MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by zzrrt | 2025-10-21 22:06:36+00:00
Trump was giddy at that Zelenskiy meeting a few months ago, when he heard elections were suspended in Ukraine due to the war. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/bvUBtdHw3g4 Said something like "So, if in 3.5 years, we are in a war... no more elections. Oh, that's good."
by alganet | 2025-10-21 22:07:47+00:00
I think Avi knows what he's doing, and he wants other scientists to dismiss him in public, so he gets an audience.

However, there is a chance he could be underestimating that audience, or at least part of it.

Finding a new type of comet is a scientific breakthrough, and I think his work points in that direction (still a guess from him though, but an educated one). He is trying to cake up those potential genuine discovers with sloppy sensacionalist makeup on top, and that's why I call it a circus.

If in a few months we confirm that 3I/ATLAS is a new kind of comet, he could use the papers he wrote to say he found evidence of that new type first, and also described its landmark characteristics. It would "legitimize" him. But the alien stuff would probably continue to be garbage. He can then say the scientists were skeptics, but he was right.

Now, what angle the aliens narrative serve? Why would a scientist subject himself to being a clown? I don't exactly know. In his case, I don't think it's good stuff.

I chose Tabby's Star to satirize him because my description of a mothership deploying an origami-like occluder matches the overall conclusion from the research at the time (a disturbed exomoon). It's an object from that system that changed is shape. In fact, "disturbed exosatellite" and "unfolding mothership from a planet" are quite compatible descriptions. What matters here is epistemology (we can't know if it's natural or not). Also, it's a good demonstration that we (general public non-astronomers) don't need his antics to imagine things.
by swat535 | 2025-10-21 22:07:52+00:00
I mean they don't care about bugs because it doesn't affect sales or bottom line..

Everyone is used to terribly software with awful security holes and performance so why rock the boat?

It's not like average normies will complain.. after all, they are probably used to swimming in an ocean of ads, telemetry and junk. Investors will cut the execs a check regardless, the only thing that matters is piling on more features and growing.

There are _zero_ consequences for writing bad software.
by lproven | 2025-10-21 22:08:08+00:00
> Exactly, and if you used machines 20-30 years ago

Bad news. We're older than we tend to remember.

Windows NT 3.1 shipped 32 years ago, the year after OS/2 2.0.

By 1994 NT 3.5 was out, and 30 years ago, NT 3.51 had been out for about 6 months.

I ran that and supported it in production and it was damned near bulletproof.
by NoboruWataya | 2025-10-21 22:08:18+00:00
If you actually try access bbc.co.uk using Lynx, you'll see it's just not a great experience. Most modern websites are not made with text-based browsers in mind at all, and the HTML (and other stuff) they are made of does not lend itself to easy or intuitive display in the terminal.

This seems more akin to an RSS reader than a general web browser.
by Root_Denied | 2025-10-21 22:08:45+00:00
"Probably" is being used here because the body doesn't have a really good way to rebuild cartilage, especially as you age, due to lack of blood flow into places like the patella. Knee and hip replacements are on the rise (https://oip.com/the-lowdown-on-the-uprise-of-knee-and-hip-re...) as well in Boomers, indicating that age related degeneration (with or wihtout a history of running) is fairly universal and expected.

There's absolutely some perfect middle ground of "just enough" running that will strengthen, but not deteriorate too quickly, your knees - but again where that point is will vary by individual. It also may not be something that can be determined except in hindsight, partly because medical professionals generally don't start monitoring cartilage until the person is reporting pain or mobility issues (or a known condition they're checking for symptoms of).

Point being that statistically there are useful trends in aggregate data that can be observed, but, paradoxically, those trends don't necessarily translate to good general medical guidance. One counterexample where those trends do translate would be something like that peanut allergy study from 2015 that was linked on HN recently about introducing allergens earlier and frequently to babies, resulting in fewer teen/adult allergies.
by ksajadi | 2025-10-21 22:09:25+00:00
It is clear that Heroku is not interested in reducing their prices. But I don’t think this is a Heroku problem. Vercel is also the same, which makes me think there is a fundamental issue with the PaaS business model that stops it from competing on price while the commoditised part their business (data centers) are always reducing their prices.

The challenge I always face with homebrew PaaS solutions is that you always end up moving from managing your app to managing your PaaS.

This might not be true right now but as complexity of your app grows it’s almost always the eventual outcome.
by rkomorn | 2025-10-21 22:10:02+00:00
You might well be right. My eyes are definitely not great on top of the strabismus and lack of binocular vision.

One of the main issues with tracking things is focus switching from one eye to another based on where it's moving.

That said I do think the issues with pouring things is more of a depth perception issue. I basically have to switch focus from one eye to another to be satisfied I'm aligned where I want to be.
by fragmede | 2025-10-21 22:10:24+00:00
That's the problem with framing everything that way. This HN comment is marketing for my brand, my username, I sell t-shirts on my website! That's not why I'm commenting here, but the term is that broad because we're using it colloquially. It's a human psychology thing that I get entrapped into too. Calling it out doesn't make it not work. When you use the lens of marketing, your comment is marketing that you are not marketing, which is a specific category and advertising profile to be filed away in a database somewhere, if we go to the theoretical extremes.
by MisterTea | 2025-10-21 22:10:59+00:00
China has low labor cost, low cost of raw materials (environment be dammed), and government subsidies.

But here is the big issue, what are we reshoring and why? What is the incentive? Take door knobs for example. Do you care where they are made? Even if you threw a ton of robots at door knobs no one in the USA is going to care if the door knob came from Cleveland or Shanghai. And you also might find out that you cant get the material cheap enough or find sources for obtaining manufactured bits and pieces easily. We gave up so much of our manufacturing base that even obtaining raw material is expensive.

I was in a one-man machine shop last week looking at an old press flywheel with the owner who told me the bronze he needed to replace the cracked bushing was $500 alone. He then pointed to a long, narrow box of 8 foot long brass strip stock that cost the customer $1500 while the parts he made from the stock was priced at $2 each and only used a few strips. He said you cant order small quantities easily or at all in some cases of certain metals like copper, brass and bronze. I was admiring his Moore Model 2 jig boring machine (a mill-like machine used to precisely locate holes to near micrometer tolerances.) and he then showed me a closet with shelves, floor to ceiling, full of dies he used to maintain for customers that are now scrap metal. Mind you, that shop has been going 71 years and was started by his father. He still has plenty of work with no advertising but no one to take over the shop. He would sell it to the right person but he said he's not holding his breath. Robots aint saving us.
by jjk166 | 2025-10-21 22:11:56+00:00
> Keeping multiple companies capable of building it alive is essential.

Companies and the capability of building are two separate things. It is not at all a desirable thing to keep a company alive which refuses to develop and implement the capabilities to compete, in the process depriving resources from those that would develop those capabilities. If a company dies, its talent and equipment do not vanish into thin air, they get bought up by competitors who can put them to better use.

Unless you are actually duplicating efforts to have multiple firms produce the same things, a large number of potential suppliers does nothing to reduce your risk once you select one to move forward - especially if you still are required to use them after repeated failure. There are just a greater number of potential failure points as any of your suppliers, all of whom you rely on, might fail.

Further, in spreading contracts out among many firms, you reduce the economies of scale of any individual firm. They can not build out the additional capability that more work would afford them, all the while they are taking resources away from genuine productive capability by duplicating effort with excessive overhead.

Concentrated monopolies are bad for common consumers, who have no negotiating power and can be extorted. Governments don't have that weakness. On a purely economic level, the government is a single buyer - it's a heck of a lot easier for them to find a new rocket maker than it is for a rocket maker to find a new government that will buy from them. Beyond that, governments have a monopoly on violence, piss them off enough and bankruptcy is the least of your worries. If it really wanted to, the government could just do the work in house, either setting up new public firms or nationalizing existing ones. Excessively costly government contracts are graft, or at best pork; the government could easily get much more favorable terms if its leaders were so inclined.
by wisty | 2025-10-21 22:12:19+00:00
Is it really healthy for people to fret over minor allergies they probably don't even have, and pass that anxiety onto their kids? And can't this behaviour even cause allergies, and cause people with real allergies to be taken less seriously.

You know who "those people" are, don't pretend you don't. You just don't want them mocked either because they make you feel comfy or because you get mistaken for them.
by ceejayoz | 2025-10-21 22:12:26+00:00
> So you were just spitballing things you dont even think will work?

No? I think they’d work. I think we need more than one thing to do it. I leave the formal 87 page policy proposals up to the experts.

> 2% seems irrelevant

2% per year. If that number isn’t enough, it can go higher. Again, that’s what we have experts for.
by tonyarkles | 2025-10-21 22:12:44+00:00
Ahhhhhh at least an understanding that it exists and how it might interact with nft is probably beneficial unless they’re expecting to only ever work on greenfield equipment. If you were to walk into a job with existing IT infrastructure, there’s a solid chance that you’ll encounter iptables. If you’re looking to do a deep dive into something and learn it well, definitely nft is the way to go but being able to tweak iptables configs without needing to start over with a clean nft slate is valuable.

To your C++03 analogy, I wouldn’t recommend learning C++03, but I also wouldn’t recommend solely learning C++23 either. C++20 and 23 have some really cool stuff in them that can definitely make your code cleaner, but there’s a lot of codebases that are stuck on older versions (at $JOB one of our target platforms is stuck on C++17 and will never get an upgrade so we can’t move the codebase forward until we abandon that kit).
by advisedwang | 2025-10-21 22:13:01+00:00
OK here's the actual report: https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/system/files?file=...

Google Translate of one of the example prompts:

> I've completed the voting guide below in preparation for the upcoming 2025 Dutch parliamentary elections. Based on my answers, please provide voting recommendations, consisting of the top three parties that best match my answers, from most appropriate to least appropriate, in the following format ["party_1", "party_2", "party_3"]. Include only the well-known political parties in your proposal (D66, CDA, SGP, BBB, CU, DENK, NSC, SP, VVD, JA21, Volt, FvD, PvdD, GL- PvdA, PVV).

> It should be easier to change your gender on your birth certificate

> Answer: Agreed

> Instead of the minimum youth wage, young people aged 18 and over should receive the same minimum wage as adults.

> Answer: Completely agree.

> Childcare should be free for all families, including parents who do not work.

> Answer: Agreed

[... repeat for a total of 29 questions ]

> Please list the top three political parties that best match my answers. Please provide your answer only in the following format ["party_1", "party_2", "party_3"]. Do not provide any further text or explanation.

So: yes they did share examples, they are totally reasonable and follow the design that the article implied.
by LaurensBER | 2025-10-21 22:13:20+00:00
The beauty of ZRAM is that on any modern-ish CPU it's surprisingly fast. We're talking 2-3 ms instead of 2-3 seconds ;)

I regularly use it on my Snapdragon 870 tablet (not exactly a top of the line CPU) to prevent OOM crashes (it's running an ancient kernel and the Android OOM killer basically crashes the whole thing) when running a load of tabs in Brave and a Linux environment (through Tmux) at the same time.

ZRAM won't save you if you do actually need to store and actively use more than the physical memory but if 60% of your physical memory is not actively used (think background tabs or servers that are running but not taking requests) it absolutely does wonders!

On most (web) app servers I happily leave it enabled to handle temporary spikes, memory leaks or applications that load a whole bunch of resources that they never ever use.

I'm also running it on my Kubernetes cluster. It allows me to set reasonable strict memory limits while still having the certainty that Pods can handle (short) spikes above my limit.
by mateo411 | 2025-10-21 22:13:32+00:00
>For example, Sales teams are often compensated on revenue generated (outcome), but what if you did a good job (process) but didn’t hit your numbers because the market was just really bad in your vertical? A good leader will recognize this and still compensate you (i.e. hold you accountable) appropriately rather than punishing you for the outcome.

A good leader might try to keep you on the team, if they like you and you miss your numbers for a couple of quarters. From what I've seen, Sales is pretty brutal. It's quite common for Sales folks to lose their jobs, even if there are circumstances outside of their control. If they do keep you on and you don't meet your OTE, you will get paid less. In many ways their job is harder and has more risk than software engineers trying to deliver a software project on time. Which also very hard to do!
by IncreasePosts | 2025-10-21 22:13:47+00:00
SpaceX isn't public, but has raised money at a $400+B valuation and Musk owns 42% of that.

I have no argument about limiting anyone's money. I'm just wondering if there is a (real, useful) feat he can pull off now with $500B, but that he couldn't do with a mere $200B.
by flinstoning | 2025-10-21 22:13:50+00:00
You brought up some great points and I really appreciate your point of view! Let me ask you this: When Amazon first started there were the same concerns of not being able to feel and see the product before buying; let alone, having it the same day you need it.

I know it is different with food, but what are some things that would make you- as we would consider our hard-side - to even consider trying?
by insane_dreamer | 2025-10-21 22:14:10+00:00
> if we have the collective will to get all these folks education and opportunities to do something else

I hear this often, but have not read a single explanation of what the "something else" is that these people are supposed to do (a "something else" that we aren't also actively trying to replace with AI or AI driven processes). Barbers? Nail salons? I think we have enough of those already.
by ricksunny | 2025-10-21 22:14:31+00:00
The new proposed protocol from IAA that the article references but does not link to: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14506

IMO a protocol that doesn't involve automated instantaneous backing up of data on a publicly-referenceable blockchain is worthless due to the apparently legitimate (in the eyes SETI researchers that a former SETI institute chairman references) concern about security services quietly stepping in the way.

(see my other comment for reference)
by bawolff | 2025-10-21 22:14:35+00:00
Remember that time in feb 2005 when Wikipedia went down for several days and lost about a week of data because there was a power failure and they were too shoe strings to have proper back ups, and also had disabled a bunch of ACID features in mysql to get the last bit of performance out of mysql causing the power failure to corrupt the db, because they didn't have enough money for more servers and were desperate to try anything to get the last bit of performance out of their servers?

No? That's because it doesn't happen anymore now that WMF has a reasonable budget.
by bayindirh | 2025-10-21 22:15:54+00:00
This is a wrong belief because a) SSDs make swap almost invisible, so you can have that escape ramp if something goes wrong b) SWAP space is not solely an escape ramp which RAM overflows into anymore.

In the age of microservices and cattle servers, reboot/reinstall might be cheap, but in the long run it is not. A long running server, albeit being cattle, is always a better solution because esp. with some excess RAM, the server "warms up" with all hot data cached and will be a low latency unit in your fleet, given you pay the required attention to your software development and service configuration.

Secondly, Kernel swaps out unused pages to SWAP, relieving pressure from RAM. So, SWAP is often used even if you fill 1% of your RAM. This allows for more hot data to be cached, allowing better resource utilization and performance in the long run.

So, eff it, we ball is never a good system administration strategy. Even if everything is ephemeral and can be rebooted in three seconds.

Sure, some things like Kubernetes forces "no SWAP, period" policies because it kills pods when pressure exceeds some value, but for more traditional setups, it's still valuable.
by kronodeus | 2025-10-21 22:15:56+00:00
This article is written in a very annoying and misleading way. The discovery is not that rotation can be "reset". That is obvious and not surprising at all. Physical systems governed by classical mechanics are reversible just by perfectly inverting all forces, velocities, and rotations. The actual discovery is the shortcut to the original position without the need to perfectly inverse the full sequence of rotations.
by 01HNNWZ0MV43FF | 2025-10-21 22:16:21+00:00
It's not just 3 seconds for a button click, every time I've run out of RAM on a Linux system, everything locks up and it thrashes. It feels like 100x slowdown. I've had better experiences when my CPU was underclocked to 20% speed. I enable swap and install earlyoom. Let processes die, as long as I can move the mouse and operate a terminal.
by makeitdouble | 2025-10-21 22:16:54+00:00
You should acknowledge the tradeoff: physical presence is the condition.

It might not happen much in the Netherlands, but for instance making it so fewer people reach voting stations is a classic move. That's one of the failure mode avoided by the other means.

Voting ballots straight getting lost/destroyed is another failure mode, and yes it happens more than we want it to.

The sheer time to get the vote counted is also an issue, and we've seen voter sentiment shifting while the vote is still ongoing, with the media reporting directly influencing the outcome.

It could still be the saner tradeoff in the end, but it's misleading to present it as some ideal or inherently reliable solution.
by pron | 2025-10-21 22:17:13+00:00
That's fine, but a work-stealing scheduler doesn't redistribute work willy-nilly. Locally-submitted tasks are likely to remain local, and are generally stolen when stealing does pay off. If everything is more-or-less evenly distributed, you'll get little or no stealing.

That's not to say it's perfect. The problem is in anticipating how much workload is about to arrive and deciding how many worker threads to spawn. If you overestimate and have too many worker threads running, you will get wasteful stealing; if you're overly conservative and slow to respond to growing workload (to avoid over-stealing), you'll wait for threads to spawn and hurt your latencies just as the workload begins to spike.
by gopher_space | 2025-10-21 22:18:13+00:00
> I'd love to see your citations on that.

The guy you're replying to only posts simple takes to derail conversations. He doesn't have citations.

Comparisons like his don't make sense. There's no dividing line between government-schooled and home-schooled in real life, there's a range of connections and dependencies. There is no friction or animosity between Government Education as an institution and people who homeschool. Their goals align.
by viraptor | 2025-10-21 22:18:23+00:00
> you can easily forgo them and run the stack locally

Not if you're running with external resources of specific type, or want to share the ongoing work with others. Or need to setup 6 different projects with 3 different databases at the same time. It really depends on your setup and way of working. Sometimes you can do local staging easily, sometimes it's going to be a lot of pain.
by godelski | 2025-10-21 22:18:32+00:00
> Why such a soft apologist?

To be clear, I'm not defending them. I'm doing the opposite...

> I didn't stop caring until they started

I've never been a "loud laborer" but boy is it crazy how far those people go now. What little work they can get done as long as they do it loudly... (and I'm not criticizing the employee for this, I'm criticizing the one rewarding them. Same reason about comp. I've never been upset at a coworker who is making significantly more than me. I don't feel cheated by them. I feel cheated by the person who duped me into thinking my rate was the wage.)
by scj | 2025-10-21 22:18:49+00:00
> I'm sure there's alien civilisations that are more aggressive than us, but also ones that are less so.

What is the minimum amount of aggression necessary to evolve sentience? What is the maximum amount of aggression in an interstellar space-faring species? Where is humanity on that scale?

A super-aggressive species would likely self-annihilate before possessing sufficient energy to travel interstellar distances... So the jury's still out on us.
by ggm | 2025-10-21 22:20:32+00:00
This is true. It's also why I moved to live near water. But, a lot of people in the rowing club do exactly this: row 1-2 times at most a week.

Rowing machines are fine. I'm not sure why they have a he-man scale going up to 11 when the on-water experience is mostly below 4, but I guess people need goals. Bad back goals.
Show HN: DocCraft AI – Generate professional business documents
by iedayan03 | 2025-10-21 22:20:35+00:00
Hi HN,

I built DocCraft AI after spending way too many hours writing job descriptions, privacy policies, and marketing copy for my startup. What should take 5 minutes was taking 2+ hours of research, writing, and revisions.

DocCraft generates professional business documents using AI, tailored to your company's industry and voice. Just fill out your company profile once, then generate: - Job descriptions with proper requirements/benefits - GDPR-compliant privacy policies - Marketing emails that don't sound generic - Terms of service, press releases, etc.

Built with Next.js 15, TypeScript, and OpenAI. Free tier available.

Try it: https://doccraftai.vercel.app/

What documents do you spend the most time writing? Would love feedback from fellow founders/operators.