looking at you, NVIDIA 12-pin) and "never being able to update the HW". Product recalls and redesigns exist for a reason.

If this happens, womp womp, recall the misaligned LLMs and learn from the mistake. It's part of running a hardware business as opposed to a software one.

I can't imagine they'd go for a full production run before at least testing a couple chips and finding issues.
by kokhanserhii | 2026-02-22 18:28:23+00:00
I read this article when you corrected the link.

I have some solidarity with the author's conclusions and doubts in this article, but he substantiates them with very questionable arguments. That is, he presents not some research, but simply one example where nuances are very important.

HOW did they ask about the plausibility of the tennis video, such that the tennis player said it's not people? Here there's a very big difference - either he would simply be watching tennis and say this, or they asked him "Is this a real game or did artificial intelligence draw it?" This is not some significant research (antiplacebo).

And about the architecture of artificial intelligence systems, the author judges by some very popular-science simplified models. But real models are of course unknown to the general public and are corporate secrets.

The fact that one tennis player pointed to the unrealism of the video doesn't mean he would be able to explain in an artificial intelligence system how to make a realistic video.
by cmrdporcupine | 2026-02-22 18:28:39+00:00
Reading it vs hearing is deceiving. The orthography shifted markedly after the Norman invasion when French speaking elites imposed a continental Romance / French language spelling system over top of the ordinary people's Germanic language. In actual spoken language there was likely far more continuity, we just don't have good records of it because the ruling elite was disdainful of English and used French at the court.

So someone who is a modern German or Dutch speaker will have an easier time reading Anglo-Saxon than an English speaker, perhaps. But that's a bit deceiving. Many of the sounds written there had a very different spoken sound than their modern German or Dutch counterparts, and are actually closer to their modern English variants. (ge in particular pronounced "ye" not hard-g, so words like yesterday were spelled with "gest" similar to modern German, but not spoken that way at all).

Simon Roper on YouTube does a better job of this recently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=842OX2_vCic
by Aurornis | 2026-02-22 18:29:22+00:00
That is very refreshing.

Many geek hobbies like 3D printing and home automation are becoming full of unnecessarily smug evangelization if you're not using hivemind approved software and tools, even if it requires a lot more work to do.

It's nice to a see a project encourage their userbase to be realistic about what it is and refrain from trying to force it on everyone as the only acceptable way to use a robot vaccuum.
Show HN: Mujoco React
by noahwardlow | 2026-02-22 18:29:37+00:00
MuJoCo physics simulation in the browser using React.

This is made possible by DeepMind's mujoco-wasm (mujoco-js), which compiles MuJoCo to WebAssembly. We wrap it with React Three Fiber so you can load any MuJoCo model, step physics, and write controllers as React components, all running client-side in the browser
by e-khadem | 2026-02-22 18:30:15+00:00
[citation needed]. Not really though, you're just spewing the regime's propaganda. You might as well directly quote Khamenei on this one. I'm really restraining myself by not swearing at this comment.

Have you seen a dead body in your life? Have you seen a street stained with blood being washed with high pressure water? Have you seen parts of the brain of a fellow citizen on the sidewalk, the same guy who was standing next to you 30 seconds ago? 36'000 people were killed in just two nights. It was like 5 battles of D-Day, but in a shorter amount of time.

And you are conveniently forgetting the fact that most of the people came out when Reza Pahlavi requested a mass protest.

And then you portray it as if the people had no agency in this, they didn't know that 1500 were killed in the 2019 protests. And a similar number in 2022-2023 over Mahsa Amini, for protesting the actions of the "ethics police" killing a young girl over a few strands of her hair.

In the end, everyone is responsible for this other than the actual tyrants running the régime and the blood thirsty mullahs doing the actual killing.
by accounting2026 | 2026-02-22 18:30:33+00:00
I didn't read/hear it as reducing human life to 'training energy', but I don't like the comparison at the technical level.

Firstly, the math isn't even close. A human being consumes maybe 15 MWh of food energy from years 0 to 20. Modern frontier models take on the order of 100,000 MWh to train. It's a 10,000x difference. Furthermore, the human is actively doing 'inference' (living, acting, producing) during those 20 years of training and is also doings lots of non-brain stuff.
Besides the energy math, it's comparing apples-to-oranges. A human brain doesn't start out as a blank slate; it has billions of years of evolutionary priors for language and spatial reasoning that LLMs have to teach themselves from scratch, so this could explain why a human can do some things cheaper. Also, the learning material available to a human is inherently created to be easily ingested by a human brain, whereas a blank LLM needs to build the capacity to process that data.
Altman seems to hint at a comparison to the whole human evolution, but that seems unfair in the other direction, because humans and human evolution had to make discoveries from scratch and trial and error whereas LLMs get to ingest the final "good stuff". But either way you slice it, it's just not a good comparison, though not an 'inhuman' or immoral one.
by kibwen | 2026-02-22 18:30:43+00:00
> To see the point try to wrap overflows on arithmetic functions.

The invariant is less obvious, but you could still do this if you really wanted. The observation is that addition of two fixed-size nonnegative integers cannot overflow unless at least one is greater than half the range. So your `non_overflowing_addition` function would need take two inputs of type `NonNegativeLessThanHalfMaxValue`, where the constructor for the latter type enforces the invariant. Multiplication is similar, but with the square root of the range (and I suppose `NonNegativeLessThanSqrtMaxValue` could be a subtype of `NonNegativeLessThanHalfMaxValue` if you want to be fancy).