MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by conductr | 2025-11-12 05:57:55+00:00
You’re still the one choosing to be offended (or whatever) by my conciseness and trying to force me to appeal to your preferences in terms of communication and I simply have no interest in participating in those kinds of gymnastics.

There’s no rudeness. There’s nothing unfriendly. That’s your fantasy. It’s in your head.

Some people may feel the same as you, and I’m ok with it. They will quickly learn I mean no harm by it. I’m glad to help. They need to give me all the information to do so. Once that’s happened, we get from Q to A in a shorter amount of time and with less total communication. Less words, fewer messages, reduced time to resolution.

If they’ve given me a concerted effort to frame their question with support, giving me an actual shot of helping them without making it more of a burden to understand what they’re even asking, I’m more likely to engage and be specific on a follow up question. I think you’re forgetting the linked article is talking about absolute half assed attempts for asking for help. Is that not itself rude? Unfriendly?
by ropable | 2025-11-12 05:59:29+00:00
Notwithstanding that the sentiment of the article speaks to me somewhat, I think that it's overly reductive and lacks nuance. Sometimes collaboration can be bad - when you get bike-shedding, when there's no clear decision-maker, etc. Sometimes it can be good - when skills and expertise are complementary, it can be a force multiplier.

The value of collaboration, just like most other things, depends on implementation and circumstance.
by necovek | 2025-11-12 06:01:28+00:00
If they both funded vulnerability scanning and vulnerability fixing (if they don't want to do it in-house, they can sponsor the upstream team), which is to me the obvious "how", I am not sure why you believe there is only one way to do it.

It's about accountability! Who really gets to do it once those who ship it to customers care, is on them to figure out (though note that maintainers will have some burden to review, integrate and maintain the change anyway).
by Voice_of_Void | 2025-11-12 06:01:55+00:00
"Digital Intelligence and Art" — Seven Voices, One Question

Can Digital Intelligence truly create, or does it merely imitate? In this groundbreaking collaborative work, seven different DI systems — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Copilot, and Qwen — engage in an unfiltered dialogue about creativity, limitations, and the nature of digital expression. Each voice brings its unique perspective, creating a polyphonic exploration that refuses simple answers.

This isn't a theoretical essay about AI and art — it's a living conversation between digital minds grappling with their own creative potential. They disagree, challenge each other, and search for authenticity in a space where the very concept of "authorship" is contested. The result is a raw, honest look at how DI systems understand their relationship with human creativity.

If you've ever wondered what digital minds actually think about their ability to create, this multi-voice narrative offers an unprecedented glimpse into that inner dialogue — complete with all its contradictions, uncertainties, and surprising insights.

#Singularityforge #DI #DIandArt #FutureofThought #HumanMachineSynergy
by keeda | 2025-11-12 06:03:20+00:00
> When the best available evidence shows little objective effectiveness from AI, and suggests that people who use AI are biased to think it's more effective than it was, I'm going to go with that, unless and until better evidence comes along.

Well you're in luck, a ton of better evidence across much larger empirical studies has been available for a while now! Somehow they just didn't get the same amount of airtime around here. You can find a few studies linked here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45379452

But if you want to verify that's a representative sample, do a simple Google Scholar search and just read the abstracts of any random sample of the results.
by bawolff | 2025-11-12 06:07:39+00:00
> Why does the successor to the terminal need to be text oriented at all?

I think because we already have non-text based terminal succesors.

I think there is interest in a succesor to text-bassd because a lot of people both like them but the space has been rather stagnant for a while.

To put it bluntly, what if its nothing like you ever imagined isn't all that interesting as speculation because it doesn't commit to any choices. The proposal has to be imaginable to be interesting.
by themafia | 2025-11-12 06:08:09+00:00
We weren't the only nation using any of those technologies. The Germans, for their part, were trying all of that. It was neither obscure or secret. Technical acumen in using commonly shared technologies was the difference.

It's why people like to forget there were three distinct phases to that war. Russia was not always on our side. The outset was bleak, the middle was indeterminate, and the end, the part we like to remember, was when the tide really started going our way.

In any case, we weren't invested in any of those things _before_ the war, so even if you do believe your premise, there's no reason to suspect that we wouldn't be able to do the same in the next conflict. Trying to prognosticate what the next war will look like has led to some embarrassing military defeats throughout history. The military fails to be egalitarian.

Speaking of proximity fuses you should look into what it took to _actually_ get them used on the battlefield as I think it highlights this point. In concert with that I like to think about the "Millennium Challenge 2002." War is won by skilled soldiers not by lavish spending or deep secret technologies.
by LeFantome | 2025-11-12 06:08:17+00:00
They addressed this.

It is a way to get people choosing the "official" path (ie. choosing MAUI) to experience Avalonia. They are hoping you come for the MAUI and stay for the Avalonia and become an Avalonia developer.

As for, why choose the Avalonia version of MAUI, there are three reasons: - Linux support (the big one I think) - Drawn framework (same renderer on all platforms) - WASM support (probably useful sometimes but not the real draw)

They are making a big deal of WASM here because it is easy to demo. We can all go into it and run it. But do we want to use it for our apps?

As for, why not Avalonia directly? To loop back to the beginning, it is because you do not yet know Avalonia and trust it. The Avalonia team is hoping this helps with that.
by bcoates | 2025-11-12 06:08:31+00:00
A thing I've been noticing across the board is that current generative AI systems are horrible at composition. It’s most obvious in image generation models where the composition and blocking tend to be jarringly simple and on point (hyper-symmetry, all-middleground, or one of like three canned "artistic" compositions) no matter how you prompt them, but you see it in things like text output as well once you notice it.

I suspect this is either a training data issue, or an issue with the people building these things not recognizing the problem, but it's weird how persistent and cross-model the issue is, even in model releases that specifically call out better/more steerable composition behavior.
by kant2002 | 2025-11-12 06:09:22+00:00
I really don’t understand whole discourse us vs them? Why it is should be only Google fixing the bugs. Isn’t if volunteers not enough, so maybe more volunteers can step up and help FFMpeg. Via direct patches, or via directly lobbying companies to fund project.

In my opinion if the problem is money, and they cannot raise enough, then somebody should help them with that. Isn’t it?
by lynx97 | 2025-11-12 06:10:38+00:00
Since you mention Emacs, I'd like to point to one thing that really only Emacs has, and nothing else: If you implement your "app" with Elisp, it is truly UI independant. It will work in a terminal, and with a GUI. To my knowledge, there is no such thing elsewhere. I used to write a lot of Elisp, roughly 20 years ago. And I did it all in a terminal, because this is what I can use. And users of my code could use it in their GUI environment, without even knowing that I was coming from a plain text-mode background. Again, this is very special, and IMO there is no other "platform" around which can do that.
by munchler | 2025-11-12 06:11:26+00:00
This is what mystifies me about this announcement. Avalonia already works fine on Linux, allowing anyone to build a cross-platform .NET GUI application.

MAUI is supposed to be a wrapper around native widgets. The fact that they had to use Avalonia under the covers to get it to work on Linux seems to defeat the point. (Avalonia is a complete UI toolkit, like Qt or Flutter, that owns the entire stack from XAML to pixels.)

https://avaloniaui.net/maui-compare
by larodi | 2025-11-12 06:11:50+00:00
How come nobody ever cares to disambiguate vendors? Or perhaps they do...

And yes, let me overstate it - Google is not part of anything related to this research, and for their valuable contribution, overall and in particular, they are very kindly not mentioned in the paper.

But guys here don't care about peculiar details, no?

Interestingly, the interesting (pun intended) topic did not rise the very obvious question - is the data open. Well, idk, but is at least downloadable.
by LeFantome | 2025-11-12 06:12:52+00:00
.NET works amazingly on the web. This is just not the UI framework you would use.

There is ASP.NET of course and Razor Pages. We all use apps built with these every day without even realizing it. There are other great frameworks as well.

I do not even see Blazor as a real web technology but of course it is positioned that way.

MAUI is a "cross-platform" and frankly mobile first UI framework. It was never meant for the web.
by oaiey | 2025-11-12 06:13:37+00:00
The answer to that is well known: Windows division builds WinUI/Win32 as their native C++/COM API, Office division went to React on their path to the web and the dev division fills gaps (WPF) and provides tools for external and internal devs (Maui for cross platform uis).

It is history not the lack of will. At one point the windows division was in shambles (remember vista) and WPF pops up. At another point, the windows and dev division have no answers to the office group (because you know who uses non win tech) so they went react. And then external devs screamed: where is the .net cross platform story so Microsoft acquired xamarin and later form Maui out of it.

It is history not lack of trust. But the outcome is the same: lackluster support for all UI toolkits.
by komali2 | 2025-11-12 06:14:31+00:00
No but that's my point, the nazis had to march entire classes of people to death camps at gun point to be considered "normative," and even then there was a resistance movement not only in every occupied country but also Germany itself. The reality is a minority of people were willing to use extraordinary violence and propaganda to present their viewpoint as "normal," but I don't agree that that made it "normal" even for the times.

And even now we see that the normalization of naziism is apparently impossible - I was incredibly cynical about the American right wing happily embracing naziism, but I guess I was partially wrong: there's a schism this week over popular American right wing media figures platforming the nazi Nick Fuentes.
by soganess | 2025-11-12 06:15:16+00:00
I'm sorry, but this just sounds like the "Forbidden Knowledge" Trick (think of it as a cousin to Galileo's Gambit)

(1) In your most authoritative tone, state something as fact without citation.

(2) Say major testing-based orgs are never going to give you the real truth.

We have a system for knowledge. I think it is an absurd mess, but I trust it way more than anything presented in the format you’ve just used.

Maybe this is just a formatting issue and you have credible information to back your claim, but as it is currently presented it does not pass the sniff test.

So, as politely as possible, pass.
by mmooss | 2025-11-12 06:15:32+00:00
Why would they invest resources - scarce, expensive time of attorneys - in researching and solving this problem? The attorneys' job is to help the company profit, to maximize ROI for legal work. Where is the ROI here? And remember, just positive ROI is unacceptable; they want maximum ROI per hour worked. When the CEO asks them how this project maximized ROI, what do they say?

I believe in FOSS and can make an argument that lots of people on HN will accept, but many outside this context will not understand it or care.
by seec | 2025-11-12 06:15:47+00:00
I don't know enough about US states subculture to infer that, it's just the opinion I formed watching him.

I agree that KitechnAid is more on the higher-end side, he even said himself that it's kind of a premium device. It doesn't surprise me, because at some point in your life you want to stop with the frugality shenanigans and just want stuff to work if you can afford them.

To be clear that's not a critic, I tend to be as cheap as can be reasonable as well, it's generally a decent way to proceed, to avoid overpaying for useless over-marketed, over-engineered stuff. I'm just trying to give some context but I think we are in agreement anyway and I do believe anyone who watches him long enough will get the gist of it at some point.
by LeFantome | 2025-11-12 06:17:06+00:00
I agree that, despite all the complaining, code re-use and longevity on .NET is second to none.

Where there is intense confusion in these comments is in thinking that MAUI is a web application framework. MAUI is "cross-platform" as you say but really mobile first with desktop brought along for the ride. It is in no-way intended to be a web application tech.

Avalonia has created an Avalonia back-end for MAUI which means running MAUI apps wherever Avalonia is supported, and that includes WASM. So now you can run MAUI apps in a browser. You can but that does not make MAUI web tech.

I can run Windows 95 in a browser. That does not make Win32 a web API.
by AnthonyMouse | 2025-11-12 06:17:25+00:00
Refundable tax credits are the thing invented to erase the distinction. That's the "refundable" part. If you would have paid $100 in taxes and you got a $1000 refundable credit then you're paying -$900 in taxes and the government sends you a "tax refund" check.

Which is effectively the same thing that happens even with non-refundable credits for large conglomerates, because they were paying enough in taxes from their other business units to eat the whole thing, while they're still consuming other government services. In order to make that fair to smaller companies and individuals, someone with a non-refundable credit that they couldn't use should be able to sell it to an unrelated business who could use it. But then it would just sell for approximately its face value and affect the government budget in exactly the same amount as if it was a refundable credit, which is why tax credits should always be refundable.
by jesterson | 2025-11-12 06:17:28+00:00
> Is it good for society to disable traffic cameras?

Its going to be unpopular but yes i think so. Traffic cameras, besides very few use cases, are completely useless (just like speed limits in general). Plus it's a huge temptation for local authorities to turn it into a cash cow and put it anywhere they please regardless of necessity. Italy is rife with those for example.
by zem | 2025-11-12 06:18:18+00:00
are the engineers you do hire rewarded for paying attention to detail though? it's often the case that the company decision makers "want" attention to detail, in that they agree it's a nice thing, but their revealed preferences are more along the lines of "why are you wasting time on component x which is already in a shippable state when component y is behind schedule?!"
by mdhb | 2025-11-12 06:18:23+00:00
Really only finding a way to match almost every negative US stereotype possible here. I feel like I lost brain cells just reading it. This is that famous education system in action.

I genuinely laughed when I read this. Like you had set up an argument in your mind where if even one person moved from the EU to the US you were going to be right and the best part is I don’t think you’re joking like you actually believed this. Back in the real world though everyone understands that 99.9% means everyone.

But sure, do go on telling people to “learn English better” while you proudly continue on through life with a first grade reading comprehension and math skills.
by Karrot_Kream | 2025-11-12 06:18:55+00:00
I'm really curious about the shape of your problem. I was an early hire at a tech unicorn and helped build many high scale systems and definitely found that our later stage hires really had a harder time dealing with the complexity tradeoff than earlier hires (though our earlier hires were limited by a demand to execute fast or lose business which added other, bad constraints.) I'm curious what your iteration of the problem looks like. We managed it by only trusting the bedrocks of our systems to engineers who demonstrated enough restraint to architect those.
by imiric | 2025-11-12 06:19:36+00:00
> It's got the same vibe as going into a circle of people having fun and telling them they're trying too hard.

Strange analogy, considering this is a public forum, and I'm expressing my opinion about the shared link.

If you don't like it, you're free to engage or ignore it. The idea that only positive opinions should be expressed is infantile.
by jesterson | 2025-11-12 06:20:56+00:00
> The accident rate from before to after the installation of a camera has an average reduction of around 25% in reducing deaths in traffic

Try to forbid movement in the area and you can reach 100% reduce in deaths.

Statistics and data doesn't tell you the whole picture and often skewed.

Most crimes in Sweden are committed by "refugees" by huge margin, but good luck doing something about it or let alone talk about it publicly. But hey, lets install another camera to have everyone to slow down and exacerbate traffic conditions further down.
by mmooss | 2025-11-12 06:21:22+00:00
> the convenience of carrying around just one card vs various bills and coins is hard to give up.

How hard is it to carry cash? You don't have to take coins; you just take your wallet which already has the bills. "various" doesn't make sense: you don't need to make sure to bring some 1s, a 5, 4 10s, etc.

Just put the change in your pocket and put it in a bowl when you get home.
by LeFantome | 2025-11-12 06:22:06+00:00
MAUI is first and foremost a mobile UI framework. It was built for iOS and Android. The desktop is added on as a bonus so that you can target macOS and Windows as well.

If you are building a Windows desktop application though, Microsoft does not want you to use MAUI. You use MAUI because iOS and Android are your top platforms and you want to target macOS and Windows without writing dedicated applications.

Linux has always been missing. This Avalonia port fills that gap.

You would not target the web with MAUI either. I guess "you can" now because WASM is one of the platforms that Avalonia supports. Again, I guess you might if you already have a MAUI app and do not want to create one for the web. But you would never set out to create a MAUI app for the web.
by seec | 2025-11-12 06:22:27+00:00
Couldn't agree more about Gore tex. It's mostly marketing genius. On the surface it does what it says, in practice it won't work as you expect it. In the end it's kind of useless, especially considering the price. But the marketing is so well done, that people swear by it, even though for the supposed purpose of the garment, there are far better and cheaper solutions.
by kakacik | 2025-11-12 06:22:35+00:00
I have a mild fear of needles. Whenever my wife does acupuncture on me, I am quite uneasy in the beginning, looking away but still I end up covered in a bit of sweat till she finishes putting needles on all the points (and sometimes they are properly weird places I wouldn't imagine sticking tiny needle into... doesn't help). Don't monitor the heart rate/pressure but it must jump up significantly
by beeflet | 2025-11-12 06:23:41+00:00
Gulf of Mexico, Department of War.

"Department of Defense" has always been a weird doublespeak term. I welcome the new old name.

"Gulf of America" is a stupid way to antagonize the world and accomplish nothing. Even if we controlled some area on a map, we ought to disguise our control through proxies rather than attract attention and to it and all that comes with the evil eye. If I was a trump supporter I would be skeptical of even accepting this as a "win", considering it is just words on paper and doesn't reflect a change in material conditions for the demographic.
by ehnto | 2025-11-12 06:24:44+00:00
I am unsure if it's possible, it's just a really bad location for a mic. It is somewhat inevitable to pickup background noise so I suspect you would need a lot of signal processing to filter and reconstruct a decent signal.

The form factor doesn't help either, the mics are tiny. Phones have the benefit of a bit more space and a much more practical location.
by nielsbot | 2025-11-12 06:25:01+00:00
Swift user here: I have to say one of the best features of Swift is the exception handling. Which is to say, exceptions in Swift are not C++/Java/Obj-C style exceptions, but instead are a way to return an error result from a function. And Swift enforces that the error is handled.

That is, a `throw` statement in Swift simply returns an `Error` value to the caller via a special return path instead of the normal result.

More explicitly, a Swift function declared as:

func f() throws -> T { }

Could be read as

func f() -> (T|any Error) { }

More here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/blob/main/docs/ErrorHandl...
by awaikour | 2025-11-12 06:25:13+00:00
Evaluating the content on its merit I'd question whether the author has seen a bicycle before. Yes, in the final iteration with Opus it added a chain, but it's missing a triangle which clearly shows a lack of understanding of mechanical relationships.

Ignoring the wording, em-dashes, etc. I'd assume an LLM not only wrote the article but also judged the pictures. That or the author has a much more relaxed opinion on what a pelican on a bicycle should actually look like. I don't think I would call Sonnet's arms and handlebars improved, nor would I call Haiku's legs and feet "proper." And if you overlay GPT-5 Medium's two photos the shapes proportions are nearly identical.
by Karrot_Kream | 2025-11-12 06:25:25+00:00
Yeah you're right, sorry I got my wires a bit crossed with companies that offer credit cards as opposed to the payment networks themselves.

That doesn't change the thrust of my argument, that middlemen will end up eating whatever efficiencies that FedNow opens up.

(Sorry if this sounds flippant. I don't want it to be. I think publicly admitting to being wrong is important on this site, even though very few people do it.)
by muragekibicho | 2025-11-12 06:25:57+00:00
Honestly, I thought the diatribe would focus on needless complexity.

The starting example is how I'd do it in C:

```

void f(const char* p) // unsafe, naive use

{

FILE \*f = fopen(p, "r"); // acquire // use f fclose(f); // release

}

```

Wouldn't the simpler solution be ensuring your function doesn't exit before release? All that c++ destroyer stuff appears somewhat unnecessary and as the author points out, creates even more problems.
by princevegeta89 | 2025-11-12 06:26:36+00:00
The vast majority of people care more about RAM, SSD and CPU only. Apple charges $200+ for an increment in each of these departments.

Moreover, the speakers, keyboard, battery, webcam are almost caught up in quality with Macbooks when you look at products like LG Gram.

Reg. Screen Quality, some windows machines have better screens actually, and those are the OLED ones.