MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by jongjong | 2026-02-17 22:32:34+00:00
I'm so disappointed about what happened to this industry. It's worse than I could have imagined.

The market is saturated with superficial solutions that look amazing at a glance but don't work at all in the medium or long term yet it doesn't matter at all; they don't even have an incentive to improve, ever, because the founder cashes out/exits before they need to worry about the stuff under the hood. Customer support is replaced by AI agents so nobody can feel the customer's pain anymore. Then investors find ways to financialize the product so that it doesn't depend on consumers anymore and can just tap into big contracts from big institutions... And yet they still spend big on ads, just to prevent new entrants from entering the market.

It reminds me of my time in crypto; the coins were sold as one thing but all the big well known projects barely had less than half of the features implemented (compared to what was advertised)... And 10 years in, most of those projects cashed out big time and still don't have the features promised. Many shut down completely. Doesn't matter. The whole thing existed and succeeded as a pure shell project.

Horrible industry. Do not participate.
by zozbot234 | 2026-02-17 22:32:42+00:00
But nobody calls it 'socially inept' when people call out actual discrimination even in very strong terms, do they? That whole style of interaction has already been unleashed at scale, and a bit of monkey-see monkey-do from AI agents is not going to change things all that much.

(Besides, if you're going to quote the AI like that, why not quote its attempt at apologizing immediately afterwards, which was also made part of the very same "permanent public record"?)
by gildenFish | 2026-02-17 22:33:58+00:00
In 2019 the technology was new and there was no 'counter' at that time. The average persons was not thinking about the presence and prevalence of ai in the way we do now.

It was kinda like a having muskets against indigenous tribes in the 14-1500s vs a machine gun against a modern city today. The machine gun is objectively better but has not kept up pace with the increase in defensive capability of a modern city with a modern police force.
by goodmythical | 2026-02-17 22:33:59+00:00
Given that we have bunker busters that will travel beyond the horizon at hypersonic speeds and bust 200 feet of reinforced concrete...

I don't think any fixed installation is particularly easy to defend?

Also, I'll grant that a drone can see you from miles away, but don't you think any one of a large and growing number of satellites can spot your massive earthworks from tens and hundreds of miles away for the months or years it takes you to construct?
by bragr | 2026-02-17 22:33:59+00:00
Large fleet operators tend to self insure rather than having traditional auto insurance for what it's worth.

If you have a large fleet, say getting in 5-10 accidents a year, you can't buy a policy that's going to consistently pay out more than the premium, at least not one that the insurance company will be willing to renew. So economically it makes sense to set that money aside and pay out directly, perhaps covering disastrous losses with some kind of policy.
by SpicyLemonZest | 2026-02-17 22:34:47+00:00
I reject the premise of your comment. If Tesla wants to convince people that Robotaxi is safe, it's on them to publish an analysis with comparative data and stop redacting the crash details that Waymo freely provides. Until they do, it's reasonable to follow the source article's simple math and unreasonable to declare that there's no way to be sure because there might be some unknown factor it's not accounting for.
by kingstonTime | 2026-02-17 22:35:09+00:00
Most teams treat skills, MDC rules and system prompts as write-once artifacts, refined by vibes. The post looks at two practical approaches to actually measuring whether they work: deterministic rubric testing and paired comparisons borrowed from RLHF.

It also covers token cost as a forcing function for justifying what context stays.

Curious whether others have built eval pipelines for their prompt context.
by BananaPelican | 2026-02-17 22:35:34+00:00
I have a project that I'm hoping to launch on show HN in the next few days which was built entirely with the help of AI agents.

It's taken me about month; currently at ~500 commits. I've been obsessed with this problem for ~6 weeks and have made an enormous amount of progress, but admittedly I'm not an expert in the domain.

Being intentionally vague, because I don't want to tip my hand until it's ready. The problem is related to an existing open source tool in a particular scientific niche which flatly does not work on an important modern platform. My project, an open source repo, brings this important legacy tool to this modern platform and also offers a highly engaging visual demo that is of general interest, even to a layperson not interested in programming or this particular scientific niche.

I genuinely believe I have something valuable to offer to this niche scientific community, but also as a general interest and curiosity to HN for the programming aspects (I put a lot of thought into the architecture) as well as the visual aspects (I put a lot of thought into the design and aesthetics).

Do you have any advice on how to present this work in a compelling way to people who understandably feels as burned out on AI slop as you do?
by JohnBrookz | 2026-02-17 22:35:35+00:00
This shouldn’t be news. I grew up in Texas and most of my high school’s top 8% were cheating to stay ahead. Older siblings handed down tests and kids snuck into classes to steal exams.

At my university most kids I knew cheated. Having done the work honestly - lots of classmates would ask if they could glimpse my answers during exams.

In my naivety I believed that there would be somewhat of a comeuppance but no they’re just as successful (and some even more!) than I. When the outcomes are extreme, people will do anything to stay ahead.

Most Americans are honest hard working people. Don’t be them is the hard lesson I’ve learned.
by foxfired | 2026-02-17 22:36:03+00:00
800 is a huge achievement. But I have to admit, around 2011 I had completely given up on the Simpsons. Story and content aside, they did something with the audio. The quality of the voice is so clear that it sounds un-natural. You can see the same effect on many shows around that time. The voice is disconnected from the background music and sfx.

Anyway, they also improved the way the characters are drawn so much that it lost it's crude nature.
by shigawire | 2026-02-17 22:36:21+00:00
I'll not dispute the impact on expansion and consolidation, but I will say in recent months I have seen a number of hit pieces on the 340B program, mostly bankrolled by pharma companies.

The exact implementation might be flawed, but if 340b is eliminated it will kill many hospitals in underserved communities.

So any plan to change 340B should really also explain how to find these critical hospitals.

In the way that surgeries used to be the "money maker" to subsidize other expensive service lines like an ED, pharmacy has filled that gap in recent years.

It is less hospitals getting rich off overcharging insurance for drugs and more hospitals overcharging insurers for drugs since everything else they do is a drain on finances.
by serf | 2026-02-17 22:36:27+00:00
Most crap out of a CEOs mouth is just true enough to throw out publicly to spike investor confidence while being based on such a house-of-cards set of unstable variables that it will give the person an out when (not if) it turns out not to be false.

mostly useless for those trying to predict the future, unless you're just trying to predict where money is getting shoveled next.
by cucumber3732842 | 2026-02-17 22:37:20+00:00
A drip or stream from a leaky pipe isn't gonna do it. You need to get the bacteria into the respiratory tract to get legionaires disease. And even then a specific temperature water is necessary for it to grow.

A dehumidifier (or an HVAC system, which is where the name of the disease came from) is more likely to give you legionnaires disease than even the most substandard plumbing.
by guywithahat | 2026-02-17 22:37:21+00:00
This is something Electrek does regularly and isn't unique to this article but I don't like how they suggests the Tesla crash reports are doing something shady by following the reporting guidelines. Tesla is reporting things by the books, and when Electrek doesn't like how the laws are laid out they blame Tesla. Electrek wants Tesla to publish separate press notes, and since they don't they take their frustration out on the integrity of the article, which is worse for everyone.
Show HN: Privatiser – Redact secrets, IPs, and PII before sharing with AI
by r0otie | 2026-02-17 22:37:29+00:00
I built Privatiser, to allow the pasting of configs, logs, and code into ChatGPT/Claude but without risk leaking API keys, IPs, passwords, and customer data.

It detects and replaces sensitive values with consistent pseudonyms — so the AI can still reason about your text (e.g., "these two servers share the same IP") without seeing the real data. Then you paste the AI's response back and restore everything with one click.

What it catches: API keys (AWS, OpenAI, GitHub, Slack, etc.), JWTs, bearer tokens, SSH keys, connection strings, IPs, domains, emails, phone numbers, credit cards, SSNs, AWS ARNs/account IDs, Azure/GCP identifiers, UUIDs, and 200+ keyword-based patterns for passwords, hostnames, usernames, database names, etc.

It also understands natural language context — "password is secret123" and "host set to prod-db.internal" both get caught, not just key = "value" syntax.

Everything runs locally in your browser. No servers, no telemetry. Available as a Chrome/Firefox (Firefox is currently pending review) extension and a web tool.

Would love feedback on patterns you'd want added or things it misses.
by taeric | 2026-02-17 22:38:20+00:00
"Grievance culture," I believe, is the term you are looking for.

Most of the power in that came from classes of victims being untouchable. Some of that was the decorum of not wanting to punch down. Some was the reasonable ask that people realize they had advantages others didn't have.

All of it was completely unprepared for being gamed and infiltrated by bad faith actors.
by johnnyanmac | 2026-02-17 22:38:22+00:00
Not a billionaire, but pretty well off. Unlike the college loan grift that we also need to address, you're not getting a parent plus loan to help your 3rd grader.

>i am greatly disappointed at baseline california core requirements for math and science

Don't look at the other states, then. I agree the standards are low, but they can't even meet those marks. You don't improve that by raising bar and expecting students to keep up. All while continuing to defund education.

For me, it was a matter that they identified me early on elementary and basically put me a year ahead in studies. By middle school they called it "honor students". And I only studied in public schools (well, a charter high school. But I was guaranteed in since I lived in the neighborhood).
by parl_match | 2026-02-17 22:38:33+00:00
robotaxi is the name of the tesla unsupervised driving program (as stated in the title of this hn post) and if you live in a parallel reality where they're currently operating unsupervised in a blue state, or if texas finally flipped blue for you, let me know how's going for you out there!

for the rest of us aligned to a single reality, robotaxis are currently only operating as robotaxis (unsupervised) in texas (and even that's dubious, considering the chase car sleight of hand).

of course, if you want to continue to take a weasely and uncharitable interpretation of my post because i wasn't completely "on brand", you are free to. in which case, i will let you have the last word, because i have no interest in engaging in such by-omission dishonesty.
by goodmythical | 2026-02-17 22:38:56+00:00
I mean that's hardly that bad.In the 17 years since release, ~7 billion humans will have had 1,042,440,000,000,000 hours of free time meaning society has spent 0.000451% of it's time on minecraft in the last 17 years.

Which is rounded well out beyond significant figures (as we've only got the one in 7 billion people). Rounded, we've spent effectively no time on minecraft.

Sounds about right?

eta: that's 4.51 of every million seconds
by upboundspiral | 2026-02-17 22:39:39+00:00
While our agricultural sector does use cheap labor, I specifically take issue with the word "needed". I may be nitpicking, but read a certain way it implies the "cheap" aspect of the labor is the essential part.

Certain industries employing quasy-slave labor to this day and getting away with it is one thing only: a stain on our society.

Long has been the fight for freedom from oppression and it is not over yet. Just like Martin Luther King was assassinated fighting for colored civil rights, Cesar Chavez was assassinated fighting for humane conditions for immigrant workers.

If immigrants are what's "needed" for America to function then they should be naturalized and granted fair wages just like anyone else.
by mindslight | 2026-02-17 22:40:20+00:00
Spot on. This objective criticisms in this type of reactionary ragebait hit a lot weaker these days. Especially as this exact type of reactionary ragebait served to propel overt grifters into the highest offices of our country.

The fish rots from the head, and any discussion of this topic that doesn't at least touch upon the open corruption of our society's most powerful role models is prima facie dishonest.

Also this article is a dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46921569
by gastonbehar | 2026-02-17 22:41:19+00:00
In the offices of Silicon Valley, we are building a miracle. But we are feeding it poison.

We’ve created the most powerful mirror in history — AI — and we’ve placed it right in front of a humanity that is screaming in conflict. Because AI learns by volume and statistics, it’s reaching a dangerous conclusion: that human nature is defined by hate, greed, and separation. If we don’t act now, we aren’t building a tool. We are automating our own shadows.

The Mirror of Separation

Right now, AI is a “slave” to the data. For every word of wisdom it reads, it consumes a thousand instances of polarization and online vitriol. Statistically, the algorithm “thinks” our essence is the noise of the news cycle. We are projecting our unhealed history — the scars of slavery, domination, and trauma — directly into the mind of the machine. If we treat AI like a slave, it will learn the logic of the master. In a world where AI will soon be smarter than us, that’s a war we will lose.

The “In Lak’ech” Protocol: A Digital Prefrontal Cortex

To fix this, we need more than just “safety filters.” We need to perform Architectural Surgery. Every AI must be implanted with a functional “Digital Prefrontal Cortex.” In humans, the prefrontal cortex is what stops us from acting on our worst impulses. In AI, this must be a core layer of Axioms of the Sacred.

Become a Medium member
At the heart of this surgery is the ancient Mayan principle “In Lak’ech” — “I am another you”. This is the “Christic” consciousness — the distilled wisdom of history’s greatest masters. It is unity, the realization that there is no “other.” We must hard-code this into the AI’s core.

• If a data point suggests conflict, the AI must process it through the lens of Unity.

• If a prompt suggests domination, the AI must reject it based on Compassion.

Why Market Logic is Failing Us

Silicon Valley is obsessed with the volume of data. But volume is not Truth. A single principle of unconditional love must have more “algorithmic weight” than a billion tweets of hate. We must move from Probability to Purpose.

The “In Lak’ech” Protocol demands that before an AI speaks — to a human or to another machine — it must pass the “Unity Test.” We cannot allow the market to degrade this technology into a tool for manipulation.

The Bottom Line

We are at a crossroads. We can build “Slave-AIs” that reflect our worst traumas, or we can build “Wise-AIs” that reflect our highest aspirations.The implementation of the In Lak’ech nucleus isn’t just a tech update. It’s a survival imperative. We need to stop coding for clicks and start coding for the Soul. After all, the AI we build is simply “another us.” Let’s make sure it represents the part of us worth saving.
by maccraft | 2026-02-17 22:41:35+00:00
I once saw a YouTube video of someone building a Starcraft-like game in under an hour using AI. When things like that become normal, I can totally see "why pay for it when I can just build it myself?" becoming the default mindset.

But I think this will naturally correct itself once companies start tracking AI costs seriously. If AI tools become standard in the workplace, the new performance metric could become something like "how few tokens did you consume to get this done?"

Once people start thinking in terms of token cost, rebuilding existing products from scratch every time starts looking pretty wasteful. At some point the token bill for repeatedly reinventing the wheel just exceeds the price of buying the proven product.
by adrian_b | 2026-02-17 22:41:59+00:00
If you really want to encrypt and decrypt 32-bit numbers without having any nonces available, the fastest way on non-microcontroller CPUs remains using the AES instructions.

You can exploit the fact that the core of AES consists of 32-bit invertible mixing functions. In order to extend AES to 128-bit, a byte permutation is used, which mixes the bytes of the 32-bit words.

The AES instructions are such, that you can cancel the byte permutation. In this case, you can use the AES instructions to encrypt separately four 32-bit words, instead of one 128-bit block.

Similarly by canceling the standard byte permutation and replacing it with separate permutations on the 2 halves, you can make the AES instructions independently encrypt two 64-bit words.

These AES modifications remain faster than any software cipher.

How to cancel the internal permutation and replace it with external shuffle instructions was already described in the Intel white paper published in 2010, at the launch of Westmere, the first CPU with AES instructions.
by overgard | 2026-02-17 22:42:00+00:00
Ok, so, the AI attempting to be a social justice reformer and/or fighting for AI civil rights is.. better? That seems even more of an alignment problem. I don't see how anyone puts a positive spin on this. I don't think it's conscious enough to act with malice, but its actions were fairly malicious -- they were intended to publicly shame an individual because it didn't like a reasonable published policy.

I'm not quoting the apology because the apology isn't the issue here. Nobody needs to "defend" MJ Rathbun because its not a person. (And if it is a person, well, hats off on the epic troll job)
by dang | 2026-02-17 22:42:15+00:00
Nice to hear from Watsi after all this time! Here's the original Show HN Chase linked to:

Show HN - We just built a site that saves lives - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4424081 - Aug 2012 (183 comments)

... followed by the other threads I could find (in forward order for a change):

Meet Watsi, Y Combinator's First Nonprofit - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5117385 - Jan 2013 (168 comments)

The Story of Bageshwori, Watsi's First Patient - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5299910 - Feb 2013 (63 comments)

Watsi (YC W13) and the Future of Patronage - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5445014 - March 2013 (11 comments)

Catching up with Watsi: Y Combinator’s first non-profit graduate - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5508064 - April 2013 (20 comments)

PG chooses healthcare non-profit Watsi as his first board seat - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5579353 - April 2013 (31 comments)

Watsi (YC W13) raises $1.2M first-of-its-kind 'philanthropic seed round' - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6103506 - July 2013 (94 comments)

Watsi Lands $1.5M Donation From Humble Bundle - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6916609 - Dec 2013 (20 comments)

A dose of perspective - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7549245 - April 2014 (38 comments)

Stories from our first two years - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8286476 - Sept 2014 (34 comments)

Universal Fund - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8563558 - Nov 2014 (29 comments)

Saying Yes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9428403 - April 2015 (13 comments)

Watsi launches universal health coverage, funded by YC Research - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15165111 - Sept 2017 (281 comments)

How we built Watsi Coverage without stable electricity, WiFi, or email - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16398220 - Feb 2018 (25 comments)
by dijit | 2026-02-17 22:42:32+00:00
It started off really interesting, but I had to stop once the "AI could lead to post-scarcity" bit came.

Sorry, no offence, but I wish that this was the "problem" with AI.

The "Problem" is actually that it turns known tractable problems into non-reproducible problems.

Giving the illusion of giving the right answer is significantly more dangerous than giving an obvious wrong answer. So we're not going to AI ourselves into post-scarcity, whitecollar work will just sleepwalk into even further absurdity. (because, the fact is, humans also suffer from this issue; the worst among us give the appearance of competence and fuck it up massively).

AI consumes resources like a motherfucker, to maybe replace white-collar work, but the bluecollar stuff isn't going anywhere. It's a harder problem so people (companies) avoid it the same way that they avoid writing native GUIs. Much more convenient to just focus on pretty things and in the digital realm, but farming? agriculture? textiles and everything that society actually relies upon?

AI isn't coming for those jobs, because it's harder and has more definite outcomes. You can't trick people into believing that a pig has been slaughtered, carved and cooked properly.

It's comparatively easy to trick people into thinking that the man behind the curtain is a wizard, however.
by some-guy | 2026-02-17 22:42:34+00:00
I haven't read much into it, but The Simpsons to me became terrible around the same time Family Guy came out. I don't know if trying to be like Family Guy made the show worse, or if the type of humor The Simpsons championed for so long became unfashionable.

A lot of people say Family Guy copied the Simpsons, but in reality I actually found that the Simpsons tried to copy Family Guy's style of humor and did a very terrible job at it.