MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by jauntywundrkind | 2025-06-05 06:12:59+00:00
Looking forward to the day when this kind of board isn't radically oversubcribed. So many awesome expansion options but they are all running with reduced lane counts at old revs.

2x miniPCIe slots with PCIe3.0 2lane interface for Wi-Fi NIC 2x M.2 M-KEY slots with PCIe3.0 1lane interface for NVME SSD (PCIe can switch to M.2 B-KEY slot) 3x M.2 B-KEY slots with USB3.2 for 5G Module

Who knows what the cores actual NIC is; there's probably some switch chip and then a much smaller pipe back to the core.
by pvo50555 | 2025-06-05 06:13:50+00:00
I am consistently shocked at how bad Apple Notes is. I like the features it has and I like the iCloud sync between devices... I use it daily. But it's so damn buggy. It's a notes app! Why do new lines on a moderately-long note cause half the text to disappear until I hit the carriage return a few times? I also wish it simply converted copied text to plaintext by default rather than trying to preserve formatting.
by pjerem | 2025-06-05 06:13:56+00:00
Well, sure. Except that in most of the world outside SV, $200/month is expensive.

At least Cursor is affordable to any developer. Because most of the time, even if it’s totally normal, companies act like they’re doing you a favor when they pay for your IDE so most people aren’t going to ask an AI subscription anytime soon.

I mean, it will probably come but not today.
by motorest | 2025-06-05 06:15:29+00:00
Taken from the blog:

> Why are we talking about “graduate and PhD-level intelligence” in these systems if they can’t find and verify relevant links — even directly after a search?

This is my pet peeves, and recently OpenAI's models seem to have become very militant in how they stand by and push their obviously hallucinated sources. I'm talking about hallucinating answers, when pressed to cite sources they also hallucinate URLs that never existed, when repeatedly prompted to verify how the are hallucinating the stick to their clearly wrong output, and ultimately fall back to claiming they were right but the URL somehow changed even though it never existed ever.

In order to start talking about PhD-level intelligence, in the very least these LLMs must support PhD-level context-seeking and information verification. It is not enough to output a wall of text that reads quite fluently. You must stick to verifiable facts.
by IcePic | 2025-06-05 06:16:43+00:00
> It's not acceptable to have FSD crashes same as it's not acceptable for people to crash.

Not sure what you mean by that? We could prevent almost every death, for instance by limiting speeds to <10 for instance, that would remove SO many accidents and incidents. It would also make travel take a really long time, like as if it was 200 years ago and you rode your horse across the country. But it would prevent almost all serious accidents.

So the statement "its not acceptable for people to crash" is not true in a general sense. We are already balancing a certain amount of risk versus convenience of riding at speed to get places fast, to get transports in a timely manner and so on. Some countries, like Germany has roads with free speeds and get really horrible crashes at times involving many cars. Others place maximum limits to try to strike some kind of balance between accident rate/impact and the convenience or speed people would like to have, but from what I can tell, no country has set the limits so low that it actually fulfills what you wrote, that it is not acceptable for people to crash.

It is solvable today, just not popular to make that actual decision. But it could be done and people would stop dying on the roads.
by OJFord | 2025-06-05 06:17:28+00:00
Of those that are tweets and similar? Almost all of them (the ones I look at being interested in the topic anyway).

By 'know' I mean recognise the name as some sort of authority. I don't 'know' Jon Gruber or Sam Altman or Matt Levine, but I'll recognise them and understand why we're discussing their tweet.

The linked tweet (whatever it's called) didn't say anything more than the title did here, so it was pointless to click through really. In replies someone asked the source and someone else replied with the link I commented above. (I don't 'know' those people either, but I recognise Ars/even if I didn't appreciate the longer form with more info.)
by otherme123 | 2025-06-05 06:19:05+00:00
They are actually lacking. Their reliability is low (https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2024-us-vehi...), even comparing with ICEs, and as electric vehicles they should be naturally more reliable. They are also known to refuse to participate in quality studies (https://www.motorbiscuit.com/dumb-reason-tesla-ineligible-j-...). In 2023 they were at the bottom of the reliability list by JD Power (https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2023-us-init...).
by Frieren | 2025-06-05 06:19:29+00:00
> Spicy. European courts and governments will love to see their laws and legal opinions being shrugged away in ironic quotes.

The GDPR allows to retain data when require by law as long as needed. People that make regulations may make mistakes sometimes, but they are no that stupid as to not understand the law and what things it may require.

The data was correctly deleted on user demand. But it cannot be deleted where there is a Court order in place. The conclusion of "GDPR is in conflict with the law" looks like rage baiting.
by fracus | 2025-06-05 06:20:18+00:00
As a casual spectator of chess tournament streams, I find speed chess to be much more enjoyable to watch. It isn't fun when the players aren't making mistakes. Classical chess feels like F1 racing where the work is done before the match with very little passing and timed chess feels like a derby rally with a lot of bumping and grinding. Just way more fun to watch.
by nmhancoc | 2025-06-05 06:21:03+00:00
I don’t think so, actually. Real estate is a pretty small sector of the economy (maybe 13 or 14% of GDP according to Google. That’s about as much as manufacturing, but not politically unassailable.

The real reason these sorts of reforms will never kick in is that roughly 2/3 of Americans are in owner occupied housing, it’s the largest asset on most of their balance sheets, and an LVT will in many cases effectively zero that out.

So it’s the homeowners (particularly the older cohorts) which will vote against this policy to the detriment of the younger cohort.
by DidYaWipe | 2025-06-05 06:21:34+00:00
Thanks, but most of those are examples of exactly what I'm talking about: an editor with a Markdown "preview" function tacked on. I just want to double-click on the .md file and read it in a rendered form. Otherwise... what's the point?

And because of the lack of such readers, everyone just reads the plain text with a bunch of garbage in it. It's just gallingly dumb.
by Dylan16807 | 2025-06-05 06:23:39+00:00
On the other hand I suspect there's a level of board game complexity where being blind (or not having a well-integrated image processor) makes a notable difference in how well you can track the pieces. You have the same information but you don't have the same systems for organizing and tracking that information. You're worse at using that information, which is effectively a drop in "intelligence".
by JimDabell | 2025-06-05 06:23:46+00:00
Yes. It’s already profitable to run inference at today’s prices. AWS isn’t subsidising you when you buy compute from them. And inference cost is declining steeply.

> The cost of LLM inference has dropped by a factor of 1,000 in 3 years.

— https://a16z.com/llmflation-llm-inference-cost/

AI startups are not profitable because they are throwing vast sums of money at growth and R&D, not because inference is unaffordable.
by Mistletoe | 2025-06-05 06:24:23+00:00
Lebron has a saying- "Father Time is undefeated."

https://www.chess.com/blog/LionChessLtd/age-vs-elo---your-ba...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277316182...

Magnus is 34, he's just going to have to deal with it like every exceptional person has.
by tpm | 2025-06-05 06:24:43+00:00
I could, or you could use google. Neither of those tools can solve any issue caused by type erasure.

Just to give some examples, the instanceof operator does not work with generic types, it's not possible to instantiate a generic type (can't do a new T()), can't overload methods that differ only in generic parameter type (so List<String> vs List<Integer>) and so on. Some limitations can be worked around with sending around explicit type info (like also sending the Class<T> when using T), reflection etc., but it's cumbersome, and not everything can be solved that way.
by bobsomers | 2025-06-05 06:24:55+00:00
They're not actually that great of an EV anymore. The build quality is lackluster and the ride on the Model 3 in particular is quite harsh.

Some of the comments I hear almost universally from prior Model 3 owners when they switch to an Ioniq 5 is how much nicer the ride quality is and how nice it is to have buttons on the dash again.
by japanuspus | 2025-06-05 06:25:07+00:00
> Borrowing and taxation are completely different concepts. Unless I am the only idiot who hasn't asked for their tax back with interest. Possible.

I get the impression that maybe you are not aware of what is implied by the 'buy, borrow, die' tax strategy that parent is referring to: in effect it completely eliminates taxes on capital gains (in the US). [0] and [1] below are first two Google hits.

[0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/BuyBorrowDieExplained/comments/1f26... [1]: https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/buy-borrow-die-how-ric...
by wg0 | 2025-06-05 06:25:08+00:00
I meant you're using Cursor (I assume Claud as the model) and also wondering that you go over monthly usages and then what product/project is that where you find it so useful that you have such a usage.

I have used or rather use Claud with CoPilot and I find it pretty useful but at times it gets stuck in niche areas.
by eru | 2025-06-05 06:25:43+00:00
Why do you want to punish anyone? What's that strange obsession.

Land Value Tax is simply an efficient tax system that minimalises dead weight losses. Yes, Henry George was a big fan of them, but he was just one proponent. LVT does not live and fall with Henry George.

> Borrowing and taxation are completely different concepts. Unless I am the only idiot who hasn't asked for their tax back with interest. Possible.

I am saying that your specific objections to taxing unrealised gains do not apply.

> They aren't poor in that they have at least one valuable asset. The kind of asset that helps people stay afloat when they have issues with income or domestic violence. Regressive taxes are regressive because they simply do not look at income. Someone can be retired, living on nearly no income, and have a single valuable asset. It is not the role of government to significantly disrupt peoples lives because they have 1 good thing going. IIRC home ownership is the single best indicator of mental health.

You are proving too much. Holding down a steady job is also a great indicator of mental health. So the government shouldn't tax your job either? Ie income tax bad?

You have to tax something to run the government.

Btw, you could run a land value tax but give everyone a universal basic income equivalent to the LVT paid by the median person. That means only people who sit on more than the median amount of land (by value) would pay a net tax. Everyone else would see a net income from the system. That would immediately knock out all of your arguments about those poor widows and orphans.

(In taxation and income, medians tend to be lower than averages, so the above system would leave money left over to use for general government revenue. If you want more of that, instead of paying the median amount, you could pay UBI at eg the 20%-ile level. That would still protect those people who only 'have 1 good thing going' from net outflowing payments.)
by BozeWolf | 2025-06-05 06:26:25+00:00
I tried it, it did some magical stuff, like completely rewriting my go test suite from matrix based tests to individual tests. Took a few minutes. Code was mostly correct.

Also had a few misses. But in general it is ok. Still prefer ai assistant, because i can then direct the result into a certain direction. It also feels faster, it probably is not because of the manual stuff involved.
by WarOnPrivacy | 2025-06-05 06:26:36+00:00
I was looking at one of these to play with @ $126. But to the US it's another $45 for shipping+import.

Then US Customs gets a hold of it and tacks on tariffs (I know from recent exp).

To Canada, the same kit is C$151.31 ($110.41 USD) delivered.

ref: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806070397585.html
by nemanja_codes | 2025-06-05 06:26:47+00:00
Location: Serbia, GMT +2 Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: React, Next.js, JavaScript/TypeScript, Node.js, Astro, TailwindCSS, Jest, Cypress, Prisma, PostrgreSQL, MongoDB, Docker, C#/.NET Resume/CV: Available on request GitHub: https://github.com/nemanjam Website: https://nemanjamitic.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nemanja-mitic Email: nemanja.mitic.elfak [at] hotmail.com

I am a full stack developer with a Master's degree in Computer Science and 4.5 years of professional experience with JavaScript. My top skills are React/Next.js and I am also good with Node.js backends. I have decent experience with C# and .NET but currently it is not my main focus. I have a decent understanding of DevOps technologies (Linux, containers, IaC, automation) for a developer. I also have an interest in Python and FastAPI.

Here are some of my projects:

1. Comprehensive project: full stack Next.js, Prisma, unit, integration, e2e tests, CI/CD.

https://github.com/nemanjam/nextjs-prisma-boilerplate

2. Latest project: HN job ads aggregator, Next.js, SQLite (GitHub and demo links are in the first post).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42373936

I have experience working remotely for startups within globally distributed multicultural teams.

I am looking for a full-time remote position. If we work well and stable I can relocate. I have detailed resume available upon request. You can check out my other projects at https://github.com/nemanjam . You can tell me about your company and project via email: nemanja.mitic.elfak [at] hotmail.com or connect with me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nemanja-mitic .
by Hacksign | 2025-06-05 06:27:00+00:00
QD not only covers the functionalities of traditional ARK tools but also meets common requirements during the emergency response process. Using this tool can greatly improve the efficiency of emergency handling and quickly locate potential malicious items in the target environment.

The log export ability of QD allows ordinary users to easily and comprehensively extract various system information, while the import ability enables professionals to fully understand the conditions of the host from which the logs were exported, thus rapidly identifying suspicious activities within the system.

If you have threat intelligence resources at hand, combined with the structured logs exported by QD, you can build an automated threat analysis system (another form of sandbox).
by UncleMeat | 2025-06-05 06:27:21+00:00
Yarvin’s views spread on hackernews and reddit. The world would be a better place if he was just downvoted to hell initially. I will not participate in something that we already know led to harm.

Academics and anti fascist activists should study authoritarians. But in some random web forum the person boosting these ideologies isn’t engaged in any sort of meaningful anti fascism. They are at best a useful rube and at worst genuinely advocating for these illiberal positions.
by Animats | 2025-06-05 06:27:42+00:00
"Fleet response can influence the Waymo Driver's path, whether indirectly through indicating lane closures, explicitly requesting the AV use a particular lane, or, in the most complex scenarios, explicitly proposing a path for the vehicle to consider. The Waymo Driver evaluates the input from fleet response and independently remains in control of driving. This collaboration enhances the rider experience by efficiently guiding them to their destinations."[1]

It looks like the way this works is that the vehicle first has to come to a stop autonomously, and the control center then gives it instructions on what to do next. It's for getting out of stuck situations.

California's CPUC permit for Waymo operation does not allow teleoperation.[2]

Reviews of the job on Glassdoor indicate that it's more or less OK. No opportunity for advancement, but snacks are included.

[1] https://waymo.com/blog/2024/05/fleet-response

[2] https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/consu...
by karthink | 2025-06-05 06:28:11+00:00
> tried all the fancy context management stuff multiple times, but I mostly just have a chat buffer open and copy paste stuff manually.

As of last week you can insert a link to a plain-text file in a chat buffer to include its contents in the prompt. It must be on a line by itself. In Markdown it looks

[like this](/path/to/file)

with Org links in Org chat buffers.

This feature is disabled by default to minimize confusion. To enable it you can flip the header line button that says "ignoring media" to "sending media". This works for sending images and other media too, if the model supports it.
by NoPicklez | 2025-06-05 06:29:17+00:00
Yes it is a weak argument, but otherwise I disagree.

Data about a hitting a pedestrian or having an accident isn't proprietary tech. They're not asking for source code, but for data that should arguably be made available for people to see in the interest of transparency and this information is sought consistently from other car makers.

Tesla is of course sticking out like a sore thumb, because they have put the most investment into EV's and "autopilot" features the data might show that they stick out.
by tomislav | 2025-06-05 06:29:18+00:00
Senior iOS Developer Location: Croatia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: 17 years of iOS development, Swift, Objective-C

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomislavf/

GitHub: https://github.com/tomislav

Email: tomislav@me.com

Lead iOS developer for multiple award-winning apps, featured by Apple, The New York Times and Forbes. Working remotely for distributed companies for the last 12 years.
by whytevuhuni | 2025-06-05 06:30:05+00:00
I don't know Ada / SPARK, and I've been trying to figure this out. Based on the hallucinations I got from ChatGPT, it seems Ada itself is nowhere near as powerful as Rust in safety, while Ada with SPARK disallows some things I was considering to be quite basic, such as shared aliasing of data.

For example, it seems it's not possible to get a sub-string slice reference to an original unbounded string. In rust, a &str -> &str signature is trivial.

So it seems Ada still relies on discipline, while SPARK does not have the zero-cost abstractions that C++ and Rust have.

If that's true (is it?), then I'd definitely choose C++/Rust over Ada any time, since performance is very important to me.
by franga2000 | 2025-06-05 06:30:10+00:00
I worked as a tech on an art project involving a phone booth on a public square and every few hours I was there I'd see some children go in and try to talk. There were two unused booths, so on a few occasions I saw sibling go into them and "talk" to each other. The phones weren't plugged in, but my plan for this year is to set up an intercom between them. I also saw a lot of parent take their kids up to the booths and tell them about what it was like when we didn't have phones in our pockets.
by IcePic | 2025-06-05 06:30:18+00:00
And I was meaning to circle back again to the comparison of incidents and crashes with or without computer assistance but got derailed. =)

If we then figure that we are in the situation where those who decide are balancing between X% fatalities per year when people drive like they do currently, why would it be controversial to allow FSD or other similar techniques to have the same or lower rate of crashes?

I'm not buying into Teslas own statistics on crashes per km/mile because lying with statistics is kind of easy, but lets pretend one or all car manufacturers manage to get cars to have 0.4% crash rate per year when people have 0.5%, why would anyone then want to prevent people from using FSD? Why would we apply a different set of standards for one "type" of driver and not the other? And if we were to apply different standards, which might be reasonable, why would we not choose the "safer" one?

Not claiming we necessarily are at a place where computer assisted driving is demonstrably safer, but when we actually can prove it is even just a tenth percent better, by that time I think we should have an answer for this question.
by throw8283933i | 2025-06-05 06:31:23+00:00
> on realised employment income is more progressive

Most of income from employment is "unrealised". Employment comes with expenses such as car for commuting, rent in expensive part of town (where jobs are), clothes... Big part of "income" does not even land on a bank account (mandatory insurances, taxes, child support, alimony....)

If we will apply logic from property tax, to employment income tax, everyone would pay 100 USD tax every year. Because that was tax of 20 years old in their first job, and raising taxes is horrible!
by UncleMeat | 2025-06-05 06:32:38+00:00
The US has ample evil within it and has a long history of authoritarian monstrosity. I also spend time and money fighting illiberalism within the existing system.

The problems within the US do not justify constructing a system that has illiberalism as a goal, which will permit no possible internal resistance to authoritarianism.

I am not saying that Yarvin’s state is the only one that will kill me. I am saying that it is substantially more likely to do so.
by rbanffy | 2025-06-05 06:32:50+00:00
> The only practical outcomes so far have been books banned from some Army libraries, websites changed, and posturing

And countless abuses by police and ICE against immigrants with legal status and court orders protecting them. Being unconstitutional or otherwise impractical doesn’t stop the abuses. While EOs might be challenged, so will have the abuse instances. The goal is not to pass everything, but to overwhelm the defenses of their targets.
by DidYaWipe | 2025-06-05 06:33:32+00:00
Wow, you got off easy.

That keyboard was such a POS that a Wall Street Journal writer did a feature story on it without correcting any of the mistakes the keyboard introduced. It was essentially illegible. Then the Web site had buttons that you could push to remove each kind of error and make it legible: https://www.wsj.com/graphics/apple-still-hasnt-fixed-its-mac...
by sixhobbits | 2025-06-05 06:34:03+00:00
"just use templates and an editor" is simple for us but still a learning curve for the people I wanted to help with this. I was going to recommend carrd, but I think this is even simpler. You can definitely get pretty fancy if you make a lot of edit requests or have a very detailed creation prompt, I will update the linked examples with some more creative stuff people built.
by Shubham_APIFLUX | 2025-06-05 06:34:15+00:00
no, ApiFlux is not a visualizer for the Arazzo spec, although it shares a similar philosophy around composing and testing API workflows visually

Arazzo (if you're referring to the workflow spec concept around JSON-based API orchestration) focuses on defining flow logic in a declarative format — essentially a specification for how APIs interconnect.

ApiFlux is a visual playground, aimed at backend developers who want to quickly prototype, test, and debug multi-step API flows using a node-based UI (like React Flow). It allows you to:

Visually build the flow without writing orchestration specs

Execute and test it in real time

Transform data mid-flow

View live inputs, outputs, and errors

Think of it more like Postman + n8n, but purpose-built for developers testing backend logic, not automations.