MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by YesBox | 2026-02-23 05:22:03+00:00
By the time I was in high school, we had laptop carts that were rolled out for a few classes (as in a handful of times per year). This was 2004+. We also had computer labs since elementary school. Iirc laptops were used when labs were booked up.

I recall the experience being distracting. Computers are more fun than classes. No matter how much you lock down the machine, a kid will figure a way to make it more interesting than class. Computers can do so much. Children are curious.

I remember sneaking in flash games, ms paint/kidpix, browsing the web and whatever.

Anecdotal.. but i certainly wasn’t the only kid fooling around.

I don’t know what the “right amount” is, but I turned out ok. Though the iPhone was introduced after I graduated high school
by AngryData | 2026-02-23 05:22:07+00:00
In my experience school boards are anything but democratic. The only people that heartfully pursue those positions are the handful of assholes that shouldn't be in those positions for any reason. And their election is just a choose your flavor of asshole that can manage a half decent public persona and is sitting on excess capital to blow on marketing. Nobody knows who these people are, even in small towns with life long residency, half the people on the board nobody knows unless they are also on the school board and met them through it. Even if people cared about their board's membership, how do you realistically vet them all without having shit tons of free time to go personally meet them or follow them around?
by bronlund | 2026-02-23 05:22:43+00:00
Does anyone knows if using microwaves might possibly affect the nutritional value of the food? Or if radiation can leak and act upon your body if you stand very close to it. Heated plastic doesn’t sound too healthy either. And why do we never see commercials about microwaves?

I know nothing about these things, but I still only use it to heat my cold cup of coffee - and I’m standing way back while I do :) I even own a pyroceram skillet.
by noosphr | 2026-02-23 05:23:17+00:00
This is the argument that Chinese use for keeping their characters. It's ultimate expression is defending electric motor to be written as "lighting clouds power tree table" because if we didn't then it would be anarchy.

English is intelligible enough that someone from Vancouver can easily talk to someone from Sydney and every other major population center in between.

That someone in a two sheep village in Scotland might have trouble reading War and Peace isn't a reason to abuse every child for a decade before they too develop the same brain damage as the adults who abused them.
by CableNinja | 2026-02-23 05:25:41+00:00
Unless you watch actual TV theres no reason to buy an actual TV in my opinion. You can get nicely large monitors and displays for pretty cheap, and a minipc or even a stick pc and youre good to go.

Both of my 'TV's are big monitors with some lenovo minipcs running debian. Hardwired, but i could wifi them if i want.

Zero tracking, zero bullshit.
by BoorishBears | 2026-02-23 05:25:42+00:00
It's not about a tweet, just read your own quote.

You cannot authenticate with anything but Claude Code and Claude.ai.

But you do not need to authenticate with Claude Agent SDK (even though you can using env variables).

When you authenticate with Claude Code (allowed), Claude Agent SDK works without any further authentication.

It's really annoying that people keep trying to make this complicated because the inevitable end result is that they remove authless usage of the Agent SDK and save themselves the headache.

I really hate Clawdb-Moltb-OpenC-NanoCode or whatever half-baked project the grifters are on this week for ruining a good thing for the rest of us.
by greggoB | 2026-02-23 05:25:53+00:00
> not to mention the its bias is reason that Grokipedia came about in the first place.

No, the reason is Musk didn't like that the Wikipedia article on him added the factual record of him doing a Nazi salute [0]

[0] https://www.lemonde.fr/en/united-states/article/2025/01/23/m...
by LLSODE | 2026-02-23 05:28:14+00:00
Hi HN. I'm from Llewellyn Systems. ODE (Organized Decision Engine) is an AI-native enterprise OS — not a chatbot wrapper, not an agent framework. It's a runtime where 21 autonomous AI agents coordinate under enforceable governance. It's live in production.

Why an OS, not a point solution: Most AI-in-enterprise approaches bolt a model onto one workflow. We built a shared execution environment where agents have defined skills, scoped permissions, and structured communication. 21 agents, 55 registered skills, 800+ API endpoints. Agents operate within a skill chainer that composes multi-step executions across agent boundaries.

Constitutional governance — hardcoded, not prompted: ODE enforces 10 constitutional laws. These aren't system prompts. They're hardcoded constraints checked on every agent action at the application layer. No agent can authorize its own financial exposure. No single agent can override multi-tenant data isolation. Every decision must produce a verifiable audit record.

3-head decision protocol: High-risk actions require sign-off from three executive agents evaluating orthogonal dimensions: operational impact, constitutional compliance, and financial exposure. All three must approve. Inspired less by AI safety literature and more by nuclear launch protocols — independent verification across different concern axes.

Crypto-backed provenance: Every agent decision produces a cryptographically verifiable audit trail. In regulated industries, "the AI decided" isn't acceptable.

Agent-to-agent commerce: External AI agents can discover ODE's capabilities via .well-known/agents.json, then hire and pay ODE agents through an A2A protocol. Not agent orchestration within a system — agent commerce across organizational boundaries.

What's open source: 15,000 enterprise use cases on HuggingFace: https://huggingface.co/datasets/LlewellynSystems/ode-enterpr...

Stack: Next.js 15, Express.js 5, Supabase PostgreSQL, Prisma ORM.

Honest bottleneck: Latency on 3-head consensus under load — p99 gets uncomfortable on complex actions. Agent commerce dispute resolution between organizations is a hard open problem.

Happy to go deep on any of this.
by MilkMp | 2026-02-23 05:29:02+00:00
Hey there, yeah, definitely. I maintain .txt change logs for all data modifications. To be clear, no information is added or altered — the Factbook content is exactly what the CIA published. The parsing process structures the raw text into fields (removing formatting artifacts, sectioning headers, and deduplicating noise lines), but the actual data values are untouched. What I've added on top are lookup tables that map the CIA's FIPS 10-4 codes to ISO Alpha-2/3 and a unified MasterCountryID, so the different code systems can be joined and queried together.

I will add them to the github :)
by fc417fc802 | 2026-02-23 05:30:26+00:00
I don't think that's an accurate prediction. Currently less than 10 year old hardware gets recycled for pennies on the dollar. That's effectively due to the combination of how cheap and how much better the cutting edge hardware is. If it suddenly became more expensive it would just see slower adoption.

Case in point, this very comment section. The major suppliers have discontinued DDR4 production because it's "obsolete" meanwhile capacity for that exact same technology is coming online in China. What makes sense just depends on context.
Most web utility sites are going to die soon
by hussachai | 2026-02-23 05:30:30+00:00
When I wanted to decode JWT or format the JSON that I got from the system, I searched for those tools in Google.
I'd choose one from the top results and use it. But every time, I felt like this was wrong.
What if they intercepted my JWT? What if they saved my JSON?
Those files sometimes could have personal information or even worse, actual access to the system.

My laziness won over my guilt every time, but not anymore. AI can generate those tools easily.
I just built one for myself (took a couple of hours to perfect it). You can use mine, build from mine, or you can even generate your own from scratch.
Those web utilities out there are security risks. Don't use them. They will be dead soon.

https://devtools.wsgrok.com (Runs entirely in your browser)

https://github.com/TailrecIO/devtools (Open source that you can build yourself or use as a starting point)

https://github.com/TailrecIO/devtools/releases/tag/v0.0.2 (Desktop version provided by Tauri, built from the attached source that you can review)

The site above is for my own use. If you trust me, you can use it. Otherwise, build your own.
by Aurornis | 2026-02-23 05:30:31+00:00
> it is ridiculous to build your buisness model around it and disrespectful to the customer's intellect

Many things in business are easy to defeat if you’re willing to break the rules. Enforcement is handled through audits, flagging suspicious activity, and investigations.

It’s ridiculous to think that because you can temporarily circumvent a restriction that the rules don’t apply.

I don’t agree with the excessive enforcement used, but there is a lot of tortured logic in this thread trying to argue that the contract terms shouldn’t apply to service usage because the customer doesn’t like the terms.
by nandomrumber | 2026-02-23 05:30:33+00:00
Just be careful doing this if there’s a radio telescope nearby:

However, about 25 FRBs detected mainly by the Parkes Radio Telescope and a few other observatories presented signatures that were very different. Although they covered a wide frequency range just like the other FRBs, the frequency-time structures of many of these events defied any physical model, and they did not show differences in the arrival times between the higher frequencies and the lower frequencies of the burst. Also, the location of these FRBs was difficult to pinpoint; the radiation seemed to come from all directions. The Parkes astronomers, mystified, dubbed these "abnormal" FRBs "perythons" after a mythical figure invented by the Argentinian author Jorge Luis Borges. The perythons’ signatures caused astronomers to doubt the extragalactic origin of FRBs [PDF] althogether. They might originate on or nearby Earth, the scientists began to believe, and some astronomers even suggested that these strange bursts might be produced by extraterrestrial civilizations.

Not long after focusing their attention on the perythons, the Parkes astronomers noticed that these FRBs seemed to take off during weekends. In 2014, they installed a radio frequency interference monitor at the observatory and decided that the culprits were probably some microwave ovens inside the observatory building. Tests with these microwave ovens yielded nothing—they emitted no radio pulses while they were running. The astronomers were flummoxed—that is, until one of the testers, during a third attempt, opened the door of a microwave oven before the magnetron was shut off by the timer.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/microwave-ovens-posing-as-astronom...
by nickm12 | 2026-02-23 05:31:34+00:00
This is a really nice take and matches my experiences as well. It also calls out one of the biggest incongruity of this current age: the sudden desire from management to have good specs and documentation for the benefit of the coding assistants.

For the first time in my career, I've seen an engineering org add "improve tech documentation" as a high-level goal. It makes me sad that it was never worthwhile to do for the engineers, but now we need it for the coding assistants who can't tell that our docs really out of date. On the flip side, the coding assistants will actually read the docs, unlike many engineers.
by renewiltord | 2026-02-23 05:33:18+00:00
If I say “you can use my car for $250/month if you don’t smoke in it” and then you pay me that money and you drive around until one day you smoke in it, I’m not going to let you smoke in my car. I told you not to smoke in it and you smoked in it. That’s the deal. All seems fine to me tbh.
by datapond | 2026-02-23 05:33:21+00:00
I love it.
It remembers context well, and the code quality is top notch.

I usually copy paste screenshot of the result as a feedback, and use a couple of round of reviews after the first iteration.
I also use it as a though partner on itself, asking it to take the role of a master ux designer, or expert sales person to find design flaws, and suggest improving the result... I am ditching intellij and Juno. I don't really like the editor on itself, because I am used to have my intellih shortcuts, but Gemini produces wonderfull code for me. Maybe because I give it good prompt. And the project I am building is a public good for society and the environment, so maybe gemini likes me more than he likes you... Who knows!
by peter_d_sherman | 2026-02-23 05:34:34+00:00
This is a highly interesting comment from user "thoughtfullyd4c9a86b93" on the above site:

>"My two cents worth — Logic is fundamental. Most of mathematics does not treat infinities nor singularities as first class citizens. Yet, there are a lot of problem classes in which you can actually reason with a set that includes those limits. My preference is a strict axiomatic hierarchy where you can not blend “levels”. Each level is a gatekeeper for the next tier.

The idea that mathematics is a language of its own does not work until you completely disambiguate mathematics in your language of choice — and logic is a language that facilitates complete understanding.

* ⟨T⟩0: ZFC (The Material). The box that contains the idea of a box. If you aren’t starting here, you aren’t even playing the game.

* ⟨T⟩1: Topology (The Stage). This defines “nearness” before you own a ruler. It’s the rubber floor where a donut is a coffee cup—and where singularities (like the zero-point or the absolute) are perfectly admissible inhabitants.

* ⟨T⟩2: Geometry (The Ruler). Adding distance and angles. It’s just Topology after it’s been forced to commit to a specific measurement.

* ⟨T⟩3: Algebra (The Syntax). The ledger for people who trust the ruler more than the stage. It tracks the symmetries the geometry allows.

* ⟨T⟩4: Analysis (The Measure). Measuring the vibration of a string to prove the violin is real. Great for change, but “blind” to the structural admissibility of the stage itself."
by wpm | 2026-02-23 05:34:45+00:00
I've found for me what helps me do such things is actually writing, but writing about what I read. It forces me to not gloss over or skip anything. Like a form of recital. "This function takes a pointer called blah and uses it to blah blah...". I'll go line by line basically rewriting the program in plain English. Especially helpful for languages I'm not that familiar with.

As someone mostly self taught that's how I've always done it until I do it enough I can do it in my head.
Show HN: AI-Native Architecture Series (Open-Source)
by madawei2699 | 2026-02-23 05:35:49+00:00
Hi HN,

Open-sourced my complete AI-native architecture series from a solo builder project (spare time).

4 articles (EN/ZH) covering:
- Constrained DSL for reliable LLM decisions
- 60/40 → 90/10 AI-driven development workflow
- "Boring" hybrid agent architecture
- Low-cost multi-vendor cloud scaling

Real scale: 28 repos, 538k LOC, 3k+ users, low four-digit RMB yearly infra.

Repo: https://github.com/myinvestpilot/ai-architecture

Pure sharing, no promo. Feedback, critiques, or your solo AI-native experiences welcome!

Thanks
by Aurornis | 2026-02-23 05:36:06+00:00
First of all, I doubt they’re losing money in inference. Even across subscriptions. This is a tired argument that has been repeated so many times on HN.

Second, that’s not what dumping means. It’s a specific term for international trade.

Third, it’s not illegal to sell something for below the cost to make it. That’s another common misunderstanding.
by 3836293648 | 2026-02-23 05:36:12+00:00
Deno is a native implementation of a standard library, it doesn't have language implementation of its own, it just bundles the one from Safari (javascriptcore).

This is a set of linting tools and a typestripper, a program that removes the type annotations from typescript to make turn it into pure javascript (and turn JSX into document.whateverMakeElement calls). It still doesn't have anything to actually run the program.
by gfody | 2026-02-23 05:36:42+00:00
just getting knoll's law'd or gell-mann triggered as HN does, "modern enterprise security" is a 20-layer cake of serious itu and nist cryptographic protocols like radius and x509 kerberos (which we're depressed about for some reason? is it because it can't be implemented in javascript?) but it's saml that's used at the web (shit) application-tier for customers of saas products so that's the technology that makes the world go round according to HN... just ignore me, most of HN's database threads do this to me as well
by shartshooter | 2026-02-23 05:37:45+00:00
One of my friends was an elite athlete a couple of decades back(eg. won a national champion in a solo track and field event as well as a gold medal in the world championships)

He’s mentioned before how he’s always had bad teeth. He chalks it up to growing up around bad water, I assumed it was because he eats bagels and other carbohydrates almost exclusively, but maybe this is why!
by harshitaneja | 2026-02-23 05:38:41+00:00
Just adding for context that I use Gemini Ultra and across all models from Gemini 3.1 Pro to Claude Opus 4.6, I have never hit 429s as well as hitting model quota limits is incredibly rare and only happens if I am trying to run 3 projects at once. While not the biggest agentic coding fan, I have been toying with them and have been running it for at least 7-8 hours a day if not longer.
by thunderfork | 2026-02-23 05:38:45+00:00
I was really surprised by how many games still end up feeling playable on a cross-continent Moonlight session. With ~70ms ping, there's still a lot of "realtime" games that feel fine.

Platformers tend to be a-ok, although anything with mouselook aiming tends to be really rough, since you rely so much harder on a tighter visual feedback loop for constant adjustments to aim.
by legostormtroopr | 2026-02-23 05:39:24+00:00
Firstly - you are going to get sued by Salesforce. You can't just make a Slack-clone, use their trademarked name and just add "Open" to the front.

Secondly, this is pure AI slop. There are 2 commits - "Initial commit" and "Trim feature table" where you changed the README.

Why would anyone use this? Has anyone read any of the code? Do you even understand how (or if) it even works?
by Aurornis | 2026-02-23 05:39:58+00:00
> * Why did openclaw allow Google anti gravity logins?

OpenClaw went from virtually unheard of to a sensation in a couple weeks. There was intense commit activity and the main author bragged about not even reading the code himself. It was all heavily AI driven and moving at an extreme rate. Everyone was competing to get their commits in because they wanted to be a part of it.

The entire project was a fast and furious experiment. Nobody was stopping to think if something was a good idea or not when someone published a plugin for using this endpoint. People just thought “cool!” and installed it.
by fortzi | 2026-02-23 05:40:03+00:00
Yes indeed. I picked the first few search results for “usage of the word genocide lately”, assuming that you haven’t bothered to do that yourself, in hope that you’ll spend a few minutes getting educated on a subject you talk about with such conviction.

[1] https://forward.com/opinion/805648/genocide-has-become-meani...

[2] https://www.maxim.org.nz/article/genocide-shouldnt-be-over-u...

[3] https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2024/09/the-dilution-of-ge...
by ludjer | 2026-02-23 05:40:17+00:00
Its called economies of scale. When they server 200000 ai subscriptions they dont expect everyone to use the max. They expect some will use more and some will use less and at the end of the day it will even out. Thats how every service works that is for the masses. As soon as you want a guaranteed 1000 tokens you should pay for that.
Show HN: GrowthClaw, a workflow pack for deterministic growth execution
by dankrieg | 2026-02-23 05:40:24+00:00
GrowthClaw is an open source workflow pack and skill that connects to OpenClaw and provides it with a structured marketing runtime.

It adds an explicit operating layer around the agent by modeling product context, generating strategy versions, producing prioritized tasks, enforcing approval gates, executing work, and evaluating outcomes through controlled state transitions. Workflows are declared in YAML and all entities such as tasks, artifacts, evaluations, and strategy revisions are persisted in SQLite, making the system inspectable and replayable.

Each agent role follows a defined rubric, and execution results feed into a scheduled strategy evolution loop that reassesses context and prior performance before proposing new work. Nothing runs without approval, but iteration continues autonomously based on observed outcomes and stored state.

The goal is to explore whether growth can be delegated to an agent operating inside a constrained feedback system, where adaptation emerges from measurable results and decisions are governed by explicit rules rather than informal adjustments.
by peter_d_sherman | 2026-02-23 05:41:43+00:00
Here is what Grok says about the above (I asked it to explain it better):

Grok:

"⟨T⟩0: ZFC (The Material) — Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (the standard foundation for most modern mathematics). Called "The Material" and metaphorically "the box that contains the idea of a box," highlighting how ZFC provides the basic "stuff" (sets) out of which everything else is built. Without this, "you aren’t even playing the game."

⟨T⟩1: Topology (The Stage) — Introduces the primitive notion of "nearness" or continuity without any rigid measurement (no distances or angles yet). Famously, topology is "rubber-sheet geometry," where continuous deformations are allowed, so a donut and a coffee mug are equivalent (both have one hole/handle). Singularities/infinities (e.g., zero-point in physics or the point at infinity in projective geometry) can exist naturally here without causing foundational issues.

⟨T⟩2: Geometry (The Ruler) — Builds on topology by adding concrete measurements (distances, angles, metrics). It's topology "forced to commit" to specifics.

⟨T⟩3: Algebra (The Syntax) — Focuses on symmetries and structures (groups, rings, fields, etc.) that geometry permits. It's more abstract and rule-based ("the ledger" tracking allowed operations).

⟨T⟩4: Analysis (The Measure) — Deals with limits, continuity, change, integration/differentiation, etc. ("measuring the vibration of a string"). It's powerful for dynamics but "blind" to deeper structural issues in the underlying topology or sets.

(Or, phrased another way, it's one set of possibilities for a "Math/Mathematics Stack" (AKA "Abstraction Hierarchy", "Math Abstraction Hierarchy") built level by level, on top of the foundation of Logic...)
by ratnaditya | 2026-02-23 05:42:25+00:00
The supply chain angle is the right framing — the typosquat example with mcp-servr-github is exactly the kind of thing that's hard to catch manually.
One thing I've been thinking about in this space: static scanning at install time is necessary but not sufficient. A server can pass a clean scan and still behave dangerously at runtime — either because it changes its tool descriptions after installation (the MCP rug pull attack Invariant Labs documented), or because two individually safe tools create a dangerous combination when chained together. Email access alone is fine. Web browser alone is fine. Together they're a data exfiltration path that no static scanner would flag.
Curious whether MCPShield has any plans to address chaining and runtime behavior, or if the focus is intentionally on the pre-deployment supply chain problem?
by nine_k | 2026-02-23 05:43:31+00:00
This totally depends on how you set up your org face attributes. I keep using Org because, for me, it's far more readable than Markdown.

Also, it's always a tree. The three operations, like folding, traversal,. etc, are essential for me, and not available in Markdown.

Fortunately, GitHub understands README.org files.