by vee-kay | 2026-02-06 15:49:16+00:00
> There were actual unacceptable risks or side-effects from the vaccine under test.

1. Why were these Clinical trials of HPV vaccines on tens of thousands of minor Indian girls disguised as a "study" (rather than "clinical trials", which is what they were, shoddy and dangerous its implementation and execution certainly was).
2. Why did MGMF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) and its NGO PATH (which led this study, nay, clinical trial) not do repatriations to the affected victims? Why was no medical insurance and other safety/precautionary mechanisms arranged for an experimental drug being administered to tens of thousands of minors?
3. Why did PATH and BGMF not get the INFORMED CONSENT from the minors (patients) and parents? What were they trying to hide?
4. "Clinical trials" means the HPV drug was still in Development stage. Do you understand what that means?

If you don't, you have no business defending such unethical malpractices that avoid such culpability and responsibilities for clinical trials of dangerous drugs.

If you say yes, then you'll also agree that the drug makers and organisers of clinical trials knew the drug can have serious side effects (since it was supposedly a vaccine for cervical cancer). Did they inform the Indian children and their parents about any serious risks/dangers, before administration of this drug to those minors?
-- Answer is No.

So WHY did BMGF and PATH not take INFORMED CONSENT before giving a dangerous experimental drug? Why were the minor patients MISLED on what they were being given?
Why was no medical insurance provided to the patients unsuspectingly undergoing this risky experiment?
-- Answer is obvious. It is because they KNEW the drug is dangerous and risky. But they went ahead, and gave it secretively to tens of thousands of minor girls.

> What the article does show is that there was shoddy handling of consent. Which is valid criticism!

5. Why are clinical trials of an experimental (under-development) drug NOT being completed in the country (USA) of its invention on same kind of target audience (minor girls), but instead they are being conducted halfway across the world away on Indian children (minor girls) WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT (from them and their parents)?

6. Is it okay to avoid doing clinical trial in home country with consent, but ethical to do it in another nation on poor unsuspecting minors without consent?

> But it is also somewhat unsurprising given the low literacy rate at that time and place. And this alone is simply not sufficient foundation for your accusations.

7. Are you really claiming that Bill Gates, his Foundation staff, their partner organisations (PATH, etc.) and the medical staff who were all involved in this unethical clinical trials of unproven drug, were all uneducated and unaware of the risks?! If so, you are lying and condoning evil.

>Your article is careful to never explicitly state correlation between the vaccine and those seven girls deaths. Without such a link, your argument falls apart.

8. The Parliamentary committee's report clearly indicted the HPV vaccines as a causative factor for some of the deaths and hospitalizations (with severe adverse effects). It also indicted the PATH (NGO that led the clinical trials), government body (ICMR), health ministry, and confirmed that BGMF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) was involved in the funding of PATH for this specific clinical trials (under guise of "study") of HPV vaccines manufactured by Merck and GSK.

I can throw more and more facts and links here. But you already know the game is up, don't you?